From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 01:10:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010110.m111A4fg007920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-31 20:10 EST ------- build will be coordinated with build of elilo package removing efibootmgr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 01:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010120.m111KECU009562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2008-01-31 20:20 EST ------- Thanks for the re-review. I'll fix the changelog. I already have an account. I just need cvsextras approval to move forward. :-) Note: This is the point where things got bogged down last time, so maybe something is wrong with the state of my account ("tmoertel"). Please let me know if you find any problems. Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 01:54:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010154.m111s4vH014244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-01-31 20:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293679) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293679&action=view) Potential icon source (In reply to comment #1) > --delete-original not needed in desktop-file-install Strictly speaking, no. But I'd rather be pedantic about it. > Do you got any icon to install for this desktop file? Nothing official, but I was considering carving one from the attached image generated by it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 02:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431154] New: Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Summary: Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/IMDbPY/IMDbPY.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/IMDbPY/IMDbPY-3.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: IMDbPY is a Python package useful to retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database. IMDbPY is mainly a tool intended for programmers and developers, but some example scripts are included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 02:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010214.m112EFRo017465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at silug.org ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-01-31 21:14 EST ------- The latest amavisd-new requires this module. Leif, either you need to get this review moving soon, or I'll have to close this and open a review request for my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 02:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] New: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid-2.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Ruby OpenID library, with batteries included. A Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities. Ruby OpenID makes it easy to add OpenID authentication to your web applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 02:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010228.m112SbKs023917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-31 21:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 02:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429081] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010225.m112P7X8023569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-31 21:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 03:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010301.m1131EBd028633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-31 22:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=293679) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293679&action=view) [edit] > Potential icon source OK > > (In reply to comment #1) > > --delete-original not needed in desktop-file-install > > Strictly speaking, no. But I'd rather be pedantic about it. > Anyway, Not a blocker for review. > > Do you got any icon to install for this desktop file? > > Nothing official, but I was considering carving one from the attached image > generated by it. Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 03:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010304.m1134i01024538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-31 22:04 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. e578104d433f48639d9cf73aade1ae9e ghost-diagrams-0.8.py + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. - %doc files NOT present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. SHOULD: Good if some kind of documentation say README included in next release. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 03:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010311.m113BvTS025910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-31 22:11 EST ------- waiting for your updated SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 03:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] New: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rnorwood at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/mathmap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/mathmap-1.2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MathMap is a GIMP plug-in which allows distortion of images specified by mathematical formulae. For each pixel in the generated image, an expression is evaluated which should return a pixel value. The expression can either refer to a pixel in the source image or can generate pixels completely independent of the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 03:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010327.m113RugP028459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-31 22:27 EST ------- There are unfortunately a few rpmlint warnings: mathmap.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gimp/2.0/mathmap/new_template.c mathmap.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gimp/2.0/mathmap/blender_opmacros.h mathmap.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gimp/2.0/mathmap/pools.h mathmap.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gimp/2.0/mathmap/opmacros.h mathmap.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/gimp/2.0/mathmap/blender_template.c These seem to be required for the plugin to work at runtime, despite being source files. mathmap.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/mathmap /usr/bin/mathmap Not sure if this matters. mathmap.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I don't think I can fix this, because the gimp plugin path isn't picked by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 05:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010517.m115Hehx018746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-01 00:17 EST ------- New package: http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/event-compat-sysv-0.3.9-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/event-compat-sysv.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 05:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010518.m115IG9G014092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-01 00:18 EST ------- New package: http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/upstart-0.3.9-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/upstart.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 05:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 00:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010559.m115xujt024278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-01 00:59 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CSS-Squish Short Description: Compact many CSS files into one big file Owners: corsepiu Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 06:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010607.m1167tWY026057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 01:07 EST ------- SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo-0.3.0-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo.spec Bump to 0.3.0 The libical work still hasn't gone upstream, I suspect this would need to conflict with our system libical untill that happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 06:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010610.m116AiPQ021951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 06:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010613.m116DYZ1026879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 ivazqueznet at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ivazqueznet at gmail.com 2008-02-01 01:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghost-diagrams Short Description: A program that generates patterns from tiles Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 06:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 01:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010627.m116RGvM024269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-02-01 01:27 EST ------- I'll poke through this tomorrow if no one wants to do so before then. :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 07:32:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010732.m117WN6v000980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mono-basic-1.2.6-4.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 02:32 EST ------- This is in the repos now, CLOSING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 07:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010730.m117UwGe000888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mono-zeroconf-0.7.5-2.fc9 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 02:30 EST ------- This is the repos now, CLOSING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 07:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010737.m117bxgg006608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 pravi.a at ippimail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pravi.a at ippimail.com ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-02-01 02:37 EST ------- Parag, that looks like a strange request to me (coming from debian background). If the package is of good quality and people want to use it, what stops it from being included in the repository? It would be definitely good for people to review other people's work but that should not be a condition for including this work (again the way debian does it looks right to me). It is a very important package and delay in getting it included would not help anyone. If the packaging meets the quality requirements of Fedora project I hope to see it accepted soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 07:48:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 02:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430265] Review Request: hgsvn - A set of scripts to work locally on subversion checkouts using mercurial In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010748.m117mWB7003089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hgsvn - A set of scripts to work locally on subversion checkouts using mercurial https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430265 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-01 02:48 EST ------- available in rawhide, pushed to testing i f-7 and f-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010826.m118Qp2Q008986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:26 EST ------- Blocking this review for Sponsor Needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:36:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225862] Merge Review: gsf-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010836.m118aEiN010473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsf-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225862 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:36 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package name : gsf-sharp Updated Initial Owner : laxathom Comment : Taking over ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:42:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010842.m118gQbN011349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:42 EST ------- CVS Change Request ================== Package name : mono Updated Initial Owner : laxathom Comment : Taking over ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010847.m118lQNs012186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 03:47 EST ------- SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/podsleuth-0.6.0-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/podsleuth.spec Fixed: Added a note that parallel build breaks Excluded ppc64 Fixed file permissions Notes: omission of debug symbols is intentional gac registation does not appear to be needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226009] Merge Review: libgdiplus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010849.m118nrTj017405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgdiplus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226009 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:49 EST ------- CVS Change Resquest =================== Pacakge name : libgdiplus Updated Initial Owner : laxathom Comment : taking over ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010852.m118qhnJ018174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 03:52 EST ------- I've created the following for testing: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/banshee-0.13.2-3.fc8.src.rpm http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/ipod-sharp-0.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm You'll also need taglib-sharp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430393 and the latest mono-zeroconf: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=33766 As soon as podsleuth and taglib-sharp pass reviews I plan to start work on getting banshee 0.13.2 into the stable repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010851.m118pcTx018048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:51 EST ------- Requesting any peoples watching this review to feel free to sponsor this package submitter. About sponsoring someone, I prefer to follow => "The best ways for you to illustrate your understanding of the packaging guidelines are to submit quality packages and to assist with package reviews. Prospective sponsors will want to see what reviews you have done, so go ahead and tell them when you submit your first package review request and add comments to your open review ticket with information about your activities." ---from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored "So what's the downside to sponsoring someone? By sponsoring someone, you are committing to the fact that if they break something you will fix it (or help them in fixing it)." ---from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Or good if you package hunspell-ml and swanlekha also and submit to Fedora, that will be easy for sponsoring you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225874] Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010856.m118uKOf013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225874 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-02-01 03:56 EST ------- CVS Change Resquest =================== Package name : gtk-sharp2 Updated Initial Owner : laxathom Comment : Taking over ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430393] Review Request: taglib-sharp - Multimedia tagging library for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010855.m118tfYq013866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taglib-sharp - Multimedia tagging library for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430393 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 03:55 EST ------- Adding Paul Johnson to CC Paul would you mind doing a review of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 08:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 03:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010855.m118tcja018789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-01 03:55 EST ------- Adding Paul Johnson to CC Paul would you mind doing a review of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 09:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] New: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys-0.9.8.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Xhotkeys provides a simple and easily configurable hotkey launcher for the X-Window System, binding keys and mouse buttons to configurable commands. It should work on all desktops (Gnome, KDE, Xfce, ...) available for the GNU/Linux operating system. Configuration files can be modified manually or using a graphical GTK+ configurator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 10:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011001.m11A1TFP026017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2008-02-01 05:01 EST ------- Oops, Konrad, so sorry I gave you the wrong traces in last comment. So, please forget them. Here are the good ones: D: running pre-transaction scripts D: computing 5 file fingerprints Preparing... D: computing file dispositions D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames create mode=0x42 ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-4.fc8 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: May free Score board((nil)) [root at akt i386]# echo $? 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 09:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:58:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802010958.m119wSoA025139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2008-02-01 04:58 EST ------- Ok, this is exactly what I suspected: tried to change the README file delivered by tunables-base-data, and here's the result I got: D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Name create mode=0x42 D: read h# 913 Header SHA1 digest: OK (4c878e96685b21513e679f21dc15cc800d901239) D: read h# 917 Header SHA1 digest: OK (16ffc11b812ff117879d896cc00e7e5ac100d998) D: computing 5 file fingerprints Preparing... D: computing file dispositions D: opening db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames create mode=0x42 ########################################### [100%] package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 is already installed file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-4.fc8 file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Basenames D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Name D: closed db index /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: closed db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages D: May free Score board((nil)) [root at akt i386]# echo $? 1 So sounds like it is normal to be able to install a newer version over an older one without conflicts problems, given that the common files have the same contents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 10:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011012.m11ACFac006771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 lmb at biosci.ki.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(lmb at biosci.ki.se) | ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2008-02-01 05:12 EST ------- Ok, how does this look? Spec URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM.spec SRPM URL: http://83.140.35.234/perl-Mail-DKIM-0.30.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 10:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430418] Review Request: gt - Modified Timidity which supportes enhanced gus format patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011038.m11Acm8t000366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt - Modified Timidity which supportes enhanced gus format patches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430418 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 05:38 EST ------- Closing as gt is now in dist-f9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 10:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430418] Review Request: gt - Modified Timidity which supportes enhanced gus format patches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011039.m11Ad1NV000405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gt - Modified Timidity which supportes enhanced gus format patches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430418 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 10:39:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 05:39:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011039.m11Ad2iO000433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 Bug 430417 depends on bug 430418, which changed state. Bug 430418 Summary: Review Request: gt - Modified Timidity which supportes enhanced gus format patches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430418 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] New: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/libitl.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/libitl-0.6.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Islamic Tools and Libraries (ITL) is a project to provide a plethora of useful Islamic tools and applications as well as a comprehensive feature-full Islam-centric library. The ITL project currently includes Hijri date, Muslim prayer times, and Qibla. This package contains the libraries for applications using ITL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011106.m11B67cR016540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 06:06 EST ------- Rebuild failed... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=388735 Perhaps some typo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011124.m11BOA44007939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 06:24 EST ------- For 2.0.3-1: * Unneeded CFLAGS - export CFLAGS=... can be (and should be) removed because this is noarch package. ! Check - Please add: ------------------------------------------------------------ %check export RUBYLIB=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{ruby_sitelib} # some tests need net connection ruby setup.rb test || : ------------------------------------------------------------ Some tests need net connection and they fail, however IMO it is better not to skip all tests because of net connection missing. ? Documents split ------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ruby-openid-2.0.3]$ du -sh lib/ 380K lib/ [tasaka1 at localhost ruby-openid-2.0.3]$ du -sh doc/ 3.7M doc/ -------------------------------------------------------------- - The size of openid module itself is only 380K, while the size of documents is about 10 times of that. You may want to split documents files to a subpackage rpm? ? Examples - Would you consider to add files under examples/ to %doc? I don't know well about Ruby on Rails, however it seems that there are some useful examples for RoR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011129.m11BTPNv008706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-01 06:29 EST ------- Hi Ian, I cannot sponsor you, but I can unofficially review your package. rpm was build successfully from srpm and rpmlint didn't complain anything. Your spec file also look fine for me, except the point that you are putting the man file in directory "%{_mandir}/manl" (read man-el), not "man1" (read man-one). Is that intended, or a typo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:30:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011130.m11BUiG8020177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-01 06:30 EST ------- I've reviewed another package, here - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011146.m11Bke5J011667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-01 06:46 EST ------- Hi Krzysztof, I cannot sponsor you, but I'm unofficially reviewing your package. Your spec looks fine, rpmlint doesn't complain about anything and building the rpm was just fine. So I guess your packaging is just perfect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011147.m11Bl5LD022729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-01 06:47 EST ------- Another one - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 11:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 06:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011152.m11Bqfj7023590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 06:52 EST ------- Okay. - This package (flam3) itself is now okay, except for the following * The line ----------------------------------------------------------- %patch2 -p1 -b flam3-genome.c -b flam3.c -b private.h ----------------------------------------------------------- is somewhat confusing. Just writing ----------------------------------------------------------- %patch1 -p1 -b .remove_config_h ----------------------------------------------------------- or so is enough. - Your another review request (bug 430441) needs some fix, however I will accept it for initial draft. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (flam3) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011206.m11C6oav026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-01 07:06 EST ------- rajeesh, Thanks for looking those 2 packages. But sorry to say thats not enough review of checking rpm is building and rpmlint is silent. Just have a look at what should you look while reviewing any package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines For https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 review, I don't see any problem installing in manl directory as its one of standard directory of man pages. Just have a look at /usr/share/man/manl/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:08:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011208.m11C8X5i015542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 07:08 EST ------- I meant: %patch2 -p1 -b .remove_config_h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011213.m11CD8PX016280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-01 07:13 EST ------- Nope it got build on a ppc and unsf (part of soundfont-utils / gt) says: "Error: bad SoundFont header" So there seem to be some endian issues in unsf, I'm looking into this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011226.m11CQCnt018486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:26:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011226.m11CQD2t018508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431186 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011225.m11CPdn6018412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-01 07:25 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=388797 >From build log it looked like you need to include some BRs Warning: prerequisite HTML::FormatText 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTML::PrettyPrinter 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTML::TreeBuilder 0 not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:25:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] New: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 Summary: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/itools.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/itools-0.6.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Islamic Tools and Libraries (ITL) is a project to provide a plethora of useful Islamic tools and applications as well as a comprehensive feature-full Islam-centric library. The ITL project currently includes Hijri date, Muslim prayer times, and Qibla. This package contains several command line tools written using ITL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011227.m11CRB8c029509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 ------- Additional Comments From timc at inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-02-01 07:27 EST ------- Updated review versions now available at: Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SPECS/shezhu.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SRPMS/shezhu-1.20-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] New: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar-0.2.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Minbar is a GNOME GUI with tray icon, for athan call and notifications for Islam prayer times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011249.m11CnVPU022343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 12:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 07:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011249.m11CnWZU022364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431188 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 13:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011304.m11D4u44025595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-01 08:04 EST ------- Ok, thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 13:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011306.m11D6fuj004319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-01 08:06 EST ------- Thanks for the quick reply, Parag. By mentioning 'spec file looks fine' on each of them, what I meant is all the MUST and SHOULD are satisfied. Had there been any discrepancy, I would have mentioned it clearly. If you want me to pinpoint each of the points, I can. For #430441, I wasn't sure whether /usr/share/man/manl/ is a valid one or not. Thanks a lot for the clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 13:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011313.m11DDK0Z027250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-01 08:13 EST ------- I updated the package: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop.spec http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm ad 1) latencytop-standard-cflags.patch now removes the extra whitespace. ad 2) Arjan van de Ven agreed to provide the COPYING file in the future. I noticed another problem with the program. Targeted SELinux policy denies write access to /proc/*/{sched,latency} even to unconfined_t processes. I'll file a bug in the policy and see what Dan Walsh thinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 13:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011330.m11DUSlP008328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge. | |net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 13:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011357.m11Dva8x012966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 08:57 EST ------- Well, ================================================================================ Whole license: SISSL source/3rdparty/adoc/ GPL+ source/3rdparty/fnmatch/ BSD with advertising source/3rdparty/openssl/ OpenSSL source/3rdparty/qidl/ copyright only source/3rdparty/qmake/ GPL+ source/3rdparty/qmake/alloca.c Public Domain? source/3rdparty/qmake/amiga.c GPLv2+ (and others) source/3rdparty/qmon/Xbae/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/Xmt310/ BSD source/3rdparty/qmon/iconlist/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/ltree/ LGPL+ source/3rdparty/qmon/spinbox/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/tab/ MIT source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ BSD with advertising source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ma.setp.c MIT source/3rdparty/sge_depend/ MIT source/3rdparty/snprintf/ the Frontier Artistic License source/3rdparty/strptime/ BSD with advertising source/scripts/ldAix MIT ------------------------------------------------------- source/3rdparty/adoc/ - Not used source/3rdparty/qmake/ - not linked to gridengine binaries ================================================================================ Removing FE-Legal! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 14:15:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011415.m11EFYgF006601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-01 09:15 EST ------- - Correct install section - Correct files section Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys-0.9.8.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 14:24:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011424.m11EOZEO008065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-01 09:24 EST ------- How did I let that pass thru ? Fixed in : Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Net-eBay.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Net-eBay-0.45-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 14:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011437.m11EbAho010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 Bug 428566 depends on bug 430559, which changed state. Bug 430559 Summary: Requires: libglade-2.0 (in libgnomeui-2.0.pc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430559 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 14:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011453.m11ErG6X023788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-01 09:53 EST ------- libvncserver-0.9.1-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 14:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011453.m11ErLxv013947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-01 09:53 EST ------- libvncserver-0.9.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:26:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011526.m11FQVc6021119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-01 10:26 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru! Now, any idea what the License tag should be? Still just SISSL? Also: * Thu Jan 31 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 6.1u3-2 - Actually ship sge_execd in the execd subpackage - Don't complain about missing sge_execd during inst_sge -upd - Link in db_dump and db_load into utilbin so that update scripts can find them http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-2.fedora.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431216] New: Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431216 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac.spec Description: This widget provides a dynamic image that looks just like a Mac OS 9 progress bar. Packed around it are four Frames, north, south, east and west, within which you can stuff additional widgets. For example, see how Tk::Copy::Mac uses several Labels and a CollapsableFrame widget to create a reasonable facsimile of a Macintosh copy dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431215] New: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431215 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-Stderr-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-Stderr.spec Description: This module captures that standard error of a program and redirects it to a read only text widget, which doesn't appear until necessary. When it does appear, the user can close it; it'll appear again when there is more output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:36:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:36:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431217] New: Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431217 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-FileDialog-1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Spec URL: http://sharkcz.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Tk-FileDialog.spec Description: Tk::FileDialog is a perl5 package which implements a File Selector widget. To use Tk::FileDialog, you will need Perl version 5.002 or better, and Tk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011541.m11FfL0N023992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:42:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011542.m11FghMl024241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 10:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293735) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293735&action=view) rpmlint log for 6.1u3-1 binary rpms Well, actually I was checking 6.1u3-1, so anyway I write comments on 6.1u3-1 for now. Will you merge the fix for -1 to -2 and upload new -3 srpm later? First comment on 6.1u3-1: scrartch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=380936 A. rpmlint for src.rpm * Source file permission --------------------------------------------------------------- gridengine.src: W: strange-permission arch 0755 gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sgemaster 0755 gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sge.csh 0755 gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sge.sh 0755 gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sgeexecd 0755 --------------------------------------------------------------- - All source files must have 0644 permission. Change the permission when installing them if needed. B. For spec file: B-2: %prep * Source file override --------------------------------------------------------------- cp source/dist/util/arch %SOURCE8 --------------------------------------------------------------- - Source file must not be overwritten. If you want to "define" sgearch, you can do like --------------------------------------------------------------- %install sgearch=`sh source/dist/util/arch` --------------------------------------------------------------- B-3: %build * java_home --------------------------------------------------------------- export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java --------------------------------------------------------------- - Please consider to use %java_home macro (defined by %_sysconfdir/rpm/macros.jpackage in jpackage-utils, required by java-1.5.0-gcj-devel) B-4: %install * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. B-5: %files * Macros - %_sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d must be replaced with %_initrddir. C. rpmlint Only checked for binary rpms (not checked for actually installed rpms), but many rpmlint complaints... (attached) SUMMARY: * E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share - arch dependent file must not be under %_datadir. A possible resolution is to move arch dependent files to under %_libexecdir and make a symlink against them. * E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath - Remove strange rpath from binaries * W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package - Would you explain why these files are in gridengine, not in gridengine-devel package? * E: executable-marked-as-config-file - Executables must be not marked as %config file (even if they are under %_sysconfdir) * E: missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword * W: no-reload-entry * E: no-status-entry - Rewrite initrd script to make it more LSB compliant. * E: non-executable-script - Scripts without executable permission should not have shebangs. * E: script-without-shebang - Script with executable permission should have shebangs. * W: spurious-executable-perm - source files in debuginfo rpm must have 0644 permission You should fix this by changing permission of files under $RPM_BUILD_DIR. W: summary-not-capitalized - Summary must begin with captal letters. W: symlink-should-be-relative - Change symlinks from absolute to relative for chroot issues and so on. D. build.log * Fedora specific compilation flags - On some parts, fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. On i386: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14777 _________3_r_d_p_a_r_t_y__Q_M_A_K_E_______ 14778 make all-recursive 14779 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26' 14780 Making all in glob 14781 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26/glob' 14782 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../glob -I.. -g -O2 -c ../../glob/glob.c 14783 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../glob -I.. -g -O2 -c ../../glob/fnmatch.c 14784 rm -f libglob.a 14785 ar cru libglob.a glob.o fnmatch.o 14786 ranlib libglob.a 14787 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26/glob' 14788 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26' 14789 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-error -DLINUX -c ../main.c 14790 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-error -DLINUX -c ../commands.c ........... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ F. etc * Clean up binaries under %_bindir - Would you clean up unneeded binaries under %_bindir (if any)? * Especially, qt-devel has %_libdir/qt-3.3/bin/qmake in $PATH and "which qmake" always returns qt-devel qmake. IMO %_bindir/qmake should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011546.m11FkLGs025251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 10:46 EST ------- i looked at the xautolock man page and it was XAUTOLOCK(l), as in el. so i'm presuming this is correct, and it is intentionally done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011544.m11FilLY024611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks Mamoru! Now, any idea what the License tag should be? Still just SISSL? It depends on whether we ship qmake or not, so we should determine the tag later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011550.m11FoXdk026119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 10:50 EST ------- Now for rebuilding this it seems happy with new gt, however would you check the build.log? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=389084 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=389085&name=build.log Are the messages like: Strange... no valid layers found in instrument GrandPiano bank 0 prog 0 Could not create patch GrandPiano for bank PCLite-B0 layer 1 of 1 layer(s) as you expect? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011555.m11FtfhC027080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 ------- Additional Comments From dwinship at redhat.com 2008-02-01 10:55 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293736) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293736&action=view) patch to adjust 2.2.x doc install dir the next libsoup 2.4 release will install its docs into /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/libsoup-2.4/. This patch makes 2.2.104 install its docs into .../libsoup-2.2/, if you'd rather do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 15:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011559.m11FxO9O027413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 dwinship at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwinship at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dwinship at redhat.com 2008-02-01 10:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > The tests require a running apache server... that's not really practical. (They don't require a *running* apache server; they just require that apache be installed, and then they start it themselves, with a custom httpd.conf.) > So if httpd is not installed, make check simply skips these tests. > Actually I have not httpd installed and "make check" of libsoup22 > does 6 checks. Yeah, and since you only need to test "did the package build correctly", not "does all of the code still work correctly", then running just the non-apache-using tests is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 16:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011600.m11G0UiZ004550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 11:00 EST ------- By the way, if you want to try to rebuild your arbitrary srpm on koji, you can do it by $ koji build --scratch where currencly can be either dist-f9, dist-f8-updates-candidate or dist-fc7-updates-candidate (and some special target). If the build is successful, the rebuilt binaries rpms and some logs are put under http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 16:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011608.m11G8OJK006529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-01 11:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/build_tools/waf.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/build_tools/waf-1.3.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Applied fix for check_tools('gnome'), nothing else changed. Thanks, Thomas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 16:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011613.m11GDr5e007853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-01 11:13 EST ------- I filed bug 431221 for the SELinux policy issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 16:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011631.m11GVYqq002256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-01 11:31 EST ------- Thanks, I also did a scratch build ymself, but that ended up on an intel builder, then I tried again, but the upload to koji is slow from here. I I know whats causing this (the messages aren't normal). PPC has char default to unsigned . A believed fixed gt build is on its way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 16:58:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:58:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011658.m11Gwrx4015519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-01 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Parag, that looks like a strange request to me (coming from debian background). > If the package is of good quality and people want to use it, what stops it from > being included in the repository? > > It would be definitely good for people to review other people's work but that > should not be a condition for including this work (again the way debian does it > looks right to me). There are multiple differences and it wouldn't be suitable to expand on all of that in a review request but briefly, Fedora sponsors the submitter (as opposed to just the package) and then gives commit and upload access to not only the individual package but nearly the entire repository. So it make sense for the proposed maintainer to demonstrate reasonable amount of understanding of packaging guidelines. The way they demonstrate that understanding is by reviewing other packages before getting sponsored. This process is comparatively very light weight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225862] Merge Review: gsf-sharp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011727.m11HRhOn012389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gsf-sharp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225862 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:27 EST ------- This appears to already have been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:28:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:28:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225874] Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011728.m11HSjcX020702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtk-sharp2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225874 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:28 EST ------- This appears to already have been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011732.m11HWXYj013297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428113 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011732.m11HWSjg013236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:32 EST ------- Appears to be done. Note that on the mailing list David Nielsen already said he would maintain this package. Please check with him and make sure he's got the access he needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Text-Format.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Text-Format-0.52-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The format routine will format under all circumstances even if the width isn't enough to contain the longest words. Text::Wrap will die under these circumstances, although I am told this is fixed. If columns is set to a small number and words are longer than that and the leading 'whitespace' than there will be a single word on each line. This will let you make a simple word list which could be indented or right aligned. There is a chance for croaking if you try to subvert the module. If you don't pass in text then the internal text is worked on, though not modified. Text::Format is meant for more powerful text formatting than Text::Wrap allows. I also have a module called Text::NWrap that is meant as a direct replacement for Text::Wrap. Text::NWrap requires Text::Format since it uses Text::Format->format to do the actual wrapping but gives you the interface of Text::Wrap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011732.m11HWW3q013275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431237 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-01 12:32 EST ------- One Requires: was missing from the repos too, bug #431237. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226009] Merge Review: libgdiplus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011729.m11HTkJt020773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libgdiplus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226009 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:29 EST ------- This appears to already be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011735.m11HZsBH014040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 17:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011746.m11HkZ01023897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 12:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431215] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011804.m11I4ZBR018486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431215 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-01 13:04 EST ------- This fails to build for me in mock: + make test _XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not be created. _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root SELinux: Invalid object class mapping, disabling SELinux support. PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/1....dubious Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb) DIED. FAILED test 2 Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/1.t 0 11 2 2 100.00% 2 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 1/2 subtests failed, 50.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 Are you sure it's possible to run the test suite without having X present? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011817.m11IHUM3020959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 13:17 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:27:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431216] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011827.m11IRcYY022801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431216 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-01 13:27 EST ------- This one fails to build in mock for me as well: + make test _XSERVTransmkdir: ERROR: euid != 0,directory /tmp/.X11-unix will not be created. _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root SELinux: Invalid object class mapping, disabling SELinux support. PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..12 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Fri Feb 1 13:09:14 2008 # Current time GMT: Fri Feb 1 18:09:14 2008 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 ok 4 make: *** [test_dynamic] Segmentation fault error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.69578 (%check) That failure is odd enough that I did a scratch build, and it fails identically: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=389487 Could I suggest that you consider doing scratch builds of your packages before submission? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011827.m11IR0Yw030630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(geoff at programmer- | |monk.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011829.m11ITidH030825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-01 13:29 EST ------- For #4, there is a patch in bug 431110 for sysvinit, if you want it for testing. I suppose at some point those should move to util-linux or similar, but that's beyond the scope of this. See also the 'upstart' meta-bug tracker. Changes added address issues #1, #2, above. #5 is a run-of-the-mill bug, not relevant to packaging. Do you need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:36:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011836.m11IaXcX024713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-01 13:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293754) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293754&action=view) patch for gcc-4.3 This is needed to build with gcc-4.3 - a missing #include. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011833.m11IXbCU024010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-01 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > 1) I don't think it belongs in initscripts. If anything it could merge into > upstart but I chose not to do this since technically a sysadmin could opt to > write his own events from scratch and not install any event scripts at all > (you'd have to assume he enjoyed pain, but its possible). Well, you could do the same for the base scripts for sysvinit as well (inittab, /etc/rc.sysinit) yet, we shipped those in initscripts. As to the new version: - #2 fixed - Obsoletes need versioned. Otherwise, you're obsoleteing yourself due to the later Provides: - #6 is still an issue with the new packages. However, that's more a bug than a packaging issue. Licensing is still a review blocker; any response from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:39:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:39:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431217] Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011839.m11Idx7a025044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431217 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-01 13:39 EST ------- This one builds. rpmlint says: perl-Tk-FileDialog.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-Tk-FileDialog.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL Please use the license tag "GPL+ or Artistic" for Perl modules distributed "under the same terms as Perl itself". http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Wow, the upstream source hasn't been updated in twelve years. Are you sure this is a good idea? You might consider removing that comment after the BuildArch: line; comments from the templates aren't generally useful in the actual packages. Really, the only blocker I see is the License: tag, which you can fix up when you check in. * source files match upstream: 58061c10c605ba951ed1215e86e7fc69f08e6bf2222295963729ccc2bb84e1e4 Tk-FileDialog-1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Tk::FileDialog) = 1.3 perl-Tk-FileDialog = 1.3-1.fc9 = perl >= 0:5.002 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Tk) perl(Tk::Dialog) perl(strict) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just fix up the License: tag to "GPL+ or Artistic". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:41:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011841.m11IfCwp000722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 18:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011856.m11IunHx003317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-01 13:56 EST ------- Yes, I do need a sponsor. Also, 5 Works For Me, so not sure what's going wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:08:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:08:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011908.m11J85TF007930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-01 14:08 EST ------- I have an email out to Scott, and I'm watching IRC to see if he shows up there sooner. The new package should start all ttys now. They still are set to start early though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] New: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rkhadgar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish-1.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Sawfish is an extensible window manager which uses a Lisp-based scripting language. All window decorations are configurable and the basic idea is to have as much user-interface policy as possible controlled through the Lisp language. Configuration can be accomplished by writing Lisp code in a personal .sawfishrc file, or using a GTK+ interface. Sawfish is mostly GNOME compliant This is my first package, and i need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011909.m11J93ls008250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-01 14:09 EST ------- Hmm, another decade-old Perl module. There seems to be a rash of them lately. * source files match upstream: 3790c5bc7b5f66d1264fd013050c2097b5867bc737dc6c676d0794a3984aa9a1 Text-Format0.52.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Text::Format) = 0.52 perl-Text-Format = 0.52-1.fc9 = perl >= 0:5.003 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=13, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.02 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011917.m11JHxwM012246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 rkhadgar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431250, 431251 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011917.m11JHxao012266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 rkhadgar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431249 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011918.m11JI0Mg012288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 rkhadgar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431249 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:15:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] New: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rkhadgar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17-2.svn20071102.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a lightweight Lisp environment for UNIX. It contains a Lisp interpreter, byte-code compiler and virtual machine. Applications may use the Lisp interpreter as an extension language, or it may be used for standalone scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431251] New: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rkhadgar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18-2.svn20060131.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a binding of GTK+ for the librep Lisp interpreter. It is based on Marius Vollmer's guile-gtk package (initially version 0.15, updated to 0.17), with a new glue-code generator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011933.m11JXZbb015221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-01 14:33 EST ------- Actually, now that I read a bit more clisely, I would also recommend removing the last two sentences of %description, as they're not really descriptive of this module: I also have a module called Text::NWrap that is meant as a direct replacement for Text::Wrap. Text::NWrap requires Text::Format since it uses Text::Format->format to do the actual wrapping but gives you the interface of Text::Wrap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 19:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802011958.m11JwmbV011933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-01 14:58 EST ------- Thanks for the review, Jason. I will fix the description after importing the package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Format Short Description: Various subroutines to format text Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 20:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012029.m11KTUqN025147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 20:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012029.m11KTCL9017320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 21:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012159.m11LxhY4008446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-01 16:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 22:35:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:35:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012235.m11MZlmJ015075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-01 17:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Created an attachment (id=293735) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293735&action=view) [edit] > rpmlint log for 6.1u3-1 binary rpms > > Well, actually I was checking 6.1u3-1, so anyway > I write comments on 6.1u3-1 for now. Will you merge the > fix for -1 to -2 and upload new -3 srpm later? > Yup. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-3.fc8.src.rpm > First comment on 6.1u3-1: > scrartch build is here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=380936 > > A. rpmlint for src.rpm > * Source file permission > --------------------------------------------------------------- > gridengine.src: W: strange-permission arch 0755 > gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sgemaster 0755 > gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sge.csh 0755 > gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sge.sh 0755 > gridengine.src: W: strange-permission sgeexecd 0755 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > - All source files must have 0644 permission. > Change the permission when installing them if needed. Fixed the last 4. See below for arch. > B. For spec file: > B-2: %prep > * Source file override > --------------------------------------------------------------- > cp source/dist/util/arch %SOURCE8 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > - Source file must not be overwritten. > If you want to "define" sgearch, you can do like > --------------------------------------------------------------- > %install > sgearch=`sh source/dist/util/arch` > --------------------------------------------------------------- The problem is I need %{sgearch} in the %files section as well. Suggestions? > B-3: %build > * java_home > --------------------------------------------------------------- > export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java > --------------------------------------------------------------- > - Please consider to use %java_home macro > (defined by %_sysconfdir/rpm/macros.jpackage in jpackage-utils, > required by java-1.5.0-gcj-devel) Done. > B-4: %install > * Timestamps > - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option > to keep timestamps on installed files. Done. > B-5: %files > * Macros > - %_sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d must be replaced with %_initrddir. Done. > C. rpmlint > Only checked for binary rpms (not checked for actually installed > rpms), but many rpmlint complaints... (attached) > SUMMARY: > > * E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > - arch dependent file must not be under %_datadir. A possible resolution > is to move arch dependent files to under %_libexecdir and make a symlink > against them. Fixed. > * E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > - Remove strange rpath from binaries Fixed. > * W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > - Would you explain why these files are in gridengine, not in > gridengine-devel package? Moved. > * E: executable-marked-as-config-file > - Executables must be not marked as %config file (even if they are > under %_sysconfdir) Fixed. > * E: missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword > * W: no-reload-entry > * E: no-status-entry > - Rewrite initrd script to make it more LSB compliant. Working on these. I do think it's time to just completely rewrite these scripts. > * E: non-executable-script > - Scripts without executable permission should not have shebangs. Fixed. > * E: script-without-shebang > - Script with executable permission should have shebangs. Fixed. > * W: spurious-executable-perm > - source files in debuginfo rpm must have 0644 permission > You should fix this by changing permission of files under > $RPM_BUILD_DIR. Fixed. > W: summary-not-capitalized > - Summary must begin with captal letters. Fixed. > W: symlink-should-be-relative > - Change symlinks from absolute to relative for chroot issues and > so on. Fixed. > D. build.log > * Fedora specific compilation flags > - On some parts, fedora specific compilation flags are not honored > correctly. > On i386: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 14777 _________3_r_d_p_a_r_t_y__Q_M_A_K_E_______ > 14778 make all-recursive > 14779 make[1]: Entering directory > `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26' > 14780 Making all in glob > 14781 make[2]: Entering directory > `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26/glob' > 14782 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../glob -I.. -g -O2 -c > ../../glob/glob.c > 14783 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../glob -I.. -g -O2 -c > ../../glob/fnmatch.c > 14784 rm -f libglob.a > 14785 ar cru libglob.a glob.o fnmatch.o > 14786 ranlib libglob.a > 14787 make[2]: Leaving directory > `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26/glob' > 14788 make[2]: Entering directory > `/builddir/build/BUILD/gridengine/source/3rdparty/qmake/LINUX86_26' > 14789 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" > -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-error -DLINUX > -c ../main.c > 14790 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" > -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/local/include\" -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-error -DLINUX > -c ../commands.c > ........... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fixed. > F. etc > * Clean up binaries under %_bindir > - Would you clean up unneeded binaries under %_bindir (if any)? > * Especially, qt-devel has %_libdir/qt-3.3/bin/qmake in $PATH > and "which qmake" always returns qt-devel qmake. > IMO %_bindir/qmake should be removed. > qmake has been moved to %{_datadir}/gridengine/bin/%{sgearch}/. Others I would like to leave. I'm building in koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=390203 Thanks for the review! Sorry to have left so many issues... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 22:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] New: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mark at fasheh.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-4.20080131git.src.rpm Description: Ocfs2 is a shared disk cluster file system which has been included in the mainline Linux kernel since 2.6.16. The module is currently built as part of the standard Fedora kernel. This is a set of tools useful for managing an Ocfs2 file system. The package also includes "ocfs2console", a gui application which makes configuration of Ocfs2 clusters easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 22:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:46:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012246.m11MkYSU019541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-01 17:46 EST ------- The package builds successfully on my x86_64 and i386 systems. Rpmlint is clean on the spec file, the SRPM, the ocfs2console rpm and the debuginfo rpm. On ocfs2-tools-devel-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm I get: $ rpmlint ocfs2-tools-devel-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm ocfs2-tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Which I believe should be fine as no documentation is provided upstream. On ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm I get: $ rpmlint ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ocfs2 ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ocfs2 ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/o2cb ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/o2cb ocfs2-tools.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/o2cb I believe an exception should be made in that the Ocfs2 cluster services should be enabled by default. It's common for a user to have critical software loaded at boot from an Ocfs2 file system and leaving the services off by default (thus making their file systems unmountable) violates the principal of least surprise, and could actually result in a loss of availability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 23:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012307.m11N7HjO014606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-01 18:07 EST ------- As for the init script, it would seem to be logical that it just be added to the list of types in netfs, or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 23:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012305.m11N5fqh023262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-01 18:05 EST ------- AutoReqProv: No <- why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 23:36:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012336.m11Nahqr027976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-01 18:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > AutoReqProv: No <- why? It's completely unnecessary. A new spec file and srpm without AutoReqProv have been uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 1 23:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:41:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802012341.m11NflvM028774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From joel.becker at oracle.com 2008-02-01 18:41 EST ------- Regarding the init script, do you mean the ocfs2.init script that mounts and unmounts ocfs2 volumes? The o2cb.init script needs to be run in any case, so I'm assuming you mean ocfs2.init, which is indeed similar to netfs. If the modifications to netfs would be accepted (I'd assume copying the NFS bits), I think that would be excellent and ocfs2.init would not need to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020005.m12052Jd023506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-01 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > As for the init script, it would seem to be logical that it just be added to the > list of types in netfs, or similar. Looking at gfs2-utils, they seem to do the same thing as Ocfs2 (no mention of Gfs2 in /etc/init.d/netfs either). >From /etc/init.d/gfs2: start) if [ -n "$GFS2FSTAB" ] then action $"Mounting GFS2 filesystems: " mount -a -t gfs2 fi touch /var/lock/subsys/gfs2 ;; Can we do it this way until netfs is fixed up to understand Ocfs2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:05:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020005.m1205oZH032568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-02-01 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > So this is back in the pool. Perhaps I'll find the time to look at it if nobody > beats me to it. If the package in comment 34 is the one you'd like reviewed, > please say so or go ahead and drop another package. Great that you want to help me to improve this package. > However, some things I didn't see mentioned before. One warning from > desktop-file-install during the package build: Fixed > lazarus.src: W: invalid-license GPL, MPL > lazarus.src: W: invalid-license modified LGPL > Please use proper License tags according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines. If the "modified > LGPL" in use doesn't fit any existing tags and something like "LGPLv2+ with > exceptions" isn't close enough then you will need to have the licensing experts > assign a new tag for you. I've asked on the fedora-legal-list and they said I should use the "LGPL+ with exceptions" tag with a note that it was in fact the GNU classpath-exception > lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/doc/cvs2cl.pl 0644 > lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/lazarus/examples/trayicon/createbundle.sh 0644 > lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/lazarus/components/lazreport/tools/localize.sh 0644 > Are you sure these shouldn't be executable? What will call them? First script is obsolete, but I added the execute-flag anyway. Second is a script used on OS/X only, so that shoudn't be executable. And the last script should indeed have the executable-flag set. Fixed. > lazarus.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/install/cross_unix/debian_crosswin32/postrm 0644 > I thought that according to comments above that this would be going away. I didn't saw these files. Removed them. > lazarus.x86_64: W: ldd-failed /usr/lib64/lazarus/tools/svn2revisioninc > I think this was covered in a discussion above about fpc output always being > static, and should be OK. I've made a new package with these changes: (build with f7, I have no other system available here atm): http://www.cnoc.nl/fpc/lazarus-0.9.24-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020045.m120jPXw005723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 19:45 EST ------- i've registered with the FAS. my username is ianweller. thanks! i'll also fix that line when i upload the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020054.m120s89T006692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 19:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293771) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293771&action=view) use datadir for noarch files and other fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020053.m120r7xV030286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 19:53 EST ------- I made some work on ncl to correct some issues I see. noarch stuff isn't in datadir, paths could be fixed. I ran into other issues while doing that. Here are the patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020054.m120soKg006749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 19:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293772) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293772&action=view) corresponding patch for Site.local, also use more rpm macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 00:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020056.m120upjP007294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 19:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293773) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293773&action=view) build file patch to install noarch files in NCARG_ROOT/share I think that this patch could go upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 01:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020101.m1211BJe008020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 20:01 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293774) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293774&action=view) don't have install depend on target I am not sure that it is right, but otherwise the in source libraries have ranlib rerun on them just before they are installed, causing the binaries that depend on these libraries to be relinked before installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 01:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020104.m1214HEb032106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 20:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293777) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293777&action=view) link against netcdff for fortran linking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 01:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020103.m12131xg031784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-01 20:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293776) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293776&action=view) specific build target are put after generic ones This allows to have the 'all' target be the first one, instead of one of the scripts target, such that the default is to remake all the scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 01:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020119.m121Jto3002441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-01 20:19 EST ------- libvncserver-0.9.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 01:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020119.m121Jv4T011067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020208.m1228fNP010139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 21:08 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 417711) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020208.m122863R010089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 21:08 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429081] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020219.m122JMbm020017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429081 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-02-01 21:19 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide; the rest following :) Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020219.m122JN3O020042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 Bug 411551 depends on bug 429081, which changed state. Bug 429081 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Oracle - Parse and format Oracle dates and timestamps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429081 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020227.m122RIDj012869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-02-01 21:27 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid-2.0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm Changes: - Remove CFLAGS in build section - Create ruby-openid-doc package for docs - Add examples for doc package - Remove zero-length files in doc package - Fix file-not-utf8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020227.m122R0il012813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-01 21:26 EST ------- I can't sponsor you but a quick review nevertheless: You can drop the Exclusiveos tag since this spec file is just for Fedora. Using a disttag is recommended http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag You must drop all BuildRequires that are part of the default build root such as bash. Refer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30-2 Why is there a Provides: ocfs2-tools-static = %{version}-%{release}? Can't you dynamically link libraries? If not, you should provide a justification for statically linking any libraries. Refer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 The buildroot is non-standard. Use one of the alternatives specified in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 /usr/share can be replaced by %{_datadir} and use %{_initrddir} instead of /etc/init.d and so on to avoid hard-coding patches wherever applicable. Refer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Python 2.5 path should not be hardcoded. You should use {python_sitelib} and other guidelines outlined in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Requires for ocfs2console and similar constructs should probably be {version} - {release} instead of just {version}. Use make %{?_smp_mflags} if possible. You might want to branch to EPEL 5 when you get approved. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:38:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:38:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020238.m122cx1h014200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 21:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flam3 Short Description: Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: ianweller Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020246.m122kBOc023859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 21:46 EST ------- Mamoru: is it also ok if i have wiki editing privileges? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020254.m122s5mY016004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 21:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flam3 Short Description: Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: ianweller Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 02:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020255.m122tTJE025271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 21:55 EST ------- Crud, I messed up the CVS request. Package Name should read `xautolock'. Here's a new one. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xautolock Short Description: Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: ianweller Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 03:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020309.m12393e9027333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 22:09 EST ------- Ah... no, even if you are sponsored, this request must be reviewed by someone. The difference is that as you are sponsored, this review request can be reviewed by non-sponsor members. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 03:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020313.m123DJUJ028058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-01 22:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #49) > Mamoru: is it also ok if i have wiki editing privileges? It should be okay (after you do some procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/WikiEditing ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 03:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020337.m123bvEC023052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-01 22:37 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 04:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020457.m124v65h002335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-01 23:57 EST ------- OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020501.m1251GA1011817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 00:01 EST ------- I've done that. I'm at the final step: "Contact Someone from the EditGroup -- Anyone listed on the EditGroup page may add you to the EditGroup. This is the group that has write access to most parts of the wiki. If you have already been talking to a contributor, ask them if they can add you." You are in the EditGroup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020529.m125TZBc016050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |417711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020529.m125TZPD016074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431290 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:25:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] New: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/qosmic/1.2-1/qosmic.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/qosmic/1.2-1/qosmic-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Qosmic is a nifty toy with which you can edit and render flam3 fractal images. It is comparable to Apophysis for Windows, with the same basic interface. Please note that this package requires flam3 to install and flam3-devel to build, both of which are currently only covered by bug #417711. The package has been approved but I'm still waiting for CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020528.m125SQiV006943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 00:28 EST ------- * Fri Feb 01 2008 Ian Weller 2.7.8-4 - Made patch commands less confusing Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/flam3/2.7.8-4/flam3.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/flam3/2.7.8-4/flam3-2.7.8-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 05:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020534.m125Yh0c016765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 00:34 EST ------- Builds OK and rpmlint is clean. Some comments: It seems that you have no choice but to run the autotools since upstream does not ship generated copies, but you should ask upstream to do this before creating your tarball. Otherwise there could be problems when the version of Fedora's autotools doesn't match what upstream expects to use. I do not see where the license version is specified. The source files seem to say "under LGPL license" but do not specify a version. The included COPYING file says only that you can use any version ever published in this case. So instead of LGPLv2 as you have, I think the license tag should be LGPLv2+. See this text from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing: ---- A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. ---- The unversioned .so file needs to be in the -devel package. This package installs a library into /usr/lib/itl but doesn't configure the linker to look into that directory. I haven't yet looked at the packages which use this library, but I'm not sure how that can work unless they open this library with dlopen() or they use rpath (which they probably shouldn't). In any case, the ldconfig calls are pointless in this case because they will not find the libraries you have added. Is there some reason this library needs to be in its own, separate directory? * source files match upstream: 169b03cf9a9d6c07ff49055666891562ae21256751c32a5ec99dfa4b574679af libitl-0.6.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libitl-0.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm libitl.so.0()(64bit) libitl = 0.6.4-1.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libitl.so.0()(64bit) libitl-devel-0.6.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm libitl-devel = 0.6.4-1.fc9 = libitl = 0.6.4-1.fc9 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. ? a shared library is installed, but not into a standard location; a call to ldconfig is pointless in this case. X unversioned .so files should be in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 09:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429749] Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020901.m1291mAC004254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvncserver - Library to make writing a vnc server easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429749 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-02 04:01 EST ------- libvncserver-0.9.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 09:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802020901.m1291F4U013276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-02 04:01 EST ------- vamp-plugin-sdk-1.1b-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vamp-plugin-sdk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-1243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021016.m12AGSFC017094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428228] Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021016.m12AGTKo017114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428228 Bug 428228 depends on bug 403741, which changed state. Bug 403741 Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021016.m12AG0ee017035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-02 05:15 EST ------- gzip xautolock.man should not be done in the spec, it is done automatically by rpmbuild. Also the permission for man page should be 0644. Man pages are automatically considered %doc. I personally prefer to use globs like %{_mandir}/manl/xautolock.l* to catch all possibility of compression and no compression. The l for man page is a bit strange. Currently on my box all the pages in manl are owned by lapack and blas (and the directory itself is not owned). So it is likely that it is an upstream mistake. It is not an issue for the review, but may be worth asking upstream if there is a typo in the man page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:17:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239184] Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021017.m12AH75I026606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021025.m12APHn7028053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 05:25 EST ------- Any news ? Not that if something is patented, we will need to remove DXT from our source package also. (usually this lead to create a script to do that and eventually provide an alternative location to download the source code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021031.m12AVRj0019702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-02 05:31 EST ------- To install the man page, there is a make target, install.man, and it installs in man1, so it is certainly a typo. I tested that the following works: make install install.man DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" Also for the build, the build flags are not the right ones. I found that the following works: make %{?_smp_mflags} CDEBUGFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CC=%{__cc} The summary is a bit too long in my opinion, but it is not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231011] Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021030.m12AUCAj028941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cowpatty - Audit Wpa pre-shared keys https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231011 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 05:30 EST ------- Do you think we can close this as wontfix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431237] Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021043.m12AhHdg021468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-02 05:43 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, F-8, EL-4 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:45:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021045.m12AjrWN022094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 05:45 EST ------- Well, it seems that zero-sizes under examples should not be needed. For example, examples/rails_openid_login_generator/openid_login_generator.rb contains: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 m.template "user_test.rb", "test/unit/user_test.rb" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021043.m12AhHSN021493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 Bug 428113 depends on bug 431237, which changed state. Bug 431237 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Format - Various subroutines to format text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:53:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021053.m12Ar5l5032215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ivtv- |Review Request: ivtv- |firmware - Firmware for |firmware - Firmware for the |hardware based on Conexant's|PVR 250/350/150/500 model |CX23415/CX23416 codec chip |series Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 05:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ivtv-firmware Updated Description: Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021053.m12ArK4L023117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 05:53 EST ------- *** Bug 250970 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 10:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 05:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021053.m12ArJk3023080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 05:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 346171 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021104.m12B4fsp001693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jamatos at fc.up.pt Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-02-02 06:04 EST ------- Are you sure that the dependency on python 2.5 is correct? Looking into the news it seems that the correct dependency is 2.4. Another question: did you change the spec file after submission? I seem to remember a different spec file when I first looked into it last Monday. In this case it would be nice to increment the release number nevertheless. FWIW I am also guilty of doing that, but while reviewer you get to see the other side. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021121.m12BLHLK004306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 06:21 EST ------- >From the package point of view: This seems fine. I would just remove ETL-config as this will lead to mutliarch conflict (as Ralf state). As synfig do not use it, this shouldn't matter) >From the code point of view: When trying to build synfig I've had: /usr/include/ETL/_surface.h:196: error: 'memcpy' was not declared in this scope So you need to add the missing include (cstring in this case). One note about synfig, there are a lot of missing BR (see the Configuration Summary) - That would be fine to add them when they are available within Fedora. There is also a libavcodec optionnal requirement, and maybe it would be good to provide it as a plugin form third part repository... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:31:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021131.m12BVBPc028987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021141.m12Bfdnt007335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From pabs3 at bonedaddy.net 2008-02-02 06:41 EST ------- ETL-config has been rewritten as a pkg-config wrapper (see patch above). _surface.h error has a one-line fix (#include ) and was fixed in SVN ages ago thanks to Debian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021145.m12Bjgma031072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 06:45 EST ------- Well, I saw the license text and for me the term 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) Neither the PersonalCopy soundfonts nor any of their individual components, in Original or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- is problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021152.m12Bqcq4031916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-02 06:52 EST ------- Upstream is planning on releasing a new version at the end of this month early next month to be compliant with gcc43. As F-9 will contain gcc43 I will wait till the new release and repackage for that. The wrapper is included in upstream already so I will be closer to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021151.m12BpQmb008768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 06:51 EST ------- OK! so about gcc4.3.0 the packager also need to backport the patch. (as we now have pre gcc 4.3.0 in rawhide). About the ETL-config, since this file is generated at a configure step, packager will need to set the same timestamps from a reference file for all arches . This can be done using touch -r any_reference_file $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ETL-config -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 11:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 06:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252049] Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021159.m12Bxp8i032755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asm2 - A code manipulation tool to implement adaptable systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-02 06:59 EST ------- Hi Vivek, An unofficial review of the package: ?? - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - Package named correctly NA - Patches named correctly OK - Spec file named correctly to match base NO * License is valid ?? - Licence field matches package OK - Licence file installed if supplied OK - Spec file in American English ?? - Source matches upstream (md5) NA - Locales use %find_lang OK - %clean is present and correct OK - Package has correct buildroot. OK - Specfile Legible OK - Builds in Mock NA - %post/%postun calls ldconfig for sh libs OK - Owns directories it creates OK - No duplicate files OK - Has %defattr and has correct permissions OK - Macros used consistently OK - %doc does not affect runtime NA - Headers/static libs in -devel NA - .pc files in -devel NA - .so files in -devel NA - -devel requires base OK - Contains no .la libtool archive files OK - Does not own others files NA - .desktop files installed correctly OK - BuildRequires correct. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package has rm -rf %{buildroot} at top of %install. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT used instead OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. ?? - rpmlint output. OK - documentation in -doc package OK - final provides and requires are sane. OK - should have dist tag ?? - should package latest version - RPMLint against asm2-2.1-2jpp.2.fc8.src.rpm says: asm2.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 31) asm2.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java asm2.src: W: invalid-license BSD-style - Source0 should be http://download.us.forge.objectweb.org/asm/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Moreover, I couldn't download the source from the specified location on Feb 02, 2008. Connection timed out. So I couldn't verify if the package is of latest version or not. - License 'BSD-style' is non standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 12:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021205.m12C5KiD011115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-02-02 07:05 EST ------- Hello, Here's a detailed review of another package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 12:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021226.m12CQxYv013797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-02 07:26 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach-0.68.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 12:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021235.m12CZGbj005603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 07:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293788) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293788&action=view) A example spec file using %define afterwards Well, I have not checked -3 yet, however: (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #20) > > B. For spec file: > > B-2: %prep > > * Source file override > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > cp source/dist/util/arch %SOURCE8 > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > - Source file must not be overwritten. > > If you want to "define" sgearch, you can do like > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > %install > > sgearch=`sh source/dist/util/arch` > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > The problem is I need %{sgearch} in the %files section as well. Suggestions? You can use %define afterwards. A example is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 12:53:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 07:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240543] Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021253.m12CrZOT007879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dsmidiwifi - remote controll midi with your Nintendo DS Alias: dsmidiwifi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240543 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-02-02 07:53 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=390659 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:22:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021322.m12DMtiv021574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021334.m12DYu1H022820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-02 08:34 EST ------- koji build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=390860 You have missing BR: ImageMagick and also Requires: python-xlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021340.m12DexTb014545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-02 08:40 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys-0.9.8.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021341.m12DfDp9023951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 08:41 EST ------- So i'm building color-filesystem including some rpm marcros in /etc/rpm/macros.color : %%_colordir %%_datadir/color %%_syscolordir %%_colordir %%_icccolordir %%_colordir/icc %%_cmmscolordir %%_colordir/cmms Does that sound good ? We haven't left FE-legal here: - postcardware problem ? - license for bundled icc profile in xcalib (and also oyaranos) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:58:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021358.m12DwZQV016668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-02 08:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293793) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293793&action=view) some spec fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 13:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 08:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021359.m12Dxu7v016739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-02 08:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293794) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293794&action=view) Fix install locations in Makefile This will fix install locations as well as preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 14:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021403.m12E39Ot017838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 09:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > So i'm building color-filesystem including some rpm marcros in > /etc/rpm/macros.color : > > %%_colordir %%_datadir/color > %%_syscolordir %%_colordir > %%_icccolordir %%_colordir/icc > %%_cmmscolordir %%_colordir/cmms > > Does that sound good ? Seems good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 14:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 09:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021456.m12EuhHW025004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 09:56 EST ------- Unfortunately due to an "issue" with rpmbuild, you will find that your package included .pyc and .pyo files in /usr/bin which really should not be there. Your options are to %exclude them in %files with something like %exclude %{_bindir}/*.py[co] or to rename the executables you place in /usr/bin to names that don't end in .py. The latter may be more reasonable since you don't generally expect installed executables to end in an extension like .py. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021506.m12F6p2G026793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:05:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021505.m12F5jlb026664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 10:05 EST ------- You should provide your wikiname so that folks will know what to add to the EditGroup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021506.m12F6Z2H026738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle for some time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] New: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/color-filesystem.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/color-filesystem-1-1.src.rpm Description: Color filesystem layout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021515.m12FF28Y004682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:18:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021518.m12FIPek005060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|285351 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:15:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021515.m12FF1mG004343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |285351 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 10:15 EST ------- I don't know what BR gawk in kde-filesystem but I've kept it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021518.m12FINfc005035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|431310 | ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 10:18 EST ------- SPECS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/xcalib.spec SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xcalib-0.8-2.kwizart.fc8.src.rpm Description: Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org I've send a email to the author about bundled icc profile license and the postcardware add to the GPL license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021524.m12FOK1H005871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 10:24 EST ------- This fails to build for me: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -o repdoc repdoc.o -lgdbm /bin/sh: ../libtool: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [repdoc] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/librep-0.17/src' make: *** [src/repdoc] Error 2 Adding BuildRequires: libtool gets things to progress further, until: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/librep-0.17-2.svn20071102.fc9-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir You need to explicitly delete this file, which is generated as part of the texinfo compilation but should never be part of any package. At the end of %install: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_infodir}/dir Things build after that. rpmlint then says: librep.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.17-2 0.17-2.svn20071102.fc9 Your changelog entries should match the version. librep-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This is OK, but you should consider whether any of the documentation you package is more appropriate for the -devel package. I notice a bunch of .la files packaged. Generally these should not be packaged; do you have some specific reason for doing so? Are the .jl and .jlc files arch-neutral? Otherwise they will conflict when both i386 and x86_64 packages are installed together. There'a a bunch of stuff installed into /usr/libexec/rep that seems better suited to %{_libdir}/rep instead. Generally I'd expect to see only executables in /usr/libexec. (See what gcc does, for example.) I do not know if this opinion is widely held, however. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:33:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:33:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021533.m12FXoTL030371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-02 10:33 EST ------- Unblocking FE-Legal, I've already send the license to Spot and it has been ok-ed. Also notice that the same text is in the SIL font license and we also ship fonts under this license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021541.m12Ff6I0008491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 10:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Unblocking FE-Legal, I've already send the license to Spot and it has been > ok-ed. Also notice that the same text is in the SIL font license and we also > ship fonts under this license. > Then would you add the mail to rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 15:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021549.m12FnnJK009464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-02 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Unblocking FE-Legal, I've already send the license to Spot and it has been > > ok-ed. Also notice that the same text is in the SIL font license and we also > > ship fonts under this license. > > > > Then would you add the mail to rpm? You mean Spot's mail, why? We normally never put license approval mails in rpm's, I don't see how this is any different. As said the same clause in the SIL font license see: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=OFL_web Its clause 1, then see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-39539a5e2fb8ee8b89a4753ef071f606dd55161f And notice how the SIL open font license is not only an approved but even is the recommended font license for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021600.m12G0Uaj002010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-02 11:00 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys-0.9.8.3-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:04:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021604.m12G4CIX012000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021633.m12GXj0T016100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 11:33 EST ------- wikiname is IanWeller. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:45:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021645.m12Gj9dR017845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xautolock - |Review Request: xautolock - |Launches a program when your|Launches a program when your |X session has been idle for |X session has been idle |some time | ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 11:45 EST ------- * Sat Feb 02 2007 Ian Weller 2.2-2 - Shortened summary - Fixed make flags - Fixed installation of man page Spec: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-2/xautolock.spec SRPM: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-2/xautolock-2.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021647.m12Glkb3018114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 11:47 EST ------- Well, okay. I will recheck this later. A question: Do you have any idea to deal with %_sysconfdir/timidity.cfg? What I am thinking now is - Each rpms providing timidity++ has its own patch config file under %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/, with the name having some prefix indicating priority, for example %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/00-soundfont.cfg - And when a rpm providing timidity patches is installed, it calls a script in timidity++-base (for example) to update %_sysconfdir/timidity.cfg (marked as %verify(not size md5 mtime) ) - Sysadmin can "edit" timidity.cfg by adding his/her own configuration file under %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/ and calling registration script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 16:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021649.m12Gn2SW008578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 11:49 EST ------- As you like, but this patch is often trivial, and that would be a good thing to have backported and tested so we could start review synfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 17:28:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021728.m12HSK9m014537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 12:28 EST ------- Builds OK and rpmlint is silent. The naming is a bit tough; this isn't a CPAN module and the tarball name (phonet.tgz) doesn't match the module name, but it does unpack into a directory which matches the module name. Odd. CPAN has no hits for either "phonet" or "ccom". I'd tend to agree with you that perl-ccom is a better name than perl-phonet; this wouldn't be the first time upstream has chosen a tarball name that has nothing to do with the actual software. There's a language oddity in the description; I assume it comes from a mistranslation. The words "tail" and "tale" do not have the same spelling, but they have the same pronunciation. I think everything is correct if you just s/spelling/pronunciation/. * source files match upstream: 05f04c7f0d4a4294d3af3df8ee07fdfe397ae1b30ac36d01ec1a381399e0830b phonet.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines as far as I can tell. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. ? description needs a * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ccom.so()(64bit) perl(ccom) = 1.4 perl-ccom = 1.4.1-1.fc9 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(AutoLoader) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and passes (not much of a test suite, but it runs): 1..1 ok 1 * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED, just fix up the description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 17:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021755.m12HtgrA027801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 12:55 EST ------- Well, for 6.1u3-3: * uid - On my system the number "43" is already used by xfs (xorg-x11-xfs). - BTW do you have any reason to prefer fedora-usermgmt? * Requires(post) etc - Please update Requires(post) etc on gridengine main package. * Overwriting source - As I said above, this can be avoided. * mandir - Usually section 3 man files explain functions or so and they should be in -devel package. * License - I will propose the tag later after checking linkage again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:01:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430931] Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021801.m12I1xp9019486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430931 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 13:01 EST ------- Minimal, perhaps, but unfortunately it doesn't build for me in rawhide: checking for kde-config... not found configure: error: The important program kde-config was not found! Please check whether you installed KDE correctly. I believe that you need a build dependency on kdelibs3, but you should also make sure this works properly with kde4. And even after fixing the build dependency, I find that this package wants to regenerate the autoconf stuff and fails because aclocal and automake are not installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021807.m12I7X0b029867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(iphands at yahoo.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 13:07 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431026] Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021805.m12I5efP029640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtvg - A simple TV program schedule viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431026 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 13:05 EST ------- This fails to build because the desktop file is malformed: + desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora --delete-original --dir=/var/tmp/gtvg-0.3-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications /var/tmp/gtvg-0.3-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/gtvg.desktop /var/tmp/gtvg-0.3-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-gtvg.desktop: error: value "0.1" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version Error on file "/var/tmp/gtvg-0.3-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/gtvg.desktop": Failed to validate the created desktop file "Version" doesn't mean the version of the program, it's the version of the desktop file standard the file conforms to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021814.m12IEv5j030705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:14:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021814.m12IEun1030685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |239936, 285351 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021814.m12IEwAS030721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021823.m12INOIZ032129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(radford at blackbean. | |org) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-02 13:23 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:38:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021838.m12IcEZo001696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-02 13:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 18:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021847.m12IlXj6003105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-02 13:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 19:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021928.m12JSe38031824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-02 14:28 EST ------- It fails to build in devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=391037 F-7 and F-8 build successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=391014 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=390968 It is strange since the failure seems to be related to code in regex.h which comes from glibc-header, and it builds fine on my local machine (rpmbuild -ba gnome-build.spec) with the latest gcc-4.3 and glibc packages from Rawhide. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 19:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:54:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] New: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guidolinfrancesco at email.it QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://web.tiscali.it/guidonet/pam_usb/pam_usb.spec SRPM URL: http://web.tiscali.it/guidonet/pam_usb/pam_usb-0.4.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: pam_usb provides hardware authentication for Linux using ordinary USB Flash Drives. It works with any application supporting PAM, such as su, GDM, KDM, etc. The pam_usb package contains a PAM module and several tools: pamusb-agent: trigger actions, such as locking the screen, upon device authentication and removal. pamusb-conf: configuration helper. pamusb-check: integrate pam_usb?s authentication engine within your scripts or applications. pam_usb-0.4.2 was completely rewritten from scratch, now it include support for HAL and DBus and a new authentication model called One Time Pads, in addition to USB serial number, model and vendor verifications. Basically, a pad is just a bunch of random bytes stored on both the USB device and the computer. Every time you authenticate, those pads are compared. If they match, access is granted and the pads are regenerated, otherwise access is denied. More info here: http://www.pamusb.org/ http://scox.info/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 19:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021955.m12Jt6Ka003166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-02 14:55 EST ------- This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 19:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802021955.m12Jtwv4013220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-02 14:55 EST ------- I patched the original Makefile because it install the documentation under $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/doc/pamusb instead of $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/doc/pam_usb-0.4.2. Also I remove the flag -Wall because it's just present in $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Then I patched src/pad.c because with CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" it give some warning: src/pad.c: In function 'pusb_pad_open_system': src/pad.c:97: warning: ignoring return value of 'chown', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/pad.c: In function 'pusb_pad_update': src/pad.c:213: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/pad.c:215: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/pad.c: In function 'pusb_pad_compare': src/pad.c:240: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result src/pad.c:242: warning: ignoring return value of 'fread', declared with attribute warn_unused_result So I make some checks to the return value of chown, fwrite and fread, and if they fails I log and error with log_error(). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022002.m12K2CEr014323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 guidolinfrancesco at email.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022007.m12K7e89015315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-02 15:07 EST ------- flam3-2.7.8-4.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:10:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022010.m12KA8Pv015839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-02 15:10 EST ------- flam3-2.7.8-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022013.m12KDVkM005817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 15:13 EST ------- koji build OK added to bodhi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022013.m12KDVJT005838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 Bug 431290 depends on bug 417711, which changed state. Bug 417711 Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] New: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jakub.rusinek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv.spec SRPM URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv-2.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor current and upcoming TV programs. Features include: * program descriptions as tooltips; * temaining time of/until current and upcoming programs; * program search dialog with incremental search; * global keybindings for most common actions; * program reminders and more... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 20:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022054.m12KsCs4021622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 15:54 EST ------- koji build ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=391426 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 21:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430366] Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022100.m12L09Pv022698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430366 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-02 16:00 EST ------- (This is an informal review) Version: 0.9beta9 Non numeric version string like alpha, beta, rc, cannot be simply putted into the version tag, you should use the Release field for this. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a I think you should disable all the optional package that doesn't fill the Fedora guidelines, like ffmpeg, using the appropriate ./configure flags: --with-oss=yes,no compile with OSS support (default: yes) --with-alsa=yes,no compile with ALSA support (default: yes) --with-jack=yes,no compile with JACK support (default: yes) --with-src=yes,no compile with Sample Rate Converter support (default: yes) --with-sndfile=yes,no compile with sndfile (WAV, AIFF, etc.) support (default: yes) --with-flac=yes,no compile with FLAC support (default: yes) --with-ogg=yes,no compile with Ogg Vorbis support (default: yes) --with-vorbisenc=yes,no compile with Ogg Vorbis encoding support (default: yes) --with-speex=yes,no compile with Ogg Speex support (default: yes) --with-mpeg=yes,no compile with MPEG Audio support (default: yes) --with-mod=yes,no compile with MOD Audio support (default: yes) --with-mpc=yes,no compile with Musepack support (default: yes) --with-mac=yes,no compile with Monkey's Audio Codec support (default: yes) --with-lavc=yes,no compile with lavc (FFmpeg) support (default: yes) --with-lame=yes,no compile with LAME (MP3 encoding) support (default: yes) --with-wavpack=yes,no compile with WavPack support (default: yes) --with-ladspa=yes,no compile with LADSPA plugin support (default: yes) --with-cdda=yes,no compile with CDDA support (default: yes) --with-cddb=yes,no compile with CDDB support (default: yes) --with-ifp=yes,no compile with iRiver iFP driver support (default: yes) --with-systray=yes,no compile with Systray support (default: yes) --with-loop=yes,no compile with loop playback support (default: yes) --with-podcast=yes,no compile with podcast support (default: yes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 21:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022117.m12LHvk0015009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-02 16:17 EST ------- *** Bug 346171 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 21:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346171] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022117.m12LHuJU014968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-02 16:17 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 250970 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 21:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346161] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022117.m12LHwnm015048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-ivtv - Xorg X11 ivtv video driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346161 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide Bug 346161 depends on bug 346171, which changed state. Bug 346171 Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346171 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 21:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022152.m12LqlB4019918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-02 16:52 EST ------- The OS X-only script should probably be '%exclude'd from the final file listing ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022206.m12M62BX022373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:05:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022205.m12M5QF7032322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-02 17:05 EST ------- Defining _GNU_SOURCE fixed it: %build %if 0%{?fc9} export CPPFLAGS="-D_GNU_SOURCE" %endif %configure --disable-static -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022208.m12M82ak032604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 iphands at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(iphands at yahoo.com)| ------- Additional Comments From iphands at yahoo.com 2008-02-02 17:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > ! Note > For general packaging guidelines you can refer to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > I just did a quick glance at your spec file and just tried to rebuild > your srpm. > > * Rebuild failed. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=362863 > It seems that at least texinfo is missing from BuildRequires. Added texinfo > * Fix SourceURL (see "Sourceforge.net" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL ) Changed dl.sf.net to downloads.sourceforge.net > * Don't use Epoch unless needed. Removed Epoch: 1 > * BuildRoot does not match Fedora guidelines. The package has its own root dir in the zipfile... (I don't know the procedure with this) > * Please make it sure that fedora specific compilation flags are > honored correctly ("Compiler flags" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > * Compilation flag "-O3" is not allowed for Fedora because this > makes debugging difficult. > * Also "-fomit-frame-pointer" is forbidden > * And please consider to remove "-ffast-math" as this relaxes > calculation precision and may cause debugging difficult. "make %{?_smp_mflags}" changed to "make %{optflags} %{?_smp_mflags}" Does this cover the -O3 flag? Was that being used as the default? (I am not sure how -O3 was making it in there). Removal of -ffast-math? should the %{optflags} take care of this also? Just looked at the configure script... Should I just remove the CFLAGS= line then gcc would default to whatever the environment is set to (wich should be %{optflags})? If so I can patch the configure file. > * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) changed to %defattr(-,root,root,-) > * Please write the %files entry more verbosely so that we can grasp > what files are installed easily. This one I am at a loss with.... it is just one .a and a bunch of .h files. rpm -ql on the installed packages shows them all. (help please) Sorry for the delay (busy at home and work) and the lack of knowledge on my part. Thanks for the help, -Ian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022212.m12MCDxB023173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-02 17:12 EST ------- Dan, will you be proceeding with the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022214.m12MEdrG000966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-02 17:14 EST ------- The compat bits don't harm and they do cater now for their removal by rpm itself once the package is commissioned to be deinstalled. The licenses have been placed next to firmware location, although I removed that specific wording when writing the licenses. But let's not split hairs. Spec URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ivtv-firmware-20070217-16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 22:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 17:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022259.m12MxX4Q029234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-02 17:59 EST ------- Actually you make a fair point since there are still 2 other packages linked to this one. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/ETL-devel/ETL-devel-0.04.10-3.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/ETL-devel/ETL-devel.spec Updated with the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 23:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022316.m12NGjgG032232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-02 18:16 EST ------- Source archive timestamp ois not kept: $ ls -l ./xautolock-2.2.tgz ../SOURCES/xautolock-2.2.tgz -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 35288 jan 27 23:18 ../SOURCES/xautolock-2.2.tgz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 35288 d?c 31 23:36 ./xautolock-2.2.tgz You can use wget -N or spectool -g on the spec file. Also the install is now done twice, once in make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" and a second time in make install install.man DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" (when make is given 2 targets, it does both). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 23:24:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:24:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022324.m12NODGM000629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 18:24 EST ------- Did you know this package is already in the repository? It has been orphaned and is not in F8, although it is in F7. Your package seems to differ significantly from what is currently in the repository, and I would urge you to investigate the difference and make sure that if your package is imported it does not cause issues for users who are upgrading. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 23:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022325.m12NPvjE011354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 18:25 EST ------- This failed to build in mock (x86_64, rawhide): gcc -o .libs/desktop-data-engine desktop_data_engine-hippo-application-monitor.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-cookies-linux.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-distribution.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-cookies.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-helper.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-im-client.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-local.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-model.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-model-client.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-pidgin.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-server.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-settings.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-system.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-dbus-web.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-im.o desktop_data_engine-hippo-platform-impl.o desktop_data_engine-main.o desktop_data_engine-json.o -pthread ./.libs/libhippo.a -L/lib64 ./.libs/libengine.a -lpcre -lsqlite3 /builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-data-model-1.2.0/.libs/libddm-1.so -lloudmouth-1 -lidn -ldbus-glib-1 -ldbus-1 -lgnome-desktop-2 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lstartup-notification-1 -lbonoboui-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lbonobo-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgconf-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lresolv desktop_data_engine-hippo-application-monitor.o: In function `poll_for_idleness': hippo-application-monitor.c:(.text+0x727): undefined reference to `XScreenSaverQueryInfo' desktop_data_engine-hippo-application-monitor.o: In function `hippo_application_monitor_add': hippo-application-monitor.c:(.text+0x84f): undefined reference to `XScreenSaverQueryExtension' hippo-application-monitor.c:(.text+0x8b4): undefined reference to `XScreenSaverAllocInfo' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [desktop-data-engine] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/desktop-data-model-1.2.0' make: *** [all] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 23:40:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802022340.m12NePiQ003227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnome- |Review Request: gnome- |applet-ontv - OnTV is a |applet-ontv - OnTV is a |GNOME applet to monitor TV |GNOME applet to monitor TV |programs |programs ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 18:40 EST ------- This fails to build for me: checking for XML::Parser... configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.98867 (%build) To double-check, a koji scratch build failed as well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=391886 Please test your packages to make sure that they build properly before submitting, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 2 23:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 18:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431335] New: Review Request: decibel - Music player for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431335 Summary: Review Request: decibel - Music player for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/decibel-audio-player.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/decibel-audio-player-0.09-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Decibel is an audio player that aims at being very straightforward to use by means of a very clean and user friendly interface. It is especially targeted at GNOME and will follow, as closely as possible, the GNOME HIG. It makes use of the GStreamer library to read audio files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 00:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030001.m1301CXo016157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-02 19:01 EST ------- Strange... Should I add perl(XML::Parser) to the BR? It always worked... PS: They're building in my build environment very well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 00:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431335] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030014.m130EcTn007858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431335 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: decibel - |Review Request: decibel- |Music player for GNOME |audio-player - Music player | |for GNOME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 00:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030018.m130IQ4f018623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 19:18 EST ------- So these builds are succeeding for you in mock? I'm not really sure how that could happen, but you can always do your own koji scratch builds to see how the buildsys will deal with it. If it won't build in koji, it won't ever make it into the distro so you might as well try. koji build --scratch dist-f9 gnome-applet-ontv-2.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm That's what gave me that koji URL above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 01:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030102.m1312Hhw024692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 20:02 EST ------- The build dependency on gawk isn't needed at all; you might as well get rid of it. It's needed in the kde-filesystem package because that specfile actually calls awk. Packaging-wise, I see nothing wrong with this package. It only contains three directories (two empty) and one set of RPM macros, and macro usage, specfile naming, package naming, permissions, dependencies and directory ownership are all OK. On that I'm inclined to approve this. However, I wonder at the need to make a separate filesystem package for three directories, and the annoyance at needing something to provide color-filesystem forever once this gets in even if it turns out it's not a good idea. Has anyone talked to the maintainer of the filesystem package to see if these three directories could be added? The same goes for the rpm folks and the macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 01:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030130.m131URpP028751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-02 20:30 EST ------- I've tried to raise the problem on fedora-devel-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-September/msg01875.html But I didn't get much answear. I thought the problem to include theses macros and directories to the filesystem package means directories to be part of the "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard", which they aren't until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 01:41:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:41:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030141.m131feSK030291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-02 20:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293814) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293814&action=view) modified librep spec file Some further remarks about this package: .svn .cvsignore are superflous in a tar file. Every file and directory in a tar file has the same timestamp (possibly an svn deficiency). /sbin/install-info is 'Prereq:' to install documentation gmp should be in 'Requires:' In %files section it should be just %{_datadir}/rep %{_libexecdir}/rep %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp/* or you will get "leftovers" after deinstalling the package %{_datadir}/emacs/site-lisp/* %{_infodir}/*.info* possibly in 'devel' Options for %configure are taken from old librep specs. I cannot tell how necessary they are now but they definitely work. Missing '--with-readline' is not good. Modified spec file is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 02:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030233.m132Xb6C027542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-02 21:33 EST ------- Please note that use of Prereq: is not allowed and is a blocker. Requires(pre): is probably what is intended, although it seems that other dependencies are a bit off in the specfile from comment #2 (Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig, /sbin/install-info is missing, for example.) For things like this you should just consult http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets and use the scriptlets and dependencies provided there. Also, I noticed that the name of the package violates the naming guidelines. "svnYYYYMMDD" is incorrect; the date goes first, followed by whatever you like (probably "svn" in this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 03:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 22:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030316.m133Gqp0012364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 ------- Additional Comments From pravi.a at ippimail.com 2008-02-02 22:16 EST ------- Rahul, Thanks for explaining the difference. I was trying to compare the two processes and it makes sense now. In debian world it would be similar to getting official DD (Debian Developer) status which could even last years to complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 04:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030405.m1345fmb008783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 23:05 EST ------- whoops. i shoulda seen that... * Sat Feb 02 2007 Ian Weller 2.2-3 - Fixed timestamp of Source0 - Removed redundant installation spec: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-3/xautolock.spec srpm: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-3/xautolock-2.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 04:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:09:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030409.m1349ATd008997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 04:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030410.m134A1D1020024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-02 23:10 EST ------- the package builds fine on i386. i'm currently working on the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 04:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030424.m134OinR022084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ianweller at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 06:31:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030631.m136VS2h029445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 01:31 EST ------- [OK] = ok, [XX] = fail, [NA] = doesn't apply, [ ] = not tested [OK] rpmlint passes [OK] package named according to Package Naming Guidelines [XX] spec file name matches base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - vodovod.spec.0.10 was odd, not sure if that was just for your hosting or what [OK] package must meet Packaging Guidelines [OK] package must be licensed with Fedora approved license and meet Licensing Guidelines [OK] License field in spec file must match actual license [OK] if (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc [OK] spec file is written in American English [OK] spec file for the package is legible [OK] sources used to build package match upstream source, as provided in spec URL [OK] package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture [NA] if package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch [OK] all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires except for exceptions [NA] The spec file MUST handle locales properly [NA] Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths must call ldconfig in %post and %postun [NA] if the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [OK] package must own all directories that it creates [OK] package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing [OK] permissions on files must be set properly [OK] package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [OK] each package must consistently use macros [OK] package must contain code [NA] large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage - i thought at first that html/ should be *-doc, but it's only one file... [OK] if a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application [NA] header files must be in a -devel package [NA] static libraries must be in a -static package [NA] packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability) [NA] library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package [NA] devel packages must require base package using fully versioned dependency [OK] packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [OK] packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file [OK] packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [OK] each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [OK] all filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 [NA] if the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it [NA] description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [OK] package builds in mock [OK] package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=392130 [OK] reviewer should test that the package functions as described [NA] if scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane [NA] usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [NA] the placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg [NA] if the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself One problem found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 06:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030635.m136Z6pj009035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 01:35 EST ------- I actually looked in the SRPM and the spec file was the correct name, so there are no visible problems with this package. ================================== approved ================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 06:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030641.m136fRMY010053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-03 01:41 EST ------- Ian, sorry. However this package contains a (maybe some) issue(s) which must be fixed before approving this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 06:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030650.m136oNTD011413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 01:50 EST ------- would you be willing to explain what exactly those issues are? i don't see 'em. did you see comment #3? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 06:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030652.m136qYMt011694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 01:52 EST ------- oh I remember what I was thinking -- line 4, summary: probably shouldn't contain the package name. also, should the comment in the .desktop file have a period at the end? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 07:10:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 02:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030710.m137ACDc003037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-03 02:10 EST ------- Thanks About the autotools issue, I've just sent an email to upstream developer and waiting for his reply. in the meantime: - changed the license tag to LGPLv2+ - moved the so files to %{_libdir}. - considering the current autoconf version works with this tarball, I've ran it and generated a patch to include a working configure script until upstream provided their own generated configure script. http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/libitl.spec http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/libitl-0.6.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 08:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 03:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802030815.m138Fknv023944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-03 03:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293826) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293826&action=view) Patch to compile against g++43 (In reply to comment #2) > [OK] package must meet Packaging Guidelines Well, I know many reviewers uses check-list style like you. I don't object to it, however I always wonder what this "package must meet Packaging Guidelines" means on this check list. Actually http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines contains 40 items... Anyway: * This package does not build on dist-f9. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=392156 A proposed patch is attached. * On build fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored ("Compiler flags" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) Using -------------------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} \ CC="%{__cxx} %{optflags}" -------------------------------------------------------------------- is good for this package. - Desktop icon must be updated ("GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) - And actually the description of this package "Vodovod -" is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 10:34:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 05:34:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031034.m13AYUTV011663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 05:34 EST ------- I get a 404 not found.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 10:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 05:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031038.m13Ac3DE032615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 05:38 EST ------- I guess that there are many directories in the filesystem package that are not in the FHS and, even if not, it is not an issue to add a set of common directories in -- if they really fit in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 10:43:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 05:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031043.m13AhfJN013296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-03 05:43 EST ------- I'm not using mock. Maybe it's wrong but I never used it. About building, I had no vte-devel and package was built successfully... Log of scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=391994&name=build.log PS: There's an issue with Fedora People - http:404 for all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 11:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031106.m13B6e37005071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From joost at cnoc.nl 2008-02-03 06:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #40) > The OS X-only script should probably be '%exclude'd from the final file listing ? I'm a little bit reluctant to do so. Lazarus is an IDE for multiple platforms, an has several tools for each platform to run on properly. I woudn't be surprised if there are more files than this one which are in fact for another operating system. Maybe for example also some readme's and such. Should I now search the complete tree for all those files and exclude them? And do that for every release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 11:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031108.m13B8iqB017424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-03 06:08 EST ------- Yay, success: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=392428. Now we must wait for Fedora People... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 11:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 06:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031111.m13BBZCI018114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-03 06:11 EST ------- First where is your new spec/srpm? (please change the release number every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion) (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * Please make it sure that fedora specific compilation flags are > > honored correctly ("Compiler flags" of > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > > * Compilation flag "-O3" is not allowed for Fedora because this > > makes debugging difficult. > > * Also "-fomit-frame-pointer" is forbidden > > * And please consider to remove "-ffast-math" as this relaxes > > calculation precision and may cause debugging difficult. > "make %{?_smp_mflags}" changed to "make %{optflags} %{?_smp_mflags}" I guess "make %optflags %{?_smp_mflags}" won't work. > Does this cover the -O3 flag? Was that being used as the default? (I am not sure > how -O3 was making it in there). No. Fedora specific compilation flags can be checked by "rpm --eval %optflags". On rawhide i386 system, this returns: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Removal of -ffast-math? should the %{optflags} take care of this also? > Just looked at the configure script... Should I just remove the CFLAGS= line > then gcc would default to whatever the environment is set to (wich should be > %{optflags})? If so I can patch the configure file. It seems that some patch is needed against configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 12:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031203.m13C3Igi013620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-03 07:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://web.tiscali.it/guidonet/pam_usb/pam_usb.spec SRPM URL: http://web.tiscali.it/guidonet/pam_usb/pam_usb-0.4.2-1.fc8.src.rpm I didn't know that it was already in the repository. Basically there's no big differences between the old pam_usb-0.4.0-1.fc7.src.rpm and my package, however now I merged my changes into the old package in the repository and I updated it. The binaries and the libraries are replaced, and the configuration file /etc/pamusb.conf is backward compatible with pam_usb-0.4.0, so there shouldn't be problem during the upgrade. In any case I'll make some tests with Fedora7 in the next few day, then I'll let you know if the upgrade works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 13:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031319.m13DJvou025598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-03 08:19 EST ------- Continuing review : * There is still a mess mix of spaces and tabs in the spec file (minor) * Passing --with-ogg-libraries=%{_libdir} is not needed * The "chmod a-x README" makes more sense in %prep than in %install * Why "--enable-static" as the static libs are excluded in %files? * Why are libspeexdsp.so and libspeexdsp.a in the main package? (major!) * The "rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/speex-*/manual.pdf" line is wrong, should be "rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_docdir}/speex/manual.pdf" * The "%{_defaultdocdir}/speex/manual.pdf" line in %files should be removed to avoid including the PDF manual twice (after fixing the above rm). And what about my suggestion of splitting out the two binaries into their own sub-package, like many other codec library packages do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 13:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031323.m13DNSTH006178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: sshmenu - |Review Request: sshmenu - |GNOME panel applet to |Application to organize SSH |organize SSH connection |connection information in a |information in a menu |menu Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-03 08:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sshmenu Short Description: Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu Owners: thias Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 13:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 08:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031338.m13DcokT028585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-03 08:38 EST ------- No response at all :(( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 14:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] New: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng-1.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This program makes PNG and/or GIF graphics from DVI files as obtained from TeX and its relatives. It is intended to produce anti-aliased screen-resolution images as fast as is possible. The target audience is people who need to generate and regenerate many images again and again. Commentary: Patrice Dumas recently made a call for packages to split out components of texlive for which texlive is not upstream. This is one such package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 14:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031428.m13ESboY004594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-03 09:28 EST ------- The "fix" was much easier than I thought. The package only needs a single header file from the OpenVPN sources : openvpn-plugin.h. Since the plugin doesn't link against OpenVPN, I've included that header file as a source of the rpm. It's not the cleanest solution, but I'm not sure it's worth creating an "openvpn-devel" package just for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 14:34:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031434.m13EY1XV017688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-03 09:34 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng-1.9-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Feb 3 2007 Jonathan G. Underwood - 1.9-2 - Install dvigif info file - Add Provides for dvigif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 14:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031434.m13EYolX017771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-03 09:34 EST ------- Spec: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv.spec SRPM: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv-2.8.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 15:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031535.m13FZeBM027704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-02-03 10:35 EST ------- Updates posted based on feedback from Jason and Michal http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17-3.20071102svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031703.m13H3d4X029705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: pygtk2 |Merge Review: pygtk2 | |(stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031704.m13H4Qkt029762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: devhelp (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: devhelp |Merge Review: devhelp | |(stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031704.m13H4Yqb029792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-03 12:04 EST ------- Jason, I'll have a look to that before importing it to CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ccom Short Description: Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement Owners: robert Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:09:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031709.m13H9U1d010720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pycairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:09:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031709.m13H9KYm010688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031706.m13H6Uob010444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gtkhtml3 |Merge Review: gtkhtml3 | |(stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225834] Merge Review: gnome-python2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031706.m13H6Hc0010413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225834 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-python2 |Merge Review: gnome-python2 | |(stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225833] Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031706.m13H67b8010386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-extras (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225833 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-python2-|Merge Review: gnome-python2- |extras |extras (stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225832] Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031705.m13H5vQL010262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-python2-desktop (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225832 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|f7 |7 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Merge Review: gnome-python2-|Merge Review: gnome-python2- |desktop |desktop (stalled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 17:35:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:35:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] New: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/inconsoleata-fonts/inconsolata-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/inconsoleata-fonts/inconsolata-fonts-1.009-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 18:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031829.m13ITVv2023611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-03 13:29 EST ------- Is this correct: Group: Applications/Internet I would changed %files lines to: %doc Changelog License Readme Todo %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1* but that's me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 18:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] New: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: GYachI is a Linux client for Yahoo! Messenger protocol, written using GTK+ GUI toolkit. This package includes both the external voice chat program, GYVoice, and the external webcam program, GyachI-Webcam. In addition, this package includes GyachI-Broadcaster for sending webcam streams. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 18:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187243] Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031834.m13IYXDR024397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lazarus : IDE and RAD tool for the free pascal compiler (fpc) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187243 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-03 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #41) > (In reply to comment #40) > > The OS X-only script should probably be '%exclude'd from the final file listing ? > > I'm a little bit reluctant to do so. Lazarus is an IDE for multiple platforms, > an has several tools for each platform to run on properly. I woudn't be > surprised if there are more files than this one which are in fact for another > operating system. Maybe for example also some readme's and such. > > Should I now search the complete tree for all those files and exclude them? And > do that for every release? Good point. If there are multiple files like that, then if only for consistency, it's better to just include them all. The users could be trusted to figure out which script applies to their environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 18:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031838.m13Ic5gA012606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library Alias: mini https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 ------- Additional Comments From rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu 2008-02-03 13:38 EST ------- Yes. I'll try and post another spec in the next week or two. I don't think that we'll need to modify the source since the DXT code isn't in libmini. The patented code is in libsquish which libmini links against (which is now optional). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 18:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031859.m13IxdGc028260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 13:59 EST ------- > Well, I know many reviewers uses check-list style > like you. I don't object to it, however I always wonder > what this "package must meet Packaging Guidelines" means > on this check list. Actually > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > contains 40 items... I shall keep that in mind. ;) Other than that I'll wait for an updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031905.m13J5bTU029904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 14:05 EST ------- Please rebuild texinfo as soon as possible, currently the texinfo tex files are in the void. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031915.m13JFJMr019073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 14:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I get a 404 not found.... fedorapeople.org was down for some reason today, i read it on the mailing list. should work now. (In reply to comment #15) > Is this correct: > Group: Applications/Internet no. fixing. * Sun Feb 03 2008 Ian Weller 2.2-4 - Fixed dates in changelog (2007 -> 2008) - Fixed grouping - Tightened up files list spec: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-4/xautolock.spec srpm: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xautolock/2.2-4/xautolock-2.2-4.fc8.src.rpm koji builds: all passed dist-fc7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=393437 dist-f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=393430 dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=393442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031924.m13JOOsN032726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 14:24 EST ------- i tried looking up the license and it only shows up on one page in google at http://www.thepromisedlan.org/flatnuke/sections/Download/Freedom/LICENSE-libraries-linux.txt under "xmlrpc-epi license". i'm not sure if this is can be packaged in fedora based on the license, and if it can, what do we call it? (the license also shows up at http://xmlrpc-epi.sourceforge.net/main.php?t=license ) i'm assuming the reason it was considered "BSD" before was because that is what it is considered on the sf.net project home page. i'm not sure where to make an upstream inquiry, their devel list on sf.net has turned into a spam list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031924.m13JO4dv020182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-03 14:24 EST ------- I recently became aware of a fix for the unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints; you can put this after the %configure call: # hack to omit unused-direct-shlib-dependencies sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool and the problematic dependencies go away. It's not a huge issue but it's easy to fix, so do what you think is best. With that fix, the only other rpmlint complaint is: ggz-gtk-client-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is not a problem. * source files match upstream: 790f7db17e252e02c07f68cbdda3de071945e284582edd1c5b21891e568c6cff ggz-gtk-client-0.0.14.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ggz-gtk-client-0.0.14-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm libggz-gtk.so.1()(64bit) ggz-gtk-client = 0.0.14-2.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libggz-gtk.so.1()(64bit) libggz.so.2()(64bit) libggzcore.so.9()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) ggz-gtk-client-devel-0.0.14-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm ggz-gtk-client-devel = 0.0.14-2.fc9 = ggz-client-libs-devel ggz-gtk-client = 0.0.14-2.fc9 gtk2-devel libggz-devel libggz-gtk.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig is called properly. * unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031943.m13JhxwD023062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-03 14:43 EST ------- I've found that in Fedora7 is available only pam_usb-0.3.3 and this is not good. The problem is that in the 0.4.x series certificates have been replaced by One Time Pads, so upgrading from pam_usb-0.3.3 to pam_usb-0.4.2 is impossible without loosing the old settings. pam_usb-0.3.3 is really old and obsolete, the security model of pam_usb-0.4.2 is more powerfull and a lot of bugs was fixed, so I think that the users who are still using pam_usb-0.3.3 should upgrade to the new version and recreate from scratch their settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] New: Review Request: incollector - Information collector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Incollector is an application to collect various kinds of information (like notes, conversation logs, quotes, serial numbers, source code, web addresses, words). All the entries can be tagged, so you can find them very easily. There are also search folders which allows you to search for entries by specified criteria. You can also export (and import, of course) entries to an external file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 19:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802031953.m13JrrXS004747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnovy at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-03 14:53 EST ------- Adding Jindrich to the CC because we co-maintain timidity++ (In reply to comment #11) > Well, okay. I will recheck this later. > > A question: > Do you have any idea to deal with %_sysconfdir/timidity.cfg? > What I am thinking now is > - Each rpms providing timidity++ has its own patch config file > under %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/, with the name having some > prefix indicating priority, for example > %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/00-soundfont.cfg > > - And when a rpm providing timidity patches is installed, it calls > a script in timidity++-base (for example) to update > %_sysconfdir/timidity.cfg (marked as %verify(not size md5 mtime) ) > > - Sysadmin can "edit" timidity.cfg by adding his/her own configuration > file under %_sysconfdir/timidity-patches/ and calling registration > script. > I like the idea of having a directory with per soundfont timidity.cfg for the patch config files. But I'm not sure this is the best way forward ... First of all its important to understand that there are 2 users of /etc/timidity.cfg : 1) timidity(++) itself a full midi synth meant for musicians mostly 2) timidity deratives, consisting of atleast: SDL_mixer, allegro, libtimidity, wildmidi. Which are all midi playing libs mean't for embedding in another application and typically have less sound quality and matching much less CPU usage. One of the problems is the timidity deratives only support a subset of /etc/timidity.cfg syntax. Most noteworthy timidity++ supports a new soundfont statement, which allows it to directly use .sf2 soundfonts / patches, which means the whole conversion to GUS patch format can be skipped, and importantly, since .sf2 is a much newer format it also includes some additional details making timidity++ sound significantly better when directly using the .sf2 file. Also the priority ranking you propose is impossible IMHO. With soundfont's there always is a tradeoff between size and quality. Which not only involves diskspace usage, but also involves memory usage when playing back a midi file. Clearly the best tradeoff between memory usage and quality lies differently between the standalone timidity++ and the versions meant for embedding in other programs and the tradeoff also is dependent on the hardware capabilities of the used system. Well that about concludes describing the problem. --- Now to a solution. The solution I would like to propose is to make the 2 different usage groups mentioned above (stand alone player versus embedded into other applications) use 2 different config files. I propose to use /etc/timidity.cfg for the embedded case, as that is what all 4 embedded variants currently default too. Also by having an /etc/timidity.cfg which does not use any of the later timidity.cfg extensions added by timidity++ there will always be an /etc/timidity.cfg present which is compatible with whatever is looking for it, even manually installed applications. timidity++ will then be patches to first search for /etc/timidity++.cfg and only if that is not present fallback to /etc/timidity.cfg. So that a different cfg file can be made and used for the standalone player case. The idea is to have /etc/timidity++.cfg only contain a single "soundfont .... .sf2" line, as the standalone player performs best with a .sf2 file. The default versions of both .cfg files will get some comment lines at the top explaining the difference, for /etc/timidity.cfg this will be: # Warning do not modify this file if you want to change the setting for # timidity++, the standalone midi player. This file contains a timidity # compatible patch configuration for applications / libraries which want GUS / # timidty format patches, like for example SDL_mixer, allegro and libtimidity. # # If you want to change the configuration for timidity++, edit /etc/timidity++.cfg # instead. Only change this file if you want to change the configuration for # other GUS / timidity format patch using applications --- With this mechanism (2 config files) in place I don't think there is a need to have a dir with patch config files. For /etc/timidity.cfg one best breed compromise between size and quality can be choosen (keeping in mind the embedded nature of its users). Given that I've currently only found 2 soundfonts which can be freely redistributed, this and plain PersonalCopy, the choose is easy. This one, as plain PersonalCopy is twice the size and thats way too big for the embedded usage scenario. As for /etc/timidity++.cfg, determining which soundfont is the best is going to be hard, if not impossible. But there is no need for any per soundfont config file storage, as each .sf2 file is a standalone unit including all needed cfg settings in the file itself, all thats needed in /etc/timidity++.cfg is just a single line pointing to the soundfont one wants to use. --- This leaves the question howto make sure atleast a single soundfont gets installed when timidity++ gets installed, for this I would like to suggest making timidity++ having a Requires on the virtual provides soundfont2, and make all soundfont packages Provide: soundfont2. That and all .sf2 files should be installed under /usr/share/soundfonts. Then /etc/timidity++.cfg can be generated in a %post (install only not upgrade) to point to the first .sf2 file listed in usr/share/soundfonts . There will always be atleast one such file because of the Requires: soundfont2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:02:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032002.m13K22Tq026389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-03 15:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > i tried looking up the license and it only shows up on one page in google at > http://www.thepromisedlan.org/flatnuke/sections/Download/Freedom/LICENSE-libraries-linux.txt > under "xmlrpc-epi license". i'm not sure if this is can be packaged in fedora > based on the license, and if it can, what do we call it? > The license listed here: http://xmlrpc-epi.sourceforge.net/main.php?t=license Is perfectly fine, what makes you unsure about this? Its just a variant of the MIT license, and as such we will call it MIT, more specific see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT And then do a word for word comparision between the xmlrpc-epi and the "Modern Style with sublicense" MIT variant. Notice how they are almost 100% the same? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032002.m13K2jHJ006875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 15:02 EST ------- The release should be at least 16+1 since 16 is the current dvipng from texlive release. there is no dvigif info manual. I don't think the Provides for dvigif is useful. The kpathsea requires is also certainly unneeded since it should be automatically detected. I suggest using make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep the man page timestamp. To keep the changelogs timestamp, you can use iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF8 $i > $i.utf8 && touch -r $i $i.utf8 && mv $i.utf8 $i I suggest removing the .gz from the file names in the install-info scriptlets, install-info does it automatically. I also suggest using globs for man pages and info files, like %{_infodir}/dvipng.info* %{_mandir}/man1/dvigif.1* %{_mandir}/man1/dvipng.1* The license of the doc seems to be the OFSFDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:16:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032016.m13KGRaT028911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-03 15:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:21:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032021.m13KLq7b029706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-03 15:21 EST ------- cvs done. I might have asked before, but will again: Any reason for the cvsextras commits no? This does mean that other maintainers can't help with this package if you are away or unavailable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399301] Review Request: glusterfs - Cluster File System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032020.m13KK4lZ009849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glusterfs - Cluster File System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399301 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-03 15:20 EST ------- I've rebuilt glusterfs on all requested branches. The tricky ones were : * Both EL, for which I added the "--without client" rebuild option. * EL-4 in which python is too old, so I added the "--without python" option. Maybe I'll poke upstream about the fact that it would have been much easier for me if the features just got disabled if the requirements aren't met, as it's currently required to explicitly pass configure options to disable the features when such is the case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:28:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032028.m13KS9f6011044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-03 15:28 EST ------- I know, what this means. This package has nearly no upstream activity and I made the worse experience, that packagers are more likely to break somebody's package rather helping - sorry (add feature A, but A is know to break B or similar cases). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032030.m13KUMFT031152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 15:30 EST ------- two other thoughts -- 1. should all of the subpackages have the same documentation files, or are we going to consider that redundant? rpmlint complains about there being no documentation in the subpackages. 2. *-examples installs the examples in %{_bindir}, and the examples have relatively generic names. this seems like it could potentially cause conflicts with other packages. shouldn't they be store within %doc, inside an EXAMPLES directory or the like? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 20:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 15:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409511] Review Request: libmlx4 - Mellanox ConnectX InfiniBand HCA Userspace Driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032048.m13Kmv4F014298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libmlx4 - Mellanox ConnectX InfiniBand HCA Userspace Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409511 rolandd at cisco.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rolandd at cisco.com 2008-02-03 15:48 EST ------- Successfully built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 21:36:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032136.m13Lakr5022588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-03 16:36 EST ------- Scott says the example scripts are under GPLv2 just like upstart itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 21:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:54:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032154.m13LsDVJ024853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-03 16:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipng-1.9-50.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Feb 3 2007 Jonathan G. Underwood - 1.9-50 - Remove kpathsea Requires - Add OFSFDL license tag - Make INSTALL use install -p - Preserve time stamp of ChangeLog and ChangeLog.0 files - Use globbing in filelist - Remove .gz from the end of filenames in install-info commands - Bump release to 50 to fix up upgrade path from current dvipng package from texlive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032208.m13M8JTv027547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-03 17:08 EST ------- Thanks for corrections in comment #3. I just looked at some "historical" packages and not on wiki. :-) BTW, after find . -name .svn | xargs rm -rf find . -name .cvsignore | xargs rm rm -rf autom4te.cache in librep-0.17 directory a size of the original source archive drops down by roughly 2/3rd without, of course, affecting a compilation in any way and size differences in a resulting src.rpm are of a similar order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:19:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032219.m13MJc70029055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-03 17:19 EST ------- 38201 (perl-ccom): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. 38199 (perl-ccom): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Package: perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc9 Tag: dist-f9 Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032227.m13MRQZ8030410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-03 17:27 EST ------- perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032228.m13MSLlu017540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-03 17:28 EST ------- Similar size considerations apply in this case as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250#c5 Additionally there is also ChangeLog~ which happens to be identical to ChangeLog. After unpacking src.rpm package 'file rep-gtk-0.18.svn20060131.tar.gz' prints: ".... bzip2 compressed data, block size = 900k". Ahem ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032229.m13MTkjc030566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-03 17:29 EST ------- perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 22:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 17:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032251.m13MpcFK001714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 17:51 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software * follow guidelines * match upstream: 9526347a202694ad235d731d9d3de91f xautolock-2.2.tgz * %files section right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 23:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032303.m13N37Kx023041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-03 18:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xautolock Short Description: Launches a program when your X session has been idle Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: ianweller Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 23:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032308.m13N8TbT023854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 18:08 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * follow packaging guidelines * free software * works as intended * match upstream: 9107065e4da9a18dfff2c1a76fbbf919 dvipng-1.9.tar.gz * %files section right APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 23:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] New: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap-0.2.19-1.src.rpm Unicap provides a uniform interface to video capture devices. It allows applications to use any supported video capture device via a single API. The included ucil library provides easy to use functions to render text and graphic overlays onto video images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 23:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032317.m13NHjgi005776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-03 18:17 EST ------- Splendid, cheers Patrice. Can I put you as a co-maintainer? Jindrich - same question to you - are you willing to be a co-maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 3 23:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802032330.m13NUKtT027506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-03 18:30 EST ------- Yes, you can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 00:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040000.m1400Uxu032006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-03 19:00 EST ------- Please do not do that. You can introduce such incompatibilities in a major Fedora release, but it is not at all proper to just break the system of someone who does the prudent thing and lets their system update automatically. This goes doubly for a system that they might need to use to actually log into the system. Honestly I wouldn't even try to introduce this package into Fedora 8, because a user who hasd pam_usb installed and upgraded from F7 to F8 still has 0.3.3 installed. I would put the new package into rawhide and make sure that the release notes indicate the procedure which pam_usb users will need to go through to update things properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 00:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 19:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devil - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040005.m1405qVl013132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devil - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-03 19:05 EST ------- Sounds fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 01:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040114.m141EFWE023002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 michal at harddata.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal at harddata.com ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-03 20:14 EST ------- Once again 'autom4te.cache' is at least superfluous in a source archive. I am not sure if wrong definitions can be picked up from there but there is at least a potential. On http://sawfish.wikia.com/wiki/Patches there are some patches which apply to 1.3.2. It appears that at least Titlebar_updates Utf_8_names_fix Pango_draw()_ignores_font would be a good idea to add to the current sources if not other as well. Whomever will eventually "own" that should subscribe to a mailing list at http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/sawfish-list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 01:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040142.m141gL2h014275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-03 20:42 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dvipng Short Description: Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format Owners: jgu,pertusus,jnovy Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 01:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040143.m141hBEt014367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-03 20:43 EST ------- Jindrich - have added you as a co-maintainer, but if you'd rather not be, it's trivial to change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 01:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431386] New: Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431386 Summary: Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/rkhunter/rkhunter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/rkhunter/rkhunter-1.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Rootkit Hunter (RKH) is an easy-to-use tool which checks computers running UNIX (clones) for the presence of rootkits and other unwanted tools. This is a re-review of this package, as it's been orphaned for quite some time, and I wish to revive it. I have simplified the old spec a great deal and updated it to the latest version. This version does not ship the perl scripts for sha1/md5 summing, instead using installed executables, or nothing if they are not installed. Happy to take input on how better to handle this. There is also a (rather large) diff against the last spec in cvs at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/rkhunter/old-spec.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 01:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040156.m141uPTg028986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 02:35:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040235.m142ZCCR002239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-03 21:35 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint says: libgringotts.x86_64: E: summary-too-long The libgringotts provides a backend for managing encrypted data files on the disk which indeed is too long. How about changing "The libgringotts provides a" to just "A". There's no reason to mention the name of the package in the summary, and this change would shorten it and make the English sound a bit better. You might as well change "the disk" to "disk" since that's how we tend to say it. In addition, as Bill mentioned in comment 3, you might as well use the nice description provided in the README file: ---- libGringotts is a small, easy-to-use, thread-safe C library originally developed for Gringotts; its purpose is to encapsulate data (generic: ASCII, but also binary data) in an encrypted and compressed structure, to be written in a file or used elseway. It makes use of strong encryption algorithms, to ensure the data are as safe as possible, and allow the user to have the complete control over all the algorithms used in the process. ---- which is much more useful than what you have currently in %description. I note version 1.2.9 was released around the time you submitted this; any reason for not submitting that version? The -devel package installs a .pc file but does not depend on pkgconfig. * source files match upstream: a75e6f757b975d3da662fe7ea2d985f358f31ad2dede1a222bb4aa403d0dbfd1 libgringotts-1.2.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary needs a tweak X you should probably the nuice description upstream provides. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is not being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. X final provides and requires: libgringotts-1.2.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm libgringotts.so.2()(64bit) libgringotts = 1.2.1-2.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libbz2.so.1()(64bit) libgringotts.so.2()(64bit) libmcrypt.so.4()(64bit) libmhash.so.2()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libgringotts-devel-1.2.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm libgringotts-devel = 1.2.1-2.fc9 = libgringotts = 1.2.1-2.fc9 libgringotts.so.2()(64bit) (no dependency on pkgconfig) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. X directory ownership issue in -devel package due to the lack of a pkgconfig dependency. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. X pkgconfig files present and in the -devel package, but no pkgconfig dependnecy. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 03:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040345.m143j3Jv031959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 22:45 EST ------- build.log gave me + /usr/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh /var/tmp/incollector-1.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild incollector No translations found for incollector in /var/tmp/incollector-1.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild ===> missing BR: gettext desktop-file-utils any reason to exclude %exclude %{_datadir}/locale/be-latin/LC_MESSAGES/incollector.mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 03:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040358.m143wdkp014021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 22:58 EST ------- Source URL should be http://www.incollector.devnull.pl/download/sources/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 04:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040413.m144Dx8I003595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 23:13 EST ------- mock build is ok. 1) missing Requires: pkgconfig in -devel, drop pkgconfig as BR from main package. 2) rpmlint gave me unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libvid21394.so libvid21394.so.0.0.0 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libdcam.so libdcam.so.0.0.0 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libv4l2.so libv4l2.so.0.0.0 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libv4l.so libv4l.so.0.0.0 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. unicap-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. 3) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 04:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040421.m144Lnne004887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 23:21 EST ------- oops clicked submit button 3) can you also include APIs and examples to -devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 04:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040429.m144Tqbl005718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 23:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I updated the package: > http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop.spec > http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop-0.3-2.fc9.src.rpm > > ad 1) latencytop-standard-cflags.patch now removes the extra whitespace. Can't see this fixed in new SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 04:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040444.m144iIpL020578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 23:44 EST ------- Can you tell me how can I test this on rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 04:41:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040441.m144fjUD020453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-03 23:41 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide). + rpmlint on for SRPM and RPM. latencytop.i386: W: no-documentation + source files match upstream. 3ed2878fb7772e2a500ec71aa01abbb2 latencytop-0.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in source code. - %doc files NOT present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Compiler flags used correctly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHHOULD: 1)Better recreate latencytop-standard-cflags.patch that will remove unnecessary space caught in last few lines of patch. 2)Try to ask upstream to include some README where it should be written what this tool does and what are its limitations like this works on kernel >= 2.6.24 3) Hope to see upstream will include license file in next upstream release. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 05:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040506.m1456uYE024573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 00:06 EST ------- When installed its not working because first time we try to use it try to find .xhotkeys under your $HOME. I think you better remove SOURCE1 and provide upstream desktop only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 05:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040511.m145BvkZ025366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-04 00:11 EST ------- Peter did you forget about this.. also do you have a review you want to swap for this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 05:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040514.m145E6fO012502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 00:14 EST ------- I think modifying SOURCE1 desktop file to include --config is enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 05:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 00:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040559.m145x4Qu032222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 00:59 EST ------- I think good to have all plugins requires main package as Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Good to add following files to %doc ChangeLog doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS-gyvoice.txt doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS.txt doc/txt/COPYING doc/html/gyachi-help.html Source URL should be => http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 06:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040613.m146D85I002588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |peter at thecodergeek.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-02-04 01:13 EST ------- Aack, sorry about that. I spent most of the weekend out with friends/family and forgot about this entirely. Rest assured it will be my first priority after class tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 06:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:17:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040617.m146HhDm022943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-04 01:17 EST ------- X summary needs a tweak Fixed X you should probably the nuice description upstream provides. Fixed X directory ownership issue in -devel package due to the lack of a pkgconfig dependency. fixed X pkgconfig files present and in the -devel package, but no pkgconfig dependnecy. fixed I'm on the way to the school. I'll give new SPEC and SRPM when I'll be back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 06:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040642.m146gG8D007562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |inconsoleata-fonts - A |inconsoleata-fonts - A |monospace font, designed for|monospace font, designed for |code listings and the like, |code listings and the like, |in print |in print Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 06:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040655.m146tKWp029284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 01:55 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 378f8830bc66804d5fe2e7338598e654 Inconsolata.sfd + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. strings Inconsolata.sfd | grep OFL Copyright: Created by Raph Levien using his own tools and FontForge. Copyright 2006 Raph Levien. Released under the SIL Open Font License, http://scripts.sil.org/OFL. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + followed fonts packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 07:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040705.m1475fMQ031133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-04 02:05 EST ------- new revision: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 07:30:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040730.m147Ucme015112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ssalevan at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-04 02:30 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 07:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040734.m147YsrR015492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-04 02:34 EST ------- I hope someone else would review this ticket, however: - does not build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394014 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394020 You can check this by koji scratch build. - Please check directory ownership issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 07:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040739.m147dUlH003244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-04 02:39 EST ------- to 2): The relative symlinks are pointing to files of the base package or did I misread something? And the error seems to result from the warnings. Because where to put the *.so files/links when not in /usr/lib? to 3): APIs? doc/apis seems to be nearly (?) the same like the gtk-doc stuff or was my look to that too fast? Adding examples is no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 08:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:09:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040809.m1489ECV020894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 03:09 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm I exclude %exclude %{_datadir}/locale/be-latin/LC_MESSAGES/incollector.mo because rpmlint warns: incollector.i386: E: incorrect-locale-subdir /usr/share/locale/be-latin/LC_MESSAGES/incollector.mo Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 08:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040810.m148AEa3021368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - Application to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-04 03:10 EST ------- Thanks to Marek, Xavier and Mamoru for the review, and Kevin for the CVS request! I've imported and built it on all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 08:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040837.m148bgVt012210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 03:37 EST ------- Rahul, Considering above koji build failed, you can try to add ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 08:49:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040849.m148nDtS013941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-04 03:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Rahul, > Considering above koji build failed, you can try to add > ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 x86_64 That is never the right answer. ever. please fix it on all arches not excluding most -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 08:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040855.m148tOri015315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 03:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Rahul, > > Considering above koji build failed, you can try to add > > ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 x86_64 > > That is never the right answer. ever. please fix it on all arches not > excluding most Sorry. I saw some packages with ExcludeArch in Fedora, so I thought we can do same here also. Thanks for your quick reply here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040901.m1491TZo029723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-04 04:01 EST ------- Dennis Gilmore, This package simply doesn't build on these architectures. I have cc'ed the upstream maintainer who should be aware of this. Added ExcludeArch's for now if that helps move the review forward. http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:17:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040917.m149HChJ019741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 04:17 EST ------- I think you can try to use sed to replace be-latin.* to be at latin.* in build directory and also you need to have following %prep pushd po mv be-latin.po be at latin.po mv be-latin.gmo be at latin.gmo popd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040923.m149N45Y001600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 04:23 EST ------- you just need to use following in %prep sed -i 's|be-latin|be at latin|' configure pushd po mv be-latin.po be at latin.po mv be-latin.gmo be at latin.gmo popd and this will solve your problem of rpmlint error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040929.m149ThaL002785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 04:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > to 2): The relative symlinks are pointing to files of the base package or did > I misread something? And the error seems to result from the warnings. Because > where to put the *.so files/links when not in /usr/lib? > I installed this and looks ok. > to 3): APIs? doc/apis seems to be nearly (?) the same like the gtk-doc stuff or > was my look to that too fast? Adding examples is no problem. yes. APIs are already there. Only examples now you need to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040932.m149W94V022536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-04 04:32 EST ------- Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:30:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040930.m149U8S9003214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 04:30 EST ------- and please take care of point 1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040937.m149bI4C004495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 04:37 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040955.m149tAUq026727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |430295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 09:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430295] Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802040955.m149t9ie026693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430295 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427162 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:04:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430295] Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041004.m14A4JLU028587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430295 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:04 EST ------- I'll take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041023.m14ANcJ8032056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:23 EST ------- koji build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394153 SHOULD: Not use macro for install command "%{__install} -p". Just use "install -p" Because you have not used macros for commands rm , make in spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:26:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041026.m14AQ1dU032668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:26 EST ------- Axel, I see no improvement about the compat location field with this version. I've learn that when ivtv was in work to be merged within the kernel, they was a problem because it was using it owns firmware loader, instead of the one within the kernel. Actually the compat needs may not be related to using hotplug or else, but using the firmware loader of an older ivtv version when it wasn't merged in yet. I don't knwow the status of userland app (mythtv), that can use the kernel version or the "external" version. Am I right ? or the compat location is only related to have the same package for all dist ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041034.m14AY51V014702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:34 EST ------- This worked for me ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:44:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:44:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041044.m14Ai7qU003227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:44 EST ------- Sorry, but could you repeat what have I to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041045.m14AjVWf003804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 05:45 EST ------- Actually it should be ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha ----from gtk-sharp2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 10:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041057.m14AvNj7018930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-02-04 05:57 EST ------- The splitting packages is ok for me. I don't know in which group should be speex-tools have been. Do you? I've also problem with removing %makeinstall macro. Maybe it can't be removed because of strange autotolls. And the last problem with moving .so files into -devel made these messages: rpmlint i686/speex-devel-1.2-0.4.beta3.i686.rpm speex-devel.i686: W: no-documentation speex-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libspeexdsp.so.1.4.0 speex-devel.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libspeexdsp.so.1.4.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041107.m14B77ov007588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 06:07 EST ------- Whooops I wrote bad link do SRPMS: SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:07:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041107.m14B7mIM021041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 06:07 EST ------- Here is correct link: SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041106.m14B6XkQ020924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 06:06 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] New: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets-0.1.13-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Planets is a simple interactive program for playing with simulations of planetary systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041110.m14BA7As008112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-04 06:10 EST ------- SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo-0.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo.spec Bumpity bump bump bump to 0.3.1 as it was just released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041152.m14BqJRn014561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-02-04 06:52 EST ------- in the meantime are the packages here: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/speex/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 11:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041159.m14BxwpW015577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 06:59 EST ------- your SOURCE1 file should look like this [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Xhotkeys GenericName=Xhotkeys Comment=Hotkeys for the X-Window Exec=xhotkeys --config Icon=xhotkeys Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=Utility; GenericName[pl_PL]=Xhotkeys Note:- I suggest adding --config in Exec line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:03:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041203.m14C3n90016740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041210.m14CAEUY018181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:10 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/xhotkeys/xhotkeys-0.9.8.3-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:08:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041208.m14C8gKh017687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:08 EST ------- Drop unnecessary documentation files => BUGS INSTALL_w32.txt FILES BINFILES INSTALL INSTALL.txt README.txt use rpmmacros in %files for man file /usr/share/man/man1/planets.1.gz to %{_mandir}/man1/planets.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041216.m14CGMWj019132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:16 EST ------- koji build failed for ppc64 because of No Package Found for ocaml-camlp4-devel No Package Found for ocaml-labltk-devel on ppc64 koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394314 You want to follow guidelines given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml#head-d6d0bc21de370e51e9ca9bf5bc543224e2c668d4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041219.m14CJE3b032695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-04 07:19 EST ------- re 1) We must have a misunderstanding about what whitespace you meant. I thought you referred to the extra line. Maybe you wanted me to drop the second hunk of the patch completely? re 2 and 3) I agree it would be nice if upstream provided a README. I already asked for one when I was asking for the COPYING file. We'll see if a new upstream version adds them. I can see Rawhide has kernel-2.6.24-9 currently. This kernel does not have LATENCYTOP support yet. The patch was merged upstream after the release of 2.6.24 in git commit 9745512ce... "sched: latencytop support". So you'd need to compile the kernel from the current git tree. Make sure you have CONFIG_LATENCYTOP enabled. After boot, start the measurement with: echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/latencytop Then you can run latencytop and see the output similar to the screenshot at http://www.latencytop.org/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041219.m14CJQeR019401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:19 EST ------- oops you add "----from gtk-sharp2.spec" remove this text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:29:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041229.m14CT071002027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > re 1) We must have a misunderstanding about what whitespace you meant. I thought > you referred to the extra line. Maybe you wanted me to drop the second hunk of > the patch completely? Yes. I mean following lines from patch to be removed ============================================================================= # # The w in -lncursesw is not a typo; it is the wide-character version @@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ LDF = -Wl,--as-needed `pkg-config --libs # libncursesw5-dev package. # latencytop: latencytop.o display.o latencytop.h translate.o Makefile - gcc $(CFLAGS) latencytop.o display.o translate.o $(LDF)-o latencytop - + gcc $(CFLAGS) latencytop.o display.o translate.o $(LDF) -o latencytop clean: rm -f *~ latencytop DEADJOE *.o ========================================================================= > > re 2 and 3) I agree it would be nice if upstream provided a README. I already > asked for one when I was asking for the COPYING file. We'll see if a new > upstream version adds them. Thanks. > > > I can see Rawhide has kernel-2.6.24-9 currently. This kernel does not have > LATENCYTOP support yet. The patch was merged upstream after the release of > 2.6.24 in git commit 9745512ce... "sched: latencytop support". > So you'd need to compile the kernel from the current git tree. Make sure you > have CONFIG_LATENCYTOP enabled. After boot, start the measurement with: > echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/latencytop > Then you can run latencytop and see the output similar to the screenshot at > http://www.latencytop.org/ . Hope to see our kernels will get compiled with CONFIG_LATENCYTOP enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041229.m14CTkoQ021166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-04 07:29 EST ------- Hmm, looks like ExcludeArch: ppc64 might be in order. Concur? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041236.m14Ca4el022545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:36 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/incollector/incollector-1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041240.m14CerKV004202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:40 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394380 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 6544b487e23ab1290078cff0f2e96a6f xhotkeys_0.9.8.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041247.m14ClsYt024337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041247.m14Clh7N005549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xhotkeys Short Description: Hotkeys for the X-Window Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041245.m14Cj5XM005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:45 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394396 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint complains for RPM as incollector.i386: E: no-binary incollector.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib But these can be ignored for mono packages. + source files match upstream. da510a279ebb5e8ebf9dbdcb2fc1cf18 incollector-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file handled correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 12:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041251.m14CpKSh006320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-04 07:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: incollector Short Description: Information collector Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 13:28:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041328.m14DS9kP013730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-02-04 08:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > [XX] spec file name matches base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec > - vodovod.spec.0.10 was odd, not sure if that was just for your hosting or > what this is only a primitive VCS to be sure that the linked file does not change and so two people are not referring different state of things - as you noted in comment #3, I do not use the suffix for packaging (In reply to comment #6) > line 4, summary: probably shouldn't contain > the package name. ops, I've copied this and forgot about the rule > also, should the comment in the .desktop file have a period at the end? probably not, removing (In reply to comment #7) > * This package does not build on dist-f9. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=392156 > A proposed patch is attached. thanks, included > * On build fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly > honored ("Compiler flags" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > Using > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > make %{?_smp_mflags} \ > CC="%{__cxx} %{optflags}" > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > is good for this package. well, the guidelines could be more verbose about this ... thanks, added > - Desktop icon must be updated ("GTK+ icon cache" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) thanks, included - once more, it could be mentioned within the guidelines (I'm KDE user, so ...) new version: http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/vodovod/vodovod.spec.1.10-2 http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/vodovod/vodovod-1.10-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 14:36:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041436.m14Eaa5c014466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-02-04 09:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ggz-gtk-client Short Description: Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone Owners: bpepple Branches: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 14:34:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431320] Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041434.m14EY9uv013740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb - Hardware authentication using ordinary USB Flash Drives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431320 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-04 09:34 EST ------- I've investigated deeply and I've found an interesting thing: pam_usb-0.3.3 and pam_usb-0.4.2 store their settings in different places, so upgrading from 0.3.3 to 0.4.2 will not remove the old settings. I've installed and configured pam_usb-0.3.3 in Fedora7 and then I upgraded it to pam_usb-0.4.2; then I downgraded to pam_usb-0.3.3 again and the old settings was still there and it works normally like before. So I think we could insert the new pam_usb-0.4.2 in RawHide and then in Fedora9, and inform the users that after the upgrade their old settings will be ignored but won't be erased. So the users can choose between upgrade to the new pam_usb-0.4.2 and create the new settings from scratch or not to upgrade and still use pam_usb-0.3.3. If they install pam_usb-0.4.2 by mistake they can downgrade to pam_usb-0.3.3 and it will works again. In my opinion that upgrade to pam_usb-0.4.2 in Fedora9 is the right thing, because it's more secure and reliable, a lot of bugs was fixed, new functionality was added, and it's more easy to configure with the new tool pamusb-conf. pam_usb-0.3.3 instead is more difficult to configure and is less reliable because it's sufficient to copy the private key in the usb device to grant the access to the account of the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 15:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041501.m14F10r5018952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-04 10:00 EST ------- 1.2.9? It's Gringotts, not libGringotts, which is packaged by me. SRPM: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/libgringotts/libgringotts-lastest.src.rpm SPEC: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/libgringotts/libgringotts.spec PS: SRPM will stay constant - it will be link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 14:59:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041459.m14Ex5Ed018248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-04 09:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctorrent New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 15:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041531.m14FV59V006054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-04 10:31 EST ------- * The group could be "Applications/Multimedia". * The tools' man pages should also be moved to the tools sub-directory. * Instead of removing and excluding the *.a files, use --disable-static * You can remove the *.la in %install or %exclude them in the devel package * You need to have : * %{_libdir}/libspeex*.so.* in the main package * %{_libdir}/libspeex*.so in the devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 15:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427530] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041542.m14Fg2Wd007981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530 Bug 427530 depends on bug 427529, which changed state. Bug 427529 Summary: Please update to upstream version 2.6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427529 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 16:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226428] Merge Review: speex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041621.m14GLPbZ015204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: speex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226428 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-02-04 11:21 EST ------- I updated the files on the: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/speex/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 16:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041629.m14GTF1k016401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 mschmidt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-04 11:29 EST ------- Alright, I removed the second part of the patch. Now it's just a one-liner changing the CFLAGS. Updated package: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop-0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm http://michich.fedorapeople.org/latencytop/latencytop.spec Rawhide kernels usually do have many debugging options enabled. I expect LATENCYTOP will be enabled too. Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: latencytop Short Description: System latency monitor Owners: michich Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 16:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041647.m14GljxT019467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 16:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041658.m14GwsfM012301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-02-04 11:58 EST ------- Do you know how fix this? I'm looking on this issue ages :( make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/sim-0.9.4.3' + desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /var/tmp/sim-0.9.4.3-1.fc8-root-root/usr/share/applications/kde/sim.desktop Must specify one or more desktop files to install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 17:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041701.m14H1SxL022228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-04 12:01 EST ------- dist-f8-updates-candidate build with the patch in comment 16 applied is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=394937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 16:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041659.m14GxooN021438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-04 11:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293909) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293909&action=view) Patch to use external qca (qca-devel needed) Well, the attached patch should work to use external qca (qca-devel needed). However - Currently Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored - This package fails to build on dist-f9 (rawhide). Rawhide now uses g++43 and jabbin compilation fails with g++43 on many points... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 17:29:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041729.m14HTKPu026777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-04 12:29 EST ------- OK, then it would be nice to have a COPYING file in the tarball, at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 17:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041730.m14HUKlm027349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-04 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #3) > > As for the init script, it would seem to be logical that it just be added to the > > list of types in netfs, or similar. > > Looking at gfs2-utils, they seem to do the same thing as Ocfs2 (no mention of > Gfs2 in /etc/init.d/netfs either). > > From /etc/init.d/gfs2: > start) > if [ -n "$GFS2FSTAB" ] > then > action $"Mounting GFS2 filesystems: " mount -a -t gfs2 > fi > touch /var/lock/subsys/gfs2 > ;; > > > Can we do it this way until netfs is fixed up to understand Ocfs2? > Yes, it would just be nice to have a better infrastructure to do this rather than a pile of init scripts. Something for the future... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 17:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041736.m14HaSv1019258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-02-04 12:36 EST ------- Missing a BR, fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 17:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041756.m14HujhV022659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-04 12:56 EST ------- I can drop a copy of upstart's COPYING in the package for now, or do we have to wait for upstream to add one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 18:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:04:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225950] Merge Review: jpackage-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041804.m14I4264024146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: jpackage-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225950 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fitzsim at redhat.com |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-04 13:04 EST ------- rpmlint: Change Group tag to Applications/System, Utilities is not valid. Change license, JPackage License is invalid. I think BSD is closest. jpackage-utils.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/java/jpackage-release A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here I can't find the tarball on the upstream site, so I can't tell you what the Source0 tag should be changed to, but it must include a URL. The %description is a little on the large side, and sort of blind-sided me when I rpm -qi jpackage-utils. Not a blocker, just a suggestion. Otherwise, looks great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 18:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041807.m14I7f13024857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-04 13:07 EST ------- Drop upstart's in as Source2: (or whatever), maybe with a copy of the note from Scott until there's a new upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041911.m14JBF1l031310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-04 14:11 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM: alchemist.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/alchemist-1.0.37-2.fc8.src.rpm.5684/alchemist.spec The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8. Convert it for example using iconv(1). alchemist.src:10: W: prereq-use /sbin/ldconfig The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. alchemist.src:13: W: buildprereq-use libxml2 >= 2.3.8, libxslt >= 0.9.0, libxslt-devel >= 0.9.0 The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. alchemist.src:14: W: buildprereq-use doxygen >= 1.2.7, python-devel, zlib-devel The use of BuildPreReq is deprecated, build dependencies are always required before a package can be built. Use plain BuildRequires instead. alchemist.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A multi-sourced configuration back-end. Summary ends with a dot. alchemist.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8. alchemist.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. All need fixing. rpmlint on RPMS: alchemist-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/alchemist/blackbox/libforgeblackbox.so libforgeblackbox.so.0.0.0 The relative symbolic link points nowhere. Should be OK. In addition, the Source0 tag should include a URL, which should match what I'd find on the site in the URL. Static libs need to be in a -static package or dropped entirely. .la should be removed unless critically needed. Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041916.m14JGv3J032243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 opensource at till.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|opensource at till.name |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-02-04 14:16 EST ------- Sorry for slowing this down, I do not have the time currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041921.m14JL84f000817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-04 14:21 EST ------- branching to EPEL is only useful if there is a RHEL5 ocfs2 module out there somewhere... are there plans for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041920.m14JKqQg000769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 pauln at truemesh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pauln at truemesh.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 192867] Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041920.m14JKFdo009560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctorrent - BitTorrent Client written in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192867 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041921.m14JLe86009803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041932.m14JWGfY011999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041931.m14JVllH011919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:31 EST ------- Thanks for the speedy review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: inconsolata-fonts Short Description: A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print Owners: kevin Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041939.m14JdKw9013009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041935.m14JZxZ5012728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041941.m14JfR5u004500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041943.m14JhdK0004834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 19:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802041951.m14JpDdf006300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 14:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 20:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042003.m14K3LK5009298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-04 15:03 EST ------- Ah yes, EPEL follows the same guidelines as Fedora and doesn't have external kernel modules so forget I ever said that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 20:16:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042016.m14KGiEg011986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-04 15:16 EST ------- New upstream version, with fixed documentation. I re-enabled BR: on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Net-eBay.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Net-eBay-0.46-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 20:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042018.m14KIFO3012168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 bdpepple at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-02-04 15:18 EST ------- built. thanks for the review, Tibbs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 20:35:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225245] Merge Review: am-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042035.m14KZnrr023738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: am-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225245 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-04 15:35 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM: am-utils.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes amd The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. am-utils.src:86: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You use $RPM_SOURCE_DIR or %{_sourcedir} in your spec file. If you have to use a directory for building, use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead. am-utils.src:237: W: macro-in-%changelog pre Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. am-utils.src:408: W: macro-in-%changelog pre Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. am-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 33, tab: line 77) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. am-utils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Automount utilities including an updated version of Amd. Summary ends with a dot. am-utils.src: W: strange-permission am-utils.init 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Should all be fixed, except the last one. rpmlint on RPMS: am-utils.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/amd Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. Should this be marked config? am-utils.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /.automount The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. am-utils.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /.automount The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. am-utils.i386: E: non-readable /etc/amd.conf 0600 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). am-utils.i386: E: non-readable /etc/amd.net 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). These are OK. am-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libamu.so A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. Why is there not a -devel package? I see that the spec removes other .so files, why not put them in -devel or delete this one? am-utils.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Automount utilities including an updated version of Amd. Summary ends with a dot. am-utils.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 6.1.5-7 5:6.1.5-7.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. am-utils.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided amd If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Fix. am-utils.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/amd A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here See above. am-utils.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name amd The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. Would fixing this break anything? Other than that, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 21:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042117.m14LHb8n031167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-04 16:17 EST ------- Yeah, a devel package for just a single header seems somewhat of a waste. Matthias: Can you post updated packages and I can do a formal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 21:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042152.m14LqgiE028647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-04 16:52 EST ------- Yes, done: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap-0.2.19-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 22:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042220.m14MKmPR009861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-04 17:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Well, for 6.1u3-3: > > * uid > - On my system the number "43" is already used by > xfs (xorg-x11-xfs). > - BTW do you have any reason to prefer fedora-usermgmt? fedora-usermgmt creates IDs starting at a configurable base ID. Because certain files for gridengine really should be shared via NFS I want to try to have a common ID across a site. > * Requires(post) etc > - Please update Requires(post) etc on gridengine main > package. Fixed. > * Overwriting source > - As I said above, this can be avoided. See below. > * mandir > - Usually section 3 man files explain functions or so and > they should be in -devel package. Fixed. > * License > - I will propose the tag later after checking linkage > again. Thanks! (In reply to comment #24) > Created an attachment (id=293788) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293788&action=view) [edit] > A example spec file using %define afterwards > > You can use %define afterwards. A example is attached. Doesn't work for me. Log snippet from mock: + rm -rf /var/tmp/foo-0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild + mkdir -p /var/tmp/foo-0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/foo/ note that it doesn't make /var/tmp/foo-0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib/foo/i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 22:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042233.m14MXmcs011689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-04 17:33 EST ------- Your example works if the build directory is already expanded when rpmbuild is run, but not if it doesn't (as with mock). However, I was able to get around by using wildcards in the %files section. * Mon Feb 4 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 6.1u3-4 - Drop arch from source - Fix Requires() for main package - Move man3 to -devel http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-4.fc8.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 23:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042309.m14N92m3017848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-04 18:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293957&action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 23:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:07:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042307.m14N7V2x017756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-04 18:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I can't sponsor you but a quick review nevertheless: Thank you for the review - it has been very helpful and I've implemented the vast majority of what you've pointed out: I dropped the Exclusiveos tag and added a disttag. Also, I'm now using %{_datadir}, %{_initrddir} and %{python_sitearch} whenever possible. BuildRoot is now "%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{PACKAGE_VERSION}-%{PACKAGE_RELEASE}-root" which is one of the approved alternates which you mentioned. The requires line for ocfs2-tools-devel has been fixed - thanks for noticing that. A new spec file / srpm has been uploaded and I'll attach the spec to this bug. Since so much has changed, I bumped the release number: Spec URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-5.20080131git.fc8.src.rpm The rest of my comments follow: > You must drop all BuildRequires that are part of the default build root such as > bash. I think we're already clean with respect to buildrequires. There's certainly no bash line in there - maybe you were looking at the requires instead? > Why is there a Provides: ocfs2-tools-static = %{version}-%{release}? Can't you > dynamically link libraries? If not, you should provide a justification for > statically linking any libraries. > > Refer > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 The page you reference states: "When a package only provides static libraries you can place all the files in the *-devel subpackage. When doing this you also have to have a virtual Provide for the static package:" Ocfs2-tools is one such package, and I've followed the guidelines set out there. > Use make %{?_smp_mflags} if possible. Unfortunately, ocfs2-tools doesn't support parallel builds at this time. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 23:10:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042310.m14NAYON018297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2008-02-04 18:10 EST ------- ok MUST items with explanations: - rpmlint: ok $rpmlint -v libtune-0.14-5.fc8.i386.rpm libtune.i386: I: checking $rpmlint -v libtune-devel-0.14-5.fc8.i386.rpm libtune-devel.i386: I: checking libtune-devel.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/chtunedb libtune-devel.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/chtunedb libtune-devel.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name chtunedb $rpmlint -v tunables-base-data-2.6.23-0.14-5.fc8.i386.rpm tunables-base-data-2.6.23.i386: I: checking $rpmlint -v tunables-distro-data-0.14-5.fc8.i386.rpm tunables-distro-data.i386: I: checking The warnings for libtune-devel can be ignored. The 'chtunedb' script is the mechanism for the devel package to "harvest" kernel parameters (so if a new kernel is added they are automaticly regenerated). ok MUST items: - package name: ok. - spec file name match base package: ok. - package meet packaging guidelines: ok - package must contin approved license: ok - license field equal the actual license: ok - spec file written in American English: ok - spec file legible: ok - source files in rpmbuild match upstream: ok - package compile and build binary RPM: ok (built on f-7, f-8, f-9 under scratch koji build) - build dependencies listed in BuildRequires: ok - binary RPM which stores shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun: ok - a package must own all the directories it creates: ok - a package must not contain duplicates in %files: ok - permissions must be properly: ok - must have %clean section: ok - must use consistently use macros: ok - package must contain code or permissiable content: ok - if a package includes %doc it must not reflect the runtime of the application: ok - header files must be in -devel package: ok - if package contains library files with a suffix, then one ending with .so must be in -devel: ok - fully versioned depedency: ok - not have any .la archives :ok - package must not own files or directories already owned by other packages: ok - At the beginning of %install, the rm -Rf .. : ok - all filenames in the package must be valid UTF-8: ok N/A MUST items: - spec file handle locales using %find_lang: There are no translation usages on this package, hence N/A. - if package is relocatable ....: Package is not relocatable, hence N/A. - large doc should go in -doc subpackage .. : no big doc, hence N/A. - static libraries must be in .. : not using static libraries, hence N/A. - packages containing pkgconfig(..), not using pkgconfig, hence N/A. - package containing GUI .. : no GUI, hence N/A. ok SHOULD items with explanations. - usually subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. This package 'libtune' requires the 'tunabled-base-distro-%{version}' package instead of using the 'tunable-base-distro-%{version}-${release}'. This is done b/c the tunables-base-distro package can be respun many times during a release (for new kernels that might change their /proc or /sysfs layout) and there is absolutely no reason to re-release the libtune package. ok SHOULD items: - if the source package does not include license text... : it does have it: ok - test package in koji: ok - compile and build binary packages on all architecture: ok - test the package functions as described: ok - if scriptlets are used... : ok. N/A SHOULD items: - The placement of pkgconfig ... : N/A - If the package has file dependency on .. : N/A - The description and summary sections in the package should contain translations for supported Non-English language: not done. This package does not contain any localized information, hence no translation effort was involved and this is N/A. PACKAGE REVIEWED. ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 4 23:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 18:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802042344.m14NifVr014268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-04 18:44 EST ------- The command in the spec file looks good. What command did you use in Comment #14? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 00:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050042.m150gql6023595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-04 19:42 EST ------- I guess I misread the BuildRequires. Change the buildroot to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root The guidelines recommend against mixing two styles http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-f3d77b27a5d29dfc1f5600ef3fc836f2e317badf The part of the guidelines, I wanted you to refer to regarding static libs was, "In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless a compelling reason exists." If you do have compelling reasons, it would be good to specify that in the review. Other than those minor nit-picks, the latest spec looks ok to me. I did a scratch build of the latest ocfs2 srpm and it builds and installs correctly. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=395837 A sponsor has to do a official review and approve your spec before you get commit access. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 01:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050127.m151RjWA030859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 20:27 EST ------- unable to download upstream source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 01:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050127.m151R6HF006693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-04 20:27 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Thanks Patrice. Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 03:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050356.m153unG6030850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 22:56 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 03:55:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050355.m153tdad030658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-04 22:55 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 04:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050452.m154qac2006791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-04 23:52 EST ------- thanks kevin. srpms imported, koji build ok, added to bodhi == NEXTRELEASE == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 06:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050634.m156YICu023279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 01:34 EST ------- Koji build failed => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=396090 SHOULD: 1) Change defattr usage to defattr(-,root,root,-) 2) -devel description says only "The unicap-devel package includes header files and libraries necessary for for developing programs which use the unicap and ucil library." which missed to mention libunicapgtk library. Please add that to this description line. 3) Add README.troubleshooting to %docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 06:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050634.m156Yi3l015575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ghosler at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ghosler at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ghosler at redhat.com 2008-02-05 01:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=293980) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=293980&action=view) fix for compile problem on non-x86 platforms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 06:36:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:36:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050636.m156ahUO023948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From ghosler at redhat.com 2008-02-05 01:36 EST ------- I have created a patch (attached) which *should* address the non-x86 build problem. I specifically only addressed ppc64 ppc x86_64, but extending this to any other architecture is (at this point) a really trivial matter. I say "*should*" as I do not have a ppc/etc machine to physically test on. However, I extended the arch list to i386 (temporarily, for testing purposes only), and I got the desired result (the files which will fail, don't compile). See attachment (id=293980) -Greg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 07:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050729.m157TZb6031899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-02-05 02:29 EST ------- desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications/kde/sim.desktop files -f %{name}.lang %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-sim.desktop The whole spec is on: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/sim/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 08:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050800.m1580QjQ004273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 03:00 EST ------- Is this built for F-7 and F-8? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 08:06:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:06:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050806.m1586Mlo005619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 03:06 EST ------- As this package uses ocaml, I think good to follow same what ocaml used in SPEC => ExclusiveArch: alpha armv4l %{ix86} ia64 x86_64 ppc sparc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 08:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050829.m158T2Cj008615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-05 03:29 EST ------- hmm, weird, it works for me, I tested again this morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 08:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050834.m158YIm6009420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 03:34 EST ------- hey it worked now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 09:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050922.m159Mj5d019368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-05 04:22 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin-2.0-3.beta2a.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 09:23:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050923.m159NR81019492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-05 04:23 EST ------- Greg, Thanks for the patch. I managed to get it build across all the architectures with this patch applied. Unfortunate that other arch's besides x86 wont get voice support though. Revised spec and SRPM: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=396129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 09:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050943.m159hD7d015222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 04:43 EST ------- Please check directory ownership issue. For example, %_datadir/%name is not owned by any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 09:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050946.m159kZ3j016106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-02-05 04:46 EST ------- [huzaifas at huzaifas ~]$ rpmlint sawfish-1.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm W: sawfish summary-ended-with-dot An extensible window manager for the X Window System. W: sawfish invalid-license GPLv2 W: sawfish strange-permission sawfish.spec 0444 E: sawfish no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 09:52:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802050952.m159qTK1024653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-02-05 04:52 EST ------- The Changelog says * Thu Jan 31 2008 Rahul Sundaram -1.3.2-1 and the package is submitted by Ritesh Khadgaray (rkhadgar at redhat.com) any specific reason for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051001.m15A1N9G026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 05:01 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 175674e914326a6af84564acfb57286b Net-eBay-0.46.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test output is t/00-load.........# Testing Net::eBay 0.46, Perl 5.008008, /usr/bin/perl ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=22, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.64 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.69 CPU) + Package perl-Net-eBay-0.46-1.fc9 -> Provides: perl(Net::eBay) = 0.46 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(DateTime::Precise) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTML::FormatText) perl(HTML::PrettyPrinter) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder) perl(HTTP::Date) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(Net::eBay) perl(Text::Format) perl(XML::Dumper) perl(XML::Simple) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(vars) perl(warnings) SHOULD: Remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from make coammand APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051009.m15A9l0H020529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-05 05:09 EST ------- Thx Parag. I'll fix the last problem before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-eBay Short Description: Perl Interface to XML based eBay API Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:08:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051008.m15A8FnJ020427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-05 05:08 EST ------- I've no 64 bit system around, so I unluckily didn't find that. /usr/lib seems somehow to be hardcoded and not /usr/lib(64) depending on the arch. Do you think, it fits to do a mv /usr/lib %{_libdir}, if we're on x86_64 etc. during build or should I better really fix the code, inclulde as patch and send upstream? Shoulds are luckily no must, so I don't care about 1) - sorry 2) is accepted, will be corrected for the next build of course 3) seems just useless for non-packagers when reading the file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051035.m15AZqu8025431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ghosler at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 05:35 EST ------- will review this. I suggest replacing %files section of gyachi to ===================================================================== %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ABOUT-NLS ChangeLog doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS-gyvoice.txt doc/KNOWN_PROBLEMS.txt doc/txt/COPYING doc/html/gyachi-help.html %{_bindir}/%{name}* %{_datadir}/applications/*%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/%{name} %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{name}-* %dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins ======================================================================= And remove ExcludeArch line from SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051042.m15Agx8Z026579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 05:42 EST ------- Also, Good to preserve timestamps by replacing make install command as given below ============================================================== make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ============================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 10:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051049.m15AnjFQ002442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 05:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I've no 64 bit system around, so I unluckily didn't find that. /usr/lib seems > somehow to be hardcoded and not /usr/lib(64) depending on the arch. Do you think, > it fits to do a mv /usr/lib %{_libdir}, if we're on x86_64 etc. during build or > should I better really fix the code, inclulde as patch and send upstream? You better fix this in code and include patch in SRPM and send same to upstream also. > > Shoulds are luckily no must, so I don't care about 1) - sorry ok. > 2) is accepted, will be corrected for the next build of course hope to see that in next SRPM update. > 3) seems just useless for non-packagers when reading the file ohh. I thought it covers also "Runtime issues" which are useful to end user and also from configure output it said *** Please read the file README.troubleshooting *** *** if you have any trouble using this software. *** NOTE:-It said using this software not compiling/packaging this software. Anyway Ok if you will not include as its not a blocker :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:09:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051109.m15B9OCf031414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-05 06:09 EST ------- Revised spec and SRPM http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gyachi-1.1.0-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051113.m15BDWwL007238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 06:13 EST ------- Agreed. All of the above addressed, see original URLs. NVR not incremented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:14:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] New: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed-2.5.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: gfeed is an RSS feed reader for Linux and Gtk+ 2.0. It is designed to be a simple yet highly customizable reader, not an aggregator, which means it is designed for easy integration into a desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:32:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051132.m15BWe1C002705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-02-05 06:32 EST ------- URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/%{name} is better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:38:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:38:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051138.m15BcsR3003838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-05 06:38 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed-2.5.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431373] Review Request: incollector - Information collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051148.m15BmQkh012789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: incollector - Information collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431373 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-05 06:48 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:46:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051146.m15BkD0E012547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-05 06:46 EST ------- :-) I was about to construct package for QtCurve-0.55, and submit them to Fedora. Kelly, can you update to QtCurve-0.55 in bug #238816 and bug #238815, and also provide the KDE4 style? I am using this style in both Gtk2/KDE3/Qt4 apps, and my desktop now looks better. In my opinion, the current meta-package should not exist. Anyway, should it exist, then the requirements should be: kde-style-qtcurve = %{version}, gtk-qtcurve-engine = %{version} (In reply to comment #1) > imo, this is is kinda pointless, but who am I to judge? :) Rex, you are the maintainer of gtk-qt-engine. I do not understand your point, here. In my opinion, using QtCurve for both KDE3, KDE4 and Gtk is a better option than gtk-qt-engine, because it offers a quite-uniform look for all the desktop, even for KDE3/KDE4. Until all KDE3 applications are ported to KDE4, I will prefere to use QtCurve instead of a mix of Oxygen (for KDE4) and any other style for Gtk2/KDE3/Qt3. And, IMO, Oxygen is ugly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431175] Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051149.m15BnL1I005653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhotkeys - Hotkeys for the X-Window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431175 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-05 06:49 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 11:56:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051156.m15Bucxl007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-05 06:56 EST ------- My "pointless" comment was about the existence of the metapackage (as you seem to agree), and not anything against qtcurve itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051206.m15C6HOf009217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 07:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Agreed. All of the above addressed, see original URLs. NVR not incremented. which you should have done actually..... That will help to differentiate between exiting SRPM I have downloaded and new one to review it without confusion. Also, Changelog will suggest how review got progressed with written changes in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:13:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051213.m15CDxj4010448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051220.m15CKcpN018600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 07:20 EST ------- Fixed: Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/planets/planets-0.1.13-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:26:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051226.m15CQrM3019718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 07:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-4.fc8.src.rpm > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec Returns 404 (not found)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051231.m15CVtHp013634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 07:31 EST ------- As I said in comment 16: - This jabbin doesn't build on g++43 (i.e. rawhide) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=396315 I tried to fix this, however apparently it requires not a few fixes. I hope I have some time to try on this weekend, however I suggest that you ping to upstream. - Builds on dist-f8-updates-candidate, however Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. More patches or some sed trick or so is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:41:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051241.m15Cf974015272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-05 07:41 EST ------- Is icon working for you? I installed rpm and when tried to run gfeed I got options help only. will review this by tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 12:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051242.m15CgHAL022215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-05 07:42 EST ------- Oops, I didn't realize that this review was so old, that the initial packages were still in the old location I used to use :-) Updated packages (2.0.3-3) are here : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/openvpn-auth-ldap/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 13:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:17:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051317.m15DHonq021866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 08:17 EST ------- Well, I want to know how Jindrich thinks about your idea. (In reply to comment #12) Your idea seems good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 13:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238817] Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051349.m15Dni9U027337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fedora at norma | |lesup.org ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-05 08:49 EST ------- Sorry Rex for the misunderstanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 14:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051400.m15E0s8D029862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-05 09:00 EST ------- Yes icon is working. If you wrote example: "gfeed -f http://linux.pl/rss.php", new windows will open and icon will show. Thanks in advance for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 14:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051431.m15EVmSO003498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rezso at rdsor.ro Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rezso at rdsor.ro) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 09:31 EST ------- CC-ing new Balint e-mail. Balint, would you update this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 14:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051432.m15EWrYl011194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 09:32 EST ------- Would someone update this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 14:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430360] Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051431.m15EVUXD011050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-05 09:31 EST ------- Brian, feel free to add yourself as comaintainer in any capacity you wish for dep's libggz-devel, ggz-client-libs (and I'll add myself here as mostly an observer, if you don't mind). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 14:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296161] Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051434.m15EYQQJ011450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ical - An X Window System-based calendar program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 09:34 EST ------- Once CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051629.m15GTp5v027884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: antlr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225250] Merge Review: antlr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051629.m15GTWnu027867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: antlr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225250 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 11:29 EST ------- rpmlint on SRPM: antlr.src:375: W: macro-in-%changelog _bindir Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Fix. antlr.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 76) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. Fix. antlr.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Code Generators The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". I'd use Development/Tools. rpmlint on rpms: antlr.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/antlr/ANTLRUtil.hpp A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. etc. . .. Ok, due to the nature of the package. antlr.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.7.7-1jpp.6 0:2.7.7-1jpp.6.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. Fix. antlr-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm antlr-javadoc.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm It looks like these are necessary, so OK. Need to include something about how the RHCLEAN tarball can be produced from the upstream tarball. Mock build error: >> /usr/bin/make -C lib/cpp/antlr all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/antlr' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/antlr' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> /usr/bin/make -C lib/cpp/src all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make[3]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src' *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ANTLRUtil.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTFactory.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTNULLType.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/ASTRefCount.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/BaseAST.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/BitSet.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharBuffer.cpp *** compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharScanner.cpp In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/../../../lib/cpp/src/CharScanner.cpp:10: /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/scripts/../lib/cpp/antlr/CharScanner.hpp: In member function 'bool antlr::CharScannerLiteralsLess::operator /builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/scripts/../lib/cpp/antlr/CharScanner.hpp:565: error: 'strcasecmp' was not declared in this scope xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> E R R O R << ============================================================ g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasy ============================================================ Got an error while trying to execute command above. Error messages (if any) must have shown before. The exit code was: exit(1) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx make[3]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src/CharScanner.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp/src' make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib/cpp' make[1]: *** [all] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/antlr-2.7.7/lib' make: *** [all] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.85628 (%build) Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:45:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051645.m15Gj1LX006646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-05 11:45 EST ------- At least gnash depends on agg. I can take care of this package, as a gnash dependency. Would you accept me as a co-maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:56:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225676] Merge Review: dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051656.m15Gu3fb000665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051656.m15Gu6JG000697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225676, which changed state. Bug 225676 Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226669] Merge Review: zip In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051655.m15GtGX1000583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|varekova at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-05 11:55 EST ------- The bug should certainly be assigned to Ruben. But the comments should also be addressed, in my opinion the package is not really ready for inclusion without those comments addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225676] Merge Review: dbus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051655.m15Gtgta008849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225676 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-02-05 11:55 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 16:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051656.m15Gu5sp008992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(caolanm at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-02-05 11:56 EST ------- Sure, you can even be the sole maintainer if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051701.m15H1VG3002097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2008-02-05 12:01 EST ------- Yikes, so I need to retract the 'ACCEPT'/APPROVED part since I am not a sponser (per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b: First reviews for new packagers must be done by registered sponsors. Informal reviews can be done by anyone interested."). Next stage is actually for a sponsor to do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225252] Merge Review: apmd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051703.m15H3eCK002774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: apmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225252 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 12:03 EST ------- rpmlint on srpm: apmd.src:17: W: prereq-use chkconfig The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. Fix. apmd.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Advanced Power Management (APM) BIOS utilities for laptops. Summary ends with a dot. Fix. apmd.src: W: invalid-license GPL The value of the License tag was not recognized. Known values are: "Adobe", "AFL", "AGPLv1", "AGPLv3", "AMPAS BSD", "ARL", "ASL 1.0", "ASL 1.0+", "ASL 1.1", "ASL 1.1+", "ASL 2.0", "ASL 2.0+", "APSL 2.0", "APSL 2.0+", "Artistic 2.0", "Artistic clarified", "BitTorrent", "Boost", "BSD", "BSD with advertising", "CeCILL", "CDDL", "CPL", "Condor", "Copyright only", "Cryptix", "Crystal Stacker", "EPL", "eCos", "EFL 2.0", "EFL 2.0+", "EU Datagrid", "FTL", "Giftware", "Glide", "gnuplot", "GPL+", "GPL+ or Artistic", "GPLv2+ or Artistic", "GPLv2", "GPLv2 with exceptions", "GPLv2+", "GPLv2+ with exceptions", "GPLv3", "GPLv3 with exceptions", "GPLv3+", "GPLv3+ with exceptions", "IBM", "IJG", "ImageMagick", "iMatix", "Imlib2", "Intel ACPI", "Interbase", "ISC", "Jabber", "JasPer", "LGPLv2", "LGPLv2 with exceptions", "LGPLv2+", "LGPLv3", "LGPLv3+", "libtiff", "LPL", "LPPL", "mecab-ipadic", "MIT", "MPLv1.0", "MPLv1.0+", "MPLv1.1", "MPLv1.1+", "NCSA", "NGPL", "NOSL", "Netscape", "Nokia", "OpenLDAP", "OpenPBS", "OReilly", "OSL 1.0", "OSL 1.0+", "OSL 1.1", "OSL 1.1+", "OSL 2.0", "OSL 2.0+", "OSL 3.0", "OSL 3.0+", "OpenSSL", "Phorum", "PHP", "Public Domain", "Python", "QPL", "RPSL", "Ruby", "Sleepycat", "SISSL", "SLIB", "SPL", "TCL", "UCD", "Vim", "VNLSL", "VSL", "W3C", "WTFPL", "wxWindows", "xinetd", "Zend", "ZPLv1.0", "ZPLv1.0+", "ZPLv2.0", "ZPLv2.0+", "ZPLv2.1", "ZPLv2.1+", "zlib", "CDL", "FBSDDL", "GFDL", "IEEE", "OFSFDL", "Open Publication", "CC-BY", "CC-BY-SA", "DSL", "Free Art", "Arphic", "Baekmuk", "Bitstream Vera", "mplus", "OFL", "STIX", "Utopia", "XANO", "Redistributable, no modification permitted", "Freely redistributable without restriction". Fix, should be GPLv2+ apmd.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. Fix. apmd.src: W: strange-permission apmscript 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. apmd.src: W: strange-permission apmd.init 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. apmd.src: W: strange-permission laptopmode 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. Ok. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/laptopmode Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. apmd.i386: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/apmscript Executables must not be marked as config files because that may prevent upgrades from working correctly. If you need to be able to customize an executable, make it for example read a config file in /etc/sysconfig. These are fine for this package. apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/apmscript A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here apmd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/laptopmode A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here apmd.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. apmd.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/apmd The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. These are also fine. Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051733.m15HX12g016120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-05 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > Returns 404 (not found)... Sorry, should work now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051733.m15HXxcE016211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(hmandevteam at gmail. | |com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 12:33 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:35:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051735.m15HZIY3008620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rodolfo.alcazar at pa | |dep.org.bo) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 12:35 EST ------- What is the status of this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 17:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226147] Merge Review: mktemp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051744.m15HiMfM009906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mktemp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226147 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(than at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-05 12:44 EST ------- than, in that case, could you complete the package EOL process for mktemp as described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife so we can close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 18:17:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051817.m15IHCsO016288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 18:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051817.m15IH0O2024803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 18:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 13:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051841.m15Ifbmf020771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xfig https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429451] Review Request: maze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051917.m15JHQT4003320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-05 14:17 EST ------- I finally got around to packaging up a new version released by upstream, which includes a zlib license.txt now: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/magicmaze.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/magicmaze-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051917.m15JHI9n003282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 hmandevteam at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(hmandevteam at gmail.| |com) | ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-02-05 14:17 EST ------- sorry, i working on a project for my factory :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429451] Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051920.m15JKNpK027774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: maze - Board|Review Request: magicmaze - |game featuring a maze which |Board game featuring a maze |the players change each turn|which the players change | |each turn Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-05 14:20 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: magicmaze Short Description: Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225289] Merge Review: at-spi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051921.m15JLDrF004050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225289 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 14:21 EST ------- Only one rpmlint message: at-spi-python.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. I'd split out something into this if possible, but it doesn't look like it. No blockers at all. An exemplary package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:24:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051924.m15JO25H028155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051928.m15JSVVC005064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-05 14:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429451] Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051928.m15JSRMm005024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-05 14:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051928.m15JSfZ1028937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 14:28 EST ------- No response that I've seen from the Packaging Committee. Anyone else hear anythin g off-list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 415791] Review Request: netbsd-iscsi - User-space implementation of iSCSI target from NetBSD project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051929.m15JTLvd028989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netbsd-iscsi - User-space implementation of iSCSI target from NetBSD project Alias: netbsd-iscsi-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=415791 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 19:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802051932.m15JW1G1029656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-05 14:32 EST ------- Not much has changed since previous review, so I'll be brief: clean, simple. source matches upstream, 673d21db31eeaedf9b63cd09f6b247a8 polyester-1.0.3.tar.bz2 scratch build was already pruned, so did a local build, which is rpmlint-clean. All I see: 1. SHOULD: I'd much prefer avoiding the use of Conflicts here. It will only help a rare corner case. I'll leave that to you. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052012.m15KCoMQ005311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 15:12 EST ------- rpmlint on srpm: authd.src:7: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pidentd The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. authd.src:18: W: prereq-use xinetd The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. authd.src: W: no-url-tag The URL tag is missing. These need fixing. rpmlint on rpms: authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here These are OK. authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown. In addition to needing a URL tag, the Source tag needs a url pointing to the upstream tarball. If Fedora or RH are upstream, get a space on hosted. License tag should be GPLv2+. Error in rawhide mock build: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd authd-1.4.3 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + make prefix=/usr gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -W -DNDEBUG -g -O -lcrypto -o in.authd authd.c authd.c: In function 'created_pton_hex': authd.c:198: error: 'struct in6_addr' has no member named 'in6_u' authd.c:202: error: 'struct in6_addr' has no member named 'in6_u' authd.c: In function 'initialize_crypto': authd.c:784: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 4 of 'EVP_BytesToKey' differ in signedness make: *** [in.authd] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.30946 (%build) EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/authd.spec' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 286, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), ret) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/authd.spec' LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED Other than that, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225307] Merge Review: awesfx In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052022.m15KMQBp015696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: awesfx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225307 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-05 15:22 EST ------- Local build fails: + make Making all in awelib make[1]: Entering directory `/var/storage/redhat/BUILD/awesfx-0.5.0d/awelib' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT awe_parm.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/awe_parm.Tpo" -c -o awe_parm.o awe_parm.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/awe_parm.Tpo" ".deps/awe_parm.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/awe_parm.Tpo"; exit 1; fi In file included from awe_parm.c:25: ../include/awe_parm.h:25:29: error: linux/awe_voice.h: No such file or directory In file included from awe_parm.c:25: ../include/awe_parm.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token ../include/awe_parm.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token awe_parm.c:109: error: expected ')' before '*' token awe_parm.c:142: error: expected ')' before '*' token make[1]: *** [awe_parm.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/storage/redhat/BUILD/awesfx-0.5.0d/awelib' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.94791 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052034.m15KYw4W008754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-05 15:34 EST ------- I would have preferred not to be the sole maintainer, but, if you want to I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:43:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052043.m15KhTeD010522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052044.m15KivVl010630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #293957|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:43:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:43:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052043.m15Kh5tC010458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-05 15:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Change the buildroot to > > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root Ahh, ok. Thanks - a new version of the package and spec have been uploaded: Spec URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-5.20080131git.fc8.src.rpm > The part of the guidelines, I wanted you to refer to regarding static libs was, > > "In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless a > compelling reason exists." > > If you do have compelling reasons, it would be good to specify that in the > review. Upstream doesn't build dynamic libraries because the ocfs2-tools api changes quite rapidly as file system features are added / expanded. As a result, it's impossible to provide any sort of abi stability, so static libraries are provided instead. Generally, people writing ocfs2 programs are encouraged to submit their software to ocfs2-tools-devel at oss.oracle.com so that it can be included in the upstream ocfs2-tools distribution. The libraries that are provided in ocfs2-tools-devel are intended for interim development, and for a small number of external programs including some fs test software. > Other than those minor nit-picks, the latest spec looks ok to me. I did > a scratch build of the latest ocfs2 srpm and it builds and installs correctly. Thanks for testing! > A sponsor has to do a official review and approve your spec before you get > commit access. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Ok, I will add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR field to indicate my official request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 20:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:45:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052045.m15KjYlE019748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-05 15:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294042) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294042&action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 21:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052103.m15L3vv0023227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at conversis.de 2008-02-05 16:03 EST ------- There seems to be a problem with one of the included libraries: [root at nexus ~]# bongo-config install IP address to run on [127.0.0.1]: DNS name to use as main hostname: [localhost]: Mail Domains (enter "" to end adding domains): []: ERROR: Couldn't initialise auth subsystem An strace reveals the following reason for the failure: open("/usr/lib/bongo-auth/libauthsqlite3.so", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The directory is missing the needed symlink: [root at nexus bongo-auth]# ls -l libauthsqlite3.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 2008-02-05 17:20 libauthsqlite3.so.0 -> libauthsqlite3.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10612 2008-02-05 17:19 libauthsqlite3.so.0.0.0 After creating the link manually Bongo works as it should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 21:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052112.m15LCthv025117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-05 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > All I see: > > 1. SHOULD: I'd much prefer avoiding the use of Conflicts here. It will only > help a rare corner case. I'll leave that to you. But it won't hurd so I leave it in the spec. > APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 21:15:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052115.m15LF80D025685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-05 16:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polyester3 Short Description: A style for KDE3 Owners: svahl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 21:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430653] Review Request: baracuda - VNC system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052148.m15LmKCG030888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baracuda - VNC system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430653 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-05 16:48 EST ------- Uh, trademarks are not only about identical names, but also about "confusingly similar" names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 21:52:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052152.m15LqVmk023395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 22:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052201.m15M1R60001046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 steved at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From steved at redhat.com 2008-02-05 17:01 EST ------- Add the new Fedora Quota maintainer... Ond?ej Va??k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 22:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052203.m15M32E1025586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-02-05 17:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Color-Library Short Description: Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library Owners: steve Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 22:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430653] Review Request: baracuda - VNC system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052226.m15MQHWv029865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baracuda - VNC system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430653 ------- Additional Comments From seg at haxxed.com 2008-02-05 17:26 EST ------- Unversioned obsoletes are not acceptable. The naming guidelines explain how to handle obsoletes: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-3cfc1ea19d28975faad9d56f70a6ae55661d3c3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 22:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052232.m15MW1sg006770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-05 17:32 EST ------- I have taken care of all my comments (and a bit more). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 22:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052233.m15MXHqL030772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net) | ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-05 17:33 EST ------- Sorry to answer just now but the package has been a little difficult to be "perfect". I've replace the "cp" command by install, I don't know it do it right or not. However, I've a problem yet, the entries "Add KDE menu" and "Restore Applications Menu" in same time in the menu. (I'm not sure is it normal but, putting the KDE menu, it's restore the pirut entry which I've earsed) Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 5 23:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802052334.m15NYVVQ017443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-02-05 18:34 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: hotwire New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 00:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241319] Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060052.m160qkjG023716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hotwire - Interactive hybrid text/graphical shell for developers and system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241319 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-05 19:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 00:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060054.m160sUFV032677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-05 19:54 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 00:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060057.m160vEnI024469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-05 19:57 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 01:43:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060143.m161h8Mx031611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 ------- Additional Comments From matt at rudeserver.com 2008-02-05 20:43 EST ------- Not yet, the build failed due to missing includes for std c libraries. I got the flu before I could fix it, am working on it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 02:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060205.m1625KSn003213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-02-05 21:05 EST ------- 1.2.13 is on the way (tomorrow, I believe). I have many packaging errors, but still I'll push it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 02:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060223.m162NbUA005740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-05 21:23 EST ------- koji says libffi-devel is not found... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 02:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] New: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libffi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libffi-2.1-0.1.20080129svn131943.fc9.src.rpm Description: Compilers for high level languages generate code that follows certain conventions. These conventions are necessary, in part, for separate compilation to work. One such convention is the "calling convention". The "calling convention" is a set of assumptions made by the compiler about where function arguments will be found on entry to a function. A "calling convention" also specifies where the return value for a function is found. Some programs may not know at the time of compilation what arguments are to be passed to a function. For instance, an interpreter may be told at run-time about the number and types of arguments used to call a given function. Libffi can be used in such programs to provide a bridge from the interpreter program to compiled code. The libffi library provides a portable, high level programming interface to various calling conventions. This allows a programmer to call any function specified by a call interface description at run-time. Ffi stands for Foreign Function Interface. A foreign function interface is the popular name for the interface that allows code written in one language to call code written in another language. The libffi library really only provides the lowest, machine dependent layer of a fully featured foreign function interface. A layer must exist above libffi that handles type conversions for values passed between the two languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 02:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:51:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060251.m162pHAq019409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |431098 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 02:51:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060251.m162pGOf019389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431633 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-05 21:51 EST ------- Whoops. I forgot to submit that one first. :) libffi is bugzilla 431633. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 03:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060307.m1637s0a013298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-05 22:07 EST ------- Would you elaborate why you want to ship libffi as a separate package? libffi is part of GCC, is being built when bootstrapping GCC, technically closely tied to GCC ... That said, IMO, libffi should not be shipped separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 03:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060335.m163ZUFA027145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-05 22:35 EST ------- Or, if it is shipped for systems to use, perhaps it should be built from GCC? Note that there is precedence for apps shipping their own libffi in the absence of a system one. See g-wrap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 04:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060416.m164GHAu026265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 geoff at programmer-monk.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(geoff at programmer- | |monk.net) | ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-02-05 23:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > From this comment it seems that finally you have to build > though "strap" stage but you mentioned that you did only by > "quick" stage. I actually build all the way through to "strap" since this is what the dist target of the ant build file does. "Strap" is built just to be sure that "quick" can bootstrap itself. In other words it guarantees that you can replace the bootstrap environment with "quick" and be able to build scala from scratch. I will be uploading a new srpm and spec fixing the emacs issues pointed out by Jonathan in the next couple days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 04:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060458.m164wGIA032734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 05:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:54:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060554.m165sQ1u008946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 00:54 EST ------- SHOULD: 1)Change "%{__install}" to "install" 2)Add doc/out/html/*.html and scripts. But to avoid unnecessary installations of Makefiles in scripts directory, you can add following line to end of %install section rm -f scripts/Makefile* and change %doc to %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING README doc/out/html/*.html scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 06:29:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060629.m166T4kP022667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-02-06 01:29 EST ------- %{_libdir}/bongo-auth/libauthsqlite3.so is in the -devel package like the guidelines demands. It should likely try to open .so.0 Try this: SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo-0.3.1-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo.spec - 5 sec untested patch for the above .so problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 06:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060657.m166vFl1026896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 01:57 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398197 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. f833c873da22fe857d9a5edd3c0e9922 gyachi-1.1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists But -plugins subpackages exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly + GUI app. SHOULD: Remove ExcludeArch line from SPEC. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060822.m168MGBf031843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 03:22 EST ------- Whole license: SISSL source/3rdparty/adoc/ GPL+ -> unused source/3rdparty/fnmatch/ BSD with advertising -> unused source/3rdparty/openssl/ OpenSSL -> unused source/3rdparty/qidl/ copyright only -> unused source/3rdparty/qmake/ GPL+ -> Installed as qmake source/3rdparty/qmake/alloca.c Public Domain? -> unused source/3rdparty/qmake/amiga.c GPLv2+ -> Installed as qmake (and others) ! Note qmake is not linked or used by other parts of gridengine source/3rdparty/qmon/Xbae/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/Xmt310/ BSD source/3rdparty/qmon/iconlist/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/ltree/ LGPL+ source/3rdparty/qmon/spinbox/ MIT source/3rdparty/qmon/tab/ MIT source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ BSD with advertising -> unused source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ma.setp.c MIT -> unused source/3rdparty/sge_depend/ MIT source/3rdparty/snprintf/ the Frontier Artistic License -> unused source/3rdparty/strptime/ BSD with advertising -> unused source/scripts/ldAix MIT -> unused ================================================================================== For -4: * Licensing - Seeing "Multiple Licensing Scenarios" and "Mixed Source Licensing Scenario" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines, I propose the following spec file description. IMO it is better that some file to explain about licensing should be added into %doc (proposal text attached) Then the spec file description regarding to license should be: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: gridengine Version: 6.1u3 Release: 4%{?dist} Summary: Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software ....... Group: Applications/System # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+, which is not used or linked by other parts # of gridengine. License: (BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL) and GPLv2+ ....... ....... %package devel Summary: Gridengine development files Group: Development/Libraries License: BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ....... ....... %files ....... %{_libdir}/libjgdi.so %{_libdir}/libjuti.so # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+ %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/ ....... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- * Services with enabled by default - The two service sgeexecd, sgemaster are enabled by default by only installing rpm packages, which is usually undesirable. See the explanation of $ rpmlint -I service-default-enabled. * %post -p /sbin/ldconfig - When /sbin/ldconfig call is written *in one line* like above, "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig" is automatically added to the corresponding binary rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:31:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060831.m168VBJM000811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060831.m168V25q008837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060851.m168p6Dq004232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 03:51 EST ------- Well, for general packaging guidelines you can refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - First remove non-fedora-related parts/macros and replace them properly. * %mkrel is not defined * MandrivaLinux is not related to us. * Please remove the redundant if "%{_vendor}" != "redhat" &&... check * %{clean_desktop_database} is perhaps not defined. - You don't have to define %version, %release redundantly. - Source must be given with full URL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - "GPL" license tag is invalid for Fedora. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files - When installing desktop files, "desktop-file-install" command must be properly used. - For desktop files, the category "Application" is deprecated and should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:53:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060853.m168r5Bj012565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 03:53 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398193 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2c72f2469ee0413bd470a2ad84f2f0f8 planets-0.1.13.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:55:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060855.m168t0ln004624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 03:55 EST ------- oops missed to modify my review template for scriptlet + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 08:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 03:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060858.m168wqd6005560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nospam at thenerdshow | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 03:58 EST ------- Setting NEEDINFO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 09:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802060948.m169m99k015875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 04:48 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gfeed/gfeed-2.5.0-3.fc8.src.rpm P.S If you have time could you also review taskcoach (#430541)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] New: Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 Summary: Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox-devel-1.7.15-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: FOX is a C++-based library for graphical user interface development FOX supports modern GUI features, such as drag-and-drop, tooltips, tab books, tree lists, icons, multiple document interfaces (MDI), timers, idle processing, automatic GUI updating, as well as OpenGL/Mesa for 3D graphics. Subclassing of basic FOX widgets allows for easy extension beyond the built-in widgets by application writers. The fox-devel package contains the files necessary to develop applications using the FOX GUI toolkit: the header files, the reswrap resource compiler, manual pages, and HTML documentation. I'm not to sure if there should be a separate doc package. I'm also unsure as to whether to create a separate fox package or rename it libfox? Only rpmlint issues. [marc at localhost i386]$ rpmlint fox-devel-1.7.15-1.fc8.i386.rpm fox-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/fox-1.7/html/styles.css fox-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/fox-1.7/html/menu.css fox-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on fox Other packages built contain no rpmlint errors/warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061038.m16AcmUx001236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 05:38 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398563 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5301287f336599ab77ccba4875993734 gfeed-2.5.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:46:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061046.m16AkFaD027784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 05:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfeed Short Description: RSS feed reader Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:43:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431669] New: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431669 Summary: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gtkyahoo/gtkyahoo.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gtkyahoo/gtkyahoo-0.18.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GTKYahoo is a GPL'd GTK+ based yahoo pager client for unix. I wrote this for a couple of reasons - hating windows, wanting to learn GTK+, and because the Java client is highly irritating a nd seems extremely buggy. (I.e. try resizing a chat window). This package doesn't build on x86_64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398592 What should I do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061053.m16ArWfW028941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Summary|Review Request: fox-devel - |Review Request: fox-devel - |A C++ library for GUI |A C++ library for GUI |development |development ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 05:53 EST ------- you better drop -devel in package name and add subpackage -devel like you did for other subpackages -calculator, -pathfinder make fox-devel sub-package own *.h *.so and .pc files and main fox package .so* files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 10:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:58:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431669] Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061058.m16AwEsG005040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431669 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 05:58 EST ------- 1)Change "%{__install}" to "install" 2)drop .a and .la files by adding following line to end of %install find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 11:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061107.m16B7GAM007179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-06 06:07 EST ------- In addition to whar Parag said, I thing that calculator should better be called fox-calculator and pathfinder be called fox-pathfinder (with corresponding modifications in man pages). The names are much too common. There are dots missing at the end of %descriptions. Since they are in te same tarball, adie, pathfinder and so on should have the same version than fox itself. Using specific versions for subpackages will cause much pain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 11:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431669] Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061114.m16BElYZ000542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431669 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 06:14 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gtkyahoo/gtkyahoo.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/gtkyahoo/gtkyahoo-0.18.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 11:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] New: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/scythia/scythia.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/scythia/scythia-0.9.3-2.1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Scythia project is an simple and portable Ftp client. It does not claim to be able to replace the biggest (no SSH etc.), but only to satisfy some persons and to give us a bigger experience in programming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 11:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061157.m16BvTUA007630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox-devel - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-06 06:57 EST ------- Updated. Hopefully it is fine. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox-1.7.15-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:01:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061201.m16C1omB008691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 07:01 EST ------- Can anybody review this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061204.m16C49Es016737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: scythia - |Review Request: scythia - |Just a small ftp client |Just a small ftp client Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061214.m16CEYt8018518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-02-06 07:14 EST ------- I will do it today. The last few days here were Carnival so I took some time off. I intend to publish the formal review still later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061223.m16CNUtu020225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 07:23 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: planets Short Description: A celestial simulator Owners: limb Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:32:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061232.m16CWwNa013869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsafrane at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 07:32 EST ------- Adding authd maintainer listed in pkgdb to cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 12:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061236.m16CavGS014660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 07:36 EST ------- 1)license is GPLv3+ 2)can it be possible to add GenericName and comment for french also in .desktop like you did for pl_PL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061306.m16D6WeQ027919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 08:06 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/scythia/scythia.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/scythia/scythia-0.9.3-2.2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061317.m16DH1Im029730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 08:17 EST ------- First of all, rebuild doesn't succeed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398683 You can check this by koji scratch build. >From just glancing at your spec file: - Source must be given with full URL - Fedora specific compilation flags don't seem to be honored correctly. - Would you try to use relative symlink instead of absolute one? - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. - It seems "Requires: gimp" is needed because `gimptool --gimpdatadir` is owned by gimp but not by gimp-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061320.m16DKdAL030257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com 2008-02-06 08:20 EST ------- I will revies this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061332.m16DWhM1024957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 08:32 EST ------- GCC doesn't include a copy of libffi. See Bugzilla 190735 where Jakub explicitly says "I think libffi should be just packaged separately from gcc for third party package use. Either package it in Fedora Extras, or convince somebody to do so." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:40:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061340.m16DeGH3026492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 ------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com 2008-02-06 08:40 EST ------- Source: should be http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pygtk/2.12/pygtk-%{version}.tar.bz2 to make it easier to see where the upstream source comes from. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061356.m16Du8Ue029460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 cooly at mips.edu.ms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 13:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] New: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at mips.edu.ms QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mips.edu.ms/rspam.spec SRPM URL: http://mips.edu.ms/rspam-0.0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Rspam Evolution Plugin enables Evolution Mail client to report email messages as spam to checksum-based and statistical filtering networks. It supports Razor network, DCC, SpamCop and Pyzor. This is one of my first packages and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 14:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061406.m16E6poH031992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fox-devel - |Review Request: fox - A C++ |A C++ library for GUI |library for GUI development |development | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 14:05:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:05:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061405.m16E52Wt031700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 ------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com 2008-02-06 09:05 EST ------- MUST: * Package is matching naming guidelines. * spec file in named %{name}.spec * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible have the right good license shortname : LGPLv2+ * License file must be in %doc (it it exists) * Spec file is written in American English * Spec file is legible. * Sources match upstream. MD5SUM: a816346d750d61e3fa67a200e4292694 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pygtk/2.12/pygtk-2.12.1.tar.bz2 a816346d750d61e3fa67a200e4292694 pygtk-2.12.1.tar.bz2 * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager/Vendor/Distribution/Copyright tags not used * Summary tag does not end in a period * Package compiles and build into RPM's on : i386 etc. * no Exclude Arch * BuildRequires for all build requerements (- the ones on the Exception list) * no locales * no shared libs * Package own all created directories. * No duplicate files in %files * Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line * Package has a %clean with a rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * consistently use of macros * Package contains code or or permissable content. * Large documentation files goes into -doc subpackage. * files in %doc dont affect runtime. * header files goes into -devel subpackage * no static libs * package has pkgconfig (.pc) files and has a 'Requires: pkgconfig' * -devel subpackage has a 'Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}' * *.la libtool archives are removed in spec (if available) * not a gui application * package don't own files and dirs owned by other packages. * %install starts with an rm -rf %{buildroot} * rpm package filenames is in valid UTF-8. * no Rpath * no config files * no init scripts * no %makeinstall used * no Requires(pre,post) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 14:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061422.m16EMU8K002536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 (stalled) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com 2008-02-06 09:22 EST ------- rpmlint output: $ rpmlint pygtk2-2.12.1-3.fc9.i386.rpm pygtk2.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/pygtk-demo/pygtk-demo.in "@PYTHON@" pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/stock_browser.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/dnd.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/ui_manager.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/statusicon.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/images.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/buttonbox.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/sizegroup.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/hypertext.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/list_store.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/changedisplay.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/textview.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/dialogs.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/menu.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/pygtk-demo.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/tree_store.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/panes.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/expander.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/pixbufs.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/appwindow.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/editable_cells.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/colorsel.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/NEWS pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/entry_completion.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pygtk/2.0/demos/treemodel.py 0644 pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/ide/browse.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/ide/gtkcons.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/ide/gtkdb.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/ide/gtkprof.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/ide/pyide.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/simple/hello.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/simple/scribble.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/simple/simple.py /usr/bin/env pygtk2.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/pygtk2-2.12.1/examples/simple/tooltip.py /usr/bin/env $ rpmlint pygtk2-devel-2.12.1-3.fc9.i386.rpm pygtk2-devel.i386: W: no-documentation $ rpmlint pygtk2-libglade-2.12.1-3.fc9.i386.rpm pygtk2-libglade.i386: W: no-documentation $ rpmlint pygtk2-doc-2.12.1-3.fc9.i386.rpm $ rpmlint pygtk2-2.12.1-3.fc9.src.rpm nothing dangerous in these messages, i think they can be ignored. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 14:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061438.m16EcUrV012406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 14:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:37:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061437.m16EbtWS012330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at mips.edu.ms 2008-02-06 09:37 EST ------- > > * Would you explain why this package should have > > "Requies: firefox"? > > Actually that is firefox-devel > > > Requires: firefox-devel > > Application requires gtkmozembed that is actually packed in firefox-devel. > Initially I thought I could provide two different packages gtkmozembed and > nogtkmozembed, but finally this could get confusing so I rather pack it using > gtkmozembed and the user can choose the renderer. That's why firefox-devel is > required. I moved firefox-devel to: BuildRequires: firefox-devel rpmbuild will check the dependency for libraries and will add the dependency which should pull libgtkembedmoz correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:02:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061502.m16F28uc016959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061511.m16FBWrD012001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-06 10:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gyachi Short Description: A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support Owners: sundaram ghosler Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes Note on this CVS request. Gregory Hosler is the primary upstream developer and I would like to have his as the co-maintainer of this package. I am not sure how to deal with the sponsorship process in this case. Any guidance on this would be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] New: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/libdstr/libdstr.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/libdstr/libdstr-20080124-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: libdstr is a library containing Dstr, Dave's String class. Koji rebuild results: For dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=399004 For dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398997 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061516.m16FGeSX020340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-06 10:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > GCC doesn't include a copy of libffi. The sources are part of GCC. C.f. your spec file were you explicitly lift them from there. > See Bugzilla 190735 where Jakub explicitly > says "I think libffi should be just packaged separately from gcc for third > party package use. "He thinks ... should" ... In other words, _He_ doesn't package it, because _He_ and upstream-GCC doesn't want to. (And there are good reasons not to do so.) > Either package it in Fedora Extras, or convince somebody to do so. Or do not package it at all. Trying to lift the code from GCC's source-tree and to package it separately to me is nothing bug silly. Sorry, I am sure you will not like this, but this had to be said. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:24:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061524.m16FOXZl021595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 10:24 EST ------- One of my pending applications (gambas2) needs it. g-wrap needs it. That in and of itself says that there is a need for this library to be packaged system-wide, rather than buried in multiple copies of individual packages. The security concerns around that are enough reason to separate it. I would prefer to see this generated out of GCC, but barring that, I'll maintain it myself. It builds fine (and works fine) as a standalone library. Also, I think you're misinterpreting what Jakub said. He said that he believes that libffi should be packaged separately from gcc for other packages to use, which is precisely what I'm doing here. I'm adding Jakub to the CC on this bug, so that he can either confirm or deny this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061539.m16FdS7f017279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 10:39 EST ------- rpmlint on srpm: binutils.src:20: W: prereq-use /sbin/install-info The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. Fix. binutils.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnupro The specfile contains an unversioned Obsoletes: token, which will match all older, equal and newer versions of the obsoleted thing. This may cause update problems, restrict future package/provides naming, and may match something it was originally not inteded to match -- make the Obsoletes versioned if possible. Fix if possible. binutils.src:47: W: prereq-use /sbin/install-info The use of PreReq is deprecated. In the majority of cases, a plain Requires is enough and the right thing to do. Sometimes Requires(pre), Requires(post), Requires(preun) and/or Requires(postun) can also be used instead of PreReq. binutils.src:303: W: macro-in-%changelog _prefix Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. binutils.src:745: W: macro-in-%changelog _prefix Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Fix. binutils.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch4: binutils-2.18.50.0.3-ia64-lib64.p atch A patch is applied inside an %ifarch block. Patches must be applied on all architectures and may contain necessary configure and/or code patch to be effective only on a given arch. Not a problem. binutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GNU collection of binary utilities. Summary ends with a dot. Fix. rpmlint on rpms is clean other than the above. Why are the .a files not in a -static package? What would be the ramifications of correcting this? Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 15:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061547.m16Fl61n019057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-06 10:47 EST ------- [root at kwizatz push]# libst-config --libs -lvorbisenc -lvorbisfile -logg -lasound -lm -lgsm but sox-devel doesn't BR gsm-devel alsa-lib-devel and libvorbis-devel also I have this: cc -shared -o ../libmltsox.so factory.o filter_sox.o -lst `libst-config --libs` -L../../framework -lmlt /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgsm collect2: ld returned 1 exit status since libst-config is missing -L/usr/lib64 or x86_64, so it might need to move to pkgconfig instead. for now I might use a workaround, but it would be fine to have this fixed for F-9 I wonder if it would be valuable to have modular built for libs (then BR libtool-ltdl-devel ), I'm testing this also... License need to be updated sox 14.0.1 is available static lib should be removed and .la file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:00:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:00:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061600.m16G0Gpv021935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 11:00 EST ------- Good for me. I will leave the final judgment to Ian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061611.m16GBQbB024890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-06 11:11 EST ------- Shouldn't every non-versioned .so library land in -devel? Ie. %{_libdir}/libupstart.so And, other, %find_lang should be probably used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061617.m16GH4oT000321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-06 11:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Also, I think you're misinterpreting what Jakub said. He said that he believes > that libffi should be packaged separately from gcc for other packages to use, > which is precisely what I'm doing here. I'm adding Jakub to the CC on this bug, > so that he can either confirm or deny this. :) And I disagree with you both. I say: libffi's sources are part of GCC. i.e. if at all, it must be shipped as a subpackage of GCC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061627.m16GRX9m002561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-06 11:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > Shouldn't every non-versioned .so library land in -devel? > > Ie. %{_libdir}/libupstart.so > > And, other, %find_lang should be probably used. Are you looking at the latest package? Your concerns seem out of date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] New: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mpg at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-toolkit.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-toolkit-0.79.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Sugar is the core of the OLPC Human Interface. The toolkit provides a set of widgets to build HIG compliant applications and interfaces to interact with system services like presence and the datastore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061637.m16GbAF4004530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 11:37 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3a35a29f33b22c04fe3d2ebe5dc29b5f libdstr-20080124.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libdstr-20080124-1.fc9 -> Provides: libdstr.so.2Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdstr.so.2 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 -> Requires: libdstr.so.2 Not sure why Requires for libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 is missing libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9 But when I did "rpmbuild -ba libdstr.spec" on my machine I see its showing that requires on main package. Am I missing something to look? Note:- I used build.log from your F9 scratch build for this review. But for F8 build I can see that Requires is present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061639.m16Gdm7O029987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 11:39 EST ------- I'm not sure if this is approved or not. Whoever did the review should mark the flag appropriately. If you still need a sponsor after that (you shouldn't, as both notting and tibbs can sponsor you), I'd be willing to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061639.m16Gdwqg005035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061648.m16GmvKW006785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 11:48 EST ------- is this built for EL-5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225616] Merge Review: bison In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061648.m16GmVQ9006723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bison https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225616 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 11:48 EST ------- rpmlint on srpm: bison.src:148: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. bison.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GNU general-purpose parser generator. Summary ends with a dot. Fix. rpmlint on rpms: bison.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/bison/yacc.c A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. bison.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/bison/glr.c A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. bison-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. bison-runtime.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix or explain in spec. Is the .a necessary, and if so, why in -devel, not in -static? Otherwise, looks great, no other blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 16:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061659.m16GxDdg002250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 11:59 EST ------- Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine, when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: libdstr.so.2 Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- But ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9 libdstr.so.2 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version. Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat? Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against "rpm"??) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061704.m16H435c010442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sereinity at online.f| |r) | ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-06 12:04 EST ------- All was fixed : http://sereinity.free.fr/fedora/cairo-clock-0.3.3-3.fc8.src.rpm http://sereinity.free.fr/fedora/cairo-clock.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061704.m16H4klt003831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-02-06 12:04 EST ------- The package fails to build in rawhide due to the egg-info file not being declared in %files. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PythonEggs for further details. The fix is easy. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:06:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:06:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061706.m16H6TBj011276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 12:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine, > when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > Requires: libdstr.so.2 > Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > But > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires > ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm > libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9 > libdstr.so.2 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version. > Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat? > Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against > "rpm"??) looks like that. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061710.m16HAoDa005366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 12:10 EST ------- Thanks!! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libdstr Short Description: Dave's String class Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225619] Merge Review: bluez-hcidump In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061719.m16HJw4m013467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bluez-hcidump https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225619 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 12:19 EST ------- all rpmlint clean, save: bluez-hcidump.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/bluez-hcidump-1.40/NEWS Not a problem. Could drop that file. Source tag should be like: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Either way, though, the upstream is 404. Might be a problem on upstream's end. Otherwise, looks good, no other blockers. Any ETA on upgrading to 1.41? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061723.m16HN2of007355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine, > > when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 > > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > Requires: libdstr.so.2 > > Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > But > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [tasaka1 at localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires > > ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm > > libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9 > > libdstr.so.2 > > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version. > > Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat? > > Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against > > "rpm"??) > > looks like that. Filed as bug 431721 as not only libdstr seems affected. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398488 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398489 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061728.m16HSGBH015147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061732.m16HWhxk015924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 12:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061734.m16HYbIN009246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 12:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225626] Merge Review: brltty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061737.m16HbvSY016713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: brltty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 12:37 EST ------- Local build errors: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/brltty-3.9-InstallRoot error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/brlapi-0.5.1/libbrlapi_tcl.so /usr/lib/brlapi-0.5.1/pkgIndex.tcl RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/brltty-3.9-InstallRoot/usr/lib/tcl8.4/brlapi-0.5.1/libbrlapi_tcl.so File not found: /var/tmp/brltty-3.9-InstallRoot/usr/lib/tcl8.4/brlapi-0.5.1/pkgIndex.tcl File not found: /var/tmp/brltty-3.9-InstallRoot/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Brlapi-0.5.1-py2.5.egg-info Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/brlapi-0.5.1/libbrlapi_tcl.so /usr/lib/brlapi-0.5.1/pkgIndex.tcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 17:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:39:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061739.m16HdDIe010040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 18:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431414] Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061824.m16IOtsY025109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: planets - A celestial simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431414 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-06 13:24 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 18:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431692] Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061847.m16IlMnW029618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 13:47 EST ------- Rebuilt on all archs, thank you for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 18:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061850.m16IobJZ023375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-06 13:50 EST ------- everything's good as far as i can see. === approved === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 18:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061853.m16Irgvc023824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-06 13:53 EST ------- The SRPM link should be http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/libgringotts/libgringotts-latest.src.rpm The URL in the spec doesn't actually mention libgringotts, so I'm sure you can understand my confusion. I found it on the download page, though, which indicates that 1.2.1 is the latest version. The only rpmlint issue now is: libgringotts.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long ensure the data are as safe as possible, and allow the user to have the complete which you can easily fix up by reflowing the text. Everything else looks good; just fix up that description line when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429451] Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061925.m16JP6RB029678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: magicmaze - Board game featuring a maze which the players change each turn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429451 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-06 14:25 EST ------- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061935.m16JZagu031429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |green at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 14:35 EST ------- Paging Anthony Green (upstream maintainer) to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061950.m16JoXg9001787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-06 14:50 EST ------- I don't believe this should have been closed. Nobody has approved it yet, and I believe that the current package has outstanding issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225778] Merge Review: gcc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061950.m16Jocwf001924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gcc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225778 Bug 225778 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248363] Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061950.m16JobXp001893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide Bug 248363 depends on bug 225809, which changed state. Bug 225809 Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061953.m16JrKRL008711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-06 14:53 EST ------- libffi should be packaged separately from GCC, much like zlib is. (zlib is bundled with the GCC sources, just like libffi). I'm preparing a libffi 3.0 release right now, and would prefer that we ship this version instead if that's OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061954.m16JsGmZ002463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-06 14:54 EST ------- 1: O, yes, I made little typo, sorry. 2: Again too long... I've tested it and it's ok: quiet for me (SPEC, SRPM, RPM). Should I fix it indeed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 19:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802061957.m16JvBmj009414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 14:57 EST ------- This works for me. Please note that the headers (at least in what was in SVN) aren't anywhere near multilib clean, and I conditionalized them with a dummy header in my package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 20:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062003.m16K3HEm004595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:03 EST ------- SRPM: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/libgringotts/libgringotts-latest.src.rpm SPEC: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/libgringotts/libgringotts.spec PS: Type APPROVED again and we're done (; . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 20:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062019.m16KJtap007875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-06 15:19 EST ------- It's already approved; please go ahead and make your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 20:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:26:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062026.m16KQKFI015751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-06 15:26 EST ------- OK, approving and sponsoring; please enter CVS request. I'd like to co-maintain it for the moment, if you don't mind. For builds, please build into dist-f9-upstart until we get some of the bugs on the tracker worked out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 20:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062028.m16KSeIi016016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 jakub.rusinek at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgringotts Short Description: A backend for managing encrypted data files on the disk Owners: liviopl Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: liviopl Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 20:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062033.m16KXDcF010592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-06 15:33 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach-0.68.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 21:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062102.m16L2PJG016515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 21:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062142.m16LgbMg024547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Summary|Merge Review: pygtk2 |Merge Review: pygtk2 |(stalled) | ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-02-06 16:42 EST ------- Thanks Tim, fixed the Source tag in pygtk2-2.12.1-4.fc9. I'll wait to push a new package until I have a more significant update. Setting status to MODIFIED, please close the bug if you're satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 21:40:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:40:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062140.m16LeQpY031366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-06 16:40 EST ------- Patrice - Thanks for all your hard work here! I've applied the patches. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ncl-5.0.0-8.fc8.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ncl.spec * Wed Feb 6 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 5.0.0-8 - Move examples into separate sub-package * Fri Feb 1 2008 - Patrice Dumas - 5.0.0-7 - put noarch files in datadir - avoid compilation in %%install * Mon Jan 14 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 5.0.0-6 - Make BR hdf-devel >= 4.2r2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 21:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062145.m16LjaQG032277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-02-06 16:45 EST ------- We are currently working on the next version of this package, I will post a new spec file when it is finished and I am sure it builds on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 21:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062153.m16Lrwj9001335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-06 16:53 EST ------- Imported and built for devel, F-8 and EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062205.m16M5VFB029794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-06 17:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > This works for me. Please note that the headers (at least in what was in SVN) > aren't anywhere near multilib clean, and I conditionalized them with a dummy > header in my package. Yes, that's one of the things we're cleaning up for 3.0. It probably won't be ready for a couple of weeks at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:08:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062208.m16M8kQ5030157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-06 17:08 EST ------- Um, this should be a noarch package: BuildArch: noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062218.m16MIdLo031650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-02-06 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Um, this should be a noarch package: > > BuildArch: noarch > Unfortunately, I don't think it can be a noarch package, because most of its dependencies are arch specific packages (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin). How would that work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062241.m16MfojF003129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-06 17:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Unfortunately, I don't think it can be a noarch package, because most of its > dependencies are arch specific packages (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin). How > would that work? We don't care about the architecture of dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062253.m16MrxZJ011790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-06 17:53 EST ------- I think it would be better to change the perl substitution to a sed substitution. the gzipping of info files will be done automatically, and install-info knows how to install/remove compressed info files. I suggest using %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) Why not use %configure and why use %makeinstall? Looks like DESTDIR is rightly used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 22:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062254.m16MsbdN011832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-02-06 17:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Unfortunately, I don't think it can be a noarch package, because most of its > > dependencies are arch specific packages (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin). How > > would that work? > > We don't care about the architecture of dependencies. So if I do yum install fedora-ds on an x86_64 system, what happens? Does it pull in fedora-ds-base.x86_64 or fedora-ds-base.i386? If the latter, and I really want (and expect since I'm running on an x86_64 system) to get fedora-ds-base.x86_64 picked up as a dependency, how does that work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 6 23:03:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802062303.m16N34EL013726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-06 18:03 EST ------- Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries taking precedence. Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only get the preferred architecture. Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway? Is there any reason why you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 00:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070003.m1703vr8023143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 matt at rudeserver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 00:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070014.m170EGRN018775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-06 19:14 EST ------- Sorry for neglecting this review too long... (In reply to comment #11) > Nevertheless, it seem that ghc-X11-extras is not needed anymore, at least the > latest release of xmonad does not need it, but a newer version of "ghc-X11", > but I need to do some more research here Right I just noticed this myself. I didn't search the haskell mailing-lists but I see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464004 I think it would be good and straightforward to update your package to X11 instead since ghc-6.8.2 no longer seems to ship X11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 00:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225732] Merge Review: epiphany In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070046.m170kU0t029674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: epiphany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225732 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-02-06 19:46 EST ------- I've done the remaining cosmetic chances, so the package is ready for approval, methinks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 00:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225732] Merge Review: epiphany In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070050.m170o6ID024164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: epiphany https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225732 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070116.m171GnIk002064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 cjdahlin at ncsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-06 20:16 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: upstart Short Description: An event-driven init system Owners: sadmac,notting Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422851] Review Request: fuse-gmailfs- Gmail Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070148.m171mvO8006700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-gmailfs- Gmail Filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422851 Bug 422851 depends on bug 422831, which changed state. Bug 422831 Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070148.m171mv3D006672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 Bug 422841 depends on bug 422831, which changed state. Bug 422831 Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422831] Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070148.m171muZf006648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 20:48 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431032] Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070151.m171pXCT001294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghost-diagrams - A program that generates patterns from tiles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431032 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 20:51 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431047] Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070152.m171qNeF007490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: latencytop - System latency monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431047 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 20:52 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 01:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070151.m171pi8T007412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 20:51 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070202.m1722tgA003343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 21:02 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422851] Review Request: fuse-gmailfs- Gmail Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070204.m17243Qx003503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-gmailfs- Gmail Filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422851 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 21:04 EST ------- Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested branches on build server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431371] Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070208.m1728I7x010194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gyachi - A Yahoo! chat client with Webcam and voice support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431371 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070232.m172WCLK008049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 21:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070235.m172ZxVq008773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-06 21:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 02:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070248.m172mg8O010503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-02-06 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries > taking precedence. Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only > get the preferred architecture. Ok. I guess at that point I can then make fedora-ds noarch? > Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway? Is there any reason why > you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64? Is it multilib? What makes it multilib? I don't think there is any reason to run the 32-bit version on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 03:16:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:16:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070316.m173GB7s021606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-06 22:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested > branches on build server. I am closing review requests when packages have been pushed to the repos. So far, for reasons incomprehensible to me, this hasn't happened yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 03:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070332.m173Wru1024280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 22:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Closing this as this package has been successfully built for all requested > > branches on build server. > I am closing review requests when packages have been pushed to the repos. > > So far, for reasons incomprehensible to me, this hasn't happened yet. > and I just only followed whats written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess Step 13: Close the bugzilla ticket (assuming that the package built successfully) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 03:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070346.m173k3Q7021163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-06 22:46 EST ------- I got confused here. When I look for this package in bodhi, I got this link https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-1420 This shows that this package pushed to stable repo on 5th Feb 2008 Release: Fedora 8 Update ID: FEDORA-2008-1420 Status: stable Type: enhancement Karma: 0 Pushed: True Date Pushed: 2008-02-05 23:18:14 Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2008-02-02 15:55:34 Close bugs: True But I can't see that here http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/i386/ But I can see SRPM at http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 03:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070355.m173txO0023065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2008-02-06 22:55 EST ------- Just a quick check-in ping. :-) Can we move the process forward somehow? (Are you waiting on something from me?) Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 04:03:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070403.m1743vNU024818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-06 23:03 EST ------- Sorry, I never saw the sponsor request come through. You're sponsored now, and have cvsextras approval. Follow the next steps on the Join link I pasted above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 04:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 23:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070409.m17490Wk025698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-06 23:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I got confused here. When I look for this package in bodhi, I got this link > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-1420 Exactly. I requested this package to be pushed Feb 02, rel-rel claimed to have done so Feb 05, today it's Feb. 07 and nothing has happened :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 05:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070503.m1753HmM002515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-02-07 00:03 EST ------- Ping? Is this review APPROVED? It seems to have stalled, although most of the serious issues seem to have been fixed. Still quite a number of broken packages in rawhide that need libsoup22 ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 05:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070527.m175Rq84012191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 cjdahlin at ncsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070600.m1760NFp012051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From rtlm10 at gmail.com 2008-02-07 01:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294188&action=view) rpmlint output for screenlets-0.0.12-2.fc8.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:01:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070601.m1761F7Q017274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 rtlm10 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rtlm10 at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rtlm10 at gmail.com 2008-02-07 01:01 EST ------- Attaching rpmlint output from the screenlets-0.0.12-2.fc8.src.rpm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070605.m1765Kgd018191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: publican - |documentation-devil - |publication tool chain |Documentation tool chain | ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-07 01:05 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-0.27-0.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican.spec * Thu Feb 07 2008 Jeff Fearn 0.27-0 - Use docbook-style-xsl - Update custom xsl to use docbook-xsl-1.73.2 - Remove CATALOGS override - Remove Red Hat specific clause from Makefile.common - Fixed inavlid xhtml BZ 428931 - Update License to GPL2 - Add GPL2 Header to numerous files - renamed from documentation-devil to publican Bumped the version due to code changes. I'm pretty sure I didn't miss anything :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070610.m176Asm9013990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-07 01:10 EST ------- new packages, should fix tty issue as well as add license: Spec: http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/event-compat-sysv.spec SRPM: http://www4.ncsu.edu/~cjdahlin/event-compat-sysv-0.3.9-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430339] Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070612.m176CaZM019275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgringotts - The libgringotts provides a backend for managing the data files on the disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430339 jakub.rusinek at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070624.m176OHBp020900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 01:24 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=400409 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 2286269b90c84f52463580a271f608b5 scythia_0.9.3-2-src.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070635.m176ZOBj022783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: publican- |documentation-devel-Fedora -|fedora - Fedora Publishing |Fedora Theme |Theme ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-07 01:35 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-fedora-0.6-0.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-fedora.spec Updated for renamed master package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 06:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] New: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable-0.4.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Free Thai scalable fonts: - Kinnari, Garuda and Norasi from the National Font project - DB Thai Text from DearBook - TlwgMono, PseudoMono, Purisa by TLWG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 07:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070724.m177O9wi030634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 02:24 EST ------- I submitted thaifonts-scalable, cleaned up from Behdad's packaging, under bug 431829. Hope that is ok, otherwise we can also continue the review here. Just felt it was easier to start with a fresh ticket with a new submitter. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 07:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070725.m177P4jP031052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |431829 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 07:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070725.m177P3hB031024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |225356 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 08:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070802.m17821HO004046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-07 03:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > libffi should be packaged separately from GCC, much like zlib is. (zlib is > bundled with the GCC sources, just like libffi). Unlike zlib, the upstream for libffi is in GCC - Otherwise Spot would not have to lift the code from GCC's code base. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 08:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 03:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070804.m1784pR0031110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 03:04 EST ------- build failed with log --------------------------------------------------------- checking for mkfontscale... no checking for ttmkfdir... no configure: error: You need mkfontscale or ttmkfdir error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8187 (%build) ---------------------------------------------------------- look like missing BR: ttmkfdir xorg-x11-font-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 09:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070917.m179HFpV016654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2008-02-07 04:17 EST ------- You are right, it should be open. I will go through it now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 09:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226333] Merge Review: pygtk2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070923.m179NND3017651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pygtk2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226333 tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tim.lauridsen at googlemail.com 2008-02-07 04:23 EST ------- Fine with me closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 09:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431534] Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070926.m179Q8Tl013160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gfeed - RSS feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431534 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-07 04:26 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 09:27:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070927.m179RWcl018618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-07 04:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scythia Short Description: Just a small ftp client Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 09:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802070956.m179uvR8018521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2008-02-07 04:56 EST ------- Hi Nicolas, what version are you talking about? The latest version in F9 uses pkgconfig and BR contains gsm-devel alsa-lib-devel and libvorbis-devel. Thank you, Jirka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 10:00:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071000.m17A0W4n024390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-02-07 05:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294196) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294196&action=view) patch to spec file The egg-info file name is different. :-) The patch attached has three changes: Fixes the egg-info location. Excludes the buildlib directory that seems to be used only at build time. Reorders the file section (it is a matter of style) to put similar items together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 10:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071012.m17AClhG021667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-07 05:12 EST ------- Source RPM: publican.src: W: invalid-license GPL2 In the source I see that GPLv2+ (all the /bin/*), GPL and GFDL are all mentioned. In the same line, since you are upstream, could you please include the license file(s) in the source ? Desktop file: vendor should be fedora. Also, I think it is not really nice to dynamically create the desktop file, but that may be just me too picky. There is no downloadable source. Any chance of having a full URL in the Source tag ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 10:41:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:41:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071041.m17AfVcq006981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 05:41 EST ------- 1)Good if you will split BR lines to 80 chars say 2)Missing Requires: pkgconfig on -devel package. 3) missing Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} on -adie, -calculator, -pathfinder, -shutterbug packages. 4) fox library used license LGPLv3+ and other subpackages are using GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 10:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071050.m17Aoaqb008528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 kvolny at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-02-07 05:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vodovod Short Description: a pipe connecting game Owners: kvolny Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 10:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071053.m17ArAwr028711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 05:53 EST ------- why directory name contains bug string attached to packages's nvr? /usr/share/waf-1.3.1-f157e378df1863aafcd40df84118156b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 11:12:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071112.m17BCbSE012326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-07 06:12 EST ------- Fixed. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/fox-devel/fox-1.7.15-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 11:39:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431669] Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071139.m17BdHiT004590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431669 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 06:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This package doesn't build on x86_64. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398592 > > What should I do? Can you ask upstream to look at this issue and release patch or new tarball that resolves this compilation issue on 64 bit architecture? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 11:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071139.m17BdwX6016668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-07 06:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Unlike zlib, the upstream for libffi is in GCC - Otherwise Spot would not have > to lift the code from GCC's code base. It's true that for the past 10 years virtually all development has happened within the GCC project. However, the FSF has always been clear that libffi is not part of GCC. It is just distributed along with GCC for convenience. GCC has never installed libffi as a user library. It is only used to enable libgcj. Given libffi's continued use outside of the GCC project, I recently decided to start making independent libffi releases again. See this thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2008/msg00000.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 12:05:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071205.m17C5inf009610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-07 07:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Unlike zlib, the upstream for libffi is in GCC - Otherwise Spot would not have > > to lift the code from GCC's code base. > > It's true that for the past 10 years virtually all development has happened > within the GCC project. However, the FSF has always been clear that libffi is > not part of GCC. Can you provide any evidence for this statement? Being a GCC developer myself I have never heard about any such statement, I knew there had your libffi project before, .. it had been absorbed by GCC like many other comparable projects, causing its former upstream to die. > It is just distributed along with GCC for convenience. GCC > has never installed libffi as a user library. A fact which could easily be changed. > It is only used to enable libgcj. Check libffi's ChangeLog and you will probably noticed that I know about this. It's one reason why I think applications still using libffi outside of GCC probably had been based on your ancient libffi-1.2 or have lifted the code from GCC. > Given libffi's continued use outside of the GCC project, I recently decided to > start making independent libffi releases again. See this thread: > http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2008/msg00000.html Of cause it's your liberty to resume the work you abandoned many years ago and to launch a fork based on GCC's source. I wonder if GCC-SC knows about your decision and what they think about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 12:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071218.m17CIsxY011537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2008-02-07 07:18 EST ------- Could anybody grab this review and write the list of "should be fixed" things here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 12:41:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071241.m17CfAac027383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-07 07:41 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach-0.68.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 12:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071253.m17CrEbX017412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 jamatos at fc.up.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-02-07 07:53 EST ------- One final note, as I have found out while trying this package in rawhide, you need to add a Requires wxPython because that is not caught in the automatic dependencies. :-( It would be nice to have automatic python dependencies like there are for dynamic libraries or perl modules. We can dream. :-) There are no additional requirements to this package so it is APPROVED. You can fix the above problem when importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 13:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071304.m17D4Msv031360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-07 08:04 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/taskcoach/taskcoach-0.68.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 13:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071305.m17D5PkR031887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-07 08:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: taskcoach Short Description: Your friendly task manager Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 13:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071313.m17DD4KN000618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-07 08:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I think it would be better to change the perl substitution > to a sed substitution. I concur. > the gzipping of info files will be done automatically, > and install-info knows how to install/remove compressed info files. Cool, I didn't know that. > I suggest using > %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) What would the advantage be? Just curious. > Why not use %configure and why use %makeinstall? Looks like > DESTDIR is rightly used. Have the concerns from the changelog on line 885 been addressed? I've never had a problem with %configure myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 13:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071340.m17De6iE026007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 08:40 EST ------- Requires(post): coreutils Requires(postun): coreutils are not needed. Minor: "-n %{name}-%{version}" is superfluous for %setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] New: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jorton at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: pakchois is just another PKCS#11 wrapper library. pakchois aims to provide a thin wrapper over the PKCS#11 interface; offering a modern object-oriented C interface which does not hide any of the underlying interface, and avoids dependencies on any cryptography toolkit. This library will be used by the next version of neon to provide smartcard support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:14:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071414.m17EEAXq011614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-02-07 09:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > However, I've a problem yet, the entries "Add KDE menu" and "Restore > Applications Menu" in same time in the menu. There would only be one of them at a time if you had not renamed gnome-menu-extended.desktop as fedora-gnome-menu-extended.desktop. This is how it works upstream. A user first only sees "Add KDE menu" from /usr/share/applications/gnome-menu-extended.desktop. Then when the user adds the KDE submenu, gnome-menu-extended.sh will copy /usr/share/gnome-menu-extended/gnome-menu-restore.desktop into ~/.local/share/applications, renamed as gnome-menu-extended.desktop. A desktop file in ~/.local/share/applications will hide a desktop file of the same name in /usr/share/applications so the user will now see "Restore Applications Menu" instead of "Add KDE menu". If you rename the file in /usr/share/applications then the file copied into ~/.local/share/applications will no longer hide it, so you will see both "Add KDE menu" and "Restore Applications Menu". Solution: do not rename gnome-menu-extended.desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:22:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071422.m17EM507001977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 09:22 EST ------- Sorry about that. Should be fixed with with: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/thaifonts-scalable/thaifonts-scalable-0.4.9-2.fc8.src.rpm BTW please ignore the dist tag of the srpm. The current package requires the fontforge in rawhide to build. For F8 we probably need to ship a slightly older release for it to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071423.m17EN3wp013351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |333371 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:32:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071432.m17EWmRb003687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 ------- Additional Comments From tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net 2008-02-07 09:32 EST ------- rpmlint is silent. The checkout instructions contain a typo: - # cd sugartoolkit + # cd sugar-toolkit The checkout instructions doesn't tell how to create the tarball contained in the SRPM. Source0 doesn't point to an existing tarball. The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071433.m17EXWln003809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071442.m17EgfFq005764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-07 09:42 EST ------- rpmlint says: gmp.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL gmp.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libgmpxx.so.4.0.2 /lib/libm.so.6 IMO the License tag should be "LGPL2+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 14:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:53:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071453.m17ErPiB018933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 09:53 EST ------- Thanks for the updated package, Jeff. Yes, thanks Manuel, the license points and source url certainly need to be addressed. Some more remarks: The documentation under %_docdir is about 1.2MB in size, so I think it must be moved to a separate subpackage, say publican-docs, along with the desktop file. Also BTW in F9 the default desktop font is changing from dejavu-lgc-fonts to dejavu-fonts (a superset of dejuvu-lgc-fonts with wider language coverage). It would probably be good to tag /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/common/*-* with %lang tags too. (Now that the new project name has been settled, I think it would be worth renaming the project on fedorahosted.org to publican too to be consistent.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071508.m17F8vSR011102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-07 10:08 EST ------- Split out the static libs from *-devel into a *-static package or (if appropriate) abandon shipping them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071526.m17FQUtG014896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 10:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > The documentation under %_docdir is about 1.2MB in size, so I think it must > be moved to a separate subpackage, say publican-docs, along with the desktop > file. Sorry doc subpackage should be named publican-doc (according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226029] Merge Review: libidn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071533.m17FXPd7016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libidn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226029 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-07 10:33 EST ------- The encodings of at least some of the example C code is deliberate; it's not right to convert those to UTF-8. I've applied the patch to convert the info file though, and also the BuildRoot tag fix - thanks a lot! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=34473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071546.m17FkGYl030842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-07 10:46 EST ------- w.r.t. the original review: the static libneon.a has been dropped in Raw Hide, since we haven't linked rpm linked against neon for a while. The dep_libs are now also stripped from the .la file to prevent dep leaks. The goal of removing .la files is to prevent unnecessary dep leaks; that goal has now been achieved, without removing the .la file and breaking the neon-config interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071554.m17Fs0RP032168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-07 10:53 EST ------- To be clear: once this passes review (hoping it does, given that its simplicity :), I won't build the package into the distribution until the new version of neon is going in, since it's not used by anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071553.m17Frd5t032056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 10:53 EST ------- Here is the formal review (following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines): +: good, -: needs fixing, =: needs attention MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. publican.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt [ok] publican.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL2 [Needs fixing - see above] publican.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided documentation-devel [ok] [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [=] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [=] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [=] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. See comments above: main package and -doc subpackage should mention the license of the documentation and templates. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. As commented earlier. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. See suggestion above though. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [-] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) See above posted comment. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Must use desktop-file-install [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071556.m17Fu9xq000488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226029, which changed state. Bug 226029 Summary: Merge Review: libidn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226029 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226029] Merge Review: libidn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071556.m17Fu8xT000458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libidn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226029 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-07 10:56 EST ------- Fabulous, APPROVED. You're very welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 15:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226189] Merge Review: neon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071558.m17Fwq1u000769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: neon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226189 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rdieter at math.unl.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-07 10:58 EST ------- I'll have to remove myself, at least for now (-ENOTIME), to open the door for someone else to help here. Joe, thanks for your efforts re: .la files, that's likely a reasonable compromise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:04:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071604.m17G4N1f002066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-07 11:04 EST ------- It's a hash of waf itself. If not installed system-wide, when you run waf it unpacks those files to a directory under the home directory of a similar name: ~/.waf-%{version}-%{hash}. It allows multiple copies of waf to not conflict with each other. Parag, Thomas, thoughts? If it's better to change it then I can do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071607.m17G7JDm024116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 11:07 EST ------- diff -u publican.spec.orig publican.spec --- publican.spec.orig 2008-02-07 16:20:38.000000000 +1000 +++ publican.spec 2008-02-08 02:01:31.000000000 +1000 @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ Summary: Common files and scripts for publishing Documentation Version: 0.27 Release: 0%{?dist} -License: GPL2 +License: GPLv2+ Group: Applications/Text -Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%(id -u -n) +Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Buildarch: noarch Source: %{name}-%{version}.tgz # need kdesdk for po2xml @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ - Update custom xsl to use docbook-xsl-1.73.2: this will break formatting. - Remove CATALOGS override - Remove Red Hat specific clause from Makefile.common -- Fixed inavlid xhtml BZ 428931 +- Fixed invalid xhtml BZ 428931 - Update License to GPL2 - Add GPL2 Header to numerous files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:11:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071611.m17GBq3h003752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 11:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294222) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294222&action=view) publican.spec-1.patch See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for BuildRoot and using desktop-file-install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:21:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071621.m17GLoTv005619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-07 11:21 EST ------- No, it's still waiting for a new spec/srpm with some of the above issues resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071626.m17GQHfA006573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-07 11:26 EST ------- * Thu Feb 7 2008 Joe Orton 2.01_10-35 - use %{_localestatedir}, remove tabs, require httpd not webserver, mark webalizer.conf config(noreplace) (#226536) I think this addresses all outstanding issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 16:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071649.m17GnRSl000525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-07 11:49 EST ------- Looks OK to me. Again, please build into dist-f9-upstart for now, and I'd like to comaintain. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071702.m17H2cEZ003865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 cjdahlin at ncsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cjdahlin at ncsu.edu 2008-02-07 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: event-compat-sysv Short Description: Upstart events to emulate SysVInit Owners: sadmac,notting Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:12:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:12:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071712.m17HCANo005872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-07 12:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071714.m17HEXsa016711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-07 12:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071717.m17HH1lu006887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-07 12:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:19:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071719.m17HJGgC007131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-07 12:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071723.m17HNG4F008039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-07 12:23 EST ------- Curious as to why the GFDL is being used for the -docs? Of course, this is not a Fedora document, and the license choice is at the discretion of the upstream. But if you ever wanted Fedora to publish the how-to documentation included in this package, it needs to be under the OPL without restrictions. If you want to leave that concern for the future, Red Hat (as the copyright holder) can always relicense or dual license. But since you are addressing the licensing in the -brand packages, thought you might want to handle this one at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 17:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235113] Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071731.m17HVgYT009820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: slf4j - Simple Logging Facade for Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235113 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 18:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071807.m17I7I7X017174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-07 13:07 EST ------- Doewsn't build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=399155 At least "ImageMagick" is missing from BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 19:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071911.m17JB1dX030591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-07 14:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > Unlike zlib, the upstream for libffi is in GCC - Otherwise Spot would not have > > > to lift the code from GCC's code base. > > > > It's true that for the past 10 years virtually all development has happened > > within the GCC project. However, the FSF has always been clear that libffi is > > not part of GCC. > Can you provide any evidence for this statement? Not easily. Most of this discussion was in private email with rms and one or two of the SC members. My email from those days is lost in an unsalvageable Outlook folder. If you check with rms he will verify my claim. > I wonder if GCC-SC knows about your decision and what they think about it. I don't know, but it's certainly no secret. Do you really think anybody would have a problem with it? I've certainly been encouraged to release a new unbundled libffi release by GCC developers in the past. I agree, however, that we wouldn't be having this conversation if the GCC project installed libffi and supported the ffi.h interface for its users. AFAICT there are no plans to do this. Even if there were, it certainly won't happen in a timeframe that works for spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 19:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071914.m17JEktF031039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-07 14:14 EST ------- - Source must be given with full URL Fixed. - Fedora specific compilation flags don't seem to be honored correctly. Maybe I'm being dense, but I'm not sure what you mean. - Would you try to use relative symlink instead of absolute one? Fixed. - When using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. Fixed. - It seems "Requires: gimp" is needed because `gimptool --gimpdatadir` is owned by gimp but not by gimp-libs. Fixed. New spec and srpm at: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/mathmap.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/mathmap-1.2.4-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 19:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071928.m17JSNtp001496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-07 14:28 EST ------- Did you mean to reject this package? fedora-review: - is usually reserved for packages that can never meet the Fedora guidelines, ie they have a License issue or the like. Set fedora-review: ? and assign this bug to yourself if you intend to review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 19:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071940.m17JesK2004004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net 2008-02-07 14:40 EST ------- oops, Kevin is right. I misunderstood the review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 19:47:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802071947.m17Jl8hX005122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-07 14:47 EST ------- I have no problems with shipping it separately if it does have separate releases. Do we need to wait for the 3.0 release to actually have this in Fedora, though? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072057.m17KvQe9020182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.7.8-4.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072057.m17KvEEh020125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.4.1-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072058.m17KwqSb031648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:58 EST ------- serenity-1.7.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072059.m17KxZnL031801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:59 EST ------- serenity-1.7.1-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072057.m17KvTRH031240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:57 EST ------- flam3-2.7.8-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072057.m17KvCgm031110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:57 EST ------- perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072057.m17KvOGX031206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:57 EST ------- flam3-2.7.8-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 284961] Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072058.m17Kws9o031690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: serenity - KDE Style and Window Decoration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284961 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.7.1-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428955] Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072059.m17KxBHc020908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 15:59 EST ------- guitone-0.7-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 21:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072100.m17L0Qq3021683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 16:00 EST ------- twitux-0.60-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 21:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072100.m17L0Sdr021719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.60-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 20:59:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428955] Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072059.m17KxD9l020946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428955 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.7-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 21:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428955] Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072103.m17L39BL001191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guitone - A frontend for Monotone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 16:03 EST ------- guitone-0.7-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 21:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431044] Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072100.m17L0BMT000336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ccom - Perl module for context-sensitive phonetic string replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431044 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-07 16:00 EST ------- perl-ccom-1.4.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 22:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072221.m17MLhUj016812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-02-07 17:21 EST ------- I can't speak for Tom, but I'd bet he's completely forgotten about this. If someone else can review, I'll work with them on changes as necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 22:29:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072229.m17MTm9N018130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-07 17:29 EST ------- Upstream has been nice, merged patches and changed its licensing, so here is a new spec version that hopefully will pass both legal and technical review: Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/argyllcms/argyllcms.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/argyllcms/argyllcms-0.70-0.1.Beta8.fc9.src.rpm I've added a patch based on the suggestion in comment #15 to the mix. Please yell if it's a bad idea. gcc developer comments tend to eat my brane. Build-tested on fedora-devel x86-64 only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 22:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429416] Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072238.m17Mcnqu019812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 cjdahlin at ncsu.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 22:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429028] Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072238.m17McoCk019848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 Bug 429028 depends on bug 429416, which changed state. Bug 429416 Summary: Review Request: event-compat-sysv - sysVinit compatibility for upstart https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429416 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 22:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072245.m17MjIhE021169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-02-07 17:45 EST ------- The patch from comment #14 is fine - I've done similar things in the past too. It is quite a large patch so probably worth sending upstream too, since FORTIFY_SOURCE is becoming ever more widely used. Confirmed that the cgats/ and icc/ files are now plain MIT licensed, so the result is simply "GPLv3 and MIT" which is fine for Fedora. The spec still passes review on tech grounds too, so marking this approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 23:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072307.m17N7JDi026528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #291027|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de 2008-02-07 18:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294285) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294285&action=view) Patch to allow building with FORTIFY_SOURCE Maybe you should use this version, it is a little bit shorter, because it only uses braces to avoid macro expansion instead of changing the function name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 23:19:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430441] Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072319.m17NJrKH016037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xautolock - Launches a program when your X session has been idle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430441 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.2-4.fc8 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-07 18:19 EST ------- pushed to Fedora 7 and 8 stable repos (i forgot to link the bug numbers) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 23:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072346.m17Nksan000928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-07 18:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-Upload Short Description: Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Owners: xulchris Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 23:50:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:50:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072350.m17NoPpd022046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 7 23:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802072354.m17NsCQV022583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-07 18:54 EST ------- * Thu Feb 7 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 6.1u3-5 - Rewrite initscripts - Remove spurious Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig - Add License explanation file and fix License tags http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine-6.1u3-5.fc8.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/gridengine.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 00:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:02:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080002.m1802cV5024268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-07 19:02 EST ------- * Wed Feb 06 2008 Ian Weller 1.2-2 - Fixed the fact that qosmic wouldn't even build (added BuildRequires) - Fixed the fact that qosmic wouldn't even run (Patch1) build ok on dist-f9, dist-f8, and dist-fc7 spec http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/qosmic/1.2-2/qosmic.spec srpm http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/qosmic/1.2-2/qosmic-1.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 00:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] New: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.stone at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper-0.9.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Net_URL_Mapper provides a simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for your web applications. The URL syntax is similar to what can be found in Ruby on Rails or Python Routes module and as such, this package can be compared to what they call a router. Still, Net_URL_Mapper does not perform the dispatching like these frameworks and therefore can be used with your own router. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 00:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080018.m180I9U7027398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-URL-Mapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 01:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 20:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080103.m1813d2b015173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-07 20:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #90) > Curious as to why the GFDL is being used for the -docs? Of course, this is not > a Fedora document, and the license choice is at the discretion of the upstream. > But if you ever wanted Fedora to publish the how-to documentation included in > this package, it needs to be under the OPL without restrictions. If you want to > leave that concern for the future, Red Hat (as the copyright holder) can always > relicense or dual license. But since you are addressing the licensing in the > -brand packages, thought you might want to handle this one at the same time. The default license, GFDL, was chosen because the brand packages each use a different free(ish) license and I thought adding one more free license to the mix couldn't hurt :) My method was to pick one of the "Good Licenses" from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-19fc3ef10add085a28cb06784dc34ef8b05a9bd6-2 that wasn't covered by any of the brand packages. The docs in this package use the default brand & license, thus they get the GFDL. I'd like to change the default license to Creative Commons Share-Alike (CC-SA) v3.0 as it's the only documentation license I could find that is accepted as free by Debian, and so would enable the widest distribution of this package. See http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080410.m184A9px003744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-07 23:10 EST ------- + is OK - is Needs work Review: + package builds in mock. koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402237 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. thaifonts-scalable.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/fonts/conf.avail/90-ttf-thai-tlwg-synthetic.conf ==>%config(noreplace) /etc/fonts/conf.avail/90-ttf-thai-tlwg-synthetic.conf + source files match upstream url 9dbeef8d508d199cafb69152cf9a762d thaifonts-scalable-0.4.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. SHOULD: 1) you can write only rm also instead to write /bin/rm 2) your make install command should be make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080435.m184ZDPr016919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 23:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #85) > It would probably be good to tag /usr/share/publican/Common_Content/common/*-* > with %lang tags too. (Thinking more, I am not really sure if this is a good idea or makes sense: anyway probably not worth doing at this state anyhow.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:37:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080437.m184bZ9t020452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 23:37 EST ------- Thanks for the review. :) > thaifonts-scalable.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/fonts/conf.avail/90-ttf-thai-tlwg-synthetic.conf I think conf.avail files do not need to be noreplace: they can be copied and edited in conf.d if necessary. > SHOULD: > 1) you can write only rm also instead to write /bin/rm > 2) your make install command should be > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" Thanks, I will fix those before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:54:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:54:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080454.m184sieg019741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|431829 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080456.m184uSnQ020352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 23:56 EST ------- *** Bug 225356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225356] Review request: fonts-thai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080456.m184uRUB020323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review request: fonts-thai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225356 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 23:56 EST ------- Thanks for the good start with packaging these fonts. Finally we should have decent Thai fonts in F9. :) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431829 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 04:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080454.m184shBx019713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|225356 | nThis| | Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-07 23:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: thaifonts-scalable Short Description: Thai TrueType fonts Owners: petersen Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080600.m1860sE1001481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(notting at redhat.com|needinfo?(mbarnes at redhat.com |) |) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 01:00 EST ------- mbarens, Sorry. I am not sure here whether to keep -static package here or not? I think you can add static package back to this package. As I see that repoquery --whatrequires gtkspell-devel --repoid development-source --archlist src ===> drivel-0:2.1.1-0.3.20071130svn.fc9.src gajim-0:0.11.4-1.fc9.src inkscape-0:0.45.1-5.fc9.src sylpheed-0:2.4.8-2.src ocaml-lablgtk-0:2.10.0-1.fc9.src perl-Gtk2-Spell-0:1.03-6.fc8.src gtranslator-0:1.1.7-7.fc9.src balsa-0:2.3.22-1.fc9.src gg2-0:2.3.0-6.fc9.src pidgin-0:2.3.1-2.fc9.src gnome-python2-extras-0:2.19.1-12.fc9.src tomboy-0:0.9.5-1.fc9.src poedit-0:1.3.9-1.fc9.src logjam-1:4.5.3-11.fc9.src pan-1:0.132-2.fc8.src I will leave this issue to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:05:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:05:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080605.m1865jnt002591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 01:05 EST ------- oops s/static package/libgtkspell.a file/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080612.m186Ci7K000693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-08 01:12 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080613.m186DGW0003864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-08 01:13 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080628.m186S2U8003198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-08 01:28 EST ------- Added EL-5 too per request of xulchris. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 06:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 01:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080656.m186u8V4007873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-08 01:56 EST ------- Ok, I'll look at Stefan's new patch once the package is imported New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: argyllcms Short Description: ICC compatible color management system Owners: nim Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 07:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 02:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431829] Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080705.m1875W1Q009544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thaifonts-scalable - Thai TrueType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431829 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-08 02:05 EST ------- Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 07:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 02:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] New: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/yoltia/yoltia.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/yoltia/yoltia-0.22.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Yoltia is a computer program for editing image files. It provides the functionality to do simple changes to a large number of pictures quickly and very comfortable and exactly. Most of its usage is done via hotkeys. Yoltia is written for Linux systems and published as free software under GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 07:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 02:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080726.m187QU8Q013365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-08 02:26 EST ------- Argh please remove F-7, I don't want to deal with pre-PolicyKit device permission setup New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: argyllcms Short Description: ICC compatible color management system Owners: nim Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 08:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:23:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080823.m188NoHF022913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 08:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080837.m188bVrJ025354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 03:37 EST ------- koji build failed for me http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402634 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 08:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080850.m188oaxs030460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-02-08 03:50 EST ------- We could of course patch waf to use /usr/share/waf, but to me this merely looks like a cosmetic issue, and I'm not sure if there is a real argument for doing so. The FHS only recommends that packages should use 'a subdirectory' under /usr/share, but doesn't state what the name of that subdirectory should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 08:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080850.m188osjE030529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at linuxnetz.de) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 03:50 EST ------- You need following patch ================================================================================= --- unicap-0.2.19/libunicapgtk/Makefile.am 2007-08-30 11:25:42.000000000 +0530 +++ unicap-0.2.19/libunicapgtk/Makefile.am.new 2008-02-08 11:36:51.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = Makefile.in INCLUDES = -I../include -I../libucil @GTK_PACKAGE_CFLAGS@ -AM_CPPFLAGS = $(GTK_CPPFLAGS) -DSYSCONFDIR="\"$(sysconfdir)\"" -DBACKENDDIR="\"$(prefix)/lib/unicap$(pkg_version)/backends\"" -DPKG_VERSION="\"@lt_major@\"" +AM_CPPFLAGS = $(GTK_CPPFLAGS) -DSYSCONFDIR="\"$(sysconfdir)\"" -DBACKENDDIR="\"$(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/backends\"" -DPKG_VERSION="\"@lt_major@\"" if BUILD_UNICAPGTK UNICAPGTK_LIB=libunicapgtk.la ================================================================================ But this requires automake in %prep. Can you check this and submit new SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080917.m189HDOI004334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-08 04:17 EST ------- But when I tried build this package in koji it was ok. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402731 What should I do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080928.m189SDYI006291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-08 04:28 EST ------- Krzysztof: you've tested only on F8, but the preferred testing target is rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:32:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080932.m189W2WG007249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-08 04:32 EST ------- 1.) Please remove the .svg suffix, it won't build in rawhide with it: gcx.desktop: Icon=/usr/share/gcx/gcx.svg 2.) I'm wondering if you could replace Source2: gcx.svg with the actual URL you got it from. 3.) Does the RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make any sense here? make %{?_smp_mflags} RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080934.m189YhOT004612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-08 04:34 EST ------- Please add a comment about upstream above this line -- I guess you keep the source for the tarball in fedora-astronomy repository? Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Not a blocker though -- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080939.m189dpO4008605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-08 04:39 EST ------- Oops, pardon -- not yet ready for approval. 1.) rpmlint redmode.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/redmode.conf Please add %config(noreplace) to the corresponding line in %files. Note, if it's not meant to be modifiable by user, it would be better in %{_datadir} 2.) please add BuildArch: noarch so that -debuginfo doesn't get generated, etc. I believe the script is noarch, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080946.m189kcjr007067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 04:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294329) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294329&action=view) suggested patch to compile yoltia with gcc43 Please try this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080948.m189mS0B007463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 09:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802080948.m189mn5M007518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081000.m18A0sLt009947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |redmode-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081000.m18A0hCC009894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 05:00 EST ------- Hey mtasaka, Thanks for this patch. I just used that and this package built successfully on my rawhide machine now. I was actually figuring out how to solve problem in qt packages but looked like it is gcc issue from patch name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081001.m18A13I7012878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gcx-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081006.m18A6XrO011366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-08 05:06 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/yoltia/yoltia.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/yoltia/yoltia-0.22.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for review and thanks for patch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081017.m18AHQ9l016240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-08 05:17 EST ------- There are dots missing at the end of %descriptions. The files in %_bindir also share a common namespace, so in there too they should be fox-PathFinder and fox-calculator. (and corresponding man pages). Adie.stx looks like a config files. It should be in %_datadir, and it should be possible to override it with a file in %_sysconfdir and a file in $HOME/.something. fox-config should be a wrapper around pkg-config calls to avoid multilib conflicts. the pkgconfig file for fox is wrong. There is certainly no need to link against all those libs to link against fox. Libs: should only contain link flags for libraries that will be used directly by applications linking against fox. Libs.static: should contain link flags for the remaining libraries linked against the fox library (but not needed directly by applications linking against the fox library). You can have an idea about that by doing ldd -u -r /usr/bin/adie it will show all the overlinking in that example. Looking at the fox headers, it seems to me that fox completly hides the underlying X/GL and image libs, so that Libs should only be: Libs: -L${libdir} ${FOX_LIBS} Regarding the include files there are very strange things, namely there are autoconf conditionals in headers, like in fx3d.h #ifdef HAVE_GLU_H This is not right, these conditionals should be in .cpp files, not in the API. The file xincs.h is especially full of these, and also full of include files for other APIs. However it doesn't seems to be included in any other file, so it may certainly be dropped completely from the fox API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081043.m18AhptJ021130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 05:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402818 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. ae49da3e9f22569d81b278a1e0eb7b42 yoltia-0.22.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:47:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081047.m18AlBsN019135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-08 05:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yoltia Short Description: Qt based picture editing program Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:52:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428973] Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081052.m18AqXwD020132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vodovod - a pipe connecting game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428973 kvolny at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 10:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430541] Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081052.m18Aq73o020078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskcoach - Your friendly task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430541 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-08 05:52 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 11:09:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 06:09:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081109.m18B9KF7025782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gmp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2008-02-08 06:09 EST ------- Thanks for both comments the problems are fixed in gmp-4.2.2-5.fc9 - (the license tag is LGPLv3+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 11:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 06:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081122.m18BMf7T027987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-08 06:22 EST ------- Some IRC discussion concluded that something weird happening in my mock, that doesn't happen on koji builders, thus the above is not a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 12:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081204.m18C4ICi032597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 07:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294345) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294345&action=view) libdir patch This patch will solve only one issue but you need to look how to solve hardcoded library issue. In unicap-0.2.19/cpi/vid21394/Makefile.in file, I see its hardcoded as libdir = $(prefix)/lib/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 12:06:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081206.m18C6bXL003692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 07:06 EST ------- skip comment #10 please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 13:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081305.m18D5qQU011543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-08 08:05 EST ------- The correct (TM) approach would be 1. To systematically eliminate all local overrides of libdir (such as the stuff cited in comment #11) and to replace all occurrences of $(prefix)/lib with $(libdir) in all Makefile.ams. 2. To regenerate the Makefile.ins and create a patch from the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 13:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081327.m18DRNoO017887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-08 08:27 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dx-samples New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 13:26:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081326.m18DQnRM017831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-08 08:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dx New Branches: EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431672] Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081417.m18EHvH7028210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scythia - Just a small ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431672 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-08 09:17 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081420.m18EK6c4025156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-08 09:20 EST ------- Please use the following URLs instead Spec URL: http://gnome.eu.org/rspam.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome.eu.org/rspam-0.0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm sorry for the inconvenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081418.m18EIUc5024679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-08 09:18 EST ------- Please use the following URLs instead of the original ones: Spec URL: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss-0.0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm I'm sorry for the inconvenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081434.m18EYpmQ027621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2008-02-08 09:34 EST ------- I made Source0 point to an actual tarball which should address all your points (checkout instructions are no more necessary). http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-toolkit.spec http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/sugar-toolkit-0.79.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:34:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081434.m18EYSHg027582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(redhat- | |bugzilla at linuxnetz.de) | ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-08 09:34 EST ------- I'll have a look to this likely this evening, because I was at a customer on-site the last few days where I just had a lack of time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081436.m18EaZ5e032045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 09:36 EST ------- For 6.1u3-5: * License - Sorry, I should have written the proposal spec file more verbosely, however what I meant was that all subpackages (except for main "gridengine" package) should have the license tag: "BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL" (i.e. the same license tag as -devel subpackage). Currently all subpackages (other than -devel subpackage) inherit the license tag of main package. * service name - You seem to have changed the name of services, however the scriptlets are not updated. ----------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost gridengine]# LANG=C rpm -ivh gridengine-6.1u3-5.fc9.i386.rpm gridengine-execd-6.1u3-5.fc9.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:gridengine ########################################### [ 50%] 2:gridengine-execd ########################################### [100%] error reading information on service sgeexecd: No such file or directory error: %post(gridengine-execd-6.1u3-5.fc9.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081440.m18Ee0Tm032451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 09:39 EST ------- Well, I am still waiting for bug 430978 ...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 14:55:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] New: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Crystal Space is a free (LGPL) and portable 3D SDK written in C++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081500.m18F0rTZ032612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |432034 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081500.m18F0q6i032582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-08 10:00 EST ------- Note this package requires crystalspace who's review is bug 432033. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] New: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cel.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/cel-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Crystal Entity Layer (CEL) is a game entity layer based on Crystal Space. It makes it easier for game developers to create games based on Crystal Space. CEL can optionally be used together with Python or other scripting languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:06:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081506.m18F6EIb006237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 10:06 EST ------- * compiler falgs - Well, what "Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored" means is related to "Compiler flags" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines When using gcc or g++, we must ensure that the compiler option specified as %optflags are correctly used. On rawhide i386 system, currently they are: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ However the build log (from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402716 ) shows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- gcc -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -DCGEN_CC="\"gcc -O2 -c -fPIC -o\"" -DCGEN_LD="\"gcc -shared -o\"" -O2 -Wall `gimptool-2.0 --cflags` `pkg-config --cflags gmodule-2.0 gthread-2.0 gtksourceview-1.0` -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DTEMPLATE_DIR=\"`gimptool-2.0 --gimpdatadir`/mathmap\" -DPIXMAP_DIR=\"`gimptool-2.0 --gimpdatadir`/mathmap\" -DENABLE_NLS -DMATHMAP_CMDLINE -DGIMPDATADIR=\"`gimptool-2.0 --gimpdatadir`\" -DMATHMAP_VERSION=\"1.2.4\" -DRWIMG_JPEG -DRWIMG_PNG -DRWIMG_GIF -o mathmap_common.o -c mathmap_common.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- , where %optflags are not correctly honored. * LOCALEDIR - And as far as I checked build.log, perhaps LOCALEDIR is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430366] Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081512.m18FCYoh002606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430366 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(michael.kyne- | |phillips at sky.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 10:12 EST ------- ping? Unless we resolve ffmpeg problem, this review request must be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:24:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081524.m18FOpvS009606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 10:24 EST ------- This does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403358 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081537.m18Fb9Ev012491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-08 10:37 EST ------- Oops! * Fri Feb 8 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 6.1u3-6 - Fixup subpackage License tags - Service name change in scriptlets Updated spec should be all you need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081549.m18FnTsG014566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 10:49 EST ------- Fix the license tag to "GPLv2+". Other things are okay. + spec file good + source file coincides with upstream + Actually builds http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=402718 build.log no problem + can be installed, Requires okay + seem to work --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (qosmic) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 15:55:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081555.m18FtNLU016172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 10:55 EST ------- This does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403391 Note: As this review request does not block FE-NEEDSPONSOR, you can try to build your srpm by koji scratch build as: $ koji build --scratch If the build is successful, the result rpms and some logs are put on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225876] Merge Review: gtkspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081705.m18H5IpD032661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gtkspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225876 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(mbarnes at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-02-08 12:05 EST ------- To keep package sizes down we generally don't include static libraries unless there's a specific need for it. I think the packages you listed all link to gtkspell's shared library. Closing this for now. Feel free to reopen if you still see an issue here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081712.m18HC0ge028094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 12:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294385) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294385&action=view) Updated license text For 6.1u3-6: * License: - Ah.. I checked debuginfo file and I noticed that qtcsh source codes are actually used (for qtcsh only). So I updated the license document. The spec file must be updated as: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Name: gridengine Version: 6.1u3 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software Group: Applications/System # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+, which is not used or linked by other parts # of gridengine. # And the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qtcsh is # under BSD with advertising, # which is not used or linked by other parts of gridengine. License: (BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL) and GPLv2+ and BSD with advertising URL: http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ ......................... (The license of other subpackages need not updated) ......................... %{_libdir}/libjuti.so # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+ # And only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qtcsh is # under BSD with advertising %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- License tag got very complicated :) Other things are okay!! ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gridengine) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:12:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081712.m18HCM3g001347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081714.m18HE285028418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-08 12:14 EST ------- New sources: http://people.redhat.com/pmachata/tbb/tbb.spec http://people.redhat.com/pmachata/tbb/tbb-2.0-2.20070927.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081713.m18HD43w028211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-08 12:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Doesn't build. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=384728 Problems with GCC 4.3. Release 2 of tbb package contains a patch that fixes the syntactic part of the build problem; and does the build in debug mode, to work around the semantic part of the build problem. I'm communicating with upstream to provide definitive solution to issues with GCC 4.3. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403569 > - Source must be given with full URL Fixed. > - Please bump release number every time you modify your spec file > to avoid confusion. Done. > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed. > - Doesn't this support ppc/ppc64 archs? No, it doesn't. Per upstream report they are working on that, but are not quite there yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:15:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081715.m18HFEIf028968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-08 12:15 EST ------- It looks like it is complaining about not being able to find the gssapi_krb5 library, which is part of krb5-devel. When I build it (manually) on my host after I remove krb5-devel (which also removes neon-devel and openssl-devel) it complains about needing neon-devel, which I then install neon-devel. neon-devel requires krb5-devel and openssl-devel (which *is* needed by python-svn to build), and it automatically installed when I `yum install neon-devel`. Does this not occur with koji? Do I need to specify *all* deps even though some of them are dep'd by other build deps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081725.m18HPhWt030726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 12:25 EST ------- Only just tried to build, but after some long time it failed only on ppc?? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=403509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:34:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081734.m18HYnJT031880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-08 12:34 EST ------- Updated the spec. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gridengine Short Description: Distributed Computing Management software Owners: orion Branches: F-8 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081740.m18HetTe000836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 12:40 EST ------- Umm? [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpm -q neon-devel neon-devel-0.27.2-4.i386 [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpm -q --requires neon-devel /bin/sh expat-devel gnutls-devel libneon.so.27 neon = 0.27.2-4 pkgconfig rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel Also: [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpm -q neon-devel krb5-devel neon-devel-0.27.2-4.i386 krb5-devel-1.6.3-4.fc9.i386 [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ rpm -e --test neon-devel openssl-devel cups-devel kdelibs3-devel w3c-libwww-devel libyaz-devel kdnssd-avahi-devel [tasaka1 at localhost i386]$ neon-devel does not seem to require krb5-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:41:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081741.m18Hf2D8005979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-08 12:41 EST ------- Note the issue in comment #2 is bug #432062 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218769] Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081747.m18HlGD0001918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-en - english dictionaries for hunspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218769 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:48:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081748.m18Hm5Qq007070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net 2008-02-08 12:48 EST ------- Agreed. Source0 has a type, though. Should be 'sources', not 'source'. Please fix before importing to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 17:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 12:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081752.m18Hqxko007898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-08 12:52 EST ------- Adding NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:05:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:05:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081805.m18I5hEa005929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-08 13:05 EST ------- I'm using f8, I notice that you're using rawhide. In f8, neon deps openssl and openssl deps krb5. I'll add krb5-devel as a build-requires, I was just a little suprised to see that it failed to build in koji while it builds fine on two of my machines (but, both are x86_64 f8, so not diverse at all). $ sudo yum remove krb5-devel Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading "changelog" plugin Setting up Remove Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: livna.cat.pdx.edu * fedora: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu * updates: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 set to be erased --> Processing Dependency: krb5-devel for package: openssl-devel --> Running transaction check ---> Package openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 set to be erased --> Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel --> Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel --> Running transaction check ---> Package neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 set to be erased ---> Package neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 set to be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Removing: krb5-devel x86_64 1.6.2-9.fc8 installed 2.0 M Removing for dependencies: neon-devel x86_64 0.27.2-2 installed 385 k neon-devel i386 0.27.2-2 installed 325 k openssl-devel x86_64 0.9.8b-17.fc8 installed 4.9 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 0 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 4 Package(s) Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Erasing : neon-devel ######################### [1/4] Erasing : krb5-devel ######################### [2/4] Erasing : neon-devel ######################### [3/4] Erasing : openssl-devel ######################### [4/4] Removed: krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 Dependency Removed: neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 Complete! Then... $ sudo yum install neon-devel Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading "changelog" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: livna.cat.pdx.edu * fedora: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu * updates: mirrors.cat.pdx.edu Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: openssl-devel for package: neon-devel ---> Package neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: krb5-devel for package: openssl-devel --> Running transaction check ---> Package krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: neon-devel x86_64 0.27.2-2 fedora 158 k neon-devel i386 0.27.2-2 fedora 152 k Installing for dependencies: krb5-devel x86_64 1.6.2-9.fc8 fedora 1.1 M openssl-devel x86_64 0.9.8b-17.fc8 fedora 1.8 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 4 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 3.3 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/4): neon-devel-0.27.2- 100% |=========================| 152 kB 00:00 (2/4): krb5-devel-1.6.2-9 100% |=========================| 1.1 MB 00:04 (3/4): openssl-devel-0.9. 100% |=========================| 1.8 MB 00:04 (4/4): neon-devel-0.27.2- 100% |=========================| 158 kB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing: krb5-devel ######################### [1/4] Installing: openssl-devel ######################### [2/4] Installing: neon-devel ######################### [3/4] Installing: neon-devel ######################### [4/4] Installed: neon-devel.x86_64 0:0.27.2-2 neon-devel.i386 0:0.27.2-2 Dependency Installed: krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.6.2-9.fc8 openssl-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.8b-17.fc8 Complete! And... $ rpm -q --requires neon-devel /bin/sh expat-devel libneon.so.27()(64bit) neon = 0.27.2-2 openssl-devel pkgconfig rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel /bin/sh expat-devel libneon.so.27 neon = 0.27.2-2 openssl-devel pkgconfig rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel $ rpm -q --requires openssl-devel krb5-devel libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) libssl.so.6()(64bit) openssl = 0.9.8b-17.fc8 pkgconfig rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 zlib-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081806.m18I6Wb4010649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 mpg at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081815.m18IFV8M011952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 ------- Additional Comments From mpg at redhat.com 2008-02-08 13:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-toolkit Short Description: Sugar toolkit Owners: mpg Branches: F-8 OLPC-2 InitialCC: mpg Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431707] Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081820.m18IKjjg012943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-toolkit - Sugar toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431707 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:20 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 203662] Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081823.m18INv3K013426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx - Open source version of IBM's Visualization Data Explorer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203662 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:23 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:25:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 205057] Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081825.m18IPQtv009315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dx-samples - OpenDX Examples https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205057 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:25 EST ------- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081827.m18IRpdp009557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:27 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081830.m18IUxYU010432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:30 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081832.m18IWjWC015283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-08 13:32 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 18:58:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:58:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] New: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream- handling tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/cstream/2.7.4-3/cstream.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/cstream/2.7.4-3/cstream-2.7.4-3.src.rpm Description: General-purpose stream-handling tool cstream filters data streams, much like the UNIX tool dd(1). It has a more traditional commandline syntax, support for precise bandwidth limiting and reporting and support for FIFOs. Data limits and throughput rate calculation will work for files > 4 GB. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081909.m18J9nSW022019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-08 14:09 EST ------- Indeed. I've added the gstreamer-devel build requirement and tested a build making sure I wasn't keeping any packages in the build root (which I probably did the first time without realizing). Worked for me. I also updated to the latest version. Find the new 0.3.2-1 in the same location. Note that you might need to rebuild pigment 0.3.4 before. I've committed it to CVS on the devel branch, although I won't build it until this package is reviewed and approved, since it would be a regression otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227118] Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081928.m18JSSB2020470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper-3.2.3-1jpp - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227118 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rafaels at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-08 14:28 EST ------- We already have tanukiwrapper in Fedora...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081931.m18JV04d025997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-08 14:31 EST ------- argyllcms-0.70-0.8.Beta8.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081936.m18Ja8DU022015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:35:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081935.m18JZsbj027038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-08 14:35 EST ------- Thanks Dennis (and to every contributor to this review) I've now pushed argyll for F8 testing and F9. Since this is a very new package, with little testing, I don't intend to push it to F8 stable before someone confirms it works. If people new to color management (useful for pictures, video, graphic work, etc) are looking for an OEM instrument without paying the proprietary software usually bundled with it, I suggest taking a look at http://www.freelists.org/archives/argyllcms/01-2008/msg00369.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081957.m18JvnIv025629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-08 14:57 EST ------- Err, should have been: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-4.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081954.m18JsooR024888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-08 14:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294409) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294409&action=view) Changes made to the python-svn spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 19:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 14:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802081957.m18Jv0cG025558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-08 14:57 EST ------- New spec and SRPM available: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn.spec http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-3.f8.src.rpm (Sorry about the previous very long post, should have put that in as an attachment) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 20:11:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:11:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082011.m18KB825001335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de 2008-02-08 15:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294410) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294410&action=view) Avoid an possible double free in scanin This double free may happen if the last row of color patches has been cropped due to printer margins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 20:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 15:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429712] Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082032.m18KWcTv005272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429712 ssorce at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2008-02-08 15:32 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ipa Updated Fedora Owners: rcritten, simo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 21:09:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082109.m18L9jFv014852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-08 16:09 EST ------- Thanks Stefan, your auditing is appreciated. You can continue posting fixes there or on upstream's ML (http://www.freelists.org/archives/argyllcms/), I'll push them both ways -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 21:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082118.m18LIjcZ008698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-08 16:18 EST ------- php-pear-HTTP-Upload-0.9.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 21:26:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082126.m18LQ9i1018306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-08 16:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qosmic Short Description: A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: ianweller Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 21:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082130.m18LUvlG011308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-08 16:30 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-HTTP-Upload New Branches: EL-5 Jens said he added an EL-5 branch, and I got an e-mail from packagedb to that regard, but when I try to do a cvs up -d command, the EL-5 branch is not showing up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 21:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082146.m18LkP2L013981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-08 16:46 EST ------- Build issues on F9 (fedora-devel) have been resolved. Spec URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor.spec SRPM URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/condor-7.0.0-4.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 22:31:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082231.m18MVVj6020950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-08 17:31 EST ------- Checked in and built. Added to comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 22:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 17:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082258.m18Mw0nK024552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2008-02-08 17:57 EST ------- Successfully built on F9: $mock -r fedora-devel-i386.cfg condor-7.0.0-4.el5.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ cd /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ ls -alF total 80348 drwxr-sr-x 2 nsantos mock 4096 Feb 8 17:48 ./ drwxr-sr-x 5 nsantos mock 4096 Feb 8 17:35 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 2432332 Feb 8 17:48 build.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 23756936 Feb 8 17:47 condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 12415405 Feb 8 17:36 condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 43146428 Feb 8 17:48 condor-debuginfo-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 342602 Feb 8 17:47 condor-static-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 165 Feb 8 17:35 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 16530 Feb 8 17:48 root.log Confirmation of requires/provides: $ for i in `ls *.rpm`; do echo; echo $i; echo "Provides:" ; rpm -qp $i --provides; echo "Requires:"; rpm -qp $i --requires; done condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm Provides: config(condor) = 7.0.0-4.fc9 perl(Condor) perl(Execute) = 1.00 perl(FileLock) = 1.01 condor = 7.0.0-4.fc9 Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service /sbin/service /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/perl config(condor) = 7.0.0-4.fc9 gsoap krb5-libs libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcom_err.so.2 libcrypt.so.1 libcrypto.so.7 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GLIBC_2.0) libgsoapssl++.so.0 libk5crypto.so.3 libk5crypto.so.3(k5crypto_3_MIT) libkrb5.so.3 libkrb5.so.3(krb5_3_MIT) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libpcre.so.0 libpq.so.5 libresolv.so.2 libssl.so.7 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) mailx openssl pcre perl >= 0:5.006 perl >= 1:5.0 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(English) perl(Execute) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(FileHandle) perl(FileLock) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(POSIX) perl(Socket) perl(Sys::Hostname) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(warnings) postgresql-libs rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) shadow-utils condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.src.rpm Provides: (none)Requires: imake flex byacc tcsh pcre-devel postgresql-devel openssl-devel krb5-devel gsoap-devel bind-utils m4 autoconf rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 condor-debuginfo-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm Provides: condor-debuginfo = 7.0.0-4.fc9 Requires: rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 condor-static-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm Provides: condor-static = 7.0.0-4.fc9 Requires: condor = 7.0.0-4.fc9 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Rpmlint output: condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor condor E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/execute condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/execute condor E: condor non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/condor/execute 01777 E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/log condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/log condor E: condor non-standard-uid /var/lib/condor/spool condor E: condor non-standard-gid /var/lib/condor/spool condor W: condor service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/condor W: condor incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/condor $prog W: condor service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/condor condor-7.0.0-4.fc9.src.rpm condor-debuginfo-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm condor-static-7.0.0-4.fc9.i386.rpm Matt: you had addressed the user and perms issues before, the service warnings are expected, can you look into the "incoherent-subsys" warning? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 23:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082304.m18N4x3E025402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-08 18:04 EST ------- That warning appears because the condor init script actually controls a program called "condor_master". I would like to keep the init script's name "condor" as that is the service that is being controlled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 8 23:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802082308.m18N8h9q026347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |mfarrellee at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2008-02-08 18:08 EST ------- Sounds good, thanks for clarifying. Looks like all issues have been resolved, I'm marking this as fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 00:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090024.m190OlhC005812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-08 19:24 EST ------- First of all. let me say, as a former LSF suer, that I am more then happy to see this program finally arriving in our land. Kudos! Second, a couple of comments - please add a note before the Source0 tag, explaining that upstream explicitly prohibits direct download, hence the missing full URL in this field. For verification, one can provide the required personal info data at http://parrot.cs.wisc.edu/v7.0.license.html and download the sources from http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/cgi-bin/downloads/download.pl/v7.0#7.0.0-source-code - there is no need to create a "patch" in order to add the init.d script. Just provide it as Source1 and use it as such (not that what you have done is not correct; it's just unnecessary complicated) - the build log says: checking for javac... no configure: WARNING: javac not found checking for jar... no configure: WARNING: jar not found Would condor be happier with icedtea / gcj as BR ? -there is a "checking for zlib... no" line in the build log; would a BR zlib-devel be nbeneficial ? - parallel compiling seems to be disabled (and commented in the spec). Is it still intended ? - rpmlint says condor.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/condor We usually require services to not be enabled by default -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 00:29:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090029.m190TiWB006577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-08 19:29 EST ------- s.suer.user. !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 00:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] New: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kcoloredit/kcoloredit.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kcoloredit/kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: KColorEdit is a palette files editor. It can be used for editing color palettes and for color choosing and naming Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=405234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 00:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 19:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] New: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kiconedit/kiconedit.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kiconedit/kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: KIconEdit is designed to help create icons for KDE using the standard icon palette. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=405369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 02:12:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090212.m192Cx9Z030583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 02:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090232.m192WBB8000848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 21:32 EST ------- I confused on Requires: oxygen-icon-theme. Can it be Reqires: hicolor-icon-theme? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 02:33:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090233.m192XqYZ000993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 02:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090252.m192qMPH003789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 21:52 EST ------- On my rawhide machine, When I rebuilt this srpm and installed rpm, I got Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/kcoloredit.mo from install of kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Tamil-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/kcoloredit.mo from install of kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Japanese-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/kcoloredit.mo from install of kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Punjabi-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/kcoloredit.mo from install of kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Chinese-Big5-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/kcoloredit.mo from install of kcoloredit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Chinese-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 02:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090258.m192wbxP004601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 21:58 EST ------- Just found that repoquery --whatprovides oxygen-icon-theme kdebase-runtime-0:4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 03:02:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090302.m1932gCN005536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-08 22:02 EST ------- when tried to install I got, Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Korean-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Tamil-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Japanese-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Punjabi-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Chinese-Big5-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch file /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/kiconedit.mo from install of kiconedit-4.0.1-1.fc9.i386 conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-Chinese-3.5.8-3.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 04:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] New: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail-1.13-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: CheckGmail is a system tray application that checks a Gmail account for new mail. It is fast, secure, and uses minimal bandwidth via the use of Atom feeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 05:31:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 00:31:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090531.m195V84X021262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-09 00:31 EST ------- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=406827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 06:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090618.m196IJR8027981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-09 01:18 EST ------- Re: no source URL, there is no URL because I process the source tarball before including it in the SRPM. The tarball that UW distributes is 100MB+ and includes copies of what they call "externals", such as Globus and PVM, that this package does not use. Yes, the init script is overly complicated, and will hopefully be part of a future source release anyway. Re: java & jar, if you inspect the source, you'll discover that these tests do not actually change anything. Re: zlib, you'll notice %configure ... --without-zlib, because the features of Condor that require zlib are not included in this package. Re: make -j, yes, dependencies are not setup correctly for parallel make. Re: enabled by default, if this is a requirement, I can change the init script. Thank you for your comments. I hope my clarifications are helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 06:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090619.m196JDdS028068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-09 01:19 EST ------- 1)Source url should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 2) Good if you either use macros for all commands in SPEC like for rm also or drop macro use for commands to install -Dpm 0755 checkgmail $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/checkgmail gzip -d man/checkgmail.1.gz install -Dpm 0644 man/checkgmail.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/checkgmail.1 3) Good if you download source like and submit new SRPM wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/checkgmail/checkgmail-1.13.tar.bz2 this will preserve upstream tarball release timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 06:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 01:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090626.m196Q4OZ029407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-09 01:26 EST ------- 4) rpmlint output on RPM checkgmail.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/checkgmail-1.13/ChangeLog The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). checkgmail.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/checkgmail-1.13/Readme The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). Add following to %prep iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 ChangeLog > ChangeLog.utf8 mv ChangeLog.utf8 ChangeLog iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 Readme > Readme.utf8 mv Readme.utf8 Readme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 07:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090740.m197eYPW007988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-09 02:40 EST ------- New revision: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail-1.13-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 07:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386341] Review Request: fxload - A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090758.m197wbRq018371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386341 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-09 02:58 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fxload New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 09:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090921.m199LM08032204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-09 04:21 EST ------- timestamps not preserved as asked in comment #2 upstream tarball contains -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 187616 2008-01-17 12:00 checkgmail -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1770 2007-05-08 18:56 checkgmail.1.gz rpm installed that file as -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 187616 Feb 9 14:41 /usr/bin/checkgmail -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1770 Feb 9 14:41 /usr/share/man/man1/checkgmail.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 09:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090932.m199WWlC025913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 09:43:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090943.m199hpbX027820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-09 04:43 EST ------- 1)you may like to add distag to release as Release: 3%{?dist} 2)good if you add tests to %doc that will create rpmlint warning to silent it add to %prep chmod 644 tests/test1.sh 3) CFLAGS value is CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' So you don't need to add -Wall. Also, any reason to add "-Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Werror" to make install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 09:57:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 04:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431976] Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802090957.m199vcU1005787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yoltia - Qt based picture editing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431976 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-09 04:57 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again fo review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 11:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091118.m19BIj94011865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-09 06:18 EST ------- Not really. I had a more precise look at the code/output, and it seems that the 2 images shipped in the package are not used. webalizer.png is not used at all, while msfree.png is used as an example in a commented out section of the config file. So I think that they should definitively be in %doc if shipped at all. The issue of webalizer running as soon as it is installed is still an issue in my opinion. Just like webalizer installing /var/www/usage and filling it as soon as it is installed. There are many ways to fix that. I see 2 possibilities: * have a separate webalizer-cron package which owns /var/www/usage and /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer /etc/httpd/conf.d/webalizer.conf with a very clear %description stating that it modifies httpd configuration and starts automatically webalizer. * have /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer read /etc/sysconfig/webalizer and have a variable in /etc/sysconfig/webalizer that enables webalizer, and ship /etc/httpd/conf.d/webalizer.conf in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 11:45:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091145.m19Bj9qf024342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-09 06:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294463) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294463&action=view) spec file fixes Minor fixes (dot end description, INSTALL='install -p' at the right place no -f for rm for files that are to be here to be noticed when they are not here anymore, failsafe install-info script). And a fix for examples to clean it and remove Makefile* while not touching the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 12:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091227.m19CRKmE022992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-09 07:27 EST ------- Thanks for the patches. Looks OK. I'm leaving %check off for now. Upstream has been contacted and says he'll look into it, but he's busy for now. https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/unuran.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/unuran-1.1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091313.m19DD8fE030595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-09 08:13 EST ------- I think we can close the bug report. xgterm is not needed to run Iraf and I'm not interested in this package anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378951] Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091316.m19DGxHj007133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378951 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-09 08:16 EST ------- Can you close the bug and mark it as NEXTRELEASE as it's suggested in the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:24:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091324.m19DOnef032225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-09 08:24 EST ------- Marek, if we can't redistribute the catalog you need to create a custom tarball and build the rpm with it. Does the program work without this particular catalog or you are planning to substitute it with a new one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091342.m19Dgnok011026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091340.m19DeLQO010721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-09 08:40 EST ------- A remaining issue: I cannot use the source url, it leads to unauthorized. Minor issues: The Version isn't in sync with %changelog. The buildrequires imake isn't needed (unless I am wrong). Missing dots at the end of devel and examples %descriptions. I suggest calling Site.local along ncl-Site.local instead. I also suggest shortening a bit the devel package summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 13:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 08:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091346.m19Dkef7003391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-09 08:46 EST ------- Hopefully that works http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/checkgmail-1.13-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 14:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091417.m19EHnhS009199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-09 09:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294467) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294467&action=view) patch for tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 14:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091417.m19EHF2j009119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-09 09:17 EST ------- REVIEW: * rpmlint : W: no-documentation * The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. * The spec file name match the base package * The package meet the PHP Packaging Guidelines * Fedora approved license (BSD) * License field in the package spec file match the actual license * The spec file is written in American English * The spec file is legible * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source 11a4d002f881ac5d957cdbb6b46139f7 Net_URL_Mapper-0.9.0.tgz * build in mock (rawhide, noarch) * All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires * no locales * no shared library files * package own all directories that it creates * Package don't own files or directories already owned by other packages * no duplicate files * Permissions on files are set properly * %clean section * package consistently use macros * The package contain code * no documentation * no library * no desktop file * %install, start with rm -rf %{buildroot} * All filenames are valid UTF-8 * scriptlets are sane * Final Provides ok php-pear(Net_URL_Mapper) = 0.9.0 php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper = 0.9.0-1.fc8 **** Final Requires not OK /usr/bin/pear php-pear(Net_URL) >= 1.0.14 (see below) php-pear(PEAR) Must fixe: Requires: php-pear(Net-URL) >= 1.0.14 To : Requires: php-pear(Net_URL) >= 1.0.14 Should fixe test suite. Using the attached patch, all provided tests (19+12+22) succeed. I know running tests during build is not always simple, but it still usefull (as least an "how to" provided) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 14:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091424.m19EOOaY018060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-09 09:24 EST ------- Hmm, it fails with an assembler syntax error while assembling code generated by g++ -> toolchain bug. I've filed bug 432185 for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 14:39:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091439.m19EddWJ020493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #294467|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-09 09:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294468) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294468&action=view) 294467: patch for tests and package.xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 14:40:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 09:40:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091440.m19EeHFI020898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-09 09:40 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294469) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294469&action=view) patch to use patch in specfile + add %check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:01:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091501.m19F1fPD016282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-09 10:01 EST ------- Forget the %check. Doesn't work (at least in mock) Or just keep it for documentation purpose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091503.m19F3Q3J024770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091507.m19F7APv017350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-09 10:07 EST ------- If possible I would like to continue with the review of this, if bug 432185 doesn't have a fix in sight when the review is completed I'll just add ExcludeArch ppc for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091516.m19FG5Uo026929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-09 10:16 EST ------- Well, I want to review this, however if you want me to review this package please wait until I write comments on other (about) 5-6 review requests... (and perhaps I will go to bed in one or two hours) BTW I am reviewing bug 426492 , however this fails to rebuild with gcc43 on many points and I would appreciate it if you would help me fixing the source codes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378951] Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091520.m19FKnru027612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378951 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091529.m19FTAWn020655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-09 10:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > BTW I am reviewing bug 426492 , however this fails to rebuild > with gcc43 on many points and I would appreciate it if you would > help me fixing the source codes. Okay, I've downloaded the srpm (link in the review is broken btw) and I'm working on fixing this with gcc-4.3 now. Feel free to drop requests like this to me more often, I think you're doing an _awesome_ job with all those reviews and I'm always happy to help out where I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249614] Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091531.m19FV4vn029292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11iraf - X utilities for IRAF (Image Reduction Analysis Facility) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249614 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-09 10:31 EST ------- Okay. Then once closing. If you got interested again, please feel free to open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091550.m19FoIll024188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-09 10:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294471) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294471&action=view) PATCH: fix compilation with gcc4.3 Mamoru Tasaka asked me to take a look at fixing the gcc-4.3 compilation errors seen in F-9. This patches fixes them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 15:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091556.m19FuNll025189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-09 10:56 EST ------- This time rebuild failed with %check. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=408441 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091602.m19G2f0E001928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-09 11:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=408453 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 8f6742ba9c09f7b7b23a5be2e14708c7 checkgmail-1.13.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: 1)Remove unnecessary line from SPEC INSTALL="install -p" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091610.m19GAXar027821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mai https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-09 11:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: checkgmail Short Description: System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail Owners: sundaram Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091615.m19GFTpV028588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: checkgmail -|Review Request: checkgmail - |System Tray Application that|System Tray Application that |checks a Gmail Account for |checks a Gmail Account for |New Mai |New Mail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091631.m19GVpkh030937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-09 11:31 EST ------- For 2.0-2.20070927: * no-ldconfig-symlink - From rpmlint *rpm: ------------------------------------------------------------ tbb.i386: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libtbbmalloc.so.2.0 tbb.i386: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ This is because the symlink name does not match the SONAME of the library it points to. ------------------------------------------------------------ $ objdump --headers --private-headers libtbb.so.2.0 | grep SONAME SONAME libtbb_debug.so.2 ------------------------------------------------------------ and this is because from build.log: ------------------------------------------------------------ 100 g++ concurrent_hash_map.o concurrent_queue.o concurrent_vector.o itt_notify.o cache_aligned_allocator.o pipeline.o queuing_mutex.o queuing_rw_mutex.o spin_rw_mutex.o spin_mutex.o task.o tbb_misc.o mutex.o -lpthread -lrt -ldl -fPIC -o libtbb_debug.so.2.0.014 -shared -m32 -Wl,-soname=libtbb_debug.so.2 310 + install -D -m 755 libtbb_debug.so /var/tmp/tbb-2.0-2.20070927.fc9-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/libtbb.so.2.0 311 + ln -s libtbb.so.2.0 /var/tmp/tbb-2.0-2.20070927.fc9-root-mockbuild//usr/lib/libtbb.so.2 ------------------------------------------------------------ you have to actually change the soname of the library. * Compilation flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. ------------------------------------------------------------ 58 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/tbb20_20070927oss_src/build/obj_debug' 59 ../../build/Makefile.tbb:38: CONFIG: cfg=debug arch=ia32 compiler=gcc os=linux runtime=cc4.3.0_libc2.7.90_ker nel2.6.18 60 g++ -c -MMD -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-siz e=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -DTBB_DO_ASSERT -DDO_ITT_NOTIFY -DUSE_PTHREAD -g -O0 -m32 -fPIC -Wall -Werror -I../../src/tbb -I../../include -I../../src ../../src/tbb/concurrent_hash_map.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------ Here the compilation flag "-O2" is replaced by the latter "-O0" flag. * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091643.m19GhC5C032628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-09 11:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Note that you might need to rebuild pigment 0.3.4 before. I've committed it to > CVS on the devel branch, although I won't build it until this package is > reviewed and approved, since it would be a regression otherwise. Well, then I don't want to review this because I want to make it sure that the rebuild succeeds on all archs on koji (there are many cases in which problems are found on other than i386 arch). BTW don't you want to see the "regression" until this package gets approved even if it is on rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 16:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:53:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091653.m19GrWMq001758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-09 11:53 EST ------- You must register for an account at http://www.earthsystemgrid.org/ before downloading the source. I complained about this on the NCL list, but they feel that their government contracts dictate that they try to collect usage statistics and they feel this is the only option available for them. Made a note of this in the spec. Upped the release number. imake provides makedepend which is used. added dots Fixed up devel summary/description Not sure I understand about Site.local. Seems fine the way it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 17:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] New: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jakub.rusinek at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager-latest.src.rpm Description: Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator that allows you to: * automatically detect new partitions at startup; * fully manage configuration of filesystem; * Enable/disable write support for NTFS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 17:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091752.m19HqhrN011263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-02-09 12:52 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdbpy/python-imdbpy.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-imdbpy/python-imdbpy-3.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Changes: - Package name is python-imdbpy now - Remove *.py* files in /usr/bin and move for examples directory in docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 18:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091814.m19IE6B0022786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-09 13:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > You must register for an account at http://www.earthsystemgrid.org/ before > downloading the source. I complained about this on the NCL list, but they feel > that their government contracts dictate that they try to collect usage > statistics and they feel this is the only option available for them. Made a > note of this in the spec. This is really, really (really) annoying. Moreover it doesn't make sense since anybody can repost the archive and deployments are better done through packages. I personnally don't want to approve a package with such a restriction done upstream. Otherwise I think that the package is acceptable. > imake provides makedepend which is used. Not a blocker, but a comment would be nice. > Not sure I understand about Site.local. Seems fine the way it is. My point is that Site.local is not really specific of ncl, one could imagine that a file with the same name is in another package. Disambiguating the same in SOURCES may be useful in settings where the same SOURCES directory is used for all packages. As I said, only a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 18:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091849.m19InmpR028404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-09 13:49 EST ------- from your spec file: %{__rm} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop desktop-file-install \ --vendor fedora \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ desktop/%{name}.desktop to have a clean spec file you could do the following in the future desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --delete-original \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ desktop/%{name}.desktop I'm sponsoring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 18:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428586] Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091852.m19Iqhs5021082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428586 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-02-09 13:52 EST ------- http://wtogami.livejournal.com/23144.html Description of blocker in LDM that needs to be fixed before Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 18:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091852.m19IqEf9021007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-09 13:52 EST ------- Please follow the following guidelines to commit to CVS http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Please DO NOT REQUEST a "devel" branch if this package is not compatible with KDE4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 18:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091853.m19IrYJS021229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-09 13:53 EST ------- Sorry, a small mistake on #11: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --delete-original \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:42:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386341] Review Request: fxload - A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091942.m19Jg4jW004934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload - A helper program to download firmware into FX and FX2 EZ-USB devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386341 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-09 14:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091944.m19JiC2Y029453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-09 14:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cairo-clock Short Description: Cairo-rendered on-screen clock Owners: sereinit Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091946.m19JkGo3005767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-09 14:46 EST ------- Should be fixed now. Can you check and confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091952.m19JqPYB030976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-09 14:52 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429712] Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091949.m19JnG2F030269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipa - The Identity, Policy and Audit system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429712 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-09 14:49 EST ------- added simo as co-maintainer. Note that you can use the pkgdb web interface to request such things without cvsadmin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091954.m19Jsv7n031223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-09 14:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 19:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802091957.m19JvJLp031883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-02-09 14:57 EST ------- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/ruby-openid/ruby-openid-2.0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Changes: - Remove examples for doc package (the examples is not complete for inclusion in package yet) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 20:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:24:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432152] Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092024.m19KOFDg003888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: checkgmail - System Tray Application that checks a Gmail Account for New Mail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432152 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 20:29:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:29:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092029.m19KTwXN004682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-09 15:29 EST ------- Sergio, I have my working copy from sky2000 catalogue, I'll provide it in few days. But another package (starplot) is using this ugly closed thing and it's already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 20:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 15:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092054.m19KsaqT016752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-09 15:54 EST ------- Yep, fixed now, thx :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 21:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227115] Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092108.m19L88kY011426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: saxon8-B.8.7-1jpp - Java Basic XPath 2.0, XSLT 2.0, and XQuery 1.0 implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227115 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-02-09 16:08 EST ------- I would import the srpm, but I cannot find it in the URL given above. Does anyone has a copy of it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 21:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092118.m19LIAFT021024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-09 16:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper-0.9.0-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Feb 9 2008 Christopher Stone 0.9.0-2 - Add test file patch (bz #431955) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 21:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432205] New: Review Request: exe - eXe eLearning XHTML editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432205 Summary: Review Request: exe - eXe eLearning XHTML editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/exe.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/exe-1.03.0.3373-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: eXe, the eLearning XHTML editor, is an authoring environment which enables teachers to publish web content in standard package formats (like IMS Content Packages and SCORM) without the need to become proficient in HTML or XML markup. Content generated using eXe can be used by any Learning Management System. --- Note to reviewers, exe uses an included (older) copy of twisted and nevow (which builds on top of twisted). I've tried making exe use the system version of both, but it will not work with the system version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 22:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092210.m19MAfWr029551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-02-09 17:10 EST ------- 1) Of course. Added. 2) The Makefile.am remarks that the tests do not work (due to the output format being slightly different). I'd presume running them at %check time or shipping them as docs does not make sense, then. 3) Can a double -Wall hurt? Adding "-Wall -Wextra -Werror" makes it clear which set of warnings/errors we want, so that's what I'd go for. Compilation should be done before "make install", so I do not deem it necessary to define the CFLAGS there. Updated package at http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/cstream/2.7.4-4.fc8/ * Sat Feb 09 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 2.7.4-4 - Add %%{?dist} to Release: * Fri Feb 08 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann - 2.7.4-3 - More compile warnings (-Wall -Wextra -Werror). - Redacted description down to the most important points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 23:51:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092351.m19NpanF004986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-09 18:51 EST ------- Build issues on F9 resolved (gcc 4.3.0 is strict wrt headers) Test failures necessitated ExcludeArch for ppc, ppc64 and x86_64, with BZs filed that are ready to be assigned to a classads component and block relevant FE-ExcludeArch-* tickets Spec URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads.spec SRPM URL: http://grid.et.redhat.com/files/classads-1.0-0.2.rc3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 9 23:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 18:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802092351.m19NpjA2012812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-09 18:51 EST ------- I'm CCing Debarshi Ray, the owner of starplot, so he can notice the problem with the catalog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100002.m1A02o3N014858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-09 19:02 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100003.m1A03mQu007073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-09 19:03 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100006.m1A067ef007650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:06:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100006.m1A0689T007675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: disk-manager|Review Request: disk-manager |- Disk manager is a simple |- Disk manager is a simple |filesystem configurator |filesystem configurator ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-09 19:06 EST ------- Please note that according to the headers of the files available at http://codebrowse.launchpad.net/~givre/disk-manager/trunk/files/flomertens%40gmail.com-20070716195847-5f86mlx0ufug68fo?file_id=diskmanager-20070411132806-a0qdn4eststnd1g7-1, the correct license is GPLv2+ (despite a couple of files being LGPL) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420431] Review Request: gkrellm-top - GKrellM plugin which shows 3 most CPU intensive processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100037.m1A0bMkc012273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-top - GKrellM plugin which shows 3 most CPU intensive processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420431 Bug 420431 depends on bug 422691, which changed state. Bug 422691 Summary: GKrellM for EPEL 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422691 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100044.m1A0ir7T013126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-09 19:44 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 00:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100045.m1A0jsRa021458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-09 19:45 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 05:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] New: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-1/nettle.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-1/nettle-1.15-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Nettle is a cryptographic library that is designed to fit easily in more or less any context: In crypto toolkits for object-oriented languages (C++, Python, Pike, ...), in applications like LSH or GNUPG, or even in kernel space. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 07:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100706.m1A76Xbs016142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-10 02:06 EST ------- ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 07:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100735.m1A7Z81W012796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 02:35 EST ------- So, "GPLv2+ or LGPL" or "GPLv2+" should be in license tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 09:16:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431669] Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100916.m1A9GLpp029858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkyahoo - Yahoo Messenger client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431669 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 04:16 EST ------- Upstream said "gtkyahoo is long since out of date.". So I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 09:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100925.m1A9Pv9A028555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 04:25 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin-2.0-4.beta2a.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for patch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 09:45:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 04:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802100945.m1A9jKXD006597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From belegdol at gmail.com 2008-02-10 04:45 EST ------- GPLv2+ and LGPL (with appropriate version). Then put a comment explaining which files are under LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 10:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240373] Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101000.m1AA0MEg001958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtiplot - Data Analysis and Scientific Plotting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240373 Bug 240373 depends on bug 344641, which changed state. Bug 344641 Summary: Package is missing in the repo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=344641 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 10:02:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101002.m1AA2Bvl009709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-10 05:02 EST ------- Ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 10:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] New: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cgoorah at yahoo.com.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/electronic-menu/electronics-menu.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/electronic-menu/electronics-menu-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The programs from the category Electronics are currently located in the Edutainment directory. This Package adds a Edutainment->Electronics menu to the xdg menu structure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 10:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101031.m1AAVP4N007672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 05:31 EST ------- Spec URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager-latest.src.rpm Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 10:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101046.m1AAkaMC009948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-10 05:46 EST ------- I'm having a chat to upstream about the issues relating to the code to get feedback. I have linked the review request in my email he has advised that he will take a look and comment so I'll await his comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 11:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101149.m1ABnbO2019520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sereinity at online.fr ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-10 06:49 EST ------- It builds under Mock, and rpmlint return one warning : electronics-menu.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged/electronics.menu Please note that + items are OK, - items should be fixed or justified, ~ items needs further investigation. * MUST items + Respect naming guidelines. + License: GPLv2 OK + The spec file must be written in American English. + The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + Compile on i386 and x86_64 at least. + locales are properly handled. + Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + Not relocatable. + A package must own all directories that it creates. + A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files must be set properly. + Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + The package must contain code, or permissable content. + Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) + If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files must be in a -devel package. + Static libraries must be in a -static package. + Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). + If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. + In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. + Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. * SHOULD Items: + Includes licenses text. + The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. + Builds in mock (i386 & x86_64) ~ Builds on i386 & x86_64 (not tested on PPC) + runs without segmentation faults + No scriptlets. + No subpackages. + The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. + If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 11:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101158.m1ABw1ZJ028205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-10 06:58 EST ------- Thanks Ben?it for this quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 11:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101155.m1ABtKfI027958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sereinity at online.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-10 06:55 EST ------- This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 11:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101158.m1ABwuEH020979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-10 06:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: electronics-menu Short Description: Electronics Menu for the Desktop Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 12:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101211.m1ACBQOT023652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 07:11 EST ------- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (ruby-openid) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 12:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101214.m1ACEiI0023874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-10 07:14 EST ------- There seems to be a small error in the file list. My mock build failed with: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/disk-manager-1.0.1-2.fc9-root-mockbuild RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/disk-manager-1.0.1-2.fc9-root-mockbuild/etc/pam.d/* File not found by glob: /var/tmp/disk-manager-1.0.1-2.fc9-root-mockbuild/etc/security/console.apps/* EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # bash -l -c 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps //builddir/build/SPECS/disk-manager.spec' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 286, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), ret) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 12:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101217.m1ACHv8P031791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 07:17 EST ------- Jason, this bug blocks the following two review requests. Would you update the status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 12:27:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] New: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa-0.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png (and any other image formats supported by Qt library) to AA (Ascii Art) images, using AA-Lib library. It can show preview of converted image and save image into text file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 12:52:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101252.m1ACqmYv004844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 07:52 EST ------- Hans, I noticed today that: (note: I always enable "koji static-repos" repo) [root at localhost ~]# yum check-update .... skip ........ xerces-c.i386 2.8.0-1.fc9 koji-rawhide xerces-c-devel.i386 2.8.0-1.fc9 koji-rawhide .................... [root at localhost ~]# Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package xerces-c-devel.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc9 set to be updated ---> Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.fc9 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: cegui --> Finished Dependency Resolution cegui-0.5.0b-6.fc8.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 is needed by package cegui-0.5.0b-6.fc8.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 is needed by package cegui-0.5.0b-6.fc8.i386 (installed) We have to update cegui first (as this package has cegui-devel as BR) Currently cegui build on rawhide fails as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=411388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 13:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101309.m1AD9hEr007815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-02-10 08:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-openid Short Description: Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities Owners: allisson Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 13:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101309.m1AD9qFt000420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-10 08:09 EST ------- Well the "starplot" package itself does not contain any such catalogs. I think you are referring to the ones provided by: "starplot-gliese3" and "starplot-yale5". These packages have "Redistributable, no modification permitted" as their license. There was a discussion on this on fedora-devel-list at redhat.com : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-November/msg00742.html The conversation included Spot and Hans and it was decided to generate the *.star files, needed by Starplot, from the catalogs in %post because the license allows us to re-distribute the catalogs but not modified copies (eg., *.star files) of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101403.m1AE3MM8016775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 09:03 EST ------- Give me the logs. I can't say what's wrong for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:04:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101404.m1AE4OLM009584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101404.m1AE49mP009520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 09:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294496) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294496&action=view) Patch to honor Fedora cflags correctly Thank you to Hans for fixing gcc43 related issues! For 2.0-0.4: * License ----------------------------------------------------- src/tools/openpgp/gpgproc/ Dual of QPL and GPLv2 (strict) ----------------------------------------------------- - License tag must be GPLv2 (strict). * Compiler flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=411301 The proposal patch attached fixes this issue. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=411576 * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please use "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. ------------------------------------------------------ install -m 644 certs/readme certs/rootcert.xml $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/certs ------------------------------------------------------ Please fix the 3 issues above before committing into CVS. Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (jabbin) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:19:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101419.m1AEJOli019432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 09:19 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin-2.0-5.beta2a.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:20:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101420.m1AEKuDZ012641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101420.m1AEKeME019945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 09:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jabbin Short Description: Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 14:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 09:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101425.m1AEPR5o013341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 09:25 EST ------- Oops.. The string "strict" is not needed in the spec file, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 15:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101521.m1AFLw0P029635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 10:21 EST ------- Actually this does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=411762 You can check if your srpm builds on koji by: $ koji build --scratch Currently can be dist-f9, dist-f8-updates-candidate, or dist-fc7-updates-candidate (and some special targets). If the scratch build is successful, the rebuilt rpms and some logs are put under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 15:39:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101539.m1AFdBIQ024927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 caillon at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caillon at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From caillon at redhat.com 2008-02-10 10:39 EST ------- * For consistency, please use the same ExclusiveArch that the mono spec uses. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/mono/mono.spec?view=auto * Please separate the -devel subpackage Requires onto different lines, because it is difficult to read otherwise. * Does the -devel package need to Require: the items that the main package BuildRequires? With those addressed, this has my review and can land. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 15:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101555.m1AFtJG0002386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 10:55 EST ------- > There seems to be a small error in the file list. It can't be an error, because disk-manager provides few files over there. > checking for consolehelper... no > checking for modprobe... no > checking for mount... no > checking for umount... no > checking for blkid... no > checking for dmsetup... no Error... Missing dependency for usermode and... util-linux-ng, e2fsprogs, device-mapper. -- Spec URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager-latest.src.rpm Should work now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 16:58:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] New: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: goyal.hemant at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.5-6.src.rpm Comments: We need this package for the OLPC XO laptop which is based on Fedora. This is the first package I am creating and hence know it is not up to Fedora Standards as yet, and I am looking for help to achieve the standards. I am looking for a sponsor who could assist me in the process. Description: * Common interface to different TTS engines * Handling concurrent synthesis requests ? requests may come assynchronously from multiple sources within an application and/or from more different applications. * Subsequent serialization, resolution of conflicts and priorities of incomming requests * Context switching ? state is maintained for each client connection independently, event for connections from within one application. * High-level client interfaces for popular programming languages * Common sound output handling ? audio playback is handled by Speech Dispatcher rather than the TTS engine, since most engines have limited sound output capabilities. Thanks! Hemant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:01:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101701.m1AH1OJk005836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101702.m1AH2UeZ013435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 ------- Additional Comments From ismael at olea.org 2008-02-10 12:02 EST ------- Applied all suggestions: Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/omegat.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/OmegaT-1.7.3-4olea.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101724.m1AHOKI8009208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 12:24 EST ------- Why did you close this as NOTABUG? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101736.m1AHasWe011222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101739.m1AHdf6B018745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-02-10 12:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Why did you close this as NOTABUG? I seem to have done that by mistake.. I have reopened it now. Thanks for pointing it out. Although I am not able to figure out what the STATUS for this bug needs to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 17:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432262] New: Review Request: flobopuyo - 2-player falling bubbles game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432262 Summary: Review Request: flobopuyo - 2-player falling bubbles game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/flobopuyo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/flobopuyo-0.20-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: A two-player falling bubbles game. The goal is to make groups of four or more Puyos (colored bubbles) to make them explode and send bad ghost Puyos to your opponent. You win the game if your opponent reaches the top of the board. You can play against computer or another human. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:15:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:15:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] New: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-bookmarks/astronomy-bookmarks.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-bookmarks/astronomy-bookmarks-1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the astronomy bookmarks for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101818.m1AIIX4O017236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:21:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101821.m1AIL5pW017856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:21 EST ------- Jakub, All ok for me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101822.m1AIMVlT025343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:22 EST ------- Release: 1%{?dist} Somewhere I heard that dist tag is not needed in cross-release noarch packages (was it screensaver-frogs review?). Your bookmark file embeds a couple of images/icons. Are you sure those are freely redistributable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101822.m1AIMar7025390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PySBIG Short Description: PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101826.m1AIQ6FJ018664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:26 EST ------- Lubomir, redmode-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101830.m1AIUatM019354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:30 EST ------- Lubomir, gcx-0.9.11-2.fc8.src.rpm updated. There's no link for gcx.svg, it's taken from debian package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101831.m1AIVntY019465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:31 EST ------- Thanks Marek. All outstanding problems were adressed. RPMLint is silent now and I can't find any more issues. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101833.m1AIXcvj026941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 13:33 EST ------- Just leave as ASSIGNED. Potential reviewers can find that currently no one is reviewing this by checking assignee. By the way: Would you check some general guidelines on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines And it is useful that you install rpmdevtools rpm and execute "$ rpmdev-newspec speech-dispatcher" to create a skeleton spec file. Also you can check your srpm or rebuilt binary rpms by $ rpmlint XXX.rpm to detect some generic issues on your rpms. >From a quick glance: * Summary must not be ended with dot (you can detect this by using rpmlint. rpmlint is in rpmlint rpm) * Please consider to use %{?dist} tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * "GPL" license tag is no longer valid for Fedora. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines * Packager tag must not be used. Fedora uses its own tag. * Also Vendor tag must be removed * AutoReqProv: yes is not needed * Please specify BuildRoot (i.e. please don't comment it out) * %setup must be quiet * Please consider to use %configure macro * Support parallel make if possible (please refer to the section "Parallel make" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * BuildRoot must be cleaned up when %install begins. (see the section "Prepping BuildRoot For %install" of the same wiki) * Changing the mode of files must not be done on scriptlets * Please use macros. You should not use /etc/rc.d but should use /etc/rc.d/init.d and the corresponding macro is %{_sysconfdir} * scriptlets must be quiet unless some errors occur. * We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * configuration file must be put under %{_sysconfdir}, not under %{_prefix}/%{_sysconfdir}. Please check configure option. I guess %configure does what you want (check what %configure does by rpm --eval %configure) * python directory is not right. It must be %_libdir/python2.5/site-packages, but you must not write this directory in a explicit form but must use some macros. Please refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python * Files under %infodir are automatically marked as %doc * Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing this package are owned by this package or the subpackages of this package. For example, currently the directory %{_libdir}/speech-dispatcher-modules/ itself is not owned by any package * Please create -devel subpackage and move all development-related files to the subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101839.m1AId6ZY020412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-10 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * Please use macros. > You should not use /etc/rc.d but should use /etc/rc.d/init.d > and the corresponding macro is %{_sysconfdir} The corresponding macro is %{_initrddir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101847.m1AIlGnf021783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-10 13:47 EST ------- Looks good to me too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:46:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101846.m1AIkvT8029243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |182235 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:46 EST ------- Legal team, are these icons an issue? I know we have these also in default-bookmarks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101848.m1AImRmE021902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-10 13:48 EST ------- Thanks Marek. All outstanding problems were adressed. RPMLint is silent now and I can't find any more issues. APPROVED (btw. consider adding a comment stating that the icon is from debian) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 18:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101852.m1AIqJoM030029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ben.lewis at benl.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-10 13:52 EST ------- I'm not sponsored so I can't approve this, but from what I can see it meets every requirement. The only changes I would make are that the word 'providing' should be replaced with 'for' in the summary and description, and 'preview' should be 'previews', also in the description. Source file match upstream: YES Package meets versioning and naming guidelines: YES Specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES Dist tag is present: YES Build root is correct: YES License field matches the actual license: YES License is open source-compatible: YES Latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES Compiler flags are appropriate: YES %clean is present: YES Package installs properly debuginfo package looks complete: YES rpmlint is silent: YES Final provides and requires are sane: YES %check is present and all tests pass: YES No shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths: YES Owns the directories it creates: YES Doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES No duplicates in %files: YES File permissions are appropriate: YES No scriptlets present: YES Code, not content: YES Documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary: YES No headers: YES No pkgconfig files: YES No libtool .la droppings: YES -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 19:15:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101915.m1AJFUYX001405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-10 14:15 EST ------- Further to the above: Forgot to mention that rpmlint is complaining about: pic2aa.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pic2aa-0.2.1/COPYING pic2aa.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pic2aa-0.2.1/AUTHORS on the binary RPM. Also, after a conversation in #fedora-devel, I think that specspo handles translations, so I'm not sure if these should be in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 19:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:29:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802101929.m1AJTZJ5028312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-10 14:29 EST ------- You can use iconv to convert it into UTF-8 Example: %prep iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 file.txt > file.txt.utf8 mv file.txt.utf8 file.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 20:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102000.m1AK0sCd000610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-02-10 15:00 EST ------- Spec URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/waf.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.1erlei.de/waf-1.3.2-5.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - Update to 1.3.2. - Remove version and revision information from path to waf cache. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 20:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102013.m1AKDYoq002512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-10 15:13 EST ------- Note that a devel branch is always created. You can still build against kde3 in devel by BuildRequiring the approprate kde3 development packages. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 20:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102018.m1AKIe2x003413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-10 15:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 20:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102025.m1AKPN2Q004661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-10 15:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 20:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102023.m1AKNnEC004164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-10 15:23 EST ------- The short description here isn't very descriptive... Perhaps consider changing it to "python support for reading SBIG CCD files" or something? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102120.m1ALKaMq020325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool providing converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 16:20 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa-0.2.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for review and thanks for help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102133.m1ALXbar022196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-10 16:33 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/jabbin-2.0-6.beta2a.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102144.m1ALiREb024001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-10 16:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper Short Description: Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Owners: xulchris Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102143.m1ALhPvr016524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pic2aa - |Review Request: pic2aa - |Pic2AA is tool providing |Pic2AA is tool for |converting jpeg/png to AA |converting jpeg/png to AA |(Ascii Art) images |(Ascii Art) images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102146.m1ALkIxI017113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-10 16:46 EST ------- LGPLv2.1+ is not a correct value for the license tag; according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-19fc3ef10add085a28cb06784dc34ef8b05a9bd6 the correct value is LGPLv2+ The Categories tag from the desktop file should not contain Application any more ( see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html , referenced by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755) Some minor issues: - there is no need to included util-linux-ng as BR because it is on the exceptions list (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-4cadce5e79d38a63cad3941de1dadc9d25d67d30-2) - duplicate BR: perl(XML::Parser) is brought in by intltool and device-mapper by e2fsprogs Everything else seems OK at the first glance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 21:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102158.m1ALwPAH018858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah at yahoo.com.au 2008-02-10 16:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Please DO NOT REQUEST a "devel" branch if this package is not compatible with > KDE4. Please ignore this ! this package doesn't need kde -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 22:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102214.m1AMEYDU028984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-10 17:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: redmode Short Description: Switch to and from night red mode Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 InitialCC: astronomy-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 22:43:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102243.m1AMhrGF000800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 17:43 EST ------- Spec URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/disk-manager/disk-manager-latest.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 22:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432195] Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102244.m1AMiica025925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: disk-manager - Disk manager is a simple filesystem configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432195 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-10 17:44 EST ------- I'm only not sure if I should use desktop-file-install for .desktop file in /etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 23:20:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102320.m1ANKrf7007387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-10 18:20 EST ------- rpmlint is complaining about: drupal-views.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/drupal/modules/views/modules 02755 drupal-views.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/drupal/modules/views/po 02755 drupal-views.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/drupal/modules/views/modules/views_forum.inc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 10 23:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802102339.m1ANd1RI002148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-10 18:39 EST ------- I havn't looked into this too much but I noticed a couple of things: The use of PreReq is deprecated. The buildroot is not in the correct form (it dosn't include a %{release}) rpmlint is complaining about xhtml1-dtds.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 59, tab: line 95) (as well as the use of PreReq) Is W3C IPR a valid License short tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 00:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110055.m1B0tfcd021155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-10 19:55 EST ------- Looks good. Parag, review? (Thomas and I will be co-maintaining, so you can review his modifications) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 03:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431156] Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110305.m1B35B2i008855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-openid - Ruby library for verifying and serving OpenID identities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431156 allisson at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From allisson at gmail.com 2008-02-10 22:05 EST ------- Build done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35371 F-7 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35370 F-8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35372 F-9 Thanks for your review Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 04:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110425.m1B4PElF021499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-02-10 23:25 EST ------- please advise as to where the source code for this was originally obtained. ftp.squeak.org does not contain the same source tarball as is bundled in this package. Also note, significant portions of this package appear to be dual licensed under the LGPLv2.1+ and the Squeak license, neither of which are MIT. ./platforms/Cross/plugins/JPEGReadWriter2Plugin/jcomapi.c notes it is licensed and to read a README file, but no such file exists (contrary to the Independent JPEG Group's license). It might be considered free enough, but that's not entirely clear. There's a boatload of MP3 plugin code here. MP3 is patented. ./platforms/Cross/plugins/SoundCodecPrims/ is missing a COPYRIGHT file containing the license for code in that dir too. There's a lot of stuff under a Sun copyright with a permissive license. There's stuff under the Squeak license, not dual-licensed. There's Perl-Compatible-Regular-Expressions which is yet another license... There's GPLv2+ code in ./platforms/unix/plugins/VideoForLinuxPlugin/ccvt_types.h Debian won't carry this even in non-free. This scares me. Thanks to LaserJock for pointing out the legal mess that this code appears to be. Contining to block FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 05:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] New: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06-0.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Compatibility library for guichan version 0.6. The main guichan package will be upgraded to the latest 0.7.1 release at the same time that this package is imported. Currently only one package depends on libguichan-0.6.1 (ballz), and should not require a rebuild. It will, however, need to 'Requires: compat-guichan06-devel' and be patched slightly if/when it ever needs a rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 05:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110543.m1B5hQ61024716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |426746 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 06:09:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110609.m1B69dN3028715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 01:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=413925 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 9caca69cb435911c9ed6ff0519ce19ae waf-1.3.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 06:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110609.m1B69nwi028749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 01:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=413928 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. eab4c98afef79766dd61a6a36dec845a cstream-2.7.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: Though I am not happy with extra flags to compiler just because it gives extra information, its ok to add them here. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 06:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:19:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110619.m1B6Jle7006121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-02-11 01:19 EST ------- Here is 1.2.13 spec and SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1.spec http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/slony1/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.f8.src.rpm There are lots of rpmlint errors, but I could not fix them :( Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 07:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110731.m1B7VcxA009243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-11 02:31 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 07:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110729.m1B7Tq42008617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-11 02:29 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-0.28-0.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican.spec Had to bump the version as I had a couple of important bugs to fix :( * Mon Feb 11 2008 Jeff Fearn 0.28-0 - Added gpl.txt - Fix GPL identifier as GPLv2+ - Fixed Build root - Fix desktop file - Added Provides for documentation-devel - Fix dist build target - Add dist-srpm target - fix dist failing on missing pot dir - Put docs in sub package - Added GFDL to License to cover content and Book_Template directories. - Included GFDL txt file - set full path to source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 08:13:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110813.m1B8DgAE024133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 03:13 EST ------- Benjamin, Thanks for having a look at this package and your review. But, I see that "Fedora user tc1415, aka Benjamin Tomos Lewis has requested membership in the cvsextras group and needs a sponsor." So, its good to review other's packages but you fist get sponsorship and then start changing fedora-review flags. removing fedora-review+ and taking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 09:04:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110904.m1B94r1i024664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 04:04 EST ------- 1)I see that timestamp of upstream tarball is preserved. upstream tarball -> -rw-r--r-- 1 parag parag 156379 2005-02-15 17:42 pic2aa-0.2.1.tar.gz tarball in SRPM -> -rw-rw-r-- 1 parag parag 156379 2008-02-10 15:10 pic2aa-0.2.1.tar.gz 2) Change comment in desktop file to what new summary is now. 3)So you took screenshot posted on upstream web site as icon. Not sure if there will be any licensing issue for using that screenshot as icon for desktop. But looks ok as upstream is not providing any desktop file and icon file and to use that screenshot as icon file. 4) Can you add comment in PL language also in .desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 09:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802110935.m1B9ZWDl030864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(danms at us.ibm.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 10:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111037.m1BAbMPl010466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-11 05:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294547&action=view) failed build failed build in mock/devel/x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 10:41:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111041.m1BAf6Zj011267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-02-11 05:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cstream Short Description: General-purpose stream-handling tool Owners: ndim Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 11:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111138.m1BBcw6V020374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 06:38 EST ------- Is this built for all requested branches? If yes then we can CLOSE this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 11:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111144.m1BBigV5028858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-11 06:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > failed build in mock/devel/x86_64 Looks like a typical gcc-4.3 related issue. Will look into it tonight when I have access to my own machine. Thanks for the pointer. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 11:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111150.m1BBoWuM022304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 06:50 EST ------- I think you can submit this for stable repo now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 11:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111151.m1BBpiP8022400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 06:51 EST ------- NOTE:- Almost 2 months are completing now but still this review is open because of submitter has not built package for EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111201.m1BC1097024175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:01:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:01:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111201.m1BC1Z6x032009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 07:01 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111212.m1BCCsDw026324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-02-11 07:12 EST ------- i will add +x on python files, but for SVG files I can't add shebang. For de desktop file, what's wrong please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111210.m1BCAfeF026137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-02-11 07:10 EST ------- Ok for the line too long on description, but for script-without-shebang on SVG and non-executable-script i can't do anything... SVG are images, so i can't add shebang and "py" files have to be executed by screenlet-manager. So, what can i do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:21:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111221.m1BCLQG8002639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-11 07:21 EST ------- Odd, I just rebuilt based on this spec on f8 and I only get: drupal-views.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/drupal/modules/views/modules/views_forum.inc Which isn't a problem, not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111232.m1BCWFiK004139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-11 07:32 EST ------- I do a lot of work with Drupal, so I'll ask upstream about that zero-length file (I've got a few of them on different servers, and I'm wondering why its like that). I'm definitely still getting those rpmlint errors... and when I rpm -i the package they are set mode 02755. If you untar the source then they are set to that mode in there, which is probably the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111234.m1BCY2nf029397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 07:34 EST ------- For 1.7.3-4: * Spec file name - We request that the name of the spec file must coincide with the name of rpm. * About Source1: - Please write the full URL for Source1. Otherwise please write how you gained Source1 as comments in the spec file * Pre-rebuilt binaries - To make it sure that omegat is built from all free and legally-compatible sources, please remove all pre-rebuilt binaries (like *.jar) first at %prep like: --------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} find . -name \*.jar -exec rm {} . \; ---------------------------------------------------------- * Icon directory - Icon must be installed not under %_iconsdir (/usr/share/icons) but under %{_datadir}/pixmaps * Empty scriptlets - Please remove empty %post/%postun -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111243.m1BChhPF005835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-11 07:43 EST ------- On my system, whether installed or in BUILD/views, they're 0755. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111256.m1BCuL9s008305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 12:56:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111256.m1BCuAD0008260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 07:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=294547) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294547&action=view) [edit] > failed build > > failed build in mock/devel/x86_64 Filed as bug 432336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 13:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111300.m1BD0NbH009088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 ------- Additional Comments From ismael at olea.org 2008-02-11 08:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > For 1.7.3-4: > > * Spec file name > - We request that the name of the spec file must coincide > with the name of rpm. done > * About Source1: > - Please write the full URL for Source1. > Otherwise please write how you gained Source1 as comments > in the spec file I've used the original one inside the sources... done? > * Pre-rebuilt binaries > - To make it sure that omegat is built from all free and > legally-compatible sources, please remove all pre-rebuilt > binaries (like *.jar) first at %prep like: > --------------------------------------------------------- > %prep > %setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} > find . -name \*.jar -exec rm {} . \; > ---------------------------------------------------------- ups. Seems this is an stopping bug for me. I should investigate for fixing this :-/ > * Icon directory > - Icon must be installed not under %_iconsdir (/usr/share/icons) > but under %{_datadir}/pixmaps as now is not using the previos icon, IMHO this is done too. > * Empty scriptlets > - Please remove empty %post/%postun done. Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/OmegaT.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/OmegaT-1.7.3-5olea.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 13:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111337.m1BDbGGK017038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-11 08:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #93) > > - Added GFDL to License to cover content and Book_Template directories. > - Included GFDL txt file I want to reiterate a point here because it may save time and hassle in the future if we resolve this now. You may recall that when the Fedora Project was formed, all the Docs Project work was under the GFDL. This was done as an assumptive move by Project founders, they never asked Legal what license to use, and it turned out to be a mistake. Red Hat Legal (Mark Webbink) required us to re-license all the content, which was a fair bit of work. It is not clear to me if the upstream of publican (in the form of Red Hat's Content Services team) is actually permitted to use the GFDL. It sounds as if you chose to pick a good license from the Fedora Project list and Red Hat Legal may not have been involved in the license choice? Based on the previous commit, it sounds as if Book_Template is covered by the GFDL. I can see in the Book_Info.xml file that Common_Content/Legal_Notice.xml is called by the template. https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-devel/browser/trunk/publican/Book_Template/en-US/Book_Info.xml Does that make just the template under the GFDL or ...? If the template is under the GFDL, I'm unclear on how Fedora is going to use the tool. If I use it to make a book for Fedora, but the book *cannot* be under the GFDL due to Legal's previous restrictions, how does the license affect the content I am going to write into that template? If it makes the content GFDL, then that template cannot be used for Fedora content. This is why I have been advocating across the board usage of the OPL without restrictions for all parts of publican, from the tools to the templates to the branding files. True, there are other licenses that a package can use and have that package be in Fedora (the distro). But if you want the package to be useful to Fedora (the Project), this mix of licenses does not make it clear that it *can* be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 14:16:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111416.m1BEGXFL026174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-11 09:16 EST ------- OK, I guess it won't be too much of a problem to "break" what requires pigment in Rawhide for a few days, since AFAIK only elisa requires it. I've just triggered a new build of pigment 0.3.4 in Rawhide, so you should be able to test a rebuild of pigment-python against it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 14:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386531] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111439.m1BEdmRA031055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386531 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 09:39 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 14:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111440.m1BEegpN031689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 09:40 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 15:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111502.m1BF27bm027484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2008-02-11 10:02 EST ------- > zlib.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/zlib-1.2.3/ChangeLog > The ChangeLog file could use a trip through iconv. Thanks - fixed > > The License: tag says BSD, but I would find it odd if the zlib package isn't > under the zlib license. I believe the License: tag should be "zlib". I have discussed this issue with Tom Callaway and his recommendation was it is "BSD" license so. > I note that there's a small test suite; generally it's a good thing to call test > suites even if they don't do all that much because they serve as a useful sanity > check. But I added a %check section and it seems that "make check" doesn't > actually do anything for some reason. When I call it manually I get some output > ending with "*** zlib test OK ***". I'm not really sure what the problem is. check added. I don't thing there is any reason to add minizip executables to subpackage so I don't like to do it. If I overlook some good reason to do it, write it here please. Thanks a lot. The last version is zlib-1.2.3-17.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 16:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111613.m1BGDRbu010382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-02-11 11:13 EST ------- I didn't rebuild this package for ages (it's basically static immutable data), i will happily take patches cleaning up the spec file for Fedora from someone who is more aware than me about the new packaging rules. Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 16:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:25:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431323] Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111625.m1BGP1dq021367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-ontv - OnTV is a GNOME applet to monitor TV programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431323 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-11 11:25 EST ------- Spec: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv.spec SRPM: http://liviopl.fedorapeople.org/ontv/gnome-applet-ontv-latest.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 16:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111632.m1BGWFYS022785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 16:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 11:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111635.m1BGZMho023363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 nsantos at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nsantos at redhat.com |mfarrellee at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From nsantos at redhat.com 2008-02-11 11:35 EST ------- Built the latest version: $ mock -r fedora-devel-i386.cfg classads-1.0-0.2.rc3.src.rpm init clean prep This may take a while unpack cache setup build ending done Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result $ d /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result total 4124 drwxr-sr-x 2 nsantos mock 4096 Feb 11 11:20 ./ drwxr-sr-x 5 nsantos mock 4096 Feb 11 11:11 ../ -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 293364 Feb 11 11:20 build.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 447566 Feb 11 11:20 classads-1.0-0.2.rc3.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 515001 Feb 11 11:15 classads-1.0-0.2.rc3.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 2234000 Feb 11 11:20 classads-debuginfo-1.0-0.2.rc3.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 105224 Feb 11 11:20 classads-devel-1.0-0.2.rc3.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 526831 Feb 11 11:20 classads-static-1.0-0.2.rc3.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 165 Feb 11 11:11 mockconfig.log -rw-r--r-- 1 nsantos mock 11824 Feb 11 11:20 root.log $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/*.rpm $ Looks good, marking as fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111709.m1BH9G7m020288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-11 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: condor Short Description: Batch system for High Throughput Computing Owners: matt Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111709.m1BH9Isr020321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-11 12:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: classads Short Description: a powerful and flexible, semi-structure representation of data Owners: matt Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111714.m1BHEIrk031275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 12:14 EST ------- Well, ! I recommend to use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=415494 Other things are okay * source coincides with upstream * spec file okay * actually builds http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=415328 * can be installed * Requires okay ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pigment-python) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111731.m1BHVhlb025122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-11 12:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > * no-ldconfig-symlink Good catch, I didn't realize this would happen. It's fixed now. > * Compilation flags I can't give up on -O0, because anything above that screws the build. (I.e. either triggers a bug in gcc, or an undefined behavior in tbb, not sure who the culprit is here). When upstream have their GCC 4.3 support ready, I'll turn the optimizations back on, i.e. will do the release build instead of the debug build. I made a note about this in the spec file. > * Timestamps > - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option > to keep timestamps on installed files. Fixed. New sources: http://people.redhat.com/pmachata/tbb/tbb.spec http://people.redhat.com/pmachata/tbb/tbb-2.0-3.20070927.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234926] Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111740.m1BHekpp027020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ngircd - Next Generation IRC Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234926 andreas at bawue.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas at bawue.net 2008-02-11 12:40 EST ------- checked in and build 0.11.0, fixing CVE-2008-0285. thx for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234882] Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111740.m1BHelFQ027044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libident - New LibIdent C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234882 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111743.m1BHhmQ8027382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. NEEDSPONSOR removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111750.m1BHoGuc028779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:50 EST ------- In reply to comment #16 and #14. Is the source that you remove from upstream Patented or Trademarked such that it can't be shipped in Fedora? If so, please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL If it's just a case of it not being needed/used, but not prohibited code, it would be better to simply just use the upstream source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111753.m1BHrY1x006126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111756.m1BHup2t029756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111755.m1BHtIKt029625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111758.m1BHwND6006892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 12:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 17:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111757.m1BHvqHj006825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 radford at blackbean.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(radford at blackbean.| |org) | ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-02-11 12:57 EST ------- I am waiting for my account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 18:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:04:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111804.m1BI4Vw2031168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 13:04 EST ------- Would you write here for what FAS (Fedora Account System) name are you requesting for being sponsored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 18:12:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111812.m1BICCXY000599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-11 13:12 EST ------- Upstream say that that blank file is just a placeholder: http://drupal.org/node/220326 so it can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 18:16:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111816.m1BIG49v011023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 13:16 EST ------- If you can add a script and note about how you modify the source before checkin, that would be great. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 18:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111820.m1BIKE6Z002413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mfarrellee at redhat.com 2008-02-11 13:20 EST ------- There are three issues: 1) there is source that cannot be distributed; 2) there is about 100MB of source that can be distributed but is never used; 3) there is no link to the source directly, it is behind a registration page I'll add instructions for downloading the source and provide a script to strip out portions we do not want included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 19:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802111908.m1BJ8O0c012859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-11 14:08 EST ------- In case you need to inspect logs, this is the koji task for last spec iteration: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=416087 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 20:24:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112024.m1BKOQqV027271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu)| ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-11 15:24 EST ------- Aargh, setting needinfo made this drop out of my TODO list and I missed it when I was going over my tickets this weekend. I really wish needinfo worked better. Anyway, the new package looks better, but there's a problem with the avoidance of autoconf. First off, if you're going to provide a built configure file, please just supply it as Souce1: instead of patching it in. A patch that does nothing more than add a source file is rather strange. But honestly, I'm not really sure that patching in the configure file is any better than just generating it. It has the benefit of not requiring the autotools and not being dependent on the specific autotools versions that might be installed on each release you're building on, so I guess it's no worse. Frankly I'm not really sure which is the right thing to do, but I've held this ticket up long enough thinking about the issue. So I'll go ahead and approve this, but please move the new configure file to a source file instead of a patch before you check things in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 20:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253249] Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112028.m1BKSw39028074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: classads - a powerful and flexible, semi-structured representation of data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253249 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 20:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112033.m1BKXhbK028914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 mfarrellee at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 20:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112036.m1BKaZob006977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-11 15:36 EST ------- Just pushed, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 20:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283081] Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112048.m1BKm1dx031632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: condor - Batch system for High Throughput Computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 15:48 EST ------- cvs was done here... resetting fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112119.m1BLJYZu005960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-11 16:19 EST ------- Thanks! Thomas, what's your Fedora username? You're not showing up on the Wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112137.m1BLbvtQ019241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-11 16:37 EST ------- php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper-0.9.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112139.m1BLdEfS009740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-11 16:39 EST ------- I'm willing to sync this up with the html401-dtds package (and in fact I've already done most of it locally already a long time ago), will post what I have in a jiffy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112154.m1BLs1Ex022482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-11 16:53 EST ------- These conflicting files will be removed from kde-i18n ASAP. (We want to ship the version from the current kiconedit, not the KDE 3 one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112156.m1BLu2GJ023160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2008-02-11 16:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipcalculator Short Description: A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:57:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112157.m1BLvMWu023587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 21:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112155.m1BLtjZI023127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-11 16:55 EST ------- These conflicting files will be removed from kde-i18n ASAP. (We want to ship the version from the current kcoloredit, not the KDE 3 one.) As for oxygen-icon-theme, it's needed (it's the only theme to provide some of the used icons, and also the global fallback in KDE 4, and also what we're defaulting to), and as you've noticed, it's currently in kdebase-runtime anyway (it might get split out later). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 22:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112202.m1BM2GJX025324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-02-11 17:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Thomas, what's your Fedora username? My username is 'thm'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 22:38:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112238.m1BMcHE7021943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-11 17:38 EST ------- Ok, SRPM, specfile and included *.xml and patches are available at http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/ * Mon Feb 11 2008 Ville Skytt? - 1.0-20020801.1 - Major spec file rewrite, syncing with html401-dtds, most visible changes: - Various XML cataloguing improvements. - Register to SGML catalogs in addition to XML. - Install to %%{_datadir}/xml per the FHS. - Sync with Fedora packaging guidelines. - Silence post-install scriptlet. The SGML catalog patch is there because the scope where a SGMLDECL affects things is not well defined in SGML catalog systems (or at least implementations) and we don't want xhtml1.dcl to mess with anything else but our DTDs. A similar patch is already in the html401-dtds package. If you wish, I'm willing to take ownership or co-maintain this package after the review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 22:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112255.m1BMtrAh025879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-11 17:55 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: waf Short Description: A Python-based build system Owners: salimma, thm Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:04:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112304.m1BN4IO1005848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-02-11 18:04 EST ------- Thanks EriK, Jason -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112306.m1BN6NaS028101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-02-11 18:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-nds-thumbnailer Short Description: Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files. Owners: jbowes Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432080] Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112305.m1BN5Bh5006385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432080 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-02-11 18:05 EST ------- cstream-2.7.4-4 packages are in rawhide and the update queue for F-7, F-8. Thanks for review and CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:15:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112315.m1BNFemm029713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-02-11 18:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Would you write here for what FAS (Fedora Account System) name > are you requesting for being sponsored? My account, radford, seems to be set up now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112350.m1BNorCg014160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-02-11 18:50 EST ------- Assigning the review request to myself and changed the status to 'assigned' according to the guidelines (somehow, this wasn't possible for me yet when I approved this request...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 11 23:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802112350.m1BNoT0C014051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-11 18:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #94) > (In reply to comment #93) > > > > - Added GFDL to License to cover content and Book_Template directories. > > - Included GFDL txt file > > I want to reiterate a point here because it may save time and hassle in the > future if we resolve this now. > > You may recall that when the Fedora Project was formed, lol Sometimes I think you forget just how long you have been around! I certainly haven't been around that long :D > all the Docs Project > work was under the GFDL. This was done as an assumptive move by Project > founders, they never asked Legal what license to use, and it turned out to be a > mistake. Red Hat Legal (Mark Webbink) required us to re-license all the > content, which was a fair bit of work. > > It is not clear to me if the upstream of publican (in the form of Red Hat's > Content Services team) is actually permitted to use the GFDL. It sounds as if > you chose to pick a good license from the Fedora Project list and Red Hat Legal > may not have been involved in the license choice? The default template is not used by the Red hat Documentation Team, they use a different brand licensed under the OPL + Restrictions. The default brand is intended for use by the general open source community and not Red hat or Fedora specific documentation. > Based on the previous commit, it sounds as if Book_Template is covered by the > GFDL. I can see in the Book_Info.xml file that Common_Content/Legal_Notice.xml > is called by the template. Ahhh! Nicely spotted! I should have split out the Book_Template in to each of the brands when I split out the other common content. I will put up new packages today with the per brand Book_Templates. > https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-devel/browser/trunk/publican/Book_Template/en-US/Book_Info.xml > > Does that make just the template under the GFDL or ...? If the template is > under the GFDL, I'm unclear on how Fedora is going to use the tool. If I use it > to make a book for Fedora, but the book *cannot* be under the GFDL due to > Legal's previous restrictions, how does the license affect the content I am > going to write into that template? If it makes the content GFDL, then that > template cannot be used for Fedora content. > > This is why I have been advocating across the board usage of the OPL without > restrictions for all parts of publican, from the tools to the templates to the > branding files. True, there are other licenses that a package can use and have > that package be in Fedora (the distro). But if you want the package to be > useful to Fedora (the Project), this mix of licenses does not make it clear that > it *can* be used. publican-fedora is licensed under the OPL, no restrictions, any content that is being used from the main package will be duplicated in to the fedora specific brand package. I think I have it all duplicated now, but i will take another look over it to check again. Thanks for looking over this package and highlighting things I missed splitting out .. maybe there is something to this "many eyes" philosophy :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:13:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120113.m1C1DfQB027994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 20:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=405234 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. Bur NOT for RPM. kcoloredit.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcoloredit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kcoloredit.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kcoloredit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common ==> Ok to accept here + source files match upstream. 77f69d70f105f83713e427ae0c8f1e5b kcoloredit-4.0.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + xdg-utils scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120113.m1C1DJOR016729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 20:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=405369 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But NOT for RPM. kiconedit.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kiconedit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kiconedit.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kiconedit/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common ==> Ok to accept here + source files match upstream. 77f69d70f105f83713e427ae0c8f1e5b kcoloredit-4.0.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + xdg-utils scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120131.m1C1Vn4s019997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-11 20:31 EST ------- File conflicts fixed in kde-i18n-3.5.8-5.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120131.m1C1VqIx030949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-11 20:31 EST ------- File conflicts fixed in kde-i18n-3.5.8-5.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:34:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120134.m1C1YTJ7031104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ------- Additional Comments From tom at moertel.com 2008-02-11 20:34 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-Matrix Short Description: R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops Owners: tmoertel Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120137.m1C1bPoV020857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-11 20:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > File conflicts fixed in kde-i18n-3.5.8-5.fc9. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120134.m1C1YlVP020226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 tom at moertel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 01:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 20:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120156.m1C1u78w002416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-11 20:56 EST ------- Hi Jason, sorry for out long time, of course that there is a reason, I have a problem with 'rpmlint' command, I get an encoding error about the file 'FILES' of mybasburn upstream, they was writing in ISO-8859-1 and the CLI rpmlint recommend using UTF-8, the output of rpmlint: mybashburn.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mybashburn-1.0.2/FILES So, I have to run this command for the conversion: $ iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF8 FILES > FILES.tmp $ mv FILES.tmp FILES You recommend writing that in the SPEC file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120206.m1C26UAw004557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-11 21:06 EST ------- Okay, now I should be sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:27:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120227.m1C2RbNM007638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-11 21:27 EST ------- No, you should run iconv in the %prep section of the specfile to convert the file at build time. You don't make the changes in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120232.m1C2WitJ008454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 21:32 EST ------- cvs done. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120238.m1C2c02r030091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 21:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120235.m1C2ZgZP029923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 21:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120244.m1C2i0Zu009961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-11 21:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 02:59:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120259.m1C2xEHn000792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2008-02-11 21:59 EST ------- chmod is there for cleanlyness I believe. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 03:01:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120301.m1C31fcd001611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 shenson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2008-02-11 22:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wipe Short Description: Secure file erasing tool Owners: shenson Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 04:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120435.m1C4Zc7P029470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-11 23:35 EST ------- Thanks for the update. > - Added gpl.txt Thanks. This is usually called "COPYING". However the file you included is GPLv3. > - Fix desktop file Thanks. > - Added Provides for documentation-devel publican.src:20: W: unversioned-explicit-provides documentation-devel I would suggest just to drop it unless there is a good reason to keep it, in which case it should be versioned (see Packaging/NamingGuidelines). > - Put docs in sub package Thanks! > - Included GFDL txt file fdl.txt is missing from the tarball. Please also include it in the doc subpackage. > - set full path to source The url needs to go in the Source field. The URL field is for the project URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 04:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:41:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120441.m1C4f1gh019443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-11 23:41 EST ------- > Please also include [fdl.txt] in the doc subpackage. Or what is the license of the docs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 04:43:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120443.m1C4heRU019758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-11 23:43 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294625) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294625&action=view) publican.spec-2.patch some more cleanup suggestions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 04:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120458.m1C4wn8a000343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-11 23:58 EST ------- New spec and srpm: http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-VCS-LibCVS.spec http://people.redhat.com/rnorwood/rpms/perl-VCS-LibCVS-1.0002-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 05:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120500.m1C50hu9000963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-12 00:00 EST ------- I did not fix the doc/examples issue - I think it's good to have them in the package's %doc section, but I understand Ville's point. If anyone has a better solution, speak up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 05:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120548.m1C5mL3q008453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-12 00:48 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-0.29-0.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican.spec * Tue Feb 12 2008 Jeff Fearn 0.29-0 - Setup per Brand Book_Templates - Fix soure and URL paths - Use release in source path - correct GPL version text and changed file name to COPYING - dropped Provides - reordered spec file - added fdl.txt to tar ball. - added fdl.txt to doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 05:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120551.m1C5pwAK030590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-12 00:51 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-fedora-0.8-0.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/publican-fedora.spec - Setup per Brand Book_Templates - Fix soure and URL paths - Use release in source path - add OPL text as COPYING - removed coreutils reqq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 06:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120618.m1C6I8vZ002601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 01:18 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=417542 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 555b3f13d9c52f7202bafd18810e2dc8 VCS-LibCVS-1.0002.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test output is t/lcvs-st.... Creating test repository, please be patient:................done ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=111, 96 wallclock secs ( 4.47 cusr + 1.53 csys = 6.00 CPU) + Package perl-VCS-LibCVS-1.0002-2.fc9 -> Provides: perl(VCS::LibCVS) = 1.0002 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Admin) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Branch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::CvsPass) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Ext) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Local) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Pserver) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::LoggingIOHandle) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Argument) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ArgumentUsingRequest) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ArgumentUsingRequests) = 1.0002-2.fc9 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Case) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Checkin_time) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Directory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Entry) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Is_modified) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Modified) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Questionable) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Requests) = 1.0002-2.fc9 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Root) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Sticky) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Unchanged) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::UseUnchanged) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Valid_responses) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::add) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::annotate) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ci) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::co) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::diff) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::export) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::history) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::init) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::log) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::noop) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::rdiff) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::remove) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::rlog) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::status) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::tag) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::update) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::valid_requests) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::version) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Checked_in) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Clear_sticky) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Copy_file) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Created) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::E) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdateModifyingResponse) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdateModifyingResponses) = 1.0002-2.fc9 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdatingResponse) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdatingResponses) = 1.0002-2.fc9 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::M) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Mbinary) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Merged) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Mod_time) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Mode) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::New_entry) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Patched) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Remove_entry) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Removed) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Responses) = 1.0002-2.fc9 perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Set_sticky) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Update_existing) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Updated) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Valid_requests) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::error) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::ok) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Command) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::DirectoryName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Entry) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileContents) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileMode) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::LogMessage) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::PathName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::RevisionNumber) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Root) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::String) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::TagSpec) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Time) perl(VCS::LibCVS::DirectoryBranch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::FileBranch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::FileRevision) perl(VCS::LibCVS::IgnoreChecker) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Repository) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryFile) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryFileOrDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Slice) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingFile) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingFileOrDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingUnmanagedFile) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Spec::Unix) perl(FileHandle) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::Dir) perl(IO::File) perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(IPC::Open2) perl(Time::Local) perl(VCS::LibCVS) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Admin) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Branch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::CvsPass) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Ext) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Local) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Connection::Pserver) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::LoggingIOHandle) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Argument) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ArgumentUsingRequests) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Requests) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdateModifyingResponses) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdatingResponses) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Responses) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Command) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::DirectoryName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Entry) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileContents) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileMode) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::FileName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::LogMessage) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::PathName) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::RevisionNumber) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Root) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::String) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::TagSpec) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Datum::Time) perl(VCS::LibCVS::DirectoryBranch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::FileBranch) perl(VCS::LibCVS::FileRevision) perl(VCS::LibCVS::IgnoreChecker) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Repository) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryFile) perl(VCS::LibCVS::RepositoryFileOrDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::Slice) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingFile) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingFileOrDirectory) perl(VCS::LibCVS::WorkingUnmanagedFile) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 06:39:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120639.m1C6dofm016632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-02-12 01:39 EST ------- Took me a bit longer than I was hoping, but here's a new revision: http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala-2.6.1-8.fc8.src.rpm http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala.spec * Mon Feb 11 2008 Geoff Reedy - 2.6.1-8 - Adhere more strongly to the emacs package guidelines - Include some comments regarding the boot-strapping process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 06:47:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120647.m1C6l7md007562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 01:47 EST ------- Thanks > - Use release in source path I don't really like this. If you want to use subminor versioning that is fine. You can version how you like upstream, but moving the "release" number there just makes things more complicated for fedora and other distros when packaging. > - added fdl.txt to tar ball. > - added fdl.txt to doc package It would be better to upcase the filename, IMHO. How about just using COPYING.FDL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 06:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120649.m1C6nUsr018116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 01:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294631) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294631&action=view) publican.spec-3.patch Please use the desktop scriptslets from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef Otherwise I think the package looks ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 07:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120748.m1C7m9Fm027391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 02:48 EST ------- Also: [Desktop Entry] Name=Publican Comment=How to use Publican Exec=htmlview /usr/share/doc/publican-0.29/en-US/index.html Requires: htmlview should be added to -doc subpackage? (by the way this should be replaced by xdg-open?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 07:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120745.m1C7jgmO027024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 02:45 EST ------- Well, I have not read the whole comments of this bug yet, but: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e 's|@@FILE@@|%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/en-US/index.html|' %{name}.desktop sed -i -e 's|@@ICON@@|%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/en-US/images/icon.svg|' %{name}.desktop -------------------------------------------------------------------------- What html and svg files this sed command points to? %{name} is expanded to "publican", not "publican-doc". As far as I checked the rebuild rpms, the files under %_docdir/%name-%version are onlhy 3 files, COPYING, README, fdl.txt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 08:23:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120823.m1C8NEOa022738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-02-12 03:23 EST ------- Ville Skytt?, i really dont think they should be merge and for good reasons. html401-dtds is SGML data, to be processed with SGML tools and linked locally with SGML catalogs. xhtml1-dtds is XML data, using namespaces so not interpreted correctly by SGML processing tools, to be used with XML processing tools and linked locally with XML catalogs. Can you explain what you meant by: - Register to SGML catalogs in addition to XML. - Various XML cataloguing improvements There have been long debates in that field, i really don't want to wake up the sleeping dragons, but really want stuff to keep working! Different kind of data, different kind of requirement, different kind of usages, really merging those does not make sense at all. And the 'html' pattern in the name is not a good technical reason for doing that merge. So I don't understand why you though it was a good idea in the first place, could you explain ? And please fix the xhtml1-dtds spec file if you want but keep it separate ! Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 09:27:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120927.m1C9Rvq3012692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 04:27 EST ------- waf-1.3.2-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 09:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802120929.m1C9TSHX002607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 04:29 EST ------- waf-1.3.2-5.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 11:37:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit-1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions SRPM & RPMs pass rpmlint. OCaml review policy is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/OCaml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 11:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121138.m1CBcJtS025256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |cryptographic and hash | |functions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 11:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253564] Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121158.m1CBwdW9006881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 06:58 EST ------- Try that again ... Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile-0.7.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 11:58:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253564] Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121158.m1CBw4rQ006803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 06:58 EST ------- Yes, that seems to be a missing camlp4 dep. Added (see below). *.opt are stripped manually because they are built with symbols by the OCaml compiler (which isn't gcc so behaves differently from however gcc works -- does gcc automatically strip binaries?). Debian ship the data in a package called libcamomile-ocaml-data (http://packages.debian.org/etch-m68k/libcamomile-ocaml-dev) which is free and under LGPL 2.1. *.opt is a standard extension for native code OCaml binaries. Sometimes they are renamed as just foo, sometimes left as foo.opt. I've renamed them now. Here's my updated package: Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camomile-0.7.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Camomile is the main Unicode library for OCaml. * Tue Feb 12 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.7.1-2 - Added BR ocaml-camlp4-devel. - Rename /usr/bin/*.opt as /usr/bin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121202.m1CC2u4F008080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(iphands at yahoo.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 07:02 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:01:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428000] Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121201.m1CC1fmw007789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428000 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-dbus Short Description: OCaml library for using D-Bus Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121203.m1CC3WvB029639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 07:03 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121204.m1CC4otJ029789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(alex at tvtransilvani | |a.ro) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 07:04 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121211.m1CCBk1k031269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 07:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294647) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294647&action=view) spec cleanup You can use attached patch to solve packaging issues. Add changelog and bump release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121212.m1CCC1Hn009687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:12 EST ------- I'm very happy to go with Stijn's updated version. Those *.opt files are native binaries and in this case are necessary and cannot be renamed. However they can be stripped. Updated SRPM, which includes Stijn's changes and strips the opt files: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5-5.04-2.fc8.src.rpm This version passes rpmlint for the SRPMs and RPMs, except for the bogus warning about ./configure missing --libdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:10:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121210.m1CCAI1C009462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jmoskovc at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 07:10 EST ------- 1)rpmlint on current rawhide package gave me usbutils.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/usbutils-0.73-1.src.rpm.10603/usbutils.spec ==> use iconv command to convert spec file to UTF8 format iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 usbutils.spec >usbutils.spec.new mv usbutils.spec.new usbutils.spec usbutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Linux USB utilities. ==> remove dot from summary usbutils.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog usbutils.src: W: invalid-license GPL ==> use GPLv2+ 2) You can add dist tag if you want http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag 3)you can use parallel make as make %{?_smp_mflags} 4)Remove generic INSTALL from %doc 5) Do not use %makeinstall -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:15:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241654] Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121215.m1CCFKwk010367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipcalculator - A utility for computing broadcast, network, mask, and host ranges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241654 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:15 EST ------- Built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=418486 Patrice, Manuel, Marek - thanks for the work done on this review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:28:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121228.m1CCS91T012359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbhalera at redhat.com AssignedTo|smohan at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review-, |fedora-review? |needinfo?(roozbeh at farsiweb.i| |nfo) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 07:28 EST ------- looks like a stalled review. Taking ownership of this review and CC'ing to rbhalera who is new maintainer for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121231.m1CCVPin013056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:31 EST ------- There was also a missing BR on pcre-devel and ocaml-pcre-devel. New version fixes those: Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp-1.2.0test1-4.fc8.src.rpm * Tue Feb 12 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.2.0test1-4 - Added BR ocaml-pcre-devel, pcre-devel * Thu Sep 13 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.2.0test1-3 - ExcludeArch ppc64 NB. The remaining rpmlint warnings are all bogus because it doesn't know that *.cmi and *.cma files are really binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121239.m1CCdJWr014238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:39 EST ------- This is the updated package: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cil-1.3.6-4.fc8.src.rpm * Wed Nov 7 2007 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.3.6-4 - ExcludeArch ppc - CIL doesn't build on PPC as it turns out. The *.ml files are required. We can't strip cilly.byte.exe because strip will remove the bytecode from the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121242.m1CCgkON004098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:42 EST ------- I've just rechecked and this still builds. Any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121241.m1CCf8TZ003882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 jmoskovc at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(jmoskovc at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:41 EST ------- Hi, thanks for the patch, I've commited the proposed changes to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121249.m1CCnVEq005294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:49 EST ------- Right URLs this time ... Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-2.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 12:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121249.m1CCn9x5005216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-12 07:49 EST ------- Yes I agree. I've changed it so that it builds into a subdirectory ('tmp/') under the build directory. Here is an updated SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-2.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils.spec This also adds the missing build dep on ocaml-camlp4-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121317.m1CDHQOC021750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-12 08:17 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294656) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294656&action=view) EL-5 mock build log files Need this package for a local build system environment, it builds for EL-5 as well: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/el5/i386/python-bugzilla-0.2-4.el5.noarch.rpm (Mock build log files attached) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121335.m1CDZESY025198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 08:35 EST ------- Sorry, I didn't get you. If this package is already built for EL-5 then you may like to close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121350.m1CDoeVI017218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-12 08:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kiconedit Short Description: A icon editor for KDE 4 Owners: svahl,than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121349.m1CDnjUg016623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-12 08:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kcoloredit Short Description: A color palette Editor for KDE 4 Owners: svahl,than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121354.m1CDsSwo017621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-12 08:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-VCS-LibCVS Short Description: Access CVS working directories and repositories Owners: rnorwood Branches: devel InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 13:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121355.m1CDt1c1028926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 14:00:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:00:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121400.m1CE0MXq030401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(wwoods at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 09:00 EST ------- Strange last time I looked at http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/SRPMS/ I didn't find this package appearing in public repo. But yes I do have checked logs already but not sure whether build got some problem or something else happened. Now I can see this package in repo. CLOSING this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 14:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121414.m1CEEH5t021764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-12 09:14 EST ------- This is an unofficial review, I can't approve your package or sponsor you. [+] rpmlint is silent [+] the package build in mock [-] don't use %define for name, version and release [-] the URL:http://mips.edu.ms/evo/index.php/Report_as_Spam doesn't seem to be related with this program. [-] the recommended value for the BuildRoot is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 14:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241052] Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121434.m1CEYhSS025609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-Matrix - R module, Classes etc. for dense and sparse matrices and matrix ops https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 tom at moertel.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 14:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121440.m1CEeijL006192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 09:40 EST ------- Thanks for quick work. 1) But, I think patch did not solved following issues usbutils.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/usbutils-0.73-2.fc9.src.rpm.9287/usbutils.spec usbutils.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog solution==> iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 usbutils.spec >usbutils.spec.new mv usbutils.spec.new usbutils.spec 2) remove following line from SPEC cp /usr/share/libtool/config.{sub,guess} . as you already have BR: libtool I got successful scratch build with above changes at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=418904 3)Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-usb/%{name}-{version}.tar.gz 4) change make install line in SPEC to make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ==> This will preserve timestamps. 5) Is following conflict line in SPEC for this package still needed? Conflicts: hotplug < 3:2002_01_14-2 ==> I saw no cvs module for hotplug in Fedora. 6)Also, Can you build this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 14:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121450.m1CEo4Zr029300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-12 09:50 EST ------- > This is an unofficial review, I can't approve your package or sponsor you. Thanks for help. > [-] don't use %define for name, version and release fixed > [-] the URL:http://mips.edu.ms/evo/index.php/Report_as_Spam doesn't seem to be > related with this program. updated to the new url > [-] the recommended value for the BuildRoot > is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 15:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121521.m1CFLrNa014576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 10:21 EST ------- For 2.0-3: * SourceURL - The correct one seems: http://threadingbuildingblocks.org/uploads/77/84/2.0/%{sourcefilename} ^^^^^ * Timestamps - Please also change the following line (-p option needed) ----------------------------------------------------------- cp %{SOURCE2} %{SOURCE3} %{SOURCE4} %{SOURCE5} . ----------------------------------------------------------- Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (tbb) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 15:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121535.m1CFZhGf005933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2008-02-12 10:35 EST ------- Spec file fixed and converted. I'm not sure about hotplug, you can still install it from other repository, so even if it's not in official Fedora repo the conflict still exists.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 15:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121538.m1CFcUM2018049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2008-02-12 10:38 EST ------- Just finished the scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo? taskID=419085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 16:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] New: nss-mdns for EPEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nss-mdns New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: lkundrak Volunteering to take this in EPEL, builds just fine there. I was not able to find the original review requiest, but the spec file seems quite sane, like properly reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 16:07:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:07:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121607.m1CG7qWu024263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 16:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121635.m1CGZg38018005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-12 11:35 EST ------- Ivana, Apologies if I told you that zlib should be under the BSD license. Zlib has its own license, you can use License: zlib for the spec file here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 16:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 11:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121636.m1CGaJeq029988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 11:36 EST ------- looks Ok to me. I will wait for build in devel then will Approve this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:09:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121709.m1CH9gf4003420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-12 12:09 EST ------- There's a new release out, with new data, which seems to be making an effort at legality. :) Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift-20071226-1.src.rpm Still needs a lot of work, but I've made some basic corrections. I've updated the vdrift-data-minimal bug as well, renaming it just vdrift-data, since it's all one set now. It now needs and bundles the bullet library, which might be wise to split out and package seperately. If all concur, I will do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:09:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:09:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121709.m1CH9dJp024248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: vdrift-data-|Review Request: vdrift-data |minimal - VDrift minimal |- VDrift data set |data set | ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-12 12:09 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift-data/vdrift-data.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrfit-data/vdrift-data-20071226-1.src.rpm Updated version, see 234490. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427824] Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121720.m1CHKomb005846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427824 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2008-02-12 12:20 EST ------- New Spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko-0.7-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm This new 0.7rc1 removes the glibmm copy that was shipped in the package and tmispell-voikko now uses the glibmm library in the system. I have tested that this package builds with mock in F-8 and Rawhide. It also works in F-8 for me (and I see no reason for it not working on Rawhide). Basically the only issue with this package now should be the curses interface UTF-8 problem, but it's not severe and if upstream fixes it, I'll update the Fedora package. I hope dropping the glibmm copy makes this package a bit less daunting to review ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121737.m1CHb4Fl008919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428000] Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121740.m1CHeXh2030128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428000 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121739.m1CHdMAS029548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. Why have cvsextras commits: no? Any particular reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:42:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:42:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121742.m1CHgKjV010027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121743.m1CHhapT030598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121748.m1CHmYhB011374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2008-02-12 12:48 EST ------- Thanks for the cvs. I just copied and pasted a template from my original package. I don't remember the original reason. I doesn't bother me either way. Its probably the SA in me saying deny by default. Is there a way to easily turn it on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121749.m1CHnU8C011449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 12:49 EST ------- The review bug is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 Have you checked to see if the fedora maintainer would like to maintain this in EPEL first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 17:55:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121755.m1CHtVdR013007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-12 12:55 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/pic2aa/pic2aa-0.2.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121809.m1CI9P9R015680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121814.m1CIEPUH016536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-12 13:14 EST ------- Kevin: I did not. Adding him to Cc. Lennart -- would you mind if I maintained this package in EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121818.m1CII0XE004515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-12 13:17 EST ------- Validating XHTML 1.0 docs works with OpenSP (and thus the W3C markup validator; not only in the Fedora package but upstream W3C production instances as well) if the DTDs are in SGML catalogs. Note also that upstream ships a SGML declaration for XHTML 1.0 in their tarball. Off the top of my head, various XML cataloguing improvements includes at least tightening up public ID matching, registration of entity files separately for reuse by other specifications, providing an unversioned xhtml-dtds catalog in an obvious place (/etc/xml) for cases where only the XHTML 1.0 DTDs are needed instead of the whole catalog, keeping the system root catalog clean by inserting just one nextCatalog entry there etc. As said, I've made these changes a long time ago in a local package so I don't remember all the details. I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean by "please fix the xhtml1-dtds spec file if you want but keep it separate". Which fixes would you find acceptable? Keep it separate from what? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121823.m1CINgr3005571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-12 13:23 EST ------- Sure, you can go to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/wipe and check the 'group members can commit' checkbox. Please do. It will allow other maintainers to assist you or fix bugs if you are unavailable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121831.m1CIVmo9020128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ssalevan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(ssalevan at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From ssalevan at redhat.com 2008-02-12 13:31 EST ------- Pong... I apologize for the delay; schoolwork's been dominating my life as of late. I should have a new spec up by this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:37:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121837.m1CIbEwY008478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-12 13:37 EST ------- Built - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=419505 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121847.m1CIllZT010337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 18:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] New: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen-5.9.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: AutoGen is a tool designed to simplify the creation and maintenance of programs that contain large amounts of repetitious text. It is especially valuable in programs that have several blocks of text that must be kept synchronised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 19:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121903.m1CJ3LMM013510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-12 14:03 EST ------- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=419598 I inherited this package from Paul F. Johnson few days back. Since this was last updated a year ago, I would like to pass this through a review. Important changes: + Package split into autogen, libopts, and libopts-devel to avoid multiple licensing scenario -- AutoOpts (or libopts) is BSD or LGPLv3+; while the rest of AutoGen is GPLv3+ with some portions being GPLv2+. AutoGen's GPLv2+ portions are being redistributed as GPLv3+. Debian also has a similar breakup. + Dropped 'Obsoletes: libopts ...' because the libopts source package was retired and superseded by autogen during FC-5 and according to the Naming Guidelines they should not be carried any further. What should be done to smoothen the change caused by the splitting of autogen as stated above? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 19:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802121906.m1CJ6FiW027253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-12 14:06 EST ------- Bumping priority because: + This was never built on PPC64 for no particular reason, it seems. + Prevents packages like Anjuta from getting built for PPC64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122000.m1CK08iH023970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-12 15:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Bumping priority because: > > + This was never built on PPC64 for no particular reason, it seems. There was a bug on ppc64 (not sure if it is really resolved: bug 249138) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:07:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122007.m1CK7BWn006273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-12 15:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #56) > There's a new release out, with new data, which seems to be making an effort at > legality. :) > Why do you say "an effort" they seem to have done a full audit, atelast judging from: http://vdrift.net/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=6896 They seem. Sure they may have missed something, is there anything troublesome you know about still in there? > It now needs and bundles the bullet library, which might be wise to split out > and package seperately. If all concur, I will do that. Yes package bullet seperate please, using pristine sources from upstream: http://www.bulletphysics.com/ I will happy to review all 3 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122023.m1CKN3LI028057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-12 15:23 EST ------- Sorry, I tend to understate. A habit I picked up from a college history textbook, entitled "Problems in Western Civilisation", with a picture of Hitler on the cover. :) I applaud the "effort", it must have been a great deal of work. I'll get bullet packaged and submitted, then post it here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122048.m1CKm2D3000597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From thelusiv at gmail.com 2008-02-12 15:48 EST ------- Hi guys, it's me again, from the VDrift team. Don't bother building a Bullet package from pristine upstream sources, this will not work for VDrift. There's a reason why we include the Bullet source with the VDrift source, we are using a development version with some patches we've applied. I think there were some performance issues with the ray-casting in the Bullet release and we had to go to the developers to get this fixed. Also, there wasn't a great deal of work involved in the tracks. The tracks that made it into the last release were just community-created tracks for other games, which we found the authors of and obtained permission to use them. We have started work on some original tracks, but these are not yet finished, so they have not been included yet. These include a hillclimb style track ("Indian Hill" in our data repository), an off-road rally track, a new version of Zandvoort, and Carolina Motorsports Park. These last three are not yet available for testing, and Indian Hill needs further work to increase drivability, and add landscape/scenery objects. Also, we plan to eventually create an application to go with VDrift to allow the user to select and download data on their own, so that little or no data needs to be distributed with the game. This will fix the package license issue once and for all, but work on this has stalled for the time being. Feel free to email me or post on our forums if you have any questions. I'm monitoring these bug reports so I will watch for updates. Thanks for your effort in packaging VDrift for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:54:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122054.m1CKsxZK001748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-02-12 15:54 EST ------- hm...new release of Ocaml seem to be required. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=419865&name=build.log Already built it on builders ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 20:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122059.m1CKxfoE015924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-12 15:59 EST ------- Thanks for the information, Chris, and thanks to you and your team for the effort between 3-23 and 12-26. Fedora folken, should we bundle bullet into vdrift, or possibly package a pristine bullet with a bullet-vdrift subpackage with the vdrift patches applied, so that vdrift can BT bullet-vdrift-devel and other packages could BR bullet-devel? Am I crazy, or is this a good idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 22:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:18:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122218.m1CMIDuT018691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-12 17:18 EST ------- Successfully builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=419964 Updated spec and SRPM: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-5.f8.src.rpm http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 23:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122300.m1CN0VkL005954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 18:00 EST ------- Already, please review SPEC: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/mybashburn/mybashburn.spec SRPMS: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/mybashburn/SRPMS/mybashburn-1.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm RPMS: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/mybashburn/RPMS/mybashburn-1.0.2-3.fc8.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 23:09:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122309.m1CN9aa2027186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-12 18:09 EST ------- I got great service from the Fedora infrastructure team, so there are new urls for this project. Sorry if this blocked anyone from checking things out. http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican-0.29-1.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican.spec - removed %%post and %%postun as update-desktop-database is for desktop files with mime types - removed release for source path and tar name - fixed package name in desktop file to include -doc - switched from htmlview to xdg-open - Added xdg-utils requires for doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 12 23:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802122318.m1CNIdF5008951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2008-02-12 18:18 EST ------- Hi, if you do not need to be sponsored, I would like to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 00:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:07:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427824] Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130007.m1D07poV003960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427824 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2008-02-12 19:07 EST ------- New Spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko-0.7-0.2.rc2.fc8.src.rpm This new version uses ncursesw instead of ncurses, so the UTF-8 problem I first mentioned in comment #2 is fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 00:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130052.m1D0qZOF023176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 19:52 EST ------- Thanks for the update, Jeff. For the record here is the rpmlint output now: publican.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 86, tab: line 1) which you may want to fix before importing to cvs, and: publican.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt publican.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided documentation-devel which are ok. (BTW I filed a bug to have po2xml moved from kdesdk to a separate subpackage to avoid the huge dependency on kdesdk.) Updating the remaining MUST items from the review in comment 87: [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source 8e3b3709c1daad154be9759a6c8ee443 publican-0.29.tgz [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. So AFAICT all review MUST items are now satisfied, and all the major points raised have been addressed I think. I am not a license lawyer obviously, but the licensing seems reasonable enough to me - if there should still be issues with the interactions of the licenses I hope they can be ironed out later if necessary. Thanks for the review. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 01:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130131.m1D1VEGS029673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 20:31 EST ------- Updated urls are: Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican-fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican-fedora-0.8-0.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130204.m1D24ZYa021263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 iphands at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(iphands at yahoo.com)| ------- Additional Comments From iphands at yahoo.com 2008-02-12 21:04 EST ------- Added a patch for configure... dzcomm-0.9.9i-2.fc8.src.rpm. All good? Thanks, -Ian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130212.m1D2CsE0022596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 21:12 EST ------- rpmlint says: publican-fedora.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes documentation-devel-Fedora This is ok, but probably it can be dropped assuming there aren't many people using the old package. publican-fedora.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License The Fedora short license name is "Open Publication": see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-7c329132fff48be993272795da69b49c7812e8a9 A few comments: publican-0.29/Book_Template/en-US/ and publican-fedora-0.8/Book_Template/en-US are the same, but presumably they are duplicated because they are under different licenses, right? The README file says "for building Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux documentation". It would be valuable to get comments on this package from the Fedora Docs project since I am not really qualified to evaluate the templates, etc. Otherwise the package basically looks ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:26:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:26:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130226.m1D2QV14005479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-12 21:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: publican Short Description: publication tool chain Owners: jfearn Branches: devel F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdious Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130239.m1D2dVeA026380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+, | |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 21:39 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] New: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ffsb/ffsb.spec SRPM URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/ffsb/ffsb-5.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark (FFSB) is a cross-platform filesystem performance measurement tool. It uses customizable profiles to measure of different workloads, and it supports multiple groups of threads across multiple filesystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130249.m1D2nBkQ028010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 21:49 EST ------- Note this package requires ghc-X11 which is not yet in Fedora, but see bug 351361. BTW I have some (newer) packages which I made independently (probably need some cleanup for Fedora): http://haskell.org/fedora/haskell/SRPMS/xmonad-0.6-1.src.rpm http://haskell.org/fedora/haskell/SRPMS/ghc-X11-1.4.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:52:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130252.m1D2qW89009644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-12 21:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint says: > > publican-fedora.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes > documentation-devel-Fedora > > This is ok, but probably it can be dropped assuming there aren't many people > using the old package. > > publican-fedora.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License > > The Fedora short license name is "Open Publication": see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-7c329132fff48be993272795da69b49c7812e8a9 Fixed. > A few comments: > > publican-0.29/Book_Template/en-US/ and publican-fedora-0.8/Book_Template/en-US > are the same, but presumably they are duplicated because they are under > different licenses, right? This is correct. > The README file says "for building Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux documentation". Changed to Fedora. > It would be valuable to get comments on this package from the Fedora Docs project > since I am not really qualified to evaluate the templates, etc. It's pretty hard for the Fedora docs team to comment on this since they can't actually use the system until it's in Fedora. I'm sure once it is in there and they can play with it a bit, they will have a bunch of changes to the look and feel, and the common content. In fact I'm hoping they will want to take over this package :) I don't think the content needs to be exact since no Fedora documentation uses this system yet. > Otherwise the package basically looks ok to me. http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican-fedora-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/publican/trunk/Files/publican-fedora.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 02:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130256.m1D2uMvs029354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130305.m1D35w5G012329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:05 EST ------- I guess the naming guidelines need to be fleshed out/discussed on the coming fedora-haskell-list but the name of the srpm and the spec file must coincide anyway. Given this is a library, ghc-xmonad-contrib is probably right anyway. (FWIW I made a package too the other day at home, but forgot to upload it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130307.m1D37bwx012608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell bindings to the Xft, X Free Type interface library, and some Xrender parts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc681-x11- |Review Request: ghc-X11-xft |xft - Haskell bindings to |- Haskell bindings to the |the Xft, X Free Type |Xft, X Free Type interface |interface library, and some |library, and some Xrender |Xrender parts |parts ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:07 EST ------- The name should be ghc-X11-xft IMHO, following the upstream naming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:08:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130308.m1D38ZR9031562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ghc681-utf8-|Review Request: ghc-utf8- |string - Support reading and|string - Support reading and |writing UTF8 Strings |writing UTF8 Strings ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:08 EST ------- Name of the spec and srpm must coincide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130310.m1D3Ar7Q013247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: ghc681-zlib |Review Request: ghc-zlib - |- zlib bindings for ghc |zlib bindings for ghc |6.8.1 | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:10 EST ------- Base package name should be ghc-zlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:13:13 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130313.m1D3DDWN013567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:13 EST ------- Bugzilla can't handle the name, at least it doesn't display it correctly for me, but as "? ? c o l i e r" (adding spaces for emphasis). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130339.m1D3dVHa004592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 22:39 EST ------- oops. I changed flag to fedora-review+ before koji build finishes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130342.m1D3gEDl005328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130338.m1D3cVTQ004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 22:38 EST ------- + is OK - is Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=421570 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. b58c515d990886cab69b7d9b726536cd ffsb-5.2.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. - Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: 1)Use macros in %files section also. use %{_bindir} 2)you can use defattr as defattr(-,root,root,-) I am waiting for koji build to finish to see it builds on all archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 03:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130359.m1D3xUwV008648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:59 EST ------- > 1)Use macros in %files section also. use %{_bindir} oops meant to; quickly put in /usr/bin/ because I couldn't remember the macro name :) Will fix those up. Thanks! -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130402.m1D42LCn023102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 23:02 EST ------- updated files posted at same urls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130418.m1D4IvAa025641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 23:18 EST ------- Koji was sad but now building: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=421883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130431.m1D4Vnfu027823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-12 23:31 EST ------- Ah nevermind I see ghc-X11 in bug 426751. So I think this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:52:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430351] Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130452.m1D4qMRH017889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430351 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 23:52 EST ------- libgee-0.1.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130453.m1D4r2XC031650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 23:53 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130451.m1D4pqVr031441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 23:51 EST ------- python-libgmail-docs-0.3-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:52:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430351] Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130452.m1D4qQCY031552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430351 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.1.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130451.m1D4pshD031481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.3-6.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130453.m1D4r4eu018051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130459.m1D4x1lo000963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-12 23:59 EST ------- thanks for the build APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130456.m1D4udjt000483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-12 23:56 EST ------- php-pear-HTTP-Upload-0.9.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 04:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130456.m1D4ug7I000527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430351] Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130505.m1D55UAS022553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgee - GObject collection library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430351 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:05 EST ------- libgee-0.1.1-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130505.m1D55AEW022251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:05 EST ------- php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper-0.9.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:06:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130506.m1D563bf022636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.1b-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130505.m1D55CDX022287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.9.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130506.m1D56Ork022707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 00:06 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ffsb Short Description: The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark Owners: sandeen Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130506.m1D5612B003603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:06 EST ------- vamp-plugin-sdk-1.1b-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431290] Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130508.m1D58JbL023193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qosmic - A cosmic recursive fractal flame editor written in Qt4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431290 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:08 EST ------- qosmic-1.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422831] Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130511.m1D5BaYm024175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:11 EST ------- python-libgmail-0.1.8-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:11:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422831] Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130511.m1D5BdRS024209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.1.8-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:11:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429084] Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130511.m1D5BA0F005325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:11 EST ------- vamp-plugin-sdk-1.1b-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130511.m1D5Bj4D005406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-13 00:11 EST ------- >> + This was never built on PPC64 for no particular reason, it seems. > There was a bug on ppc64 (not sure if it is really resolved: > bug 249138) Looks like that was due to a build failure. However that was quite a few releases back with autogen-5.8.9, and the latest release builds fine on PPC64. Strangely there is no ExcludeArch in the Spec for PPC64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130517.m1D5HQmC026138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:17 EST ------- python-libgmail-docs-0.3-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422831] Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130516.m1D5GQEs007204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail - Library to provide access to Gmail via Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422831 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 00:16 EST ------- python-libgmail-0.1.8-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130522.m1D5M1ku027608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:18:41 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130518.m1D5IfHh026646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-13 00:18 EST ------- OK, I realize we have leak in the FPG, people seem to be keen to exploit. IMHO, this package name should be rejected, because a) It technically means asking for trouble wrt. tools processing rpms/rpm-spec (rpmbuild, rpm, yum, apt, yumex, createrepo, db-formats etc.). I am sure at least some of them are not able to process such names. b) It is user unfriendly: You can't expect people to be able to type "arbitrary exotic characters" on their keyboard. The crucial point about this is "exotic is relative": Europeans might be able to type "??", but how would Westerners feel about Middle/Far East chars being used in package names? That said, I am inclined to propose restricting package names to using printable chars from 7bit ASCII to the FPG - I never would have expected this to be necessary, but ... seems like this is inevitable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130537.m1D5bhQQ011038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell- | |list at redhat.com, | |petersen at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: ghc681-x11 -|Review Request: ghc-X11 - A |A Haskell binding to the X11|Haskell binding to the X11 |graphics library. |graphics library. ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 00:37 EST ------- IMHO we should follow the upstream naming and use "X11" not "x11". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130547.m1D5lxSG031720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:47:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130547.m1D5lxR6031753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |426754 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130554.m1D5sR5W013865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 00:54 EST ------- Is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130550.m1D5omba013487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130550.m1D5oZxP013437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-X11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130550.m1D5onGN013523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. Alias: ghc-X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |426753 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 05:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130555.m1D5tAIe000699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 00:55 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130701.m1D71apB025091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com, | |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 02:01 EST ------- spot and nim-nim, Can you please help me to know legality of this package and its license name? Are Lucida fonts acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130707.m1D77Ibk026165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 02:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422141 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 8c0431aa6521f6abc55459cb9d6e70f8 pic2aa-0.2.1.tar.gz d3b0b6f745e6137bd6fb54164e284dcf shot1.png + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. Should: Issue 1 from comment #1 still exists. Fix that. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:17:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130717.m1D7H7XY027770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 02:17 EST ------- Jeff imported and build the package for development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:17:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130717.m1D7H9kV027847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 Bug 427482 depends on bug 427481, which changed state. Bug 427481 Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130719.m1D7JqDN028033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |publican -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130721.m1D7LUBm028689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 02:21 EST ------- I think it would be better to change the package Group from "Applications/Text" to something else like "Development/Libraries". I am not sure if there is a more appropriate group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:37:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130737.m1D7boCN031049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 02:37 EST ------- While reviewing publican-fedora, I realised it looks like publican should own "%dir /usr/share/publican/Templates/" too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 07:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:47:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130747.m1D7lhJZ032643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 02:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #109) > While reviewing publican-fedora, I realised it looks like publican should > own "%dir /usr/share/publican/Templates/" too. Sorry nevermind, it does: I was looking at an older publican package I had installed here. It's all good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130818.m1D8I2Co024045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-13 03:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #60) > Thanks for the information, Chris, and thanks to you and your team for the > effort between 3-23 and 12-26. > > Fedora folken, should we bundle bullet into vdrift, or possibly package a > pristine bullet with a bullet-vdrift subpackage with the vdrift patches applied, > so that vdrift can BT bullet-vdrift-devel and other packages could BR bullet-devel? > > Am I crazy, or is this a good idea? It all depends. Do the patches change ABI / API, are they heading upstream, etc. I've gone this way before, that is I've packed a bundled patched library separately before including the patches in the separate build, there this could be done because the patches we're only bugfixes, so no ABI / API changes (note that additions are fine, changes are the problem). However since that lib's upstream was dead, the app including the library was effectively maintaining it for their own uses and each new release of the application I had todo a new release of the lib, so I eventually stopped doing this. So I say since its modified (for good reasons), just use the included version. Chris (Guirl) have your bullet patches been submitted upstream? Are there any plans to get them upstream and eventually switch to using a pristine bullet again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130824.m1D8OdFA006135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-13 03:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > It's pretty hard for the Fedora docs team to comment on this since they can't > actually use the system until it's in Fedora. > > I'm sure once it is in there and they can play with it a bit, they will have a > bunch of changes to the look and feel, and the common content. In fact I'm > hoping they will want to take over this package :) +1 That was the plan; no need to slow the packaging process down for looking down at that level. Once it's a package, then we can commence to arguing stuff with the upstream, like, "Can you switch everything to uses dashes '-' instead of underscores '_'?" I kid!! Actually, I've looked a bit at the source and have seen this system on-and-off over the years, and haven't seen any surprises. Using it for Fedora Docs is going to mean some potential modifications to the source XML (file names, other conventions), but that is expected. I reckon stuff will build with just a little fiddling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130833.m1D8Xce0007587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From varekova at redhat.com 2008-02-13 03:33 EST ------- Thanks, license tag is fixed in zlib-1.2.3-18.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130834.m1D8Ydst007687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-13 03:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > rpmlint says: > > publican-fedora.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License > > > > The Fedora short license name is "Open Publication": see > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-7c329132fff48be993272795da69b49c7812e8a9 > > Fixed. The legal notice specifies " ... Open Publication License, V1.0 or later ..." My understanding from Red Hat Legal (discussion with Mark Webbink) is that we don't want to use the "or later" language because we don't want to commit to using something that doesn't even exist yet. I'm not sure if this matters. That can exist in the toolchain and not be the same in the doc itself, right? As upstream you have a range of licensing decisions you can make, but since it's actually RHT as the upstream, I recommend this more conservative language. If you like, you can swipe the lingo directly from the Fedora Docs legal notice: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/legalnotice.html http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-legalnotice.html The first is a pointer with set-up, so the set-up lingo matches what the main legal notice page has. The wording on the sn-legalnotice.html is directly from the OPL; the rest is a modified grandchild of the legal notice that used to be in RHEL docs, inherited through the original Fedora days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130850.m1D8o0ln028861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 03:50 EST ------- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. publican-fedora.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes documentation-devel-Fedora publican-fedora.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided documentation-devel-Fedora These are ok. publican-fedora.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.8-1 0.8-2 Please take care of this one. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. [=] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Please remove the redundant Requires(post) and Requires(postun). [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. (But please consider Karsten's comments above.) [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source f0d61bc6d241c57e03c91f40120c0e87 package-review/publican-fedora/publican-fedora-0.8.tgz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. I tested "create_book --brand fedora --name ..." and a few obvious make targets, and it seems to work ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 08:53:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130853.m1D8rkcW029747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 03:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294760) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294760&action=view) publican-fedora.spec-1.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 09:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130900.m1D90fAV012310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 04:00 EST ------- I don't see any other problems with the package, but reviewers, feel free to post additional comments if you should spot anything I might have overlooked. Package is APPROVED, but please address the minor points raised above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 09:38:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130938.m1D9cfEu020180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-13 04:38 EST ------- Ok, to me the package seems good. If you like you can use: find %{buildroot} -name \*\.la -delete instead of: find %{buildroot} -name \*\.la -print | xargs rm -f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 09:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802130943.m1D9hNSS021082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-02-13 04:43 EST ------- Lubomir: Go Ahead, I am happy! Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131002.m1DA2oAT010802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-13 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint on srpm: > > authd.src:7: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pidentd Fixed > authd.src:18: W: prereq-use xinetd Fixed > authd.src: W: no-url-tag See below > authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 That's an intention, it's secret password. > authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key That's an intention, it's zero-length secret password. > authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key That's an intention, do not overwrite the password. > These are OK. > authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown > Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown. Chown is needed, and there *is* full path to /bin/chown. > In addition to needing a URL tag, the Source tag needs a url pointing to the > upstream tarball. If Fedora or RH are upstream, get a space on hosted. I did not find any upstream of authd, did I miss something? If there is not any, I'll go to fedorahosted.org > License tag should be GPLv2+. Fixed > Error in rawhide mock build: Fixed > Other than that, looks good, no other blockers. Thanks for the review! After the fixes (authd-1.4.3-14.rpm), rpmlint complains about: authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: no-url-tag authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown authd.src: W: no-url-tag authd-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag All these errors except url are described above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:41:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131041.m1DAfi6u017672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-13 05:41 EST ------- Thanks! Mamoru : I've added the INSTALL="install -p". New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pigment-python Short Description: Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit Owners: thias Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:47:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432607] New: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432607 Summary: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kmid/kmid.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kmid/kmid-2.0-0.2.20080213.fc8.src.rpm Description: KMid is a midi/karaoke file player, with configurable midi mapper, real Session Management, drag & drop, customizable fonts, etc. It has a very nice interface which let you easily follow the tune while changing the color of the lyrics. It supports output through external synthesizers, AWE, FM and GUS cards. It also has a keyboard view to see the notes played by each instrument. Note for reviewers: kmid has no official release of the KDE4 port yet. So the svn version is packaged here. But it should be as usuable as the KDE 3 version (last change was over one month ago). To create the svn checkout a modified script from upstream was used. There is also existing a short documentation about how to create a new tarball at your own. rpmlint: kmid.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmid/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kmid.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmid/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common kmid-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The first two are normal for KDE packages. For the latter: The tarball doesn't include any development documentation. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432139] Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131051.m1DApgqs019394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kiconedit - An icon editor for KDE4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432139 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 05:51 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432137] Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131051.m1DApINi019319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kcoloredit - A color palette Editor for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432137 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 05:51 EST ------- Imported and built for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=35906 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 10:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131058.m1DAwvGw020643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 Bug 426535 depends on bug 432336, which changed state. Bug 432336 Summary: cstdio missing from gmp-.h https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432336 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 11:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131117.m1DBHMlD024115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-02-13 06:17 EST ------- Okay, my bad I misunderstood your 'sync this up with the html401-dtds package' comment with the idea of merging the two, and really that didn't made sense to me. keeping separate, fixing packaging and improving the XML catalogs sounds just fine to me. I'm also fine with co-ownership, the only touble I ever had with xhtml1-dtds was about the legal question that the licence didn't allowed modification (under the same XHTML name). Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 11:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131119.m1DBJ0fh024242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-13 06:18 EST ------- igraph is done. python-igraph is just waiting for review. I think it's ready. Did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 11:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131150.m1DBoWsZ009757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-13 06:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > * SourceURL Actually both of them are, upstream probably updated the link shortly after I fetched the sources. The old one is still active, but I updated the link to newer version as you suggest. > * Timestamps Fixed. > Other things are okay. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 11:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:53:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131153.m1DBrSvN029536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-13 06:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tbb Short Description: the library that abstracts low-level threading details Owners: pmachata Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 11:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] New: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kgrab/kgrab.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kgrab/kgrab-0.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:08:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131208.m1DC8HAJ032551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131220.m1DCKSFH002210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 07:20 EST ------- I've forgotten the "Requires" in the first version: Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kgrab/kgrab.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/kgrab/kgrab-0.1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Feb 13 2008 Sebastian Vahl - 0.1.1-2 - added requires xdg-utils, kde4-macros(api) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131228.m1DCSGNP003215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 07:28 EST ------- Aha. I just tried to ask same and got Mid-air collision! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131234.m1DCYf12004135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 07:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Aha. I just tried to ask same and got Mid-air collision! Sorry about that. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226031] Merge Review: libieee1284 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131245.m1DCj34b006039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libieee1284 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226031 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-13 07:45 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libieee1284 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:45:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226031] Merge Review: libieee1284 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131245.m1DCjO4Q018383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libieee1284 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226031 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-13 07:45 EST ------- Sorry, please ignore comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432616] Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131253.m1DCrTFg019691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432616 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-13 07:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: international-time New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 12:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432616] New: Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432616 Summary: Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: twaugh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/international-time/international-time.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/international-time/international-time-0.0.2-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a graphical tool for converting a local "wall-clock" time into UTC. This is useful for arranging conference calls where participants from other countries are expected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 13:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131321.m1DDL1gw025257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-13 08:21 EST ------- Fixed in 1.0.37-4.fc9, except for: URL tag: there is no upstream URL for this project, and never has been. Dangling symlink: the devel package requires the main package, which provides the target of this symlink. There are many other packages that do the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 13:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131320.m1DDK9Jm025104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 08:20 EST ------- Damn! Koji took much time for scratch build. I have no idea why build got hung for i386. I assume its koji problem. Anyway its complete now. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422845 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 4f58d536da89abc24ea0a72e0c71d41b kgrab-0.1.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + xdg-utils scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. SHOULD: Like other kiconedit and kcoloredit packages you want to add Requires: kdelibs4 >= %{version} Requires: oxygen-icon-theme APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 13:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131323.m1DDNNfF013211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 08:23 EST ------- You're welcome! > authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown > Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown. Chown is needed, and there *is* full path to /bin/chown. Sorry, I meant full path to chmod, line 59. Otherwise, yes, I'd get a spot on hosted and update with the results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 13:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131352.m1DDqt01018783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 08:52 EST ------- Ok on the symlink. A few of mine do that too. :) As for upstream, you'll need to get a spot on hosted.fp.org, and update this accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 14:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131400.m1DE0sru020507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-13 09:00 EST ------- Not worth the effort -- no new development should be made against alchemist. It is only kept around for the (very few) remaining packages that still use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 14:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131400.m1DE021R019999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 09:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > SHOULD: > Like other kiconedit and kcoloredit packages you want to add > Requires: kdelibs4 >= %{version} > Requires: oxygen-icon-theme > > APPROVED. Thanks! I'll add the requires after the import (with "Requires: kdelibs4 >= 4" not %{version}). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kgrab Short Description: A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 Owners: svahl,than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 14:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131410.m1DEAgO7022794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 09:10 EST ------- Ok, that makes sense. Document that in the Spec, approximately where the URL tag would be, and I'll be happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 14:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131415.m1DEFPYQ023663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 09:15 EST ------- I see that only s-c-httpd and s-c-netboot require this. What is replacing this, that these will be migrating to, just out of curiosity? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 15:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131542.m1DFg3Dd008289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-13 10:42 EST ------- For 2.6.1-8: * Pre-rebuilt binaries - To make it sure that all files to be installed are built from free and legally compatible sources, remove _all_ pre-rebuilt binaries first at %prep like ----------------------------------------------------------- %setup -q -a 2 -n %{name}-%{fullversion} %patch0 -p1 %patch1 -p1 %patch2 -p1 find . -name \*.jar -exec rm {} . \; find . -name \*.dll -exec rm {} . \; ...... ----------------------------------------------------------- * Legal issue - Would you explain how the following files are used to build scala rpm? ----------------------------------------------------------- src/library/scala/collection/immutable/Tree.scala in Source0 ----------------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue ------------------------------------------------------------ /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftdetect/scala.vim vim-scala-2.6.1-8.fc9 file /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftdetect is not owned by any package /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/indent/scala.vim vim-scala-2.6.1-8.fc9 file /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/indent is not owned by any package /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax/scala.vim vim-scala-2.6.1-8.fc9 file /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/syntax is not owned by any package ------------------------------------------------------------ - IMO for now the 3 directories above should be owned by vim-scala (however you may file a bug against vim if you want). * rpmlint ------------------------------------------------------------ ant-scala.noarch: W: no-documentation ant-scala.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ant.d/scala emacs-scala.noarch: E: percent-in-dependency emacs(bin) %{emacs_version} emacs-scala-el.noarch: W: no-documentation emacs-scala-el.noarch: E: percent-in-dependency emacs(bin) %{emacs_version} scala-examples.noarch: W: no-documentation ------------------------------------------------------------ Summary: * Please check where %emacs_version is defined ------------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost scala]$ rpm -q emacs-scala emacs-scala-2.6.1-8.fc9.noarch [tasaka1 at localhost scala]$ rpm -q --requires emacs-scala emacs(bin) >= %{emacs_version} rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 ------------------------------------------------------------ * Timestamps - Please recheck that "-p" option is correctly used when using "cp" or "install" commands to install files. For example, ------------------------------------------------------------- for prog in scaladoc fsc scala scalac; do install -m 755 dists/scala-%{version}/bin/$prog $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} install -m 644 dists/scala-%{version}/man/man1/$prog.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 done ------------------------------------------------------------- * man file - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. * License document - For example, emacs-scala can be installed without scala itself. In this case, no license text of scala is installed, which is undesirable. i.e. All subpackages which don't require ant either directly or indirectly should also have license text as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 15:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131554.m1DFs3cN010139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-13 10:54 EST ------- Still not * Actually this does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422215 * Fedora specific compilation flags are yet not honored. Please recheck the section "Compiler flags" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines You can check what flags are used for Fedora now by `rpm --eval %optflags`. * The installation directory is perhaps wrong. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Installing lib/unix/libdzcom.a to /var/tmp/dz0.9.9i-2.fc9-root-mockbuild/lib -------------------------------------------------------------------- Shared libraries must be installed into %_libdir or /%_lib (in some special cases). On 64 bits this is /usr/lib64, not /usr/lib. Perhaps you want to use %configure macro (In reply to comment #4) > > * BuildRoot does not match Fedora guidelines. > The package has its own root dir in the zipfile... (I don't know the procedure > with this) What do you mean by this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 15:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131556.m1DFuipW022471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-13 10:56 EST ------- Could you explain me what should I fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 15:58:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131558.m1DFwX1c011074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-13 10:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pic2aa Short Description: Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 16:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] New: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/fio/fio.spec SRPM URL: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/fio/fio-1.18-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: fio is an I/O tool that will spawn a number of threads or processes doing a particular type of io action as specified by the user. fio takes a number of global parameters, each inherited by the thread unless otherwise parameters given to them overriding that setting is given. The typical use of fio is to write a job file matching the io load one wants to simulate. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=423559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 16:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131609.m1DG9PO4013376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 11:09 EST ------- Ok. I'll leave it in place in case it's used. What about the perms issue? I can't reproduce it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 16:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131629.m1DGTRje028249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 otaylor at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |otaylor at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2008-02-13 11:29 EST ------- Taking the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 16:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] New: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-car.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/R-car-1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package accompanies J. Fox, An R and S-PLUS Companion to Applied Regression, Sage, 2002. The package contains mostly functions for applied regression, linear models, and generalized linear models, with an emphasis on regression diagnostics, particularly graphical diagnostic methods. There are also some utility functions. With some exceptions, it does not duplicate capabilities in the basic distribution of R, nor in widely used packages. Where relevant, the functions in car are consistent with na.action = na.omit or na.exclude. Required for R-systemfit 1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131708.m1DH81IN024249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 ------- Additional Comments From otaylor at redhat.com 2008-02-13 12:08 EST ------- rpmlint output was empty. What I found going through the package review guidelines and reading the spec file: * UPSTREAM: license needs to be fixed to LGPL (at least for libddm) * UPSTREAM: should have a real tagged and released to gnome.org tarball before this goes into rawhide. * Group: Applications/Internet. Not an application. Maybe 'System Environment/Libraries'? * Summary: and %description need improvement Suggestion: Summary: Engine providing live updates of online data to the desktop %description desktop-data-model provides an engine and client library that allow desktop applications to retrieve data from the online.gnome.org server and elsewhere and get updates when the data changes. This allows creating applications that provide a live display of information from the Internet. * The Requires on GConf for the scriptlets aren't needed. * The handling of the 'version' file isn't ideal ... the version file is used to do an auto-restart of the desktop-data-engine when a new version is installed on the system, so shouldn't be changed until after all the other files are installed. In mugshot.spec we have: %post [...] echo %{version} > %{_datadir}/mugshot/version %files %ghost %{_datadir}/mugshot/version * the -devel package should Requires: pkgconfig for directory ownership. * The Requires on dbus-devel for the -devel subpackage isn't needed. * The devel package shjould require the main package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * The %postun should be changed to '%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig' to avoid an unnecessary shell invocation (the %post would take the same change, but the version change above will add a second line to it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431368] Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131718.m1DHI2qe005557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inconsoleata-fonts - A monospace font, designed for code listings and the like, in print https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431368 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:18 EST ------- Yes indeed. Done and pushed. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131719.m1DHJHsk005752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-13 12:19 EST ------- For 1.5.2-5: * rpm name - First of all, the name of rpm should be pysvn. * pycxx dependency - This package uses pycxx 5.4.0 http://cxx.sourceforge.net/ Please file another review request for pycxx and make pysvn use system-wide pycxx. * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. * Timestamps - When using "install" or "cp" commands, please add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Documents - License text must be included as %doc if it exists. * rpmlint - On i386: ------------------------------------------------------------------ python-svn.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pysvn/_pysvn.so python-svn-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package ------------------------------------------------------------------ This is because _pysvn.so does not have executional permission (the permission of _pysvn.so should be 0755) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131731.m1DHVI0P029124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131737.m1DHbDaf030327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131733.m1DHXDOu029480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131735.m1DHZUax030130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131738.m1DHcehs009831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131740.m1DHefqp031203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:40:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131740.m1DHeGVA010386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 12:40 EST ------- FYI, I'm working on correcting file placement, and generally cleaning up the packages. I have a tad more experience under my belt now than I did when I first created these packages. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:43:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432616] Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131743.m1DHhJBQ031624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: international-time - Convert wall-clock time to UTC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432616 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. No need to file a new review request to do cvsadmin. You can file against the old review bug (without reopening even) or file any new bug against the package and use that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 17:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131755.m1DHtJbK012969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-13 12:55 EST ------- Well, ! Now it build on also rawhide (gmp cstdio bug fixed) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=423054 * When I just type freetalk, it shows: ------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost freetalk]$ freetalk Welcome to freetalk! Running for the first time? Performing some one-time initializations ... Loading dictionary [/usr/share/dict/words]... [479829] words Jabber ID: ------------------------------------------------------- Maybe adding "Requires: words" is useful? Other things seems okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 18:03:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131803.m1DI3FXm014549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 shenson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From shenson at redhat.com 2008-02-13 13:03 EST ------- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 18:14:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131814.m1DIEkWL016510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 13:14 EST ------- Excellent. Can you set the cvsextras commits too? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 18:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426251] Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131820.m1DIKLWr006410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tbb - the library that abstracts low-level threading details https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426251 pmachata at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-02-13 13:20 EST ------- initial build complete: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=423994 thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 18:22:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253564] Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131822.m1DIM79V006589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-13 13:22 EST ------- I had typed up a nice long comment but for some reason I don't see it here. GCC doesn't strip binaries. Normally rpmbuild will do so when it creates the debuginfo package, but it seems that it either doesn't know it needs to do this for ocaml-produced files or doesn't know how to. I commented out the stripping and the unstripped binaries make it to the final package so I guess that you have no choice. Could you open a ticket against rpm for this? Debian seems to be less strict than we are regarding licensing issues these days, so simply saying that they have a package listed with a certain license is not really sufficient. If you have a pointer to any discussion they may have had on this matter, that would be useful to whoever happens to read FE-Legal tickets. I still think it's odd that this package may produce executables, or not, depending on some specifics of the ocaml implementation, but i guess that's not a blockeer. Otherwise I think this package is OK, although of course I cannot approve it until the legal folks chime in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 18:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131833.m1DIXVop008570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-13 13:33 EST ------- Cool, this looks good. I believe all of the issues I had are now fixed. APPROVED I have already set you up in the account system, so you should be ready to make your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131912.m1DJC7bg027129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-13 14:12 EST ------- I don't know, sorry, and I'm not sponsored so i can't actually approve this, I havn't looked too deeply, but it seems ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131916.m1DJGmaw027929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 14:16 EST ------- Ok. Thanks! I'd sponsor you myself but I'm not a sponsor. :) I assume you have a review request out there that indicates you need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:26:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:26:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131926.m1DJQ5aE018534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 Bug 432033 depends on bug 432335, which changed state. Bug 432335 Summary: PATCH: rebuild CEGUI for new xerces-c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432335 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:25:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131925.m1DJP3vS029363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-13 14:25 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/freetalk.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/freetalk-3.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131931.m1DJVRZB019476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-13 14:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freetalk Short Description: A console based Jabber client Owners: rishi Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131932.m1DJWCXs019557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-13 14:32 EST ------- Actually, no. I was originally going to take over the Yakuake package, but was beaten to it. I'm actually thinking of packaging up some Drupal modules and themes myself now, thats why I 'reviewed' this. I thought of an odd issue though, to do with Drupal Module versioning schemes: Say a module is currently 5.x-2.0, it would be packaged as 2.0, yes, but when that module is ported to core 6.0 it would now be 6.x-1.0, necessitating an epoch bump if we wish to call it version 1.0? Is that the intention? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131933.m1DJXgiZ030553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 kwade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_note|fedora_requires_release_note |? |- ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-13 14:33 EST ------- We're not likely to make a release note about this. OTOH, we could talk about making it a feature of Fedora 9, which includes release note information; if we pursue that, we'll track the notes through the feature process: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy Let's talk about this idea via fedora-docs-list, after we've knocked things around a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131950.m1DJofdr001386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From poelstra at redhat.com 2008-02-13 14:50 EST ------- Do things that are only on the media version of the release get release notes? Yes, a feature page would definitely draw more visibility to this new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 19:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802131953.m1DJrRS2023268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Actually, no. I was originally going to take over the Yakuake package, but was > beaten to it. I'm actually thinking of packaging up some Drupal modules and > themes myself now, thats why I 'reviewed' this. I see. Practice makes perfect. :) > I thought of an odd issue though, to do with Drupal Module versioning schemes: > Say a module is currently 5.x-2.0, it would be packaged as 2.0, yes, but when > that module is ported to core 6.0 it would now be 6.x-1.0, necessitating an > epoch bump if we wish to call it version 1.0? Is that the intention? Well, not necessarily. As this is the first drupal module in Fedora, this would be the place to decide that. The versioning as I have it now strips ouit the drupal core version and leaves just the module version. I handle the drupal core requirement in the Requires. My assumption going forward is that there will only be one major version of drupal in each Fedora release, so that I should probably put a 'less than' clause in the Requires. The catch is that this would mean that I'd really need to coordinate the updating of drupal core with all the modules. I suppose I could look at perl and it's modules as a model for how to handle that. Not being a heavy drupal customizer myself, I'm curious how quickly after a major version release modules get updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251828] Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132001.m1DK1Isp025066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251828 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-13 15:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: quesa Short Description: OSS implementation of QuickDraw3D Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:01:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132001.m1DK1kIa003740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-13 15:01 EST ------- This builds with the xorg-x11-server-devel in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:09:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132009.m1DK9UWa005322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-13 15:09 EST ------- My bad, it has a -dev version! But that dosn't affect the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132008.m1DK8br1005268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From ben.lewis at benl.co.uk 2008-02-13 15:08 EST ------- I'm thinking of the CAPTCHA module is currently on version 5.x-3.1, whenever that is ported to Drupal 6 (and I may have to do it myself for a client in a week or so if it isn't) its version number will become 6.x-1.0, hence the problem as the upgrade path 3.1 -> 1.0 would be broken, requiring and epoch bump so it becomes 1:3.1 -> 2:1.0 (I _think_ that is what happens). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:22:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132022.m1DKMQvN028970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-13 15:22 EST ------- imo, the "for KDE 4" part of the summary,description should be omitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132026.m1DKQF6e008846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-13 15:26 EST ------- Yeah, maybe including major version would help. You're right, an epoch bump would be required in that instance, if they restart the module versioning at 1.0. I'll play with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132033.m1DKXEDb009985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-02-13 15:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #112) > Do things that are only on the media version of the release get release notes? Not necessarily. In the past, we gave priority to what was in the main media version. Not sure now where that line is. In general, we've avoided putting much energy into reporting on every new and interesting package. > Yes, a feature page would definitely draw more visibility to this new package. I'll rescind my comment that it is not release note worthy; obviously if it's a good feature, it's worthy. I more meant that we don't really have a place (beat) in the notes to cover this area other than "New Feature." We could, though, esp. if we decide to do some kind of Documenter/Publisher Spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431335] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132036.m1DKa3RH032038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431335 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2008-02-13 15:36 EST ------- Does build and play on development. However, it must install to %{python_sitelib} as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python At the moment it's /usr/share/decibel-audio-player Speaking of decibel-audio-player, why patch the .desktop to be Decibel Music Player? Every other reference, from the package name to the about box is Decibel Audio Player. I request it be Audio Player in the .desktop. Why not use the default BuildRoot of %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ? Good: Source matches License of GPLv2+ matches source headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132039.m1DKdShq011229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 15:39 EST ------- Mhh. Maybe. I've used this also in other packages to distinguish it from kde3 apps. BTW: Imported and built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132040.m1DKerWZ011806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-13 15:40 EST ------- I've been meaning to ask: is there some specific reason all of your links go to an https site with an invalid certificate? It's annoying to keep having to pass --no-check-certificate to wget and I can't imagine there's any reason why I would need to get a specfile over an encrypted channel. So, to the package. It still builds fine and rpmlint is down to just the spaces-and-tabs thing. If you're comfortable with having the test suite disabled and still believe that the software is useful and gives correct results even while some tests are known to fail the then I'm OK with that. I guess it would be preferable to disable the tests we know are failing so that we at least get some coverage, but I honestly don't know how difficult that would be to do. So, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 20:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132054.m1DKshDp014212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167254] Review Request: perl-Module-Versions-Report - Report versions of all modules in memory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132117.m1DLHmrR008196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Versions-Report - Report versions of all modules in memory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167254 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com CC|fedora-package- | |review at redhat.com | CC| |fedora-extras- | |list at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-13 16:17 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Module-Versions-Report New Branches: EL-5 Updated Fedora CC: perl-sig,xavierb Updated EPEL Owners: xavierb Updated EPEL CC: perl-sig,xavierb The Fedora maintainer is unresponsive, but I need this package to be in EPEL. See bug 431929. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:22:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:22:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 397031] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132122.m1DLMgCa020874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Upload - Secure managment of files submitted via HTML Forms Alias: pear-HTTP-Upload https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=397031 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-13 16:22 EST ------- Built successfully on all branches, thanks for the review! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132123.m1DLNvPG021058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132121.m1DLLnM4020762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-13 16:21 EST ------- Besides the standard R complaints, rpmlint says: R-car.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/R/library/car/CHANGES R-car.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/R/library/car/CHANGES The CHANGES file shouldn't be executable. However, once you fix that you'll get: R-car.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/R/library/car/CHANGES R-car.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/R/library/car/CHANGES so it needs a chmod, a pass through tr and a pass through iconv. I think that http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Descriptions/car.html is probably better as a URL tag. * source files match upstream: e9bcb523b0d667e256aba10ab1c432e834f444d6e35cda0f4de446135013ce7d car_1.2-7.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-car = 1.2-1.fc9 = /bin/sh R * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X CHANGES file should not be executable. * scriptlets are OK (R index installation) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:26:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132126.m1DLQjAC021962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-13 16:26 EST ------- Except then that pkg description is also in bugzilla, etc... (forever), what when kde5 version comes? Besides, end users should not want/need to care which toolkit an app uses. An exception, is an app/pkg that is toolkit or desktop-specific, ie, for Gnome or kde only, the "For Gnome" or "for kde" is appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:37:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132137.m1DLbYXi012175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-13 16:37 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-pear-PHPUnit New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132139.m1DLd9a5012428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-13 16:39 EST ------- Jason, I received a email confirmation of you sponsorship. I'm to get this message when try to change fedora-cvs flag to '?' for the CVS admin attention: "Flag Modification Denied You tried to request fedora-cvs. Only an authorized user can make this change." I have the existing memberships: Group Name Username R.Domain R.Type R Status Sponsor cvsextras wilmer user approved tibbs fedorabugs wilmer user approved Unneeded Any comment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:46:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:46:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132146.m1DLkMgE014140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-13 16:46 EST ------- Updated the spec file. * Wed Feb 13 2008 Orion Poplawski 1.2-2 - Fix file permissions, line endings and encoding Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] New: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/ksig/ksig.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/ksig/ksig-1.1-0.1.20080213.fc8.src.rpm Description: KSig is a graphical tool for keeping track of many different email signatures. The signatures themselves can be edited through KSig's graphical user interface. A command-line interface is then available for generating random or daily signatures from a list. The command-line interface makes a suitable plugin for generating signatures in external mail clients such as KMail. Note for reviewers: ksig has no official release of the KDE4 port yet. So the svn version is packaged here. But it should be as usuable as the KDE 3 version (last change was over one month ago). To create the svn checkout a modified script from upstream was used. There is also existing a short documentation about how to create a new tarball at your own. rpmlint: ksig.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksig/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common ksig.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksig/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common Normal warnings for KDE packages and could be ignored. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=424847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 21:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132155.m1DLtnb8015873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 16:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Except then that pkg description is also in bugzilla, etc... (forever), what > when kde5 version comes? Besides, end users should not want/need to care which > toolkit an app uses. An exception, is an app/pkg that is toolkit or > desktop-specific, ie, for Gnome or kde only, the "For Gnome" or "for kde" is > appropriate. Ok. Convinced. :) I'll remove the "KDE 4" phrase from the packages in cvs so that it will be picked up when the next updates arrives. If there will be none I'll bump them before F9 gets frozen. Or should I build them anyway? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 22:03:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:03:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132203.m1DM3k8Q017376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-13 17:03 EST ------- I'm always missing something today. :( Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/ksig/ksig.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/ksig/ksig-1.1-0.2.20080213.fc8.src.rpm Changelog: - +R: xdg-utils - +BR: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 22:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132249.m1DMnLQ1026802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-13 17:49 EST ------- So. This code is a *really bad idea*. Apps should not be twiddling with tunables in /proc or /sys - they are system wide attributes. You can have multiple apps - what if they want different things? This library doesn't actually prevent you from situations where the kernel changes without patching and rebuild, so you don't gain anything from an app standpoint. It's never the sort of thing which will be in Fedora base, or RHEL, and therefore any app that would want to use it would need ot have code to handle it not being there anyway. So, what's the point? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251828] Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132306.m1DN6eRd031016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251828 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 18:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196837] Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132305.m1DN5JUu030834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-PHPUnit - Regression testing framework for unit tests Alias: pear-PHPUnit3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196837 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 18:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:08:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132308.m1DN8Z75009950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-13 18:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132315.m1DNFilf000714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-13 18:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: publican-fedora Short Description: Publican documentation template files for fedora Owners: jfearn Branches: devel, F-8, EL-5, EL-4 InitialCC: mdious Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:15:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132315.m1DNFwpI011569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:46:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132346.m1DNkplJ006598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-13 18:46 EST ------- Sorry for any annoyance, the reason is that my ISP is blocking port 80, so that was just a simple workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132345.m1DNjQW6006431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: publican - publication tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132350.m1DNockE007352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain Alias: publican https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 18:50 EST ------- > Not necessarily. In the past, we gave priority to what was in the main media > version. Good point. > I more meant that we don't really have a place > (beat) in the notes to cover this area other than "New Feature". Yeah might be nice to have Docs docsbeat at some point anyway. :) (Anyway this conversation should probably move elsewhere... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 13 23:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802132356.m1DNu0io019268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 18:56 EST ------- cvs admin is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 00:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140003.m1E03L6A020832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-13 19:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unuran Short Description: Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator Owners: nbecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 00:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140049.m1E0nfSH029069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-02-13 19:49 EST ------- built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 00:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427483] Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140049.m1E0nhpq029134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 Bug 427483 depends on bug 427482, which changed state. Bug 427482 Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 00:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427484] Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140049.m1E0ngLQ029099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484 Bug 427484 depends on bug 427482, which changed state. Bug 427482 Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 01:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140116.m1E1GMRf022407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-13 20:16 EST ------- imo, no need to rebuild just for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 01:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140129.m1E1TWnr003400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 01:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140152.m1E1q7L0028025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 20:52 EST ------- 1)Can you add some lines in comments on "Creation of tarball from git"? 2) License is GPLv2+ 3)Use install command as make install prefix=%{_prefix} mandir=%{_mandir} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ==> this will take care of usage of macros and timestamp of man page. 4) explicit writing of attr for man page is not needed. make it simple as %{_mandir}/man1/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 01:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140155.m1E1t4cE007463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 20:55 EST ------- This is built and imported in devel. Therefore Closing this review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 02:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140219.m1E2JPUs011288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 21:19 EST ------- Oh I forgot to add; fio itself appears to be GPLv2, but it incorporates some files which are listed as GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 02:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140218.m1E2IsiM011240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 21:18 EST ------- The tarball was not in fact created from git, it is, as near as I can tell, a released tarball from the URL from the Source0: line. re: license, when I look at fio.c, it says: * The license below covers all files distributed with fio unless otherwise * noted in the file itself. * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as * published by the Free Software Foundation. Should both GPLv2 and GPLv2+ be listed? re: the other things; I'll fix those up, someday I'll be good at this :) new spec & src.rpm, except no license change (yet) is up... Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 02:41:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140241.m1E2f7ud003834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-13 21:41 EST ------- Well, you do have to give it time to propagate to all of the various systems and databases. I think this happens at least once an hour, so it should almost certainly be working now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 03:30:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140330.m1E3Ug95024203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 22:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Could you explain me what should I fix? download source tarball using wget and just package it in SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 03:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140334.m1E3YFN2013030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 22:34 EST ------- you should bump release and add changelog instead to create same SRPM again and again that may confuse reviewer. License is Ok GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 03:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140341.m1E3fx0d026380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 22:41 EST ------- + is OK - is Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=425562 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 75de5c1adb944bfee44d126 fio-1.18.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 03:44:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140344.m1E3iTLA014960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-13 22:44 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fio Short Description: Multithreaded IO generation tool Owners: sandeen Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 03:53:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] New: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts-1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package provides a free Sarai Hindi TrueType font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 04:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140423.m1E4N4Qd002095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 23:23 EST ------- I think Group should be Applications/Internet when I followed instructions to generate tarball packages in SRPM I got different tarball name but contents looked same b2ecb5bd331e0557bed03904f2fbbd17 ksig-1.1-svn.tar.bz2 485a276fa48bcc0980ec9e3862bf9d38 ksig-1.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 04:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140427.m1E4R5Y2023536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-13 23:27 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=425557 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. But NOT for RPM. ksig.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksig/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common ksig.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/ksig/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common ==> Ok to accept + source files match upstream. b2ecb5bd331e0557bed03904f2fbbd17 ksig-1.1-svn.tar.bz2 485a276fa48bcc0980ec9e3862bf9d38 ksig-1.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + xdg-utils scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. SHOULD: Group should be Applications/Internet APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 05:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140514.m1E5ET28010622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-14 00:14 EST ------- Still builds fine and rpmlint is slient excepting the two expected complaints for R packages. Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 05:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140518.m1E5IBwm031816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-02-14 00:18 EST ------- Jonathan, thanks for adding me as comaintainer. I returned from vacations yesterday, so I couldn't take action sooner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 05:28:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140528.m1E5SKKC013115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 07:07:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140707.m1E77mlX028832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-14 02:07 EST ------- For 1.2-2: A. spec file issue * scriptlet output - I guess that (although I could not find where it is written) Fedora requests that scriptlet output must be quiet. For now -utils %post scriptlets shows a lot of output messages. If you want to keep these messages IMO these should be redirected to some log file. * Directory ownership issue - My directory check shows (I have not installed -doc subpackage) ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost crystalspace]$ grep package DIR-check.log | grep any /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2/LICENSE crystalspace-1.2-2.1.fc9 file /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2 is not owned by any package /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2/README crystalspace-1.2-2.1.fc9 file /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2 is not owned by any package /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2/history.old crystalspace-1.2-2.1.fc9 file /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2 is not owned by any package /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2/history.txt crystalspace-1.2-2.1.fc9 file /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2 is not owned by any package /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2/history_1.2.txt crystalspace-1.2-2.1.fc9 file /usr/share/doc/crystalspace-1.2 is not owned by any package ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Multilib issue - I don't know how we should deal with multilib issue (no, I REALLY don't know!!), however at least %_bindir/cs-config-1.2 causes multilib conflict. ---------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost bin]$ diff -u /usr/bin/cs-config-1.2 ./cs-config-1.2 --- /usr/bin/cs-config-1.2 2008-02-14 13:47:02.000000000 +0900 +++ ./cs-config-1.2 2008-02-14 13:41:13.000000000 +0900 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ do prefix="${p}" exec_prefix="${prefix}" - makeout="./out/linuxx86/debug" + makeout="./out/linux/debug" version="1.2" longversion="crystalspace 1.2" newincdir="" @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ case $1 in -lcrystalspace-1.2) DEPS=" -lpthread -lpthread -lz" ;; -lcrystalspace_opengl-1.2) DEPS=" -lcrystalspace-1.2 -lGL -lXext -lX11 -lX11 -lXext -lpthread -lm" ;; - -lcrystalspace_python-1.2) DEPS=" -lcrystalspace-1.2 -L/usr/lib/python2.5 -lpython2.5 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpthread" ;; + -lcrystalspace_python-1.2) DEPS=" -lcrystalspace-1.2 -L/usr/lib64/python2.5 -lpython2.5 -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpthread" ;; -lcrystalspace_staticplugins-1.2) DEPS="" ;; *) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Someone says that on -devel subpackage multilib confilct must be avoided. * Dependency for -devel subpackage - Please check the dependency for -devel subpackage. Example: - From /usr/include/crystalspace-1.2/csplugincommon/opengl/glcommon2d.h : ----------------------------------------------------------------- 26 #if defined(CS_OPENGL_PATH) 27 #include CS_HEADER_GLOBAL(CS_OPENGL_PATH,gl.h) 28 #else 29 #include 30 #endif ----------------------------------------------------------------- - /usr/include/crystalspace-1.2/ivideo/wxwin.h has #include - And some others. ? Timestamps - This rpm installs many "non-built" files and keeping timestamps on them are generally desirable. Would you try to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible? (usually adding INSTALL="install -p" works, at least on recent autotool-based Makefiles) !! For license issues, I will check it later (as the tarball contains more than 10000 files, which is the largest number I have ever reviewed) !! Again currently crystalspace does not build due to missing dep for hal :( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=425708 Simply rebuilding hal against new libsmbios seems good http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=425729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 07:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140746.m1E7kohS002601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-14 02:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3)> SHOULD: > Group should be Applications/Internet I took Applications/Productivity from kdepim (ksig was used to be in kdepim). But Applications/Internet should also be fine. I'll change that after the import. (In reply to comment #3)> SHOULD: > APPROVED. Thx! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ksig Short Description: A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures Owners: svahl,than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 09:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431386] Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140901.m1E91ss1015324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431386 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2008-02-14 04:01 EST ------- Yay security packages. Builds on development and runs. rpmlint: rkhunter.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/rkhunter.conf 0640 rkhunter.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/rkhunter 0640 Fine, don't let the bad guys read rkhunter config rkhunter.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-var rkhunter rkhunter.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 30) Allow. rkhunter.src: W: strange-permission 01-rkhunter 0755 A script, ignore. License good, GPLv2+ Source matches Is noarch Follows naming guidelines Proper use of macros %files section proper permissions, ownership The perl scripts in the spec are a bit hard to read, but their configuration purpose is clear. As to perl scripts for sha1/md5 I agree system executables should be used. In a rootkit detection situation you may not be able to trust them, which is the only case I would find those useful. If that's the case I doubt rkhunter would be much help, as perl and the system is probably untrustworthy anyway. Feel free to continue to not include them. I see cron is using the --update flag. Applying updates will make the db show up on rpm verification as changed. This might bother the worried user running rpm -V that their rkhunter is compromised. I don't see any other way of keeping it updated in between major releases. Package itself is fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 09:07:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140907.m1E97MNk005216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rbhalera at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 09:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140927.m1E9RtvM020110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(nikolay at vladimirof | |f.com) ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-14 04:27 EST ------- ping again ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 09:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:55:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802140955.m1E9tZfH013173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 10:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431356] Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141002.m1EA2uCQ026031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipng - Converts DVI files to PNG/GIF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431356 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-14 05:02 EST ------- Hi Jindrich - no problem. Hope you had a good vacation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 11:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 06:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141131.m1EBVxvI029492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-14 06:31 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141217.m1ECHbx8016425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-14 07:17 EST ------- Ok then. I've committed the changes to cvs this morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141224.m1ECOljY017392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-14 07:24 EST ------- The package builds in mock and rpmlint sees no issues: $ls /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/*.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/epdfview-debuginfo-0.1.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/epdfview-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/epdfview-0.1.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm $rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/*.rpm $ I did a scratch build in Koji too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=426258 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:23:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] New: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mschmidt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/epdfview/epdfview.spec SRPM URL: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/epdfview/epdfview-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: ePDFView is a lightweight PDF document viewer using Poppler and GTK+ libraries. The aim of ePDFView is to make a simple PDF document viewer, in the lines of Evince but without using the Gnome libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432613] Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141226.m1ECQdhd017970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kgrab - A screen grabbing utility for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432613 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-14 07:26 EST ------- thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141239.m1ECdpMc019852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-02-14 07:39 EST ------- Output of rpmlint: $ rpmlint sarai-fonts-1.0-1.fc8.noarch.rpm sarai-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation The above may be ignored, but it is recommended to include a license text file as a part of documentation. You may use %{fontname} in following line: 4 Name: sarai-fonts I think URL should be the one from sarai.net. http://www.sarai.net/practices/indic-localization/downloads-1/Sarai_07.ttf According to new policies, please replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}. Rest all looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 12:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141253.m1ECrYSk010961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-14 07:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libitl Short Description: Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project Owners: izhar Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: izhar Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 13:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141308.m1ED8Ou1014081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-02-14 08:08 EST ------- Documented in spec. The replacement is for configuration tools to directly configure the files they are configuring. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 13:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225240] Merge Review: alchemist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141329.m1EDTcff028958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: alchemist https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225240 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-14 08:29 EST ------- Beautiful. Thank you! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 13:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141355.m1EDtxoM001246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 langel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-14 08:55 EST ------- Is there a way we can get this into F9 (in rawhide before March 4)? We need this for the java-1.7.0-icedtea ppc/64 package. It now includes a zero-assembler implementation. Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 14:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141418.m1EEIblf006061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-14 09:18 EST ------- Received an answear some days ago. I've ask the xcalib developer if it would be possible to repack the sources without fglrx pre-built binaries and without icc profiles (as i expect we will need to re-create them either with argyll or else - but in this case, they are unneeded). I still need advices for the postcardware problem. ? Does it can be seen as a advertising issue that is incompatible with the GPL itself ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 14:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141422.m1EEMa67028767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-14 09:22 EST ------- Any filesystem maintainer to gives advices ? Can i add this myself ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 14:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141428.m1EESYcm029994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-14 09:28 EST ------- No. The "postcardware" problem isn't a use-restriction, its an optional thing. If you are compelled to send the author a postcard, you can, but are not required to do so. Just mark this as GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 14:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:45:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141445.m1EEjUMo011398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From aph at redhat.com 2008-02-14 09:45 EST ------- I agree with Anthony: libffi has never been part of gcc. I agree with Anthony: libffi is not a part of gcc, and never has been. We need a separate package because 1. We need to decouple the release cycle of libffi from that of gcc. Having to ask jakub to rebuild the whole gcc package for a small libffi change is a big nuisance. 2. jakub has made it plain that he doesn't want to build a libffi sub-package of gcc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 15:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] New: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe-20071004-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Figtoipe is a program that reads FIG files (as generated by xfig) and generates an XML file readable by the Ipe editor. Note?#1: That tool was previously shipped with the Ipe editor itself. From ipe-6.0pre30, figtoipe is released in another tarball. Maybe I should add a field "Obsoletes: ipe < 6.0-0.23.pre30". I am not used to the semantic of Obsoletes: and I am not sure of that. What do you think? Note?#2: the spec file is really simple. No call to configure or make. Just one call to g++, and a manual installation. I use perl to extract a changelog from the .cpp file. That way I can make it a %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 15:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141521.m1EFLfkF008712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-14 10:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I agree with Anthony: libffi has never been part of gcc. > > I agree with Anthony: libffi is not a part of gcc, and never has been. I think you should communicate these claims to the GCS and the FSF. > 1. We need to decouple the release cycle of libffi from that of gcc. > Having to ask jakub to rebuild the whole gcc package for a small > libffi change is a big nuisance. > > 2. jakub has made it plain that he doesn't want to build a libffi > sub-package of gcc. This is the point: Redhat has decided to fork. May I ask Jacub to split out libiberty? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141602.m1EG2mlk017192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From aph at redhat.com 2008-02-14 11:02 EST ------- Red Hat has not decided to fork. Red Hat is the original author of libffi, and its upstream is where it has always been. The only fork is in your head. You think I should tell the SC that libffi is not part of gcc. I have no intention of doing that, because they already know. libiberty is an FSF project; libffi is not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:01:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141601.m1EG1RiA016851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2008-02-14 11:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #73) > So. > > This code is a *really bad idea*. > > Apps should not be twiddling with tunables in /proc or /sys - they are system > wide attributes. Agreed, but many applications need some tunables to be set higher than the default values. So, today, there must be administrators doing an "echo xxx > /proc/kernel/sys/yyy", either by hand or via a script. This is only what the libtune is intended to do. > You can have multiple apps - what if they want different things? This is a related problem which libtune was not made to solve. Applications made to solve this problem in different ways could use libtune. System administrators could then choose between a variety of potentially competing applications or manual tuning. Then, if a single such application emerges libtune would be a good place to add that without worrying about changing every app that uses the tunable. Though this does assume changing most or all existing apps to use the library initially. > This library doesn't actually prevent you from situations where the kernel > changes without patching and rebuild, so you don't gain anything from an app > standpoint. Yes, in that case the libtune package must be patched and rebuilt. If the tunable change is simple enough the advantage is the apps that depend on that tunable shouldn't need to be patched and rebuilt themselves -- libtune insulates them against most tunable interface changes. > It's never the sort of thing which will be in Fedora base, or RHEL, > and therefore any app that would want to use it would need ot have code to > handle it not being there anyway. So, what's the point? > Yes, if it got into only one then there'd be little point. However isn't it safer to have a migration path? There'd be a period where an app would use both libtune and its own code. Then, once libtune is in both Fedora and RHEL, the application-specific code could be dropped. Alternatively, if libtune were thrown out then use of libtune could be reverted without breaking things. Without this kind of migration you almost have a chicken-and-the-egg paradox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141607.m1EG7aU0028520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-14 11:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > For 1.2-2: > > A. spec file issue > * scriptlet output > - I guess that (although I could not find where it is written) > Fedora requests that scriptlet output must be quiet. > > For now -utils %post scriptlets shows a lot of output messages. > If you want to keep these messages IMO these should be redirected > to some log file. > I didn't silence this to check it went ok during development, silenced now. > * Directory ownership issue > - My directory check shows (I have not installed -doc subpackage) Fixed > * Multilib issue > - I don't know how we should deal with multilib issue (no, I REALLY > don't know!!), however > at least %_bindir/cs-config-1.2 causes multilib conflict. Fixed > * Dependency for -devel subpackage > - Please check the dependency for -devel subpackage. > Example: > - From /usr/include/crystalspace-1.2/csplugincommon/opengl/glcommon2d.h : > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 26 #if defined(CS_OPENGL_PATH) > 27 #include CS_HEADER_GLOBAL(CS_OPENGL_PATH,gl.h) > 28 #else > 29 #include > 30 #endif > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > - /usr/include/crystalspace-1.2/ivideo/wxwin.h has #include Hmm, thats optional better to not frag in wx for people who use crystalspace without wx. Otherwise Fixed. > ? Timestamps > - This rpm installs many "non-built" files and keeping timestamps on > them are generally desirable. Would you try to keep timestamps on > installed files as much as possible? > (usually adding INSTALL="install -p" works, at least on recent > autotool-based Makefiles) > This does not use regular makefiles but jam, which I've been fighting all the way to stop it from using custom CFLAGS, so I see no sane way to fix this. New version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace-1.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:22:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:22:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141622.m1EGMCZS031617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-14 11:22 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois-0.3-1.src.rpm This is update for upstream release 0.3. I'd like to get this into F9 -- any willing reviewer? It's a pretty simple package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] New: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds-0.8-0.1.prealpha.fc8.src.rpm Description: Greyhounds is a greyhound racing and breeding game. Your goal is to acquire fast and talented greyhounds and be successful with them in the races; your two possibilities for doing so are breeding and trading. Ultimately you should aim at winning the Champions' Trophy. You might also consider establishing a record that lasts to the end of times a worthy goal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 16:47:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141647.m1EGl8mk004052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-14 11:47 EST ------- Here's a test release for review... http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.2-1.fc8.src.rpm http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141704.m1EH4BR2007794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-14 12:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift-data/vdrift-data.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrfit-data/vdrift-data-20071226-2.src.rpm Greatly cleaned up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:03:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:03:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141703.m1EH3ntT007736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-14 12:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift-20071226-2.src.rpm Greatly cleaned up, bullet issue still unaddressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141705.m1EH5R0k008305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(danms at us.ibm.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141709.m1EH9rIK031396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-14 12:09 EST ------- Is 2.99.2 going to be ABI compatible with 3.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141714.m1EHEpWv009542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-14 12:14 EST ------- Well, what should we do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141734.m1EHY06k013107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-14 12:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Is 2.99.2 going to be ABI compatible with 3.0? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141747.m1EHl6nu005313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-14 12:47 EST ------- mamoru: I'd say we wait until the reporter has some more free time. There are/were packages waiting much longer than one month. As a side note, between 13.01 and 18.01 I have exchanged numerous mails with him (about this package) and he used to react quickly, but he was lacking some grasp on the fedora packaging rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:56:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:56:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141756.m1EHuuVc007094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-14 12:56 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-car Short Description: Companion to Applied Regression package for R Owners: orion Branches: F-8 F-7 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431386] Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141757.m1EHv69I007140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431386 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 12:57 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review! Package Name: rkhunter Short Description: A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits Owners: kevin,devrim Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 17:58:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141758.m1EHwXPc017695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-14 12:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #74) > > Apps should not be twiddling with tunables in /proc or /sys - they are system > > wide attributes. > > Agreed, but many applications need some tunables to be set higher than the > default values. So, today, there must be administrators doing an "echo xxx > > /proc/kernel/sys/yyy", either by hand or via a script. > This is only what the libtune is intended to do. It is an administrator issue - they are the only ones who can arbitrate between the needs of different apps. > > It's never the sort of thing which will be in Fedora base, or RHEL, > > and therefore any app that would want to use it would need ot have code to > > handle it not being there anyway. So, what's the point? > > > > Yes, if it got into only one then there'd be little point. However isn't > it safer to have a migration path? There'd be a period where an app > would use both libtune and its own code. Then, once libtune is in both > Fedora and RHEL, Re-read above please. It's *never* going to be in the Fedora base distribution or RHEL, as the upstream kernel and development community has rejected it as a way of doing things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141805.m1EI5dG3009088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Summary|Review Request: unuran-0.7.2|Review Request: unuran - | |Universal Non-Uniform Random | |number generator ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 13:05 EST ------- What do you mean by "Cvsextras Commits: tibbs at math.uh.edu" ? You want tibbs to be in InitialCC? The Cvsextras Commits: field should be 'yes' or 'no'. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:17:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141817.m1EIH86O021590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-14 13:17 EST ------- Actually, please don't CC me; I do too many reviews to be CC'd on all of the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141820.m1EIKO9O022354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-14 13:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unuran Short Description: Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator Owners: nbecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141820.m1EIK2Re022313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-14 13:20 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-views/drupal-views-5.x.1.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Altered version format to address the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141822.m1EIMAfX022714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 13:22 EST ------- As the owner of 4 greyhounds, I would be happy to review this package... ;) Look for a full review later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:40:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141840.m1EIeOUv026038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-14 13:40 EST ------- Update to version 1.1 Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-mass-ocs-import.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141846.m1EIkK9O016524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-02-14 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #75) > > Yes, if it got into only one then there'd be little point. However isn't > > it safer to have a migration path? There'd be a period where an app > > would use both libtune and its own code. Then, once libtune is in both > > Fedora and RHEL, > > Re-read above please. It's *never* going to be in the Fedora base distribution > or RHEL, as the upstream kernel and development community has rejected it > as a way of doing things. By "Fedora base distribution" I believe Bill means it will not be included in a default install or on the release .isos. The package would reside only in the yum repositories and would require uses to explicitly install it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 18:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429199] Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141857.m1EIvsCe018715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polyester3 - A style for KDE3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429199 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-14 13:57 EST ------- Imported and built some time ago. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 19:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141928.m1EJSWIm025164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-14 14:28 EST ------- Also, from the description of how this is architected, you're basically requiring all apps to: 1) run as root 2) have SELinux allow them to access all of /proc, /sys, etc. That is awful for security reasons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 19:31:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802141931.m1EJV0Wj005586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-14 14:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > I see no improvement about the compat location field with this version. Any "issues" whatsoever with the compatibility with RHEL have been resolved, I would call that improvement. I don't see compatibility with RHEL a blocker, why do you resist passing this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 21:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142122.m1ELMkDq013887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-02-14 16:22 EST ------- first days of next week i should finish a documentation of my job for factory where i work, so after i can return on fedora package of themonospot. I can succeed to do it, don't doubt :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142211.m1EMBtWt024252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142211.m1EMBZRg003988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran - Universal Non-Uniform Random number generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142210.m1EMAPdh003734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-14 17:10 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294952&action=view) PATCH: fixing vdrift compile with gcc-4.3 Full review done .. MUST FIX -------- - Doesn't compile with gcc-4.3, patch fixing this attached - It isn't necessary to pass --libdir=%{_libdir} to %configure - %doc docs/* is no good, this will include the following unwanted files: INSTALL HOW_TO_COMPILE.txt SConscript - remove -32x32 from icon name - remove obsolte Version and Encoding entries from .desktop file - Contains some non free files in the sourcetarbal, these must be removed and then we (Fedora) must ship our own sourcetarbal without these, all troublesome files are under the bullet-2.64, so I'm omitting that from their path: glew32.dll: non free SGI licensed version of glew GLUT32.DLL: glut is not free software (unlike freeglut) Glut contains more non free glew and glut stuff Extras : atleast the COLLADA_DOM is a problem as that contains files under the SCEA Shared Source License 1.0, which seems fine, but hasn't been audited yet, so its easier to just remove these files Demos : atleast the BulletDinoDemo is not properly licensed, I stopped auditing this dir after that, just blow it away You will also need to remove the following 2 lines from Jamfile.in (again in bullet-2.64), to make jam no longer look for the removed dirs: SubInclude TOP Extras ; SubInclude TOP Demos ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142214.m1EME3dV024557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-14 17:14 EST ------- Ok, we're getting close... http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.3-1.fc8.src.rpm http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi.spec I think this is ready for somebody to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:13:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142213.m1EMDVvb024499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:15:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431386] Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142215.m1EMF8eg024983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rkhunter - A host-based tool to scan for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431386 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142216.m1EMGew2004947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142219.m1EMJvqa005309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:19 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142221.m1EMLxft005982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 17:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:25:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142225.m1EMPC8R006719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-14 17:25 EST ------- Should we wait until you have 3 out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142237.m1EMbnnh008844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-14 17:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Should we wait until you have 3 out? No. There won't be any substantial changes -- mostly more testing on other platforms and maybe cleaning up of the docs. The 2.99.* to 3.0 change should be seamless and I don't want to slow down the work depending on libffi in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432655] Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142242.m1EMgUCg009778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-car - Companion to Applied Regression package for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432655 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-14 17:42 EST ------- Checked in and built. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142245.m1EMjmnB030255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-14 17:45 EST ------- libdir = $(prefix)/lib/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi is my main problem: libdir = $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi libdir := $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi libdir += $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi are all three not working. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 22:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142256.m1EMuL6U032344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-14 17:56 EST ------- This fixes a pkgconfig bug... http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.4-1.fc8.src.rpm http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi.spec spot: after installing this, I modified the g-wrap spec file like so... -export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIC" +export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIC `pkg-config libffi --cflags`" ...and it builds and installs fine with the system libffi package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 23:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142329.m1ENT2YG019048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 14 23:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802142328.m1ENSmOX019013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-14 18:28 EST ------- Well, the BR needs to be zlib-devel, not zlib. Also, I'd like to see a copy of the license in the final package. * source files match upstream: ea0d1ff62c7c342450fdb0676a2b6192 figtoipe-20071004.tar.gz ea0d1ff62c7c342450fdb0676a2b6192 figtoipe-20071004.tar.gz.new * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. XXX License text not included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock ( ). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 01:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150120.m1F1K312028097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 nospam at thenerdshow.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(nospam at thenerdshow| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-02-14 20:20 EST ------- Yes? I have several submissions but I am unaware of my sponsor status. If somebody would like to sponsor me that would be cool. This is more of a feature request but since I'm using it I thought I'd share what I got. Sorry about the missing buildrequires. The Fedora packager guide made no mention of yum deplist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 01:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] New: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ncorrare at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 02:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150224.m1F2OiWW006778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-14 21:24 EST ------- Thanks all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 02:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150224.m1F2Ok7k006819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 Bug 431188 depends on bug 431181, which changed state. Bug 431181 Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 02:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150224.m1F2Oj39006799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 Bug 431186 depends on bug 431181, which changed state. Bug 431181 Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 03:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:38:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150338.m1F3cQx7020674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-14 22:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mybashburn Short Description: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Owners: wilmer Branches: F-8 InitialCC: wilmer Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 03:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245919] Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150354.m1F3sGdU023149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openvpn-auth-ldap - OpenVPN plugin for LDAP authentication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245919 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 22:54 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (BSD) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 03dedc57efc8d4fc2ffe2c014121299d auth-ldap-2.0.3.tar.gz 03dedc57efc8d4fc2ffe2c014121299d auth-ldap-2.0.3.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. rpmlint says: openvpn-auth-ldap.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/openvpn/auth/ldap.conf 0600 I assume the conf file is not readable due to containing the LDAP bind info? openvpn-auth-ldap.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/openvpn/plugin/lib/openvpn-auth-ldap.so This is not a dynamic library, but a dlopened plugin, so ignore this. Everything looks good here... this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 04:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150405.m1F45Rks025589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-14 23:05 EST ------- I of course don't have the hardware to test this, but I can check the package otherwise. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 198d2c738c16537c273546f2e74538bd xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0.tar.bz2 198d2c738c16537c273546f2e74538bd xf86-input-diamondtouch-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install See below - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Might ask upstream to include a copy of the license they use. Not a blocker of course. 2. rpmlint complains: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/diamondtouch/ee_defs.h Is there any point in shipping this header file? I'll leave it up to you if you want to ship that header or not, otherwise this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 04:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150411.m1F4BYZj005332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-14 23:11 EST ------- I can't see poppler-glib-devel on F8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 04:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150410.m1F4As4c005166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-14 23:10 EST ------- 1)tarball packages in SRPM does not preserve upstream released tarball timestamp. Good if you use wget and download tarball and package in SRPM. 2)To preserve timestamps from files being copied from upstream tarball use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 3) Drop following from SPEC Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils as per said at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef 4)Use scriptlet of update-desktop-database as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 04:38:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150438.m1F4ca5Z009056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-14 23:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > igraph is done. python-igraph is just waiting for review. I think it's > ready. Did I miss something? Ok .fine. I was expecting new SRPM with source url updated in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150505.m1F55LgF002494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-15 00:05 EST ------- New revision: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Fixed URL Used macro as suggested Added License I checked the policies and didn't see one enforcing a particular style of buildroot. The packaging guidelines suggests the package maintainer pick one and stick to it which is what I am doing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:06:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150506.m1F560DW002570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 00:05 EST ------- + is Ok - is Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=428749 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM But NOT for RPM. python-igraph.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 ==> Can be ignored. - source files match with different upstream url 0cac31e94e0d44cb2ffd5dea5d9ac695 python-igraph-0.4.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package python-igraph-0.4.5-6.fc9 => Provides: core.so Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libigraph.so.0 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.5.so.1.0 libxml2.so.2 libz.so.1 python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI App. SHOULD: Add correct Source URL. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150516.m1F5GvHI004085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 00:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > libdir = $(prefix)/lib/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi is my main problem: > > libdir = $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi > libdir := $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi > libdir += $(libdir)/unicap$(pkg_version)/cpi > > are all three not working. Suggestions? Yup. I tried that. Its because when you use $(libdir) it becomes recursive substitution in above lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:29:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150529.m1F5T4YJ016688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 00:29 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150532.m1F5WBo1006397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-15 00:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294976&action=view) Proposed diff (Untested and likely incomplete) Please read what I wrote in comment #13 and c.f. the patch in the attachment. You need to eliminate all local redefinitions of libdir, not trying to redefine it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:32:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150532.m1F5WaCa017373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #294976|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #294976|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432646] Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150546.m1F5kQd4019424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fio - multi-threaded IO generator tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432646 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-15 00:46 EST ------- All set, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 05:47:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432580] Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150547.m1F5lBrr019508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffsb - The Flexible Filesystem Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432580 esandeen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From esandeen at redhat.com 2008-02-15 00:47 EST ------- All set, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 06:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150611.m1F6BMaC012875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 01:11 EST ------- Builds OK and rpmlint is silent. I believe the license should be "LGPLv2 with exceptions" as the LICENCE file describes a set of circumstances under which one of the LGPL clauses may be avoided. This doesn't render the software non-free or anything, but it's still something which needs to be noted. I need to get a ruling on the duplication of the documentation files which I've seen on some of your packages. The review guidelines state explicitly that you should not have duplicates in your %files lists and this will usually terminate the build but for some reason duplicating %doc files doesn't. I've asked for some guidance on the fedora-packaging list. If I don't see anything negative about the practice by tomorrow, I'll go ahead and approve this. * source files match upstream: 9ef339ed4cb15f0c458d0093b90dd249d8d1dfb1b01a1fedc542e67f67a7194f cryptokit-1.3.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * ocaml templates and guidelines are followed. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field doesn't quite match the license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-cryptokit-1.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm dllcryptokit.so()(64bit) ocaml(Cryptokit) = 1f0f8298e13e19d726d354711a8a5f35 ocaml-cryptokit = 1.3-1.fc9 = libz.so.1()(64bit) ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Filename) = 633a1e7f590ff5e95124293dbef3b476 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87 ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.0 ocaml-cryptokit-devel-1.3-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml-cryptokit-devel = 1.3-1.fc9 = ocaml-cryptokit = 1.3-1.fc9 * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. ? some duplicated %doc files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 06:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150625.m1F6PvpK025725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 ------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za 2008-02-15 01:25 EST ------- Spec URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-4.spec SRPM URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-4.fc8.src.rpm New SRPM and SPEC to address the last issue of using Source1 instead of Patch. All the issues noted have now been fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 06:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] New: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/fldigi.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/fldigi-2.09-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: fldigi is a modem program which supports most of the digital modes used by hamradio operators today. You can also use the program for calibrating your sound card to WWV or doing a frequency measurement test. The program also comes with a CW decoder. fldigi is written with the help of the Fast Light Toolkit X GUI. Package builds against rawhide, is waiting for https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-1308 so it can be built for F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 07:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150721.m1F7L1UB024600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-15 02:21 EST ------- Update (figtoipe-20071004-4.fc9): http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe.spec http://www.normalesup.org/~rineau/Fedora/figtoipe-20071004-4.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Well, the BR needs to be zlib-devel, not zlib. %-S Sorry for that stupid error. My laptop is too short in free space today to run mock. > Also, I'd like to see a copy of the license in the final package. I have added a copy of http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt Maybe should I add a copy of the GPLv3, as the licensing is GPLv2+ (with an exception for CGAL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 07:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150752.m1F7q2gL029342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-15 02:52 EST ------- Some questions / remarks. I see this still installs its headers directly under /usr/include (atleast guichan.hpp), wouldn't it be better to instead put them under /usr/include/guichan-0.6 (both guichan.hpp and the guichan header dir). Since this is also providing a -devel it should not be called compat-guichan06 but just guichan06. Also is ballz the only user of guichan-0.6 ? If it is I could take a stab at porting it, that would be better then carrying multiple versions for just one package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 08:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 03:15:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150815.m1F8FcUE001574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 03:15 EST ------- Ralf, I added aclocal and automake to %prep and applied your patch but it looks to me some problem with autotools. here is scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=428980 What am I missing then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150907.m1F97Ggn010593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-15 04:07 EST ------- cairo-clock-0.3.3-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398601] Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150905.m1F95n9r019810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cairo-clock - Cairo-rendered on-screen clock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398601 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-15 04:05 EST ------- cairo-clock-0.3.3-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150905.m1F95PjL019731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-02-15 04:05 EST ------- Output of rpmlint: "sarai-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This package provides a free Sarai Hindi TrueType font. It is meant for print and publishing needs." There should be a line break every 80 characters. The URL given for Source0 is not a direct link to the font file. It gives another webpage. I would suggest to keep the earlier source, i.e. just "Sarai_07.ttf". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:10:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150910.m1F9ASwL011287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 04:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Hi, build is complete: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36377 Thanks for this build. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226518] Merge Review: usbutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150902.m1F92IcD009552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: usbutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226518 ------- Additional Comments From jmoskovc at redhat.com 2008-02-15 04:02 EST ------- Hi, build is complete: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210464] Review Request: anjuta - A very capable IDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150927.m1F9RrW7013726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A very capable IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210464 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-15 04:27 EST ------- I'd like to request EL-5 branch. I have some users who'd like to use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150928.m1F9SRFf023186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-15 04:28 EST ------- well, After 3 to 4 scratch build attempts I got following workaround in SPEC in addition to Ralf's patch 1)Add BR: automake libtool 2)Add following to %prep aclocal -I m4 autoconf automake Successful scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=429171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:34:42 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150934.m1F9YgN4014599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-15 04:34 EST ------- This is just bugzilla UTF-8 handling being broken. It's not a package problem. Last I looked at it upstream had implemented proper UTF-8 support for new bugzilla databases, but existing ones need to be painfuly converted (painfully since previous bugzilla versions allowed any sort of encoding mixes making clean data recovery hard) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:40:45 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150940.m1F9ejlt025445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-15 04:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > OK, I realize we have leak in the FPG, people seem to be keen to exploit. ??? > IMHO, this package name should be rejected, because > a) It technically means asking for trouble wrt. tools processing rpms/rpm-spec > (rpmbuild, rpm, yum, apt, yumex, createrepo, db-formats etc.). > I am sure at least some of them are not able to process such names. What's asking for trouble is continuing to ignore UTF-8 handling problems in low-level rpm tools. All our software stack has been moving to UTF-8 for years, and in fact our upper package management layers (comps...) already use XML (which default encoding is UTF-8) pervasively. As far as I know there is *no* way to restrict XML to a 7-bit encoding like ASCII, and even if it were it's probably not supported by one or several of the XML libs we use, since it's not a common need. And if you start using 8-bit encodings UTF-8 is the only one everyone agrees on. > b) It is user unfriendly: You can't expect people to be able to type "arbitrary > exotic characters" on their keyboard. This is not a problem. The GUI tools do not care, and the package provides an ascii-7 name alias for CLI users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 09:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802150943.m1F9hEEt016126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitmap-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-15 04:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > spot and nim-nim, > Can you please help me to know legality of this package and its license name? > Are Lucida fonts acceptable? For spot (FE-LEGAL) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 10:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151044.m1FAi6Js002853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-02-15 05:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > * Please use macros. > > You should not use /etc/rc.d but should use /etc/rc.d/init.d > > and the corresponding macro is %{_sysconfdir} > > The corresponding macro is %{_initrddir}. I have tried to fix as many issues as I could by looking through the Packaging Guidelines. Can you comment on it once please? Also how will I distribute the init scripts since they are not part of the original package? As a patch? The updated SPEC file is located at : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec SRPM : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.5-1.fc7.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 11:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151132.m1FBW4wX001700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-02-15 06:32 EST ------- A new 0.5.1 version of CDuce has been released. http://www.cduce.org/download.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 11:37:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 06:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151137.m1FBb1HJ012037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-15 06:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-igraph Short Description: Python bindings for igraph Owners: nbecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 12:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151221.m1FCLpi1009870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-15 07:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > 1)tarball packages in SRPM does not preserve upstream released tarball > timestamp. Good if you use wget and download tarball and package in SRPM. OK, I redownloaded with wget and the tarball now has the original timestamp. > 2)To preserve timestamps from files being copied from upstream tarball use > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" Interesting, I've never seen this one mentioned in the guidelines. OK, done. > 3) Drop following from SPEC > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils > as per said at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef I see. I was confused by obsolete instructions in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewMIMESystem I have copied the snippet from ScriptletSnippets and fixed the wiki page NewMIMESystem too. > 4)Use scriptlet of update-desktop-database as per given at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef Done. (In reply to comment #3) > I can't see poppler-glib-devel on F8 True. poppler-glib-devel was split from poppler-devel in Rawhide. I didn't originally plan to push the package to F8, but I have now made a conditional special case in BuildRequires to make it build on F8 too. Updated files: http://michich.fedorapeople.org/epdfview/epdfview.spec http://michich.fedorapeople.org/epdfview/epdfview-0.1.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 12:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151257.m1FCvabd016062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 sereinity at online.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sereinity at online.fr ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-15 07:57 EST ------- Ok, it builds under Mock and it does run. Rpmlint have many error and warning :s Some issues that should be fixed: - The licence field isn't correct - the upstream isn't used - gettext is only a BuildRequire - use local corectly - /usr/share/blueproximity/proximity.glade is executable - name of the icon on the .desktop isn't correct - the package own /usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/ and many other files MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package : -- src.rpm blueproximity.src:22: W: setup-not-quiet blueproximity.src: W: no-%build-section blueproximity.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 5) blueproximity.src: E: description-line-too-long This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). blueproximity.src: W: invalid-license GPL -- noarch.rpm blueproximity.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/blueproximity/proximity.glade blueproximity.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). blueproximity.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo blueproximity.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/blueproximity.mo + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. + MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. + MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. + MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. + MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: + SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. + SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. (i686 and x86_64) ~ SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. (not tested on ppc and pcc64) + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. + SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. + SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. + SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. + SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] New: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/openclipart.spec Source0: http://www.openclipart.org/downloads/0.18/openclipart-0.18-svgonly.tar.bz2 Description: Open Clip Art Library Open Clip Art Gallery contains thousand of SVG vector images that can be freely used. SVG files can be opened in various tools including Inkscape vector graphics editor, OpenOffice.org and Firefox web browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151422.m1FEMIlq032693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-15 09:22 EST ------- RPMLint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151421.m1FEL2CD009451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicubunu at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-15 09:21 EST ------- Sorry for not linking to the SRPM, I just don't have bandwidth to upload it now. Nicu: You're involved with Open Clipart and therefore adding you to Cc: since I believe you can answer some questions and provide valuable comments. While I believe the package to be compilant with the guidelines and therefore good enough to become part of Fedora now, it might need some changes and improvements in future: 1.) Upstream release is old. What would be the best way to keep the package up to date -- is there a public cvs that snapshots could be grabbed from? Nicu: Any information on new upstream release that is being worked on? 2.) Do we need a PNGs (presumably in separate subpackage) as some other distributors do? I don't believe so, but second opinion is welcomed. 3.) Integration. Would integration to gtk file open dialog be sufficient? Can it be done with a gnome VFS module? Is there a simpler way even, such as system-wide gtk-bookmarks? 4.) Which tools have to integrate well? Inkscape. OpenOffice.org. Some others? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151432.m1FEWP9a011395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-15 09:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift-20071226-3.src.rpm All addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151447.m1FElq6F004967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 langel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |langel at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:48:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151448.m1FEm9Q4014644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-15 09:48 EST ------- I will do the review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 14:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] New: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hg.lewk.org/TurboFlot/raw-file/59d7c20ba8f2/python-turboflot.spec SRPM URL: http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.5/T/TurboFlot/python-turboflot-0.0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A TurboGears widget for Flot, which is a pure Javascript plotting library for jQuery. It produces graphical plots of arbitrary datasets on-the-fly client-side. The focus is on simple usage (all settings are optional), attractive looks and interactive features like zooming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151505.m1FF5ED9018730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2008-02-15 10:05 EST ------- Ping. We have to do something with the "winbind/winbindd" issue. All three init scripts need to comply with LSB standard (headers and exit codes). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151520.m1FFKS2E012282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:20 EST ------- Thanks Lillian. FWIW, here's a new release with minor improvements... http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.8-1.fc8.src.rpm http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:29:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226387] Merge Review: samba In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151529.m1FFTjfm023235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226387 ------- Additional Comments From ssorce at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:29 EST ------- I am awaiting 3.2.0pre2 to appear to make a these changes. I will also try to check LSB compliance at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151533.m1FFX20b024015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:33 EST ------- There are only a couple of issues I found. Please read the review below. With these problems assessed/fixed, the package is approved. Why are *.h files in /usr/lib/libffi-2.99.8/include and not /usr/include? ------- rpmlint: libffi-devel.i686: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Verify this is ok. Packaging Guidelines 1. Naming ok 2. Legal 1. Licensing 2. Shareware 3. Patents 4. Emulators 5. Binary Firmware ok 3. No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries None. 4. Writing a package from scratch Done. 5. Modifying an existing package NA 6. Filesystem Layout 1. Libexecdir ok 7. Use rpmlint 1. Rpmlint Errors See above. 8. Changelogs correct. 9. Tags None. 10. BuildRoot tag 1. Prepping BuildRoot For %install Done. 11. Requires 1. PreReq 2. File Dependencies ok. 12. BuildRequires ok. 13. Summary and description Can you add more to the summary? 14. Encoding Fine. 15. Documentation ok. 16. Compiler flags ok. 17. Debuginfo packages ok. 18. Exclusion of Static Libraries .la's removed. good. 19. Duplication of system libraries none. 20. Beware of Rpath 21. Configuration files 22. Init Scripts 23. Desktop files 24. Macros ok 25. Handling Locale Files NA 26. Timestamps 27. Parallel make 28. Scriptlets requirements 29. Running scriptlets only in certain situations 30. Scriplets are only allowed to write in certain directories 31. Conditional dependencies none. 32. Build packages with separate user accounts 33. Relocatable packages 34. Code Vs Content 35. File and Directory Ownership ok. 36. Users and Groups 37. Web Applications 38. Conflicts none. 39. No External Kernel Modules - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Done. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Works on i686. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. Done. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Done. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. /usr/lib/libffi-2.99.4/include/ffi.h /usr/lib/libffi-2.99.4/include/ffitarget.h Why aren't these headers installed in /usr/include/ ? - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Must add Requires: pkgconfig - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. done. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:35:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151535.m1FFZUKf024610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 nicubunu at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From nicubunu at gmail.com 2008-02-15 10:35 EST ------- Yeah, I am *almost* a founder of OCAL and one of the top content creators, thanks for adding me. There is a long story, so please bear with me: at first we started OCAL without any infrastructure, only a form where people can upload their contribution, so the only way to share the content was monthly tarball releases. Then we got a browsing interface, where was possible to access the images included in the latest release, with newer uploads kept in an "incoming" area and included only at the next release. The 0.18 release (October 2005) was the last using this system, the interface broke and we didn't have the developers available to fix it, the website went on hiatus for several months. We tried a 0.19 release but it didn't got finished. Then we changed the infrastructure, migrating to ccHost which didn't provide an easy way to easily import the old images, so here are we now: 7000+ images in the old system (the 0.18 and 0.19 release) and 6000+ new images in the current interface (ccHost). There is a move to *slowly* import them by hand (one by one, for 7000+ images...) So back to your questions: 1.) 0.18 release is indeed old, but is the latest and there are no plans to do another in the near future. AFAIK, there is no easy way to provide a package in the current interface, but I will take the question to the mailing list. 2.) I agree about not providing PNGs, they are thumbnails with a small size (128x128), so not really useful as stand alone images and Nautilus will display the thumbnails for SVG. Maybe if we include some tools like TuxPaint and find a way for them to use the PNG version of the clipart images... but I don't think this is a priority. 3.) I am not sure about that. I guess integration with the gtk file dialog is a good start. IIRC the 0.18 release has the files organized in a directory structure based on keywords so it can be accessed easily. 4.) Tools: - Inkscape is the primary user of those images, having a bookmark in the gtk dialog would be good enough IMO. Note that the upcoming 0.46 provides a "Import from OCAL" dialog *but*: it can access only the images from the new repository (not the ones included in the 0.18 release), the dialog is awful (both as interface and functionality) and it work only online; - OpenOffice.org can't open natively open SVG files (there are plans to to so, but I don't know about the targets, ask Caolan about that). There is a 3-rd party plugin which can import SVG files, but it is not included in Fedora, is written in Java and it used to not work with the free Java (I don't know about IcedTead) - again, perhaps some imput from Caolan would be useful (I added him in CC); - GIMP can make use of those clipart images, I insert them with drag and drop from Nautilus, but I believe a bookmark in the gtk open dialog would suffice (and it would suffice for a lot of other gtk applications like glabels); - it is not part of our default install, so not that important, but Scribus is another great user of the clipart. Since it uses the qt framework, I am personally *that* biased and have not used it in a long time (and have not it installed) so I am not able to comment much about it (a bookmark in the KDE/qt open dialog?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151549.m1FFn6KI027180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Why are *.h files in /usr/lib/libffi-2.99.8/include and not /usr/include? Because they are platform dependent, hence not-multilib clean. The x86 headers are different from the x86-64 headers. People should use pkg-config to find the right headers. > libffi-devel.i686: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > Verify this is ok. Yes, this is fine. It's just the .so symlink and the header files. > 13. Summary and description > Can you add more to the summary? Ok. > Must add Requires: pkgconfig Ok. Updated files here.... http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi-2.99.9-1.fc8.src.rpm http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/libffi.spec Is this approved? Spot - if it's OK with you, I would like to (co)maintain this package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151552.m1FFqiHj018640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:52 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:56:41 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151556.m1FFufs2019557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-15 10:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #22) > > OK, I realize we have leak in the FPG, people seem to be keen to exploit. > Yes, I consider this package review/submission as a provocation, trying to challenge the FGP. The FPC and rpm missed to specify the precise syntax of rpm.specs. > > IMHO, this package name should be rejected, because > > a) It technically means asking for trouble wrt. tools processing rpms/rpm-spec > > (rpmbuild, rpm, yum, apt, yumex, createrepo, db-formats etc.). > > I am sure at least some of them are not able to process such names. > > What's asking for trouble is continuing to ignore UTF-8 handling problems in > low-level rpm tools. My view is differently: It is a matter of specification/standardization of the "rpm.spec - syntax". > All our software stack has been moving to UTF-8 for years, Yes, and? ... this doesn't mean exploing the technical possibilities is necessary useful. (Think about using non-7bit application names). > > b) It is user unfriendly: You can't expect people to be able to type "arbitrary > > exotic characters" on their keyboard. > > This is not a problem. Well, an acute accent probably is not much of a problem for French folks, but ... would you think the same wrt. non ASCII-chars of other languages? At least I would be facing the such issues, if packages names (or worse applicaition) were named in East European, Middle and Far East charsets. I would not be able find them on my keyboard. I also would be likely not to be able in GUI tools because I would not have the fonts installed. > The GUI tools do not care, and the package provides an > ascii-7 name alias for CLI users. These aren't of help, when e.g. ftp'ing a package. The converse would be applicable: ASCII-file/package-name, utf-8-provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 15:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151558.m1FFwBea028967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat.com 2008-02-15 10:58 EST ------- ffi.h still could go into /usr/include, just ffitarget.h is target specific, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151605.m1FG5REF021960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-15 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > ffi.h still could go into /usr/include, just ffitarget.h is target specific, right? No, unfortunately that's not how it works today. This could probably be changed (like in spot's wrapper headers), but I'm not sure it's worth the effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151620.m1FGK1ud024564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:19:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:19:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151619.m1FGJOgF024489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-15 11:19 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libffi Short Description: A portable foreign function interface library Owners: green Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:20:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151620.m1FGKWPD001816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-15 11:20 EST ------- Well, for 0.6.5-1: * bconf - Your usage of bconf conditional treatment is not right. Please to the following link for example. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/gimp/devel/gimp.spec * BuildRequires - It seems dotconf is not in Fedora yet. If you want to use dotconf, you have to submit another review request for dotconf. * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing a rpm are owned by some package. For example, the directory %{_sysconfdir}/peech-dispatcher itself is not owned by any packages. * libtool .la files - must be removed. * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific dependency - The dependency between subpackages must be EVR (not only Version) specific. * /sbin/ldconfig - (Usually, and actually for this package) calling /sbin/ldconfig is not needed for -devel package. * Static archive - Packaging static archive is forbidden when providing shared libraries, please remove them. Also please check if configure accepts --disable-static option. * Info file - Files under %_infodir are automatically marked as %doc. * Changelog - Please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs - Especially using %date macro in your way is forbidden. In this way %date changes every time you rebuild this srpm, which changes the old changelog entry - One %changelog must be written in one spec file. i.e. writting %changelog for every subpackage is not allowed. These %changelog's must be unified. (In reply to comment #5) > Also how will I distribute the init scripts since they are not part of the > original package? As a patch? - You can add it as other sources like %SOURCE1. ? symlink which seems modules - BTW does this package work well if symlink .so under %_libdir/speech-dispatcher are not in main package? These type of files are usually dlopen'ed and not aimed for being used from other packages (i.e. not aimed for being in -devel package). %defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * %post/%postun dependency for /sbin/install-info - is missing for -doc-en, -doc-cs (please check the section "Texinfo" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) ? By the way do you really want to create -doc-en, -doc-cs subpackages for only info files? ! Please change release number of your spec every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151626.m1FGQfiP003138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 than at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo? ------- Additional Comments From than at redhat.com 2008-02-15 11:26 EST ------- >Comment: > * fix utf-8 with iconv(1) fixed > * Both Summary and description should be reworked, they don't match the >package as of today. what is the problem here? could you please give more infos? >+ guidelines > * changelog is 10 years old (sic!), could be a be shorter? the old changelog should be remained >* disttag is missing it's fixed > * source url is wrong, see: >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 it's fixed >* I prefer this buildroot: > %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) i prefer %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > * add %{?_smp_mflags} to make fixed > * preserve timestamp on man files (cp -p/install -p) fixed > * don't use %makeinstall fixed >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-fcaf3e6fcbd51194a5d0dbcfbdd2fcb7791dd002 > * don't shiop INSTALL >the rest seems ok. fixed >+ License: ok >+ American English: ok, however as noted the summary and description is >outdated >and should be fixed. any idea how to fix it? >Then a issue maybe outside the scope of this review, I really like to see >etags >enabled and >included. Perhaps in a ctags-etags subpackage like this: > it doesn't make sense to add redundant etags here. wont fix i built new ctags-5.7 in rawhide. could you please check again. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 16:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151639.m1FGdsbT005779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-15 11:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I have added a copy of http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt > Maybe should I add a copy of the GPLv3, as the licensing is GPLv2+ (with an > exception for CGAL). > I really meant the license information from the top of the .cpp file so that people know what the exception is - though it doesn't apply in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151708.m1FH83lT011119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 12:08 EST ------- Shouldn't the short description here be something like: "Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151710.m1FHAULh002545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 12:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:19:13 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151719.m1FHJDQw012936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-15 12:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > OK, I realize we have leak in the FPG, people seem to be keen to exploit. > > > Yes, I consider this package review/submission as a provocation, trying to > challenge the FGP. > > The FPC and rpm missed to specify the precise syntax of rpm.specs. I'm sorry I have zip interest into going in rant mode. Please move hyperbolics somewhere else. > > > IMHO, this package name should be rejected, because > > > a) It technically means asking for trouble wrt. tools processing rpms/rpm-spec > > > (rpmbuild, rpm, yum, apt, yumex, createrepo, db-formats etc.). > > > I am sure at least some of them are not able to process such names. > > > > What's asking for trouble is continuing to ignore UTF-8 handling problems in > > low-level rpm tools. > My view is differently: It is a matter of specification/standardization of the > "rpm.spec - syntax". As noted in one of the first comments this was politely discussed with Seith Vidal among others so don't be so quick to condemn me for not following the hypothetical rule you assume will be written down someday. Plus you know what they say about retroactivity of the law. > > All our software stack has been moving to UTF-8 for years, > Yes, and? ... this doesn't mean exploing the technical possibilities is > necessary useful. (Think about using non-7bit application names). > > > > b) It is user unfriendly: You can't expect people to be able to type "arbitrary > > > exotic characters" on their keyboard. > > > > This is not a problem. > Well, an acute accent probably is not much of a problem for French folks, but > ... would you think the same wrt. non ASCII-chars of other languages? Please don't invent strawmen. It's up to projects to choose names that play well with their intended audience, and you're not well placed to decide here without knowing their aims or their users they would be better served by ascii-7 names. We already have a lot of parts in Fedora which are totally useless to people that do not read a specific scripts, and this is good (globalization has limits), so pretending everything needs an ascii-7 transliterated name is stretching things quite a bit. > At least I would be facing the such issues, if packages names (or worse > applicaition) were named in East European, Middle and Far East charsets. > > I would not be able find them on my keyboard. I also would be likely not to be > able in GUI tools because I would not have the fonts installed. And you would likely not have any use for them. Projects with a global reach do not use names in East European, Middle and Far East scripts. > > The GUI tools do not care, and the package provides an > > ascii-7 name alias for CLI users. > These aren't of help, when e.g. ftp'ing a package. Manual ftp-ing of packages has not been our primary distribution method for years, and anyway rpm does not care about the file name so limiting metadata just for filenames is a red herring. > The converse would be applicable: ASCII-file/package-name, utf-8-provides. This falls against the choices pretty much every other app did. You don't expose low-level ascii-limited strings to users and hide the correct utf-8 variant. And package name is a very important user-exposed string. Also you should realise this would win you little, as the problems if there are likely lurk rpm db side and will be largely the same either way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151724.m1FHO5mf013800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 12:24 EST ------- FYI, it's better if the reviewer sets the fedora-review flag to + to approve a package so we can be sure who approved it, etc... No big deal since it's clear this was approved, but please do keep it in mind moving forward. Also, should spot be listed as co-maintainer? I guess he can add himself when he gets back... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151735.m1FHZAI9006608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-15 12:35 EST ------- For 1.2-3: * As I wrote some missing dependency for -devel subpackage as "Example", it seems that there are some more missing dependencies for -devel package - cegui-devel - zlib-devel (I guess adding more 2 BR listed above should be enough) * It seems that adding INSTALL="install -p" to make install actually works http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=426911 ! This weekend I will try to check license issues (if any) for this package (more than 10000 files needs checking) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151753.m1FHr3Md018938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 12:53 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I have changed the license as suggested and I have "unduplicated" the README %doc file, so now only the LICENSE file is duplicated in both packages. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cryptokit-1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm This is the diff to the specfile from before: diff -u -r1.1 ocaml-cryptokit.spec --- ocaml-cryptokit.spec 12 Feb 2008 11:35:13 -0000 1.1 +++ ocaml-cryptokit.spec 15 Feb 2008 17:50:35 -0000 @@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ Name: ocaml-cryptokit Version: 1.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions Group: Development/Libraries -License: LGPLv2 +License: LGPLv2 with exceptions URL: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/software.html Source0: http://caml.inria.fr/distrib/bazar-ocaml/cryptokit-1.3.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc README LICENSE Changes doc +%doc LICENSE Changes doc %if %opt %{_libdir}/ocaml/*.a %{_libdir}/ocaml/*.cmxa @@ -109,5 +109,9 @@ %changelog +* Fri Feb 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.3-2 +- Don't duplicate the README file in both packages. +- Change the license to LGPLv2 with exceptions. + * Tue Feb 12 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.3-1 - Initial RPM release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] New: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sergio.pasra at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/cloudy.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/cloudy-07.02.01-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Most of the quantitative information we have about the cosmos comes from spectroscopy. In many cases the light we analyze was produced by atoms in the first generations of stars and galaxies. The spectra are produced by dilute gas where such properties as the gas kinetic temperature, chemical state, level of ionization, and level populations, are determined by a host of microphysical processes rather than by a single temperature. Analytical solutions are seldom possible and computer solutions are needed to understand their physical properties. Numerical simulations make it possible to understand complex physical environments starting from first principles. Cloudy is designed to do exactly this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:56:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428000] Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151756.m1FHuEqP019662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428000 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151759.m1FHxJDq010598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 12:59 EST ------- The changes look good. Even duplicating the license file isn't necessary, but I don't block on it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151759.m1FHxiNv010676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 Bug 431098 depends on bug 431633, which changed state. Bug 431633 Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 17:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151759.m1FHxhoN010643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From green at redhat.com 2008-02-15 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Also, should spot be listed as co-maintainer? I guess he can add himself when he > gets back... I would have done this , but I wasn't sure what his FAS account name was. How would I find something like that out? > > cvs done. Thanks It's built for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 18:07:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431633] Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151807.m1FI7kiB022039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 13:07 EST ------- You can look for a maintainers FAS account name in: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/dump-group.cgi?group=cvsextras&format=plain (note that you do need to use your account/password to access this list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 18:08:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:08:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430073] Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151808.m1FI8roh012982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-igraph - Python bindings for igraph https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430073 ndbecker2 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 18:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151849.m1FInCZV029234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 13:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-cryptokit Short Description: OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151900.m1FJ0g1V031521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 14:00 EST ------- That was a missing BR (ocaml-camlp4-devel). I have checked this with the new OCaml in Rawhide (3.10.1) and it builds, so here we go ... Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pxp-1.2.0test1-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433030] New: Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433030 Summary: Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/findwild/findwild.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/findwild/findwild-09-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Findwild is (yet another) free open source Linux program to search for files. It works quite differently from the other programs you may have used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:13:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433029] New: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433029 Summary: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/fotox/fotox.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/fotox/fotox-35-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Fotox is a free open-source Linux program for improving image files made with a digital camera. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:17:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433033] New: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433033 Summary: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz-15-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Picpuz is a free Linux "jigsaw puzzle" program. You can take almost any type of image file (jpeg, png, bmp ...) and scramble it into many pieces which you can then reassemble using the mouse. You can control the puzzle size and number of pieces (tens to thousands). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151934.m1FJY8FV005110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-02-15 14:34 EST ------- New SRPM is blueproximity-1.2.4.orig-1.fc8.src in the same url. The Spec file has been updated. I really did not get the locale stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151933.m1FJXH84027880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 14:33 EST ------- Without the netcgi1 patch I can't get cduce to compile: Checking for package camlp4... ok Checking for package num... ok Checking for package pcre... ok Checking for package ulex... ok Checking for package cgi... ocamlfind: Package `cgi' not found failed ! *** Fatal error: Required package is not available error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44682 (%prep) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 19:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802151944.m1FJisVc029870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-15 14:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce.spec SRPM URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce-0.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm * Fri Feb 15 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.5.1-1 - New upstream release 0.5.1. - New OCaml 3.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 20:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152016.m1FKGHJR013861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-02-15 15:16 EST ------- Thanks for the quick check. Here is the updtae that puts the headers in the right place. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06-0.6.1-4.fc8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06.spec I don't understand the reasoning for dropping compat- from the package name. Why is 'compat-' not necessary for packages that provide a -devel subpackage? As far as I know, ballz is the only dependency. I agree that porting ballz would be ideal, but I have not had any time to look at porting, and I know that you've been pretty busy lately, so this compat package seemed the quickest way to work around it. It's probably still a good idea to keep this compat package, however, in case there are any users who have compiled 3rd-party applications against the library on their systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 20:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152018.m1FKI8E6004314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-02-15 15:18 EST ------- Gianluca, I guess you're right. However I'll need some time to get this done as many spec files and subsequent package review requests are needed thus I'm removing this request for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 20:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152027.m1FKRC8Y007470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-02-15 15:27 EST ------- Thanks for the input :) > * bconf > - Your usage of bconf conditional treatment is not right. > Please to the following link for example. > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/gimp/devel/gimp.spec I tried to use this approach for conditional build but somehow was unsuccessful. If this approach is absolutely needed, I will spend more time and fix it. (At this moment my attempt is commented out for your reference) > * BuildRequires > - It seems dotconf is not in Fedora yet. > If you want to use dotconf, you have to submit another review request > for dotconf. I am on it, thank you for letting me know about the issue. > * Directory ownership issue > - Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing > a rpm are owned by some package. > For example, the directory %{_sysconfdir}/peech-dispatcher itself is > not owned by any packages. Am i supposed to set the Directory permissions to a particular value? If that is the case I applied the same permissions as was done for GIMP. > * libtool .la files > - must be removed. Done. I was getting a build error, and for that reason i had to add the macro %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0. > * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific dependency > - The dependency between subpackages must be EVR (not only Version) > specific. Added, I hope it has been done correctly. > * /sbin/ldconfig > - (Usually, and actually for this package) calling > /sbin/ldconfig is not needed for -devel package. Commented out. > * Static archive > - Packaging static archive is forbidden when providing shared > libraries, please remove them. > Also please check if configure accepts --disable-static option. Removed the static libraries. The present script when run with --without static_libs works fine, and disables static libs. > * Info file > - Files under %_infodir are automatically marked as %doc. I ve removed the %doc tag. > * Changelog > - Please check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs > - Especially using %date macro in your way is forbidden. > In this way %date changes every time you rebuild this srpm, > which changes the old changelog entry Fixed, I am now using the date format as mentioned on the website. > - One %changelog must be written in one spec file. > i.e. writting %changelog for every subpackage is not allowed. > These %changelog's must be unified. Done. > > (In reply to comment #5) > > Also how will I distribute the init scripts since they are not part of the > > original package? As a patch? > - You can add it as other sources like %SOURCE1. Okay, thanks, I think it would be best to add this once you are happy with the present state of the SPEC file. > > ? symlink which seems modules > - BTW does this package work well if symlink .so under > %_libdir/speech-dispatcher are not in main package? > These type of files are usually dlopen'ed and not aimed > for being used from other packages (i.e. not aimed for > being in -devel package). I have moved .so files to main package now, there was an issue of dangling pointers reported by rpmlint tool when the .so files were placed in the devel package. > %defattr > - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) I ve applied 0755 as directory permissions, I am not absolutely clear what you mean by the package owning the directory. > * %post/%postun dependency for /sbin/install-info > - is missing for -doc-en, -doc-cs (please check > the section "Texinfo" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) Are you referring to these? Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/service /sbin/install-info > ? By the way do you really want to create -doc-en, -doc-cs > subpackages for only info files? I ve merged them to a single documentation package at this point. > > ! > Please change release number of your spec every time you modify > your spec file to avoid confusion. Sorry! I have started doing that now, and also maintaining a proper change log. I suppose at this stage the issues that need to be resolved : 1]Directory ownership 2]BCond 3]Dotconf packages 4]init scripts - will put the patch as advised by you 5]python packages refuse to get installed correctly. They get installed in a "build" directory within BUILD and rpmbuild has no way to pick them and put them in a python package. Thanks as always for being so helpful :) Hemant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 20:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152057.m1FKv9oY021440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-15 15:57 EST ------- ( > * Both Summary and description should be reworked, they don't match the > >package as of today. > > what is the problem here? could you please give more infos? The summary and description only talks about C code, however ctags now supports a lot of program languages: http://ctags.sourceforge.net/languages.html This fact should be stated in the summary and description, from the the website. Something along the lines of the rpm from the website maybe: Summary: Exuberant Ctags - a multi-language source code indexing tool Desc: Exuberant Ctags generates an index (or tag) file of language objects found in source files for many popular programming languages. This index makes it easy for text editors and other tools to locate the indexed items. Exuberant Ctags improves on traditional ctags because of its multilanguage support, its ability for the user to define new languages searched by regular expressions, and its ability to generate emacs-style TAGS files. Install ctags if you are going to use your system for programming. > the old changelog should be remained Ok. > i prefer %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Fine. > >+ License: ok The guidelines has changed since the initial review, the license is in fact not valid, please have a look at this issue. > >+ American English: ok, however as noted the summary and description is > >outdated > >and should be fixed. > > any idea how to fix it? See over? > >Then a issue maybe outside the scope of this review, I really like to see > >etags > >enabled and > >included. Perhaps in a ctags-etags subpackage like this: > > > it doesn't make sense to add redundant etags here. > wont fix I don't see the problem in including a ctags-etags subpackage for users that will swap GNU Emacs / XEmacs etags for Exuberant Ctags etags. I have created a ctags package with a ctags-etags subpackage. The correct alternatives commands are used. A patch is included as attachment. Please reconsider for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 21:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152100.m1FL0PlQ014755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-15 16:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295038) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295038&action=view) patch to ctags.spec to include ctage-etags package. patch for comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 21:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433045] Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152101.m1FL1lSk015012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433045 akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |351441 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 21:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351441] Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152101.m1FL1mLO015040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351441 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide akahl at iconmobile.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 21:02:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266841] Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152102.m1FL2d0j015248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 ------- Additional Comments From akahl at iconmobile.com 2008-02-15 16:02 EST ------- Hi Jason, sorry for taking so long. I've realized both packages are even completely independent from each other so I'm facing a new problem now: Who owns /usr/share/pear/propel? The generator component has its own review request as Bug 433045 now, if you're interested. Updated Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_runtime.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_runtime-1.2.1-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 21:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433045] New: Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433045 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-propel_generator - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akahl at iconmobile.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_generator.spec SRPM URL: http://akahl.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-propel/php-pear-propel_generator-1.2.1-7.fc8.src.rpm Description: Propel is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5. It allows you to access your database using a set of objects, providing a simple API for storing and retrieving data. Propel allows you, the web application developer, to work with databases in the same way you work with other classes and objects in PHP. This package contains the generator component of Propel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 22:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] New: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: langel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/java-1.6.0-icedtea/java-1.6.0-icedtea.spec SRPM URL: http://langel.fedorapeople.org/java-1.6.0-icedtea/java-1.6.0-icedtea-1.6.0.0-0.1.b05.fc9.src.rpm Description: The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 22:23:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:23:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152223.m1FMN8iw013697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 langel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fitzsim at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 22:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:23:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152223.m1FMNcY8013796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 langel at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 22:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152246.m1FMksci018963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer at gmail.com 2008-02-15 17:46 EST ------- >From a packaging standpoint, Konrad did a great review. I'd be willing to sponsor Nadia for this. Consider it APPROVED. Nadia, please apply for sponsorship and I'll take care of that. Word of warning, rawhide has massive kernel churn. This package seems like it might need frequent updating because of that, so please be prepared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 22:55:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:55:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152255.m1FMt3Vs009989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-15 17:55 EST ------- Is there a reason we're going to be shipping two versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 23:21:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432701] Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152321.m1FNL6OD026025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ksig - A graphical application to manage multiple email signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432701 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-15 18:21 EST ------- Thanks! Imported and build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=36504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 23:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152330.m1FNUHaF027493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-15 18:30 EST ------- New revision http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/sarai-fonts-1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Fixed the two issues pointed out. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 15 23:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802152338.m1FNcvwu028777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 18:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 00:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160003.m1G03elw022285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 19:03 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. See below - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 57dd2731e05de80b04077e5e2396b1a8 greyhounds-0.8-pre-alpha.tar.bz2 57dd2731e05de80b04077e5e2396b1a8 greyhounds-0.8-pre-alpha.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Not that it matters much, but upstream uses 'pre-alpha' instead of 'prealpha' 2. Can you ask upstream to clarify the license? The README file has "The game is GPL-licensed." None of the source files contain any licensing information. That would seem to imply "GPL+" (ie, any version of the GPL). 3. Oddly, the Source0 url should probibly be: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/byghound/%{name}-%{version}-pre-alpha.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 00:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160037.m1G0bqJl028612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 19:37 EST ------- Mark as Review done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 00:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160035.m1G0ZaRd006736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 19:35 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: GPLv2+ (from source) %doc License: N/A Spec file language: English Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F7 FAILED (not targeted), - F8 OK, - rawhide OK, - EL5 FAILED (not targeted) Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK - .desktop file: Upstream Make (Automake) does not call desktop-file-install Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 00:42:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160042.m1G0gfRj007993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 19:42 EST ------- Thanks for the tip but I still haven't been able to get it to actually work. I wanted to do that before I continued with the packaging but I'm unable to. Closing the review for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 00:45:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160045.m1G0jZiw030441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-15 19:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fldigi Short Description: Digital modem program for Linux Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-8 InitialCC: sindrebp Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 01:06:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] New: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/unixcw.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/unixcw-2.3-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: The UnixCW utilities add a general purpose CW library to your system, and a small set of applications based around this library. These applications form a Morse code tutor suite, useful for Amateur and Marine radio operators. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 01:15:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] New: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/libax25.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/libax25-0.0.11-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: libax25 is a library for ham radio applications that use the ax25 protocol. Included are routines to do ax25 address parsing, common ax25 application config file parsing, etc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 01:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160125.m1G1PpGi016133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 20:25 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK (from source code, COPYING file has GPLv2, upstream .spec just says GPL) %doc License: OK (COPYING file in %doc, no LICENSE file) Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F7: OK - F8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: - -devel package: - Requires base: OK - pkgconfig: OK Locales: N/A Shared libs: OK Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: OK Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: OK Library files: OK Devel requires base package: OK .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 01:30:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160130.m1G1U14j005795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-15 20:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unixcw Short Description: Shared library for Morse programs Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrebp Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 01:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:45:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160145.m1G1jMAu019342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 20:45 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: LPGLv2+ (from source files: `grep -rin -A 2 lesser *` inside the source tree shows, COPYING has LGPLv2.1) %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F7 OK - F8 OK - rawhide OK - EL5 OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~49K) - -devel package: FAILED (see below) Locales: N/A Shared libs: OK Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: FAILED (see below) Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: OK Devel requires base package: OK .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK == Below shows that the base package lacks a couple of files (man pages for example), whereas the -devel package picks them up. [jmeeuwen at unity05 fedora-ham]$ rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/fedora-8-i386/result/libax25-devel-0.0.11-2.fc8.i386.rpm /usr/include/netax25 /usr/include/netax25/ax25io.h /usr/include/netax25/axconfig.h /usr/include/netax25/axlib.h /usr/include/netax25/daemon.h /usr/include/netax25/kernel_ax25.h /usr/include/netax25/kernel_netrom.h /usr/include/netax25/kernel_rose.h /usr/include/netax25/mheard.h /usr/include/netax25/nrconfig.h /usr/include/netax25/procutils.h /usr/include/netax25/rsconfig.h /usr/include/netax25/ttyutils.h /usr/lib/libax25.so /usr/lib/libax25io.so /usr/share/doc/libax25-devel-0.0.11 /usr/share/doc/libax25-devel-0.0.11/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/libax25-devel-0.0.11/COPYING /usr/share/doc/libax25-devel-0.0.11/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/libax25-devel-0.0.11/README /usr/share/man/man3/ax25.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/rose.3.gz /usr/share/man/man5/axports.5.gz /usr/share/man/man5/nrports.5.gz /usr/share/man/man5/rsports.5.gz [jmeeuwen at unity05 fedora-ham]$ rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/fedora-8-i386/result/libax25-0.0.11-2.fc8.i386.rpm /usr/lib/libax25.so.0 /usr/lib/libax25.so.0.0.0 /usr/lib/libax25io.so.0 /usr/lib/libax25io.so.0.0.0 /usr/share/doc/libax25-0.0.11 /usr/share/doc/libax25-0.0.11/COPYING /usr/share/doc/libax25-0.0.11/README == Replace the %files sections in the .spec with: (and things should be OK) %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README %{_libdir}/*.so.* %{_mandir}/man?/* %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/* %{_libdir}/*.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:02:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160202.m1G22gCX011369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or| |g) | ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-15 21:02 EST ------- updated Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/libax25.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/libax25-0.0.11-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160208.m1G2808E012625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-15 21:07 EST ------- Issues confirmed fixed, builds OK and files end up in the right package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:09:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160209.m1G29p1B013328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-15 21:09 EST ------- curl-7.17.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:09:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160209.m1G29u9k013402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |7.17.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160211.m1G2BFwJ025202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-15 21:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libax25 Short Description: AX.25 library for hamradio applications Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrebp Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160241.m1G2fYDu020609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-15 21:41 EST ------- Now libffi is imported, but it seems that this package needs adjusting for new (?) libffi. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=431145 > - Only intended for F9 or higher targets (aka, this won't build right on F8 or older). In this case I would appreciate it if you would write the URL of the result of koji scratch build against dist-f9 target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 02:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 255721] Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160245.m1G2jDDl032334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-rrdtool - RRDtool module for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=255721 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160302.m1G32FaM024860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160313.m1G3DwHj005464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 22:13 EST ------- I see this is assigned to Paul but he hasn't made any comments and fedora-review is not set. What's up? Is this currently under review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160331.m1G3Vs81030613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 22:31 EST ------- I guess anyone who has an opinion has had a chance to comment here or on the mailing list, and at this point I'd approve it if you drop the unnecessary gawk dependency. OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160328.m1G3SPHr029713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 22:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160334.m1G3Y4Zw030949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 22:34 EST ------- sindrebp doesn't seem to be a account in the fedora account system... otherwise, cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:37:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160337.m1G3b3YW009900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-15 22:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 03:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160358.m1G3w8FS013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 22:58 EST ------- It's "sindrepb" Sindre Pedersen Bj?rdal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 04:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160403.m1G436M8015363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-15 23:03 EST ------- Usually section 3 man files are for the explanation of functions and should be in -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 04:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160405.m1G45Yna005564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-15 23:05 EST ------- - When installing desktop files, desktop-file-install must be called ("desktop-file-install usage" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 04:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160405.m1G45auc016010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-15 23:05 EST ------- Looks like this needs an update for ocaml 3.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 05:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:08:29 -0500 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BBug_261881=5D_Review_Request=3A_=C3=C2=A9colie?= =?iso-8859-1?q?r-court-fonts_-_=C3=E2=B0colier_court_fonts?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160508.m1G58TBA015729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ??colier-court-fonts - ??colier court fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261881 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-02-16 00:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > (In reply to comment #24) > > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > OK, I realize we have leak in the FPG, people seem to be keen to exploit. > > > > > Yes, I consider this package review/submission as a provocation, trying to > > challenge the FGP. > > > > The FPC and rpm missed to specify the precise syntax of rpm.specs. > > I'm sorry I have zip interest into going in rant mode. Please move hyperbolics > somewhere else. What is ranting about this? rpm.spec don't have a syntax specification, the FPG doesn't cover this case and this package submission challenges both. > > And you would likely not have any use for them. Projects with a global reach do > not use names in East European, Middle and Far East scripts. OK, so this font package is addressing the French audience only? You might not be aware how exotic even comparatively far spread things like an acute accent is to many users? My last name contains one, I am well aware about the fact how much it is. Now extend this to other charsets and languages. > > > The GUI tools do not care, and the package provides an > > > ascii-7 name alias for CLI users. > > These aren't of help, when e.g. ftp'ing a package. > > Manual ftp-ing of packages has not been our primary distribution method for > years, ftp'ing and using other command tools are still the only applicable method in many use cases, e.g. in case of broken repositories, broken network access etc. I'll bring this to the FPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 05:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225671] Merge Review: curl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160555.m1G5t6SJ023629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: curl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225671 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-02-16 00:55 EST ------- Paul, I applied changes you propose in rawhide, thanks for noticing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:03:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160703.m1G73cma002700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johan at x-tnd.be Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2008-02-16 02:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPMs. + source file are ok. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + BuildRequires are proper. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160721.m1G7LxdI015824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 johan at x-tnd.be changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From johan at x-tnd.be 2008-02-16 02:21 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. + rpmlint warnings for RPM should be safely ignored + source file are ok. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + BuildRequires are proper. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160734.m1G7YmJP007105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-02-16 02:34 EST ------- Hi, I have updated the SPEC file to use the latest speech-dispatcher release. The SPEC file can be accessed at : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher.spec The SRPM can be accessed at : http://www.nsitonline.in/hemant/stuff/speechd-rpm/speech-dispatcher-0.6.6-1.fc7.src.rpm - Python packages are finally getting built. (However I must force --prefix to the correct value to make this work. Otherwise the python packages get installed in %{_prefix} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix}) Thanks! Hemant (In reply to comment #7) > Thanks for the input :) > > > * bconf > > - Your usage of bconf conditional treatment is not right. > > Please to the following link for example. > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/gimp/devel/gimp.spec > > I tried to use this approach for conditional build but somehow was unsuccessful. > If this approach is absolutely needed, I will spend more time and fix it. (At > this moment my attempt is commented out for your reference) > > > * BuildRequires > > - It seems dotconf is not in Fedora yet. > > If you want to use dotconf, you have to submit another review request > > for dotconf. > > I am on it, thank you for letting me know about the issue. > > > * Directory ownership issue > > - Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing > > a rpm are owned by some package. > > For example, the directory %{_sysconfdir}/peech-dispatcher itself is > > not owned by any packages. > > Am i supposed to set the Directory permissions to a particular value? If that is > the case I applied the same permissions as was done for GIMP. > > > * libtool .la files > > - must be removed. > > Done. I was getting a build error, and for that reason i had to add the macro > %define _unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0. > > > * EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific dependency > > - The dependency between subpackages must be EVR (not only Version) > > specific. > > Added, I hope it has been done correctly. > > > * /sbin/ldconfig > > - (Usually, and actually for this package) calling > > /sbin/ldconfig is not needed for -devel package. > > Commented out. > > > * Static archive > > - Packaging static archive is forbidden when providing shared > > libraries, please remove them. > > Also please check if configure accepts --disable-static option. > > Removed the static libraries. The present script when run with --without > static_libs works fine, and disables static libs. > > > * Info file > > - Files under %_infodir are automatically marked as %doc. > > I ve removed the %doc tag. > > > * Changelog > > - Please check > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs > > - Especially using %date macro in your way is forbidden. > > In this way %date changes every time you rebuild this srpm, > > which changes the old changelog entry > > Fixed, I am now using the date format as mentioned on the website. > > > - One %changelog must be written in one spec file. > > i.e. writting %changelog for every subpackage is not allowed. > > These %changelog's must be unified. > > Done. > > > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > Also how will I distribute the init scripts since they are not part of the > > > original package? As a patch? > > - You can add it as other sources like %SOURCE1. > > Okay, thanks, I think it would be best to add this once you are happy with the > present state of the SPEC file. > > > > > ? symlink which seems modules > > - BTW does this package work well if symlink .so under > > %_libdir/speech-dispatcher are not in main package? > > These type of files are usually dlopen'ed and not aimed > > for being used from other packages (i.e. not aimed for > > being in -devel package). > > I have moved .so files to main package now, there was an issue of dangling > pointers reported by rpmlint tool when the .so files were placed in the devel > package. > > > %defattr > > - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > I ve applied 0755 as directory permissions, I am not absolutely clear what you > mean by the package owning the directory. > > > * %post/%postun dependency for /sbin/install-info > > - is missing for -doc-en, -doc-cs (please check > > the section "Texinfo" of > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) > > Are you referring to these? > Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/install-info > > Requires(preun): /sbin/service /sbin/install-info > > > > > ? By the way do you really want to create -doc-en, -doc-cs > > subpackages for only info files? > > I ve merged them to a single documentation package at this point. > > > > ! > > Please change release number of your spec every time you modify > > your spec file to avoid confusion. > > Sorry! I have started doing that now, and also maintaining a proper change log. > > I suppose at this stage the issues that need to be resolved : > > 1]Directory ownership > 2]BCond > 3]Dotconf packages > 4]init scripts - will put the patch as advised by you > 5]python packages refuse to get installed correctly. They get installed in a > "build" directory within BUILD and rpmbuild has no way to pick them and put them > in a python package. > > Thanks as always for being so helpful :) > > Hemant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433094] New: Review Request: watsup - System monitor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433094 Summary: Review Request: watsup - System monitor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/watsup/watsup.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/watsup/watsup-08-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Watsup monitors Linux system resources and the processes using those resources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:53:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:53:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432246] Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160753.m1G7rtiY009916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pic2aa - Pic2AA is tool for converting jpeg/png to AA (Ascii Art) images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432246 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-16 02:53 EST ------- Imported and built. Thanks again for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 07:58:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160758.m1G7wZQt020792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-16 02:58 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds-0.8-0.2.prealpha.fc8.src.rpm If I set release "0.1.pre-alpha%{?dist}" rpmbuild warns: error: line 3: Illegal char '-' in release: Release: 0.1.pre-alpha.fc8 so what should I do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:06:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160806.m1G86hEu012381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-16 03:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glpi-mass-ocs-import Short Description: GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import Owners: remi Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:06:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160806.m1G86t3v022595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160805.m1G85mPu022389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-16 03:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glpi-pdf Short Description: GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers Owners: remmi Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160807.m1G87hOF022679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-02-16 03:07 EST ------- Fix typo in Owner New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glpi-pdf Short Description: GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers Owners: remi Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:10:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433033] Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802160810.m1G8AHHN013071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433033 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-16 03:10 EST ------- - Correct install section Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/picpuz/picpuz-15-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 08:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 03:18:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433095] New: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433095 Summary: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/galaxy/galaxy.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/galaxy/galaxy-13-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Galaxy is a free Linux computer program which simulates the motion of stars under the influence of gravity. Create a field of random stars to begin with, then watch the stars move as they are accelerated by their mutual gravitational attractions. You can vary the number of stars and the strength of gravity. Watch how the attractive forces accelerate individual stars and send them careening in new directions. Watch how large groups of stars develop into interesting patterns over time, such as clusters and spiral arms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 11:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161113.m1GBDLX6020593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 ------- Additional Comments From mwielaard at redhat.com 2008-02-16 06:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Is there a reason we're going to be shipping two versions? >From the java-1.7.0-icedtea README: Java compatibility ------------------ IcedTea is derived from OpenJDK, Sun's open-source implementation of the Java SE platform. At this time the build from which IcedTea was constructed corresponds to an early build of JDK 7. When JDK 7 is complete it will implement the Java SE 7 Platform Specification. Work on that specification is underway, but far from final. Any APIs in the JDK 7 implementation, whether new or old, are therefore subject to minor adjustments, major revisions, or even outright removal between now and the time that the Java SE 7 Platform Specification is finalized. Please take these facts into account before depending upon IcedTea. java-1.6.0-icedtea will be the "stable" version that is as close as possible to standard 1.6 compatibility as possible. --- >From a compatibility point of view the 1.6.0 version should be shipped as default. The reason IcedTea started with 1.7.0 was because that was the code that was available. Getting it liberated completely and bootstrapping with the free gnu java toolchain was priority one. Now that that work is stabilizing and the new work done upstream on openjdk6, we can concentrate on this more standards compatible version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 11:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161140.m1GBeA9d015384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-16 06:40 EST ------- Ok, let's introduce color-filesystem Can I remove gawk just before import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 12:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161207.m1GC7tBn019797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 07:07 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295066) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295066&action=view) License check list for crystalspace (For non-legal issue, please see my previous comments) Note: Unless you specify license tag for subpackages, subpackages inherits license tag from main package. For example, currently -doc subpackage has "License: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and GPLv2". Legal issue: GPLv2: GPLv2/apps/import/maya2spr/binarytree.cpp -> maya2spr (in -utils) is GPLv2 GPLv2/scripts/max/exportcsp.mcr GPLv2/scripts/max/exportlights.mcr GPLv2/scripts/max/exportsprite.mcr GPLv2/scripts/max/fixmaterials.mcr GPLv2/scripts/max/sanitycheck.ms GPLv2/scripts/max/showMap.mcr -> all these files (in -utils) are GPLv2 GPLv2+: GPLv2+/apps/tests/ceguitest/ceguitest.cpp GPLv2+/apps/tests/ceguitest/ceguitest.h -> ceguitest (in -demos) is GPLv2+ GPLv2+/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/ -> libcrystalspace-1.2.so (in main) is GPLv2+ (not LGPLv2+) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1810 echo './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/cstool/memory_pen.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/cstool/csfxscr.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/scrshot.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/x11-keys.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/cursorconvert.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/softfontcache.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/fontcache.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/canvas/graph2d.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/imageloader/commonimagefile.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/imageloader/optionsparser.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/particlesys/partgen.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/render3d/txtmgr.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/render3d/normalizationcube.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/parserenderstep.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/basesteptype.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/renderstep/basesteploader.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/script/scriptcommon.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/shader/shaderprogram.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/convert.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/cyclicbuf.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/sndstream.o@' './out/linuxx86/debug/libs/csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.o@' | sed 's/@ /@/g' | tr '@' ' 1811 ' >> ./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so.resp 1812 1813 1814 g++ -Wl,--as-needed -shared -o ./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so -Wl, at ./out/linuxx86/debug/libs/libcrystalspace-1.2.so.resp -lm -ldl -lnsl -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols -Wl,-E -g3 -lpthread -lpthread -lz -lm -ldl -lnsl -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--warn-unresolved-symbols -Wl,-E -g3 \ 1815 -Wl,-soname,libcrystalspace-1.2.so ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPLv2+/plugins/sndsys/element/ -> sndsysXXX.so (in main) is GPLv2+ GPLv2+/plugins/utilities/movierecorder/ -> movierecorder.so (in main) is GPLv2+ (not GPLv2) GPLv2+/scripts/jamtemplate/createproject.sh -> createproject.sh (in -devel) is GPLv2+ Check for GPLv2+ pollution root: GPLv2+/include/csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.h -> LGPLv2+/include/csplugincommon.h:#include "csplugincommon/sndsys/snddata.h" -> LGPLv2+/include/crystalspace.h:#include "csplugincommon.h" -> File_C_or_C++/plugins/cscript/pycscegui/cs_cegui.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" File_C_or_C++/plugins/cscript/csperl5/cswigpl5.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/converter.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/genmeshify.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/processor.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/genmeshify/stdloadercontext.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/startme/startme.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tools/lighter2/common.h:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/basemapgen/basemapgen.h:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/heightmapgen/heightmapgen.h:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/tools/partconv/partconv.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" ( ----------------- LGPLv2+/apps/walktest/walktest.cpp:#include "crystalspace.h" LGPLv2+/apps/pysimp/pysimp.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tests/imptest/imptest.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tests/eventtest/eventtest.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tests/sndtest/sndtest.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/pathtut/pathtut.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simpcd/simpcd.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simple2/simple2.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/mazing/gamestuff.cpp:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/mazing/appmazing.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simplept/simplept.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/phystut/phystut.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simpmap/simpmap.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simpvs/simpvs.h:#include LGPLv2+/apps/tutorial/simple1/simple1.h:#include ------------- can be killed ) -> _pycscegui.so (in crystalspace-devel) is polluted -> Some files in -utils are also polluted GPLv2+/include/csplugincommon/sndsys/sndstream.h -> LGPLv2+/include/csplugincommon.h:#include "csplugincommon/sndsys/sndstream.h" (-> same above) GPLv2+/include/ivaria/movierecorder.h -> LGPLv2+/include/ivaria.h:#include "ivaria/movierecorder.h" -> (-> not pollute any more) Summary main : LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ -utils: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ and GPLv2 -demos: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ -devel: LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ -doc: ???? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 12:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433030] Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161232.m1GCWWKC023527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findwild - Wildcard file search https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433030 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-16 07:32 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 12:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432482] Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161258.m1GCwlhl004270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cryptokit - OCaml library of cryptographic and hash functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432482 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 13:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161318.m1GDIE6c031072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-16 08:18 EST ------- Upstream said that license is GPLv2. Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/greyhounds/greyhounds-0.8-0.3.prealpha.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 13:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:20:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245488] Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161320.m1GDKTCa008304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maradns - security-aware DNS server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245488 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2008-02-16 08:20 EST ------- Hello Brendon, Apart from the Source0 line, which should be http://www.maradns.org/download/1.3/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 instead of http://www.maradns.org/download/1.2/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 the package looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 13:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] New: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: Python wrapper (bindings) for tidylib, this allows you to tidy HTML files through a Pythonic interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 14:10:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:10:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161410.m1GEA883007327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-16 09:10 EST ------- Hi Jirka, I was thinking about using pkgconfig with sox-devel (and Requiring the related libs there.) For what i've seen in devel, it only uses pkg-config at library detection. Well, see the attached patch.(which i don't expect to use unless approved by the upstream project). There is maybe a better way to do this (i meant to use AM_LDFLAGS to avoid_version seems a little hacky). Also it would be good to provide a pkg-config detection for packages that need sox-devel (Work in progress, but it will depend on the used scheme, either with or without libltdl, which change a lot). As a third part packager; I would provide a sox-libs-freeworld for the libmad and others libs. Maybe that would need to define a more accurate %file section for {_libdir}/sox/*.so . For the amr part , as this is nonfree but also non-redistributable, I cannot hold any sox-libs-nonfree package and that would be cared at end-users rebuild of the freeworld package. for info i've made a nosrc package for amr{nv,wb}, you can see here: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 14:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161411.m1GEBIOs016699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-16 09:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295071) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295071&action=view) Patch to add modular sox built (need to be approved upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 14:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161430.m1GEUGC1019632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-16 09:30 EST ------- I have submitted the path here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1894926&group_id=10706&atid=310706 Also , found an interesting pkg-config patch here: https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=6ffb82fd0802130847ncd95990wa2203f220763b13e%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=sox-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 15:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161521.m1GFLtDJ028065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-16 10:21 EST ------- Ralf and Parag, thanks for your efforts. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/unicap-0.2.19-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 15:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161558.m1GFwVtl001094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ondrejj at salstar.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-16 10:58 EST ------- rpmlint output: python-turboflot.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.4-1 0.0.5-1.fc8 I think this package requires TurboGears and simplejson, so add: Requires: TurboGears >= 1.0.3, python-simplejson >= ... or something similar. Source package do not match upstream and source URL is not complete! May be there is a missing "." at end of description (just summary can't end with "."). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161601.m1GG1NGa025267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:02:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161602.m1GG2ljo025564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-16 11:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Usually section 3 man files are for the explanation of functions > and should be in -devel subpackage. I will review this and make the change before the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161602.m1GG26se002050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-16 11:02 EST ------- Package do not build in mock, add for example this: BuildRequires: python-setuptools >= 0.6c5 Error output: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 2, in from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.21399 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161603.m1GG3E1O025645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-16 11:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > - When installing desktop files, desktop-file-install must be called > ("desktop-file-install usage" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) I will review this and make the change before the next build. Thank you for looking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161604.m1GG4B9H025758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161632.m1GGWCn3006852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 11:32 EST ------- Well, for 0.6.6-2: * Please don't introduce Epoch. * Please don't use _unpackaged_files_terminate_build but explicitly remove files unneededly installed. Using _unpackaged_files_terminate_build frequently makes a package unusable when version is upgraded and some new files gets actually needed to be installed. * Remove all unneeded comments to make your spec file easier to read. * %{_libdir}/lib*.so should be in -devel subpackage (What I commented was about %{_libdir}/speech-dispatcher/lib*.so) * What I meant by "dependency between subpackage must be EVR specific" is that for example -devel package should have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}", not "Requires: %{name} = %{version}". * %dir %{_libdir}/speech-dispatcher-modules is listed twice * -doc subpackage must have Requires(post): /sbin/install-info or so And if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : fi or so must be %preun, not %postun (please check the section "Texinfo" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) * %configure \ --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_prefix} - I guess you must not do this. This will sometimes override header files, configuration files etc and leads to some undesirable results. * And I am waiting for your submit of dotconf review request :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161639.m1GGdFHV007862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 11:39 EST ------- Well, then would you try ---------------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install --vendor="" \ --dir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ applications/%{name}.desktop ---------------------------------------------------------------- as suggested by Ariszlo (sorry on my browser I cannot see the last character of your name), Martin? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 16:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433129] New: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433129 Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adam at spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This package was orphaned, and I am now taking it. As stated in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#head-3f36f420c1e97b0faecad2f2c5f6871433348a3a I must open a review. The package is already in cvs, under gkrellm-weather. I don't think there are any problems with the package as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 17:17:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161717.m1GHHihC014337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 12:17 EST ------- Well, first of all, the version of bundled autoopts seems 31.0.6. Is it possible to submit a seperated autoopts review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 17:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430366] Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161758.m1GHw16F011287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430366 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 12:58 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 17:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161758.m1GHwn39011420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 12:58 EST ------- Would someone update this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161810.m1GIAs2T014015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-16 13:10 EST ------- Version: 1.2.4.orig Non numeric version string like alpha, beta, rc, cannot be simply putted into the Version tag, you should use the Release field for this. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6dd9d2288206ac9bd8f1bf9b791b22a W: setup-not-quiet Setup is not quiet, you should use %setup -q. The source tag documents where to find the upstream sources for the rpm, in most cases this should be a complete URL to the upstream tarball. May be this: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/blueproximity/blueproximity-1.2.4.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161825.m1GIPpMJ025349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-16 13:25 EST ------- Back in the days of FC-5 and FC-6 Fedora's libopts (or autoopts) package was retired: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/libopts/ Strangely the latest libopts tarball from upstream is versioned 27.6: http://gnu.glug-nith.org/libopts/rel27.6/ At the same time, Debian ships a libopts package that bears the same EVRA as autogen: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopts25 I took this option. Remember due to the multiple licensing scenario we have to separate the libopts (or autoopts) portion from the rest of autogen. What do you suggest? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] New: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anyremote at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.5-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.6-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn Description: The overall goal of this project is to provide remote control service on Linux through Bluetooth, InfraRed, Wi-Fi or TCP/IP connection. anyRemote supports wide range of modern cell phones like Nokia, SonyEricsson, Motorola and others. anyRemote was developed as thin "communication" layer between Buetooth (IR, Wi-Fi)-capabled phone and Linux, and in could be configured to manage almost any software. gAnyRemote and kAnyRemote are GTK and KDE GUI frontends for anyRemote. This is my first package and i need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161832.m1GIWqIS026410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 anyremote at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:47:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:47:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161847.m1GIlm7I028923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-16 13:47 EST ------- There was also a autogen-manuals package according to the Spec in CVS. According to the %changelog, which is quite old, it was created to prevent some sort of conflict on F-7. The reason for this conflict is unclear to me. Therefore, I dropped it. It looks to me that the *.autogen suffix is not required because no other package seems to provide binaries of the same name. If that is so, we can drop the dependency on %{_sbindir}/alternatives. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 18:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161848.m1GImK2t019876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net) | ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-16 13:48 EST ------- Well, I've tried to not rename gnome-menu-extended.desktop. Whereas the desktop is installed in the right path, he doesn't appear in the menu nor in Alacarte without any reason. I've update the previous files, so you can use the links which I've give previously. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 19:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161901.m1GJ1JGp031455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 Bug 214967 depends on bug 349801, which changed state. Bug 349801 Summary: mock installs packages that don't satisfy BuildRequires: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349801 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 19:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802161959.m1GJxNV1030974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-16 14:59 EST ------- Yes, go ahead. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] New: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/mldonkey.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/mldonkey-2.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MLDonkey - the Open Source eDonkey client Features: * 100% OpenSource, GPL license * runs on Linux, Unix, Solaris, MacOSX, MorphOS and Windows * Core and Guis are separated or linked. * written in ObjectiveCaml, with some C and even some Assembler parts. * OtherNetworksSupported, using separate executables * built to run as daemon for days, weeks, ever... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162108.m1GL8E1i010209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mldonkey - |Review Request: mldonkey - |MLDonkey is a multi-platform|MLDonkey is a multi-platform |multi-network peer-to-peer |multi-network peer-to-peer |client |client (ocaml) ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-16 16:08 EST ------- Added magic word ocaml to the summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:15:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162115.m1GLFmVn020604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-16 16:15 EST ------- I should add that there are problems with the %doc section revealed by rpmlint which I'm going to sort out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162135.m1GLZ4jI014848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-16 16:35 EST ------- Hi, this is an informal review, I can't approve your package or sponsor you. [-] Don't use %define for name and version [-] Summary should'n end with a dot [-] Group Applications/Telephony doesn't exist, use one of the groups in cat /usr/share/doc/rpm*/GROUPS [-] Source tag should contain a link to the original tarball: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3.tar.gz [-] Recommended Buildroot is %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [-] Don't require coreutils, binutils, bash, gawk, bc, uucp, bluez-utils, bluez-libs, libXtst. RPM will find them itself. [-] Add libdir to configure script: ./configure --libdir=%{_libdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162139.m1GLdWSl024209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-16 16:39 EST ------- Change made. Tagged, built for devel and F-8, and pushed to F-8. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162138.m1GLcqXA015252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 16:38 EST ------- fldigi-2.09-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421241] Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162145.m1GLjlg9016559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-ZendFramework - Leading open-source PHP framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421241 ------- Additional Comments From giallu at gmail.com 2008-02-16 16:45 EST ------- Well, if you want to defer this it is ok. However, please note you just need one spec and one review. I was only suggesting that the single spec file would build a number of binary RPMS instead of a single one. This is done in several other packages and (more or less) detailed in http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch10s04.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162148.m1GLmxgk025708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 16:48 EST ------- arpack-2.1-7.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 21:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162148.m1GLmtU5016826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 16:48 EST ------- arpack-2.1-7.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 22:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162220.m1GMK0iK030679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-16 17:19 EST ------- I figured this wouldn't build because of the ocaml update, but it turns out that it builds fine. rpmlint has only the two weird complaints above; someone who understands what ocaml is doing really needs to get with the rpmlint maintainer and figure out the source of these complaints. Maybe it just doesn't like the fact that the only thing directly in _libdir is a directory. There's a test suite there; I tried running it but it seems to need the package to be installed before it works, and I don't know if it's possible to adjust the various search paths to pick up the files from the build directory. There are several grammatical errors in the description which should be easy to fix up. I had hoped to find a better upstream URL than one pointing to a list of files for download, but the wiki that upstream has doesn't seem to have any actual content. As far as I can tell, the License is LGPLv2+ plus some type of exception, so I guess this is "LGPLv2+ with exceptions". In addition, the COPYING file needs to be added to the package. You should probably add AUTHOR, CHANGELOG and TODO as well. I'm not sure about the stuff in the "website" directory. I can't think of any better way to handle the broken build system of this package, and you've adequately commented things, so that's OK. The README file is duplicated between packages, but we already decided I wouldn't block on this. * source files match upstream: 4b3929f758dac11bebdcbb84963ab44e2a5ebf06023665dd511d61b19e9654b8 ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * Follows ocaml packaging guidelines * summary is OK. X description could use some grammar fixes. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text should be included in the package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint seems to have only bogus complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml(CygwinPath) = 55504b4f452dc9b72bcd7564a4c5a991 ocaml(CygwinPath_lexer) = 29edb3b5196b78e256fdcbafa566486b ocaml(CygwinPath_parser) = d7c4325a803605bd4737615702dcb060 ocaml(FilePath) = 80389f0c61bde05b590de9a464aa1831 ocaml(FilePath_type) = b20c6b0e73bf51cf8d25a2f256443dfc ocaml(FileUtil) = bd8589f4d97317061dd24d80db6eeacc ocaml(GenericPath_lexer) = d564536f943cee33d33f51880f85406d ocaml(GenericPath_parser) = 177c3bf79cd035b170e1d2efce3a36ff ocaml(MacOSPath) = 6eecbacbd1f32d7cbddb7f1e269358b7 ocaml(MacOSPath_lexer) = 473b7b6c310c611393a88e6922dfc897 ocaml(MacOSPath_parser) = 323e664f9989fd08de7097f80bc34995 ocaml(Str) = 56bb7ee61b2da83d42394686e3558fe4 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(UnixLabels) = daaededf8793acd8b374c4e7c5d1fd16 ocaml(UnixPath) = 1538fbea534e0ac1e7f3a48c81330a6c ocaml(UnixPath_lexer) = 52138249abfd7fd19243bae955fec96a ocaml(UnixPath_parser) = 34b22f7becddd052a253243d516b2685 ocaml(Win32Path) = ef3947425c94dcbbbb4e80a851401ab0 ocaml(Win32Path_lexer) = 934bf4ebb71efb7a397e9fd8ce16a1b2 ocaml(Win32Path_parser) = b55b3f0165af59f53b11c55fa4f2495d ocaml-fileutils = 0.3.0-2.fc9 = ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Lexing) = b1793496643444d3762dd42bebe2cfe3 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Map) = dedde7683d54ae7db1eb97cc868dd047 ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Parsing) = 62cca107e4e88af303516459a87c3e9a ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 ocaml-fileutils-devel-0.3.0-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml-fileutils-devel = 0.3.0-2.fc9 = ocaml-fileutils = 0.3.0-2.fc9 * %check is not present; upstream test suite cannot easily be run. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. ? README file is duplicated. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 22:32:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:32:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162232.m1GMW7uF023800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 22:36:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431215] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162236.m1GMa8qW000961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431215 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-16 17:36 EST ------- Any update here? I gave review feedback on three of your tickets only a couple of hours after you submitted them; one was approved and two did not build, and yet there's been no response from you on any of them. Why submit a package and then ignore the almost immediate feedback you received? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 23:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162306.m1GN6pxb029540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-16 18:06 EST ------- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I believe the license is LGPLv2+, not GPLv2+ as you have. There's no reason to have a build dependency on glibc-common; it's installed by default. I guess it doesn't hurt anything to have it there, though. For the -devel description, it helps to say something about the package including headers needed to compile programs using nettle. I see you deleted the static library, but I wonder if that actually leaves any point to this package. After all, what use are the headers if there's nothing to link against? If all you have left are the three executables then I don't think you can properly call this a library. There's a test suite in the package which is easy to run, so this needs to be done. Just put "make check" in a %check section. All of the documentation is duplicated between the main and -devel packages. You need to decide which files are useful for development and which (like the license) are needed in the main package. But there's no point in installing everything twice. * source files match upstream: d6e540bf4acc857a3b09580e7f61822d352ee83c119579bf7333f0a785f7d9ac nettle-1.15.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (glibc-common is redundant) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: nettle-1.15-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm nettle = 1.15-1.fc9 = /bin/sh /sbin/install-info libgmp.so.3()(64bit) nettle-devel-1.15-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm nettle-devel = 1.15-1.fc9 = nettle = 1.15-1.fc9 X %check is not present, but a test suite is present. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X Many duplicated files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (install-info) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 16 23:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802162344.m1GNiDAI011723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-16 18:44 EST ------- Thank you Steve, Mamoru, Jeroen and Kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 00:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170038.m1H0cqbb012007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 19:38 EST ------- unixcw-2.3-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 00:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170042.m1H0g8BJ021407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 19:42 EST ------- unixcw-2.3-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 00:47:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170047.m1H0lqGR022311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-16 19:47 EST ------- libax25-0.0.11-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 01:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:27:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] New: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/ax25-apps.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package provides specific user applications for hamradio that use AX.25 Net/ROM or ROSE network protocols: * axcall: a general purpose AX.25, NET/ROM and ROSE connection program. * axlisten: a network monitor of all AX.25 traffic heard by the system. * ax25ipd: an RFC1226 compliant daemon which provides encapsulation of AX.25 traffic over IP. * ax25mond: retransmits data received from sockets into an AX.25 monitor socket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 01:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] New: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/ax25-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: ax25-tools is a collection of tools that are used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer. They will configure interfaces and assign callsigns to ports as well as Net/ROM and ROSE configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 01:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] New: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/cwdaemon.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/cwdaemon-0.9.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Cwdaemon is a small daemon which uses the pc parallel or serial port and a simple transistor switch to output morse code to a transmitter from a text message sent to it via the udp internet protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 01:38:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170138.m1H1c0lM029909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 20:37 EST ------- Rebuild failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 03:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170305.m1H35gDR011401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-16 22:05 EST ------- The package from comment #4 looks all good to me... This package is APPROVED. Just out of curiosity, is upstream planning further development? The upstream source seems to have last been updated in 2003. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 03:41:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170341.m1H3fWl1007789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-16 22:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar.spec SRPM URL: http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar-0.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm fixed. - added missing BR perl(XML::Parser), desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 03:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] New: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/aldo.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/aldo-0.7.5-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Aldo is a morse code learning tool released under GPL, which provides four type of training methods: 1. Classic exercise : Identify random characters played in morse code. 2. Koch method : Two morse characters will be played at full speed (20wpm) until you'll be able to identify at least 90 percent of them. After that, one more character will be added, and so on. 3. Read from file : Identify the morse code generated from a file. 4. Callsign exercise : Identify random callsigns played in morse code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 04:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170420.m1H4KtWN023071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-16 23:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 04:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170423.m1H4NKmu014254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-16 23:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 04:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170433.m1H4XcKw024797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-16 23:33 EST ------- Ah... as libcrystalspace-1.2.so is polluted by GPLv2+, the tag "LGPLv2+" seems almost nonsense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 04:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] New: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/colrdx.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/colrdx-1.02-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Colrdx is a simple client for amateur radio dx-clusters. In a split-screen display you can type commands for the cluster in the bottom part. Messages from the dx-cluster will appear in the main window. There is also a status line at the top with some basic information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 06:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] New: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gpsk31.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gpsk31-0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Hamradio PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 06:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] New: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 Summary: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze-0.2.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Squeeze is a modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment. Its design adheres to the Xfce philosophy, which basically means Squeeze is designed to be both fast and easy to use. rpmlint says: squeeze.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/squeeze-0.2.2/TODO Which I will fix with iconv at reviewer request, but I think is too minor to bother with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170724.m1H7Oii2018876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 02:24 EST ------- glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170724.m1H7OHLb009489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jpmahowald at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2008-02-17 02:24 EST ------- + Builds on development i386 + rpmlint clean + License GPLv2+ + Source matches + Summary and description + Proper macros + Proper file ownership Quite straightforward. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170729.m1H7TChX019708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170728.m1H7SP5i010357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 02:28 EST ------- glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170737.m1H7b8wY011799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-17 02:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aldo Short Description: Ham radio morse code tutor Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170734.m1H7YVk6011156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-17 02:34 EST ------- Thanks John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:34:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] New: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm-0.3.5.23-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: PCMan File Manager is an extremly fast and lightweight file manager which features tabbed browsing and user-friendly interface. koji scratch build results: for dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432895 for dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=432894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170744.m1H7iqjT012691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk Summary|Review Request: python-tidy |Review Request: python-tidy |- Python wrapper for tidy, |- Python wrapper for tidy, |from the HTML tidy project |from the HTML tidy project ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-17 02:44 EST ------- BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags. BLOCKER: Package does not match package-naming-guidelines. Your package is named python-tidy and upstream package uTidylib. I see, that you are using just one part from this source, but I don't know, if we can mix that this way. BLOCKER: python-tidy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libtidy Add version info for libtidy requirement. Other comments: I think a better group for this package is Development/Languages . Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3 This code is not required: %{python_sitelib}/tidy %if 0%{?fedora} >= 9 %{python_sitelib}/%{oname}-%{version}-py%{pyver}.egg-info You can use %{python_sitelib}/* As I don't know, what to do with this license mix, I can't approve you package now. If you can give me a link to more information. You can ask author to remove path.py from this package and rename it's package as you need. Otherwise you need to fix these problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:52:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170752.m1H7qRIg014029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-17 02:52 EST ------- Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-2/nettle.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/nettle/1.15-2/nettle-1.15-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170751.m1H7p5eb023195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 02:51 EST ------- glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170754.m1H7sXxD023424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 fedora at famillecollet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 07:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170753.m1H7rVKl014119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 02:53 EST ------- glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] New: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xjakub at fi.muni.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is my first package and I'm seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client-5.10.40-4.20080206svn.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) is a software platform for distributed computing: several initiatives of various scientific disciplines all compete for the idle time of desktop computers. BOINC will be part of the Fedora Astronomy spin. (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy) The BOINC core client program is required to participate in any project that uses BOINC. A central server distributes work units and collects results via this client. When attaching a local machine to a project, it will also dynamically download the project's application program to be then wrapped by the BOINC core client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170935.m1H9ZJPX005393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 xjakub at fi.muni.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:47:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431216] Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170947.m1H9lPC6030643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431216 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-17 04:47 EST ------- see #431215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:48:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431217] Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170948.m1H9mliD007435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-FileDialog - File dialog for Perl Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431217 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-17 04:48 EST ------- see #413215, but in the final state of webinject package development this was not required anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431215] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170946.m1H9k5LI007182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - capture and show stderr output for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431215 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-17 04:46 EST ------- I am sorry for the delay, but all 3 packages were a prerequisite for a package (webinject - web application monitor) I was working on for my now former employer. I really appreciate your reviews, but the life has changed and I must close the requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 09:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802170953.m1H9rU3S008326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-17 04:53 EST ------- The release number must be updated : don't use 1.2.4.orig The http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4.orig-1.fc8.src was a 404 Please fix more bugs before request a new update : only 3 bugs were fixed (4 if the image name on the .desktop was fixed) For the local stuff look : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 10:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171000.m1HA0Ip2000543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 05:00 EST ------- Since bug 430978 is taking forever, I added libsoup-2.4 patch for evoltion-rss. I can now build it under rawhide. Another thing is I've dropped firefox-devel (or xulrunner-devel) until xulrunner is fixed. The new files are: SPEC: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss.spec SRPM: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss-0.0.7-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 10:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171029.m1HATnqw014661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-17 05:29 EST ------- Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 10:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171029.m1HATQqR005546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-17 05:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: greyhounds Short Description: Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game Owners: kurzawa Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 10:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171030.m1HAUFlQ015069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-17 05:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: color-filesystem Short Description: Color filesystem layout Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 10:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171031.m1HAVf6V015325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-17 05:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license > for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags. Fixed. > BLOCKER: Package does not match package-naming-guidelines. Your package is named > python-tidy and upstream package uTidylib. I see, that you are using just one > part from this source, but I don't know, if we can mix that this way. The name is correct (as I read this, make most sense too: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d > BLOCKER: python-tidy.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libtidy > Add version info for libtidy requirement. Fixed. > Other comments: > I think a better group for this package is Development/Languages . php-tidy is using that, ok. > Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3 fixed > This code is not required: > %{python_sitelib}/tidy > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 9 > %{python_sitelib}/%{oname}-%{version}-py%{pyver}.egg-info > > You can use %{python_sitelib}/* Both are valid, %if is safer when things changes, but ... > As I don't know, what to do with this license mix, I can't approve you package > now. If you can give me a link to more information. > > You can ask author to remove path.py from this package and rename it's package > as you need. Otherwise you need to fix these problems. See the fix, it's normal to have several licenses on a package. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy-0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 11:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171109.m1HB9CSi011977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ondrejj at salstar.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-17 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license > > for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags. > > Fixed. Not fixed. Where do you see "BSD" in licenses? There is just one LICENSE file which contain MIT license. > The name is correct (as I read this, make most sense too: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d OK, accepting this. > > Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3 > > fixed If you are using Requires: python >=2.5, set same version for python-devel > See the fix, it's normal to have several licenses on a package. On IRC guys told me, that public domain do not need to be mentioned here. Just fix the "BSD" to "MIT". You can mention other licenses in comments of .spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 11:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171123.m1HBNSaj023284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-02-17 06:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Without the netcgi1 patch I can't get cduce to compile: > > Checking for package camlp4... ok > Checking for package num... ok > Checking for package pcre... ok > Checking for package ulex... ok > Checking for package cgi... ocamlfind: Package `cgi' not found > failed ! Ok, we fixed it in the svn version. Now if cgi package is not found then cduce is build but dtd2cduce and and the web interface interpreter are not. Thanks for the bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 11:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 06:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171131.m1HBVao0024599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-02-17 06:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Spec URL: http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce.spec > In cduce.spec the following lines mv AUTHORS AUTHORS.old iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 < AUTHORS.old > AUTHORS are no longer useful since now the AUTHORS file is in UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 12:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:18:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171218.m1HCI20F031961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 07:18 EST ------- Jindrich, would you check the comment 12 by Hans? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 12:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171234.m1HCYOSu001986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-17 07:34 EST ------- > Not fixed. Where do you see "BSD" in licenses? There is just one LICENSE file > which contain MIT license. Better now? > If you are using Requires: python >=2.5, set same version for python-devel Ok. > On IRC guys told me, that public domain do not need to be mentioned here. > Just fix the "BSD" to "MIT". You can mention other licenses in comments of .spec file. Here we go: spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/python-tidy/python-tidy-0.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 12:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427824] Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171251.m1HCpCtP027938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427824 ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2008-02-17 07:51 EST ------- Upstream released the first stable version of 0.7. New Spec: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko.spec New SRPM: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko-0.7-0.3.fc8.src.rpm There should only be minor changes compared to the previous RCs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 13:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171354.m1HDsRHC014675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 14:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171408.m1HE8oQs017549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 09:08 EST ------- For 0.2.1-3: * Scriptlets - Scriptlets for GConf are not right. (also scriptlets for %pre is needed). Please check the subsection "GConf" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - Also the scriptlets for GTK icon cache are not right. Please check the same wiki page. * Timestamp - To keep timestamps on installed files, I recommend to use --------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. * Desktop file - Why is the category 'Utility' listed twice? * Documents - Usually the file "INSTALL" is for people who want to build and install softwares by themselves and is not needed for people using rpm system. - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. * macros - Please use macros correctly. For example /usr/bin must be %{_bindir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 14:39:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171439.m1HEd5DA012435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-17 09:39 EST ------- Much better. :-) APPROVED. Do not require EL-* builds, because there are no python-2.5 for this OS. Please, be careful when setting license fields in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171506.m1HF6SOU017295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-17 10:06 EST ------- > Much better. :-) > > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tidy Short Description: Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:24:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171524.m1HFORo2029472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433199 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:24:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171524.m1HFOQti029447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-17 10:24 EST ------- Due to the absense of autogen in PPC64 this package can not be scratch built in Koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] New: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta-2.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Anjuta DevStudio is a versatile Integrated Development Environment (IDE) on GNOME Desktop Environment and features a number of advanced programming facilities. These include project management, application and class wizards, an on-board interactive debugger, powerful source editor, syntax highlighting, intellisense autocompletions, symbol navigation, version controls, integrated GUI designing and other tools. The documentation for this package is in anjuta-doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:27:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171527.m1HFRnNA020431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-17 10:27 EST ------- Anjuta installs some template *.c and *.h which causes some rpmlint warnings: $ rpmlint anjuta anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gtk/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/anjuta-plugin/src/plugin.h anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/anjuta-plugin/src/plugin.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/xlib-dock/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/xlib/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gtk/src/callbacks.h anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gtk/src/callbacks.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/terminal/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gnome/src/callbacks.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gnome/src/callbacks.h anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/xlib-dock/src/wmgeneral.h anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/xlib-dock/src/wmgeneral.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/gnome/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/mkfile/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/sdl/src/main.c anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/project/xlib-dock/src/pixmaps.h anjuta.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/anjuta/indent_test.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171524.m1HFOvDo029565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-17 10:24 EST ------- I've tried building ballz with guichan-0.7.1, and it turns out that all that is needed is a simple rebuild. I though that you had already tried that? Anyways that means that a compat package for guichan-0.6 isn't (really) needed and if you do one for binary compatibility reasons, you should remove all the files which normally go to -devel after make install, and then indeed cal;l it compat-foo, without a -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:48:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225639] Merge Review: cdrdao In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171548.m1HFm088023573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: cdrdao https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225639 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-17 10:48 EST ------- Harald, ping ? I've checked in GCC 4.3 fixes upstream, or you can use the patch from gcdmaster F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430978] Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171556.m1HFuQRS002139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsoup22 - Backward compatibility package for libsoup 2.2 API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430978 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|430070 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 15:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171556.m1HFuP6G002102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|430978 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 10:56 EST ------- * License issue ---------------------------------------------------- src/evolution-import-rss.c GPLv2 (strict) -> %_bindir/evolution-import-rss is GPLv2 The other parts are GPLv2+ ---------------------------------------------------- Conclusion: - Following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines You should write as following in spec file: ---------------------------------------------------- .............. Group: Applications/Internet License: GPLv2 and GPLv2+ .............. %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) # Only the following binaries is under GPLv2. Other # parts are under GPLv2+. %{_bindir}/evolution-import-rss %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/evolution-rss.schemas .............. ---------------------------------------------------- For 0.0.7-6: * configure option - The following options are not needed for %configure. ---------------------------------------------------------------- --prefix="%{_prefix}" --sysconfdir="%{_sysconfdir}" --libdir=%{_libdir} ---------------------------------------------------------------- You can check what %configure actually does by $ rpm --eval %configure . * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, I recommend to use ---------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR="%{buildroot}" INSTALL="install -p" ---------------------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. * ldconfig - Calling /sbin/ldconfig is not needed for %preun. * rpmlint - You can use rpmlint (in rpmlint package) to detect some generic mistakes in your rpms. Currently: ---------------------------------------------------------------- evolution-rss.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/evolution-rss.schemas evolution-rss.i386: W: no-version-in-last-changelog ---------------------------------------------------------------- - The first one can be ignored. - For second one: * Please also write the EVR in %changelog (please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs ) * Also, I recommend to insert one blank line between each changelog entry like: ---------------------------------------------------------------- %changelog * Sat Feb 16 2008 Lucian Langa - 0.0.7-6 - Drop gecko requirements till xulrunner is fixed * Tue Feb 12 2008 Lucian Langa - 0.0.7-5 - buildroot fixes ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is useful when using Fedora CVS system. * Some misc cleanup - For consistency, as you write ---------------------------------------------------------------- %pre if [ "$1" -gt 1 ]; then export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule \ %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas >/dev/null || : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ fi ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please use %{name} in %files entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:11:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:11:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171611.m1HGBXOq027739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|432542 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171611.m1HGBW7K027711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|433199 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 11:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Strangely the latest libopts tarball from upstream is versioned 27.6: > http://gnu.glug-nith.org/libopts/rel27.6/ > > At the same time, Debian ships a libopts package that bears the same EVRA as > autogen: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libopts25 I took this option. > Remember due to the multiple licensing scenario we have to separate the libopts > (or autoopts) portion from the rest of autogen. > > What do you suggest? This is *only my opinion* I think that if you want to name the libopts related subrpm as "libopts" the version should be 31.0.6 (as autoopts-config --version surely returns this value) texlive maintainers use this method (i.e. they allow different versions for subpackage), however I really don't want this. _IMO_ it is better that libopts related packages are named to show explicitly that they are subpackages of autogen, i.e. they should be autogen-libopts-devel, for example (as we actually did so in tetex age) with the same EVR as autogen main package. (In reply to comment #7) > It looks to me that the *.autogen suffix is not required because no other > package seems to provide binaries of the same name. If that is so, we can drop > the dependency on %{_sbindir}/alternatives. If you don't know why alternatives is used here (note that I don't know either) it should just be dropped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171611.m1HGBlEi004966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |432542 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171611.m1HGBkKi004937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433199 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171616.m1HGGFTY028583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-17 11:16 EST ------- Thomas: I'm interested in EL-5 branch. Would you maintain it yourself or you won't mind if I maintained it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:19:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:19:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171619.m1HGJghZ005904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-17 11:19 EST ------- Paul: I'm interested in EL-5 branch. Would you maintain it yourself or you won't mind if I maintained it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171615.m1HGFntt005522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-17 11:15 EST ------- Thomas: I'm interested in EL-5 branch. Would you maintain it yourself or you won't mind if I maintained it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:16:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:16:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171616.m1HGGRvV005694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-17 11:16 EST ------- Thomas: I'm interested in EL-5 branch. Would you maintain it yourself or you won't mind if I maintained it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171643.m1HGhnOO009529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 11:43 EST ------- What I mean by "ping?" is that I want you to update your spec file/srpm followed by comment 2. If you update your spec/srpm, sponsor members (including Jason and me) may want to review your spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:46:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171646.m1HGk1pW000596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 11:46 EST ------- > * License issue fixed > * configure option fixed > * Timestamps fixed > * ldconfig fixed > * rpmlint fixed > * Some misc cleanup fixed updated spec and srpm to reflect changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171653.m1HGroID001642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > updated spec and srpm to reflect changes. To where? (please change the release number every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171655.m1HGtQ9E002158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-17 11:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > For 1.2-3: > > * As I wrote some missing dependency for -devel subpackage as "Example", > it seems that there are some more missing dependencies for -devel package > - cegui-devel > - zlib-devel > (I guess adding more 2 BR listed above should be enough) > Sorry, I missunderstood. I did a full check and couldn't find any other headers besides the 2 above which I've added > * It seems that adding INSTALL="install -p" to make install actually works > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=426911 > Strange as the makefile is justb a skeleton calling jam, but if it works thats good! Added. > ! This weekend I will try to check license issues (if any) for this > package (more than 10000 files needs checking) Okay, about your analysis, I agree, except that the movierecorder plugin really is GPLv2 and not GPLv2+, as it includes (and uses) the nuppelvideo.h file which says: /* This file is from the NuppelVideo project: * * (c) Roman Hochleitner roman at mars.tuwien.ac.at * NuppelVideo is distributed under the GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE version 2 */ This makes the list: main : GPLv2+ and GPLv2 -utils: GPLv2+ and GPLv2 -demos: GPLv2+ -devel: GPLv2+ -doc: ???? So to make things easier, esp the ????, I've just added a License tag of: "GPLv2+ and GPLv2" to the main package, and let all the subpackages inherent this. I've added a large comment above the main License tag explaining why it is what it is. Also I will contact upstream about this, as I believe they intend the core of crystalspace to be LGPL not GPL. Here is a new (hopefully the last) version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/crystalspace-1.2-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 16:55:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:55:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171655.m1HGtRYl011521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-02-17 11:55 EST ------- All of the above have been corrected: (Suggestions by both Beno?t and Guidolin) New links are: SRPM url: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC url: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:07:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:07:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171707.m1HH7oLo004237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 12:07 EST ------- Thanks I will check this after rebuilding this on koji again. By the way I will appreciate it if you would review my review request bug 433182 (IMO very simple) (In reply to comment #12) > Also I will contact upstream about this, as I believe they intend > the core of crystalspace to be LGPL not GPL. I guess so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171710.m1HHAiJ0004928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 12:10 EST ------- SPEC: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss.spec SRPM: http://gnome.eu.org/evolution-rss-0.0.7-7.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171728.m1HHSJX4007660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-17 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171734.m1HHYDXP018463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-17 12:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432817] Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171729.m1HHTsdk017484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: greyhounds - Greyhounds is a greyhounds racing and breeding game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432817 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-17 12:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171731.m1HHVtkK018190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-17 12:31 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171732.m1HHW1wi018228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-17 12:32 EST ------- This fails to build for me in rawhide. The build log is about 3000 lines long and there's a bunch of stuff there that looks like error output, such as this: Generating docs for file /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydr/builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `8' /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `1' /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `H' /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `i' /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `o' /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/source/hydro_vs_rates.h:66: Error: Unexpected character `n' but at the end I think what kills the build is: Error: dot: can't open lines__service_8h_2a4d8a850b7f0515271aa4e92c71bd9f_cgraph.dot Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', arguments='"lines__service_8h_2a4d8a850b7f0515271aa4e92c71bd9f_cgraph.dot" -Tpng -o "lines__service_8h_2a4d8a850b7f0515271aa4e92c71bd9f_cgraph.png"' Error: dot: can't open lines__service_8h_07a0a39c77d5a3b6cd9758bd0dd51378_cgraph.dot Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', arguments='"lines__service_8h_07a0a39c77d5a3b6cd9758bd0dd51378_cgraph.dot" -Tpng -o "lines__service_8h_07a0a39c77d5a3b6cd9758bd0dd51378_cgraph.png"' Error: dot: can't open lines__service_8h_aa6a111a511c4f07dc11b62233ae2177_cgraph.dot Problems running dot: exit code=1, command='dot', arguments='"lines__service_8h_aa6a111a511c4f07dc11b62233ae2177_cgraph.dot" -Tpng -o "lines__service_8h_aa6a111a511c4f07dc11b62233ae2177_cgraph.png"' Could not open file /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/doxygen/html/magnetic_8cpp.html for writing s_service.h... I thought it might have something to with too much parallelism on my eight-CPU builder, but I turned off parallel make and the error is unchanged. (The random-looking portions of the strings do not change.) The /builddir/build/BUILD/c07.02.01/doxygen/html directory does exist in the chroot, and I have no problems creating a file with that name, so I'm at a bit of a loss. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:36:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171736.m1HHaU12009387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2008-02-17 12:36 EST ------- http://hg.lewk.org/TurboFlot/raw-file/836ad97edcc8/python-turboflot.spec http://pypi.python.org/packages/2.5/T/TurboFlot/python-turboflot-0.0.5-2.fc8.src.rpm * Sat Feb 16 2008 Luke Macken - 0.0.5-2 - Add TurboGears to BuildRequires and Requires - Require python-simplejson - Fix description - Fix Source0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171750.m1HHowY5011864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 12:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > # Only the following binaries is under GPLv2. Other Actually the following binary" is under GPLv2, sorry... Well, - This package itself is okay - As written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored A person who wants to get sponsord is requested to either submit another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request. For you it seems that your another review request (bug 431683) will be approved with a little more fixes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (evolution-rss) is APPROVED by me --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:51:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431683] Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171751.m1HHpkFe021620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rspam - Report as Spam Evolution Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431683 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 12:51 EST ------- Removing NEEDSPONSOR (bug 430070) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 17:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171756.m1HHu7Fe012787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-17 12:56 EST ------- In the .desktop the field Icon should be "Icon=blueproximity_base" In %file section please use : %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name} Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/blueproximity/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Is more easier to use wen the package will be update pygtk2-libglade require pygtk2 which require pygobject2 so keep over pygobject2 and pygtk2 Please fix all rpmlint error and fixable warning : - E: description-line-too-long blueproximity.src: E: invalid-spec-name blueproximity-1.spec blueproximity.src:69: W: macro-in-%changelog setup blueproximity.src:73: W: macro-in-%changelog version blueproximity.src:76: W: macro-in-%changelog name (to fix that use %%setup, %%{name} ... into the changelog) blueproximity.src: W: no-%build-section (add an empty %build section) blueproximity.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 5) And please update the date into the changelog (unless you can curve time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171800.m1HI0kRX013697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 13:00 EST ------- First of all, please submit submit one review request for one package. i.e. for {k,g}anyremote, please submit other review requests and set bug dependency properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171805.m1HI5UMm024376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 13:05 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171815.m1HIFnd1016651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 13:15 EST ------- Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171826.m1HIQMRw018359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-02-17 13:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-zope-interface New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171827.m1HIRt9C028049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-02-17 13:27 EST ------- Lubomir: I'm OK to maintain this myself but I'll happily add you as co-maintainer for both Fedora and EPEL if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:39:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171839.m1HIdbME029770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-17 13:39 EST ------- Source URL still do not match upstream! - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. - It is nicer to use %{version} in Source URL. It is not required, so you can leave it as is is you wish. If you fix source, I can approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171839.m1HIdqY7020174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control (+GUI for it) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-17 13:39 EST ------- OK. Corrected *spec and *src.rpm are here: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdnSRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn 2 Guidolin Francesco: I agree with comments (and already corrected tham) except: > Don't use %define for name and version Are You serious ? Using of %{name} is clearly specified at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > Add libdir to configure script: i do not think it is necessary, since i've run configure with --prefix=... and this is implies --libdir=... > Don't require coreutils, binutils, bash, gawk, bc, uucp In general this is true. But not in this case, because RPM will _not_ find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171841.m1HIffMY030415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 anyremote at mail.ru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: anyRemote - |Review Request: anyRemote - |Bluetooth remote control |Bluetooth remote control |(+GUI for it) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:45:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:45:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171845.m1HIjh39021456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 13:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: evolution-rss Short Description: This is an evolution plugin which enables evolution to read rss feeds. Owners: lucilaga Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: lucilanga Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171848.m1HImdYs031401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-17 13:48 EST ------- Built and pushed for rawhide, f7 and f8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433220] New: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anyremote at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.5-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn Description: kAnyRemote package is KDE GUI frontend for anyRemote (http://anyremote.sourceforge.net/) - remote control on Linux through Bluetooth, InfraRed, Wi-Fi or TCP/IP connection. This is additional review request for 433135 and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433219] New: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anyremote at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.6-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn Description: gAnyRemote package is GTK GUI frontend for anyRemote (http://anyremote.sourceforge.net/) - remote control on Linux through Bluetooth, InfraRed, Wi-Fi or TCP/IP connection. This is additional review request for 433135 and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171852.m1HIqPp3022363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 13:52 EST ------- The item "Short Description" in CVS Request template is actually "Summary" in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171849.m1HInT5H021760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-17 13:49 EST ------- 2 Mamoru Tasaka: Bug 433219: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote Bug 433220: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171855.m1HIt1UX022649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-17 13:55 EST ------- OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:55:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171855.m1HItGt1032502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-17 13:55 EST ------- OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 18:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171857.m1HIvwLq000322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-17 13:57 EST ------- .. I also mistyped the owner, in order to change to I need to file a "Package Change Request" ? ..as cvs admin requests are processed per half an hour ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171923.m1HJNAkK004511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-17 14:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295109) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295109&action=view) PATCH fixing 64 bit crash -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:22:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171922.m1HJMKPW004439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-17 14:22 EST ------- Like I said I'm going to set the approved flag, second try :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171921.m1HJLnou004370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-17 14:21 EST ------- I've done a full review, result below. Unfortunately I cannot approve this package as every package should have atleast one patch. Luckily I found a 64 bit bug, causing the package to fail to work (crash) on 64 bit. So I've written a patch fixing this so that we can meet the every package should have atleast one patch rule. MUST FIX -------- * Apply the to be attached patch fixing crashing on 64 bit. The patch may look strange for a 64 bit patch, but it really fixes a 64 bit issue: -The header in question contains guards to protect it from multiple inclusion -These guards where copy pasted from another header without changing the define checked and set, therefor this header things its already included while its not -This causes various prototypes to not be declared, and the compiler to assume their return type is int (aka 32 bits) -However some return a pointer, which should be 64 bit and now gets truncated to 32 bits. -Boom (aka crash) Should Fix ---------- * Send the 64 bit patch upstream * Ask upstream to use freedesktop.org icon installation location instead of obsolete /usr/share/pixmaps Although there is a MUST FIX, I trust you to include the patch so I'm going to set the approved flag, please include the patch before building the first time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171923.m1HJNlxV027291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 14:23 EST ------- aldo-0.7.5-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:24:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:24:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171924.m1HJOmvc027343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 14:24 EST ------- aldo-0.7.5-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171926.m1HJQf6s027925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2008-02-17 14:26 EST ------- http://hg.lewk.org/TurboFlot/raw-file/9fb8a0f1bb73/python-turboflot.spec http://pypi.python.org/packages/any/T/TurboFlot/python-turboflot-0.0.5-2.fc8.src.rpm I recreated the rpm with the upstream sources listed in Source0. I also now use %{version} in the Source0, and have modified the URL to point to the Python Package Index, instead of my blog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171926.m1HJQXkm005196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-17 14:26 EST ------- Thanks John and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:38:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171938.m1HJc4Bi029547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-02-17 14:38 EST ------- Beno?t: Fixed this in: Spec URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171935.m1HJZOcj029325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 rbhalera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rbhalera at redhat.com 2008-02-17 14:35 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b5f792b2fb76b7448c96f6a8f77b1390 Sarai_07.ttf + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + font is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 19:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802171954.m1HJsj9G031852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From iphands at yahoo.com 2008-02-17 14:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Still not > * Actually this does not build. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=422215 > * Fedora specific compilation flags are yet not honored. > Please recheck the section "Compiler flags" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > You can check what flags are used for Fedora now by > `rpm --eval %optflags`. > * The installation directory is perhaps wrong. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Installing lib/unix/libdzcom.a to /var/tmp/dz0.9.9i-2.fc9-root-mockbuild/lib > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Shared libraries must be installed into %_libdir or /%_lib (in > some special cases). On 64 bits this is /usr/lib64, not /usr/lib. > Perhaps you want to use %configure macro > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > * BuildRoot does not match Fedora guidelines. > > The package has its own root dir in the zipfile... (I don't know the procedure > > with this) > What do you mean by this? Okay the CFLAGS should be honored now. I changed the BuildRoot to match what is suggested in the guidelines. I can not figure out why the %configure macro doesn't work. When I enable it the build fails right after (or during?) the find-debuginfo.sh... It seems the script is looking for the directory "/var/tmp/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" which is not there. Any hints? Thanks, -Ian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:09:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172009.m1HK96X6001924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-17 15:09 EST ------- Much better. :-) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433223] New: Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433223 Summary: Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gstreamermm-0.9.2-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gstreamermm.spec Description: GStreamermm is a C++ wrapper library for the multimedia library GStreamer. It is designed to allow C++ development of applications that work with multi-media. GStreamermm is part of the gtkmm project. Notes: - Tarball comes with empty COPYING file, so the SRPM provides its own of LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:29:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433129] Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172029.m1HKT4VF014347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433129 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-17 15:29 EST ------- URL and Source0 no longer exist, new ones appear to be http://makovick.googlepages.com/gkrellmplugins + the tarball URL there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:28:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] New: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfmx.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfmx-20071115-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The dvipdfmx (formerly dvipdfm-cjk) project provides an eXtended version of the dvipdfm, a DVI to PDF translator developed by Mark A. Wicks. Commentary: Another package currently part of texlive, for which texlive is not upstream, hence the desire to split it out as a separate package. dvipdfm seems to be unmaintained, and so dvipdfmx should probably be considered to be upstream for dvipdfm. I note that texlive currently ships both dvipdfm and dvipdfmx. Can we just ship dvipddfxm - does it have all the functionality of dvipdfm? I have included the cdi-x.map stuff from texlive spec file, but I'm not 100 percent sure this is still needed. Currently this package obsoletes and provides dvipdfm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:47:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172047.m1HKlj8b007954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-17 15:47 EST ------- >Are You serious ? Using of %{name} is clearly specified at >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Right, but you don't need to write: %define name anyremote %define version 4.3 Name: %{name} Version: %{version} You can write directly: Name: anyremote Version: 4.3 and use %{name} in the rest of the spec file without using %define Name and %define Version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] New: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis at poolshark.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc-2.18.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: distcc is a program to distribute compilation of C or C++ code across several machines on a network. distcc should always generate the same results as a local compile, is simple to install and use, and is often two or more times faster than a local compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:55:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172055.m1HKtcjC018731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-02-17 15:55 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 174883 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 20:55:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172055.m1HKtd8i018761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-02-17 15:55 EST ------- *** Bug 433228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172104.m1HL4WPe010930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DUPLICATE | ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-17 16:04 EST ------- The bug you're pointing to is a stalled 2+ year old review. Please leave this open and let review go through, then we'll let Fesco rule on the competing reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172115.m1HLFh1P022226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |laurent.rineau__fedora at norma | |lesup.org ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-17 16:15 EST ------- I have been involded in bug #174883, and I agree with Denis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225941] Merge Review: java_cup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172117.m1HLHF4T022457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: java_cup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225941 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-17 16:17 EST ------- I took the package maintainership. Anyone willing to do the review would be very welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172128.m1HLSb9n014703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-02-17 16:28 EST ------- Hi Denis and Laurent, please pardon my knee-jerk reaction of marking this as a duplicate. I've also been following bug #174883 and was hoping that it would make better progress. But perhaps that's too much optimism... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:31:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172131.m1HLVIkV024635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-17 16:31 EST ------- dvipdfm is not obsoleted by dvipdfmx in my opinion, and still maintained, last version is from 05.03.2007 which is pretty recent. Both packages can cohabit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172143.m1HLhMD6026290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-17 16:43 EST ------- Yeah, there was a minor release in 2007 which incorporated two patches, but no major development. Before that, last release was 2001. I agree that both can co-exist, but what functionality is provided by dvipdfm that's not in dvipdfmx? If there's good reason, I'll knock up a dvipdfm package, but if there's no technical reason, I'd rather not bother. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172145.m1HLjDh7017417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-17 16:45 EST ------- But yes, given that both can co-exist, I'll remove the Obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 21:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172147.m1HLlKdi027068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-02-17 16:47 EST ------- Updated 2-14-08 see http://thenerdshow.com/rpm for directory listing of latest work in progress -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172206.m1HM6DcO021072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-17 17:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Yeah, there was a minor release in 2007 which incorporated two patches, but no > major development. Before that, last release was 2001. That's not necessarily bad, it may also be that dvipdfm is mature. > I agree that both can co-exist, but what functionality is provided by dvipdfm > that's not in dvipdfmx? If there's good reason, I'll knock up a dvipdfm package, > but if there's no technical reason, I'd rather not bother. I don't know exactly what you mean by technical reason. In any case dvipdfm is already in texlive, so maybe it is not worth bothering packaging it separately if it is not updated more often than texlive. However I think that a dvipdfm package should stay, especially if it works well and isn't updated often. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172216.m1HMG7A5031781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-02-17 17:16 EST ------- Here's a quick and not-yet-complete review: - ok : follows naming guidelines - ok : source matches upstream: 88e4c15826bdbc5a3de0f7c1bcb429e558c6976d distcc-2.18.3.tar.bz2 88e4c15826bdbc5a3de0f7c1bcb429e558c6976d distcc-2.18.3.tar.bz2.1 - ok : license (GPLv2+) appears to be correct - ok : license appears in source and included in %doc - ok : spec file looks sane/legible - ok : built using "mock -r fedora-8-x86_64 distcc-2.18.3-1.fc8.src.rpm" - rpmlint reports: distcc.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/distcc-2.18.3/NEWS distcc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/distccd $prog distcc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/distccd $prog distcc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/init.d/distccd $prog distcc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name distccd where the file-not-utf8 warning can be ignored and the four other warnings appear to be due to the package name being "distcc-server" (and not distcc or distccd) which means they are also harmless - ok : no need for ldconfig and no *.la files - ok : dir ownership looks good - ok : no need for -devel - ok : use of %clean and "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" at start of %install Nits: - perhaps use Source0: http://distcc.samba.org/ftp/distcc/distcc-%{version}.tar.bz2 which seems to be the prefered link from the web site Next, I'll install it on a few machines and give it a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172222.m1HMMBVr023454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-17 17:22 EST ------- rpmlint says: dvipdfmx.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) dvipdfmx.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/dvipdfmx-20071115/NEWS It seems to me that version should be 0 and release should be 0.x.20071115. However, dvipdfmx in texlive is already at release 16, so it seems to me that it can be 17.x.20071115. Or even x.20071115 with x beginning at 17. Why the texlive-texmf BuildRequires? The files %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2 %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V are already owned by texlive-texmf-fonts, which package should own them? In the texlive spec, there is, for the dvipdfmx subpackage: # for cmap files Requires: texlive-texmf-fonts = %{texlive_ver} I think that it would be better to list explicitly the files in %_bindir, to avoid surprises. I suggest adding INSTALL='install -p' to make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:21:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172221.m1HMLQ85032674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From stephan at xfce.org 2008-02-17 17:21 EST ------- I am pretty sure this is an environment issue, so I wonder: Is this bug still valid? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:22:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] New: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/demorse.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/demorse-0.8-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: demorse is a non-interactive command line tool for decoding Morse code signals into text. demorse detects the "dihs" and "dahs" that make a Morse code character via the computer's sound card, which can be connected to a radio receiver tuned to a CW Morse code transmission or to a tone generator. Packages build on F7 and F8 all are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172232.m1HMWk0T025199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-02-17 17:32 EST ------- Yes, ristretto 0.0.16 still crashes and suffers from GLib-GObject-CRITICAL errors on both F8 and rawhide. Attaching two traces, this time with the necessary debuginfo installed ;). First is the crash when you click on the main area, second is the crash when zooming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172234.m1HMYOud025429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #265271|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-02-17 17:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295113) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295113&action=view) Trace of ristretto 0.0.16 crashing when the main area is clicked -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172235.m1HMZM1n002482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #265541|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-02-17 17:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295114) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295114&action=view) Trace of ristretto 0.0.16 crashing when trying to zoom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172244.m1HMixYB026986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-02-17 17:44 EST ------- Stephan, I just read your announcement for 0.0.17 and updated my package. Still no joy. You want me to do more traces? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 22:57:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 17:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351531] Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172257.m1HMv9J5005747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ristretto - Image-viewer for the Xfce desktop environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351531 ------- Additional Comments From stephan at xfce.org 2008-02-17 17:57 EST ------- No, I'll see what I can do with what you gave me so far. It is really interesting to see that as of now, fedora is the only distro that can reproduce this. Ristretto is available on several different operating-systems and only you have this bug. Thanks for the information so far, I'll take a look at it. ^_^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 23:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172309.m1HN95Qq007853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-17 18:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint says: > > dvipdfmx.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) > dvipdfmx.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/dvipdfmx-20071115/NEWS > OK, will fix. > It seems to me that version should be 0 and release should be > 0.x.20071115. However, dvipdfmx in texlive is already at release 16, so > it seems to me that it can be > 17.x.20071115. Or even x.20071115 with x beginning at 17. > Well, here I'd agree we should have something like x.20071115 as the version number, but I don't like the 17 - what happens when upstream get to 1.0 for example. This seems like a legitimate use of epoch to me. What do you think? > Why the texlive-texmf BuildRequires? > For the macro definitions eg. _texmf_main etc. > The files > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2 > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V > are already owned by texlive-texmf-fonts, which package should own them? > I think these should be in the dvipdfmx package, as they originate from that tarball - will wait for Jindrich to comment on this also. > In the texlive spec, there is, for the dvipdfmx subpackage: > # for cmap files > Requires: texlive-texmf-fonts = %{texlive_ver} > Yes, I can do that in this package also. > I think that it would be better to list explicitly the files > in %_bindir, to avoid surprises. > OK. > I suggest adding INSTALL='install -p' to make install. OK. Can't help wondering why this isn't a guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 23:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172318.m1HNIAmG009377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-17 18:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > > It seems to me that version should be 0 and release should be > > 0.x.20071115. However, dvipdfmx in texlive is already at release 16, so > > it seems to me that it can be > > 17.x.20071115. Or even x.20071115 with x beginning at 17. > > > > Well, here I'd agree we should have something like x.20071115 as the version > number, but I don't like the 17 - what happens when upstream get to 1.0 for > example. This seems like a legitimate use of epoch to me. What do you think? I am not saying the same. I am saying 0 for the version, and x.20071115 for the release. > > Why the texlive-texmf BuildRequires? > > > > For the macro definitions eg. _texmf_main etc. I think it would be better to define them in case they are not defined, and this deserves a comment. > > The files > > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/EUC-UCS2 > > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-H > > %{_texmf_main}/fonts/cmap/UniKSCms-UCS2-V > > are already owned by texlive-texmf-fonts, which package should own them? > > > > I think these should be in the dvipdfmx package, as they originate from that > tarball - will wait for Jindrich to comment on this also. Indeed. > > In the texlive spec, there is, for the dvipdfmx subpackage: > > # for cmap files > > Requires: texlive-texmf-fonts = %{texlive_ver} > > > > Yes, I can do that in this package also. No, this is only needed if the files come from texlive-texmf-fonts. Though maybe dvipdfmx needs texlive-texmf-fonts for other reasons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 17 23:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802172336.m1HNaGTI002771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 ------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond at gmail.com 2008-02-17 18:36 EST ------- With much further ado, here is an updated version of the package. It should be closer to what the final spec is going to look like. SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-zlib-0.4.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm spec: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-zlib.spec Reviewing it will probably have to work like this. This file is going to closely match the Haskell Packaging Guidelines draft. (in fact so closely, that the actual text of this spec file will be linked to it, as an example.) This package needs to be checked against the rest of the review processes and rules. If there are any conflicts between this and the review rules, we'll edit the draft to match something more correct. The same applies to other issues or problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 00:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180024.m1I0O1jL010180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-17 19:24 EST ------- > perhaps use Source0: Whoops. Fixed. Rev 1 also came with a problematic server init script. Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc-2.18.3-2.fc8.src.rpm A couple of open-ended question: - The server RPM won't "start" as shipped. This is by design, in the sense that distcc is a tool that really needs to be configured manually (and carefully). One could argue that we should ship with '--allow 127.0.0.1' by default, but that configuration is not useful in itself, so I prefer the first option, but I'm open for discussion. - In the same spirit of keeping the package simple and not doing too much configuration, I did not add a logrotate and separate log file, but chose to let the default syslog behavior. However it seems distccd has a tendency to spam /var/log/messages quite a lot, so I'm having second thoughts about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 00:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180044.m1I0ikkr013284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-02-17 19:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Without the netcgi1 patch I can't get cduce to compile: > > > > Checking for package camlp4... ok > > Checking for package num... ok > > Checking for package pcre... ok > > Checking for package ulex... ok > > Checking for package cgi... ocamlfind: Package `cgi' not found > > failed ! > > Ok, we fixed it in the svn version. Now if cgi package is not found > then cduce is build but dtd2cduce and and the web interface interpreter > are not. Thanks for the bug report. It now uses the netcgi1 package provided by ocaml-ocamlnet-xxx.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 01:24:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180124.m1I1OxJ7029754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-02-17 20:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfmx.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/dvipdfmx-0-0.20.20071115cvs.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Feb 17 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 0-0.20.20071115cvs - Remove obsolete and Provides for dvipdfm - Explicitly list contents of bindir in file list - Fix version and release tags to be guideline conforming - Add INSTALL='install -p' to make install - Add macro definitions from texlive-texmf spec file in case not defined - Remove NEWS and TODO from doc file list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 02:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433129] Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180213.m1I2D1bx006153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-weather - Weather plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433129 ------- Additional Comments From adam at spicenitz.org 2008-02-17 21:13 EST ------- Whoops, I made this change, but didn't check it in. Please try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 02:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180218.m1I2IAQ3007003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 wilmer at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: MyBashBurn -|Review Request: MyBashBurn - |burn data and songs. |Burn data and create songs | |with interactive dialogs. ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-17 21:18 EST ------- Hi Kevin, I guess that it sounds more correct in English. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mybashburn Short Description: "Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs." Owners: wilmer Branches: F-8 InitialCC: wilmer Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 02:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180225.m1I2PHrv030803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-17 21:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: evolution-rss Short Description: Evolution RSS Reader Plugin Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 03:16:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180316.m1I3GDj5007673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-17 22:16 EST ------- thx for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 03:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180316.m1I3GEtE007702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 Bug 239936 depends on bug 431310, which changed state. Bug 431310 Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 03:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:16:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180316.m1I3GFqt007725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 Bug 285351 depends on bug 431310, which changed state. Bug 431310 Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 03:30:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180330.m1I3UkNZ020227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmz at pobox.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-02-17 22:30 EST ------- Hi Bob, I have a few quick questions and minor suggested changes while I do a more detailed review. /usr/sbin should be replaced with %{_sbindir} in the file list Adding a space between the changelog entries helps things like "make clog" work better and makes the changelog easier to read. Why is the devel package needed? What is the purpose of the cwtest.c file? (This might be irrelevant if a devel package isn't really needed, but why does the devel package Require pkgconfig, it does not ship a .pc file?) The README section on testing says to run test/cwtest.sh, but this location won't exist for users of the rpm. Is the test really needed? If so, the package would need to depend on nc (netcat) for it to work. And the README should probably be changed to refer to the location that the test script is installed. (Unless the test is really needed, I'd be inclined to not package it.) The manpage says to see @prefix@/share/cwdaemon/README for a description of the circuitry, usage and testing of cwdaemon. But this file isn't installed (it's removed in the spec file). Perhaps a symlink should be created? Something like: ln -sv %{docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README %{_datadir}/%{name}/README should create the link. Then include it in the file list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 04:14:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180414.m1I4EghC016870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |foolish at guezz.net ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-17 23:14 EST ------- I agree on the changelog line breaks, change made. I also fixed the sbin macro and created the link for the second README location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 04:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:46:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180446.m1I4klN8021789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-17 23:46 EST ------- We are not sure if other packages will need the test.c that is why we included the -devel with that. We have been unable to find any software that needs it but we have only looked at about 10% of the ham related software available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180502.m1I527oW001972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 00:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > ln -sv %{docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README %{_datadir}/%{name}/README > > should create the link. Then include it in the file list. Well, current spec file --------------------------------------------------------------------- #don't include this twice rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/README #Lets make a simlink instead ln -sv %{docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README %{_datadir}/%{name}/README ............................ %files %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README TODO ............................ %{_datadir}/%{name}/README --------------------------------------------------------------------- is wrong because of the following reason. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. In other words, a package should work properly with "rpm -ivh --excludedocs". For this package when "--excludedocs" is used - %{docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README is not installed - But the symlink %{_datadir}/%{name}/README is created this causes this symlink broken, which must be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180513.m1I5Dkjg003739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-18 00:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=434204 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. cce9edb41b4a8308e0ef0eea24b5a1ab epdfview-0.1.6.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + update-desktop-database scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180513.m1I5DTcd026002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 00:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) Updated the spec again. Original srpm still, will rebuild if you need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180513.m1I5Dk1p026049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-18 00:13 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build=> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=434209 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libv4l2.so libv4l2.so.0.0.0 unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libdcam.so libdcam.so.0.0.0 unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libv4l.so libv4l.so.0.0.0 unicap-devel.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/unicap2/cpi/libvid21394.so libvid21394.so.0.0.0 unicap-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ==> ok to accpet here. + source files match upstream. 0ab0a533f5c1ff3a24853d2564ffb14f unicap-0.2.19.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + libucil.pc, libunicap.pc, libunicapgtk.pc files present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Package unicap-0.2.19-3.fc9 -> Provides: libdcam.so.0 libucil.so.2 libunicap.so.2 libunicapgtk.so.2 libv4l.so.0 libv4l2.so.0 libvid21394.so.0 Requires: libXext.so.6 libXv.so.1 libasound.so.2 libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4) libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2 libdcam.so.0 libdl.so.2 libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.1) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libogg.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libraw1394.so.8 librt.so.1 libtheora.so.0 libtheora.so.0(libtheora.so.1.0) libucil.so.2 libunicap.so.2 libunicapgtk.so.2 libv4l.so.0 libv4l2.so.0 libvid21394.so.0 libvorbis.so.0 libvorbisenc.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package unicap-devel-0.2.19-3.fc9 -> Requires: libdcam.so.0 libucil.so.2 libunicap.so.2 libunicapgtk.so.2 libv4l.so.0 libv4l2.so.0 libvid21394.so.0 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180545.m1I5jnZ8031609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-02-18 00:45 EST ------- Curse bugzilla. It just ate a ton of comments I'd made. :( Mamoru is right about the link being a bad idea. Sorry about that. It might be best to just patch the man page. Maybe I'm being pedantic, but I hate it when man pages and other docs point me to things that don't exist. I'm still unclear on the point of the devel package. I don't see how any other apps are expected to make use of this single c source file. Without knowing how apps use it, I don't see any reason to include it. Can you ask upstream or find some apps that use it as is? I imagine that the intent is to have it compiled to be of use. I am also curious how the daemon is to be used, whether it's a long running daemon, run from xinetd, or something kicked off from the command line as needed? Bob, you mentioned in #fedora-devel that other apps would start it on demand. Can you elaborate a bit on that and perhaps point to some examples? (Please pardon my ignorance as a non-ham. :) Looking at the README, it directs users to see "the examples in the schematics directory." But that refers to a dir in the tarball. The files it's referring to are installed in %{_datadir}/%{name}. It seems to me that those examples belong in %docdir instead (and the README updated accordingly so readers can find the files easily). That leaves cwdaemon.png and two shell scripts in %{_datadir}/%{name} (cwsetup.sh and cwtest.sh). The png could also be put into %docdir I believe (it's not used for anything, is it?). Are either of the shell scripts needed if the rpm does the setup correctly? cwsetup looks mostly useless for the package. cwtest.sh may be of use. It seems that these script, if needed, should be installed somewhere in $PATH. cwtest.sh requires nc as well. One other small thing, it's better to use %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8.gz for the manpage instead of %{_datadir}/man. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 05:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180547.m1I5lIKm009018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2008-02-18 00:47 EST ------- Thanks for taking the time out to review, Jan :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-turboflot Short Description: A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library Owners: lmacken Branches: F-8 F-7 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 06:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180612.m1I6Cadw003784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 01:12 EST ------- qle is a package that Requires cwdaemon we have a srpm and spec started at http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/#qle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 06:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] New: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: assim.deodia at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Dotconf is an configuration file parser which is used by many application to handle configuration files. - It is apache compitable - Context sensitivity framework - Provides autoconf macros for checking for dot.conf - Substitution of environment variables -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 06:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180633.m1I6XmAg017202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 06:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180635.m1I6Zcxn017732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 01:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I am also curious how the daemon is to be used, whether it's a long running > daemon, run from xinetd, or something kicked off from the command line as > needed? Bob, you mentioned in #fedora-devel that other apps would start it on > demand. Can you elaborate a bit on that and perhaps point to some examples? > (Please pardon my ignorance as a non-ham. :) > See my above link to qle. > Looking at the README, it directs users to see "the examples in the schematics > directory." But that refers to a dir in the tarball. The files it's referring > to are installed in %{_datadir}/%{name}. It seems to me that those examples > belong in %docdir instead (and the README updated accordingly so readers can > find the files easily). > > That leaves cwdaemon.png and two shell scripts in %{_datadir}/%{name} > (cwsetup.sh and cwtest.sh). The png could also be put into %docdir I believe > (it's not used for anything, is it?). Are either of the shell scripts needed if > the rpm does the setup correctly? cwsetup looks mostly useless for the package. > cwtest.sh may be of use. It seems that these script, if needed, should be > installed somewhere in $PATH. cwtest.sh requires nc as well. > I do not know how to change the README file, I have asked my mentor for assistance. In the mean time I updated SPEC and SRPM http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/cwdaemon.spec http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/cwdaemon-0.9.4-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 06:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180656.m1I6ueXH010991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-18 01:56 EST ------- Seeing how this was rebuilt Aug 29 2007 by rel-eng and Dec 07 2007 by Alex Lancaster, and you took it over Dec 6 2007, I'd argue the rereview is not necessary unless we're really really pedantic (the last rebuild was 3 months 1 week before you took it over and the next one was one day after you took it over and not by you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 07:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180711.m1I7BEl6013788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 redhat at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From redhat at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-18 02:11 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unicap Short Description: Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices Owners: robert Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 07:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180733.m1I7XcpB027074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-18 02:33 EST ------- Dropping review for lack of response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 08:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802180828.m1I8S2vd026802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-18 03:28 EST ------- That is true, but: + Since last July none of the newer upstream releases were built and it has been even longer since Paul last touched it. + The last couple of successful re-builds were just "bump the %{release} and re-build" and did not clean-up any of the cruft that had gathered with time: * Fri Dec 07 2007 Alex Lancaster 1:2.2.0-4 - Rebuild for new openssl * Wed Aug 29 2007 Fedora Release Engineering - 1:2.2.0-3 - Rebuild for selinux ppc32 issue. If you still think the review is not needed, then I will close it and carry on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 10:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181026.m1IAQe4V031119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-18 05:26 EST ------- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sarai-fonts Short Description: Owners: sundaram,pnemade Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 10:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181037.m1IAbBsH023109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-18 05:37 EST ------- The spec file seems correct, the package builds in mock and the program works properly. I write the Italian description, if You want include this with the other languages: %description -l it Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) e' una piattaforma software per il calcolo distribuito: molti progetti appartenenti a varie discipline scientifiche si appoggiano ad esso per eseguire i propri calcoli nei periodi di inattivita' del computer che lo esegue. Il BOINC core client e' richiesto per partecipare a qualsiasi progetto che usa BOINC. Un server centrale distribuisce unita' di lavoro e raccoglie i risultati tramite questo client. Quando una macchina locale viene collegate al progetto, viene scaricato in automatico l'applicazione specifica del progetto che viene eseguita tramite il wrapper del BOINC core client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 10:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181044.m1IAi0Vq001739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-02-18 05:43 EST ------- Thanks, I've added it of course! Could you provide also the Summary(it) field? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 10:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433094] Review Request: watsup - System monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181052.m1IAqqbX025962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: watsup - System monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433094 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 10:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433029] Review Request: fotox - Image processing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181053.m1IAr20t003544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433029 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 11:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181107.m1IB7OBA006392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-18 06:07 EST ------- Can we drop this package from fedora if nobody willing to maintain this or mark this as orphaned? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 11:16:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427010] Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181116.m1IBGJ4F008050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: abcmusiex - Training music score (pentagram) reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427010 rodolfo.alcazar at padep.org.bo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rodolfo.alcazar at padep.org.bo 2008-02-18 06:16 EST ------- I'm very sorry for the delays in answering. I didn't find no one wit whom co-mantain the package, and become a couple of suggestions. I should work more on the package, so i'll mark this bug as closed. Thanks a lot, Jason, for your cooperation. Best to you all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 11:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181124.m1IBONgP032018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 06:24 EST ------- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (crystalspace) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 12:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181217.m1ICHUMG009862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-02-18 07:17 EST ------- I want to maintain this package, If there are no objections? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 12:33:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:33:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181233.m1ICXIFE022479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-02-18 07:33 EST ------- Sure, generally I like design proposed by Hans in comment #12. I like the idea of two user groups design, one designed for embedding into other apps and another patchset for music composers. Mamoru's approach seems to be more general, I don't like timidity++.cfg creation in %post, where the configuration would be dependent on random patchset state in /usr/share/soundfonts/. The new soundfonts really should have virtual provides such as soundfont2 as proposed by Hans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181303.m1ID3SiL019249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarnes at redhat.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mbarnes at redhat.com| |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181314.m1IDETUY031002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181315.m1IDFMC0031507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181315.m1IDFx91031611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181332.m1IDWgI9002655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 08:32 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK (BSD and GPLv2+) Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum matches) Compile and Build: - F-7: with update for libax25-devel currently pending: OK - F-8: with update for libax25-devel currently pending: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: Not targeted Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~149K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181334.m1IDYOqs025761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:47:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181347.m1IDl4FK006576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 08:47 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sums match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK (with libax25-devel from pending updates) - F-8: OK (with libax25-devel from pending updates) - rawhide: OK - EL-5: Not targeted Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~342K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181350.m1IDoqhS007545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 08:50 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ax25-apps Short Description: AX.25 ham radio applications Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 13:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 08:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181353.m1IDrOmc008093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 08:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ax25-tools Short Description: Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] New: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/lpsolve/lpsolve.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/lpsolve/lpsolve-5.5.0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Linear Programming (MILP) solver, an OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:03:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181403.m1IE3pgv010835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181401.m1IE1QUe010324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 09:01 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sums match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: Undersized (~5.7K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A, OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181406.m1IE6n2Q011775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 09:06 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: colrdx Short Description: Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181421.m1IELZ3S015180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-02-18 09:21 EST ------- You have a typo at lines 28 and 96 in the spec: gnome-extended-menu.sh should be gnome-menu-extended.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 14:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181428.m1IESYUl016329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 mschmidt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-02-18 09:28 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: epdfview Short Description: Lightweight PDF document viewer Owners: michich Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:01:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181501.m1IF1qKT013698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 pauln at truemesh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From pauln at truemesh.com 2008-02-18 10:01 EST ------- Will review this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181506.m1IF6Fhr024723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181505.m1IF5svW024574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 10:05 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sums match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~147K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A (OK) %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: OK Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181529.m1IFTU2m028767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-18 10:29 EST ------- I have updated the srpm. The link is still the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181532.m1IFWAYT019813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 10:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpsk31 Short Description: PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433029] Review Request: fotox - Image processing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181546.m1IFkI6k022792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433029 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-18 10:46 EST ------- Could you look into: Bug ID: 433033: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle 433095: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation There are programs looks like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:47:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429700] Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181547.m1IFl87n032519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429700 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-18 10:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bing Short Description: bandwidth ping Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] New: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-2.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch/opengrok-0.5-2.c4dea0135445.fc8.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-2.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch/ Description: A wicked fast source browser OpenGrok is a fast and usable source code search and cross reference engine, written in Java. It helps you search, cross-reference and navigate your source tree. It can understand various program file formats and version control histories like SCCS, RCS, CVS, Subversion and Mercurial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433095] Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181546.m1IFkPVr032434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433095 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-18 10:46 EST ------- Could you look into: Bug ID: 433033: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle 433095: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation There are programs looks like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:50:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181550.m1IFoaUd000835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-18 10:50 EST ------- Yeah, the header probably shouldn't ship, I can't think of a reason for including it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch Short Description: Xorg diamondtouch input driver Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:54:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:54:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181554.m1IFsSdr024160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 10:54 EST ------- Thank you for the patch! The upstream developer replied that he applied the fix on svn. Also upstream asked me: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Some debian users reported that mounting removable devices (usb disk, cdrom) in pcmanfm 0.3.5.23 from the side pane (with --enable-hal turned on) will cause crashes (seg. faults). However, we cannot reproduce the bug on ubuntu by any means, and from the gdb backtrace, the crash happened in libhal. We have no idea how could this happens. Would you please get this tested on Fedora, and I wish that good programmer can help reviewing this part. It's mainly in src/vfs/vfs-volume-hal.c, and most of the source code was taken from gnome-mount and exo-mount of xfce. This is the main blocker of 0.3.6 release. We'll make this stable release after this potential bug get resolved. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This bug seems reproducible to me although for now I am not sure if this bug is caused really by hal side. For now I disabled to mount removal devices by pcmanfm by a patch. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/pcmanfm/pcmanfm-0.3.5.23-2.fc8.src.rpm * Mon Feb 18 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 0.3.5.23-2 - Apply patch to fix crash on 64bits arch as suggested by Hans (bug 433182) - Disable to mount removable devices for now --------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pcmanfm Short Description: Extremly fast and lightweight file manager Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 15:57:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251828] Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181557.m1IFvHVn002016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251828 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-18 10:57 EST ------- Building for rawhide with additional chmod goodness. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181601.m1IG1QTd025808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-18 11:01 EST ------- When updating the package you should bump the release and add a changelog entry so that it is known what was changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181601.m1IG1V6F003202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |opengrok-review ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:01 EST ------- And -- this won't run, I forgot %{_bindir}/opengrok from older version. I am aware of this and will fix it once I roll new packages: /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find lucene-core-2.1.0.jar Java extension for this JVM /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find lucene-spellchecker-2.1.0.jar Java extension for this JVM /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Could not find svn-javahl.jar Java extension for this JVM /usr/bin/build-classpath: error: Some specified jars were not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181600.m1IG04nd002859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:00 EST ------- Note: This is by no means complete. This reports exists to keep track of packaging progress and to simplify cooperation on packaging. Comments from experienced Java packagers are very welcome. If you aware that any of these are already packaged please make a note here: ant-tools lucene-core 2.2.0 lucene-spellchecker 2.2.0 servlet-api swing-layout 0.9 JRCS is no longer part of Apache commons. But OpenGrok can not use the new ones anyways as they reportedly don't include necessary fixes. The opengrok source package contains ./ext/jrcs.zip that must be used to build these (we can fearlessly install them, as they won't clash with anything existing for sure): org.apache.commons.jrcs.diff org.apache.commons.jrcs.rcs To build it you need it itself [1] and newer jflex [2] (which is covered by bug #433272) (source to it is in the same directory, needs rawhide java_cup to compile). [1] http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-2.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch/opengrok-0.5-2.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch.rpm [2] http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/jflex/jflex-1.4.1-2jpp.2.fc8.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181603.m1IG36wi003623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433070] Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181605.m1IG50wo003872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: java-1.6.0-icedtea - The IcedTea 1.6.0 runtime environment. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433070 ------- Additional Comments From langel at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:05 EST ------- i have only been updated the sources, so I didn't see a need. I will in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:20:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181620.m1IGKbda029831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com 2008-02-18 11:20 EST ------- I ve made updates to fix the issues you described. speech-dispatcher-0.6.6 installs the python packages into /usr/lib/ by default unless I dont mention the prefix explicitly in ./configure Since you advised me to avoid that, I have installed python modules directly using the setuptools file provided. Also to prevent make install from breaking when it tries to install python packages to /usr/lib I have written separate make install for all the src directories which must be installed. I am not sure if this is advisable, but could not figure out a better approach. dotconf package request has been made, and I hope that it will be resolved soon. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181631.m1IGVEV4031988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 11:31 EST ------- md5sum between upstream source tarball and included tarball in SRPM do not match - did not yet run any other tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225816] Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181635.m1IGZZ0a000538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > gnome-doc-utils.src: W: invalid-license GFDL+ Changed to GFDL. > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: no-documentation Fixed some time ago. > gnome-doc-utils.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pkgconfig/gnome-doc-utils.pc > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xml2po.pc Invalid. See comment #2. > - /usr/share/gnome/help ownership: > Dunno if it would make sense have a different package (like filesystem) to > own this dir rather than yelp if it is problematic to require yelp? Please reopen bug #205799 if this is still an issue. > If GFDL is mentioned as an additional license for the .xml files then I think > LGPL+ should also be mentioned for the .xsl files. Added LGPLv2+. License changes applied to gnome-doc-utils-0.12.1-2.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:43:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432519] nss-mdns for EPEL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181643.m1IGhcM9011495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: nss-mdns for EPEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432519 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181643.m1IGhhNa002029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 11:43 EST ------- d96d63ba6f43b9d22ae8e910d4544d95 demorse-0.8.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:44:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427061] Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181644.m1IGiHwD002104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redmode - Switch to and from night red mode Alias: redmode-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427061 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:44 EST ------- Thank you!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181657.m1IGvNEB014289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-18 11:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gcx Short Description: Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 InitialCC: astronomy-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 16:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181655.m1IGtUAD014015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-18 11:55 EST ------- Yes, of course: Summary(it): BOINC client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:00:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181700.m1IH07B4014942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-18 12:00 EST ------- Kevin, true, I think your proposition is ok. Can you change it please? Thank you Lubomir for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181709.m1IH9ZR7007625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-18 12:09 EST ------- Description Line (too long) and mixed use of spaces and tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) weren't fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:17:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:17:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181717.m1IHH8Vk018485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 12:17 EST ------- Well, as this bug blocks speech-dispatcher (bug 432259) I want to approve this package soon, however it seems not a few issues needs fixing. For general packaging guidelines you can refer to the following pages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines For this package it seems to be a package for libraries so it would be good for you that you install rpmdevtools rpm and try: $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib dotconf to get a skeleton spec file for dotconf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:18:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181718.m1IHIuep009638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181722.m1IHMYFv010375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181721.m1IHLaHx019366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181725.m1IHPKXj020103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429700] Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181728.m1IHSNYn011451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429700 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:28 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:30:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181730.m1IHUTQa021004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:30 EST ------- cvs done. cvsadmin requests are processed as cvs admins have time to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181734.m1IHYfkY021466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 12:34 EST ------- Well, first of all your srpm does not build. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=435545 I guess you are rebuilding srpm as root? Please don't do it, i.e. please make it sure that your srpm builds as non-root users. As rebuild fails before executing find-debuginfo.sh currently I cannot figure out how find-debuginfo doesn't work for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181733.m1IHX7YB021336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181735.m1IHZefk012956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181734.m1IHY0Fu012362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:33 EST ------- Is there no Short Description here? Should it be "Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181737.m1IHbh25022324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:39:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181739.m1IHdnSm013491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:40:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181740.m1IHesGk014103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181738.m1IHc7Pb013233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 12:38 EST ------- By the way when you upload the new srpm/spec please change the release number every time you modify your spec file, and post the URL where you uploaded them on this bug so that we can find your newest spec/srpm easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181744.m1IHiNUv023406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181743.m1IHhCvw023292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:43 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:47:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:47:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181747.m1IHlJRa015143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:47:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181747.m1IHlcXE024119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-18 12:47 EST ------- Yes. Sorry I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427027] Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181750.m1IHoH07015991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PySBIG - PySBIG can read SBIG CCD files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427027 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 12:50 EST ------- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:50:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:50:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181750.m1IHoqYW016084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-18 12:50 EST ------- - LSB comment block missing, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SysVInitScript - Incorrect exit status (per LSB spec) when /usr/bin/distccd is not installed: should be 5 when $1 != status. What is this check needed for, BTW? - The init script does not appear to make any checks whether we're in a required configured state or not, which will probably lead to another incorrect exit status per the LSB spec and I guess a suboptimal error message. When unconfigured, exit status should be 6 when $1 != status. See for example how the vdr and hddtemp packages handle this more gracefully. - No profile.d snippet to have distcc in use out of the box? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 17:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181757.m1IHvUno025903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 12:57 EST ------- RPM Lint: Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK (from source code) %doc License: OK (missing COPYING or License file, upstream queried) Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sums match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: too small (~4.7K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A, OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Please remove the -debuginfo package by patching the upstreams Makefile, removing --strip on line ~17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181801.m1II1CQY018357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 13:01 EST ------- RPMLint is also OK btw ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181809.m1II9NB9028534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 13:09 EST ------- the --strip is removed in the Makefile patch already, not sure what else to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181817.m1IIHKXo021523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-18 13:17 EST ------- I cannot find where it gets -debuginfo from, if I run /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh manually it returns a couple of empty lists. So, not going to let this hold back the package: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207265] Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181819.m1IIJYVh030418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-interface - Zope interfaces package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207265 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2008-02-18 13:19 EST ------- Branched and built for EPEL4 and EPEL5: 38372 (python-zope-interface): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-4-epel/38372-python-zope-interface-3.0.1-10.el4/ 38371 (python-zope-interface): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38371-python-zope-interface-3.0.1-10.el5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181820.m1IIK380030824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-18 13:20 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: demorse Short Description: Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:37:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181837.m1IIbfeq001514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-18 13:37 EST ------- 0.18 is simple and sane. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181843.m1IIhKOW026250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-02-18 13:43 EST ------- Beno?t: Fixed this in: Spec URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:54:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181854.m1IIsh1R004396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-18 13:54 EST ------- fix W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.4-3 1.2.4-4.fc8 and I will do a full review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 18:52:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:52:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181852.m1IIqALN004102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 13:52 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lkundrak Short Description: Open Clip Art Library Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:09:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:09:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181909.m1IJ90dK031677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-18 14:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Right, but you don't need to write: > %define name anyremote Wow...it works ) Thank You for the advice ! Corrected *spec and *src.rpm are here: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433182] Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181926.m1IJQ44Y003468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcmanfm - Extremly fast and lightweight file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433182 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-18 14:26 EST ------- Successfully built on all branches, requested on bodhi, closing. Thank you for reviewing this package and for CVS procedure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181925.m1IJPIig003323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-18 14:25 EST ------- Upsie this got lost a bit, many apologies New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: podsleuth Short Description: Probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods Owners: dnielsen Branches: f8, f7 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181936.m1IJaZNc005855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433135 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181936.m1IJabVY005880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433135 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181937.m1IJbMY7005980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:36:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181936.m1IJaY1K005830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433219, 433220 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:37:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:37:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181937.m1IJb5ap013671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: ganyremote -|Review Request: ganyremote - |GTK frontend for anyremote |GTK frontend for anyremote -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 19:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432791] Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802181944.m1IJiseu015030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: epdfview - Lightweight PDF document viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432791 mschmidt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 20:16:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182016.m1IKGg9R013712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 15:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 20:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182015.m1IKF2b0013460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 15:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 20:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182019.m1IKJYG0022142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 15:19 EST ------- I assume the package name here should be "openclipart" and not "lkundrak" ? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 20:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182029.m1IKTu9J024204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-18 15:29 EST ------- Latest package is working fine, spec file looks sane and rpmlint output is adequate. Please, don't forgot to implement the wrapper for language issue. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 20:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182036.m1IKae6E017699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 15:36 EST ------- The debuginfo looks fine to me. It's so small because the executable in the main package is also very very small. It seems to be there and looks good though. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182100.m1IL0cgn030554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-18 16:00 EST ------- Sent off to the FSF for approval. 5d in the license concerns me, but we'll see what the FSF says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182110.m1ILA9bH025082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-18 16:10 EST ------- The only way this code is kosher is if we leverage the + in the license to make it GPLv3, since GPLv2 is incompatible with ASL 1.0. Please contact upstream and let them know about this issue, and urge them to either use GPLv3+ or relicense to avoid the issue. For the here and now, mark the license tag as "GPLv3+". Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:10:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182110.m1ILAal8025267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-02-18 16:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > qle is a package that Requires cwdaemon we have a srpm and spec started at > http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/#qle The qle docs suggest that cwdaemon should be running as a daemon. qle doesn't start it for you. The Debian cwdaemon packages setup a service in /etc/init.d. There is a draft guide for creating LSB compliant init scripts at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SysVInitScript I don't know if there are any other pages in the wiki with such examples or not. You can also look at many of the scripts in /etc/init.d to see how things are done currently. (In reply to comment #8) > I do not know how to change the README file, I have asked my mentor for > assistance. The Debian package installs a README.Debian in %docdir, which tells the user a little about how to start the service and use it in Debian. It also points the user to the README in %{_datadir}/%{name}. That might be a reasonable way to go here too. Also worth noting is that the Debian maintainer is the upstream cwdaemon maintainer. So if you run into any general issues that should be fixed to make the software more easily packaged, he may be amenable to making those changes upstream -- assuming the changes are generic and not Fedora specific. > In the mean time I updated SPEC and SRPM. With the devel package removed, the %files section can be simplified a bit. There's no need to use separate globs for the files in %{_datadir}/%{name}. Instead of: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.ps %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.jpg %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.sh %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.png You could just use: %{_datadir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182114.m1ILE7RN025895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 16:14 EST ------- opengrok-0.5-3.c4dea0135445 http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/opengrok/ ant-tools lucene-core 2.2.0 lucene-spellchecker 2.2.0 - servlet-api swing-layout 0.9 - org.apache.commons.jrcs.diff - org.apache.commons.jrcs.rcs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431955] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182115.m1ILFWW8001498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL-Mapper - Simple and flexible way to build nice URLs for web applications Alias: pear-URL-Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431955 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-18 16:15 EST ------- Built on all branches, thanks for the review! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182141.m1ILffrF031056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-18 16:41 EST ------- Ariszlo> Thanks, it's know run perfectly (well, but the software still need to be improve) Mamoru> Sorry, it's part of my laziness but I swear that I don't do it again. There are the uploaded links : Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.7-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:42:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:42:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182142.m1ILgoQN006655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 16:42 EST ------- Kevin: sure, thanks! /* it must have been some bad bad drugs */ Being imported now. Will let this bug open even after it's built as we track ideas about improvements here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182147.m1ILlLl4007527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-18 16:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sunbird Short Description: Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 21:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182159.m1ILx8xA009368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-18 16:59 EST ------- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crystalspace Short Description: Crystal Space a free 3D engine Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 22:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182200.m1IM0fqq009935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-18 17:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > imake provides makedepend which is used. > > Not a blocker, but a comment would be nice. Done. > > Not sure I understand about Site.local. Seems fine the way it is. > > My point is that Site.local is not really specific of ncl, one > could imagine that a file with the same name is in another package. > Disambiguating the same in SOURCES may be useful in settings where > the same SOURCES directory is used for all packages. > > As I said, only a suggestion. Ah, I always forget about shared SOURCES directories. Changed. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ncl-5.0.0-9.fc8.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/ncl.spec * Mon Feb 18 2008 - Orion Poplawski - 5.0.0-9 - Rename Site.local to Site.local.ncl - Add comment for imake BR Thanks again Patrice for your work. Anyone else out there willing to approve a package as it is (with having to register to download source)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 22:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182205.m1IM5VSN003465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-02-18 17:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) Pablo, thanks for working so hard on the package. The src.rpm is fine now but the spec still has gnome-extended-menu.sh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 22:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182217.m1IMHEvX005633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-18 17:17 EST ------- martin at gamesplace.info: why you've CC'ed yourself while this Review is closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 22:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182219.m1IMJfMJ013194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-18 17:19 EST ------- In reply to comment #7: Please don't. This bug is to track the reviewing of the package. Once it's imported and built this should be closed. Then you can file a new bug against this packages bugzilla component for any further issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 22:40:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431381] Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182240.m1IMeDNW009588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unicap - Library to access different kinds of (video) capture devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431381 redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-18 17:40 EST ------- 38378 (unicap): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. Package: unicap-0.2.19-3.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: unicap-0.2.19-3.fc8 Tag: dist-f8-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: unicap-0.2.19-3.fc9 Tag: dist-f9 Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 23:14:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430307] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182314.m1INEZLg016273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430307 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-02-18 18:14 EST ------- About 5d it just states that it must be said somewhere in the docs, on the site, in the program screens, in the readme files, in the troubleshooting guide or wherever you like that the scripts were falcon. I think it's a very small constraint, if relevant at all, and it's meant to protect the final user from concealing this information (that may be relevant to him) and the Falcon project from unauthorized commercial (i.e. closed source) exploitation. If you are using a C compiler you're compiling to object code, but if you're using a script you're using a virtual machine, and it may be a good idea for your users not to be spoiled from the right of knowing what they are running on their machines. I didn't want to deprive Falcon script writers of the ability to distribute commercial closed source applications, but in that case, I didn't want the fact of using Falcon to be obfuscated so that the end user didn't possibly know. I think this goes along OSI guidelines (certification process started), but it's a bit forceful on radical free software concept of FSF. In case they ask, I can give the grant to Fedora users to pick up FSF GPL3 or any later or Falcon FPLL license, wichever they prefer. Falcon's is just less restrictive, so it's their call. (actually, if they ask I can provide double licensing directly for Falcon itself. I don't mind if the users select a more restrictive license on their own will). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 23:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182324.m1INO630024970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-18 18:24 EST ------- Ok, no problem. But I'm still somewhat unclear about how to proceed; would you like me to commit my updated version to CVS, wholesale or only some parts of it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 18 23:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802182355.m1INtngM024163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-18 18:55 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is gained from the reporter by 26/02/2008. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 00:26:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190026.m1J0QM2K029955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-18 19:26 EST ------- I don't understand! You mean you want to maintain this package for RHEL via EPEL ? I don't even know which kernel is there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 00:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190039.m1J0dhti032161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-18 19:39 EST ------- Excellent. Ok so I rewrote the init file from scratch based on the packaging draft, that should address your comments above, the default behavior after installation now is to fail silently with code 6 (unconfigured). > No profile.d snippet to have distcc in use out of the box? I took a look at the profile.d setup you have for ccache, but I'm not thrilled about a similar setup for distcc. Unlike ccache, there's no advantage at all to having distcc run by default if it falls back to localhost everytime. The profile.d script could make it conditional on the hosts file being non-empty though (is that what you had in mind ?)... Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/distcc-2.18.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 00:42:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] New: Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 Summary: Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ugo.viti at initzero.it QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/synbak/download/synbak.spec SRPM URL: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/synbak/download/synbak-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: Synbak is an application designed to unify several backup methods. Synbak provides a powerful reporting system and a very simple interface for configuration files. Synbak is a wrapper for several existing backup programs suppling the end user with common method for configuration that will manage the execution logic for every single backup and will give detailed reports of backups result. Synbak can make backups using: - RSync over ssh, rsync daemon, smb and cifs protocols (automount functions) - Tar archives (tar, tar.gz and tar.bz2) - Tape devices (using multi loader changer tapes too) - LDAP databases - MySQL databases - Oracle databases - CD-RW/DVD-RW - Wget to mirror HTTP/FTP servers Synbak can make reports using: - EMail - HTML pages - RSS feeds Moreover, if you are a developer and want to contribute, the modular nature of synbak will allow you to easly write new backup methods, reports, and translations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 00:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190048.m1J0m6lr008750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 ugo.viti at initzero.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 02:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190245.m1J2jVIS031033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 21:45 EST ------- Thanks Kevin and specially to Jason for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:11:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190311.m1J3BoZc028155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:11 EST ------- glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190311.m1J3BrjG028193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:13:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190313.m1J3Dau6004310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:13 EST ------- unixcw-2.3-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190313.m1J3DdFp004354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.3-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3ESEa004584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.1-7.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3E10j028879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:14 EST ------- glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3E3T1028914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.1-1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3EPud029038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:14 EST ------- arpack-2.1-7.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:16:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190316.m1J3GDYt005726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:16 EST ------- aldo-0.7.5-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190318.m1J3Ibb0006255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:18 EST ------- fldigi-2.09-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3Evuv004793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:14 EST ------- libax25-0.0.11-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426868] Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190318.m1J3IL9l006158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-pdf - GLPI Plugin to print PDF of computers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426868 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:18 EST ------- glpi-pdf-0.4-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190314.m1J3Eqep004692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:14 EST ------- libax25-0.0.11-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:17:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190317.m1J3H0ur005868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:17 EST ------- arpack-2.1-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:18:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432921] Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190318.m1J3Ie24006302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fldigi - Digital modem program for Linux. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432921 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.09-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433081] Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190319.m1J3JNEp030374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unixcw - Shared library for Morse programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433081 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:19 EST ------- unixcw-2.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433165] Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190319.m1J3JvxU006558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aldo - A morse code tutor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433165 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:19 EST ------- aldo-0.7.5-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 03:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426567] Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190320.m1J3KhOU007235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-mass-ocs-import - GLPI Plugin for OCS Massive import https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426567 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-18 22:20 EST ------- glpi-mass-ocs-import-1.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 04:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190434.m1J4YdHa013380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 Bug 233975 depends on bug 214967, which changed state. Bug 214967 Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-18 23:34 EST ------- Well, arpack is done and in the repository now for rawhide, F7 and F8, so this can finally be built. Any chance of bumping to 2.23 in the process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 04:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190452.m1J4qxcV016855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: lpsolve - |Review Request: lpsolve - |OpenOffice.org 3.0 |OpenOffice.org 3.0 |dependency Linear |dependency Linear |Programming (MILP) solver |Programming (MILP) solver Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 04:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190451.m1J4pWFP016578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-18 23:51 EST ------- OK, the license is OK and the test suites are called: All 39 tests passed All 3 tests passed There's only one remaining issue that I can see. The -devel package now contains a static library, which is OK because this package doesn't build any dynamic libraries. However, in this case, you also need to have the -devel package provide nettle-static so that packages which will link against it can require the -static package and thus be easily tracked. Please see the "Packaging Static Libraries" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Since that's really just one line you need to add, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 04:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432971] Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190458.m1J4wtjq026133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-turboflot - A TurboGears widget for Flot, a jQuery plotting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432971 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2008-02-18 23:58 EST ------- Updates queued for F7/F8. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 05:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190509.m1J59YlH020049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-02-19 00:09 EST ------- thanks jason. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nettle Short Description: A low-level cryptographic library Owners: ianweller Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 05:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190518.m1J5IoJm021718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 00:18 EST ------- This builds cleanly and elicits only this from rpmlint: lpsolve-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is OK. Did you find somewhere any information on which versions of the LGPL are permitted? I couldn't find anything besides LGPL (and the standard GPL notice in the bison output, which doesn't matter). I believe that LGPLv2+ is acceptable in this situation, but it would be good to clarify this with the upstream developers if possible. The compiler is called with just "-O3" when it should be called with the full set of %{optflags}. This has the result of the debuginfo package being broken. It looks like the ccc script will need to be patched to set "opts" to something other than "-O3". Actually the whole build thing is a bit weird. Does the Makefile that's there not work? (It looks like it would still need patching anyway.) * source files match upstream: 842d6c0fb72c8912c8747f096d07c01c1ecab137b8e5b90e41f94ddf2e5cd543 lp_solve_5.5.0.11_source.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. X compiler flags are not the required set. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X debuginfo package is not complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: lpsolve-5.5.0.11-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm liblpsolve55.so()(64bit) lpsolve = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig lpsolve-devel-5.5.0.11-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm lpsolve-devel = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9 = lpsolve = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9 * a shared library is installed; ldconfig is called properly. There are no versioned .so files, so the unversioned one is properly in the main package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 05:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] New: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rolandd at cisco.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://digitalvampire.org/fedora/librdmacm.spec SRPM URL: http://digitalvampire.org/fedora/librdmacm-1.0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: librdmacm is a library that allows applications to set up reliable connected and unreliable datagram transfers when using RDMA adapters. It provides a transport-neutral interface in the sense that the same code can be used for both InfiniBand and iWARP adapters. The interface is based on sockets, but adapted for queue pair (QP) based semantics: communication must use a specific RDMA device, and data transfers are message-based. librdmacm only provides communication management (connection setup and tear-down) and works in conjunction with the verbs interface provided by libibverbs, which provides the interface used to actually transfer data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 06:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:08:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190608.m1J68hKI006567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 07:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190742.m1J7gFwm013554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-19 02:42 EST ------- I didn't have anything specific about the profile.d script in mind, just wanted to make sure not shipping it is intentional. If determining whether the system config is useful for running distcc is not expensive and can be done robustly, I think it could be nice to have. FWIW, icecream which is a similar package does ship such a script, see it and some related discussion in bug 402881 if you're interested. But anyway, I don't think lack of the profile.d snippet is a blocker. BTW, does a setup that has icecream and distcc installed (icecream automatically enabled, distcc automatically or manually) need some special considerations/configuration? It doesn't seem that there's a convenient way to opt out from using icecream if it's installed at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 07:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433422] New: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: athienem at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-IP-Country/perl-IP-Country.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/perl-IP-Country/perl-IP-Country-2.23-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: IP::Country allows fast lookups of IP addresses and their corresponding countries based on available regional NIC data. Although the country of assignment will probably be the country associated with a large ISP rather than the client herself, this is probably good enough for most log analysis applications, and under test has proved to be as accurate as reverse-DNS and WHOIS lookup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 08:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190805.m1J85Wqu017822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-19 03:05 EST ------- (this is an unofficial review) [+] spec file seems correct [+] rpmlint is silent [+] package build in mock [+] program works proprely [-] you should use %{?dist} in Release tag: Release: 1%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 08:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190818.m1J8IU2v019687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 guidolinfrancesco at email.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guidolinfrancesco at email.it ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-19 03:18 EST ------- I get some trouble with SELinux: SELinux denied access requested by /usr/sbin/logrotate. /var/lib/boinc/error.log may be a mislabeled. /var/lib/boinc/error.log default SELinux type is var_lib_t, while its current type is rpm_var_lib_t. SELinux denied access requested by /usr/sbin/logrotate. /var/lib/boinc/boinc.log may be a mislabeled. /var/lib/boinc/boinc.log default SELinux type is var_lib_t, while its current type is rpm_var_lib_t. This should fix the problem: restorecon /var/lib/boinc/error.log restorecon /var/lib/boinc/boinc.log These are the raw audit messages: avc: denied { getattr } for comm=logrotate dev=sda2 egid=0 euid=0 exe=/usr/sbin/logrotate exit=-13 fsgid=0 fsuid=0 gid=0 items=0 path=/var/lib/boinc/error.log pid=9513 scontext=system_u:system_r:logrotate_t:s0 sgid=0 subj=system_u:system_r:logrotate_t:s0 suid=0 tclass=file tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0 tty=(none) uid=0 avc: denied { getattr } for comm=logrotate dev=sda2 egid=0 euid=0 exe=/usr/sbin/logrotate exit=-13 fsgid=0 fsuid=0 gid=0 items=0 path=/var/lib/boinc/boinc.log pid=9513 scontext=system_u:system_r:logrotate_t:s0 sgid=0 subj=system_u:system_r:logrotate_t:s0 suid=0 tclass=file tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:rpm_var_lib_t:s0 tty=(none) uid=0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 08:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190824.m1J8OWHO028578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidf at sjsoft.com ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2008-02-19 03:24 EST ------- This spec file needs to be adjusted to reflect the 0.4.0-4 tarball versioning done by gimp-lqr-plugin. In addition it should include BuildRequires: lqr-1-devel Adjusted spec file at http://davidf.sjsoft.com/files/gimp-lqr-plugin.spec This builds installs and runs fine on my Fedora 8 i386 system. These improvements are from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428916 which is a duplicate package request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 08:26:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 03:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428916] Review Request: gimp-liquidrescale - Gimp plug-in for content-aware resizing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190826.m1J8Q4jH029229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-liquidrescale - Gimp plug-in for content-aware resizing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428916 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidf at sjsoft.com ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2008-02-19 03:26 EST ------- This is a duplicate of the package request in bug 314871. I've added some improvements from this spec file there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 09:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:06:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430070] Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190906.m1J96qcB028648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-rss - Evolution RSS Reader Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430070 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 09:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190938.m1J9cYrl001709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-02-19 04:38 EST ------- The updates at: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/lpsolve/lpsolve.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/lpsolve/lpsolve-5.5.0.11-2.fc9.src.rpm honour the optimization flags and I get debuginfo packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 09:40:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:40:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802190940.m1J9eGOo010640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora at normalesup.org 2008-02-19 04:40 EST ------- Actually, I think that the behavior of ccache is not right. There is a file in /etc/profile.d/ that modifies the environment of all users of the machine. For a single-user machine, that is find: the user is the one that installed the ccache package. For a machine with a lot of users, like a lab main server machine in a university, that is not really a good idea to push that feature to all users (even if a good administrator can see that file and empty it, as it is a %config file). I would have preferred a "opt-in" option instead of a "opt-out". I agree with Denis: pushing distcc the same way would not be a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 10:16:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191016.m1JAGXCD008439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-19 05:16 EST ------- If you don't even know what kernel resides in RHEL, why not simply trust me on that or investigate that the same firmware applies ... At any rate the compatibility bits do not hurt and people can only benefit from it. Please either pass this package or stop stalling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 10:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191046.m1JAkGQA021491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-19 05:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Sure, generally I like design proposed by Hans in comment #12. I like the idea > of two user groups design, one designed for embedding into other apps and > another patchset for music composers. Good. > I don't like timidity++.cfg creation in %post, where the configuration > would be dependent on random patchset state in /usr/share/soundfonts/. The new > soundfonts really should have virtual provides such as soundfont2 as proposed by > Hans. OKay, I agree that generating timidity++.cfg on the fly isn't pretty. An alternative would be to add virtual provides: soundfont2 to all soundfont packages. But make timidity++ explicitly Requires PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont, and point to that in timidity++.cfg. Advantages: -no ugly kludges to generate /etc/timidity++.cfg -a reasonable default, if we trust on virtual provides only, then the default will become the shortest package Downsides: -people who want to use another soundfont, must still have PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont installed because of the deps, taking up diskspace I think that given no a days large disks, the downside is survivable and this is a reasonable compromise. Agreed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:03:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] New: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/emacs-common-tuareg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/emacs-common-tuareg-1.45.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Emacs mode for editing ocaml Tuareg-mode is an add-on package for GNU Emacs for editing OCaml source files. It is much better than the default mode included in Emacs or the one provided by INRIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191104.m1JB45cD016293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433430 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433444] New: php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433444 Summary: php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vinctre at videotron.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: While trying to apply the latest php update on fedora 8 Missing Dependency: libphp5-5.2.4.so()(64bit) is needed by package raydium Missing Dependency: libphp5-5.2.4.so()(64bit) is needed by package maniadrive Missing Dependency: libphp5-5.2.4.so()(64bit) is needed by package maniadrive-track-editor I think it might be usefull for them to be linked directly to libphp5.so instead? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:27:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:27:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191127.m1JBRVlW028032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-02-19 06:27 EST ------- BTW the legal status of MLDonkey is stil questionable - I asked Tom Callaway some time ago and he didn't provides clean answer whether we may distribute p2p-software such as MLDonkey, aMule etc. We already have almost finished package at Livna's bugzilla: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487 but its obvious that shipping MLDonkey in main Fedora repo will be preferred. The only thing is left is to fix config-files so we could simply use generic make install instead of manually copying files with install tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191150.m1JBodLc031576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-19 06:50 EST ------- The legal status of the software itself or the legal status of distributing p2p software? There can't be a problem distributing p2p software generically because otherwise Fedora wouldn't come with useful tools such as bittorrent, wget, scp, or cp. I don't see an issue with the license of mldonkey itself. If you want the work done to be part of Fedora, you'll need to post candidate spec and SRPM URLs to this bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 11:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191156.m1JBuIeg024458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 ------- Additional Comments From ugo.viti at initzero.it 2008-02-19 06:56 EST ------- Hi, thanks for the reply... Fixed the spec file and released build 2: Spec URL: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/synbak/download/synbak.spec SRPM URL: http://www.initzero.it/products/opensource/synbak/download/synbak-1.2.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Best Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:19:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:19:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191219.m1JCJBrk028408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-19 07:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #65) > Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift.spec > SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift/vdrift-20071226-3.src.rpm > > All addressed. Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:32:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:32:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191232.m1JCW9po006226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-02-19 07:32 EST ------- in Livna, see http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1836 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191235.m1JCZ28M006818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-19 07:35 EST ------- Oops. Spec URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift-data/vdrift-data.spec SRPM URL: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/vdrift-data/vdrift-data-20071226-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:35:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191235.m1JCZPeD006889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-19 07:35 EST ------- Thanks! Want to do the -data too? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdrift Short Description: VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation Owners: limb Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:42:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191242.m1JCgMas000351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-19 07:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) > Thanks! > > Want to do the -data too? :) > Already on it, almost finished :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 12:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191244.m1JCif58008228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-19 07:44 EST ------- Full review done: MUST FIX -------- * Make Source0 an url (default sf.net download url please) * Change license to GPL+ Should FIX ---------- * Don't use mv in %install instead use "cp -a", mv destroys your builddir, making short-circuit builds fail, not that I know why anyone would want to do a short-circuit build in this case. I trust you to fix the 2 trivial must fix items before import, so: APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 13:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191301.m1JD1CGu004304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-19 08:01 EST ------- Resolved. Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdrift-data Short Description: VDrift data set Owners: limb Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 14:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191404.m1JE4H8P023429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-19 09:04 EST ------- @Patrice Dumas Are we expecting a the new elektra 7 for F-9, there is a rebuilt failure that we need to fix for gcc43 I may use oyranos 1.8 depending if oyranos is rebased on elektra 7 or current 6.10. Kai-Uwe any tips for this question ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 14:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191415.m1JEFNN6018070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-19 09:15 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295284) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295284&action=view) Ulrich's mail about license of PPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 14:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191424.m1JEOo0H027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-19 09:24 EST ------- Done, spec file updated. I've rolled-out a new .tar source package without affected content. http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/openuniverse/openuniverse-1.0-1.beta3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 14:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191442.m1JEgPhh022522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-19 09:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > If you don't even know what kernel resides in RHEL, why not simply trust me on > that or investigate that the same firmware applies ... Because a review isn't a matter of blind trust but questions/answears. Questions are here, answears not. > At any rate the compatibility bits do not hurt and people can only benefit from > it. Please either pass this package or stop stalling. > Well the review have been approved here: #346171 is now imported into cvs and will hit stable on next push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 14:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421231] Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191459.m1JEx9pN001040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421231 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-02-19 09:59 EST ------- built/included in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:03:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191503.m1JF3f17002498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-19 10:03 EST ------- 15:24:41 spot marek: if you want to keep the icons, you need to get explicit approval from each trademark holder to redistribute the icon under the GFDL. 15:25:20 spot marek: and honestly, I'm not sure that Fedora would permit that. 15:25:34 spot (since the Fedora logo is one of the icons) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433094] Review Request: watsup - System monitor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191509.m1JF9q2K003765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: watsup - System monitor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433094 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-19 10:09 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:05:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191505.m1JF5TWx003285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-19 10:05 EST ------- Indeed I am more or less waiting for 0.7., even a release candidate since I remember a post on the mailing list showing good progress, but I cannot find one. I am not too concerned with the failing rebuild, I would prefer not to spend time on the older release. But if needed I'll do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433033] Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191509.m1JF9CBW027911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433033 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-19 10:09 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433095] Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191509.m1JF95jI027874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galaxy - Stellar simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433095 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-19 10:09 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433029] Review Request: fotox - Image processing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191508.m1JF8unm027829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433029 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-19 10:08 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191514.m1JFEGtr004686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-19 10:14 EST ------- Spec file updated, removed icons, http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-bookmarks/astronomy-bookmarks-1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191511.m1JFBI7d004443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-19 10:11 EST ------- Of course I'll inform upstream. And what are we missing now to pass the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433033] Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191520.m1JFKIH0030122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: picpuz - Jigsaw puzzle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433033 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-19 10:20 EST ------- What do you exactly mean? Do you mean that your package is waiting for a reviewer and that it doesn't seems to be enough interest in it? You can be true, but some review have waited months to have somebody take it and have been reviewed then. 4 days is rather short in fedora standards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:36:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191536.m1JFaxqJ000927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-19 10:36 EST ------- Bug #346171 is a rogue takeover. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191546.m1JFkrmU003031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 torstentrautwein at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433477] New: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: torstentrautwein at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake.spec SRPM URL: http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake-0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Guake is a drop-down terminal for Gnome Desktop Environment, so you just need to press a key to invoke him, and press again to hide. Note: This is my first package, so I'm seeking a sponsor. Thanks. rpmlint: guake.src:11: W: buildprereq-use python-devel, glib2-devel >= 2.0, libX11-devel, notify-python guake.src: W: strange-permission guake-0.1.tar.gz 0744 guake.src: W: strange-permission guake.spec 0744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 15:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191550.m1JFoYeC004097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 10:50 EST ------- I find no other problems. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:32:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191632.m1JGWuvg012114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433488] New: Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433488 Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/dayplanner/dayplanner.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/dayplanner/dayplanner-0.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Day Planner is a simple time management program. Day Planner is designed to help you easily manage your time. It can manage appointments, birthdays and more. It makes sure you remember your appointments by popping up a dialog box reminding you about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432607] Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191630.m1JGUmvh020813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432607 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226110] Merge Review: lucene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191634.m1JGYVtD021286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lucene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226110 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191638.m1JGcpKL013201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |228141 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:41:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191641.m1JGfC3K013851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ville.skytta at iki.fi | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-19 11:41 EST ------- I disagree wrt ccache; it works out of the box, is different, has been set up automatically that way for several years and nobody has complained, and it provides an easy way for per-user opt-out (see comments in /etc/profile.d/ccache.*sh) and I strongly believe that auto-enabling it w/opt-out is the best way to package it. But anyway, this review is not about ccache, I realize that distcc is different, and I don't use or plan to use distcc but am just providing a few comments because I was asked to, so please feel free to proceed with the review the way you see fit. (And BTW, no need for personal Cc, I read the reviews mailing list.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:44:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433444] php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191644.m1JGiuvN014236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: php update create a dependancie issue with raydium & maniadrive https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433444 notting at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jorton at redhat.com Component|Package Review |php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432239] Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191647.m1JGlsW9023867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: electronics-menu - Electronics Menu for the Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432239 cgoorah at yahoo.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-1 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 16:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191655.m1JGtntR016826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 11:55 EST ------- opengrok-0.5-4.c4dea0135445 http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/opengrok/ ant-tools - lucene-core 2.2.0 - lucene-spellchecker 2.2.0 swing-layout 0.9 Needs newer lucene (bug #228141). Grab it from [1] if it builds or (gjc-less noarch from here [2]). [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=442802 [2] http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/lucene/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191721.m1JHLdMt031455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-19 12:21 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:22:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191722.m1JHMpr4031621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 12:22 EST ------- Looks good to me; the properl compiler flags are used and the debuginfo . I've no clue how to test this, but I can run the included binary and get help output so it at least does something. One thing I noticed while looking closer at the source tree: There are some files in bfp/bfl_LUSOL/LUSOL which look to be documentation, and one license statement which I guess should be packaged. It looks like a separate project has been inforporated. Judging from the documentation there, it seems that it is intended for it to have a separate release at some point but I couldn't find one. There are also some txt files there which mean nothing to me, and two which have the same content for some reason. So LUSOL_LGPL.txt needs to be packaged, and LUSOL-overview.txt and LUSOL_README.txt should probably be packaged as well. Just let me know if you agree and I'll approve this; there's no need for you to post a new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191723.m1JHNNAm022824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-19 12:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191727.m1JHRQjX023789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-19 12:27 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:25:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191725.m1JHPtIa023577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-19 12:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191729.m1JHTutj000412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-19 12:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191737.m1JHbb0o025697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-02-19 12:37 EST ------- That's fine by me. I'll freely admit I'm vague on what the damn thing even does :-) but I'd rather have it in place so than when OOo 3.0 arrives for F10 we don't have a internally bundled copy of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191741.m1JHfOGO026544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 12:41 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191740.m1JHeWNj026462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431335] Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191738.m1JHc7Oe025786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: decibel-audio-player - Music player for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431335 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-19 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > However, it must install to %{python_sitelib} as per > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > At the moment it's /usr/share/decibel-audio-player Those Python files are only meant to be used by Decibel, and not any other program. Only system-wide files (or modules) should go in %{python_sitelib}, isn't it? > Speaking of decibel-audio-player, why patch the .desktop to be Decibel Music > Player? To ensure consistency in the desktop menus. We have "Banshee Music Player", "Exaile Music Player", etc.. So the trend seems to be " Music Player" for such applications. What do you suggest? > Why not use the default BuildRoot of > %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ? That used to be the default BuildRoot. Not anymore. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:40:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] New: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.noarch/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0-1jpp.noarch/ Description: Natural layout for Swing panels Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: * Ability to get the baseline for components. * Ability to get the preferred gap between components. A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. Note: This is a raw import from JPackage 1.6 and thus most likely not yet complete. This reports exists to keep track of the packaging progress and to simplify cooperation on packaging. Comments from experienced Java packagers are very welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191740.m1JHew8I002730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels [NEEDS WORK] Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 12:40 EST ------- swing-layout.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: swing-layout.noarch: E: description-line-too-long A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. swing-layout.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java swing-layout.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:0.9-1jpp 0:1.0-1jpp swing-layout.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout.noarch: W: empty-%pre swing-layout.noarch: W: empty-%postun swing-layout.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 48) swing-layout.src: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. This project has an eye towards the needs of GUI builders, such as NetBeans. This project consists of the following pieces: swing-layout.src: E: description-line-too-long A new LayoutManager that utilizes both of these concepts and is tuned toward a free-form drag and drop layout model as can be provided by GUI builders. swing-layout.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java swing-layout.src: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout.src: W: strange-permission swing-layout-1.0-src.zip 0600 swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Swing Layout Extensions goal is to make it easy to create professional cross platform layouts with Swing. swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln swing-layout-javadoc.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191744.m1JHiRSg026915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 12:44 EST ------- Great; APPROVED. Just package up that license file and whichever of the other docs you think are useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 17:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191748.m1JHmKMN004044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 12:48 EST ------- Huzaifa: I forgot to request creation of the ACLs for you. Now your action is needed to create them -- Please add yourself here[ [1] and check all ACLs. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/sunbird Importing to CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191803.m1JI3Bw9007202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:10:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386531] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191810.m1JIApwN008786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386531 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(marcus at shortymail.| |net) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:10:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386531] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191810.m1JIAZ4Z008674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386531 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-19 13:10 EST ------- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug a duplicate of the new bug. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191826.m1JIQd0o012426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 13:26 EST ------- Builds OK for me; I suggest you ping the xemacs maintainer to get some assistance with the xemacs bits. Why do you redefine %debug_package? This is a noarch package and so doesn't have a debug package in any case. I really don't see the point in having a separate doc directory with the same COPYING file in every subpackage; it really isn't necessary. So far we're not blocking on it, but I have to say I really don't understand why you would do that. Currently all of the xemacs stuff is cruft since it's not being built, but I see no problem in leaving it there in the hope that it can be made to work. However, if it's not ever going to be built then you get to drop the -common package (and really the package should then be called just "emacs-tuareg"). You might want to consider dropping something into emacs-startdir so that this package will work without additional configuration. I think you can just put append-tuareg.el there, although I don't know quite enough about emacs to say that with certainty. The only thing I see that needs changing is the debug_package thing, which is really minor so I'll go ahead and approve this and you can remove it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 2f22834259a6b0c065a6528a519eda3d0164a9bf2de8a5f7c041d6a91777261b tuareg-mode-1.45.6.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * package conforms to emacs packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: emacs-common-tuareg-1.45.6-1.fc9.noarch.rpm emacs-common-tuareg = 1.45.6-1.fc9 = emacs-tuareg-1.45.6-1.fc9.noarch.rpm emacs-tuareg = 1.45.6-1.fc9 = emacs(bin) >= 22.1.50 emacs-common-tuareg = 1.45.6-1.fc9 emacs-tuareg-el-1.45.6-1.fc9.noarch.rpm emacs-tuareg-el = 1.45.6-1.fc9 = emacs-tuareg = 1.45.6-1.fc9 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED, just remove the debug_package define when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:37:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191837.m1JIbehn014616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 13:37 EST ------- The copyrights for the databases look rather non-free to me; see http://search.cpan.org/dist/IP-Country/lib/IP/Country.pm. I don't actually see the databases included in the package, but the manpage says "derived from" and I'm not enough of a lawyer to tell if the package is actually free of those copyrights. Has this package been looked over and been declared OK? If not, perhaps this should block FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191840.m1JIewAE006189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-19 13:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, as this bug blocks speech-dispatcher (bug 432259) I want > to approve this package soon, however it seems not a few issues > needs fixing. > > For general packaging guidelines you can refer to the following pages. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > For this package it seems to be a package for libraries so it would > be good for you that you install rpmdevtools rpm and try: > $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib dotconf > to get a skeleton spec file for dotconf. Spec URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-1.0.13- 1.fc7.src.rpm I have replaced both the SPEC and SRPM file on the server by the one made using skeleton spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 18:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191858.m1JIwlMO018499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 13:58 EST ------- This fails to build for me: checking for ibv_get_device_list in -libverbs... no configure: error: ibv_get_device_list() not found. librdmacm requires libibverbs. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.55809 (%build) I added a build dependency on libibverbs-devel and it built OK with no complaints from rpmlint. Full review forthcoming... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191906.m1JJ6KQQ011422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 14:06 EST ------- Any chance that this will be closed any time soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191906.m1JJ6oCb020491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 14:06 EST ------- Is there any reason this can't be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191908.m1JJ8KjY020673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 14:08 EST ------- Any reason this can't be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428579] Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191909.m1JJ9qee011903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428579 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191914.m1JJEnhW021743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-19 14:14 EST ------- Doesn't comment 7 answer your question? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191922.m1JJMXHH014772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-19 14:22 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-common-tuareg Short Description: Emacs mode for editing ocaml Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191920.m1JJKLQs023195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-19 14:20 EST ------- Thank you for quickly approving this. debug_package: Force of habit .. I'll remove it. xemacs: I've asked the upstream maintainer (of tuareg, not xemacs) if he knows what is going on. No reply yet. I'll request CVS, remove debug_package, temporarily restructure without xemacs as you suggest, and hopefully upstream will get back to me about xemacs support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:47:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191947.m1JJlcOv019361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 14:47 EST ------- It does not, because I have no idea when those Obsoletes and Provides will be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191959.m1JJxhr4030260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-19 14:59 EST ------- Ok, I understand now. Jindrich? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191958.m1JJw6cx030124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-02-19 14:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lpsolve Short Description: Linear Programming (MILP) solver Owners: caolanm@ Branches: devel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 19:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802191959.m1JJx6QT021422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 guidolinfrancesco at email.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guidolinfrancesco at email.it ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-19 14:59 EST ------- Hi, this is an unofficial review. There are some things that need to be fixed: [-] You should use %{dist} in the release tag: Release: 1%{dist} [-] You should use %{?_smp_mflags} in the make command: make %{?_smp_mflags} this enable parallel build on multicore CPU. [-] Use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc: %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/guake.schemas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 20:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 321411] Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192017.m1JKHWAo002042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ski - IA-64 user and system mode simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321411 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-19 15:17 EST ------- * Tue Feb 19 2008 Dan Horak 1.3.2-1 - update to version 1.3.2 - remove patches integrated into upstream codebase - create a lib subpackage to be multi-lib aware Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/ski-1.3.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 20:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192032.m1JKWCg2028156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 alex at tvtransilvania.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(alex at tvtransilvani| |a.ro) | ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-19 15:32 EST ------- New packages with all the issues fixed(hopefully). Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/gimp-lqr-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/gimp-lqr-plugin-0.4.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 20:30:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192030.m1JKUN68004937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-19 15:30 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1-0.1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 20:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192055.m1JKtWZ8000322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2008-02-19 15:55 EST ------- Even with BuildRequires on NetworkManager-devel it fails on development. Evidently it's not ported to latest NM as of revision 390. Build error: network-status-agent.c: In function 'init_nm_connection': network-status-agent.c:157: error: 'NM_DBUS_SIGNAL_STATE_CHANGE' undeclared (fir st use in this function) network-status-agent.c:157: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once network-status-agent.c:157: error: for each function it appears in.) network-status-agent.c: In function 'nm_get_device_info': network-status-agent.c:251: error: 'NM_DBUS_INTERFACE_DEVICES' undeclared (first use in this function) make[2]: *** [network-status-agent.o] Error 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 21:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192109.m1JL9xwi012388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 skvidal at linux.duke.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skvidal at linux.duke.edu ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-02-19 16:09 EST ------- NOTE: I AM NOT SPEAKING FOR THE BOARD I AM ONLY SPEAKING FOR ME. Nicolas: you're not being cool. Don't play this game on a single package Axel: Don't talk down to Nicolas - or at least that's how I'm perceiving it. Answer the questions he has. Seriously, play nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 21:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192155.m1JLtJn3022001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 ------- Additional Comments From torstentrautwein at gmail.com 2008-02-19 16:55 EST ------- Guidolin, thanks for your review. As this is my first rpm package, I really appreciate any feedback. I fixed the the mistakes you mentioned. The new version is available here: http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake.spec http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake-0.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm http://www.neowork.de/guake/guake-debuginfo-0.1-1.fc8.i386.rpm Thanks, Torsten -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 22:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192240.m1JMeeGG031016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2008-02-19 17:40 EST ------- The database copyright is not exactly free. But that should not be a problem for fedora as the databases are not shipped. The package does contain the scripts to generate a local cached copy of the database dump though. These scripts are packaged as docs in the utils subpackage. I do not consider this a FE-LEGAL blocker though. Would you agree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 22:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433547] New: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nagios-nsca.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/nagios-nsca-2.7.2-3.src.rpm Description: NSCA is a daemon that lives on the nagios server and receives passive check results over the network. It supports encrypted communications between the nsca client and nsca server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 22:45:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192245.m1JMjOtF022451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 ------- Additional Comments From athienem at redhat.com 2008-02-19 17:45 EST ------- On a closer look, the *.gif files are no images as I first assumed but are the data files... I guess the better solution would be to drop these and just package a script generating these from the source... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 23:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192311.m1JNBZnD027025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: swing-layout|Review Request: swing-layout |- Natural layout for Swing |- Natural layout for Swing |panels [NEEDS WORK] |panels ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-19 18:11 EST ------- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/swing-layout.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.noarch/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/swing-layout-1.0.3-1.noarch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 19 23:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802192346.m1JNkUbm032378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-19 18:46 EST ------- Ville, sorry about the CC. I guess the whole opt-in/opt-out comes down to personal preference. I personally like the way ccache is packaged. I actually discovered it was enabled on my system by accident, when I couldn't understand why my rebuilds were so fast :-) I like the fact that it's plug-and-play. Anyways, distcc is different and I think I'll stick to the opt-in strategy for now, so let's close this particular discussion :-) I'll investigate the icecream/distcc combination shortly, thanks for pointing that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 00:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433422] Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200038.m1K0cNDn008757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IP-Country - Fast lookup of country codes from IP addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433422 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 19:38 EST ------- I was wondering what .gif files were doing in a perl module. But if you remove them, what use is the module? We do have other packages which will download data which is not free enough for us to distribute, but that data is still free to use, whereas this data is not even free to use in all circumstances. So, yeah, I do think input is needed, either from legal or from one of the various committees. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 00:56:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] New: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource- CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: me at bradmwalker.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.bradmwalker.com/SPECS/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.bradmwalker.com/SRPMS/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV-0.1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a DataSource driver for Structures_DataGrid using CSV files. I use it in projects to parse CSV files with an OOP interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200101.m1K11B8C012806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 me at bradmwalker.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200100.m1K10H6n012622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 me at bradmwalker.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200103.m1K13jBp022868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 me at bradmwalker.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:16:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433571] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200116.m1K1Gk4Z015656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433571 me at bradmwalker.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433571] New: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433571 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer- CSV - Renders CSV strings/files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: me at bradmwalker.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.bradmwalker.com/SPECS/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.bradmwalker.com/SRPMS/php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV-0.1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a Renderer driver for Structures_DataGrid that generates a CSV string. A much better interface for generating CSV files than using fputcsv(). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 01:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200158.m1K1wVSW031551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-02-19 20:58 EST ------- Was the release note done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 02:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200232.m1K2WsMt027900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 fedora at christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200302.m1K32Lh6009792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:02 EST ------- ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:07:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200307.m1K37ZW3001564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:07 EST ------- colrdx-1.02-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:03:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200303.m1K33gPV000777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:03 EST ------- ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200309.m1K39SQP010928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:09 EST ------- demorse-0.8-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200308.m1K38E0Z010858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:08 EST ------- colrdx-1.02-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:06:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200306.m1K36AEa010621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:06 EST ------- ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:05:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200305.m1K35SD8010439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:05 EST ------- ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:11:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200311.m1K3BofZ011815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:11 EST ------- gpsk31-0.3-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:10:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200310.m1K3A014011056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:09 EST ------- demorse-0.8-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200311.m1K3B7K2011718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:11 EST ------- gpsk31-0.3-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200334.m1K3YOOj015258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200336.m1K3agsf006603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200335.m1K3ZGvB006421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200337.m1K3bs9P015980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200339.m1K3dMx9006897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:44:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200344.m1K3iHJY017009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:44 EST ------- nettle-1.15-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200342.m1K3gLG7016819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-19 22:42 EST ------- nettle-1.15-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 03:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200346.m1K3kBbk017609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at christoph-wickert.de 2008-02-19 22:46 EST ------- FAIL: rpmlint $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64/result/squeeze-* squeeze.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/squeeze-0.2.2/TODO squeeze.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/squeeze ['/usr/lib64'] Not sure if the rpath also appears on i386, cannot test atm. Do you see the same or is it just me? OK - MUST: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: Spec file name matches base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: The package is licensed GPLv2+ and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: License from source is included in %doc. OK - MUST: Spec is written in American English. OK - MUST: Spec file is legible. OK - MUST: Sources matches upstream by md5 36b326e1ff4592ef4bffd2b75e171ead OK - MUST: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: no known exclude archs FAIL - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but libxfce4util should be libxfce4util-devel. Will be installed anyway by Thunar-devel -> exo-devel -> libxfce4util-devel OK - MUST: Spec file handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: ldconfig correctly called in %post and %postun for libsqueeze OK - MUST: Package is not relocatable OK - MUST: Package owns all directories that it creates (none) OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are be set properly, valid %defattr OK - MUST: Valid %clean section present OK - MUST: Use of macros is consistent as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Package contains code, no content. OK - MUST: No large documentation OK - MUST: docs don't affect the runtime of the app OK - MUST: Headers are in -devel package. OK - MUST: No static libraries OK - MUST: -devel package correctly requires pkgconfig OK - MUST: libsqueeze*.so is in -devel package OK - MUST: -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: Package does not contain libtool archives OK - MUST: Includes a %{name}.desktop file, that is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT called at beginning of %install. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock FAIL - SHOULD: package does not function as described. I see excessive CPU usage when adding files to archives. Even a small text file in a new archive nearly freezes my computer. OK - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane. Hints: You could change %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/squeeze.png %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/squeeze.png to %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/squeeze.png maybe the decide to include more sizes later also you could configure with --disable-static instead of removing the *.a file I see three blockers, the rest is ok. I don't care about the TODO. Does squeeze need additional programs (gzip, tar, unzip, zip) or is everything performed through libsqueeze? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 04:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200428.m1K4SVYO024616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 ------- Additional Comments From rolandd at cisco.com 2008-02-19 23:28 EST ------- oops, sorry about that... I've only tested on my development systems, which all have libibverbs-devel. I've added BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel >= 1.1-1 to my spec file, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 04:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433029] Review Request: fotox - Image processing program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200443.m1K4hvps027285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fotox - Image processing program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433029 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 04:52:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:52:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200452.m1K4qP5q019043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 05:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200541.m1K5fcZu027323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 00:41 EST ------- Still gimp-lqr-plugin is GPLv2 strict and liblqr-1 (bug 429202) is GPLv3. Note that we are not judging the license issues by the license tags in the spec files, but by actually checking the source tarballs. Would you ask the upstream to actually release the new version of gimp-lqr-plugin tarball to fix the license conflict from liblqr-1? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 05:48:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200548.m1K5mrtS028518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 00:48 EST ------- By the way the reason we are saying that gimp-lqr-plugin is actually licensed under strict GPLv2 is that the source codes under src directory actually says they are licensed under GPLv2 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 06:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200656.m1K6u0VH019310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 01:55 EST ------- Well, would you again try to follow lib skeleton spec file again? - The ELF shared library (usually libXXXX.so.X.X) and its ldconfig symlink (usually libXXXXX.so.X) must not be in -devel subpackage. Only the symlink used for linkage (libXXXX.so) should be in -devel subpackage. - pkgconfig .pc file should not be deleted and should be included in -devel subpackage. Then -devel subpackage should have "Requires: pkgconfig" (please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) Also: - Please make Summary a bit more verbose. the summary "dot.conf" is not useful. - I recommend to use %{name} and %{version} in Source0 URL. In this way you don't have to modify Source0 when the version of the tarball is upgraded. - I recommend to use ------------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for recent autotool-based Makefiles. - The file "INSTALL" is usually for people who want to compile and install the package by themselves and is not needed for people who use rpm. - For directory ownership issue of %{_datadir}/aclocal and for usability, I recommend to add "Requires: automake" to -devel subpackage (not BuildRequires). - For %{_bindir}/dotconf-config (in the source tarball it was dotconf-config.in), @libdir@ is expanded as /usr/lib on 32bits machine but /usr/lib64 on 64bits machine on Fedora. This means that /usr/bin/dotconf-config differs between on 32 bits machine and on 64 bits machine. Currently Fedora does not allow this type of multilib conflicts for -devel subpackage. You can use "rpmlint" (in rpmlint rpm) to detect some generic issues on your rpms. For example of a library rpm, you can check: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/oniguruma/oniguruma.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 07:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200725.m1K7PKnq025553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 07:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200735.m1K7ZZfO017160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 02:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295402) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295402&action=view) Patch to remove ASL 1.1 part for GPLv2+ compatibility By the way: - speech-dispatcher (bug 432259), which depends on this bug, is licensed under GPLv2+. So to make use of speech-dispatcher the license of dotconf must be GPLv2+ compatible. - However currently this package (dotconf) is licensed under LGPLv2 and ASL 1.1 as build log shows: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13/libpool -Wall -g -o libdotconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 10:4:10 -release 1.0 -export-dynamic dotconf.lo readdir.lo --------------------------------------------------------------------------- and src/readdir.c is ASL 1.1 Note that ASL 1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible, so this situation is not allowed. Fortunately for Linux as far as I checked the source code we can built this package without src/readdir.{c,h}. The attached file makes this package surely LGPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 08:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200822.m1K8Mq59003714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-02-20 03:22 EST ------- I've committed elfutils.spec updates to devel/ CVS, though there won't be a new build til the next elfutils release in a week or two. Please eyeball the spec changes. The %doc files don't really have to be copied into each subpackage, do they? They are in elfutils. I added versions to the obsoletes for the RHL8.0 version that was obsoleted in RH8.0.1 by elfutils-libelf. I added a Provides: libelf-devel to elfutils-libelf-devel. libelf is a pure DSO package, so an explicit provide does not make sense. (These obsoletes/provides are so old we might just punt them--we don't support upgrade paths from RHL8 anyway.) rpmlint is not clever enough to see that elfutils-libelf-devel depends on elfutils-libelf-%{_arch} because a plain elfutils-libelf dependency is not really sufficient for biarch machines. I think I fixed all the cosmetic items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 08:26:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200826.m1K8Q236026402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 ------- Additional Comments From pauln at truemesh.com 2008-02-20 03:26 EST ------- Checksum of source does not match Source0 from url. lftpget http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/gem2rpm-0.5.2.gem [pnasrat at fedora-8-vm SPECS]$ sha1sum gem2rpm-0.5.2.gem ../SOURCES/gem2rpm-0.5.2.gem 1d6194dc1e46fc2ff37f6c8aac068ab7302b3345 gem2rpm-0.5.2.gem cc6ae4ac42dc49d515626916e7c51168c343da8d ../SOURCES/gem2rpm-0.5.2.gem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 08:33:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:33:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200833.m1K8X8ow005299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 ------- Additional Comments From pauln at truemesh.com 2008-02-20 03:33 EST ------- The rubygem-gem2spec.spec in data.tar.gz differs as it is the spec for the package and has the fixes, I guess you either need to release a point version or do 0.5.3 with the packaging fixes, or use the original rubyforge gem and not generated gem from svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 08:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200838.m1K8cLkA006183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 03:38 EST ------- Rawhide is broken at the moment. [+] source files match upstream a3fac860aad241da9bc21b5a37f6c8cb [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] BSD license is open source-compatible. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in mock (dist-f8, rawhide is broken). [+] package installs properly [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 08:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200838.m1K8cnuE028360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-20 03:38 EST ------- some notes - the log4net.pc file should be installed into %{_libdir}/pkgconfig (other .NET devel packages are installing the *.pc files there) - the %{_libdir}/mono/gac directory is owned by mono-core, so you should package only the %{_libdir}/mono/gac/log4net subdirectory - you must also set ExcludeArch: ppc64 as Mono doesn't exist there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200914.m1K9ETkV013512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-20 04:14 EST ------- The problem is that these questions are just for stalling. For example in comment #20 the reviewer already showed that he knows which kernels are in RHEL5 for example and now pretends that he doesn't and wants to spin the discussion into something else. FWIW the kernels in RHEL3-5 are based on 2.4.21/2.6.9/2.6.18, but the version of the base kernel does not say much about what capabilities the kernels have as especially RHEL3/4 kernels are heavily patched compared to upstream. Well, that technically answers the last question the reviewer posed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200916.m1K9GOss014295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 04:16 EST ------- mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-5.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch/ SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-5.c4dea0135445.fc8.noarch/opengrok-0.5-5.c4dea0135445.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec - ant-tools - swing-layout 0.9 TODO: * Package war (how to do so? Is the way subversion does that sane? Not.) * .desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200923.m1K9N1EZ005079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 ------- Additional Comments From nicubunu at gmail.com 2008-02-20 04:23 EST ------- As I said above, the Open Clip Art Library is not expected to make another release in the foreseeable future. The solution I found to provide recent images (those from the new site) is to set up a script (run daily from cron) providing a snapshot of the existing clipart: http://download.openclipart.org/downloads/daily_SVG_snapshot.tar.bz2 Notes: - large size ~156MB, contains over 8000 SVG and SVGZ files, is updated daily; - unlike the 0.18 release, it does not have a directory structure for categories, the only structure is based on author name (and I don't know a better solution, the website uses a database for tags/keywords); - for now the large majority of those images are new, not found in the previous release but over time (at a very slow rate, the operation is done manually) the images from release 0.18 will be merged here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:21:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426452] gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200921.m1K9LqF9015659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426452 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-20 04:21 EST ------- Many builds succeeded in Koji. Shouldn't this be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200942.m1K9guxg019263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433602 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 09:44:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432965] Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802200944.m1K9ipWj008801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openclipart - Open Clip Art Library Alias: openclipart-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432965 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 04:44 EST ------- Nicu continuing discussion here: bug #433602 Closing this as package is in CVS and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 10:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432033] Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201038.m1KAc5lm029277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-20 05:38 EST ------- Imported, build and Fedora 8 update requested in bodhi, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 10:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201038.m1KAc6gq029297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 Bug 432034 depends on bug 432033, which changed state. Bug 432033 Summary: Review Request: crystalspace - Crystal Space a free 3D engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432033 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:17:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201117.m1KBHHA1025967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-20 06:17 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/gimp-lqr-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/gimp-lqr-plugin-0.4.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201137.m1KBbvmX007132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-20 06:37 EST ------- fwiw, I was also working on nsca lately. I uploaded my package and spec if you want to take a look (this is still a work in progress) : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/nsca.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/nsca-2.7.2-2.fc8.src.rpm I did not had time to look closely at your package but I will as soon as I have a bit of time. Regards, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201145.m1KBjgun031120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 06:45 EST ------- This is a blocker for my package and the Fedora maintainer seems not to be interested. cvsextras commits will be open and I'm willing aprove the Fedora maintainer once he applies for ACLs. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-twisted-names New Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:45:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201145.m1KBjeS2031086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 06:45 EST ------- This is a blocker for my package and the Fedora maintainer seems not to be interested. cvsextras commits will be open and I'm willing aprove the Fedora maintainer once he applies for ACLs. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-twisted-web New Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201145.m1KBjjLG008686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 06:45 EST ------- This is a blocker for my package and the Fedora maintainer seems not to be interested. cvsextras commits will be open and I'm willing aprove the Fedora maintainer once he applies for ACLs. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-twisted-core New Branches: EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 11:53:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201153.m1KBr7N5032243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-20 06:53 EST ------- >From #20 >That been said, keeping compat location are fine for RHEL4 and RHEL5, (if this >make sense to have them, but i don't think so as your repository have 0.10.6 for >RHEL5 and 2.6.18 kernels)... Let me rephrase: EPEL may need packages to be functional by itself. ivtv-firmware is missing the needed kernel module. It is possible to use ivtv-kmdl from any third part repo to use ivtv-firmware. But using ivtv-firmware alone is pointless. At this time ivtv.ko hasn't been backported for last RHEL kernels AFAIK. Note that if it was done or requested this would make the compat-location pointless. I leave the decition about epel to another reviewer anyway... So to sum-up, if any of the people involved in the EPEL repository accept this package, i have nothing against preventing axel to own epel-4 and epel-5 branches. (just ask and i will request cvs for epel-4 and epel-5 once approved by someone else). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 12:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201214.m1KCEfE2003501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-20 07:14 EST ------- This has nothing to do with an EPEL branch, I submitted a Fedora package that is compatible to RHEL, and that's what I want to maintain - tthe whole idea was not to have to do split branches at all. You can't simply go around stealing other people's packages - you will have to step down from ownership if you want this to deescalate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 12:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201238.m1KCcAdM017970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-20 07:38 EST ------- Imported, fixed several BR issues, and now building it fails on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=449200&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 12:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201248.m1KCmdoI019758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwizart at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-20 07:48 EST ------- I can't review this package anymore as the submitter and I are in conflict. Reassigned to noby - Feel free to take it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 12:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201250.m1KCorOV010151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-20 07:50 EST ------- Fix the license tag on the subpackages, which still say GPL. Also, the -devel packages need to Require the main packages, both for elfutils and elfutils-libelf. As for the RH8 Obsoletes, I'd just as soon leave them there, but I'm OK with dropping them. Also, I see the fh.o URL, but I there's still no URL in the Source tag, and I can't find the tarball there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 13:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201319.m1KDJqTB025410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #295284|message/rfc822 |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 13:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201333.m1KDXVh0017513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 08:33 EST ------- Please make it sure that the directory %{_datadir}/gcx/ is owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 13:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201336.m1KDa4qU028739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 08:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astronomy-bookmarks Short Description: Fedora astronomy bookmarks Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 InitialCC: astronomy-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 13:51:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:51:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426452] gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201351.m1KDpeah020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426452 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 13:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201348.m1KDmNSL020122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 14:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:25:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427093] Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201425.m1KEPl5G005795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcx - Data-reduction tool for CCD photometry Alias: gcx-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427093 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 09:25 EST ------- Mamoru, done. Thank you all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201521.m1KFLvaH007655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-20 10:21 EST ------- Well, I will work on oyranos 1.7 (with elektra 6.10) and update to 1.8 (along with elektra 7. if possible). So to sum-up (and I will need a reviewer advice for this). Since some profiles may still problematic. I would rip off all icc profiles from oyranos and provides each profiles as a separate requirement for oyranos. I would package them as: color-icc-profiles-cineon GPL/BSD ? color-icc-profiles-lcmsLAB Public Domain color-icc-profiles-sRGB color-icc-profiles-PhotoGamutRGB (tell about Creatives Commons but not strong in deutch). colot-icc-profiles-LStarRGB (License need to be clarified but at least specifications are here for recreate them). Thoses profiles might be acceptables for Fedora. and as more profiles are present, they migh be added to a virtual provides,like color-icc-profiles-all I don't know if oyranos should Requires all profiles, but at least it can requires some, so it will work without complain at runtime. For the oyranos-monitor-nvidia: I will split off from the main package, and I will rename oyranos-monitor to oyranos-monitor-main, so when oyranos-monitor-nvidia will be installed, it will be used instead of the main oyranos-monitor (using alternatives). About oyranos_version.h, i will rip out OY_SRCDIR and OY_SRC_LOCALEDIR and keep the timestramps from a reference file. (I wonder if this file should be used anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201520.m1KFKN7Y017914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-20 10:20 EST ------- The problem is that the link command for vdrift gets passed: -Lbullet-2.64/out/linuxx86/optimize/libs instead of: -Lbullet-2.64/out/linuxppc/optimize/libs Various solutions: -patch configure (learn it about ppc64) (I guess) -sed the Makefile after %configure (on ppc64 only) -create a symlink (on ppc64 only) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:37:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] New: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manupulate matrix of Reals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manupulate matrix of Reals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Math-MatrixReal.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Implements the data type "matrix of reals", which can be used almost like any other basic Perl type thanks to OPERATOR OVERLOADING, i.e., $product = $matrix1 * $matrix2; does what you would like it to do (a matrix multiplication). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201544.m1KFi1AN022494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-Math- |Review Request: perl-Math- |MatrixReal - Manupulate |MatrixReal - Manipulate |matrix of Reals |matrix of Reals -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201547.m1KFl0LC013308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 10:47 EST ------- Okay, now gimp-lqr-plugin is under GPLv2+. Removing FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 15:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433477] Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201546.m1KFkGm2013204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: guake - Drop-down terminal for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433477 ------- Additional Comments From guidolinfrancesco at email.it 2008-02-20 10:46 EST ------- Ok, there are some other things: [-] The recommended value for the BuildRoot tag is: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 [-] Packages should not use the PreReq tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-c81b037a3a0d08f98eb9cb50594f5de73d1e461d [-] *.la file should be removed. Add: find %{buildroot} -name \*\.la -delete after make install and remove those file from the file list. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:03:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201603.m1KG32dG026225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-20 11:03 EST ------- I have updated the .spec and .src.rpm with the summary without typo. I didn't changed the release for this change. It will appear in 15-30 minutes at te same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] New: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmahut at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnuradio/gnuradio.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/gnuradio/gnuradio-3.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNU Radio is a collection of software that when combined with minimal hardware, allows the construction of radios where the actual waveforms transmitted and received are defined by software. What this means is that it turns the digital modulation schemes used in today's high performance wireless devices into software problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201610.m1KGA5qC027713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-20 11:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > So to sum-up (and I will need a reviewer advice for this). > Since some profiles may still problematic. I would rip off all icc profiles from > oyranos and provides each profiles as a separate requirement for oyranos. > > I would package them as: > color-icc-profiles-cineon GPL/BSD ? > color-icc-profiles-lcmsLAB Public Domain > color-icc-profiles-sRGB > color-icc-profiles-PhotoGamutRGB (tell about Creatives Commons but not strong in > deutch). > colot-icc-profiles-LStarRGB (License need to be clarified but at least > specifications are here for recreate them). Why don't you package the profiles that are acceptable in fedora in oyranos itself? Because they may be needed by other applications? Because they have separate upstreams? > Thoses profiles might be acceptables for Fedora. and as more profiles are > present, they migh be added to a virtual provides,like > color-icc-profiles-all > I don't know if oyranos should Requires all profiles, but at least it can > requires some, so it will work without complain at runtime. It should certainly requires all the profiles that can be shipped in fedora. > For the oyranos-monitor-nvidia: I will split off from the main package, and I > will rename oyranos-monitor to oyranos-monitor-main, so when > oyranos-monitor-nvidia will be installed, it will be used instead of the main > oyranos-monitor (using alternatives). That seems quite complicated. In any case a documentation, even minimal, of oyranos-monitor-nvidia and oyranos-monitor is missing. On the same subject, the oyranos-config-fltk man page should be in the main package. > About oyranos_version.h, i will rip out OY_SRCDIR and OY_SRC_LOCALEDIR and keep > the timestramps from a reference file. (I wonder if this file should be used > anyway). It is not clear, indeed. It is a bit dubious to have all these symbols defined in the API. The API should be platform independent and it is clearly not the case here. There should be no file name separator in the API, for example. There are 2 rpmlint warnings relevant for -devel: oyranos-devel.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/oyranos-devel-0.1.7/html/structoyComp__s____coll__graph.map This one is a bit strange, maybe doxygen is doing wrong things with maps since there is a reference in the html to oyComp__s____coll__map oyranos-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/oyranos-devel-0.1.7/ChangeLog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201615.m1KGF7LM018898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 11:15 EST ------- Does not build on ppc64 because sdcc package is not available for ppc64 arch yet (but it will be after Jesse's rebuild for gcc34). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Math-Symbolic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Math-Symbolic-0.510-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Math::Symbolic is intended to offer symbolic calculation capabilities to the Perl programmer without using external (and commercial) libraries and/or applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:19:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] New: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Algorithm-CurveFit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Algorithm::CurveFit implements a nonlinear least squares curve fitting algorithm. That means, it fits a curve of known form (sine-like, exponential, polynomial of degree n, etc.) to a given set of data points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201621.m1KGLmWO029899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Alias: boinc-client-request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |boinc-client-request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201635.m1KGZiDZ022681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Bug 433312 depends on bug 228141, which changed state. Bug 228141 Summary: Please update lucene to latest version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228141 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201640.m1KGei2w000951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-20 11:40 EST ------- Yes, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 16:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201651.m1KGpwFX003374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Alias: boinc-client-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|boinc-client-request |boinc-client-review ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 11:51 EST ------- Additional issues: -- rpmlint output - boinc-client.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/boinc-client-5.10.40/checkin_notes - boinc-client.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/boinc-client-5.10.40/checkin_notes_2006 \- no reason to have executable documentation :) - boinc-client.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/boinc-client-5.10.40/checkin_notes_2005 - boinc-client.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/boinc-client-5.10.40/checkin_notes_2004 \- these files are not in utf8, use iconv in the spec file to convert - boinc-client.i386: W: bogus-variable-use-in-%pre $RPM_BUILD_ROOT \- do not use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %pre environment - boinc-client.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client \- it's not recommenced to have service enabled by default, user should decide if he wants to enable it or not (imho) - boinc-client.i386: E: missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword Short-Description in /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client - boinc-client.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client - boinc-client.i386: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client - boinc-client.i386: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client \- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SysVInitScript draft only but it can help to resolve it -- sources contains .svn directories \- use svn export instead of svn checkout -- translations are a good idea, but it's more elegant to translate it via specspo once the spec file is imported \- http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/specspo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201714.m1KHEhtZ007799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 12:14 EST ------- [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [+] dist tag is present [+] build root is correct [+] license is open source-compatible [+] %clean is present [+] package builds in mock (dist-f8) [+] package installs properly [+] rpmlint is sane All others issue are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201718.m1KHI8IN030688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 12:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: swing-layout Short Description: Natural layout for Swing panels Owners: lkundrak Branches: (none, just devel needed) Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201733.m1KHXOvK000887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-20 12:33 EST ------- Umm, I think this is quite a bit premature. We don't yet have java guidelines, and, for example, the javadoc scriptlets that this package uses really should not be there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201748.m1KHmRZi013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 12:48 EST ------- Jason: Not having java guidelines does mean there are no limitations specific to java, so general guidelines apply. Once we have java guidelines this might or might not comply. In that case it, and not only it will have to be reviewed and fixed co comply. And when it comes to those scriptlets, I did not like them and so didn't Marek, but I assumed they have some reason for existance as they're found in many jpackage packages. I'd be happy to remove them when importing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201747.m1KHlp8a013878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-20 12:47 EST ------- For general packaging guidelines you can refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines For 0.1.0-2: * spec file name - must coincide with the name of main package, i.e. spec file must have the name "liblqr-1.spec". * Group tag - Usually the library related rpm has "Group: System Environment/Libraries" and its -devel subpackage usually has "Group: Development/Libraries". * Requires/BuildRequires - "BuildRequires: glib" is not needed. GIMP uses glib2, liblqr-1 also uses glib2 not glib (GLib 1). Also liblqr-1 has "BuildRequies: gimp-devel", which also pulls glib2 automatically. - "Requires: pkgconfig" must be removed from main package. The main package is not for development and pkgconfig must not be needed. - Also "Requires: gimp" is not needed for main package. This library does not need gimp itself, only gimp-libs is needed and such dependency are automatically treated by rpmbuild. - -devel subpackage does not need "Requires: gimp-devel". From installed pkgconfig .pc file and header files, only "glib2-devel" (and also pkgconfig) is needed as Requires for -devel subpackage - Also -devel subpackage must have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}" * License - For this package there is no reason that -devel subpackage should have different License tag. * macros usage consistency - If you want to use %__rm , please also use %__make %__install for consistency. * symlink for linkage - %{_libdir}/libXXXX.so should be in -devel package (%{_libdir}/libXXXX.so.X symlink should be in main package). This type of errors can be detected by using rpmlint commands (in rpmlint package). ------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost liblqr-1]$ rpmlint *0.1.0-2*rpm liblqr-1.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so ....... ------------------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing a rpm are owned by the rpm. For this package the directory %{_includedir}/lqr-1/, %{_includedir}/lpr must be owned by -devel subpackage. ! By the way, when you write: ------------------------------------------------------------- %files devel %{_includedir}/lqr-1/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %{_includedir}/lqr-1 and all files/directories/etc under %{_includedir}/lqr-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 17:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201754.m1KHsc7L004543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201801.m1KI1CUo016752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-20 13:01 EST ------- > Jason: Not having java guidelines does mean there are no limitations specific > to java, so general guidelines apply. Actually not. Look at all of the other Java packages blocking F-GUIDELINES. I just didn't have a chance to get to this one. We have quite a history of blocking packages on the ratification of guidelines. See PHP (PEAR and PECL packages), Haskell, Ocaml, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concord - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201821.m1KILOGu021001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concord - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 silfreed at silfreed.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Harmony - |Review Request: concord - |Software to program the |Software to program the |Logitech Harmony remote |Logitech Harmony remote |control |control ------- Additional Comments From silfreed at silfreed.net 2008-02-20 13:21 EST ------- Upstream has settled on renaming their software from "Harmony Remote" to "Concordance". They will also be splitting the app into CLI and library named concord and libconcord. I'll file a separate review request for libconcord once upstream has their source reorganized into a new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:30:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201830.m1KIURBw011681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: amanda https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbrich at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-20 13:30 EST ------- I'd like to pick this up, but I think it makes sense to jump to 2.6.0 which has just had a second beta release and will have a full release shortly. I've worked up a new package here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda-2.6.0-0.b2.fc8.src.rpm Changes are: * Wed Feb 20 2008 Orion Poplawski 2.6.0-0.b2 - Update to 2.6.0b2, drop upstreamed patches - Update xattrs patch - Add patches to fix install locations - Add -fPIE/-pie to CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, drop pie patch - Drop autotools BR - Drop /usr/bin/Mail BR and specify mailer as /bin/mail - Add %%check section - Move /etc/amanda/amandates to /var/lib/amanda/amandates - Remove ending . from summaries Also, I've commented out changing the user name in .amandahosts in the client %post script. I can go either way, but this is the name of the user on the server, not the client. TODO: - Fixup perl install location/requires - Update xinetd and default .amandahosts files - More rpmlint cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201850.m1KIoAll027054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-20 13:50 EST ------- Updated ... Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.6-1.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:51:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201851.m1KIpCxW027342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-20 13:51 EST ------- Thanks! FYI, I just noticed that 2.24-0 is out; I don't know if the changes are significant. Also, I wonder if you have given any thought to freefem3d. I've also received requests for it and so will have to start looking into it soon but if you've already started packaging it then I'd be happy to work with you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 18:59:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201859.m1KIxi4q017282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-20 13:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1-0.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201911.m1KJBxaC031644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From ncorrare at redhat.com 2008-02-20 14:11 EST ------- Beno?t: If you can give me the rpmlint rules you're using I can check before updating. Anyway, this have been fixed: Spec URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.awardspace.com/contrib/blueproximity-1.2.4-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201915.m1KJFPgg021172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-02-20 14:15 EST ------- Oh, subpackages shouldn't have a separate License: tag at all, should they? As I just said in comment#4, the -devel packages do have the correct dependencies. The mindless rule is not sufficient to tell. There is no separately published "upstream" package. The rawhide srpm is the canonical location of the source tar file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:27:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:27:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225723] Merge Review: elfutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201927.m1KJRwKW023353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-20 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Oh, subpackages shouldn't have a separate License: tag at all, should they? Correct, generally. > As I just said in comment#4, the -devel packages do have the correct > dependencies. The mindless rule is not sufficient to tell. Ah, I see. I misunderstood. > There is no separately published "upstream" package. The rawhide srpm is the > canonical location of the source tar file. My point was that it'd be good to have a current tarball placed at the hosted site, so that the Source0 tag could be set appropriately. Or, comment the above in the spec. Your call. Fix that and the License tags and we're set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201943.m1KJh4Ua004869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-20 14:43 EST ------- yum install rpmlint and just run rpmlint on each rpm : rpmlint blueproximity-1.2.4-4.fc8.src.rpm rpmlint blueproximity-1.2.4-4.fc8.noarch.rpm (I will do the review tomorrow) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802201946.m1KJkcQt005651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-20 14:46 EST ------- I've attempted #1 and #3, to no avail. I can't find where in the Makefile to patch for #2. Any suggestions? If not, i can just ExcludeArch, but I'd rather not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 19:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] New: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmccabe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/ricci.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/ricci-0.13.0-1.src.rpm Description: ricci is the agent that runs on locally on systems managed by conga. Conga is in RHEL4 and RHEL5, and more information about the project is at http://sourceware.org/cluster/conga/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:02:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202002.m1KK20lp029828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 rmccabe at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433679 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:01:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433679] New: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433679 Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmccabe at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/rmccabe/conga/clustermon-0.13.0-1.src.rpm Description: clustermon builds three packages: modclusterd, cluster-cim, and cluster-snmp. clustermon provides cluster information (membership, quorum, services, etc) to the ricci agent, and via snmp, remote systems. More information about the conga project is available at http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/conga -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202001.m1KK1BT9008398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:01 EST ------- Should we really be importing this before firefox is able to handle more than one bookmarks package? Is there a bug filed on that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:06:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202006.m1KK6rsJ009539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202008.m1KK8qkS031330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:14:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202014.m1KKEKRI010911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-02-20 15:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Thanks! > > FYI, I just noticed that 2.24-0 is out; I don't know if the changes are > significant. I'm working on making 2.23 build with gcc-4.3 right now. After that's done, I'll see what's new in 2.24. > Also, I wonder if you have given any thought to freefem3d. I've also received > requests for it and so will have to start looking into it soon but if you've > already started packaging it then I'd be happy to work with you. No, I have no plans for freefem3d. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:15:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216103] Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202015.m1KKFqmB000555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-names - A Twisted DNS implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216103 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216105] Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202014.m1KKEfE8032439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-web - Twisted web server, programmable in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216105 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208169] Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202016.m1KKGW0g000667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-core - An asynchronous networking framework written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208169 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 15:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202017.m1KKHjhV011757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-20 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #72) > I've attempted #1 and #3, to no avail. I can't find where in the Makefile to > patch for #2. > > Any suggestions? If not, i can just ExcludeArch, but I'd rather not. Sorry, my bad, I forgot that vdrift is usin sconstruct not autconf/make. Adding this to %prep should do the trick: %ifarch ppc ppc64 sed -i 's/linuxx86/linuxppc/' src/SConscript %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:30:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202030.m1KKUsOv014550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-02-20 15:30 EST ------- I've updated the source to the latest version. New spec file and srpm are as follows: Spec URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matbooth.co.uk/fedora/eclipse-epic-0.6.20-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202034.m1KKYe0u015068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292 caolanm at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202039.m1KKdXTe016059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-20 15:39 EST ------- Eric asked me to take a look over the package as well, and I do have the power to sponsor... Well, first, a few things w/the spec: 1) Rather than the compile_console define, I'd suggest: %define with_console %{?_without_console: 0} %{?!_without_console: 1} With that, you can do 'rpmbuild -bb --without console' to disable building the console if you want. 2) the dist tag should be '%{?dist}'. The addition of the question mark lets the package also build if for some reason dist isn't defined. 3) in the Requires/BuildRequires section, its not a mandate, but I personally prefer to see things wrapped at 80 chars, just use multiple R/BR lines. 4) For anything with an initscript, the chkconfig R should be: Requires(post): chkconfig Requires(preun): chkconfig You should also have this: Requires(preun): /sbin/service These are safeguards to make sure these bits are present when called from the %post and %preun scripts, as they could otherwise be included in the same rpm transaction, but not available when this package needs 'em (slim chance of it happening, but it can). More on the need for /sbin/service in a bit... 5) I'd avoid the extra define for "config_console". I'd just tweak %config based on the value of %with_console. 6) don't use '-n ocfs2-tools-devel', just use 'devel'. The %{name}- gets automagically pre-pended. 7) your -devel package includes a .pc file, therefore, the -devel package must Requires: pkgconfig. 8) drop the '-n ocfs2-tools-%{version}' from the %setup line, that's what it does by default. 9) the spec should have a comment included as to why _smp_mflags can't be used. 10) CFLAGS and/or CPPFLAGS aren't being respected. This one appears to require some source patching to get the build to use the standard Fedora flags. 11) no need to redirect anything to /dev/null on chkconfig commands 12) in %preun, before you chkconfig --del the services, you need to make sure they're stopped first. Thus the need for /sbin/service. 13) %defattr's should be (-,root,root,-) 14) generally, one should use %dir for including a directory in a package, with a subsequent line or lines covering what files in the dir should be included. I believe just about everything, save the Fedora CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS not being respected, should be fixed by the spec diff I'll attach in a second... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 20:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202041.m1KKfNYv016745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-20 15:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295445) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295445&action=view) Suggested spec changes in diff format -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 21:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202113.m1KLDk93012807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-20 16:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Should we really be importing this before firefox is able to handle more than > one bookmarks package? Is there a bug filed on that? There's no bug. Discussion on #fedora-devel has been based on idea that the bookmark file is included in firefox itself, which is not true. The standard bookmark file is in separate package default-bookmarks and thus can be excluded from the spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 21:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202123.m1KLNVW6025926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 21:54:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429086] Review Request: sonic-visualiser - A program for viewing and exploring audio data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202154.m1KLs5V7032311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sonic-visualiser - A program for viewing and exploring audio data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429086 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 429086 depends on bug 429084, which changed state. Bug 429084 Summary: Review Request: vamp-plugin-sdk - An API for audio analysis and feature extraction plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429084 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-20 16:54 EST ------- Update: sonic-visualiser has been in Rawhide for a few days. Holding back on doing F-8 build because of a missing dependency in the first version of libfishsound I built, that s-v uses. Waiting until that enters stable first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 22:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433443] Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202205.m1KM5ceQ002737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-common-tuareg - Emacs mode for editing ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433443 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 22:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:55:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202255.m1KMtMZL000969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser [NEEDS WORK] Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433295 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 22:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202258.m1KMw6lc001154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: opengrok - A|Review Request: opengrok - A |wicked fast source browser |wicked fast source browser |[NEEDS WORK] | ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-20 17:58 EST ------- mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.noarch/ SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.noarch/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec Ready for review. Known outstanding issues: 1.) webapp doesn't work. Probably broken by upstream in snapshot. Will investigate more. 2.) SVN jar thingie; see blockers 3.) Dependencies; see blockers RPMlint: opengrok.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/svn-javahl.jar /usr/lib64/svn-javahl/svn-javahl.jar opengrok.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/svn-javahl.jar /usr/lib64/svn-javahl/svn-javahl.jar Both are related to bug #433295, it will go away once the bug is fixed. Rationale behind using the snapshot is features -- 0.5 can't be reconfigured without modifying WAR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 23:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 197974] Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202305.m1KN5b6X002969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracking bug for reviews stalled pending the adoption of guidelines Alias: F-GUIDELINES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=197974 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 23:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:05:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433497] Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202305.m1KN5ab6002948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swing-layout - Natural layout for Swing panels Alias: swing-layout-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433497 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 18:05 EST ------- I'm clearing the flags here and setting the FE_GUIDELINES blocker. Please help make sure there are java guidelines before reviewing this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 23:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202348.m1KNmwNC010547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 18:48 EST ------- in reply to comment #17: Not yet I don't think... someone from docs should comment here and set the flag to + (with a link to where it landed) or - (to say why they didn't think it was release note worthy. ;( While we are waiting, "Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 20 23:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802202350.m1KNo0wW021813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-02-20 18:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Hi Dan, Thanks for the review - this one has been stagnating. > some notes > - the log4net.pc file should be installed into %{_libdir}/pkgconfig (other .NET > devel packages are installing the *.pc files there) *fixed* > - the %{_libdir}/mono/gac directory is owned by mono-core, so you should package > only the %{_libdir}/mono/gac/log4net subdirectory *fixed* > - you must also set ExcludeArch: ppc64 as Mono doesn't exist there > *fixed* http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net.spec http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Regards Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 01:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433174] Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210100.m1L10UnH022832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeeze - A modern and advanced archive manager for the Xfce Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433174 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 20:00 EST ------- 1. I fixed the rpath issue and synced up a new spec file, but forgot to regenerate the src.rpm. So, if you built from src.rpm thats the issue. ;( 2. Removed the unneeded libxfce4util BuildRequires. 3. Yeah, it worked for me a while ago, but I just built it for f8 and installed it on my laptop, and it locked it up solid. ;( I guess for item 3 we should look at trying to get more info for upstream. Clearly issue 3 should be solved before this is imported. ;( New spec/src.rpm: Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/squeeze-0.2.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433735] New: Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433735 Summary: Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgcroots/libgcroots.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgcroots/libgcroots-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: libgcroots abstracts architecture-dependent part of garbage collector roots acquisition such as register windows of SPARC and register stack backing store of IA-64. This library encourages to have own GC such as for small-footprint, some application-specific optimizations, just learning or to test experimental ideas. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210253.m1L2rEXJ022046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:53 EST ------- nettle-1.15-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2sEBw022314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:54 EST ------- demorse-0.8-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433234] Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2sLKb022346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: demorse - Command line tool for decoding Morse code signals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433234 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:54 EST ------- demorse-0.8-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210252.m1L2qh6L021968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:52 EST ------- colrdx-1.02-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2s90q022273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.3.2-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210253.m1L2rGUD022082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.15-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2s6mP011423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:54 EST ------- waf-1.3.2-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:53:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:53:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210253.m1L2rrOa011371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:53 EST ------- gpsk31-0.3-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:56:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210256.m1L2u9Me012268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:56 EST ------- ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433170] Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210255.m1L2tUkN012130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsk31 - PSK31 for Linux with a GTK+ Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433170 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:55 EST ------- gpsk31-0.3-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433167] Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2skgG011525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: colrdx - Ham radio DX-cluster client with curses color support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433167 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:54 EST ------- colrdx-1.02-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210254.m1L2sqRg011566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:54 EST ------- ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:56:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:56:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433160] Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210256.m1L2urnJ012466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-tools - Tools used to configure an ax.25 enabled computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433160 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:56 EST ------- ax25-tools-0.0.8-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429445] Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210256.m1L2uP59023326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: waf - A Python-based build system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429445 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:56 EST ------- waf-1.3.2-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432228] Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210257.m1L2v69Y023446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nettle - A low-level cryptographic library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432228 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:57 EST ------- nettle-1.15-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 02:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433159] Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210256.m1L2uJHS023279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ax25-apps - AX.25 ham radio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433159 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-20 21:56 EST ------- ax25-apps-0.0.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210301.m1L31tdq024818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-20 22:01 EST ------- > _IMO_ it is better that libopts related packages are named to show explicitly > that they are subpackages of autogen I like this. > If you don't know why alternatives is used here (note that I > don't know either) it should just be dropped. Alright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226302] Merge Review: pm-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210312.m1L3Cu50016216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pm-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226302 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 22:12 EST ------- Hey Till. Any chance we can revisit the remaining items and get this review finished off? If you prefer I can re-review the current rawhide spec, just let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210310.m1L3A1lt026235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 22:10 EST ------- yeah. So, what is the issue with just replacing the hard coded '/usr/lib' with '%{_libdir}' ? The python .so's are already under libdir, so they are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210313.m1L3DjUP016412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 22:13 EST ------- Hey Ondrej, any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:16:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226456] Merge Review: system-config-display In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210316.m1L3G674017128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-display https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226456 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-20 22:16 EST ------- Any further news here Ajax? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] New: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: airlied at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~airlied/nouveau/xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~airlied/nouveau/xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Reverse Engineered Xorg X11 driver for nvidia hardware provided by the nouveau project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210335.m1L3Z7r3031409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 eric at epkphoto.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at epkphoto.com ------- Additional Comments From eric at epkphoto.com 2008-02-20 22:35 EST ------- I'm just wondering how this package review is going. I for one would love to start playing around with bongo installed from a fedora repo. I'm certainly not going to switch my data to bongo until it stables up a bit, but I sure would like to start playing with the system so I can give solid feedback to the developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 03:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210338.m1L3cVDO021154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-20 22:38 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen-5.9.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 04:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 328161] Review Request: concord - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210452.m1L4ql68013039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: concord - Software to program the Logitech Harmony remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=328161 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-20 23:52 EST ------- One comment on the spec file I keep meaning to say: You probably need to re-package the up-stream source tarball to remove the examples. I know you've removed them from the binary .rpm, but if they remain in the source tarball, then they'll end up in the .srpm file. This would still mean Fedora would be shipping unlicensed firmware etc. At least, I had to do this for the fxload package I made; you can find examples of what I did there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 04:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210455.m1L4taMV002637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-20 23:55 EST ------- Unfortunately rawhide ended up breaking so when I got back to this I couldn't build it. I'll get back to it as soon as rawhide unbreaks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 05:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433571] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210506.m1L56Uft004739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433571 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 06:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210634.m1L6Ye07018674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: perl-Math- |Review Request: perl-Math- |Symbolic - Symbolic |Symbolic - Symbolic |calculations |calculations Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-21 01:34 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=453228 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 87cb7c3e76227238a583c313226dd53e Math-Symbolic-0.510.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=25, Tests=512, 17 wallclock secs (15.51 cusr + 0.41 csys = 15.92 CPU) + Package perl-Math-Symbolic-0.510-1.fc9 => Provides: perl(Math::Symbolic) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::AuxFunctions) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Base) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Compiler) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Constant) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::Base) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultDumpers) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultMods) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultTests) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Derivative) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::ExportConstants) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::MiscAlgebra) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::MiscCalculus) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Operator) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Parser) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Parser::Precompiled) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::Parser::Yapp) perl(Math::Symbolic::Parser::Yapp::Driver) = 1.05 perl(Math::Symbolic::Variable) = 0.510 perl(Math::Symbolic::VectorCalculus) = 0.510 perl(Parse::RecDescent::Math::Symbolic::Parser::Precompiled) Requires: perl >= 0:5.004 perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(Math::Symbolic) perl(Math::Symbolic::AuxFunctions) perl(Math::Symbolic::Base) perl(Math::Symbolic::Compiler) perl(Math::Symbolic::Constant) perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom) perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::Base) perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultDumpers) perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultMods) perl(Math::Symbolic::Custom::DefaultTests) perl(Math::Symbolic::Derivative) perl(Math::Symbolic::ExportConstants) perl(Math::Symbolic::MiscAlgebra) perl(Math::Symbolic::Operator) perl(Math::Symbolic::Parser) perl(Math::Symbolic::Variable) perl(Memoize) perl(Parse::RecDescent) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * Not sure why build did not asked for perl-Sub-Exporter package. From README, it looked like this build should have BR:perl-Sub-Exporter. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 06:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210642.m1L6gkQK020216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |433638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 06:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210642.m1L6gjXs020170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |433644 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 06:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210643.m1L6hIJP031396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 06:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210640.m1L6eE0L030974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-21 01:40 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=453265 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ddec2540dfe7a719225d2abd5be3ce52 Math-MatrixReal-2.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=42, Tests=263, 8 wallclock secs ( 5.37 cusr + 0.36 csys = 5.73 CPU) + Package perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.03-1.fc9 => Provides: perl(Math::MatrixReal) = 2.03 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 09:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:11:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210911.m1L9BHNF013862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-21 04:11 EST ------- Ok, thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cloudy Short Description: Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 09:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210923.m1L9NrY9016249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 dan at danny.cz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-21 04:23 EST ------- Don't forget to increase %Release tag (and also update changelog entry) for each spec file public update. This iteration should be 1.2.10-2. Formal review is here: OK source files match upstream: 4f8ff9892665469f915855692c9fc02801038837 incubating-log4net-1.2.10.zip OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (ASL 2.0). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate (Mono app). OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (x86_64 Rawhide). N/A debuginfo package looks complete (no debuginfo - Mono app). OK rpmlint is silent. log4net.x86_64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. OK for Mono app log4net.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. OK for Mono app OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK has pkgconfig files in -devel subpackage. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. This package is APPROVED with the release updated to 2 (see above). Because of the ExcludeArch you should also create a bug to track this issue and make it block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64=238953, see e.g. #309191. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 09:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:52:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802210952.m1L9q9Nx021732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-02-21 04:52 EST ------- Please write me what provides/obsoletes do you need to add in EL-5 branch and rawhide and I'll add them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 11:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211132.m1LBWHLG017190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2008-02-21 06:32 EST ------- Hi, I'm new maintainer of system-config-bind I'm working on these issues now, it should be fixed soon... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 12:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211223.m1LCNkPx015882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Bug 433312 depends on bug 433295, which changed state. Bug 433295 Summary: subversion-javahl jar file shouldn't reside in %{_libdir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433295 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 12:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211232.m1LCWhkF027506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-21 07:32 EST ------- I put it in %setup, and it worked beautifully. Thanks! What's that, like, 2 or 3 beers I owe you, next time you're near Chicago? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 12:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211252.m1LCqkuC031028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-21 07:52 EST ------- Here's an updated version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-fileutils-0.3.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Feb 21 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.3.0-3 - Fixed grammar in the description section. - License is LGPLv2 with exceptions - Include license file with both RPMs. - Include other documentation only in the -devel RPM. BTW, my reading of the license is that it's LGPLv2 only (not "or later ..."). Am I mistaken? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 13:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:17:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211317.m1LDHRmf026313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-02-21 08:17 EST ------- According to http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5792 this package has landed in Rawhide. Closing ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 13:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433778] New: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidf at sjsoft.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://davidf.sjsoft.com/fedora/fsvs.spec SRPM URL: http://davidf.sjsoft.com/fedora/fsvs-1.1.12-3.fc8.src.rpm Project home URL: http://fsvs.tigris.org/ Description: FSVS is the abbreviation for ?Fast System VerSioning?. It is a complete backup/restore/versioning tool for all files in a directory tree or whole filesystems, with a subversionTM repository as the backend. You may think of it as some kind of tar or rsync with versioned storage. If uses a different system for storing local version information that doesn't clutter directories like /etc like .svn directories in standard subversion would A nice capability is to cope with local adjustments for different machines (using branching-like techniques), so that most of the space needed for the backup of system-files (/bin, /usr, ...) can be shared between machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 13:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211319.m1LDJaS0003429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778 davidf at sjsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 ------- Additional Comments From davidf at sjsoft.com 2008-02-21 08:19 EST ------- Forgot to mention that this is my first package submission and I'm seeking a sponsor :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 13:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211355.m1LDtAsA010085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-21 08:55 EST ------- About rpmlint & warnings, see bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 14:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234490] Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211402.m1LE2oov002191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: VDrift - VDrift is a cross-platform, open source driving/drift racing simulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234490 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-21 09:02 EST ------- Imported and built for all branches, including F-7, which was rawhide when this review was submitted. :) Thanks to everyone involved in making this possible! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 14:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 235249] Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211403.m1LE38ZN011975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdrift-data - VDrift data set https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235249 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-21 09:03 EST ------- Imported and built, all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 14:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211401.m1LE1eat011601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-21 09:01 EST ------- Upstream move to fast! Updated to 5.08 / OCaml 3.10.1. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-camlp5-5.08-1.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Feb 21 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 5.08-1 - New upstream version 5.08. - BR ocaml >= 3.10.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 14:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430295] Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211413.m1LEDAEX014373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator-libclamav - ClamAV module for python, created for SAGATOR project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430295 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-21 09:13 EST ------- This package will be obsolete for sagator-1.1.0 and higher (currently this package does not exist), so it is not requires to review this package. This new sagator works perfectly for EPEL-5, F-7 and higher, but there is no solution for EPEL-4 (sagator-1.1.0 + clamav usage requires python-ctypes not provided for EPEL-4). I am leaving this still open now, before the EPEL-4 problem will be solved, but coexistence of sagator-1.1.0 with sagator-libclamav is not planned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 15:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211527.m1LFR2kA029897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2008-02-21 10:27 EST ------- Everything should be fixed now: system-config-bind-4.0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 15:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211550.m1LFocSK001916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-21 10:50 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois.spec SRPM URL: http://jorton.fedorapeople.org/pakchois/pakchois-0.4-1.src.rpm Update again for 0.4. Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 15:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433814] New: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp-0.9.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: KuFtp is a graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment. It's written in C++ using the QT/KDE libraries. It implements many features required for usable FTP interaction. Most notable features is Tab Sessions like Konqueror or Firefox, that is,you can have multiple simultaneous FTP session in separate tabs. Other features like bookmark manager,history recording,queue manager and some small nifty features are currently available in the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:00:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 386531] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211600.m1LG0h30004487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP Client for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=386531 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-21 11:00 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433814 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:00:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211600.m1LG0ia3004528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus at shortymail.net ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-21 11:00 EST ------- *** Bug 386531 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:03:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:03:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211603.m1LG3POI027866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-21 11:03 EST ------- Any sense in putting Sunbird into repo? Thunderbird 3 will bring same functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:11:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211611.m1LGBx46007157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar Alias: sunbird-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-21 11:11 EST ------- Jakub: Nonexistent applications are generally poor replacement over existing ones :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:28:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211628.m1LGSERk010502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-21 11:28 EST ------- - Correct files section Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/kuftp/kuftp-0.9.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 16:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211638.m1LGcGDq002347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-02-21 11:38 EST ------- How about I do the %{python_sitelib} macro trick? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:10:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211710.m1LHAIji010115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 12:10 EST ------- My understanding is that the release note status is orthogonal to the resolution of the ticket. At least that's how we process the CVS queue; if the flag is '?' we look at it, regardless of whether the ticket is open or now. Honestly I'm just trying to get my bug list down, because it gets difficult to track how many reviews I have in flight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211709.m1LH9vgn019416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-21 12:09 EST ------- I think that we can assume that lineno version won't change soon, so the following should be right: Obsolete: tetex-lineno = 4.41 Provides: tetex-lineno = 4.41 And also in texlive for EL-6. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211723.m1LHNxeS012962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211723.m1LHNZW3012885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-21 12:23 EST ------- For 0.1.0-3: * Description - The %description of -devel package is wrong. -------------------------------------------------------------- %description devel The libqr-devel package contains the static libraries and header files ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -------------------------------------------------------------- * .so symlink location (In reply to comment #7) > * symlink for linkage > - %{_libdir}/libXXXX.so should be in -devel package > (%{_libdir}/libXXXX.so.X symlink should be in main package). > This type of errors can be detected by using rpmlint > commands (in rpmlint package). > ------------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost liblqr-1]$ rpmlint *0.1.0-2*rpm > liblqr-1.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so > ....... > ------------------------------------------------------------- - Please check your rpms by rpmlint to detect generic packaging errors. For newest rpm: --------------------------------------------------------------- liblqr-1-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 liblqr-1-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 --------------------------------------------------------------- What I said was: - %_libdir/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 and %_libdir/liblqr-1.so.0 must be in main package - %_libdir/liblqr-1.so must be moved to -devel package. * BuildRequires - Well, I rechecked BuildRequires and actually glib2-devel is sufficient for BuildRequires (gimp-devel is not needed for BuildRequires) * Typo - Please fix below (by the way with this typo rebuild actually fails....) --------------------------------------------------------------- find %buildroot -name \*.la -exec %rm -f {} \; ^^^^ --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211731.m1LHVtuZ024111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-21 12:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-MatrixReal Short Description: Manipulate matrix of Reals Owners: pertusus Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 17:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426103] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211753.m1LHrxor018718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426103 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-21 12:53 EST ------- Built in rawhide, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 18:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:04:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429700] Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211804.m1LI4kSe020832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bing - bandwidth ping https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429700 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-21 13:04 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 18:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211823.m1LINesU000856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 18:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251536] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211853.m1LIrLuW006898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-diamondtouch - Xorg diamondtouch input driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251536 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-02-21 13:53 EST ------- Built in rawhide, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 19:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211916.m1LJGehV002002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 19:16:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211916.m1LJGPTE001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-21 14:16 EST ------- I don't see the Sub::Exporter reference in the README, maybe it is only on the web? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Symbolic Short Description: Symbolic calculations Owners: pertusus Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 19:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211922.m1LJMV6k012793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2008-02-21 14:22 EST ------- I see only two rpmlint. errors, quite easy to fix: [ruben at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.fc9.i386.rpm postgresql-slony1.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13 0644 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. [ruben at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -i rpmbuild/SRPMS/postgresql-slony1-1.2.13-1.fc9.src.rpm postgresql-slony1.src:229: W: macro-in-%changelog docs Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. Could you please go through the spec file and the comments in this review and see if they still apply? For instance the specific fixes for 1.2.10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 19:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211924.m1LJO0ZZ003261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2008-02-21 14:23 EST ------- Hi Patrice, Do you want to take over this review? Thanks, Ruben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 19:34:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802211934.m1LJYpQT005070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-02-21 14:34 EST ------- Sure, I'll take a look at them soon -- did you also run rpmlint against -doc package? Regards, Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:19:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433863] New: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863 Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dradez at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.radez.net/rpm/python-pysvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.radez.net/rpm/python-pysvn-1.5.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Python library to subversion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:20:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212020.m1LKKsdM023625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #294042|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-21 15:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295556) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295556&action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file, with diff applied Jarod, Thank you for your review and your changes to the spec. I have looked them over and incorporated your patch into a new version of ocfs2-tools.spec, which I will attach. In the meantime, I'll look into the source changes required to honor the fedora build flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212026.m1LKQU34024724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-02-21 15:26 EST ------- Hi Xavier, It looks like we started from the same DAG rpm. :) Don't forget that the /etc/nagios/*.cfg files need to be mode 0600 and readable only by root because they contain encryption passwords. Since you've also worked on the same package, would you like to review and/or comaintain this with me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212057.m1LKvTNb021397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:56:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212056.m1LKuDqA030389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-02-21 15:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Don't forget to increase %Release tag (and also update changelog entry) for each > spec file public update. This iteration should be 1.2.10-2. Gah, well spotted. > This package is APPROVED with the release updated to 2 (see above). Many thanks for the review Dan, greatly appreciated. > Because of the ExcludeArch you should also create a bug to track this issue and > make it block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64=238953, see e.g. #309191. Will do, as soon as it gets imported and appears in the bz list. Thanks again, Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 20:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212056.m1LKuef3030467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 15:56 EST ------- OK, rawhide unbroke and I finally managed to get my local mirror updated. So it's clear, I'm reviewing the package with the libiverbs-devel dependency included. This package includes a static libarary. That's OK (it's discouraged but still left to the maintainer's discretion) but we have a few guidelines to follow. Specifically, the static library needs to be in a separate -static package. See the "Packaging Static Libraries" section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for more info. * source files match upstream: 6ce541b0de7752d87782901ffe45a2035eb499a548f80a278e8ce5102d032148 librdmacm-1.0.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: librdmacm-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm.so.1(RDMACM_1.0)(64bit) librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = /sbin/ldconfig libibverbs.so.1()(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.0)(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.1)(64bit) librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm-devel-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm-devel = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = /usr/include/infiniband/verbs.h librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm-utils-1.0.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm librdmacm-utils = 1.0.6-1.fc9 = libibverbs.so.1()(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.0)(64bit) libibverbs.so.1(IBVERBS_1.1)(64bit) librdmacm = 1.0.6-1.fc9 librdmacm.so.1()(64bit) librdmacm.so.1(RDMACM_1.0)(64bit) * %check is not present because there's no updates. I have no idea how to actually test this, although I did run the installed binaries and verified that they either printed help messages or complained about lack of infiniband hardware. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * unversioned so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. X static libraries are present but not in a -static package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:05:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212105.m1LL5PgO023407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-21 16:05 EST ------- Please use a new package template from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure so we know what branches you want, what owners, etc. please reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212109.m1LL9hkG024103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 16:09 EST ------- I really thought I had sent a reply to this ticket. Anyway, if you agree to the change of the license tag, just say so and I'll be happy to approve this package. Or if you'd prefer to hear back from upstream first, just say so and we'll wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212117.m1LLHGfL002133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-21 16:17 EST ------- Sure, but then they both provide the same files, so there should be an explicit 'Conflicts' here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts "Keep in mind that implicit conflicts are NEVER acceptable. If your package conflicts with another package, then you must either resolve the conflict, or mark it with Conflicts:" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:25:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212125.m1LLPkVM003772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-21 16:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212129.m1LLTFYS027590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-21 16:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212134.m1LLYsrn028648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 16:34 EST ------- Any reason why this shouldn't be closed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212135.m1LLZ2uf029032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 snecklifter at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-02-21 16:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: log4net Short Description: Logging for the .Net Framework Owners: snecker Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212133.m1LLXlHb028547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 16:33 EST ------- Well, the COPYING file says: The Library is distributed under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2 (found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2 on debian systems). but all of the files in the libfileutils-ocaml directory say: (* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or *) (* modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public *) (* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either *) (* version 2 of the License, or any later version ; with the OCaml *) (* static compilation exception. *) and the statements on the code always win unless, of course, there is an issue with combining them which would somehow limit the license. Of course, someone should introduce a clue to upstream about this, but in the meantime it really does look like LGPLv2+ to me. Honestly the issue of a plus or not isn't something worth holding this package up over; you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 21:50:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212150.m1LLoSKF008407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 22:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212210.m1LMAohm012216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 17:10 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint says: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 3) which I don't really care about, fix it if you like. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.5-2 1:0.0.10-1.fc9 You probably just want to start afresh with your changelog, but if not you should at least have an entry for the current revision. Could you provide instructions for generating the tarball in use? Just a coupe of comments for checking out a specific git tag from the repository should be fine; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for more info. Is this actually version 0.0.10 or is it a snapshot from the source tree made after 0.0.10 was released? If the latter, we have specific guidelines relating to the versioning of snapshots, which would indicate that this should be 0.0.10-1.20080221 or 0.0.10-1.20080221git (what follows the date is up to you; some use an abbreviated commit ID). Have to run now; more review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 22:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212218.m1LMIfXt013379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-21 17:18 EST ------- So... I've been asked to step in and be the mediator here, since I've not been involved in the debate at all. Though full disclosure: I do have past history as a contributor to Axel's ATrpms.net repo, and know a fair amount about the work he's put in to get to the point where we (fedora) could actually distribute an ivtv-firmware package. I'm still reading over everything on the matter (the bugs, some emails, fesco meeting notes, etc), and will give some feedback soonish... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 22:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212220.m1LMK7cl013886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-21 17:20 EST ------- Taking over review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 22:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212223.m1LMNKsX014290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ivtv - An |Review Request: ivtv - |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 |userspace tools for |driver |iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 | |driven devices ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-21 17:23 EST ------- Changing summary slightly. This isn't the driver, that's in the kernel... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 22:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212231.m1LMV15k006939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-21 17:31 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-fileutils Short Description: OCaml library for common file and filename operations Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 23:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433892] New: Review Request: xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin - GSynaptics icon for the Xfce Settings Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433892 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin - GSynaptics icon for the Xfce Settings Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-gsynaptics-mcs-plugin-1.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A simple MCS plugin for Xfce that starts gsynaptics when invoked and launches gsynaptics-init once loaded by the MCS manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 21 23:51:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802212351.m1LNp75S021344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-02-21 18:51 EST ------- I'll change the license tag, of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 00:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220010.m1M0A3K7024395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 19:10 EST ------- Did you happen to see this bit, which Lennart had asked about in the other review ticket (without response): http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/avahi-distcc.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 00:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429609] Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220038.m1M0c9uI028836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-SpeedyCGI - Speed up perl scripts by running them persistently https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429609 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-21 19:38 EST ------- OK, cool. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 01:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220120.m1M1KtAc003632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #295556|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-21 20:20 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295577) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295577&action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file against latest ocfs2-tools git The following two urls contain an srpm and spec file for my latest work. http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-6.20080221git.fc8.src.rpm http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec Ocfs2-tools upstream git repository has been updated with patches to honor user-set cflags. My tests show that the entire Fedora CFLAGS line is passed through to the build process. The spec file and srpm uploaded reflect these new changes. Thanks again for pointing this out - we actually considered it a bug that user-set CFLAGS weren't being honored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 02:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220219.m1M2JYSp013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 ------- Additional Comments From airlied at redhat.com 2008-02-21 21:19 EST ------- okay I've fixed the changelog, and versioning and tab char... so the new stuff is at the same URL. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.10-0.20080221git5db7920.fc9.src.rpm is new src rpm name and I've updated the specfile to build that from the tar ball, and added instructions for git cloning it. The upstream project hasn't yet done a release, the version is based off the kernel API they use and report in the log files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 02:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220241.m1M2fLh6031984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-21 21:41 EST ------- That should work great... let me know if you want me to test here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 03:10:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220310.m1M3AMpR004881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-02-21 22:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > I'm just wondering how this package review is going. I for one would love to > start playing around with bongo installed from a fedora repo. I'm certainly not > going to switch my data to bongo until it stables up a bit, but I sure would > like to start playing with the system so I can give solid feedback to the > developers. Hi, Eric. Mock was complaining a lot before I realized that I had almost no disk space left on /var. I've fixed that up and now am about half-done or so with the review; I should have it finished by tomorrow assuming no further complications. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 03:38:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] New: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Note: The creation of this package was triggered by bug 433742, and subsequent mailing list discussion. I'll be asking the existing unison package maintainer to review it if possible. Spec URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13.spec SRPM URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13-2.13.16-4.fc8.src.rpm Description: Unison is a file-synchronization tool. It allows two replicas of a collection of files and directories to be stored on different hosts (or different locations on the same host), modified separately, and then brought up to date by propagating the changes in each replica to the other. This package is a compatibility release, for those users who need to interoperate with systems having a specific version of Unison installed. Users without this requirement should use the regular "unison" package, which will always contain the most up-to-date stable version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 04:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220435.m1M4Zcpd020922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-21 23:35 EST ------- *** Bug 433742 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 05:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433924] Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220531.m1M5VswI029929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433924 rvandolson at esri.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 05:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:31:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433924] New: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433924 Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvandolson at esri.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.5-4.src.rpm Description: libyahoo2 is a C library interface to the new Yahoo! Messenger protocol. It supports almost all current features of the protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 05:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433925] New: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 Summary: Review Request: libyahoo2 - Library for the Yahoo! Messenger Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/libyahoo2/libyahoo2-0.7.5-4.src.rpm Description: libyahoo2 is a C library interface to the new Yahoo! Messenger protocol. It supports almost all current features of the protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 05:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433926] Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220535.m1M5ZqGs015986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-02-22 00:35 EST ------- This relies on libyahoo2 which has a review request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 05:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433926] New: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433926 Summary: Review Request: freehoo - Freehoo is a free console based messenger for Yahoo IM Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bludgeon.org/~rayvd/rpms/freehoo/freehoo-3.5.1-1.src.rpm Description: This is a simple Yahoo Messenger client that requires no windowing system, and it therefore can be quite useful in situations where a minimal system is being used or when a windowing system is otherwise unavailable or unfeasible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 08:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220850.m1M8oG6s016522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-02-22 03:50 EST ------- is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 09:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220923.m1M9NLuG004954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-22 04:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=295402) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295402&action=view) [edit] > Patch to remove ASL 1.1 part for GPLv2+ compatibility > > By the way: > > - speech-dispatcher (bug 432259), which depends on this bug, is > licensed under GPLv2+. > So to make use of speech-dispatcher the license of dotconf must > be GPLv2+ compatible. > > - However currently this package (dotconf) is licensed under > LGPLv2 and ASL 1.1 as build log shows: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 > -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13/libpool > -Wall -g -o libdotconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 10:4:10 -release > 1.0 -export-dynamic dotconf.lo readdir.lo > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > and src/readdir.c is ASL 1.1 > Note that ASL 1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible, so this situation is not > allowed. > > Fortunately for Linux as far as I checked the source code > we can built this package without src/readdir.{c,h}. The attached > file makes this package surely LGPLv2. I have again updated the file at the server. Have included the patch file on the server also link:http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf- 1.0.13.patch. I have done all the edits as said except for the last one - For %{_bindir}/dotconf-config (in the source tarball it was dotconf-config.in), @libdir@ is expanded as /usr/lib on 32bits machine but /usr/lib64 on 64bits machine on Fedora. This means that /usr/bin/dotconf-config differs between on 32 bits machine and on 64 bits machine. Currently Fedora does not allow this type of multilib conflicts for -devel subpackage. I am a complete newbie to package building so can you please provide me some pointer regarding this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 09:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:41:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220941.m1M9f4ko008330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-02-22 04:41 EST ------- Just a quick question before I apply it. Wouldn't it be better to: Obsoletes: tetex-lineno < 4.42 Provides: tetex-lineno = 4.42 in order to not to let texlive-texmf provide the same package as it obsoletes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 09:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802220948.m1M9mAmH027813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-22 04:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Xavier, > Hi Wart, > It looks like we started from the same DAG rpm. :) Don't forget that the > /etc/nagios/*.cfg files need to be mode 0600 and readable only by root because > they contain encryption passwords. > > Since you've also worked on the same package, would you like to review and/or > comaintain this with me? Sure, that's the plan, but I'm short on time at the moment so I just pointed you at my unfinished work so you may (or may not) cherry-pick from it. I'll get back to it next week hopefully. Regards, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 10:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221018.m1MAINdj002306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-22 05:18 EST ------- Renaming the binary is probably a bad idea, in the case that this package installed on the server side, as the client will try to call "unison" on the server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 11:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221107.m1MB7H9v012047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From kuznetsov.alexey at gmail.com 2008-02-22 06:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > BTW the legal status of MLDonkey is stil questionable - I asked Tom Callaway > some time ago and he didn't provides clean answer whether we may distribute > p2p-software such as MLDonkey, aMule etc. > > We already have almost finished package at Livna's bugzilla: > > http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487 > > but its obvious that shipping MLDonkey in main Fedora repo will be preferred. > > The only thing is left is to fix config-files so we could simply use generic > make install instead of manually copying files with install tool. > Fedora already contain that kind software. DC++ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/valknut torrent's https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bittorrent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 11:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221116.m1MBGae6013706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 denis at poolshark.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-22 06:16 EST ------- icecream integration: so icecream offers a similar service to distcc, and enables the service automatically by using a ccache-style file in profile.d. To be honest, I cringe in horror when I look at /etc/profile.d/icecream.sh: it manually check for the presence of ccache and changes its path order accordingly. How can that possibly scale when more and more projects want to provide a gcc alternative ? I guess that would be a would debate to have on fedora-devel or on the packaging committee (assuming it didn't happen already). So if you have both distcc and icecream installed, and if you use distcc the old fashioned way with "make CC=distcc", distcc will be called first, but builds scheduled to localhost will then invoke icecream, which will fall back to localhost again or go remote if icecream is configured. So it will work of course, but may confuse some people if you actually configured both servicess. About Lennart's avahi patch: Lennart I had some issues with your patch: it touches both "configure" and "configure.ac", and a Makefile.in change references a file "distccmon-gnome.1" that's not part of the tarball and causing "make install" to fail. I massaged the patch to make it build and gave the feature a try on a virtual machine. Unfortunately I was unable to make it work. distccd starts correctly with --zeroconf (although the verbose log mentions nothing about avahi service being enabled?), but I'm seeing this ominous message on the client system when I start distccd: Feb 22 11:54:27 jupiler avahi-daemon[30737]: Invalid legacy unicast query packet. Feb 22 11:54:28 jupiler avahi-daemon[30737]:last message repeated 2 times (server and client systems run F-8). Any thoughts ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 12:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221225.m1MCPN9j025918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-02-22 07:25 EST ------- Yes, the patch is a bit dirty and based on Debian's distcc tarball. It's perfectly fine to ignore the missing files. The legacy unicast issues are unrelated to the distcc patch. It's probably borked multicast support in your virtual machine software. What VM system did you use? Have you configured it for bridging support? Unless you enable bridging for the VM mDNS (multicasting) will not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 14:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221450.m1MEoHrU009416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-22 09:50 EST ------- Lennart, the VM was probably be the problem. I used VMWare, in NAT mode. I tried a simpler approach by running distccd locally, and that seems to work better. I did however have one occurrence of this error: > distcc -j distcc[4016] (dcc_parse_tcp_host) ERROR: invalid tcp port specification in ":213:e8ff:fea3:b66f:1234/8 192.168.127.1:1234/8 " > cat .distcc/zeroconf/hosts fe80::213:e8ff:fea3:b66f:1234/8 192.168.127.1:1234/8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 15:41:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] New: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-zip.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-zip-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files This Objective Caml library provides easy access to compressed files in ZIP and GZIP format, as well as to Java JAR files. It provides functions for reading from and writing to compressed files in these formats. --------- Passes rpmlint. Builds on Rawhide against OCaml 3.10.1 (also works with 3.10.0 on F-8). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 16:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434353] New: renameutils package not in official Fedora repo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434353 Summary: renameutils package not in official Fedora repo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ploujj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: There is no renameutils in the official Fedora repositories Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): I only tried this in Fedora 8. How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install renameutils 2. 3. Actual results: no package named 'renameutils' is found Expected results: renameutils are installed successfully Additional info: There are actually RPMs available for this package: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/renameutils/ I prefer not to install any RPMs that are not in the official Fedora repositories to avoid conflicts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 16:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221608.m1MG8VED016809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-02-22 11:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Sure, but then they both provide the same files, so there should be an explicit > 'Conflicts' here? You're right, completely forgot about it. My spec file and SRPM are updated. Chris Aillon told me there are no plans to implement multiple-bookmarks-files capability into Firefox... So I guess this is our only solution even if it's ugly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 16:55:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221655.m1MGtxeU031178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 11:55 EST ------- For 5.9.4-2: * autogen-manuals - new autogen package should "obsolete" this package. ? BR: chrpath - Well, would you try to remove rpath by not using chrpath? ("Removing Rpath" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) Using chrpath should be considered as a last resort.. Usually modifying libtool (or make LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool) removes rpath. * License tag (See License-check.log) - Actually as %{_includedir}/autoopts/options.h (and so on) is LGPLv3+, "BSD or" part must be deleted. * defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * pkgconfig file - Well, autoopts.pc file contains ------------------------------------------------------------- 11 ldopts="-Wl,-R" 25 Libs: -Wl,-R/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lopts ------------------------------------------------------------- "-Wl,-R" sets rpath and this must be deleted. ! multilib conflict - autoopts/autoopts-config.in contains ------------------------------------------------------------- 20 libdir="@libdir@" ------------------------------------------------------------- or so, which differs between on 32bit arch and on 64bit arch. So this causes multilib conflict. Please try to resolve this conflict. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks * Undefined non weak symbols - libguileopts.so has undefined non-weak symbols From rpmlint (on i386): ------------------------------------------------------------- autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_i_master_freelist autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_i_master_freelist2 autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_cells_allocated autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_i_freelist autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_i_freelist2 autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 scm_gc_for_newcell autogen-libopts.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libguileopts.so.0.0.1 gh_eval_str ------------------------------------------------------------- ( you can check this also by "ldd -r /usr/lib/libguileopts.so") libguileopts.so is in -devel package, i.e. used for linkage so leaving these symbols is not allowed because this causes linkage failure. * scriptlets - For /sbin/install-info, for some reason Fedora requests to use -------------------------------------------------------------- /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : ^^^^ -------------------------------------------------------------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:19:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] New: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/aprsd.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/aprsd-2.2.5-15.2.fc8.src.rpm Description: APRSd is an APRS server program that uses amateur radio and internet services to convey GPS mapping, weather, and positional data. It has been developed by and for amateur radio enthusiasts to provide real-time data in an easy to use package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221732.m1MHWAhR005338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 12:32 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221733.m1MHX11c005511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(geoff at programmer- | |monk.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 12:33 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:32:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221732.m1MHWCXx005359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-22 12:32 EST ------- Renaming the binary is required so that the unison and unison2.13 packages can co-exist on the same machine. On other systems that support parallel installation of multiple versions of Unison (e.g. Cygwin, and I have to assume Debian/Ubuntu too), this is the way it works, so it's not remotely unexpected to users of Unison. Similarly, Unison itself supports the "addversiono" option that'll attempt to invoke e.g. unison-2.13 on the server instead of plain unison. In this package, the binary is renamed to match what Unison will attempt to invoke (when using this option.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:31:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:31:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221731.m1MHVdFP020766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 12:31 EST ------- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221735.m1MHZZDL006350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 12:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295663) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295663&action=view) Patch to resolve multilib issue * As we don't ship libpool.a, the part related to libpool.a can be removed from dotconf-config.in. * -L%{_libdir} is always unneeded. The attached patch should resolve multilib issue. When you modify your spec file, please change the release number to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:42:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221742.m1MHgYUR022951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-22 12:42 EST ------- Umm.. rpm scriptlet (%post, %postun...) must not handle files under user's home directory. User may customize their desktop menu entry by their way and removing them on uninstall of this rpm is not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431161] Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221752.m1MHql3F024873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mathmap - A gimp plugin and commandline tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431161 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-02-22 12:52 EST ------- I need to take the time to convince it to honor the %optflags, but I haven't had a chance yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:01:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221801.m1MI1G8r011136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-22 13:01 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 17:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221758.m1MHwsWC010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-22 12:58 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221806.m1MI66bD012464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-22 13:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:03:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432265] Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221803.m1MI3i2S011793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432265 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-22 13:03 EST ------- Yeah, pretty non ideal. ;( Oh well, sometimes thats the way it goes... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:22:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359911] Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221822.m1MIMA9i015384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-views - Provides a method for site designers to control content presentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359911 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-22 13:22 EST ------- Drupal 6.0 hitting rawhide, 6.x version of this module not yet ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359961] Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221821.m1MILiFp030609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-service_links - Enables admins to add links to a number of sites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359961 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-22 13:21 EST ------- Drupal 6.0 going to rawhide, 6.x version of this module not yet ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221824.m1MIOY9G030924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-22 13:24 EST ------- Drupal 6.0 is hitting rawhide, the 6.x version of this module is not yet ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359921] Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221823.m1MIN7O1030747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-cck - Allows you create and customize fields using a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359921 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-22 13:23 EST ------- Drupal 6.0 is hitting rawhide, the 6.x version is not ready and depends upon the 6.x version of views. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:23:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:23:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434557] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434557 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orion at cora.nwra.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Log-Trivial.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/perl-Log-Trivial-0.31-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Use this module when you want use "Yet Another" very simple, light weight log file writer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:23:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359931] Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221823.m1MINwBb015662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drupal-date - This package contains both the Date module and a Date API module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359931 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-22 13:23 EST ------- Drupal 6.0 is hitting rawhide, the 6.x version of this module is not yet ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221837.m1MIbbSg001076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:42:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221842.m1MIgQwo019179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-22 13:42 EST ------- Excellent, looking much better! I have two tiny little changes left for the spec: 1) for the sake of consistency, use either '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}' or 'ocfs2-tools = %{version}-%{release}' in both ocfs2console and ocfs2-tools-devel. Right now, one has one form, one has the other. (Actually my fault, since my earlier patch changed one and not the other) 2) pull the bits about grepping for CFLAGS out of the spec. I assume they were just there to verify they were getting passed through correctly. Now for the full review checklist: Fedora Package Review: ocfs2-tools ---------------------------------- MUST Items: * rpmlint output acceptable (post full output w/waiver notes where needed): ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ocfs2 This one is fine, per earlier discussion in the bug. ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/o2cb ocfs2-tools.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/o2cb This script is a bit terrifying... Can you elaborate a bit on what this one does and why it also needs to be on by default? ocfs2-tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not a problem. * Meets Package Naming Guidelines * spec file name matches %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec * The package meets the Packaging Guidelines * open-source compatible license and meets fedora legal reqs (GPLv2) * License field in spec matches actual license * Includes text of license(s) in its own file, file in %doc * spec file legible and in American English * sources used match the upstream source, as provided in spec URL. Verify with md5sum (if no upstream URL, source creation method must be documented and can be verified using diff). * produces binary rpms on at least one arch (tested f8/x86_64) * No ExcludeArch * BuildRequires are sane * no locales * no shared libs * not relocatable * package owns all directories it creates * no duplicates in %files * Permissions on %files sane * %clean includes rm -rf %{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT * macros used consistently * package contains code * No need for docs sub-package * files in %doc aren't required for package to work * Header files in -devel package * Static libs present, explained, and packaged in accordance with the guidelines * package Reqs: pkgconfig if pkgconfig(.pc) files present * no versioned libs * -devel packages requires base package NVR * no libtool archives * GUI app (ocfs2console), includes a %{name}.desktop file, installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section * doesn't own files or folders other package own * %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT * filenames in packages are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items (not absolutely mandatory, but highly encouraged) * package should build in mock: built in f8/x86_64 mock chroot * package should build on all supported architectures: only tested x86_64 myself * package should function as expected: untested by me, but I assume it does * scriptlets are sane * subpackages other than -devel require the base package using a fully versioned dependency * pkgconfig files in -devel pkg So basically, just the two little things on the spec side, and a bit more explanation of the o2cb initscript, and I'm prepared to approve the package and do the whole sponsor thing. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 18:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221843.m1MIh9gD002018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-22 13:43 EST ------- I discussed license with upstream and he says he's going to resolve it in the tarball soon. In the meantime, I'm building it in Fedora 8 and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 19:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433223] Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221900.m1MJ0Lsb005342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gstreamermm - C++ wrapper for GStreamer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433223 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2008-02-22 14:00 EST ------- New upstream version with lots of bug fixes: Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gstreamermm-0.9.4-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gstreamermm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 19:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221906.m1MJ6fZg023775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 agospoda at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |rawhide Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From agospoda at redhat.com 2008-02-22 14:06 EST ------- Nope, no reason. Thanks for reminding me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 19:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221932.m1MJWtGB011910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 amcnabb at mcnabbs.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amcnabb at mcnabbs.org ------- Additional Comments From amcnabb at mcnabbs.org 2008-02-22 14:32 EST ------- In my opinion, this whole thing has been approached from the wrong perspective. When Fedora 8 was released, the Unison package was version 2.13. Until Fedora 9 is released, Unison 2.13 should still be the default version. The additional package should be unison2.27. People expect things to break when they upgrade from Fedora 8 to Fedora 9, but they don't expect things to randomly break when they check for updates to Fedora 8. By the way, if people wanted 2.27 so badly, why couldn't they just do --enablerepo=development? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 19:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802221959.m1MJxFcZ001653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-02-22 14:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) OK. Then do not restore user's original menu (remove the for ... done section from the spec). However, keeping gnome-menu-extended.desktop in ~/.local/share/applications after removing what it is supposed to launch is not a good idea. These two commands do no harm but leaving unusable launchers in user's menu do: rm -f /home/*/.local/share/applications/%{name}.desktop rm -f /root/.local/share/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 20:07:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222007.m1MK7388003598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-22 15:07 EST ------- freefem++-2.24-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 20:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222006.m1MK66lG018865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pertusus at free.fr) | ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-22 15:06 EST ------- Yes, you are right. Could also be Obsoletes: tetex-lineno = 4.41 Provides: tetex-lineno = 4.42 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 20:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222020.m1MKKwjo021702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-22 15:20 EST ------- Andrew, Yes, I totally agree. However, it doesn't seem like discussion on Fedora-devel was moving in the direction of making plain old "unison" continue to be 2.13, hence I'm trying to get 2.13 back into F8 ASAP. FYI, my long term goals would be a situation as follows: For *all* versions of Unison, there will be a "versioned" package unison2.13, unison2.27 etc. There will also be an "unversioned" or "meta" package representing the moving latest version. This main unison package could contain nothing but the following symlink that moves based on latest version: /usr/bin/unison -> /usr/bin/unison-${version} and a Requires ensuring that the relevant "versioned" package is installed. This allows all of: * People can ensure a specific version is installed by installing the versioned package, with no special cases for whatever the latest version is (since there will be a versioned package for the latest version too) * People only interested in interoperability with other Fedora installations at the same release level can simply install "unison" and have it upgrade whenever (this still allows us to implement whatever policy we want regarding when to point this "meta"-package at new versions.) * People can have N different specific versions installed too, for interoperability with multiple other systems. The only issue I see is that if somebody installs plain "unison", and this gets upgraded, then the old "versioned" package will get left behind. Perhaps the main unversioned package should just have a copy of the latest app, and not be a symlink/requires; that would solve this at the potential expense of having two copies of the latest if explicit versioned packages are installed. Perhaps if there's further discussion of the above, we should do it on the mailing list, so the bug doesn't get full up and distract from review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 20:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222036.m1MKaQZg024374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-22 15:36 EST ------- On second thoughts, I think we should have: unison2.13 unison2.27 and use the alternatives system to switch the /usr/bin/unison link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 21:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:15:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222115.m1MLFVhD032042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-22 16:15 EST ------- freefem++-2.24-2.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 21:40:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:40:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222140.m1MLeD10021143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 16:40 EST ------- What did upstream say the actual license is supposed to be? If a new upstream release isn't coming soon then it might be nice to include the email with the license clarification in the package as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 21:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222139.m1MLdlWT020745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 mark at fasheh.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #295577|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-22 16:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295679) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295679&action=view) Latest ocfs2-tools spec file, with minor changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 21:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222138.m1MLcBDF020551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-22 16:38 EST ------- Fixed the spec file stuff - yeah the grep lines were a total mistake on my part :) New versions of the spec and srpm can be found in the usual place: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-6.20080221git.fc8.src.rpm http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec Regarding the init scripts, the Ocfs2 cluster services are enabled by default because it's quite common for a user to have critical software loaded at boot from an Ocfs2 file system and leaving the services off by default (thus making their file systems unmountable) violates the principal of least surprise, and could actually result in a loss of availability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 21:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222148.m1MLmgIj005330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ivtv- |Review Request: ivtv- |firmware - Firmware for the |firmware - Firmware for the |PVR 250/350/150/500 model |PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 |series |model series ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-22 16:48 EST ------- Okay. So I've read over everything, including both spec files. For the most part, I believe this boils down to a misunderstanding that has simply escalated out of control. Whether or not the fact the two individuals have histories of contributing to 3rd-party package repos that themselves have a history of conflict somehow contributed more fuel to the fire, I don't know, but I wouldn't doubt it... Anyhow, I understand Nicolas' frustration for his review comments being dismissed, as well as Axel's frustration over Nicolas going and submitting his own review. Honestly, I think BOTH of you are in the wrong here, to some extent. Nicolas, I'm not wild about seeing a competing review submitted for the very same package you were already the primary reviewer on, especially given that Axel posted that he was on vacation (though apparently, you were unaware of this). It does feel a bit like hostile takeover. I understand wanting to get the package into the distro asap, but still, it wasn't the most courteous thing. If your problems with Axel's package can be resolved, I think you ought to relinquish ownership back to Axel. Axel, I'm still not wild about your spec file and all the legacy crud its going to lay down on a clean Fedora system. Nicolas' objections to your version are entirely valid. However, they're quite easily remedied in a way that doesn't break RHEL compatibility. Simply wrap those sections of the spec with '%if 0%{?rhel}', which a number of other packages using shared specs between fedora and epel do. The license files really could use renaming too, generic license file names in a system-wide firmware directory are not cool. Pretty sure the license doesn't prevent renaming those files to something less generic (such as is done in Nicolas' spec). Using mv to transfer files from the sourcedir to the buildroot also doesn't sit well with me, the sourcedir should be left intact. Use either install or cp instead. PVR-USB2 firmware is also included, should be mentioned in the description and summary. So yeah, as I've already hinted... Going forward, I believe Axel should be the owner and primary maintainer of this package *if his version can pass review*. My reasoning, beyond what I've already said: 1) Axel submitted the package for review first, didn't abandon it (though it may have seemed like it to the casual observer), and he's still working on it. Abandoned package takeover guidelines don't apply here, since Axel did leave proper notice that he was on vacation (well, moving, actually). 2) Axel basically *is* upstream for this package, and did all the legwork to make it even *possible* for fedora to package it and distribute it. Ripping it out from under him at the last minute simply isn't cool. 3) Axel has also submitted the ivtv userspace for review. It depends on this package. Having the same maintainer for both of these packages only makes sense. Of course, as stated, this is all assuming Axel does address the remaining *valid* issues Nicolas (and myself and others) have with his version of the package. If these issues aren't resolved by the time Fedora 9 beta release hits the streets[*], then we stay with the current situation with Nicolas' package and him as owner/primary maintainer. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it. Hopefully, we can put this mess to rest and all move along with our lives, to things far more interesting than packaging up firmware for devices that are quickly approaching obsolescence. Thank you, and good night. [*] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Schedule says March 13. Suggested changes to Axel's spec in diff form, which would satisfy my own complaints with his version: --- ivtv-firmware.spec.orig 2008-02-22 14:44:51.000000000 -0500 +++ ivtv-firmware.spec 2008-02-22 15:39:12.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %define version_enc 2.06.039 %define version_dec 2.02.023 -Summary: Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series +Summary: Firmware for the Hauppauge PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series Name: ivtv-firmware Version: 20070217 Release: 16 @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-enc < %{version_enc} Provides: %{name}-enc = %{version_enc} %description -This package contains the firmware for WinTV PVR 250/350/150/500 cards. +This package contains the firmware for Hauppauge WinTV PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 cards. %prep %setup -q -c @@ -31,10 +31,15 @@ This package contains the firmware for W rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/lib/firmware -mv *.fw %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ -mv v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg -mv license-*.txt %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ +cp -p *.fw %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/ +cp -p v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg +# license requires that the licenses go in the same place as the firmware +for f in license-*.txt +do + cp -p $f %{buildroot}/lib/firmware/%{name}-$f +done +%if 0%{?rhel} # compatibility firmware locations for dir in %{_sysconfdir}/firmware %{_libdir}/hotplug/firmware /lib/modules; do mkdir -p %{buildroot}$dir @@ -47,16 +52,19 @@ ln -s /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg ln -s /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-enc.fw %{buildroot}/lib/modules/ivtv-fw-enc.bin ln -s /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-dec.fw %{buildroot}/lib/modules/ivtv-fw-dec.bin ln -s /lib/firmware/v4l-cx25840.fw %{buildroot}/lib/modules/HcwMakoA.ROM +%endif %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc license-*.txt /lib/firmware/*.fw /lib/firmware/v4l-cx2341x-init.mpg -/lib/firmware/license-*.txt +/lib/firmware/%{name}-license-*.txt +%if 0%{?rhel} # compatibility firmware locations %dir %{_sysconfdir}/firmware %{_sysconfdir}/firmware/*.fw @@ -70,6 +78,7 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} /lib/modules/ivtv-fw-dec.bin /lib/modules/ivtv-fw-enc.bin /lib/modules/HcwMakoA.ROM +%endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:01:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:01:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222201.m1MM19Tq024672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-22 17:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Regarding the init scripts, the Ocfs2 cluster services are enabled by default > because it's quite common for a user to have critical software loaded at boot > from an Ocfs2 file system and leaving the services off by default (thus making > their file systems unmountable) violates the principal of least surprise, and > could actually result in a loss of availability. What I'm not clear on is what functionality is provided by each of the two initscripts individually. I was thinking the ocfs2 initscript did the mounting of ocfs2 file systems, but I'm not quite clear what the o2cb one does. Hrm, I suppose there's probably some documentation on it somewhere in the tarball, eh?... But if you could quickly explain what each does individually and why both need to be on for all installs, I'd appreciate it and I'll probably just say "oh, ok, approved." :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434583] Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222205.m1MM5XPl025761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces Alias: tunctl-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434583 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tunctl-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434583] Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222207.m1MM7Rjc025952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces Alias: tunctl-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434583 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434583] New: Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434583 Summary: Review Request: tunctl - Create and remove virtual network interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/tunctl.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/tunctl-1.4-1.fc8.x86_64/tunctl-1.4-1.fc8.src.rpm mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/tunctl-1.4-1.fc8.x86_64/ Description: Create and remove virtual network interfaces Virtual network interface manipulation tool from User Mode Linux project. --- Rationale: Since some kernel version write privilegies on /dev/net/tun are not sufficient for an unprivileged user to create virtual network interfaces. Thus they need to be precreated by root, but no tool for this exists in Fedora but openvpn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222207.m1MM72QD008900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-22 17:07 EST ------- Okay, nevermind, I poked at the tarball more. So the various cluster services are first started up by o2cb.init, and then the actual volumes are mounted by ocfs2.init. And all nodes mounting the ocfs2 file system need to be running the cluster services, they can't simply mount the volume w/o the services running. Right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:13:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434585] New: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434585 Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: skvidal at linux.duke.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/flickrapi/python-flickrapi.spec SRPM URL: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/flickrapi/python-flickrapi-0.15-1.src.rpm Description: Python interface to the flickr api -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222229.m1MMTcBU012539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com 2008-02-22 17:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Okay, nevermind, I poked at the tarball more. So the various cluster services > are first started up by o2cb.init, and then the actual volumes are mounted by > ocfs2.init. And all nodes mounting the ocfs2 file system need to be running the > cluster services, they can't simply mount the volume w/o the services running. > Right? Right - o2cb.init is for cluster services and ocfs2.init handles the file system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 22:59:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:59:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222259.m1MMx6OM002216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-02-22 17:59 EST ------- Sorry about the rather excessive tardiness of this review. Real Life can sometimes be a bit annoying. :( Anyway, here we go! Formal review of bongo-0.3.1-2: === GOOD === + Package naming/version is OK. Spec file is appropriately named ("%{name}.spec"). + License (GPLv2) is acceptable for Fedora and matches that of the code. + rpmlint is silent on the source RPM + Builds successfully in mock (F8/x86_64 and devel/x86_64) + Final file and directory ownership is OK, with no duplicates and appropriate %defattr lines. + BuildRoot is OK, and is properly removed as the first step in %install and as the only step in %clean. + Final requires/provides are sane. + Summary and %description are good. The spec is legible and written in American English. + File encodings are OK. + Compiler flags are honored; and parallel make is used. + -debuginfo packages seem OK. + No static libraries or libtool archives present. + Binaries contain no RPATH kludges. + Macro usage is consistent. + Locale files handled appropriately (via %find_lang). + Timestamps look OK. + Scriplets are OK, including user/group creation in %pre and /sbin/ldconfig invocations on %post/%postun for the installed shared libraries. + Web app data is properly placed into /usr/share/bongo. + Package does not seem to conflict with other Fedora stuff. + Properly handles installation of Python module and scripts via %python_sitearch and %python_sitelib. + License is included in the package (COPYING). + Sources match those of upstream: 9e841f0e31667be668d023cc8586a943 bongo-0.3.1-srpm.tar.bz2 9e841f0e31667be668d023cc8586a943 bongo-0.3.1-upstream.tar.bz2 + Package contains permissible code. + Documentation (%doc) does not affect runtime of the program. + Header files, pkgconfig data, and unversioned library symlinkes are in a -devel subpackage as required. It has proper dependencies on the main package and pkgconfig. + All filenames are valid UTF-8 === NEEDS WORK === X: Duplicate BuildRequires: libgcrypt-devel (pulled in by gnutls-devel) X: rpmlint complains a lot on the built binary packages: > bongo.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bongo/logs.conf Please mark all configuration files (usually in /etc) with %config(noreplace) so that local changes do not get overridden on package upgrades, etc. (Wiki: Packaging/Guidelines, "Configuration files") The other complaints are all false positives. > bongo-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This is fine. All the documentation is included within the main package. > bongo-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/bongo-auth/libauthsqlite3.so libauthsqlite3.so.0.0.0 > bongo-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/bongo-auth/libauthodbc.so libauthodbc.so.0.0.0 > bongo-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/bongo-auth/libauthldap.so libauthldap.so.0.0.0 These also are ignorable, as they are just the unversioned symlinks to the libraries in the same directory. > bongo-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Again, also ignorable. The only stuff in %{_libdir} is the pkgconfig data and the unversioned symlinks. X: It includes an internal copy of MochiKit (bongo-0.3.1/src/www/js/lib/MochiKit). If possible, please make Bongo use the system copy, since it's available as a package in Fedora. X: It also bundles a copy of libical. Now that it is in Fedora (bug 426698), please build against a system copy if possible. X: ABOUT-NLS is an automatically gettext-generated file; we probably don't need to include that as %doc in the final build. === MINOR === (1) rpmlint complains about executable source files in the debuginfo: > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/avirus/stream.c > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/avirus/mime.c > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/avirus/avirus.h > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/avirus/avirus.c > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/smtp/smtpd.h > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/imap/imapd.h > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/agents/generic/generic.c > bongo-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/bongo-0.3.1/src/libs/python/libbongo/bongoutil.c These can probably all be fixed with some chmod-fu in the %setup section. Not a huge issue. === NOT APPLICABLE === * Package is not relocatable. * No large documentation; no -doc subpackage is necessary. * Not a GUI package, .desktop file handling not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] New: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/stalonetray/stalonetray.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/stalonetray/stalonetray-0.7.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The stalonetray is a STAnd-aLONE system TRAY (notification area). It has minimal build and run-time dependencies: the Xlib only. The XEMBED support is planned. Stalonetray runs under virtually any window manager. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=462589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 211763] Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222346.m1MNkGrR026372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-22 18:46 EST ------- I am no longer interested in reviewing this. Is anyone else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:51:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222351.m1MNp34P011901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 18:51 EST ------- I have to admit that my git knowledge is a bit shallow, but I'm a bit confused as to how you know what git revision to checkout to generate the tarball when you don't have the tarball from which to extract the git revision. Also, I don't think tare working quite properly; when the package is built, you can't directly access %{tarfile} and even though it's a build dependency, git-core isn't installed in the buildroot when the srpm is built. So the end the package gets a VR of just 0.0.10-0.20080221git.fc9 and you get this in the build log: sh: git-get-tar-commit-id: command not found bzip2: Can't open input file xf86-video-nouveau-0.0.10-20080221.tar.bz2: No such file or directory. For simplicity, I'd just suggest hardcoding the git_version, or even just dropping it from the release (it's in no way mandatory) and just sticking it in the instructional comments. Once I extracted the commit-id from the tarball manually, I was able to follow the comments in the spec to recreate the archive and verify that it matched, although your instructions are missing a "cd xf86-video-nouveau". Now, there are some new rpmlint complaints: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.10-1 1:0.0.10-0.20080221git.fc9 See below; basically you want your changelog entry to match the actual EVR you're using, although many folks skip the epoch. xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-debuginfo.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-debuginfo-0.0.10-0.20080221git.fc9.x86_64.rpm I guess this is unavoidable. Other minor quibbles: Best to start your release at "1.whatever" instead of "0.whatever" to distinguish it from the prerelease case. (Prereleases count up from 0.1, releases and post-release snapshots count up from 1.) I don't quite understand the dependency on hwdata, since this package doesn't install anything into /usr/share/hwdata. Abbreviated checklist: * source files match upstream (verified by manual untar/diff) X doesn't quite meet the versioning guidelines (start post-release snapshots from release 1.x, please) * specfile is properly named and uses macros consistently. X The git_version stuff seems somewhat convoluted and seems to not actually work. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text not included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. ? final provides and requires are sane: nouveau_drv.so()(64bit) xorg-x11-drv-nouveau = 1:0.0.10-0.20080221git.fc9 = ? hwdata kernel-drm-nouveau = 10 xorg-x11-server-Xorg >= 1.3.0.0-6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:57:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222357.m1MNvnMw012867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-22 18:57 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks for the quick review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222357.m1MNvovF012896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 Bug 433644 depends on bug 433638, which changed state. Bug 433638 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222358.m1MNwdXu028231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-22 18:58 EST ------- Imported and built, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 22 23:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434557] Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802222356.m1MNuQgp028070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434557 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-22 18:56 EST ------- * rpmlint is silent * free software, license file not included * follow packaging guidelines * match upstream 8618cf5e6ffb68d0056b9c9cfc8c56e8 Log-Trivial-0.31.tar.gz * sane provides Provides: perl(Log::Trivial) = 0.31 I don't think the signing issue can be solved without upstream using a known key. Some BuildRequires are missing from fedora, it would be better to have them, but I won't make it a blocker. I suggest using rm debug*.list to notice when something changes. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 00:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433312] Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230009.m1N09YFk014986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 Bug 433312 depends on bug 433272, which changed state. Bug 433272 Summary: Please update JFlex to 1.4.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433272 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 00:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431186] Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230011.m1N0B5kh030581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itools - Command line tools for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431186 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 19:11 EST ------- This failed to build for me: + ./autogen.sh Running autoconf... ./autogen.sh: line 20: autoconf: command not found You can now run "./configure" and then "make". + exit 0 which is kind of surprising because the build didn't fail there. Instead it continues until: + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90648: line 36: ./configure: Permission denied error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90648 (%build) I added a build dependency on automake and things get further, but still fail at: checking for -litl in /usr/lib/itl... checking for -litl in /usr/lib/... no library 'itl' is missing + make -j8 make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. Now, libitl-devel is indeed installed, but I'm building on an x86_64 machine so the library is in /usr/lib64. I guess the package will need some fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 00:15:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:15:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430653] Review Request: baracuda - VNC system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230015.m1N0FWTp016311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: baracuda - VNC system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430653 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 19:15 EST ------- It seems the initial links are invalid now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 00:17:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430931] Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230017.m1N0H6Rl031404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kate-ctags-plugin - Plugin for Kate editor to use ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430931 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 19:17 EST ------- Any chance of getting a package which builds properly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 00:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230055.m1N0tE8N022953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 01:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230118.m1N1IVpG026535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 20:18 EST ------- Builds OK; rpmlint has many complaints about the .sh files in the documentation being executable, for example: grib_api-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/grib_api-devel-1.3.0/examples/precision_fortran.sh which, though I don't like executable documentation in general, I suppose are OK as long as they don't generate additional dependencies. (They don't seem to do so.) Also, grib_api-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/grib_api-devel-1.3.0/data/missing_new.grib2 which I guess is used by one of the examples and needs to be empty (although you should verify this; we don't really want to be shipping empty files unless there's some reason for it). You should use a complete URL for Source0; this seems to work: http://www.ecmwf.int/products/data/software/download/software_files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz I note that 1.4.0 is out; did you want to update to it? A naive update fails to build because __dist_doc seems to have been changed a bit. I believe the software is LGPLv3; that's what the upstream web site says, and the LICENSE and source files seem to agree: * Licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License which * incorporates the terms and conditions of version 3 of the GNU * General Public License. although that language is kind of bizarre and they also package a copy of the GPLv3 (and a second copy of LGPLv3 for good measure, I guess) all in the top-level directory of the tarball. Can you check with upstream to see if they intend one or the other? Without clarification from them I am inclined to say that LGPLv3 is correct. The API documentation is about 70% of the -devel package, but I don't think that's big enough to warrant splitting the package. * source files match upstream: 36f31407f0c4aa64991f65f5d362d2b3efd986ea25b0d8f214772b21665a170b grib_api-1.3.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (although some definition of "grib" might be considered to be kind to the users. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. X latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. ? rpmlint has one complaint which may be valid. * final provides and requires are sane: grib_api-1.3.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm grib_api = 1.3.0-1.fc9 = libjasper.so.1()(64bit) grib_api-devel-1.3.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm grib_api-static = 1.3.0-1.fc9 grib_api-devel = 1.3.0-1.fc9 = /bin/sh grib_api = 1.3.0-1.fc9 * %check is present and all tests pass: All 19 tests passed All 14 tests passed * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries are in the -devel package, which is OK because there are no dynamic libraries provided. The -static provide is present as required. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 01:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230123.m1N1NJSM027369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 20:23 EST ------- And it's been another month. I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 01:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 201061] Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230147.m1N1li9K031231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: iserverd - Groupware ICQ server clone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201061 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 20:47 EST ------- It's been another month; closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 01:48:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:48:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230148.m1N1mGmw013699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 20:48 EST ------- It's been another month. Has anything happened upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 04:31:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:31:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230431.m1N4VKFQ028184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 ------- Additional Comments From rolandd at cisco.com 2008-02-22 23:31 EST ------- Thanks for the review -- sorry for the glitches. I just uploaded new packages: Spec URL: http://digitalvampire.org/fedora/librdmacm.spec SRPM URL: http://digitalvampire.org/fedora/librdmacm-1.0.6-2.fc8.src.rpm which should fix both the issues you found: * Fri Feb 22 2008 Roland Dreier - 1.0.6-2 - Spec file cleanups from Fedora review: add BuildRequires for libibverbs, and move the static library to -devel-static. The only rpmlint complaint now is: librdmacm-devel-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation which I think is OK, because all the documentation just happens to be in other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 04:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230440.m1N4ek6S029904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-22 23:40 EST ------- Looks good except the name of the static lib package should be just librdmacm-static. But just three trivial changes to the spec which you can easily make when you check in, so: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 05:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230504.m1N54quq016499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-23 00:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=295663) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295663&action=view) [edit] > Patch to resolve multilib issue > > * As we don't ship libpool.a, the part related to libpool.a > can be removed from dotconf-config.in. > * -L%{_libdir} is always unneeded. > > The attached patch should resolve multilib issue. > When you modify your spec file, please change the release number > to avoid confusion. SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7.src.rpm SPEC File: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf.spec Thanks for the providing the patches. I have uploaded both the patches on the server (http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/) and all the SRPMs also. Have removed all the rpmlint errors and incremented the version. I hope to get this resolved soon.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 05:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432607] Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230540.m1N5eRce007059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432607 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 05:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432607] Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230544.m1N5i5bE022434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432607 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-23 00:44 EST ------- Hmmm, I can't download the files from the scratch build to run rpmlint on them, Koji errors. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 05:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:40:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230540.m1N5e3sw022026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-23 00:40 EST ------- These rpmlint complaints remain: agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc agg.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 _Z8agg_mainiPPc I'm not sure what to make of these. agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformsdl.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 agg.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libaggplatformX11.so.2.0.4 /lib64/libm.so.6 I don't think these are particularly problematic, but the tweak on the CommonRpmlintIssues page fixes them up if they bother you. If I have some free time over the weekend I'll try to finish this off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 08:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 03:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227190] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230811.m1N8Bk1T015344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-OpenID - PHP OpenID https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227190 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-02-23 03:11 EST ------- Brandon, is it possible to have two different versions of a pear package in the system? The latest version is 2.0.1, but mediawiki-openid still requires 1.2.x. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 09:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230939.m1N9dmAa030401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-23 04:39 EST ------- SPECS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/xcalib.spec SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xcalib-0.8-4.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Fixed License to GPLv2+ Remove icc profiles as the provided ones aren't used exept for testing (might be better to provide others profiles, but Requirement seems unneeded as they is differents method to have them, even for non-redistributable ones.) Repackage the source to remove uneeded items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 09:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230940.m1N9eWqm030842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rezso at rdsor.ro Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rezso at rdsor.ro) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-23 04:40 EST ------- CC-ing to Balint's new mail address. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 09:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802230942.m1N9gH6c031092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-23 04:42 EST ------- How about this, alternatives, upgrade path, and all: Spec URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13.spec SRPM URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.13/unison2.13-2.13.16-5.fc8.src.rpm Spec URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.27/unison2.27.spec SRPM URL: http://avon.wwwdotorg.org/downloads/unison2.27/unison2.27-2.27.57-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Unison is a multi-master file-synchronization tool. It allows two replicas of a collection of files and directories to be stored on different hosts (or different locations on the same host), modified separately, and then brought up to date by propagating the changes in each replica to the other. Note that this package contains Unison version %{ver_maj}, and will never be upgraded to a different major version. Other packages exist if you require a different major version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 10:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231046.m1NAkZuO026892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat.com 2008-02-23 05:46 EST ------- > c++filt _Z8agg_mainiPPc agg_main(int, char**) i.e. I believe that idea is that apps using those libraries are supposed to provide their own "agg_main" entry point -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 11:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221717] Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231152.m1NBqp0R019054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: agg - C++ rendering framework, move from core to shared https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221717 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 06:52 EST ------- Indeed, it looks like the apps provide the entry point. Regarding the unused-direct-shlib-dependency, they are for very common libraries, so I think it is not problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 11:54:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:54:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231154.m1NBsuPW004530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ming - SWF output library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 06:54 EST ------- Upstream is moving on and closer to a release, but still not there. I think we still should wait a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 12:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:22:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434614] New: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kurzawax at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/cdcat/cdcat.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/cdcat/cdcat-1.01b-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The cdcat is graphical (QT based) multiplatform (Linux/Windows/MacOS) catalog program which scans the directories/drives you want and memoryze the filesystem (including the tags of mp3's) and store it in a small file. The database is stored in a gzipped XML format, so you can hack it, or use it if necessary :-) Cdcat can store the content of some specified files up to a size limit if you want. (for example: *.nfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 13:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:01:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231301.m1ND1jj0030254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: webalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 08:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi Patrice, > > Do you want to take over this review? As you want. I don't care about being the formal reviewer or not, in any case I consider that my comments have the same value whether or not I am the formal reviewer, and since you take them into account, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 13:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231309.m1ND9hM1031376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |373861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 14:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253571] Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231414.m1NEEXpU027163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-23 09:14 EST ------- He didn't, it's still existing in a quantum state of LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+ :-) However Sylvain did put it on his buglist to clarify it ... http://le-gall.net/sylvain+violaine/bts/?do=details&id=55 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 14:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231439.m1NEdYsC030878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 14:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231451.m1NEpZJt015476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-02-23 09:51 EST ------- Build now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 15:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231502.m1NF2jK7017453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 10:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Builds OK; rpmlint has many complaints about the .sh files in the > documentation being executable, for example: > grib_api-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/grib_api-devel-1.3.0/examples/precision_fortran.sh > which, though I don't like executable documentation in general, I suppose are > OK as long as they don't generate additional dependencies. (They don't seem > to do so.) I agree, but in that case they are auto-documenting the arguments for the examples. And they are set up such that it should be easy to rerun them. > Also, > grib_api-devel.x86_64: E: zero-length > /usr/share/doc/grib_api-devel-1.3.0/data/missing_new.grib2 > which I guess is used by one of the examples and needs to be empty (although > you should verify this; we don't really want to be shipping empty files unless > there's some reason for it). This warning is not there anymore. > You should use a complete URL for Source0; this seems to work: > http://www.ecmwf.int/products/data/software/download/software_files/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > I note that 1.4.0 is out; did you want to update to it? A naive update fails > to build because __dist_doc seems to have been changed a bit. Yes, I updated to the latest version. > Without clarification from them I am > inclined to say that LGPLv3 is correct. It seems so to me too. I contacted them, but in the mean time I think that LGPLv3 is ok. > * description is OK (although some definition of "grib" might be considered to > be kind to the users. Done. > X license field matches the actual license. Done. > X latest version is being packaged. done. > * %check is present and all tests pass: > All 19 tests passed > All 14 tests passed Now one test doesn't pass, I have contacted upstream. I disabled them in the mean time. There are .mod files that are not rightly placed for now, still waiting on the fortran mod files guideline to be implemented. I don't think it should be a blocker I'll do things right as soon as it is implemented. I also contacted upstream for names that are too generic. http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grib_api.spec http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grib_api-1.4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 15:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231536.m1NFaObA008061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500/USB2 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-23 10:36 EST ------- I agree with what is written upper. I will completely release ownership of this package then. (including removal of my spec to replace it with the Axel's one, when Approved). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 16:17:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] New: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-perl4caml-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code Perl4caml allows you to use Perl code within Objective CAML (OCaml), thus neatly side-stepping the (old) problem with OCaml which was that it lacked a comprehensive set of libraries. Well now you can use any part of CPAN in your OCaml code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 16:21:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231621.m1NGLc4x030493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-23 11:21 EST ------- The package is rpmlint-clean except for one odd warning against the -devel package: $ rpmlint ocaml-perl4caml-devel-0.9.4-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-perl4caml-devel.i386: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed I dug into this and found that it is because a '.a' file inside the package contains another '.a' file. 'readelf' doesn't know how to handle this situation: $ ar t /usr/lib/ocaml/perl/libperl4caml.a perl_c.o DynaLoader.a $ readelf -a /usr/lib/ocaml/perl/libperl4caml.a [...] readelf: Error: Unable to read in 0x2020 bytes of section headers File: /usr/lib/ocaml/perl/libperl4caml.a(DynaLoader.a) readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start However the library file links correctly, so it seems like its not a warning we need to worry about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 16:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434633] New: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434633 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-xmlrpc-light.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-xmlrpc-light-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers The RPMs are rpmlint-clean except for these errors from the main subpackage: ocaml-xmlrpc-light.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-xmlrpc-light.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These can both be ignored (bug 433783). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 16:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429593] Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231644.m1NGisU2001387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: podsleuth - probes, identifies, and exposes properties and metadata bound to iPods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429593 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |podsleuth-0.6.0-4.fc9.x86_64 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-23 11:44 EST ------- Now in the devel repos, CLOSING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 16:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231645.m1NGjj3h001851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mono-addins-0.3-4.fc9.x86_64 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-23 11:45 EST ------- Now in the repos, CLOSING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 17:21:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:21:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231721.m1NHLcwU025790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|428925 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 17:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231721.m1NHLaS0025740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|426698 |434635 ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-23 12:21 EST ------- we can't build against system libical yet as stated above. Additionally upstream has notified me that the libical we package is not indeed as initially thought the current blessed upstream (I'll go file a bug to have Jakub update the package). Till that happens and upstream adds support. Request to make compiling against system MockiKit upstream: https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?11133 I removed ABOUT-NLS and fixed the configuration file handling. SRPM: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo-0.3.1-3.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/bongo.spec I'll work on the rest of the issues you pointed out, just handling the low hanging fruit and setting the blocker on the libical vendor change request so we can use the system libical once supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 17:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231730.m1NHUAmm027114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 rolandd at cisco.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rolandd at cisco.com 2008-02-23 12:30 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: librdmacm Short Description: Userspace RDMA Connection Manager Owners: rolandd at cisco.com Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 18:18:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:18:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802231818.m1NIIPFN016460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 kurzawax at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-23 13:18 EST ------- I'm not intresting this package so I closed this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 19:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] New: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xastir.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xastir-1.9.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Xastir is a graphical application that interfaces HAM radio and internet access to realtime mapping software. Install XASTIR if you are interested in APRS(tm) and HAM radio software. Note: rpmlint throws xastir.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/xastir/config/tnc-startup.null this fixes a known bug (http://lists.xastir.org/pipermail/xastir/2003-December/003613.html) so this file is really required -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 20:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232013.m1NKDKEs022797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From jakub.rusinek at gmail.com 2008-02-23 15:13 EST ------- > I'll go file a bug to have Jakub update the package I can't change source AGAIN. It would broke my osmo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 20:42:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232042.m1NKgp1b009060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From amcnabb at mcnabbs.org 2008-02-23 15:42 EST ------- Stephen, I like this approach much better. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 20:55:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432607] Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232055.m1NKtTiJ029714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmid - A midi/karaoke player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432607 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-23 15:55 EST ------- New scratch build (the old files seems to be deleted): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=464604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 21:34:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232134.m1NLYCKM017384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-23 16:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > > I'll go file a bug to have Jakub update the package > > I can't change source AGAIN. It would broke my osmo. One package should not be a major hindrance, additionally citadel if based on freeassociations implementation so the porting effort is hopefully small. I would be happy to attempt to port the app should any problems occur. At any rate, a more in-depth argument for switching has been posted in the bug report which I urge you to read and follow up on there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 21:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232155.m1NLtE8w007402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 16:55 EST ------- This should certainly be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232305.m1NN5pKV018812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-23 18:05 EST ------- The latest version seems to be 3.6.3, although there was no announcement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 275491] Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232324.m1NNOg4T002577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-23 18:24 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pgocaml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pgocaml-0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Feb 23 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.9-3 - Check it builds with OCaml 3.10.1 - Only keep license file in main package. - Clarify license is LGPLv2 with exceptions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:27:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 275491] Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232327.m1NNRWgS021936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-23 18:27 EST ------- This package is rpmlint-clean except for: $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-pgocaml-0.9-3.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-pgocaml.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This error can be ignored (bug 433783). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 275491] Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232325.m1NNPiBp003047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:29:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:29:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232329.m1NNTev9022097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-23 18:29 EST ------- Any idea when a new upstream official release might be out? When one comes along I'll produce a new Fedora package for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232330.m1NNUCnj022483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232330.m1NNUurB022662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232330.m1NNUn4J003819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:31:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434633] Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232331.m1NNV3N3003858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434633 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Feb 23 23:34:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429112] Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802232334.m1NNYNg8004225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pigment-python - Python bindings to the Pigment Media Center Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429112 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge.| |net) | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-02-23 18:34 EST ------- Rebuilding for devel now, sorry. Once further tested, I'll also update pigment on the other current branches, in order to rebuild pigment-python, and be able to update elisa at last (bug #429590). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 04:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:22:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802240422.m1O4Mwun003865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-23 23:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 04:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:56:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802240456.m1O4uQC7022790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-23 23:56 EST ------- Updated http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar.spec http://izhar.fedorapeople.org/itl/minbar-0.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 09:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802240926.m1O9QWpw015655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-24 04:26 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Test-Distribution New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: pertusus cweyl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 09:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802240946.m1O9kIwt018916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-24 04:46 EST ------- Chris accepted my offer to be EPEL maintainer by mail, maybe he should confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 13:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241311.m1ODBePU019314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 14:07:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241407.m1OE7MW3028255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 09:07 EST ------- For 1.0.13-4: * Source tarball - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what is written as %Source: ---------------------------------------------------------- -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 197993 2006-01-27 23:03 dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 200442 2008-02-23 12:58 dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz ---------------------------------------------------------- * rpmlint Please check your rpms by rpmlint again? ---------------------------------------------------------- dotconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf dotconf.src: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. dotconf.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dotconf-1.0.13/AUTHORS dotconf.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf dotconf.i386: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. dotconf.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0,13.4 1.0.13-4.fc9 ---------------------------------------------------------- Summary: - Summary must begin with capital letter. Also, please change the Summary "dot.conf". This Summary description is not useful. - description-line-too-long: ---------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long description-line-too-long : Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ---------------------------------------------------------- - AUTHORS file is not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the encoding to UTF-8. - The EVR (epoch-version-release) in %changelog is not right. ---------------------------------------------------------- * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia 1.0.13-4 - Applied patch macro * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia 1.0.13-3 ---------------------------------------------------------- Also please insert one line between each %changelog entry. This is useful for Fedora's CVS system. Then, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 14:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434691] New: Review Request: ocaml-postgresql - OCaml library for accessing PostreSQL databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434691 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-postgresql - OCaml library for accessing PostreSQL databases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-postgresql.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-postgresql-1.7.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for accessing PostreSQL databases This package is rpmlint-clean except for this warning: ocaml-postgresql<*>: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions which I think is an error in rpmlint (bug 434690). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 14:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431188] Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241444.m1OEiIA9001500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: minbar - Athan call and prayer times notification software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431188 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 09:44 EST ------- For 0.2.1-4: * sed usage ------------------------------------------------------- cat %{name}.desktop.in |sed "s|Utility;Utility;|Utility;|" > %{name}.desktop.tmp mv %{name}.desktop.tmp %{name}.desktop.in ------------------------------------------------------- - You can use -i (in place) option. ------------------------------------------------------- sed -i -e "s|\(Utility;\)\1|\1|" %{name}.desktop.in ------------------------------------------------------- * macros - As I said in the previous comments, please replace all /usr/bin with %{_bindir}. ------------------------------------------------------- if [ -x /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor fi ------------------------------------------------------- * scriptlet - As I said in the previous comments the scriptlets for GTK+ icon cache are not yet right. Please refer to the section "GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets again. * Documents - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 14:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430366] Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241452.m1OEqinZ017990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Aqualung - media player with native jack support ans ladspa support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430366 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 09:52 EST ------- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 14:56:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241456.m1OEuD5u003821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 09:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > * Pre-rebuilt binaries > > - To make it sure that omegat is built from all free and > > legally-compatible sources, please remove all pre-rebuilt > > binaries (like *.jar) first at %prep like: > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > %prep > > %setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version} > > find . -name \*.jar -exec rm {} . \; > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > ups. Seems this is an stopping bug for me. I should investigate for fixing this :-/ If you resolved this issue, please upload a new srpm (with release number changed) again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 15:17:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241517.m1OFHYdi007322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 Bug 428925 depends on bug 434635, which changed state. Bug 434635 Summary: Using incorrect upstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434635 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 15:22:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241522.m1OFMcXU008224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 Bug 428925 depends on bug 434635, which changed state. Bug 434635 Summary: Using incorrect upstream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434635 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 15:36:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241536.m1OFaO8Y025376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 10:36 EST ------- Well, * Why do you want to split -data, -doc subpackages although anyremote requires those subpackages? * Please remove Redundant Requires/BuildRequires - Why do you want to write the following Requires? coreutils binutils (is binutils really needed?) bash gawk bc (is bc really needed?) uucp (is uucp really needed?) - Requires: bluez-libs should be removed. These library dependency should be automatically added to binary rpms by rpmbuild. * Also please remove redundant BuildRequires. - gcc - glibc-headers - make (please check "Exceptions" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) * On the other hands, at least some BuildRequries are missing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=466056 * Please consider to use %configure (check what %configure does by $ rpm --eval %configure) * Stripping the rebuilt binaries by yourself is forbidden to create -debuginfo rpm correctly * For man files, please use %{_mandir}/ * Please make it sure that all directories created when installing a rpm are owned by the rpm. For example, the directory %{_datadir}/%{name} is not owned by any package. * Document files should usually be installed under %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}, not %{_datadir}/%{name}. * To make it sure that all installed files are correctly built from open source files, we do not allow to install pre-compiled files (like .jar files) directly. So - If .jar files are needed, please rebuild it from sources. - Otherwise please don't install .jar files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 16:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434698] New: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: i at stingr.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://stingr.net/reviews/md5deep.spec SRPM URL: http://stingr.net/reviews/md5deep-2.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is md5deep, a set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes, or message digests, for any number of files while optionally recursively digging through the directory structure. It can also take a list of known hashes and display the filenames of input files whose hashes either do or do not match any of the known hashes. This version supports MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256, Tiger, and Whirlpool hashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 16:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434699] New: Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434699 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-mysql.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-mysql-1.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases This package is rpmlint-clean except for this warning: ocaml-mysql<*>: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions which seems to be a bug in rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 16:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434699] Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241659.m1OGxO5C006169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434699 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-24 11:59 EST ------- See: rpmlint bug 434690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434699] Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241702.m1OH2jSP007152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434699 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:22:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241722.m1OHM26q010241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-02-24 12:22 EST ------- Bumped to jruby 1.1rc2. New URLs: Spec: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/jruby.spec SRPM: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/jruby-1.1-0.4.20080216svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433418] Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241727.m1OHRT8X028653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librdmacm - Userspace RDMA Connection Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433418 rolandd at cisco.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rolandd at cisco.com 2008-02-24 12:27 EST ------- Successfully built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:33:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433915] Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241733.m1OHX9v2011815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org 2008-02-24 12:33 EST ------- Clearing fedora-review=?. I misremembered, and thought that was the "request review" value. Also, I was hoping Gerard would review this, but he hasn't, yet at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241734.m1OHYMa9029500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-24 12:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > * autogen-manuals > - new autogen package should "obsolete" this package. Fixed. > ? BR: chrpath > - Well, would you try to remove rpath by not using chrpath? > ("Removing Rpath" of > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > Using chrpath should be considered as a last resort.. + there is no --disable-rpath option in configure + using sed to modify libtool as shown in Wiki causes build failure Is it worth trying to modify the code/Makefiles as mentioned in the Wiki? I did not try it because they say it is "not always easy or sane to do". > * License tag > (See License-check.log) > - Actually as %{_includedir}/autoopts/options.h (and so on) > is LGPLv3+, "BSD or" part must be deleted. Changed dual licensing of autogen-libopts-devel by dropping BSD. > * defattr > - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed. > * pkgconfig file > - Well, autoopts.pc file contains > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 11 ldopts="-Wl,-R" > 25 Libs: -Wl,-R/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lopts > ------------------------------------------------------------- > "-Wl,-R" sets rpath and this must be deleted. Fixed. > ! multilib conflict > - autoopts/autoopts-config.in contains > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 20 libdir="@libdir@" > ------------------------------------------------------------- > or so, which differs between on 32bit arch and on 64bit arch. > So this causes multilib conflict. Please try to resolve this > conflict. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks Ok. However, some pkgconfig files (eg., cairo.pc) have: [...] libdir=/usr/lib64 [...] Libs: -L${libdir} -lcairo [...] Since the above write-up is a draft, I just want to confirm from you. > * Undefined non weak symbols > - libguileopts.so has undefined non-weak symbols Fixed. > * scriptlets > - For /sbin/install-info, for some reason Fedora requests > to use Fixed. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen-5.9.4-3.fc8.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=466283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:43:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241743.m1OHh9T6031052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 17:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434703] New: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sqlite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sqlite-0.23.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases This package is rpmlint-clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:09:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434704] Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241809.m1OI9R0M017674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434704 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434704] New: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434704 Summary: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocamldsort.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocamldsort-0.14.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Dependency sorter for OCaml source files This package is rpmlint-clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241812.m1OICima018347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 13:12 EST ------- I have not checked this yet, however I just write some comments (In reply to comment #12) > > ? BR: chrpath > > - Well, would you try to remove rpath by not using chrpath? > > ("Removing Rpath" of > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines ) > > Using chrpath should be considered as a last resort.. > > + there is no --disable-rpath option in configure > + using sed to modify libtool as shown in Wiki causes build failure > > Is it worth trying to modify the code/Makefiles as mentioned in the Wiki? I did > not try it because they say it is "not always easy or sane to do". - Actually ------------------------------------------------------------------ make %{__smp_mflags} LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool ------------------------------------------------------------------ removed rpath as expected (please check the result of http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=466340 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=466331 ) > > > * License tag > > (See License-check.log) > > - Actually as %{_includedir}/autoopts/options.h (and so on) > > is LGPLv3+, "BSD or" part must be deleted. > > Changed dual licensing of autogen-libopts-devel by dropping BSD. - Also the license of autogen-libopts should be changed to just LGPLv3+ as the libraries in -libopts uses the header files in issue. > > ! multilib conflict > > - autoopts/autoopts-config.in contains > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > 20 libdir="@libdir@" > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > or so, which differs between on 32bit arch and on 64bit arch. > > So this causes multilib conflict. Please try to resolve this > > conflict. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks > > Ok. However, some pkgconfig files (eg., cairo.pc) have: > [...] > libdir=/usr/lib64 > [...] > Libs: -L${libdir} -lcairo > [...] > > Since the above write-up is a draft, I just want to confirm from you. - pkgconfig files are no problems because they uses different directories between 32 bits <-> 64 bits (%{_libdir}/pkgconfig, not /usr/lib/pkgconfig). On the other hand it must be checked that 64 bits pkgconfig file does not use /usr/lib but uses /usr/lib64 correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 346121] Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241817.m1OIHUSO019108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: malaga - Programming language for modelling of language-dependent grammatical information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346121 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi 2008-02-24 13:17 EST ------- I have finally patched the Makefile.in of this package so that the executables are linked against the library, this is something Mamoru Tasaka pointed out in the review. The patch is in malaga-7.11-3.fc9, I'll send it upstream if it doesn't seem to cause any bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241837.m1OIbRti022692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:36:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434706] New: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-type-conv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-type-conv-1.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml base library for type conversion There are a few rpmlint warnings, but none seem to be real problems: $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ocaml-type-conv-1.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm ocaml-type-conv.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions See bug 434690 $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-type-conv-1.3.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-type-conv.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions See bug 434690 ocaml-type-conv.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-type-conv.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib See bug 433783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241840.m1OIe9hs023258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 jnovy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 18:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241840.m1OIeA1E023282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226488, which changed state. Bug 226488 Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241900.m1OJ0nPV011651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |434707 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241900.m1OJ0m5d011630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |434706 Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:04:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434707] Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241904.m1OJ4lLs026972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434707] New: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sexplib - OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm ocaml-sexplib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions See bug 434690 $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-sexplib-3.5.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-sexplib.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions ocaml-sexplib.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-sexplib.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib See bug 433783 $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-sexplib-devel-3.5.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-sexplib-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:07:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434704] Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241907.m1OJ7THr013081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamldsort - Dependency sorter for OCaml source files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434704 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434699] Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241906.m1OJ6IOi012880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-mysql - OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434699 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434706] Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241904.m1OJ4qCi012281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-type-conv - OCaml base library for type conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434706 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241906.m1OJ6xiM012976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241906.m1OJ67co012837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241907.m1OJ7LqG013052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 275491] Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241906.m1OJ6fnw012927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pgocaml - OCaml library for type-safe access to PostgreSQL databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275491 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:07:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434633] Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241907.m1OJ7CZX013013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434633 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241906.m1OJ6UOd027605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:11:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241911.m1OJBHeZ028632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-24 14:11 EST ------- My comment 9 NB. The remaining rpmlint warnings are all bogus because it doesn't know that *.cmi and *.cma files are really binaries. is wrong, but it's not a problem in the package. See bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 19:26:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802241926.m1OJQwsM016324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-24 14:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > make %{__smp_mflags} LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool The Wiki does not mention this method, although I have seen it before. :-) Is this preferred above using chrpath? I am asking because if it is so, then I need to fix some of my existing packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 21:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434713] New: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080224-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics This package is completely rpmlint-clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 21:30:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242130.m1OLUTnP018741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter at gmail.com 2008-02-24 16:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Because of the ExcludeArch you should also create a bug to track this issue and > make it block FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64=238953, see e.g. #309191. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434700 Nant is not yet in rawhide so I am unable to build this in rawhide yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434711 Will close once I am able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 21:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433012] Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242157.m1OLv6S6008325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cloudy - Spectral synthesis code to simulate conditions in interstellar matter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433012 sergio.pasra at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:07:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242207.m1OM7BUG024639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-24 17:07 EST ------- Arlizo> Sorry, I've just forgotten to upload the right spec file, it's the correct one now. I've also erased the for...done section. Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242222.m1OMMdMJ027083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-02-24 17:22 EST ------- + source files match upstream + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + debuginfo package looks complete. + rpmlint is silent. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. - no duplicates in %files. warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/BUGS.TXT warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/OGL_sm.gif warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/cyclo.gif warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/linux.gif warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/manual.html warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/shot2.gif warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/shot3.gif warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openuniverse/docs/title.gif + file permissions are appropriate. + scriptlets are ok. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + GUI app. It includes a desktop file and it's properly installed (but the icon it's missing, is that intended?) So, please fix the duplicated entries in files and the package it's approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:26:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 283951] Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242226.m1OMQreh013305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: log4net - A .NET framework for logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=283951 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-24 17:26 EST ------- nant existed in devel for i386 and x86_64, but few minutes after you tried to build log4net in devel nant was updated and built also for ppc :-) Also increase the revision for devel to 3 as you have done for F-8 and F-7 to keep the upgrade path working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242229.m1OMT35M027981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-24 17:29 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV.noarch: W: no-documentation php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV.noarch: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV-0.1.6-1.fc8.noarch.rpm Okay. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with fedora approved license - license tag matches actual license - license not provided in source package - spec written in American English - spec file legible - sources match upstream 10bbee186ed1be7f0d7615446d80bd71 Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_CSV-0.1.6.tgz 10bbee186ed1be7f0d7615446d80bd71 ../SOURCES/Structures_DataGrid_DataSource_CSV-0.1.6.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on F-8 x86_64 - All build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package requires necessary packages for directories it uses - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - %doc files do not affect runtime - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no libraries with suffixes - no devel subpackage - no libtool archives - not a GUI application - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - buildroot properly prepped for %install - all filenames valid UTF-8 *** APPROVED *** You must now demonstrate your mastery of the package review guidelines by doing a review of someone else's package like the one I've just done here. You should try to find a package that has a mistake and point it out in the review if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433568] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242229.m1OMTWAo013570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-DataSource-CSV - Structures_DataGrid driver for CSV files Alias: pear-DG-DS-CSV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433568 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pear-DG-DS-CSV -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:51:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433571] Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242251.m1OMpa44017308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV - Renders CSV strings/files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433571 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-24 17:51 EST ------- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== - rpmlint output php-pear-Structures-DataGrid-Renderer-CSV.noarch: W: no-documentation - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec filename matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with fedora approved license - license tag matches actual license - license not provided in source package - spec written in American English - spec file legible - sources match upstream 69f37de4a299d09babed50d0e8f1caab Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_CSV-0.1.4.tgz 69f37de4a299d09babed50d0e8f1caab ../SOURCES/Structures_DataGrid_Renderer_CSV-0.1.4.tgz - successfully compiles and builds on F-8 x86_64 - All build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package requires necessary packages for directories it uses - no duplicates in %files - file permissions set properly - package contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains code - no large documentation - %doc files do not affect runtime - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no libraries with suffixes - no devel subpackage - no libtool archives - not a GUI application - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - buildroot properly prepped for %install - all filenames valid UTF-8 *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Feb 24 22:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802242256.m1OMuZIF018144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Alias: cel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 chris.stone at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |cel AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 00:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:06:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250006.m1P06oeh011346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-24 19:06 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 00:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250006.m1P06UgO011292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-24 19:06 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 00:59:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250059.m1P0xpRG019912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Alias: cel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-24 19:59 EST ------- I get the following rpmlint warnings: cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libceltool-1.2.so csStaticVarCleanup cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcel_python-1.2.so csStaticVarCleanup cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcel_python-1.2.so csStaticVarCleanup Please investigate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 01:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250113.m1P1DY56022439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Alias: cel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com 2008-02-24 20:13 EST ------- Be sure to include the license in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 01:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250155.m1P1tqI6014815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-24 20:55 EST ------- I can say that using LIBTOOL=%{_bindir}/libtool is more preferable way to fix rpath issues than to using Fedora specific chrpath binary and I saw several people are actually using this method. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 01:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434727] New: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: carl at five-ten-sg.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: The Libpst utilities include readpst which can convert email messages to both mbox and MH mailbox formats, and pst2ldif which can convert the contacts to .ldif format for import into ldap databases. This is my first Fedora package, and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 02:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250213.m1P2DJma031944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 carl at five-ten-sg.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 04:59:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250459.m1P4x7Oo026242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-24 23:59 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). koji build=>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=466864 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7de2637286628510aad586260ebcd2b4 Algorithm-CurveFit-1.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.80 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.85 CPU) + Package perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.03-1.fc9 => Provides: perl(Algorithm::CurveFit) = 1.03 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(Math::MatrixReal) perl(Math::Symbolic) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 08:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250844.m1P8i6Fn015550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-25 03:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit Short Description: Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting Owners: pertusus Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 08:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250848.m1P8mtE0031723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 ------- Additional Comments From ismael at olea.org 2008-02-25 03:48 EST ------- Thanks for your insterest. I'm still have to find the time to fixing this. The good news are I found the work of the packager for other distro who solved most of this things. I'll inform you at the momment I have the new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 09:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432741] Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250923.m1P9N1hB023821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sarai-fonts - Free Sarai Hindi Truetype Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432741 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-02-25 04:23 EST ------- 1. Please update the Fedora comps file (Cf grouping section of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsPolicy) 2. Please add this package to the "Packaged fonts" list at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/Pipeline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 09:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250929.m1P9TVZC024884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-25 04:29 EST ------- Thanks Mamoru for your time, here are the new files. Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1-0.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 09:55:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:55:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802250955.m1P9tgLj012977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com 2008-02-25 04:55 EST ------- Hm, yes, a bit weird that it was not announced. I rebased anyway, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 11:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251130.m1PBUZgM030157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-02-25 06:30 EST ------- I checked in the changes to cvs - you should be able to see it. I did not build it as this is not quite important enough to warrant pushing out to rawhide. So, do we lack anything else wrt the audit package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 11:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 06:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251148.m1PBm7XA017813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-25 06:48 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 12:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432034] Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251221.m1PCLmSE006509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cel - Crystal Entity Layer Alias: cel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432034 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-25 07:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I get the following rpmlint warnings: > cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libceltool-1.2.so > csStaticVarCleanup > cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcel_python-1.2.so > csStaticVarCleanup > cel.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcel_python-1.2.so > csStaticVarCleanup > > Please investigate. I've investigated and it seems that this is intentional, because the files under /usr/bin, do report no errors with ldd -r, so the files under /usr/bin are providing this symbol, strange, but that seems to be how it is. (In reply to comment #3) > Be sure to include the license in %doc. I will do with the next revision (once a full review is done). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 15:54:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] New: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gemi at bluewin.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall-devel-1.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This is a collection of four libraries which can be used to build foreign function call interfaces in embedded interpreters. (needed for recent versions of clisp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251613.m1PGDkvl005336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From dan at danny.cz 2008-02-25 11:13 EST ------- I see a problem with packaging the static library. What is the reason not to build dynamic libraries? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:32:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251632.m1PGWdbi009143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-25 11:32 EST ------- Any reason this is better or worse than libffi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251631.m1PGVgJP024076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-25 11:31 EST ------- By default static libraries are built. However I will ask, if shared libraries are ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430619] Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251634.m1PGYin3009440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Color-Library - Easy-to-use and comprehensive named-color library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430619 steve at silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2008-02-25 11:34 EST ------- The package is built in the development branch. I'm going to hold off building it in the other branches until there's a need for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:39:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251639.m1PGd3bq025298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-25 11:39 EST ------- ffcall has always been part of clisp. At the request of Debian people, it has been extracted as a separate library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251639.m1PGdiY4010512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 11:39 EST ------- Pack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:39:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:39:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251639.m1PGdHfb010451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 11:39 EST ------- Shared libraries are greatly prefferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251639.m1PGduxe025388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 11:39 EST ------- Ignore #6. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251650.m1PGo6tb028033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 11:50 EST ------- Package name is wrong, since this is a -devel only package, a la SDL, just call it ffcall. rpmlint has one error: ffcall-devel-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. Combine all %docs on one line. Add: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig once you switch to shared libs. I'm working on a mock build, but I'll want to do another after the change to shared libs. Otherwise, full review gives no other blockers than the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:57:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:57:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251657.m1PGvHHZ014548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 11:57 EST ------- Mock build/BRs on static version are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 16:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:54:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251654.m1PGsjFX013857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Alias: boinc-client-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-02-25 11:54 EST ------- Ooops, it seems that I've run rpmlint only on the spec file:( All the things should be fixed; the translations have been removed, I'll add them later via specspo as you suggest. Just a remark to this: >- boinc-client.i386: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/boinc-client This is actually a rpmlint issue. The init script used the subsys directory, however its path has been composed from the lockfile's name and lockfile's directory ($LOCKDIR) while rpmlint checks whether there is a string "/var/lock/subsys/" in the init script (using a regex). Maybe it would be enough to check whether there is only the directory path ("/var/lock/subsys")? Anyway I've changed the init script so that rpmlint is silent. New SPEC file and SRPM: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client.spec http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client-5.10.40-5.20080206svn.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 17:35:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 284101] Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251735.m1PHZ8Bj022080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-textile - A Humane Web Text Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=284101 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-02-25 12:35 EST ------- Anything missing for the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 17:40:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251740.m1PHeIH8023042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-25 12:40 EST ------- http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall.spec http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall-1.10-1.fc7.src.rpm * Only two of the libraries are built shared * debuginfo is still empty, I don't see any stripping and the -g flag is also present -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 18:10:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251810.m1PIAfbT011647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 13:10 EST ------- ffcall.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libavcall.so.0.0.0 ffcall.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libcallback.so.0.0.0 Odd. What's this about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 18:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434827] New: Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434827 Summary: Review Request: jcommon - java jfreereport base utility library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/jcommon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/jcommon-1.0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: jcommon is a prerequisite of jfreereport which is itself a prerequisite of the useful OpenOffice.org reportdesigner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 18:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251857.m1PIvU6o019337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-25 13:57 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295827) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295827&action=view) Patch for pkgconfig .pc file to remove unneeded directory For 0.1.0-4: 3 issues * undefined non-weak symbols ----------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost liblqr-1]# rpmlint liblqr-1 liblqr-1-devel liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 g_free liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 sqrt liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 log liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 exp liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 g_try_malloc liblqr-1.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so.0.0.0 g_try_malloc0 ----------------------------------------------------------------- - liblqr-1.so contains undefined non-weak symbols. You can check this by $ ldd -r /usr/lib/liblqr-1.so. As this library is to be used for linkage from other packages, such symbols cannot be allowed because leaving such symbols causes linkage failure. The following fixes this issue: ------------------------------------------------------------------ %build export LDFLAGS="`pkg-config --libs glib-2.0` -lm" %configure %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Unneeded libdir in .pc file - On i386, /usr/lib/pkgconfig/lqr-1.pc contains the line: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Libs: -L${libdir}/lqr-1 -llqr-1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ But no libraries are installed under %{_libdir}/lqr-1 so -L${libdir}/lqr-1 is unneed. Please apply the patch attached. * %buildroot v.s. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Please choose one and don't use both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:07:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:07:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251907.m1PJ7dl7021576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-25 14:07 EST ------- /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh tries to strip binaries only with execution permission flags (0755, for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:17:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:17:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251917.m1PJHejV007913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 14:17 EST ------- So this is acceptable, or should these be manually stripped? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:22:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251922.m1PJMqBe008810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-25 14:22 EST ------- Also, it would be fine to include the static libs also, in a -static package. SDL does this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251923.m1PJNbk3024456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 14:23 EST ------- That looks pretty good... there is a new rpmlint warning: audit-libs-python.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/auparse.so 0775 Might look at making sure thats 0755? In any case not a blocker... Everything looks pretty good here, this package is APPROVED. Feel free to close rawhide. Thanks again for your prompt fixes and answers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251939.m1PJd46Z011971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 14:39 EST ------- 1 and 2 look good. 3. Is this really 'GPLv2+'? My understanding was that all Red Hat authored projects must use 'GPLv2' only. Can you make sure this should be "and any later version" ? 4. Since this is now in the hosted space, can you perhaps add a note about how to check out the specific version of the source used? ie, 'hg clone http://hg.fedorahosted.org/hg/system-config-bind/' Also, there is I think a way to get hosted to have real release tar.gz files you can point the URL to. Can you investigate that? 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 all look good. ;) Can you take a look again at 3 and 4 above? Thanks for the fixes here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 19:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:54:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802251954.m1PJsN5x029861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-02-25 14:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Any idea when a new upstream official release might be out? > Yes: today :-) http://www.cduce.org/download.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252009.m1PK9Hlv018253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-02-25 15:09 EST ------- Ok, these fixes are now applied: http://cdn.verbum.org/desktop-data-model.spec http://cdn.verbum.org/desktop-data-model-1.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 391091] Review Request: snake - a client/server python framework used to support anaconda installations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252012.m1PKC1eO019081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: snake - a client/server python framework used to support anaconda installations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=391091 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-25 15:12 EST ------- Bits are built and in the repos, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252016.m1PKGsOt002355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-25 15:16 EST ------- One last little thing I missed the first few times through the spec: in the desktop-file-install bit, vendor should be set to "Fedora", since this package will be in the Fedora repositories. Trivial fix, just make it before building in koji, please. Package APPROVED. Now we gotta figure out the rest of the pieces of getting you sponsored... (I always have to do some research for this part, don't do it that often). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252023.m1PKNKp4003624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-25 15:23 EST ------- Looks like we're at "Get a Fedora Account" on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join unless you already have one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] New: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sconklin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xnec2c.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xnec2c-1.0b3-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: xnec2c is a GUI interactive application that (in its current form) reads NEC2 input files but presents output data in graphical form, e.g. as wire frame drawings of the radiation pattern or near E/H field, graphs of maximum gain, input impedance, vswr etc against frequency and simple rendering of the antenna structure, including color code representation of currents or charge densities. These results are only calculated and drawn on user demand via menu items or buttons, e.g. xnec2c is interactive and does not execute NEC2 "commands" in batch style as the original does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:49:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252049.m1PKn0HH026779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-02-25 15:49 EST ------- It still builds under mock, run, and rpmlint runs ok One issue must be fixed : you have a duplicate of blueproximity_base.svg (use a symlink) Many lines can be remove : install -d %{buildroot} install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/ install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/ install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/$i install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/locale/$i/LC_MESSAGES/ mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/ ( and modify next line to %{_datadir}/%{name} ) MUST Items: + MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package : Ok + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. + MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. + MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. + MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. + MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. + MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: + SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. + SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. (i686 and x86_64) ~ SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. (not tested on ppc and pcc64) + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. + SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. + SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. + SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. + SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 20:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252059.m1PKxtHI011441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-25 15:59 EST ------- All set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252110.m1PLAdSX014829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-25 16:10 EST ------- please hold for a respin, upstream has released a new version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252117.m1PLH3m6015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 otaylor at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252117.m1PLHUs9015977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-25 16:17 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: Non available OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: Not in the SRPM provided above; source is a 404 Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: - rawhide: - EL-5: Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~408K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Problems with this package: Source is unavailable from the given location, old versions are removed from that location by upstream. Could thus also not verify md5sum match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252127.m1PLRTrn002106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 walters at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From walters at redhat.com 2008-02-25 16:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: desktop-data-model Short Description: Engine providing live updates of online data to the desktop Owners: walters at redhat.com,otaylor at redhat.com Branches: F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252131.m1PLVMi9002993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 16:31 EST ------- Sure, Chris? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252133.m1PLXsDl003488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 16:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252137.m1PLbx22019907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 konradr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|konradr at redhat.com |ketuzsezr at darnok.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252135.m1PLZ93b019321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-25 16:35 EST ------- Here is the latest: Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xnec2c.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xnec2c-1.0b5-1.fc9.src.rpm I'll also request that upstream not delete the old tarballs when they release new ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434861] New: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434861 Summary: Review Request: python-tftpy - Python TFTP library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ivaxer at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://212.193.33.181/rpm/python-tftpy.spec SRPM URL: http://212.193.33.181/rpm/python-tftpy-0.4.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Tftpy is a TFTP library for the Python programming language. It includes client and server classes. It supports RFCs 1350, 2347 and 2348. This is my first package. I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430939] Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252143.m1PLhvI1021307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: desktop-data-model - Engine for communicating with Online Desktop Data Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430939 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 16:43 EST ------- Please use fedora account names in Owners? cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252141.m1PLfbx7020994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-25 16:41 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: Non available OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: - rawhide: - EL-5: Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~408K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 21:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252153.m1PLrLZh007793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 sconklin at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-25 16:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xnec2c Short Description: GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-8 F-7 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:03:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252203.m1PM385j010200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-25 17:03 EST ------- I did a cvs co perl-Algorithm-CurveFit from my top-level fedora development directory. Then cd perl-Algorithm-CurveFit and ./common/cvs-import.sh ~/RPM-fc/SRPMS/perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm everything seems right, I enter the initial commit message, but then: **** Access denied: pertusus is not in ACL for rpms/perl-Algorithm-CurveFit/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsNyKKkD Am I missing something ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252212.m1PMCUCs011849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 nikolay at vladimiroff.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(nikolay at vladimirof| |f.com) | ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2008-02-25 17:12 EST ------- Spec URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp.spec SRPM URL: http://turki.fedorapeople.org/gkrellm-timestamp-0.1.4-3.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Feb 25 2008 Nikolay Vladimirov 0.1.4-3 - Added patch to fix Makefile(ignored optimization flags) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:21:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252221.m1PML60w014000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 17:21 EST ------- From: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure "After your request is granted, please wait for the next CVS sync which occurs every 30 minutes." I suspect you just missed the sync. Can you try again now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252225.m1PMPxpJ014872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 jwilson at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-25 17:25 EST ------- D'oh. This got lost in the shuffle... Just made these changes (more or less) to rawhide, building now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252226.m1PMQ0gF014897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226447, which changed state. Bug 226447 Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:45:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433644] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252245.m1PMjx7t018696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit - Nonlinear Least Squares Curve Fitting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433644 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-25 17:45 EST ------- OOps. Sorry for the mistake... Thanks Parag for the review, and thanks and sorry Kevin for the branching... Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252254.m1PMscCk002144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 17:54 EST ------- perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.03-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 22:56:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433638] Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252256.m1PMucmD002823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-MatrixReal - Manipulate matrix of Reals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433638 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 17:56 EST ------- perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.03-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 23:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252300.m1PN0PiO021370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 18:00 EST ------- perl-Math-Symbolic-0.510-1.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 23:04:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:04:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434557] Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252304.m1PN4hFs004335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434557 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-25 18:04 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Changed the rm. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Log-Trivial Short Description: Very simple tool for writing very simple log files Owners: orion Branches: F-8 F-7 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 23:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433643] Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252303.m1PN3hi1022078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Symbolic - Symbolic calculations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433643 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 18:03 EST ------- perl-Math-Symbolic-0.510-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 23:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434880] New: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jesusr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com I'm trying to take over an orphaned package but I do not have access to cvsextras. I'm resubmitting the package I want for review. Spec URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/tanukiwrapper/F-8/tanukiwrapper.spec?rev=1.26&view=markup SRPM URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/tanukiwrapper/ Description: Java Service Wrapper The Java Service Wrapper is an application which has evolved out of a desire to solve a number of problems common to many Java applications: - Run as a Windows Service or Unix Daemon - Application Reliability - Standard, Out of the Box Scripting - On Demand Restarts - Flexible Configuration - Ease Application installations - Logging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Feb 25 23:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802252356.m1PNuvq3031474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 18:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434557] Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260005.m1Q05C6g001020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434557 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 19:05 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260010.m1Q0AEK3002063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-02-25 19:10 EST ------- Official review for gkrellm-timestamp-0.1.4-3.fc9.src.rpm ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 11381440beb006b4f40399c10606076731e041f9 gkrellm-timestamp-0.1.4.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel, i386 and x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment === Notes === - The package provides a .so, but it is not a devel lib, therefore not creating a -devel package is correct - ldconfig is [correctly] not called because the supplied library is to be used by gkrellm only ================ *** APPROVED *** with the condition of fixing the SMP issue before import ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:21:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260021.m1Q0L6h0018366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 19:21 EST ------- freefem++-2.24-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260023.m1Q0NMPQ019081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 19:23 EST ------- freefem++-2.24-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260021.m1Q0LP0w018475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 19:21 EST ------- pam_mysql-0.7-0.4.rc1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:23:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:23:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260023.m1Q0N71R018961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 19:23 EST ------- mybashburn-1.0.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:23:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260023.m1Q0NOpL019109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |2.24-2.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:23:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260023.m1Q0N9lp018993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - Burn data and create songs with interactive dialogs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |1.0.2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260021.m1Q0LRZM018524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.7-0.4.rc1.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 00:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260026.m1Q0QSVe020723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-25 19:26 EST ------- pam_mysql-0.7-0.4.rc1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 01:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:12:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260112.m1Q1Cd3l031148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-02-25 20:12 EST ------- They should be "chmod +x"ed, that way the debuginfo creation will do the right thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 02:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] New: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/LinLog.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/LinLog-0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: LinLogBook is a highly configurable amateur radio logbook for linux. It uses an sql- database to store its data. For the ease of use sqlite 3 is used but it should be possible to use other databases like mysql, for instance. In testing package builds clean on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8, all resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. This is my first package that I had to include a .desktop file and icon for. Please use extra care when looking at those parts to make sure I did in fact get it right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 02:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434853] Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260213.m1Q2D7xT008871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 sconklin at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 02:30:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260230.m1Q2UsS6030789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-02-25 21:30 EST ------- Sorry for the delay -- with pleasure, confirmed :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 03:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260310.m1Q3AJih005698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 jesusr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 03:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260310.m1Q3Aga8005767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 ------- Additional Comments From jesusr at redhat.com 2008-02-25 22:10 EST ------- I need sponsorship in order to become a package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 03:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218721] Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260323.m1Q3NmRr021879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Distribution - Perform tests on all modules of a distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218721 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-25 22:23 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 03:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434585] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260354.m1Q3ssu0014109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434585 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-25 22:54 EST ------- koji build failed => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469595 with log /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5065: line 30: python: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 04:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434585] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260405.m1Q4586K016961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434585 ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-02-25 23:05 EST ------- Parag, thank you - I've updated the spec and packages here: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/flickrapi/python-flickrapi.spec http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/flickrapi/python-flickrapi-0.15-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 04:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260416.m1Q4GTek018904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-25 23:16 EST ------- Reopening. No one actually did a proper review here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 04:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434585] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260459.m1Q4xjTB006007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - python interface to flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434585 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-25 23:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295872) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295872&action=view) SPEC file needs some cleanups here is patch for that. Still I can see build problems after applying this patch as docs are not built during build stage. you may like to fix that. Not knowing whether we already have rst2html in fedora as this command is needed to build doc file documentation.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 05:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] New: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/dxcc.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/dxcc-20080225-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: dxcc is a small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign, based on the cty.dat country file by Jim Reisert, AD1C. This srpm builds clean on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8, all the resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 05:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260520.m1Q5KQbc028881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-26 00:20 EST ------- how are these command different than currently available md5sum sha1sum? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 05:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] New: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gkriehn at csufresno.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/extras/8/SPECS/xosview.spec SRPM URL: http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/extras/8/SRPMS/xosview-1.8.3-5.fc8.src.rpm Description: The xosview utility displays a set of bar graphs which show the current system state, including memory usage, CPU usage, system load, etc. Xosview runs under the X Window System. This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. Please note that I currently host my own repository (http://optics.csufresno.edu/~kriehn/fedora/repository.html) and am looking at the viability of moving the Enlightenment packages (just under 100 of them) over to Fedora Extras at some point in the future. As such, I am starting with a package outside of Enlightenment (xosview) that I feel should be included in Fedora Extras anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 05:49:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:49:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260549.m1Q5nLGi000562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 gkriehn at csufresno.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 05:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260551.m1Q5pFVD014505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From gkriehn at csufresno.edu 2008-02-26 00:51 EST ------- The actual repository itself is located at: http://optics.csufresno.edu/fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 06:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260611.m1Q6BBdq017749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-26 01:11 EST ------- Oops, mah bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 06:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260643.m1Q6hM2h009793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-02-26 01:43 EST ------- The package meets the guidelines: APPROVED ? /usr/lib/pkcs11 is not provided by anything in rawhide yet, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 07:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260709.m1Q79epV027413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-02-26 02:09 EST ------- Is there a reason you closed this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 07:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:10:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] New: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gmfsk.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gmfsk-0.7-0.pre1.3.fc8.src.rpm Description: gmfsk is a terminal program for amateur radio digital communication modes for GNOME. It supports MFSK, RTTY, THROB, PSK31, MT63 and Hellschreiber modulations. It is used for keyboard-to-keyboard chatting and not reliable packet communication. This srpm mock builds on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8, all resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 08:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260809.m1Q89xYn005167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-26 03:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pakchois Short Description: PKCS#11 wrapper library Owners: jorton Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 08:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433735] Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260822.m1Q8MUk6027279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433735 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-26 03:22 EST ------- missing Requires:pkgconfig on -devel subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 09:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802260938.m1Q9c2if009079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 10:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261015.m1QAFJcJ016473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 10:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:14:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261014.m1QAEvFX028552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 05:14 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK, GPLv2+ Actual License: OK, but source (src/linlog.cpp) says "GPL see COPYING file shipped", COPYING file just says GPLv2 %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: FAILED: No package qt4-devel, but not a target, so it's OK. Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~1.9M) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: .pdf file (manual) included, not very large though: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Problems: The license of the package should be GPLv2 according to src/linlog.cpp, and I can't find any other mention off 'GPL' or 'or later' in the code using a simple 'grep -rin *'. Please let me know where it says v2+ if it is really v2+. Another thing: You did well on the .desktop and icon file ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 10:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261023.m1QANpZH017790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 05:23 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK (although not targeted) Applicable Package Guidelines: N/A so OK Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: N/A %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 10:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261028.m1QASwtO031140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 10:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261041.m1QAf0aV000982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2008-02-26 05:40 EST ------- ad 3. Yes, I'm pretty sure it's ok, almost all system-config tools are GPLv2+. I don't know about any Red Hat policy against GPL >2. ad 4. I made a note to https://fedorahosted.org/system-config-bind/wiki/ on how to get sources and tarballs of older releases. The real tarballs are in distCVS and source RPMs, I hope that suffice, as I would not be happy having to upload each release twice :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 12:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261252.m1QCqjUN023937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(gc at pps.jussieu.fr) ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-26 07:52 EST ------- Is there a packaging problem with cduce 0.5.2? It seems like the file dtd2cduce.ml is missing, so when I build it I get this error: Pack cduce_lib.cmo Build cduce_lib.cma make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/rjones/rpmbuild/BUILD/cduce-0.5.2' make: *** No rule to make target `tools/dtd2cduce.ml', needed by `dtd2cduce'. Stop. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31858 (%build) Below is a diff of the manifests for 0.5.1 and 0.5.2: @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ ./LICENSE ./Makefile ./Makefile.conf.template +./Makefile.macosx +./make-package-macosx ./META.in ./misc/bool.ml ./misc/bool.mli @@ -146,10 +148,6 @@ ./schema/schema_xml.ml ./schema/schema_xml.mli ./schema/TODO -./tools/.cvsignore -./tools/dtd2cduce.ml -./tools/pull.ml -./tools/validate.ml ./types/atoms.ml ./types/atoms.mli ./types/boolean.ml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 13:47:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261347.m1QDl59A001366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-26 08:47 EST ------- Corrected License. Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/LinLog.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/LinLog-0.3-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:03:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261403.m1QE34SS004592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 09:03 EST ------- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261402.m1QE27Vk004361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:11:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261411.m1QEBBa0026770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-26 09:11 EST ------- This project is dead upstream best I can tell. There may also be some issues with how the software works, I am looking for input from some more knowledgeable in the situation. I think this review request might need to be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261413.m1QEDZf1006742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cooly at gnome.eu.org | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261412.m1QECP04006621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261421.m1QELZU9008675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-26 09:21 EST ------- However, I can do a review quickly for you. :) The only issues I see are: 1. The License tag is incorrect, it should be LGPLv2+. 2. You're using a tab separator on line 11, and spaces everywhere else. Since these items are pedantic, and easily corrected in CVS, this package is approved. Please commit those changes. :) Here's the full review notes: Good: - rpmlint checks return: libraw1394.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 11) libraw1394.src: W: invalid-license LGPL libraw1394.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL libraw1394-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL libraw1394-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL Needs fixing in CVS, not a blocker for review. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines (except for license tag) - license (LGPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261426.m1QEQ86p029874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-26 09:26 EST ------- Upon further investigation this should in fact be GPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261424.m1QEOckP029294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 09:24 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: FAILED (logs attached) - EL-5: FAILED (but not targeted anyway) Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~592K) Locales: OK Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Please examine the build log files attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261425.m1QEPfiX009399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 09:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=295915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295915&action=view) rawhide-i386-build-log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261432.m1QEW6Kn031080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-02-26 09:32 EST ------- The release number in the spec file should be set to 1 too just to be "standard" rather than the multi-part "pre" version number like it is now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261439.m1QEdkvK032409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-26 09:39 EST ------- Thanks much, committed to rawhide cvs a few minutes ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] New: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/writrecogn/writRecogn.spec SRPM URL: http://optusnet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/writrecogn/writRecogn-0.1.1-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: writRecogn recognizes east Asian handwritten characters for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK) and will interface to input methods such as SCIM. Unlike some implementations which require to build a huge set of character recognition rules, we recognize radicals of Chinese characters, i.e. the word root of the character, then use a character-structure-based input method to search for the word. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261453.m1QErA8V014615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 09:53 EST ------- Release number is fine as it is now. Guidelines say you should append "pre", "alpha", "beta" and vcs snapshot tags to the release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433488] Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261452.m1QEq1fB014476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433488 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-26 09:52 EST ------- Could someone review this please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 14:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261459.m1QExfXD015878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-26 09:59 EST ------- Correct, it's in multiple source files. Sorry, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261522.m1QFMUPn021020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226202] Merge Review: nspr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261525.m1QFPWDU009950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nspr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226202 ------- Additional Comments From kengert at redhat.com 2008-02-26 10:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Unversion obsoletes for mozilla-nspr and mozilla-nspr-devel. Probably want to > correct this. It obsoletes *any* mozilla-nspr package, because we've stopped shipping NSPR as part of the mozilla packages, but started to ship it as a standalone package. Do you still think a version number must get included? I would have to research which version number was last, at some point before FC6. Would it have to be the exact version number? > nspr.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install > You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the > beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". The %clean section already has a rm statement. I've changed it to use uppercase -R I've added it to the beginning of the %install section. > nspr.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 13, tab: line 1) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a > cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. fixed > There are no documentation files in either the main package or -devel. > If there are none, this is OK, which seems to be the case. find . -type f | grep -v \.c$ |grep -v \.a$ | grep -v \.so$ | grep -v \.o$ | grep -vw CVS | grep -v \.h$ | grep -v \.orig$ | grep -v \.rej$ | grep -v Makefile$ |grep -v \.mk$ | grep -v \.~ | grep -v \.bck$ | grep -v \.mn | grep -v '/\.#' | grep -v \.def$ | grep -v \.chk$ | grep -v \.s$ |grep -vw tests | grep -vw OBJ | grep -v \.cfg$ | grep -v Makefile.in$ |grep -v \.cpp$ |grep -vw cvsignore |grep -v \.mk.in$ | grep -v \.sh\.in$ | grep -v \.pl$ | grep -v \.m4$ |grep -v \.asm$ I looked at all the files this command produced. ./nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README ./nsprpub/lib/libc/README ./nsprpub/lib/libc/src/README These look like a developer oriented quick dump of thoughts from 1996/7, but they don't seem to be worthy to be called "documentation". > The Source0 tag lacks a URL, and I can't locate the appropriate tarball on the > upstream site, so I can't compare the upstream tarball and SRPM tarball. If > this a modifed upstream tarball or cvs snapshot, please include a script that > creates this tarball from upstream. I've added a comment that points to the download directory where official releases are available. Sometimes we do package non-release snapshots. If we do, there is no matching tarball available, but it always will be based on a CVS tag (the changelog shall make it clear what CVS tag is being used). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:37:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261537.m1QFb9Hx012015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 ------- Additional Comments From gkriehn at csufresno.edu 2008-02-26 10:37 EST ------- Bah, no. I don't know how that happened -- must have been an errant mouse click. I've re-opened it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434906] Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261536.m1QFaIXZ023779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xosview - OS resource viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434906 gkriehn at csufresno.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261542.m1QFgWJa013064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-26 10:42 EST ------- http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/gnome-menu-extended-0.7-3.fc8.src.rpm seems 404... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226202] Merge Review: nspr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261542.m1QFgnAR025088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: nspr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226202 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-26 10:42 EST ------- I think the above should be sufficent, once committed to cvs. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 15:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261548.m1QFmSas014433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:26:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261626.m1QGQjLk001637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(iphands at yahoo.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-26 11:26 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261634.m1QGYGc9002999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-26 11:34 EST ------- Well, I cannot see your srpm are updated as your latest srpm has "xmms-pulse-0.9.4-1.fc8". Please change the version of your srpm each time you modify your srpm to avoid confusion. Also, please write the URL of spec/srpm from which we can download them directly by "wget -N" (for example) on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226039] Merge Review: libraw1394 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261638.m1QGcdTh024434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libraw1394 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226039 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-26 11:38 EST ------- Looks good! Closing this one out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433228] Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261649.m1QGnGpM026406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: distcc - Distributed C/C++ compilation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433228 ------- Additional Comments From lpoetter at redhat.com 2008-02-26 11:49 EST ------- Uh, yeah, there some issues with IPv6. I guess I need to fix those. Should be trivial to fix, though. IPv6 addresses need to be formatted a [address]:port instead of just address:port as for IPv4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:54:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:54:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261654.m1QGs3T8027393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Alias: boinc-client-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-26 11:54 EST ------- This does not build on dist-f9, at least on i386. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=471083 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=471086&name=build.log It seems that most (all?) error was caused by missing headers like "#include " or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 16:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434973] New: Review Request: scidavis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 Summary: Review Request: scidavis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://laurence.bernard.pagesperso-orange.fr/eric/scidavis.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://laurence.bernard.pagesperso-orange.fr/eric/scidavis-0.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: SciDAVis is a user-friendly data analysis and visualization program primarily aimed at high-quality plotting of scientific data. It strives to combine an intuitive, easy-to-use graphical user interface with powerful features such as Python scriptability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 17:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261707.m1QH7uBZ009561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-02-26 12:07 EST ------- $ rpmlint scidavis-0.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm nothing $ rpmlint scidavis-manual-0.1.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm nothing $ rpmlint scidavis-debuginfo-0.1.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm nothing $ rpmlint scidavis-0.1.2-1.fc8.i386.rpm scidavis.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyc scidavis.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.pyo scidavis.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/scidavisrc.py >From upstream "The reason why scidavisrc.py is in /etc is that we consider it to be a configuration file (and, to the best of my knowledge, /etc is the standard location for system-wide config files). Like many other config files, it can be overridden on a per-user basis by creating a file ~/.scidavisrc.py. Maybe scidavisrc.pyo and scidavisrc.pyc are not exactly config files; but then again, files like /etc/modprobe.conf and /etc/mtab are also auto-generated." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 17:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:48:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261748.m1QHmF4O016570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-26 12:48 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/autogen-5.9.4-4.fc8.src.rpm To omit unused direct shared library dependencies, I copied /usr/bin/libtool and modified it as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 18:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:10:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261810.m1QIA35d010150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-26 13:10 EST ------- rpm -i scidavis-0.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm warning: user tanguy-e does not exist - using root warning: group tanguy-e does not exist - using root warning: user tanguy-e does not exist - using root warning: group tanguy-e does not exist - using root warning: user tanguy-e does not exist - using root warning: group tanguy-e does not exist - using root error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/nbecker/RPM/SOURCES/scidavis-0.1.2_translations_2008-02-03.tar.bz2;47c455cb: cpio: read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 18:10:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261810.m1QIA1dO020898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-26 13:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 18:21:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434557] Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261821.m1QILIDL012079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Trivial - Very simple tool for writing very simple log files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434557 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-26 13:21 EST ------- Checked in and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 18:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261831.m1QIV4VP025001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-02-26 13:31 EST ------- Could you retry to download it ? It seems the package on the website was bad. It's now solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 18:30:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261830.m1QIUEYN024811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: python-svn -|Review Request: pysvn - |Python bindings for |Python bindings for |Subversion |Subversion ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-26 13:30 EST ------- So...I've been able to make all of the requested changes but one: pycxx dependency. The others were easy, even over-sights on my part, but pysvn and pycxx are very interwoven, in fact pycxx only exists for pysvn (same developer/maintainer, and only went as far as making pycxx so he could get pysvn done). If pycxx needs its own package (i.e. people would like to use it), then I'll look at it. As it is, pysvn pulls in the pycxx source and headers itself and compiles pycxx itself, statically, for itself. pycxx by itself does not have a fully (Red Hat/Fedora) usable makefile and pysvn's needs tweaking for support, and I'll have to learn a lot more about C++ and compiling C++ for use in a shared library environment. I know that in the past, syslog-ng 1.x had a dependency that was included so it could build. What is the policy now? For now (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=471353): http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/pysvn/pysvn.spec http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/pysvn/pysvn-1.5.2-6.f8.src.rpm (do I reset the release version after the name changes?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 19:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434996] New: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mdehaan at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mdehaan.fedorapeople.org/files/certmaster/certmaster.spec SRPM URL: http://mdehaan.fedorapeople.org/files/certmaster/certmaster-0.18-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: certmaster is a certificate distribution system used in Func that we are splitting off into a seperate package so other applications can take advantage of it for exchange/provisioning of SSL certificates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 19:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:56:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261956.m1QJuX7b009934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-02-26 14:56 EST ------- I notice this has been tagged as blocking F-GUIDELINES. Can anybody tell me I'm doing wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 19:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802261958.m1QJw6qP010080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at matbooth.co.uk 2008-02-26 14:58 EST ------- Can anybody tell me *what* I'm doing wrong, even. Bugzilla needs a preview button, obviously. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426884] Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262002.m1QK2O2u032556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-epic - Perl Eclipse plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426884 ------- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat.com 2008-02-26 15:02 EST ------- I assume this is because the Eclipse guidelines aren't yet finished. I don't believe they should be blocking this, but that's not really my call. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:24:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431857] Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262024.m1QKOaS8015466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pakchois - PKCS#11 wrapper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431857 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2008-02-26 15:24 EST ------- Many thanks for taking care of this, Michael and Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435016] New: Review Request: libmmdb - MMDB coordinate library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Summary: Review Request: libmmdb - MMDB coordinate library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb-1.09.1-2.f8.src.rpm Description: MMDB is CCP4's macromolecular coordinate library, written by Eugene Krissinel of the EBI. The Coordinate Library is designed to assist CCP4 developers in working with coordinate files. The major source of coordinate information remains the PDB files, although more information becomes available in mmCIF format. The Library features working with both file formats plus an internal binary format portable between different platforms. This is achieved at uniformity of the Library's interface functions, so that there is no difference in handling different formats. The Library provides various high-level tools for working with coordinate files, which include not only reading and writing, but also orthogonal-fractional coordinate transforms, generation of symmetry mates, editing the molecular structure and some others. The Library is supposed as a general low-level tool for unifying the coordinate-related operations. This distribution is based on the last free version of mmdb, namely 1.09. Eugene's latest version of mmdb (1.10) is licensed under the non-free CCP4 license. Also see: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~keb/cldoc/ http://www.bioxray.dk/~mok/mmdb.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:26:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435015] New: Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Summary: Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-2.f8.src.rpm Description: The ggp4 library is a v2.1 LGPL version of the 5.0.2 CCP4 library (http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/main.html), used in crystallography data storage and I/O routines. This version was patched by Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve to address some of the more serious deficiencies of the older libraries and a GNU autotools build environment developed by Paul Emsley and Morten Kjeldgaard. Also see: http://www.bioxray.dk/~mok/gpp4.php http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/main.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435017] New: Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 Summary: Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm-0.1-2.f8.src.rpm Description: SSM is a macromolecular coordinate superposition library, written by Eugene Krissinel of the EBI. The library implements the SSM algorithm of protein structure comparison in three dimensions, which includes an original procedure of matching graphs built on the protein's secondary-structure elements, followed by an iterative three-dimensional alignment of protein backbone Calpha atoms. Also see: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/ssm/ http://www.bioxray.dk/~mok/ssm.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435018] New: Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Summary: Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fenn at stanford.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/clipper-2.0-10.f8.src.rpm Description: The aim of the project is to produce a set of object-oriented libraries for the organisation of crystallographic data and the performance of crystallographic computation. The libraries are designed as a framework for new crystallographic software, which will allow the full power of modern programming techniques to be exploited by the developer. This will lead to greater functionality from simpler code which will be easier to develop and debug. Also see: http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~cowtan/clipper/clipper.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262031.m1QKVtUU017396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-26 15:31 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-4.3-3.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:30:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262030.m1QKUOLh017045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-26 15:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) >* Why do you want to split -data, -doc subpackages ? To have possibility release them separately. (for example: if only -data package was changed) > Please remove Redundant Requires/BuildRequires OK. Done except bc. bc is not covered by "exception" list. > is bc really needed? Yes >Also please remove redundant BuildRequires. OK. Done. >On the other hands, at least some BuildRequries are missing. OK. libXtst-devel was added. >Please consider to use %configure (check what %configure does OK. Done. >Stripping the rebuilt binaries by yourself is forbidden to create OK. Done. >For man files, please use %{_mandir}/ OK. Done. >Please make it sure that all directories created when installing a rpm are owned by the rpm. OK. Done. >Document files should usually be installed under %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}, not %{_datadir}/%{name}. OK. %{_datadir}/%{name} changed to %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} >To make it sure that all installed files are correctly built from open source files, we do not allow to install pre-compiled files (like .jar files) directly. It is written in packaging/Guidlines: : Some software (usually related to compilers or cross-compiler : environments) cannot be build without the use of a previous toolchain : or development environment (open source). If you have a package which meets : this criteria, contact the Fedora Packaging Committee for approval. To build *jar i use Sun WTK, which can be considered as "toolchain", but it is not open source at all. I need an advice, how it is possible to distribute *jar anyway (Livna ?) because without *jar this project will be almost unuseful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433219] Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262047.m1QKlLGN009911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ganyremote - GTK frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433219 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-26 15:47 EST ------- Updated ... Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/ganyremote-2.6-3.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 20:46:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433220] Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262046.m1QKkTcQ020378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kAnyREmote - KDE frontend for anyremote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433220 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-26 15:46 EST ------- Updated ... Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-fedora.spec?use_mirror=osdn SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/kanyremote-4.6-2.fc8.src.rpm?use_mirror=osdn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 21:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231809] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262101.m1QL1SaN012722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-26 16:01 EST ------- Callum, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 21:02:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262102.m1QL2KDF012923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-26 16:02 EST ------- Fernando: ping? All you need todo is ask for cvs creation, import and fire a build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 21:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:00:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262100.m1QL0ATn022844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-26 16:00 EST ------- ping? Vivek, it looks like Rafael does not have the time for this package. I would like to suggest that we reopen bug 252110 and close this one as a dup of 252110 instead of the otherway around, then I can review your newer package in bug 252110. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 21:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262138.m1QLcUJq030358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-26 16:38 EST ------- Sorry, I've uploaded the noarch.rpm, it's fix now . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 21:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434996] Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262156.m1QLuI1R001381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 skvidal at linux.duke.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From skvidal at linux.duke.edu 2008-02-26 16:56 EST ------- rpmlint certmaster-0.18-1.fc8.src.rpm certmaster.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd certmaster.src:77: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd certmaster.src:78: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd certmaster.src:98: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd certmaster.src:99: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd certmaster.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd and that's from the suse section. otherwise all looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 22:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262204.m1QM4DYx002893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-26 17:04 EST ------- OK, there are a few things that you need to change in this package: * Please don't override localstatedir. This is set properly in the Fedora config. * In the Summary, please describe the package without using its name. Tell me what it does, not what it is called. :) Also, please be sure to capitalize the first word (and don't end it with a period). * Release should not be wholly macro driven, this is something that you want to increment by hand. I strongly suggest that you consider using the Dist Tag system for this, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * We have a specific, explicit system for identifying the License tag. Your package should have "License: GPLv2+", see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines * Please use the %{name} and %{version} macros everywhere that you have "libpst" and "0.6.7" hardcoded (except in Name: and Version:, of course). This ensures a much easier update path, with less work on your part. For example, use them in the Source: field, in your mkdir and mv commands, and in the %files entries. * Please use one of the approved BuildRoot settings, which are listed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 * Do not set Vendor or Packager in the spec file. The Fedora buildsystem will set these values automatically. * Do not use AutoReqProv. This is one of the big benefits of rpm! We want those provides! * In your %description, please don't have any line longer than 80 characters. This ensures that it displays cleanly on a terminal screen. You can have multiple lines. :) * Please use %setup -q instead of just %setup. This quiets the output from the tarball unpacking, which helps us save on logfile size in the buildsystem. * In %build, please replace your long configure invocation with %configure, which is a macro that evaluates to the same thing (and more). * In %build, please use make %{_?smp_mfiles} instead of just make. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e * In %install, there is no reason to check the buildroot before deleting it. Since you've set it in the spec file, it will always be safe to simply delete it as the first step in the %install process. * In %install, replace your long make install invocation with simply: make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install It will achieve the same result, but will avoid embedding the buildroot into the installed files (and is also much smaller). * In %install, you do not need to make the docdir and manually copy the files into it. rpm will do this for you, for any files marked in %files as doc. To do this, just get rid of the mkdir and mv commands from %install, and delete these lines from %files: %doc %{_mandir}/* %docdir %{_datadir}/doc/libpst-0.6.7 %{_datadir}/doc/libpst-0.6.7 Then, add this line to %files: %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README That's it! Same end result, so much less pain. :) * You do not need to have empty %pre, %post, %preun, and %postun entries. Just take them out entirely. * In your %clean entry, please add: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * In %files, please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) * In %files, please don't use %doc %{_mandir}/*. There are two problems with this line: 1. %{_mandir} is automagically marked as %doc when it is used in %files, you do not need to specify this. 2. %{_mandir}/* will cause this package to own all of the created directories under %{_mandir}, which in the case of your package are "man1/" and "man5/". You only want to own the manpages installed in those directories, so replace the line with: %{_mandir}/man1/* %{_mandir}/man5/* * In the %changelog, please ensure the following: Everytime that you make any change, no matter how small or trivial, add a changelog entry, in a supported format. The supported formats are described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b7d622f4bb245300199c6a33128acce5fb453213 * The naming of this package "libpst" is a little strange, given that it doesn't actually have any libraries in it. A better name might be "pst-utils". Normally, I wouldn't say anything, but since I know that you are the upstream, I figured I would throw it out there. If you like the "libpst" name, that's fine, you can keep using it here. I highly recommend that you read through: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines. Please fix the spec file to reflect these changes, and I will be happy to do a review, and sponsor you upon success. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 22:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241487] Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262247.m1QMlei6000982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cduce - An XML-oriented functional language (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241487 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(gc at pps.jussieu.fr)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-26 17:47 EST ------- Here's a new release based on 0.5.2-1. Please don't use '-' character in upstream release numbers! It makes it hard to package! Anyway: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/cduce-0.5.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm * Tue Feb 26 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.5.2.1-1 - New upstream release 0.5.2-1. Here are the rpmlint errors: $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cduce-0.5.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm cduce.src:63: E: configure-without-libdir-spec This is a problem in rpmlint. See bug 433783. $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/cduce-0.5.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm cduce.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib cduce.i386: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/cduce/cduce_lib.cmi See also bug 433783. $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/cduce-devel-0.5.2.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm cduce-devel.i386: W: ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/cduce/cduce_lib.a As above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 23:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262320.m1QNKmRl009399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-26 18:20 EST ------- for #3: I am not a employee of Red Hat, so I can't show you any specific place, but I was told to refer you to "CopyrightGuidelines on the intranet". Is that something you can find? Or does that mean anything to you? for #4: Take a look at: https://fedorahosted.org/web/faq and see the "How can I publish archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project?" You should be able to use that to upload releases and then you can point your Source0: to that url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 23:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435042] New: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435042 Summary: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sconklin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gpsman.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gpsman-6.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: GPS Manager (GPSMan) is a graphical manager of GPS data that makes possible the preparation, inspection and edition of GPS data in a friendly environment. GPSMan supports communication and real-time logging with both Garmin and Lowrance receivers and accepts real-time logging information in NMEA 0183 from any GPS receiver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 23:44:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262344.m1QNiSJL024231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |434349 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 23:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250804] Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262348.m1QNmQhE015991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-Detect - Detects the encoding of data Alias: perl-Encode-Detect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250804 ------- Additional Comments From ralston at pobox.com 2008-02-26 18:48 EST ------- Thanks Ville. Just FYI, I believe I've now completed all of the prerequisite steps described at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Feb 26 23:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802262353.m1QNrwnB017066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-26 18:53 EST ------- Todd: Did you want to mark this with fedora-review + ? Jarod: You shouldn't usually close until it's been approved... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270008.m1R08dsQ029686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide viveklak at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270024.m1R0Ol62023036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-26 19:24 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:29:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252110] Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270029.m1R0TogC024206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 viveklak at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaels at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From viveklak at gmail.com 2008-02-26 19:29 EST ------- *** Bug 227121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270029.m1R0TnDw024192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 viveklak at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From viveklak at gmail.com 2008-02-26 19:29 EST ------- I have reopened the bug. Note that if you are interested in this package I highly encourage you to take over ownership. I cant commit to maintaining packages for the next little while,. I am sure there is a way to transfer ownership of the review/package to you and I would be happy to do the review (if I am allowed to somehow be the reporter and the reviewer..) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252110 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270042.m1R0gLCb004428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-02-26 19:42 EST ------- Yep, I wanted to look back over it before I added the fedora-review +, since it was a month ago that I did the review and my memory needs frequent refreshing. It looks like everything is good. Thanks Jarod (and Kevin for poking :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 00:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270056.m1R0uiWj029807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From carl at five-ten-sg.com 2008-02-26 19:56 EST ------- Thanks! What is the policy on the change log in the .spec file versus the gnu ChangeLog/NEWS files? Are we supposed to duplicate every entry from ChangeLog into the .spec file, or is the changelog in the spec file only for packaging related changes? Yes, the name is strange, but that is the original name of the project, and I did not want to arbitrarily change it. At some point we may be able to standardize the interface enough to create a libpst.so used by the actual utilities, and also usable by other projects. That will further add to the naming confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 02:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270231.m1R2VFwH025976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-26 21:31 EST ------- rpmlint says: writRecogn.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A handwriting recognizer that allows users to input Chinese characters used in Chinese, Japanese and Korean. writRecogn.src: E: summary-too-long A handwriting recognizer that allows users to input Chinese characters used in Chinese, Japanese and Korean. writRecogn.src: E: description-line-too-long writRecogn recognizes east Asian handwritten characters for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK) and will interface to input methods such as SCIM. Unlike some implementations which require to build a huge set of character recognition rules, we recognize radicals of Chinese characters, i.e. the word root of the character, then use a character-structure-based input method to search for the word. This saves us from writing recognition rules for tens of thousands of CJK characters. This should provide better recognition accuracy than current open source handwriting recognition libraries, like tomoe. writRecogn.src: E: description-line-too-long The main program which provides the GUI is writRecogn and there is a commandline character data maintenance program cdMgr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 02:39:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270239.m1R2da9n017502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-26 21:39 EST ------- Personally I would suggest calling it WritRecogn or writrecogn. The mixed lower- and uppercase looks a little awkward to me, for the record anyway. | BuildRequires: gtk2-devel >= 2.10 libxml2-devel >= 2.6 sqlite-devel >= 3.0 libtool >= 1.5 | Requires: gtk2 >= 2.10 libxml2 >= 2.6 sqlite >= 3.0 I think it should sufficient to specific the minimum versions for the buildrequires and then the explicit Requires can be droppped. They are all satisfied by Fedora 7 anyway so not really necessary for Fedora anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 02:51:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270251.m1R2p82M020381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-26 21:51 EST ------- Program seems to run and work ok - I realise it is still alpha at this stage. I just note a warning at runtime though: ** (writRecogn:9633): WARNING **: Couldn't find pixmap file: lightbulb.png and also some debug output (but that is ok at this stage). Also just wondering if it is necessary to ship all the files in "/usr/share/writRecogn/data/"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 03:02:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270302.m1R32scf022827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-26 22:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=296018) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296018&action=view) writRecogn.spec-1.patch minor spec cleanup suggestions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 03:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270301.m1R31vWH032231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-26 22:01 EST ------- Again about naming I would suggest naming the programs something like %{_bindir}/WritRecogn and %{_bindir}/WritRecogn-manager. It would be nice to have a .desktop file for the main program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 03:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435058] New: Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435058 Summary: Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sconklin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/splat.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/splat-1.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: SPLAT! is a Surface Path Length And Terrain analysis application written for Linux and Unix workstations. SPLAT! analyzes point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links, and provides information useful to communication system designers and site engineers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 03:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433735] Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270320.m1R3KCkj026310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433735 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-02-26 22:20 EST ------- Thanks for catching that up. updated: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgcroots/libgcroots.spec http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/libgcroots/libgcroots-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 03:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433735] Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270343.m1R3hbx3008301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgcroots - Root acquisition library for Garbage Collector https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433735 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-26 22:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=472349 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f5fa9b60e506c70a041ef03ab26dbd18 libgcroots-0.2.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + gcroots.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libgcroots-0.2.1-2.fc9-> Provides: libgcroots.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libdl.so.2 libgcroots.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libgcroots-devel-0.2.1-2.fc9 -> Requires: libgcroots.so.0 pkgconfig libgcroots = 0.2.1-2.fc9 + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 04:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270400.m1R40Y3X012377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-02-26 23:00 EST ------- Whoops, sorry, my mistake... Got close-happy plowing through bugs yesterday... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 04:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270404.m1R44KXi004098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2008-02-26 23:04 EST ------- After reviewing all the comments here it seems that Patrice has done a very thorough review. The only thing missing seems to be the "source matches upstream" check which was omitted due to Pat's (understandable) stance on the annoying must-register-to-download primary web site. After registering I can confirm: + source matches upstream with sha1sum: eca618a1179356e2950608da0e9ca210f1caa1a8 ncl_ncarg_src-5.0.0.tar.gz eca618a1179356e2950608da0e9ca210f1caa1a8 ../ncl_ncarg_src-5.0.0.tar.gz + specfile is clean and legible + license appears to be correct + builds in mock on F8 x86_64 Since there appear to be no blockers and since Patrice has already done a very thorough review, I'd like to APPROVE this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 04:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270405.m1R4539p013802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 04:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435064] New: Review Request: midisport-firmware - firmware files for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435064 Summary: Review Request: midisport-firmware - firmware files for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davej at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/midisport-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/midisport-firmware-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: Firmware for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices I based this specfile on the ivtv-firmware spec. TODO: add udev rules to autoload firmware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 04:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270449.m1R4nw1N021771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-26 23:49 EST ------- Good to use make install command as make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" License looks to me GPLv2+ Can we have summary like this? Summary: A stand alone notification area -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 05:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270536.m1R5aJdg020435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(cooly at gnome.eu.org| |) | ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-27 00:36 EST ------- I know upstream seems dead, I know there are certain issues in operating a APRSd gateway but again there are people using this so I think this package will help as there are a lot of fedora users who compile this from source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 06:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270636.m1R6aZV6006980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 01:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > >To make it sure that all installed files are correctly built from > open source files, we do not allow to install pre-compiled files > (like .jar files) directly. > It is written in packaging/Guidlines: > : Some software (usually related to compilers or cross-compiler > : environments) cannot be build without the use of a previous toolchain > : or development environment (open source). If you have a package which meets > : this criteria, contact the Fedora Packaging Committee for approval. > To build *jar i use Sun WTK, which can be considered as "toolchain", but > it is not open source at all. I need an advice, how it is possible to > distribute *jar anyway (Livna ?) because without *jar this project will be > almost unuseful. Isn't is possible to build jar files in this package by using java related packages provided by Fedora? As far as I know most Fedora java packages use ant to rebuild jar files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 07:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:16:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270716.m1R7GrT3005276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-27 02:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Good to use make install command as > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" done > License looks to me GPLv2+ Ok. Changed. > Can we have summary like this? > Summary: A stand alone notification area Sure. Done. Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/stalonetray/stalonetray.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/stalonetray/stalonetray-0.7.6-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 07:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226507] Merge Review: tux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270722.m1R7M6ub006295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226507 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide petrosyan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From petrosyan at gmail.com 2008-02-27 02:22 EST ------- Tux has been removed from Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 07:40:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270740.m1R7e4iq018854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 02:40 EST ------- Jens, Thanks for your comments. Regarding comment #2: The building requires are mainly for koji build, otherwise the koji cannot find essential libraries. Regarding comment #3: The lightbulb.png shows a small icon in "Recognize" buttom. This will be fixed in next release. Regarding comment #4,#5: Addressed accordingly. Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270802.m1R82td3023090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 03:02 EST ------- Okay thanks. Please update the URLs for each revision. :) Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/writrecogn/writRecogn.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/writrecogn/WritRecogn-0.1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270811.m1R8BWpw016012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > For 5.9.4-2: > > * autogen-manuals > - new autogen package should "obsolete" this package. Well, I wrote so, however also now autogen can "provide" autogen-manuals (= %{name}-%{version}). Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (autogen) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270810.m1R8AnLk015895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 03:10 EST ------- rpmlint still says: WritRecogn.src: E: description-line-too-long writRecogn recognizes East Asian handwritten characters for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean (CJK). Unlike some implementations which require to build a huge set of character recognition rules, we recognize radicals of Chinese characters, i.e. the word root of the character, then use a character-structure-based input method to search for the word. This saves us from writing recognition rules for tens of thousands of CJK characters. This should provide better recognition accuracy than current open source handwriting recognition libraries. WritRecogn.src: E: description-line-too-long The main program which provides the GUI is writRecogn and there is a commandline character data maintenance program cdMgr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270835.m1R8Z1Ln029231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 03:35 EST ------- ping? Also current version seems 2.2.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270840.m1R8e9TM021325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 03:40 EST ------- > Regarding comment #3: > The lightbulb.png shows a small icon in "Recognize" buttom. This will be fixed > in next release. In version 0.2? (In reply to comment #3) > Also just wondering if it is necessary to ship all the files in > "/usr/share/writRecogn/data/"? How about this? (In reply to comment #4) > It would be nice to have a .desktop file for the main program. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 for details about .desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 08:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270843.m1R8hAHC031034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 03:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > If pycxx needs its own package (i.e. people would like to use it), then I'll > look at it. As it is, pysvn pulls in the pycxx source and headers itself and > compiles pycxx itself, statically, for itself. pycxx by itself does not have a > fully (Red Hat/Fedora) usable makefile and pysvn's needs tweaking for support, > and I'll have to learn a lot more about C++ and compiling C++ for use in a > shared library environment. Well, then okay for now. So, as 1.5.3 seems already released, would you update the base version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 09:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270913.m1R9Duc0005709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 04:13 EST ------- I think you need to give credit for the zh handwriting data from tomoe (which is under LGPL2+). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 09:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226452] Merge Review: system-config-bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270919.m1R9JYwv030124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: system-config-bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226452 ------- Additional Comments From rbrich at redhat.com 2008-02-27 04:19 EST ------- 3. Ok, I will update the copyright note and license tag according those guildlines. Thanks. 4. Source0 pointing to an URL does not work. It apparently must be local file. In Fedora CVS, it's solved by special makefile rules and lookaside file cache. To use hosted space for releases, I'd need to adjust the common makefile, otherwise the problem with double uploads stays. I understand that hosted releases are good for external use, but my notes on getting tarball from HG should be sufficient... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 09:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225795] Merge Review: ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802270959.m1R9xqsW006253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ghostscript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225795 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-27 04:59 EST ------- In /usr/share/ghostscript/8.61/Resource/CMap/ most (if not all) cmap files annot be modified, for example usr/share/ghostscript/8.61/Resource/CMap/78-EUC-H I am not sure about the code versus content for cmap files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 10:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:32:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271032.m1RAWj2G022626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-27 05:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=472706 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. eebb46182b64d75b89776bbfc867f470 stalonetray-0.7.6.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 10:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:41:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435090] New: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435090 Summary: Review Request: Cython - This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ndbecker2 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/Cython.spec SRPM URL: http://nbecker.dyndns.org:8080/RPM/Cython-0.9.6.12-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is a development version of Pyrex, a language for writing Python extension modules. rpmlint - 2 small warnings mock - pass -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 11:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271109.m1RB9cQb030219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ppc64-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From mohd.omar at in.ibm.com 2008-02-27 06:09 EST ------- I found ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.ppc.rpm empty. It doesn't provides any binaries. --Regards Omar M -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433187] Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271303.m1RD369e021099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boinc-client - A platform for distributed computing Alias: boinc-client-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433187 ------- Additional Comments From xjakub at fi.muni.cz 2008-02-27 08:03 EST ------- You're right (all the errors were caused by missing headers). I've created a patch for this (and also sent it to upstream). New SPEC file and SRPM: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client-5.10.40-6.20080206svn.fc8.src.rpm http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjakub/boinc/boinc-client.spec Koji scratch builds: dist-F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=472787 dist-F8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=471367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:00:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271300.m1RD0QhF020415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 08:00 EST ------- Now this package can be approved. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (xcalib) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:26:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271326.m1RDQLIs026487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-27 08:26 EST ------- > Isn't is possible to build jar files in this package by using > java related packages provided by Fedora? As far as I know > most Fedora java packages use ant to rebuild jar files. No. This *jar is not for J2SE, but for J2ME (midlet, which should be installed in cell phone). Seems, it is a good question for Fedora Packaging Committee, since (IMHO) all midlets are depends from Sun WTK or Nokia/Motorola/.... toolkits (which are not open-source). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271332.m1RDWcL9017553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-27 08:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xcalib Short Description: Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Owners: kwizart Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Commits by cvsextras: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271337.m1RDbNUi028613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-02-27 08:37 EST ------- Done. Updated system to 1.3.3 http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/sawfish-1.3.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271339.m1RDdSh3028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 08:39 EST ------- Sorry, I am not java specialist and perhaps for now I don't understand correctly the difference between J2SE/J2ME. But IMO it is a blocker that the files to be installed cannot be rebuilt from open source method. Would you ask Fedora Packaging Committee about this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271340.m1RDeiRa029405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 08:40 EST ------- Once I asked on Fedora Packaging Committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225294] Merge Review: authd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271344.m1RDi0Z5029930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrakus at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-27 08:43 EST ------- authd got a new maintaner: rrakus at redhat.com. Roman, please try to find upstream and if it does not exist, please create your own on fedorahosted.org. You can ask maintainers of other distributions to cooperate and unify your patches. Or kick authd out of Fedora, if nobody uses it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 13:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271356.m1RDuURg000382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 08:56 EST ------- I want to check this package once autogen is imported into Fedora - BuildRequires changed - Please try to remove chrpath use ! Note You don't have to write || : multiple times on scriptlets. The /bin/sh script in scriptlets are called with "set -x", not "set -e -x", so the exit status of the last line in the script really affects. So simply adding "exit 0" at the last line is okay. http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/comix/devel/comix.spec - About this scriptlet: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %post doc scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || : ------------------------------------------------------------------- File entry of -doc subpackage reads: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %dir %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}-manual %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}-manual/%{name}-manual-C.omf ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271406.m1RE6eGY003132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 09:06 EST ------- As I expected, the current scriptlet is strongly rejected by Fedora Packaging Committee: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-February/msg00094.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-February/msg00095.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271415.m1REFTPY004818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 09:15 EST ------- I prefer to have require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont timidity++ explicitly rather than to use virtual provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:22:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271422.m1REMVWH028042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From anyremote at mail.ru 2008-02-27 09:22 EST ------- > Would you ask Fedora Packaging Committee about this issue? How it could be done ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271429.m1RETMGX007624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-02-27 09:29 EST ------- Sorry, this is rights links http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets.spec http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.0.12-3.fc8.src.rpm http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.0.12-3.fc8.noarch.rpm Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271428.m1RESGV6029328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 ------- Additional Comments From metal3d at gmail.com 2008-02-27 09:28 EST ------- Done... last and final release + some corrections on specfile. Rpmlint gives me: screenlets.src: W: invalid-license GPL http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets.spec http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.0.12-3.fc8.noarch.src.rpm http://www.metal3d.org/rpms/screenlets-0.0.12-3.fc8.noarch.rpm And no need to give +x on python files... Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:42:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271442.m1REg1HS010536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-02-27 09:42 EST ------- Kool. Thanks, updated http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17-4.20071102svn.fc9.src.rpm Hitting one issue though. How do i build "librep-common" for noarch ? Using "BuildArch: noarch" with librep-common yields lots of error :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:42:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:42:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435121] New: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: arbiter at arbiterlab.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/specs/mail/antispam/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://rpm.binaryhelix.org/dspam-3.8.0-18.1.src.rpm Description: DSPAM is a scalable and open-source content-based spam filter designed for multi-user enterprise systems. On a properly configured system, many users experience results between 99.5% - 99.95%, or one error for every 200 to 2000 messages. DSPAM supports many different MTAs and can also be deployed as a stand-alone SMTP appliance. For developers, the DSPAM core engine (libdspam) can be easily incorporated directly into applications for drop-in filtering First package, needs sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 14:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271456.m1REuU1f003131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-27 09:56 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: autogen Updated Fedora Owners: rishi Updated Description: Automated text file generator Updated Cvsextras Commits: yes I inherited this from Paul F. Johnson and everything should already be in place, but just in case... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 15:06:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271506.m1RF6cTS016792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-02-27 10:06 EST ------- Updated packages based on review. http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18-3.20060131svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 15:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435125] New: Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435125 Summary: Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/xerces-c27.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/xerces-c27-2.7.0-4.fc8.src.rpm Description: Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 This is needed for perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0 which cannot be rebuild against xerces-c-2.8.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 16:04:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434614] Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271604.m1RG4XjW018898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cdcat - Hyper's CdCatalog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434614 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-02-27 11:04 EST ------- Could someone review this please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 16:38:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:38:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271638.m1RGcw6c004790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-27 11:38 EST ------- Review for release 1.fc8: * RPM name is OK * Source gnuradio-3.1.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * INSERT RESULT OF RUN TEST Needs work: * Spec file: some paths are not replaced with RPM macros (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#macros) * Build failed in mock --- this I tried in fedora-8-x86_64, seemed like you were lacking python-devel-dependency checking for Python.h... no configure: error: cannot find usable Python headers error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.17800 (%build) (18 checks have been run) Notes: %files usrp %defattr(-,root,root,-) Is usrp subpackage empty? I'll check once I manage to build it; mock builds are running right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 16:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271643.m1RGhZd4005768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-27 11:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stalonetray Short Description: A stand alone notification area Owners: svahl Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 16:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434353] renameutils package not in official Fedora repo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271654.m1RGsLJG030170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: renameutils package not in official Fedora repo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434353 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-27 11:54 EST ------- I don't see a proper package review request here. If you are interested in maintaining this package in Fedora, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Otherwise, I suggest you add your package to the wishlist at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434996] Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271701.m1RH1elx009605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 mdehaan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434996] Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271704.m1RH4q2D010059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 ------- Additional Comments From mdehaan at redhat.com 2008-02-27 12:04 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: certmaster Short Description: remote certificate distribution framework Owners: mdehaan skvidal alikins Branches: F-7 F-8 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdehaan skvidal alikins Cvsextras Commits: mdehaan skvidal alikins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271716.m1RHG9Dv003036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2008-02-27 12:16 EST ------- So far we have not had the need for this. In the interest of cleanup, I am closing this. It can be re-opened later if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:35:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271735.m1RHZ5BV006693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From tuju at iki.fi 2008-02-27 12:35 EST ------- Axel, any news on this? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:42:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:42:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435155] Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271742.m1RHgg47008117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: s3fs - Fuse |Review Request: s3fs - Fuse |filesystem for amazon.com's |filesystem for amazon.com's |S3 storage service |S3 storage service Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:38:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:38:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433135] Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271738.m1RHcScw007216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anyRemote - Bluetooth remote control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433135 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 12:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > Would you ask Fedora Packaging Committee about this issue? > How it could be done ? > Please check: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging Post a mail to fedora-packaging at redhat.com , however in advance it is better that you subscribe to the list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435155] New: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 Summary: Review Request: s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nhorman at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/s3fs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/s3fs-0.4-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: s3fs is a FUSE filesystem allowing users to mount Amazons S3 storage service as a local filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:52:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432259] Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271752.m1RHqXiF020072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: speech-dispatcher - Required for speech synthesis on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 12:52 EST ------- (Just writing a comment that this bug is currently blocked by bug 433253) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 17:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229391] Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271753.m1RHrL79020176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-config-kdump - graphical tool for configuring kernel crash dumps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229391 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-27 12:53 EST ------- I see system-config-kdump-1.0.13-2.fc9 built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:05:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433488] Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271805.m1RI51oP012935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - An easy and clean Day Planner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433488 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnny.d at freesurf.ch ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 13:05 EST ------- *** Bug 222964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 222964] Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271805.m1RI50F0012892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dayplanner - A simple time management program. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222964 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 13:05 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433488 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271827.m1RIRTbj027493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Alias: gnuradio-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gnuradio-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271827.m1RIR16H027422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-27 13:27 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=296101) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296101&action=view) gnuradio-3.1.1-1.fc8 rpmlint Marek, Marek. 1.) Seems like you are missing the following: BuildRequires: boost-devel BuildRequires: python-devel BuildRequires: swig BuildRequires: doxygen 2.) This won't get packaged on 64bits, as your python modules are architecture dependent: Please replace python_sitelib definition with %{!?python_sitearch: %define python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)")} and its occurences with python_sitearch 3.) gnuradio-usrp sumpackage is really empty. Should it be? 4.) RPMLint doesn't like you, see the attachment. These definitely have to be addressed: gnuradio.x86_64: W: non-executable-in-bin ... gnuradio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package ... 5.) You install libtool files which you should have %excluded: For example /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/gnuradio/*.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271847.m1RIlLZe031234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-27 13:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:47:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271847.m1RIl2F8031176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 eric at christensenplace.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us ------- Additional Comments From eric at christensenplace.us 2008-02-27 13:47 EST ------- >From N5JXS Gerry Creager @ TAMU: Several issues have appeared. Aprsd can be misconfigured to cause looping in the APRS-IS, and often is. The javaAPRSSrvr code has been revamped to detect and solve this but we still see hiccups occasionally. Xastir makes a better iGate, and if hams ask AE5PL, they can get the java code for igating or 2ndary servers. I'd much rather see a script to take the java package and make it go into a predetermined area. I'd also love to see it executed as a non-priv user with access to the needed ports/sockets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271851.m1RIpjTt023564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-27 13:51 EST ------- Yeah, everything seems in place to me... feel free to reset the flag if you need anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 18:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271853.m1RIroYb032575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-27 13:53 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 19:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434996] Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271904.m1RJ4nND002547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: certmaster - a certificate distribution system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434996 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skvidal at linux.duke.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-27 14:04 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 19:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802271933.m1RJXsNG032427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-02-27 14:33 EST ------- lftp is in good shape now, however I would use the %{_prefix} macro here: %configure --with-modules --disable-static --with-openssl=/usr --with-debug --disable-rpath like this: %configure --with-modules --disable-static --with-openssl=%{_prefix} --with-debug --disable-rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 20:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:05:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272005.m1RK5max017057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-27 15:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I prefer to have require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont timidity++ > explicitly rather than to use virtual provides. I assume you mean "I prefer to have timidity++ require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont", right? That is what I was suggesting too, appearantly I wasn't clear. Please let me know if you agree that the solution for timidty++ is to require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont, and have an /etc/timidity++.cfg pointing to this soundfont. Then I can do a new version of this package and we can hopefully finish this review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 21:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272151.m1RLpZqk008122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-02-27 16:51 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ncl Short Description: NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics Owners: orion Branches: F-8 F-7 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 22:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:47:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434593] Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272247.m1RMlGLP019400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stalonetray - A stand alone notification area implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434593 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-02-27 17:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > cvs done. Thanks! Imported and built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=473582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272317.m1RNHIMG020515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 ------- Additional Comments From airlied at redhat.com 2008-02-27 18:17 EST ------- As I said nouveau has never been released so the 0.whatever is fine. hwdata depends will be required in the future when we add the pciids, so it shouldn't be any harm now and I don't want to forget it later. I've removed the git versioning stuff and fixed the changelog version. Hopefully it all passes now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272334.m1RNY3xE023875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-27 18:34 EST ------- > How do i build "librep-common" for noarch ? You are putting in "librep-common" a lot of byte-compiled .jlc files. Are you really sure that they are the same for all possible architectures? In any case it does not seem possible to specify "BuildArch" for a subpackage _on the same build_. The same source with two different spec files and building twice could do it. If I am mistaken somebody will tell me, I presume. :-) You would need "BuildArch: %{_arch}" for other subpackages - would be my guess (but that seems to override BuildArch settings for "common"). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435125] Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272340.m1RNemmb025442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435125 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |434487 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272343.m1RNhvbh025854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-27 18:43 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK (given the known bug) Package name: OK Spec file: OK (suggestion, use %{name} in the source of the package) License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum match) Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: failed on libax25-devel build req (but not targeted) Applicable Package Guidelines: - debuginfo package: OK Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272357.m1RNvX2h028560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com 2008-02-27 18:57 EST ------- New stuff (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=473702): http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/pysvn/pysvn.spec http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/pysvn/pysvn-1.5.3-1.f8.src.rpm I'm still going to be working on removing the pycxx strangeness, but since I don't have enough knowledge to do it now, I didn't want to stall this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272356.m1RNuqsd000669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-27 18:56 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK, but warning for using $prog to lock the subsys. I suggest using 'aprsd' instead of '$prog' just like sshd does (for example) Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - debuginfo package: OK (~524K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Feb 27 23:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802272358.m1RNwsxq028797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 00:00:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280000.m1S00kEf001411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: writRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 19:00 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=296143) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296143&action=view) WritRecogn.spec-2.patch Patch to fix rpmlint warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 00:18:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280018.m1S0I4eE004587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: writRecogn -|Review Request: WritRecogn - |A CJK handwriting recognizer|A CJK handwriting recognizer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227081] Review Request: maven-jxr-1.0-2jpp - Maven JXR is a source cross referencing tool. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280102.m1S12tds008863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-jxr-1.0-2jpp - Maven JXR is a source cross referencing tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227081 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227082] Review Request: maven-scm-1.0-0.b3.2jpp - Basic API for lightweight logging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280103.m1S135eA008896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-scm-1.0-0.b3.2jpp - Basic API for lightweight logging https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227082 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227083] Review Request: maven-shared-1.0-4jpp - Maven Shared Components In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280103.m1S13MXW013267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-shared-1.0-4jpp - Maven Shared Components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227083 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:04:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227108] Review Request: plexus-xmlrpc-1.0-0.b4.3jpp - Plexus XML RPC Component In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280104.m1S14She013458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-xmlrpc-1.0-0.b4.3jpp - Plexus XML RPC Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227108 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227095] Review Request: plexus-appserver-1.0-0.a5.3jpp - Plexus Application Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280103.m1S13svn013399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-appserver-1.0-0.a5.3jpp - Plexus Application Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227095 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227084] Review Request: maven-surefire-1.5.3-2jpp - Surefire is a test framework project. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280103.m1S13Wur013298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-surefire-1.5.3-2jpp - Surefire is a test framework project. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227084 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227080] Review Request: maven-doxia-1.0-0.a7.3jpp - Doxia is a content generation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280102.m1S12jqK013189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maven-doxia-1.0-0.a7.3jpp - Doxia is a content generation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227080 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227094] Review Request: plexus-ant-factory-1.0-0.a1.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280103.m1S13jJc013365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-ant-factory-1.0-0.a1.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227094 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227104] Review Request: plexus-maven-plugin-1.2-2jpp - Plexus Maven plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280104.m1S14F9E009179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-maven-plugin-1.2-2jpp - Plexus Maven plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227104 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227105] Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280104.m1S14Mmu009213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-runtime-builder-1.0-0.a9.2jpp - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227105 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 01:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227098] Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280104.m1S145KB009116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: plexus-bsh-factory-1.0-0.a7s.2jpp - Plexus Component Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227098 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280202.m1S22ToB020916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 21:02 EST ------- As for /usr/share/writRecogn/data: Files starting with handwriting are required, others are just examples. Tomoe does not have .desktop, but cellwrite does. :-) Will add the .desktop on 0.2 for main program. WritRecogn-manager, on the other hand, is a command line program, thus the .desktop is not required,. An acknowledge section is appended to AUTHORS. New spec: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/WritRecogn.spec New srpm: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/ WritRecogn-0.1.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280213.m1S2Djpp026860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 21:13 EST ------- Thanks for the update. (In reply to comment #12) > As for /usr/share/writRecogn/data: Files starting with handwriting are > required, others are just examples. Ok, then let's remove the examples from the binary package? > Tomoe does not have .desktop, but cellwrite does. :-) scim-tomoe requires scim and has a menu entry on the SCIM command menu so it is ok. Until WritRecogn is integrated with Input Methods it needs to have a desktop menu. > An acknowledge section is appended to AUTHORS. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] New: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/linpsk.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/linpsk-0.9-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: LinPsk is a program for operating on digital modes running on Linux. LinPsk supports BPSK, QPSK and RTTY at the moment. This srpm mock builds on Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:40:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280240.m1S2eZIv028499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-27 21:40 EST ------- Here is the review: +: ok, -: needs attention MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Better to set BuildRoot to either: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) or %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. They do not match. Please update the upstream source file (or better bump the upstream version). [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [-] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Need to own %{_datadir}/%{name} [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280255.m1S2tqHa003342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-27 21:55 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280257.m1S2vpkZ003729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 Bug 433199 depends on bug 432542, which changed state. Bug 432542 Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432542] Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280257.m1S2vogN003705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: autogen - Automated text file generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-27 21:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > > * autogen-manuals > > - new autogen package should "obsolete" this package. > > Well, I wrote so, however also now autogen can "provide" > autogen-manuals (= %{name}-%{version}). Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 02:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280258.m1S2wI6F032088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 21:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > I prefer to have require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont timidity++ > > explicitly rather than to use virtual provides. > > I assume you mean "I prefer to have timidity++ require > PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont", right? Yes... sorry :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 03:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:02:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435227] New: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xpsk31.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xpsk31-0.7-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: xpsk31 is a GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31, using the same basic signal decoding and encoding engine but controlled by the user via the GUI. In addition it has a FFT-derived "waterfall" display of the incoming signal and a "magniphase" display that shows the magnitude, phase and frequency error of the psk31 signal. This srpm mock builds for Fedora 7, Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 03:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280305.m1S35dKa005913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-27 22:05 EST ------- Once you update your srpm, I will review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 03:46:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435231] New: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xlog.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xlog-1.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: xlog is a logging program for amateur radio operators. The log is stored into a text file. QSO's are presented in a list. Items in the list can be added, deleted or updated. For each contact, dxcc information is displayed and bearings and distance is calculated, both short and long path. xlog supports trlog, adif, cabrillo, edit, twlog and editest files. This srpm mock builds against Fedora 8 and devel. All resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. Fedora 7 is not a target for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 04:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435234] New: Review Request: xdx - DX-cluster tcp/ip client for amateur radio Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435234 Summary: Review Request: xdx - DX-cluster tcp/ip client for amateur radio Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bob at fedoraunity.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xdx.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xdx-2.4-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: xdx is a client to connect to a DX-cluster. Dx messages will be displayed in a list, announcements will go to a text display. This srpm mock builds against Fedora 8 and devel on i386 and x86_64. The resulting rpms are rpmlint clean. Fedora 7 is not a target for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 05:43:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:43:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280543.m1S5hBRD031767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-28 00:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xastir Short Description: Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 05:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280546.m1S5km17032540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 ------- Additional Comments From cooly at gnome.eu.org 2008-02-28 00:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aprsd Short Description: Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 05:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280552.m1S5qjAA001001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-02-28 00:52 EST ------- Hi, Comment #14 addressed. New spec: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/WritRecogn.spec New srpm: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/ WritRecogn-0.1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 06:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280626.m1S6Qsqh012600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 06:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280626.m1S6QflH012539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 cooly at gnome.eu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 07:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280752.m1S7qu0g028064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-28 02:52 EST ------- In future please describe the actual changes in the .spec changelog. I think you need the full path to the icon in the desktop file for it to display. You need to use a tarball from upstream in your package. Otherwise it looks ok to me now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 07:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280754.m1S7srHV023212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-28 02:54 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=296168) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296168&action=view) WritRecogn.spec-3.patch few more suggestions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 08:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280846.m1S8kJ5f000525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-28 03:46 EST ------- Some comments: - When installing icons under %_datadir/icons/hicolor/, icon cache must be updated. Otherwide gnome panel entry won't display the installed icon correctly ("GTK+ icon cache" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ) - build.log shows (for example: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=474798&name=build.log ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ config.status: creating src/utils/Makefile config.status: creating data/Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands + make -j2 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/WritRecogn-0.1.1/missing --run aclocal-1.10 cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/WritRecogn-0.1.1/missing --run autoconf cd . && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/WritRecogn-0.1.1/missing --run automake-1.10 --foreign /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck running CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh /bin/sh ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --disable-static build_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu host_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu target_alias=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic FFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic --no-create --no-recursion --------------------------------------------------------------------- Here autotools are called after configure is finished and then configure is rechecked. This means timestamps of some files must be fixed (i.e. some files need "touch"ing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 09:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280929.m1S9TkSP014833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From rkhadgar at redhat.com 2008-02-28 04:29 EST ------- > You are putting in "librep-common" a lot of byte-compiled .jlc files. > Are you really sure that they are the same for all possible architectures? " As for .jlc's, I've been shipping them in an arch-neutral package in Debian for over a year now, and nothing has broken since, so I guess they are ;) " http://mail.gnome.org/archives/sawfish-list/2008-February/msg00013.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 09:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:53:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431665] Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802280953.m1S9r4ex014270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fox - A C++ library for GUI development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431665 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-02-28 04:53 EST ------- Still waiting for upstream. Going to contact them again sorry about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 11:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218581] Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281143.m1SBh4f5006466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-openid - The OpenID extension for MediaWiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218581 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-02-28 06:43 EST ------- Any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 12:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433642] Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281255.m1SCtXHQ014791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnuradio - Software defined radio framework Alias: gnuradio-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433642 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |EasyFix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281418.m1SEI7ZO030827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From will at netmindz.net 2008-02-28 09:18 EST ------- There is now a new release of app conference -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] New: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,opensource at till.nam e SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/kBuild.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SRPMS/kBuild-0.1.0-0.4.20070627svn.fc8.src.rpm A cross-platform build enviroment. This is used by VirtualBox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281423.m1SENmMD004575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |kBuild-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] New: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsafrane at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/migrationtools/migrationtools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/migrationtools/migrationtools-47-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The MigrationTools are a set of Perl scripts for migrating users, groups, aliases, hosts, netgroups, networks, protocols, RPCs, and services from existing nameservices (flat files, NIS, and NetInfo) to LDAP. The migration tools were packaged as part of openldap-servers rpm. This is not good because: - migrationtools have different upstream than openldap - users may want to have openldap without migrationtools - users do not know where to find migrationtools and they do not know it's part of openldap-servers. - the maintenance of migrationtools can be independent on openldap The migrationtools use slapadd and ldapadd internally, therefore the new package naturally depends on openldap-clients and openldap-servers. I will leave a short README.migration in openldap-servers, so users used to install openldap-servers will know where the migrationtools are. You can find both new openldap and migrationtools packages on http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/migrationtools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:37:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226214] Merge Review: openldap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281437.m1SEbMu7007237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: openldap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226214 ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-28 09:37 EST ------- Jon, I separated migrationtools from openldap package and created new package for it. Could you please do a review of the new package? It's quite simple and you already know openldap internals, so it should not be anything complicated. You can find the review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:57:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435287] New: Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435287 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-static.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-static-0.9.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension)here> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281457.m1SEvx7r011903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |435287 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435287] Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281457.m1SEvw94011882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435287 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |435286 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435286] New: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-wheel.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-json-wheel-1.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for parsing JSON -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 14:59:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281459.m1SExHbK006780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 09:59 EST ------- This package is completely rpmlint clean (w00t!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:00:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435287] Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281500.m1SF0RN2007380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-static - OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435287 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 10:00 EST ------- This package is rpmlint-clean except for: ocaml-json-static.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-json-static.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are not bugs in the package. See bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435286] Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281501.m1SF1AFb012900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-json-wheel - OCaml library for parsing JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435286 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |241472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241472] Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281501.m1SF1CrI012921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ocamlnet - Network protocols for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241472 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |435286 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:05:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281505.m1SF5xH6014161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-28 10:05 EST ------- rpmlint is clean. MUSTFIX: URL tag should be http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html, move current value of URL tag to Source0 tag. Otherwise, on full review, it looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:14:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:14:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281514.m1SFESgD015678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-02-28 10:14 EST ------- Oops seems I dropped this. Sure no problem, update and commit please, Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281518.m1SFIiut011014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-28 10:18 EST ------- second attempt, with fixed url: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/migrationtools2/migrationtools.spec http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/migrationtools2/migrationtools-47-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435293] New: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435293 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-openin - OCaml syntax to locally open modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-openin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-openin-20070524-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml syntax to locally open modules The package is rpmlint-clean except for: ocaml-openin.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-openin.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib which are not bugs, see bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:31:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281531.m1SFVB5F013945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-28 10:31 EST ------- Excellent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281534.m1SFYbiX020175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-28 10:34 EST ------- Thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435299] New: Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435299 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-monad.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-pa-monad-1.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml syntax extension for monads This one is not particularly rpmlint clean, but all the errors and warnings are not bugs in the package itself: $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ocaml-pa-monad-1.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm ocaml-pa-monad.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions $ rpmlint /home/rjones/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/ocaml-pa-monad-1.2.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm ocaml-pa-monad.i386: W: invalid-license LGPLv2+ with exceptions See bug 434690. ocaml-pa-monad.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-pa-monad.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib See bug 433783. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281536.m1SFaKoC020863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-28 10:36 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: migrationtools Short Description: Migration scripts for LDAP Owners: jsafrane Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 15:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281542.m1SFgTcF016247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-02-28 10:42 EST ------- Will Asterisk is now in Fedora please file a bug against asterisk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 16:10:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225984] Merge Review: lftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281610.m1SGAOGA027730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: lftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225984 ------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com 2008-02-28 11:10 EST ------- Will do, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 16:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435064] Review Request: midisport-firmware - firmware files for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281616.m1SGGs4m023422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: midisport-firmware - firmware files for M-Audio/Midiman USB MIDI and Audio devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435064 ------- Additional Comments From davej at redhat.com 2008-02-28 11:16 EST ------- Updated to add udev rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 16:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281617.m1SGHf5D028858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-28 11:17 EST ------- > "... and nothing has broken since ..." That is a good hint but a pretty weak argument, appearences to the contrary. If those files were used mostly for i386 and x86_64 then there are many similarities here, including endianess. Checking in sources that a byte compiler is indeed arch-independent would be a different matter. I looked through installed "noarch" packages on one system and peeked at such few which could be a subpackage; like 'gimp-help', for example. They all appear to build separately; so this seems to support what I said in comment #7. OTOH is there really any good reason for somebody to try to install sawfish.i386 and sawfish.x86_64 at the same time which would require two variants of librep and would cause conflicts on files from "common"? I do not see any but possibly I miss something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 16:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] New: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com,rob.myers at gtri.gate ch.edu Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-1.el5.src.rpm Description: The File::LibMagic is a simple perl interface to libmagic from the file-4.x package from Christos Zoulas (ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/file/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 16:20:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:20:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 430417] Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281620.m1SGK68R024142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-28 11:20 EST ------- New version: * Thu Feb 28 2008 Hans de Goede 4.1-2 - Stop providing timidity++-soundfont and /etc/timidity++.cfg, instead timidity++ itself will come with an /etc/timidity++.cfg and Require its default soundfont (bz 430417) Go grab it here: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont-4.1-2.fc9.src.rpm I've also prepared a matching timidity++ release: * Thu Feb 28 2008 Hans de Goede 2.13.2-12 - Stop shipping a timidity++-patches package, investigation into the license of the included patches has turned up doubts about the rights of the author of the midas SGI midi player to release these into the Public Domain - Instead require PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont, and point to PCLite.sf2 in timidity++.cfg - Note PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont also has a PersonalCopy-Lite-patches sub-package with the .sf2 file converted to GUS patch format for other applications who require timidity++-patches to get GUS format patches, this package contains an /etc/timidity.cfg file pointing to the gus patches, therefor the timidity++ package now ships a timidty++.cfg instead of a timidity.cfg - Check for /etc/timidity++.cfg before trying /etc/timidity.cfg, see above for rationale Grab it here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/timidity++.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/timidity++-2.13.2-13.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 17:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281704.m1SH46bU004464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From will at netmindz.net 2008-02-28 12:04 EST ------- The app_conference is not from asterisk.org it's a 3rd part app from http://sourceforge.net/projects/appconference/ Asterisk ships with app_meetme which requires zaptel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 17:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281708.m1SH8vdP000995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ocjtech.us 2008-02-28 12:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #159) > The app_conference is not from asterisk.org it's a 3rd part app from > http://sourceforge.net/projects/appconference/ > Asterisk ships with app_meetme which requires zaptel Yes, I'm aware of where app_conference came from. What Dennis meant was to file a NEW bug against the Fedora Asterisk package. Please don't add a new request like this to a bug that has been closed for several months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 17:38:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:38:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281738.m1SHcQP9006556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-28 12:38 EST ------- Bruno Haible the author of ffcall, prefers it not to be compiled shared. His arguments are: 1) It is overkill: libavcall, libvacall, libcallback have less than 1 KB of executable code (most of the real code is in the header files): 2) The main function here is compiled from non-PIC assembly language. I.e. relocations would remain. The GNU linker supports shared libraries with relocations on x86 systems. But only on x86! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 17:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:42:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281742.m1SHgWur007384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-02-28 12:42 EST ------- Hi Wart, Here are my preliminary comments on your package : Summary is not capitalized. I like nsca-client much better than what I used. Is it really useful to suffix the packages with nagios- though ? This would clear rpmlint output from nagios-nsca.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nsca $prog nagios-nsca.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name nsca nagios, nrpe and all are in the group Applications/System. You probably want to use the same. I don't have the BR: on libmcrypt-devel and my package build fine. Is it necessary to keep it ? I have some requires on /sbin/service and /sbin/chkconfig, taken from nrpe packages, not sure this is needed, can't find anything in the packaging guidelines. Requires(preun): /sbin/service, /sbin/chkconfig Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service Requires(postun): /sbin/service NetSaint can probably be stripped out of the description. Upstream ships an initscript (generated at build time actually) that only lacks reload, it might not worth to replace it completely. 0600 on the conf files is good. No doc in nsca-client, add %doc Changelog LEGAL README SECURITY Nothing more for today, let me know what you think. Regards, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 17:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435299] Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281757.m1SHvODx010110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435299 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-28 12:57 EST ------- I'm going to try and work through these ocaml reviews since they seem mostly clean, but I noticed that while you have submitted a whole pile of packages for review I don't seem to be able to find any packages which you have reviewed. At least, a search for all tickets assigned to you with "review request" in the summary didn't turn anything up. The queue of review requests is growing quickly and these recent ocaml packages are a large portion of that growth. Could you help us out by reviewing a few other packages? We're not asking for one review per submitted package (although that would certainly solve our problems with the review queue size) but anything you can do to help would be greatly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281808.m1SI8JMU012427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-28 13:08 EST ------- Alright, in this case, go back to static, drop the shared, and we'll call it good. Will this build on ppc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:14:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433161] Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281814.m1SIE0CJ016934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cwdaemon - Morse daemon for the parallel or serial port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433161 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 13:13 EST ------- Todd, Thank you for reviewing this package for me. I am going to close this review for now, I just do not have the resources/skills/information needed at this time to take this package on. I will keep the spec and srpms hosted if some other party would like to look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281816.m1SIGbLv014498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281859.m1SIxqXx022880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281859.m1SIxWE8022841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |429535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 18:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281859.m1SIxVrX022820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |242651 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:00:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281900.m1SJ09xd026680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281907.m1SJ7JNR024893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-28 14:07 EST ------- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/anjuta-2.2.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281912.m1SJCs8R029154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-02-28 14:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > - Please try to remove chrpath use Fixed. > ! Note > You don't have to write || : multiple times on scriptlets. I do that because Hans had once asked me to do so: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247417#c19 Is this a problem? If it is, then I will have to fix a number of my existing packages. > - About this scriptlet: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > %post doc > scrollkeeper-update -q -o %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} || : > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > File entry of -doc subpackage reads: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > %dir %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}-manual > %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}-manual/%{name}-manual-C.omf > ------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:27:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281927.m1SJRKxf028554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:27 EST ------- + rpmlint is clean on all packages + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name - package doesn't satisfy packaging guidelines Needs to filter requires and provides, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license no separate license file so N/A + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm md5sum is 51f609343908803bbc78774ceb81c431 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 + ExcludeArch bugs filed no ExcludeArch so N/A + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* N/A + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N/A + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates my reading of directory ownership for Perl indicates that the package is doing the right thing + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage documentation isn't large + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel N/A + static libraries should be in -static N/A + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' N/A + libfoo.so must go in -devel N/A + -devel must require the fully versioned base N/A + packages should not contain libtool .la files N/A + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file N/A + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages (see above) + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream ==> packager needs to talk to upstream + translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures ? review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ---------- Please look at the Perl packaging guidelines to see if the above problem needs to be corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281930.m1SJUwbr029352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:34:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281934.m1SJYDh2000907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:33:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242651] Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281933.m1SJXxiO000859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-Audit - something flexible to filter mail using Perl tests. Alias: perl-Mail-Audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242651 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:33 EST ------- This package needs more BuildRequires. During rpmbuild I get the error below and all the tests fail. Warning: prerequisite File::HomeDir 0.61 not found. Warning: prerequisite File::Tempdir 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite MIME::Entity 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite Mail::Internet 0 not found. Warning: prerequisite Mail::Mailer 0 not found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281939.m1SJdS07030601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-02-28 14:39 EST ------- This is my first package so I am seeking a sponsor. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281938.m1SJcigM030514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:38 EST ------- BTW, just a note to say that I am upstream maintainer for this package. The tests aim to test all possible functionality of the package, so I'd suggest that you either add the necessary BuildRequires for them to run, or else patch out the tests which you don't want to run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281940.m1SJeBmb031002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:40 EST ------- Starting review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281942.m1SJgBY2003124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-28 14:42 EST ------- This looks good to me. Again they're not too clear about the LGPL version in use, but there is some statement about the version in use at the top of the LICENSE file, which seems good enough to me. * source files match upstream: d45af5deee6126137eb1bd896373ceeabacb916e30b977122de2eb3134336f08 camlzip-1.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * package follows ocaml guidelines * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-zip-1.03-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm dllcamlzip.so()(64bit) ocaml(Gzip) = 6258f07d6e9179c9ee17180766a0978e ocaml(Zip) = 48478f1ccd637a3af5ebf6d8031b475a ocaml(Zlib) = f525a2d075f92332c0da098f58f3b6fb ocaml-zip = 1.03-1.fc9 = libz.so.1()(64bit) ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Hashtbl) = 083f2c94b44ff4e0b3220aaea6a783b4 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(Sys) = 0da495f5a80f31899139359805318f28 ocaml(Unix) = 9a46a8db115947409e54686ada118599 ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 ocaml-zip-devel-1.03-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm ocaml-zip-devel = 1.03-1.fc9 = ocaml-zip = 1.03-1.fc9 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files (except allowed license file) * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250634] Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281943.m1SJhRxx031529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Mail-DKIM - Perl module for DKIM support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250634 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(lmb at biosci.ki.se) ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:43 EST ------- Looks like the upstream package URI has changed and a new version has been released (1.0.1). Can you upgrade and build a new specfile+SRPM and I'll do a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399951] Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281946.m1SJkeIV004061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399951 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:46 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. This one fell off my radar for a bit, due to the fact that we discovered that FretsOnFire was no-go for Fedora. All issues mentioned above are resolved in -2. New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/PyAmanith-0.3.35-2.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/PyAmanith.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 376531] perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281949.m1SJnhVQ032568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376531 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 14:49 EST ------- Starting review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 381241] Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281951.m1SJput5005298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ncl - NCAR Command Language and NCAR Graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=381241 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 14:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434642] Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281956.m1SJug39001684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xastir - Amateur Station Tracking and Reporting system for amateur radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434642 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 14:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:55:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434547] Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802281955.m1SJt6XT006252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aprsd - Internet gateway and client access to amateur radio APRS packet data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434547 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 14:55 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 19:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435347] New: Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435347 Summary: Review Request: egd - Entropy Gathering Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/egd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/egd-0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: EGD is an Entropy Gathering Daemon meant to be used on systems that can run GPG but which don't have a convenient (or reliable) source of random bits. It is a regular user-space program that sits around, running programs like 'w' and 'last' and 'vmstat', collecting the randomness (or at least the unpredictability) inherent in the output of these system statistics programs when used on a reasonably busy system. It slowly stirs the output of these gathering programs into a pool of entropy, much like the linux kernel device, and allows other programs to read out random bits from this pool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 376531] perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282007.m1SK7aY6008992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376531 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 15:07 EST ------- + rpmlint output rpmlint is clean + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name - package should satisfy packaging guidelines should filter provides/requires (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl) + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm md5 a5af1ec69180f9b54e9b07cf4cb8bada + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 + ExcludeArch bugs filed N/A + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* N/A + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N/A + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage N/A docs are small + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel N/A + static libraries should be in -static N/A + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' N/A + libfoo.so must go in -devel N/A + -devel must require the fully versioned base N/A + packages should not contain libtool .la files N/A + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file N/A + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages N/A + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: + if there is no license file, packager should query upstream + translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock ? the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -------- Please take a look at the Perl packaging guidelines. I'm not sure about this requirement for filtering provides & requires and as such I've just raised a question on fedora-packaging: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-February/msg00111.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282011.m1SKBTFK010007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 15:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:15:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282015.m1SKFrFe005324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 15:15 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-zip Short Description: OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 376531] perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282041.m1SKfUhC010040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: perl-Dir-Which - Search for directory entries in a list of directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=376531 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 15:41 EST ------- OK, turns out that the provides and requires are fine for this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429535] Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282042.m1SKg3aY015970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Tempdir - This module provide an object interface to tempdir() from File::Temp. Alias: perl-File-Tempdir https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429535 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jorge at konnekt.org)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-28 15:42 EST ------- OK, turns out that the provides and requires are fine for this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 20:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282052.m1SKqrQH012297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-28 15:52 EST ------- I guess I didn't comminucate my point well enough. I was just saying that this package should have a release of "1.20080221git5db7920" instead of "0.20080221git5db7920". This package comes from a snapshot made after the software started calling itself "0.0.10", so it's a post-release snapshot, and so gets named "X.YYYMMDDwhatever" where X is an integer one or greater (and you have '0' there). But really, it's minor. I'm still seeing the version-release string in the changelog entry not matching the actual version-release of the package. But again, that's minor. I'll approve this because it's pointless to go back and forth over two trivial one-liners that don't affect the functionality, but please fix up both of them when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435370] New: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/bsd/cpdup.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/for_review/bsd/cpdup-1.07-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The cpdup utility makes an exact mirror copy of the source in the destination, creating and deleting files and directories as necessary. UTimes, hardlinks, softlinks, devices, permissions, and flags are mirrored. By default, cpdup asks for confirmation if any file or directory needs to be removed from the destination and does not copy files which it believes to have already been synchronized (by observing that the source and destination file?s size and mtimes match). cpdup does not cross mount points in either the source or the destination. As a safety measure, cpdup refuses to replace a destination directory with a file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:12:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282112.m1SLC7U2016464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-28 16:12 EST ------- I'm ready to commit, but unfortunately there's an ACL on the package that prevents me from doing that: **** Access denied: scop is not in ACL for rpms/xhtml1-dtds/devel I've just applied for co-maintainership in devel; if you could approve the requests in pkgdb (and/or check the "group members can commit" for cvsextras if you're fine with it), that should grant me the needed permissions: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/xhtml1-dtds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282118.m1SLI8Ct023786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-28 16:18 EST ------- Builds on i386 and x86_64; rpmlint output is clean, apart from the *.ml and cilly.byte.exe file that's been discussed. Looks good -- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282119.m1SLJtZS018498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-28 16:19 EST ------- New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2-2.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/gambas2.spec The scratch build is running now, if it succeeds, I will post the result, if it fails, I'll fix up the SRPM so that it works and post the resulting success. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227048] Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282125.m1SLPfrq020091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dom2-core-tests-0.0.1-0.20040405.1jpp - DOM Conformance Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide dbhole at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED ------- Additional Comments From dbhole at redhat.com 2008-02-28 16:25 EST ------- This package is not required at this time. I see no reason to pull it in and increase maintenance burden. Therefore I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:36:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282136.m1SLaRSn022248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-28 16:36 EST ------- halevt-0.0.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282138.m1SLcTJ2028293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 16:38 EST ------- Ping, pending a CVS request Bob... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282136.m1SLaTSc027475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version| |0.0.7-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433082] Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282137.m1SLbToE027896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libax24 - AX.25 library for hamradio applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433082 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 16:37 EST ------- Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282138.m1SLcBKr028170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-28 16:38 EST ------- The changelog in the .spec file is for changes to the spec file itself, not for copying the packaged source "ChangeLog". :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282139.m1SLdJuZ023261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 16:39 EST ------- Ping Bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435042] Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282146.m1SLkUYG000341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435042 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 21:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435042] Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282153.m1SLrxjN027442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435042 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 16:53 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK (suggest you make use of %{name} and %{version} in the Source0 URL) License: OK Actual License: OK (GPLv2+) %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: OK Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK (suggest use %{name} and %{version} in Source0) Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Pretty straightforward, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 22:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435058] Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282216.m1SMGM7i006211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435058 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sconklin at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 17:16 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -utils subpackage requires base package: OK - no duplicate ownership of files and directories between the split packages: OK - debuginfo package: small but OK (~12K for a small binary) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: N/A Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: OK Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Suggestion: move the .desktop and icon file from the -utils subpackage to the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:23:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282323.m1SNNjda019175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 18:23 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK (GPLv2 or later) Actual License: OK (GPLv2 in COPYING, GPLv2+ in source) %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~2.5M) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK A small suggestion for the %files section; you might want to use more wildcards (*) instead of %{name}, but it's really up to you as a maintainer. Otherwise, once more, your packages are a breeze to review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282329.m1SNTFvC013014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 18:29 EST ------- Source0 is a 404: http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/psk31/xpsk31/xpsk31-0.7.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282334.m1SNYVQs013938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or| |g) | ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 18:34 EST ------- Upstream apparently deletes old source, the new source will require a version bump http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/psk31/xpsk31/xpsk31-0.8.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227122] Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282338.m1SNcWIw014693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlbeans-2.1.0-3jpp - XML-Java binding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227122 ------- Additional Comments From dwalluck at redhat.com 2008-02-28 18:38 EST ------- XMLBeans still remains an optional dependency of rhino as of rhino version 1_7R1-RC1. The E4X support in rhino is only enabled if xmlbeans/xbean.jar is present during the build. One issue is that apparently xmlbeans support would be enabled in the JPackage version of rhino since JPackage ships xmlbeans, but not in the Fedora-based version. Last I looked, xmlbeans had some circular dependency or other preventing it from being built easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:52:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435231] Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282352.m1SNqjqs016985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xlog - Logging program for Ham Radio Operators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435231 kanarip at kanarip.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or | |g) ------- Additional Comments From kanarip at kanarip.com 2008-02-28 18:52 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: OK (md5sum) Compile and Build: - F-7: FAILED (but not a target) - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: FAILED (but not a target) Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~444k) Locales: OK Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: See suggestions File Permissions: OK Macro usage: See suggestions Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: OK Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK in %prep, invoke sed using the %{_sed} macro. Consider using '-i -e' for inline regexp replacement (instead of moving the file around). Better yet, create and apply a patch here. AUTHORS file is in both %doc and %{_datadir}/xlog/, same goes for BUGS and ChangeLog. I guess the files in %{_datadir}/xlog should go into %docs as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Feb 28 23:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:58:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802282358.m1SNwvr4025553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 airlied at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From airlied at redhat.com 2008-02-28 18:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau Short Description: Xorg X11 nouveau driver for nvidia hardware Owners: airlied Branches: InitialCC: ajax Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 00:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290037.m1T0bOKN025021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-02-28 19:37 EST ------- As shown in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 The short form is prefered. The icon cache issue has been dealt with in 0.1.1-4 New spec:http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/WritRecogn.spec New srpm: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/WritRecogn-0.1.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 00:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434911] Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290046.m1T0kWpi001737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gmfsk - A Gnome Multimode HF Terminal for Ham Radio https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434911 ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-28 19:46 EST ------- New srpm: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/gmfsk-0.7-0.pre1.4.fc9.src.rpm New spec: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/gmfsk.spec This fixes the build problem, and some errors during desktop file install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 01:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399951] Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290114.m1T1EjIg031213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyAmanith - Python bindings for Amanith https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399951 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-28 20:14 EST ------- OK; builds fine now, rpmlint is silent andthe COPYING file is included. Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 01:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290129.m1T1T7d2008666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or|fedora-cvs? |g) | ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 20:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linpsk Short Description: Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 01:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435058] Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290128.m1T1SHHv008570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: splat - Analyze point-to-point terrestrial RF communication links https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435058 sconklin at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(sconklin at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-28 20:28 EST ------- Actually, splat has no gui, and needs to be run from the command line. I removed the desktop file and icon. New srpm: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/splat-1.2.1-6.fc9.src.rpm New spec: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/splat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 03:12:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290312.m1T3CfRE018022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 22:12 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 03:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:14:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290314.m1T3Efcu025438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 22:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 03:17:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290317.m1T3HYfw018989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-28 22:17 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 03:43:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290343.m1T3hRvS030861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-28 22:43 EST ------- why this package have ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 03:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290345.m1T3jGXU024530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-28 22:45 EST ------- why this package have ExcludeArch: x86_64 ExcludeArch: ppc64 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:30:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290430.m1T4UuYr032641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-28 23:30 EST ------- linpsk-0.9-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290434.m1T4Yq6J007187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 23:34 EST ------- Thank you kanarip for yet another review. Thank you nirik for cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435220] Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290441.m1T4fHpI008406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linpsk - Psk31 and RTTY program for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435220 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-28 23:41 EST ------- linpsk-0.9-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290446.m1T4ko5W009179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 23:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: LinLog Short Description: A ham radio logbook for Linux Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290448.m1T4mSpo002476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bob at fedoraunity.or|fedora-cvs? |g) | ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-28 23:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dxcc Short Description: Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign Owners: bjensen,sconklin Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: sindrepb Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 04:56:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290456.m1T4u6hK010562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-28 23:56 EST ------- Thanks, I think the package now satisfies all the Packaging Requirements. (As Tasaka commented it would be better to fix the build configure issue.) Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 05:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290525.m1T5PVqg015268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-02-29 00:25 EST ------- Parag: see where do we set BUILD_TARGET_ARCH. kBuild uses architecture name as part of file names and it seems to be only aware of "x86" and "amd64". That makes perfect sense -- it is only used to build VirtualBox and VirtualBox runs nowhere else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 05:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434633] Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290532.m1T5WIa4009391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434633 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 00:32 EST ------- SRPM not working -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 05:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290554.m1T5skAJ019367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-02-29 00:54 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: WritRecogn Short Description: A CJK handwriting recognizer Owners: dchen Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: dchen Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 06:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290628.m1T6SNcR025406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment Alias: kBuild-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 01:28 EST ------- Thanks for reply. Reason to ask this is that I see some reviewers asking same thing as review should make sure new package builds on all archs. But if its not doing that then better to know reason and add that in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 06:33:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:33:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434954] Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290633.m1T6XfMk019566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: WritRecogn - A CJK handwriting recognizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434954 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-02-29 01:33 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 06:45:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 01:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290645.m1T6jvYP028135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-29 01:45 EST ------- Some pre-review pointers:- - Use of make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" is recommended as it keeps the timestamps on installed files. This is useful for recent autotools based make file. - INSTALL file is not required in %doc section as it is used to install from the source. RPM installation does not require INSTALL file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 07:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290726.m1T7QdP2027855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From rayvd at bludgeon.org 2008-02-29 02:26 EST ------- Just a note here as I am using Axel's 2.0.4-5 SRPM on my EL5 system. I wanted to use maildrop with virtual users which you can either hand-code logic for in your maildroprc file or make use of courier-authlib. I wanted to use courier-authlib. Issues I ran in to: * courier-authlib isn't yet packaged for Fedora/EL (easy enough to fix this) * maildrop appears to only build in support for courier-authlib if courier-authlib is already on the system. I built the courier-authlib RPM from the included .spec file and installed the courier-authlib-devel package and _then_ built Axel's maildrop RPM and was able to end up with a maildrop that supports courier-authlib. Anyways, just something to keep in mind -- especially for a future packager of courier-authlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 07:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290733.m1T7XZFi002991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-29 02:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:44:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:44:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434169] Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290944.m1T9iwLB014013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-zip - OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434169 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:48:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435427] New: rpm ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.ppc is empty Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435427 Summary: rpm ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.ppc is empty Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: ppc64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugproxy at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com =Comment: #0================================================= Mohammed Omar - 2008-02-28 04:24 EDT ----Problem description:---- ppc64-utils rpm is empty.Actually I was searching for mkzimage, which is part of ppc64-utils package. rpm: ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.ppc version: 0.14-1.fc9.ppc Distro: Fedora 9 Alpha ---additional info--- I cheked with rawhide rpm (ppc64-utils-0.14-2.fc9.ppc) .Which is also null. --Regards Omar M =Comment: #1================================================= Suzuki Kp - 2008-02-28 10:50 EDT Please provide additional informations, like : 1) Where did you download the ppc64-utils rpm ? 2) How did you confirm the rpm is empty ? Thanks Suzuki =Comment: #2================================================= Mohammed Omar - 2008-02-28 23:34 EDT ppc64-utils rpm shipped with DVD iso. Downloaded from http://software.linux.ibm.com/pub/fedora/releases/test/9-Alpha/Fedora/ppc/iso ---rpm -qa | grep ppc64-util---- ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9 ---rpm -ql ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9--- (contains no files) Even if you open this rpm with archive manager, you can confirm. --Regards Omar M =Comment: #3================================================= Suzuki Kp - 2008-02-29 00:35 EDT I verified the rpm downloaded from http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/9-Alpha/Fedora/ppc/os/Packages/ It also shows the same message. Looks to be a packaging issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:38:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:38:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290938.m1T9cPrY020393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 04:38 EST ------- Starting review on this in an hour or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290926.m1T9QghM018891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 04:26 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-cil Short Description: CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation Owners: rjones Branches: F-8 InitialCC: rjones Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434633] Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290919.m1T9JmaD010719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-xmlrpc-light - OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434633 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 04:19 EST ------- Ooops, URLs were missing an extra component. Try: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlrpc-light.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-xmlrpc-light-0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: OCaml library for writing XML-RPC clients and servers The RPMs are rpmlint-clean except for these errors from the main subpackage: ocaml-xmlrpc-light.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-xmlrpc-light.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These can both be ignored (bug 433783). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 09:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290952.m1T9qJ3U022465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 04:52 EST ------- build.log showed sh: camlp4o: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 08:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802290821.m1T8L4Ye010811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia at gmail.com 2008-02-29 03:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > For 1.0.13-4: > > * Source tarball > - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what > is written as %Source: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 197993 2006-01-27 23:03 dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 200442 2008-02-23 12:58 > dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz > ---------------------------------------------------------- I manually changed the encoding of AUTHORS and doc/dotconf-features.txt. This was causing teh problem. I have requested to dotconf developer to make in correct in there source file. I have also changed the encoding using iconv. > * rpmlint > Please check your rpms by rpmlint again? > ---------------------------------------------------------- > dotconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf > dotconf.src: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file > parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. > dotconf.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dotconf-1.0.13/AUTHORS > dotconf.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf > dotconf.i386: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file > parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. > dotconf.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0,13.4 1.0.13-4.fc9 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Summary: > - Summary must begin with capital letter. > Also, please change the Summary "dot.conf". This Summary description > is not useful. > > - description-line-too-long: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long > description-line-too-long : > Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding > this number, cut it to fit in two lines. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > - AUTHORS file is not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the > encoding to UTF-8. > > - The EVR (epoch-version-release) in %changelog is not right. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia 1.0.13-4 > - Applied patch macro > > * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia 1.0.13-3 > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Also please insert one line between each %changelog entry. > This is useful for Fedora's CVS system. > > Then, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: Done All. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. > > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other > submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. > For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) > are required to "show that you have an understanding > of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described > on : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request > (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do > a formal review) Pre-reviewed bug number 435227. I will review more bugs shortly. > Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to > review can be checked on: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone This url is not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 10:21:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:21:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435431] New: Review Request: ocaml-deriving - Extension to OCaml for deriving functions from types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435431 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-deriving - Extension to OCaml for deriving functions from types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-deriving.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-deriving-0.1.1a-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Extension to OCaml for deriving functions from types Output of rpmlint: ocaml-deriving.i386: E: no-binary ocaml-deriving.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib (Can be ignored - see bug 433783). List of files in the main package: /usr/bin/deriving /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/META /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/bounded.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/deriving.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dump.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dynmap.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/enum.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/eq.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/functor.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/interned.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/monad.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/pickle.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/show.cmi /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/typeable.cmi /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-0.1.1a /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-0.1.1a/COPYING List of files in -devel subpackage: /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/bounded.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/bounded.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/deriving.a /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/deriving.cmxa /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dump.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dump.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dynmap.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/dynmap.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/enum.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/enum.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/eq.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/eq.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/functor.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/functor.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/interned.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/interned.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/monad.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/monad.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/pickle.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/pickle.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/show.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/show.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/typeable.cmx /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/typeable.mli /usr/lib/ocaml/deriving/util.mli /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-devel-0.1.1a /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-devel-0.1.1a/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-devel-0.1.1a/COPYING /usr/share/doc/ocaml-deriving-devel-0.1.1a/README Requires for main package: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 /usr/bin/ocamlrun ocaml(Array) = aa8e3cd5824f9bb40b93fcd38d0c95b5 ocaml(Big_int) = 992d682669507b99e689b5a2188c0b9a ocaml(Buffer) = f6cef633ea14963b84b79c4095c63dc3 ocaml(CamlinternalMod) = dc6994f75cfd14f73e718f81aa215803 ocaml(Char) = e98bc9c9e918a84b3c1a5a122d42fac1 ocaml(Format) = 35fe566f7a37d8991a5c822bd1463949 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(Int64) = f8f7e2e4c0667ead94596040b12e732d ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Map) = dedde7683d54ae7db1eb97cc868dd047 ocaml(Marshal) = b7e47558bc02738dea90d6bd22a06c7b ocaml(Nat) = 0ea20dd1cc4533fd519b5542a89feb87 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Num) = cfa2705c9c6d6f5a56b83f91fc630d2a ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(Printf) = 5dbbf45a03b54e6dbfcf39178d0d6341 ocaml(Ratio) = 7067125cce206dd2bbe93918ba7bdfe9 ocaml(Set) = 7da14e671a035f12386ace3890018ef3 ocaml(Stream) = 21a833e12efd34ea0c87d8d9da959809 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 Provides for main package: ocaml(Bounded) = 2d00c01a31a0f1d6c7fe150ee578a21e ocaml(Dump) = 56f763a983d53210785cde82bc8a6a90 ocaml(Dynmap) = 63cadc12a144b0aaad8e4fd3c4bbc828 ocaml(Enum) = b0841de5b5173f6c681b0f60a44acd1f ocaml(Eq) = 4a7db7be84324b4842d475f90cc5d19b ocaml(Functor) = b3e3dc0544daee821a5adf29f9a4d127 ocaml(Interned) = 25b1ef1de9e5ff2114bb86c919832f33 ocaml(Monad) = 8abdc2a3027781506c2614dad9cfa0fa ocaml(Pickle) = 124c2989bfeb792a94dbc96910467982 ocaml(Show) = 0f99373d708ef67254201e1442de451e ocaml(Typeable) = dc099a13123a6e8423582f0128ca528f ocaml-deriving = 0.1.1a-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 10:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226312] Merge Review: ppc64-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291034.m1TAYdaX021525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ppc64-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226312 ------- Additional Comments From bugproxy at us.ibm.com 2008-02-29 05:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I found ppc64-utils-0.14-1.fc9.ppc.rpm empty. It doesn't provides any binaries. > > --Regards > Omar M Bug #435427 is opened for addressing this issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435427) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 10:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435433] New: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tsmetana at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ocrad/ocrad.spec SRPM URL: http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ocrad/ocrad-0.17-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNU Ocrad is an OCR (Optical Character Recognition) program based on a feature extraction method. It reads images in pbm (bitmap), pgm (greyscale) or ppm (color) formats and produces text in byte (8-bit) or UTF-8 formats. Also includes a layout analyser able to separate the columns or blocks of text normally found on printed pages. Ocrad can be used as a stand-alone console application, or as a backend to other programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 10:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291058.m1TAw2fZ000305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 05:58 EST ------- Starting review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 10:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291055.m1TAtnLh032517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 05:55 EST ------- + rpmlint output no output from rpmlint + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora BSD + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file there is no license file included + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm md5: 4f9d132f5a81d3f38b53267ae7af24a8 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture i386 ? ExcludeArch bugs filed Please file ExcludeArch bugs if necessary, and post the bug numbers here. + BuildRequires list all build dependencies + %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content + large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage N/A + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel + static libraries should be in -static + packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: ? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream + translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available ? reviewer should build the package in mock - the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures ? review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane + pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -------- Please file those ExcludeArch bugs if necessary and put the bug numbers here, and then I can approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291100.m1TB0nut026064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 06:00 EST ------- missing BR: automake gtk2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:02:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291102.m1TB2OVU026361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 06:02 EST ------- OK there are a few basic problems you need to fix. Add BuildRequires: file-devel The tests fail in a very strange way for me: t/1....................ok t/2-easy...............ok 1/6 unexpectedly succeeded t/3-complete-errors....ok 1/8 unexpectedly succeeded t/3-complete...........ok t/4-all................ok t/6-oo.................ok 1/20 # Failed test 'MIME t/samples/foo.c' # in t/6-oo.t at line 27. # got: 'text/x-c charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/x-c; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 2 # Failed test 'MIME data t/samples/foo.c' # in t/6-oo.t at line 36. # got: 'text/x-c charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/x-c; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 4 # Failed test 'MIME t/samples/foo.foo' # in t/6-oo.t at line 27. # got: 'text/plain charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/plain; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 6 # Failed test 'MIME data t/samples/foo.foo' # in t/6-oo.t at line 36. # got: 'text/plain charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/plain; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 8 # Failed test 'MIME t/samples/foo.c' # in t/6-oo.t at line 48. # got: 'text/x-c charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/x-c; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 11 # Failed test 'MIME data t/samples/foo.c' # in t/6-oo.t at line 57. # got: 'text/x-c charset=us-ascii' # expected: 'text/x-c; charset=us-ascii' t/6-oo.................NOK 13# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 20. t/6-oo.................dubious Test returned status 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600) DIED. FAILED tests 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13 Failed 6/20 tests, 70.00% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/6-oo.t 6 1536 20 6 30.00% 2 4 6 8 11 13 (2 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED). Please try building under Fedora Rawhide and fix the above errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291102.m1TB2q2C001414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(josh.kayse at gtri.ga | |tech.edu) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435433] Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291112.m1TBCY7m028157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 06:12 EST ------- 1)make command should be using parallel make make %{?_smp_mflags} 2)your build section should be %configure make CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} 3) make install should be called as make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 4) %files section should look like %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README TODO %{_bindir}/ocrad %{_mandir}/man1/* %{_infodir}/ocrad.info.gz 5) missing requires Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434713] Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291111.m1TBB9A5003000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cairo - OCaml library for accessing cairo graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434713 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 06:11 EST ------- Thanks, missing BRs added: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080224-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435433] Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291117.m1TBHKCY028918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-02-29 06:17 EST ------- also, build is failing with error common.cc: In member function 'bool Charset::enable(const char*)': common.cc:84: error: 'strcmp' is not a member of 'std' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291132.m1TBWX7D031222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 ------- Additional Comments From alex at tvtransilvania.ro 2008-02-29 06:32 EST ------- Spec URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1.spec SRPM URL: http://tvtransilvania.ro/ics/Fedora/devel/liblqr-1-0.1.0-5.fc9.src.rpm I have a clean rpmlint report now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:32:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:32:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435279] Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291132.m1TBWUXZ005917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: migrationtools - Migration scripts for LDAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435279 jsafrane at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane at redhat.com 2008-02-29 06:32 EST ------- migrationtools package has been built and should appear together with fixed openldap in tomorrow's rawhide and in Fedora9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 11:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291135.m1TBZo7A031922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-02-29 06:35 EST ------- There is no progress on this package. Please, would someone else like to take over this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:07:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291207.m1TC7SMh012132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-02-29 07:07 EST ------- In my view, the two potential maintainers (Richard and Peter) need to co-ordinate their work to be co-maintainer of the package. (either in livna or Fedora). @Richard As your are the ocaml maintainer in Fedora, your interest in mldonkey is valuable. And as such, the ocaml-find-requires.sh requirement is an important improvement. So thx for trying to solve this. But lot of work is missing (and as already be done in the Peter's spec). As such, if I would review this package, I would just put a "-", with the reason "Not enought work to review". Actually the potential reviewers that has already been involved in the mldonkey review, wouldn't play with reviewing the same package twice. If you can find a reviewer that could review the package from the start, I will have nothing about this. So please co-ordinate with Peter work. And I hope you understand my point of view. @Peter As I said from the livna review, some dependencies are still missing to just work normally after a yum install. Either you or Richard, need to be the primary maintainer of the package. You need to solve this together even if you may not know each other very well for now. So please start proposing things... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435433] Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291220.m1TCK2gQ006896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2008-02-29 07:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 1)make command should be using parallel make > make %{?_smp_mflags} Right. > 2)your build section should be > %configure > make CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} This package doesn't use autotools and its configure script accepts compiler flags as parameters. What would be the reason no to use that? I can change it, of course. > 3) make install should be called as > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" I found nothing like this in the guidelines. I might have overlooked it of course. Could you point me at the reasoning for this please? > 4) %files section should look like > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README TODO > %{_bindir}/ocrad > %{_mandir}/man1/* > %{_infodir}/ocrad.info.gz The package installs info and manual pages with +x permission. Therefore I need the %attr otherwise rpmlint would complain. > 5) missing requires > Requires(post): /sbin/install-info > Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info Right. As for the building problem: my rawhide mock failed to update, so I built the package on F-8... But there are no shiny new gcc-4.3 C++ headers. This will require a patch. Thanks for looking. I'll post an update after I solve the compilation errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433143] Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291225.m1TCPqRq015177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 07:25 EST ------- Reply to comment 6: I think we should ditch my package and go with the livna one (but in Fedora, so the spec & SRPM copied here and adjusted if necessary for any Fedora policy). ocaml-find-provides/requires aren't really necessary because mldonkey doesn't have any OCaml library component (AFAIK). I don't mind being maintainer or co-maintainer if one is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434703] Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291230.m1TCUqHJ008925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-sqlite - OCaml library for accessing SQLite3 databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434703 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-02-29 07:30 EST ------- Thanks, it was a missing BR. I built this one under mock this time, so it should work: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sqlite.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-sqlite-0.23.0-2.fc9.src.rpm * Fri Feb 29 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.23.0-2 - Added BR ocaml-camlp4-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291229.m1TCTklp008324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 07:29 EST ------- Once setting NEEDINFO to Axel. Would you package static archive (if shared library is impossible for now) and reupload the new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 12:58:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:58:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253564] Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291258.m1TCwoMw020815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camomile - Unicode library for OCaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253564 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |434560 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 13:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 08:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291331.m1TDVjFS020157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 08:31 EST ------- Just tried to rebuild but it failed at least on x86_64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=478909 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 14:03:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:03:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435433] Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291403.m1TE3e8K026916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocrad -- An Optical Character Recognition program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435433 ------- Additional Comments From tsmetana at redhat.com 2008-02-29 09:03 EST ------- Please take a look at the updated version: Spec URL: http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ocrad/ocrad.spec SRPM URL: http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ocrad/ocrad-0.17-2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 14:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291408.m1TE8G4d027854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com 2008-02-29 09:08 EST ------- Okidoc, done, ask me if there is anything else missing, Daniel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 14:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291451.m1TEpbin003596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 09:51 EST ------- Ah.. I didn't notice this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket. So, now as pysvn itself is okay: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 14:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433814] Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291456.m1TEuwst004983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kuftp - Graphical FTP client for the K Desktop Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433814 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 14:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208675] Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291459.m1TExnRE011691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208675 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide jima at beer.tclug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jima at beer.tclug.org 2008-02-29 09:59 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: miau New Branches: EL-5 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435303] Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291522.m1TFM8cn009973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-LibMagic - perl interface to LibMagic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435303 josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(josh.kayse at gtri.ga| |tech.edu) | ------- Additional Comments From josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu 2008-02-29 10:22 EST ------- Thanks for the feedback. I've created a patch that fixes the tests and I've gotten it to build against rawhide. I've updated the spec and the rpm. Spec: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic.spec SRPM: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jkayse/perl-File-LibMagic/perl-File-LibMagic-0.85-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:25:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291525.m1TFPPsc010763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-29 10:25 EST ------- LinLog-0.3-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:27:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291527.m1TFR8gB017011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-29 10:27 EST ------- LinLog-0.3-4.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:29:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291529.m1TFTxsY011260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 10:29 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=296366) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296366&action=view) patch for dotconf.m4 to remove warning Almost okay, please fix below. * doc/Makefile* are not needed for %doc * For now when I call autotools, warnings are printed out like: -------------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_DOTCONF /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal --------------------------------------------------------------------- The attached patch should remove these warnings. * Please change the permission of the tarball in srpm to 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291549.m1TFnhYa021387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-29 10:49 EST ------- Thank You Kanarip for the review. Thank You nirik for handling cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 15:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris at zenoss.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dev.zenoss.org/downloads/rpm/zenoss-2.1.72.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.zenoss.org/downloads/rpm/zenoss-2.1.72-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: Zenoss Core (trunk build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:22:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 429202] Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291622.m1TGMSBG024543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblqr-1 - LiquidRescale library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429202 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 11:22 EST ------- Please change the permission of files in srpm to 0644. - This package (liblqr-1) is okay - Your another review request (bug 314871) needs fixing on some points, however I hope it can be approved after some fixes. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (liblqr-1) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:23:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291623.m1TGNRG9030350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 11:23 EST ------- Once liblqr-1 is imported on devel branch, I will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291620.m1TGK724029978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com Summary|Review Request:
- |Management System ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-29 11:20 EST ------- zenoss requires zope .. and zope requires python2.4 which is older than what included in fedora which is python2.5. nonetheless, i would love to see this package reviewed and its issue of using bundled apps to be resolved. It can stay in RPMFusion while waiting for zope to work on py2.5 (or fedora change its decision, and include py2.4) @Chris, This gonna be a lot of work. IMO, what u need to do first, is separate the ZenossCore codes into one tarball on its own. All of the 3rd party dependencies which is built by the rpm, you will need to change it to use a dependency from Fedora's own package collection ( if its not yet in fedora repo, submit a package for it). Then, you will need to change the install location out of /opt, and put the files in their respective directories in /usr/. I am not assigning this bug to me. It would be better if someone more experienced do this review. - kagesenshi - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291625.m1TGPIdW025304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 ------- Additional Comments From mohd.izhar.firdaus at gmail.com 2008-02-29 11:25 EST ------- s/"RPMFusion"/"RPMFusion and EPEL"/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:40:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431098] Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291640.m1TGeuWn001422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gambas2 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431098 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-02-29 11:40 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=478886 2.2.1-2 built. :) SRPM is in the link, I can put it in my webspace if needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291642.m1TGg3QO001621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-29 11:42 EST ------- I will certainly have a look, as time permit. One thing is that there is a Requires for mysql-server. This looks suspicious to me, I think that it should be possible to use a distant server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:48:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291648.m1TGmKLD003133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 ------- Additional Comments From chris at zenoss.com 2008-02-29 11:48 EST ------- The Zope 2.8 and Python 2.4 issue isn't going to be resolved for quite some time. The Zope folks removed a relationship change notification mechanism in 2.9 that we rely heavily on. That keeps us with Zope 2.8 and Python 2.4 for the foreseeable future. The other issue we have is that we have had to patch OSS libraries to fix some of their bugs. We've pushed those patches upstream but some of them have not yet been included in the mainstream release. Here's a list of the libraries we use AND have patched: * MySQL-python-1.2.0 * Python-2.4.4 * Twisted-2.5.0 * ctypes-1.0.1 * epydoc-3.0beta1 * pycrypto-1.9a6 * pyip-0.7 * rrdtool-1.2.26 Here's a list of the libraries we use that are clean: * Yapps-2.1.1 * Zope-2.8.8 * freetype-2.1.9 * libart_lgpl-2.3.17 * libpng-1.2.8-config * libsmi-0.4.5 * nagios-plugins-1.4.5 * pynetsnmp-0.28.6 * pyparsing-1.4.3 * python-snpp-1.1.1 * sendpage-1.000001 * setuptools-0.6c7 * simplejson-1.4 * wmi-0.1.10 We could possibly rely on RPMs for the libs we don't patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291649.m1TGn7TA029523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 ------- Additional Comments From chris at zenoss.com 2008-02-29 11:49 EST ------- We support a distant MySQL server. What do you recommend we Require: ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291658.m1TGwkkh005166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-29 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The other issue we have is that we have had to patch OSS libraries to fix some > of their bugs. We've pushed those patches upstream but some of them have not > yet been included in the mainstream release. In that case you'll have to have a look at the corresponding rpms in fedora, and contact the maintainer with your patch (through bugzilla) if the fix isn't already in the fedora/epel rpm. The maintainers are listed in the package database, doc is at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingPackagedb You already know where bugzilla is ;) The fedora and epel cvs is documented (rapidly) here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs For RHEL you have to grab the srpm and look within. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 16:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208675] Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291656.m1TGuxL0004985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miau - Full-featured IRC bouncer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208675 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-29 11:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:01:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291701.m1TH1adi032032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-02-29 12:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > We support a distant MySQL server. What do you recommend we Require: ? Nothing! I mean not mysql-server. You can document in a README.dist for example that a user may install mysql-server on a fedora/RHEL box to have a mysql server to use with zenoss, but it is outside of the scope of package dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291704.m1TH44L0006317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-29 12:04 EST ------- cvs done. Please make sure to file a bug and block bug 239077 for the ppc build issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291707.m1TH7IkQ000862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-02-29 12:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291705.m1TH5tIX006897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 jonathansteffan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathansteffan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jonathansteffan at gmail.com 2008-02-29 12:05 EST ------- You should push your patches for: * MySQL-python-1.2.0 * Python-2.4.4 * Twisted-2.5.0 * ctypes-1.0.1 * epydoc-3.0beta1 * pycrypto-1.9a6 * pyip-0.7 * rrdtool-1.2.26 to upstream ;-) Though, I think python 2.4.x will get no more updates from upstream, so that might be the same for the other packages. I've looked at and used zenoss for a little while (and looked into some of the cool Zope stuff it does) but don't have it in production. If I had access to packages, I'd most likely have it in production. I agree with kagesenshi that the best place for the stack is going to be 3rd party, unless you are able to merge your patches upstream or publish clean patches that can be applied to an upstream source tar and then listed in the spec while, of course, not breaking anything. I would, however, enjoy seeing zenoss in the [default] fedora repos. I don't know about it actually happening with patched (and unreleased?) packages and lack of py2.4 support. Zenoss has a unique situation, due to being in the RHX, where they might be able to poke contacts to get python 2.4 support. I will note I brought this up at the last RH Summit and knew this day would come at some point. As I use Zope/Plone extensively, there are python 2.4 packages @ Livna right now. I have to add a few more xml related packages and setuptools here soon but it supports Zope <= 2.10.5 ( I should say versions that run on py2.4 ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291712.m1THCXw0001824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-29 12:12 EST ------- Well, perhaps for packaging issues this is almost okay, however: - To make it sure that this package can be rebuilt from open sources really, first please remove all pre-rebuilt binaries (like .jar) at %prep. - In the review we have to check the licenses of all codes in the tarball to make it sure that the codes used for jruby are used with keeping legal compatibility. Would you write the summary about what licenses are used in what files in the tarball so that we can check legal issues easily? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:13:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:13:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291713.m1THDmsZ002035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-29 12:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Alright, in this case, go back to static, drop the shared, and we'll call it good. What should be the name, ffcall, ffcall-devel, or ffcall-static? > Will this build on ppc? It should, since clisp previously built on ppc (but not ppc64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 17:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291723.m1THNMk4009925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-29 12:23 EST ------- 1 package, called ffcall. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435042] Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291808.m1TI8ajc017819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpsman - GPS data manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435042 sconklin at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From sconklin at redhat.com 2008-02-29 13:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpsman Short Description: GPS data manager Owners: sconklin, bjensen Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226559] Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291819.m1TIJM3V013689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xhtml1-dtds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226559 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-02-29 13:19 EST ------- Ok, commit succeeded, thanks! I'm a bit unsure how to proceed with this review - as far as I'm concerned current devel branch in CVS is fine and ready to be approved but as I was the one who did the specfile rewrite and other changes, maybe it's more appropriate if someone else looks at it...? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:22:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435496] New: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/notify-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/notify-sharp-0.4.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291826.m1TIQ0K5015393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2008-02-29 13:25 EST ------- http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall-1.10-1.fc7.src.rpm http://math.ifi.uzh.ch/fedora/tmp/ffcall.spec Disabled generating debuginfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435496] Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291824.m1TIObwZ014819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |435498 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435498] Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291824.m1TIObxX014794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435498 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |435496 ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-29 13:24 EST ------- Block on 435496 as this requires notify-sharp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435498] New: Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435498 Summary: Review Request: giver - Easy network filesharing application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/giver.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/giver-0.1.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Easy network filesharing application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435500] New: Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435500 Summary: Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gnomeuser at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/tasky.spec SRPM URL: http://dnielsen.fedorapeople.org/tasky-0.1.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Todo list with Remember The Milk integration Note: Upstream intends to change the name in the near future to avoid naming conflicts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:26:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435496] Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291826.m1TIQqK7021544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: notify-sharp - Managed desktop notification implementation for .NET https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435496 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |435500 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:26:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435500] Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291826.m1TIQp24021519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tasky - Todo list with Remember The Milk integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435500 gnomeuser at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |435496 ------- Additional Comments From gnomeuser at gmail.com 2008-02-29 13:26 EST ------- Block on 435496 as this requires notify-sharp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:32:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291832.m1TIWdbG016896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-29 13:32 EST ------- dxcc-20080225-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291833.m1TIXNFN017111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-02-29 13:33 EST ------- dxcc-20080225-3.fc7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 18:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434904] Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291856.m1TIuiQE021118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dxcc - Small utility which determines the ARRL DXCC entity of a ham radio callsign https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434904 bob at fedoraunity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-29 13:56 EST ------- Thank you kanarip for the review. Thank you nirik for handing cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 19:29:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433738] Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291929.m1TJTtAp027165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xf86-video-nouveau - X.org nouveau driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433738 richard at hughsie.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |richard at hughsie.com ------- Additional Comments From richard at hughsie.com 2008-02-29 14:29 EST ------- Any way this could be pushed into F9 and the old source removed from xf-video-nv? Cheers guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 19:56:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434797] Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802291956.m1TJu0DZ005214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ffcall-devel - foreign function call interface (needed for clisp) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434797 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-02-29 14:55 EST ------- Ok, looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292007.m1TK7GYa007677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435508] New: cpdup not 64-bit clean Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 Summary: cpdup not 64-bit clean Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: michel.sylvan at gmail.com ReportedBy: michel.sylvan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description of problem: There are several places in cpdup's sources where it assumes sizeof(void *) == sizeof(int). This needs to be fixed. Also, there are some bizarre compilation problem -- syntactic ones -- that are only manifested when compiling against 64-bit system headers. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.07-1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Remove either ExcludeArch: x86_64 or ppc64 2. Rebuild on said architecture -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:15:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:15:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292015.m1TKFbbZ003418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-02-29 15:15 EST ------- OK. I was going to file the bug /after/ the package is approved, but I guess it can always be redirected to the right component, once the package is in the repository. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435508 (ps Parag, sorry, I meant to mention it when filing the review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433863] Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292021.m1TKLFjH010479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-29 15:21 EST ------- python-pysvn.src:24: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:26:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:26:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 433863] Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292026.m1TKQ7xL005432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-02-29 15:26 EST ------- rpmlint errors: python-pysvn.src:24: W: setup-not-quiet Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from unpacking the sources. python-pysvn.src: W: invalid-license Apache 2.0 - use "ASL 2.0" instead -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435514] New: Review Request: lbrickbuster2 - Brickbuster arcade game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435514 Summary: Review Request: lbrickbuster2 - Brickbuster arcade game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lbrickbuster2.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/lbrickbuster2-2.6-0.9.beta7.fc9.src.rpm Description: The successor to LBrickBuster offers you a new challenge in more than 50 levels with loads of new bonuses (goldshower, joker, explosive balls, bonus magnet ...), maluses (chaos, darkness, weak balls, malus magnet ...) and special bricks (growing bricks, explosive bricks, regenerative bricks ...). If you are still hungry for more after that you can create your own levelsets with the integrated level editor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 20:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 432310] Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292047.m1TKlOif015480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-02-29 15:47 EST ------- Erm, ping? This no longer seems needed, so perhaps it should be closed, or ... ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 21:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 434630] Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292122.m1TLMFM2022079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-perl4caml - OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434630 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-29 16:22 EST ------- That rpmlint complaint is indeed weird, but I agree with your assessment that it's not problematic. This is yet another package that doesn't specify any version of the LGPL. How did you determine that it's not LGPLv2+? I thought that linking with ocaml libraries might force the issue, but the base ocaml package in rawhide doesn't even have a valid license tag so that's no help. Does this package handle the perl modules it wraps not being installed at builr or runtime? It still seems to build the Net::Google stuff, for example, even though that package isn't required at all. And that begs the question of whether those perl packages are actually needed at runtime. The package builds without them and I didn't see any differences in the resulting package. I checked the build log for gcc calls and I noticed that the compiler isn't being called with the proper set of flags. It looks like the flags are specified directly in the Makefile. They should probably match up with %optflags although I'm not sure what would happen if -g was passed since debuginfo isn't being generated. * source files match upstream: 56f3f6e5cb02dfb9f319cdc1c761586d573c6ecc14639e186a9783d253934d3d perl4caml-0.9.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * ocaml packaging guidelies are followed. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. ? BuildRequires may be excessive. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-perl4caml-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm dllperl4caml.so()(64bit) ocaml(Perl) = 62ffc8b090d3554adbdf29a2b91809b0 ocaml(Pl_Data_Dumper) = 46141594dfbf6ad5d7f8fe499dbb5602 ocaml(Pl_Date_Calc) = 81309d39376fa4c47fd03e919dd278df ocaml(Pl_Date_Format) = a08a10d6da6a544612bd0ffdb359f18a ocaml(Pl_Date_Parse) = 44f3f7ef90b613ae8400caa859bf403d ocaml(Pl_HTML_Element) = 5db46ddac9327df9be091e1aa5a55892 ocaml(Pl_HTML_Form) = 8d3305d588ce5543dc6f0b5ee217c3e9 ocaml(Pl_HTML_Parser) = df42b14d7519e0affaf2260777e063e6 ocaml(Pl_HTML_TreeBuilder) = ca4eb08fe160b9e7baf34592ccf04ad8 ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Cookies) = 14c83b6408189bbd38318b1cfb8fd0d8 ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Headers) = 19b0ed2af45c31f51c023967b9f6acaf ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Message) = 3fb2d4309ab697c1fa0b2319e1af17c3 ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Request) = 5e5dba683d5c2996df9c44fd2f3571fd ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Request_Common) = 528fe8dfa8822dcd758a0187fee7b975 ocaml(Pl_HTTP_Response) = f92917d741a3502dcda657ff9a889610 ocaml(Pl_LWP_UserAgent) = c85c04042060d5c093f00109a54290ba ocaml(Pl_Net_Google_Cache) = a0b7834c394b63bc91704beca3d3d122 ocaml(Pl_Net_Google) = d420a90f979db3e91eb6ba827a903be7 ocaml(Pl_Net_Google_Response) = b839208e102c02061f7268b0fa8da715 ocaml(Pl_Net_Google_Search) = 55086cc7adb3bd1b5acf687f8a5405db ocaml(Pl_Net_Google_Spelling) = 24181dfa9009a3375340ca9631720cc8 ocaml(Pl_Template) = 492b2c675a77fe96b3867b6465d7397f ocaml(Pl_URI) = 451cd0d14a52791c57df8b0e8da1cd18 ocaml(Pl_WWW_Mechanize) = a180ccd19ff5bb9cd910199d2926ac30 ocaml-perl4caml = 0.9.4-1.fc9 = libperl.so()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) ocaml(Callback) = e5ca1fb5990fac2b7b17cbb1712cffe2 ocaml(CamlinternalOO) = 6d0d5b328d6db88f403ca4393b4abd38 ocaml(Int32) = 711321870c949bd3bbdd092d9bae92e4 ocaml(List) = da1ce9168f0408ff26158af757456948 ocaml(Nativeint) = e79cdc4d3575c2ed044955cb7ef49aca ocaml(Obj) = 5cfae708052c692ea39d23ed930fd64d ocaml(Pervasives) = 8ba3d1faa24d659525c9025f41fd0c57 ocaml(String) = 2c162ab314b2f0a2cfd22d471b2e21ab ocaml(runtime) = 3.10.1 ocaml-perl4caml-devel-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm perl(TestClass) ocaml-perl4caml-devel = 0.9.4-1.fc9 = ocaml-perl4caml = 0.9.4-1.fc9 * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests succeeded. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files (except permitted COPYING.LIB file) * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. The actual documentation is ~80% of the -devel package, but it's not in the main package so I have no problem with it. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 22:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292248.m1TMmYUp031782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 ------- Additional Comments From bob at fedoraunity.org 2008-02-29 17:48 EST ------- I am going to stall this review for a couple days, Upstream has other related packages I would like to also get in to the review process, they all will need similar fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Feb 29 23:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200802292341.m1TNfuNd008024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From pablo.martin-gomez at laposte.net 2008-02-29 18:41 EST ------- So what can we do ? Have we an other solution than use the previous method and commit a RFE bug for redhat-menu ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.