[Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 1 09:58:28 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007





------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net  2008-02-01 04:58 EST -------
Ok, this is exactly what I suspected: tried to change the README file delivered
by tunables-base-data, and here's the result I got:

<snip>
D: opening  db index       /var/lib/rpm/Name create mode=0x42
D:  read h#     913 Header SHA1 digest: OK
(4c878e96685b21513e679f21dc15cc800d901239)
D:  read h#     917 Header SHA1 digest: OK
(16ffc11b812ff117879d896cc00e7e5ac100d998)
D: computing 5 file fingerprints
Preparing...                D: computing file dispositions
D: opening  db index       /var/lib/rpm/Basenames create mode=0x42
########################################### [100%]
        package tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 is already installed
        file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of
tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package
tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-4.fc8
        file /usr/share/libtune/doc/README from install of
tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8 conflicts with file from package
tunables-base-data-2.6.21-0.14-5.fc8
D: closed   db index       /var/lib/rpm/Basenames
D: closed   db index       /var/lib/rpm/Name
D: closed   db index       /var/lib/rpm/Packages
D: closed   db environment /var/lib/rpm/Packages
D: May free Score board((nil))
[root at akt i386]# echo $?
1

So sounds like it is normal to be able to install a newer version over an older
one without conflicts problems, given that the common files have the same contents.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list