[Bug 431310] Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 3 01:02:17 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: color-filesystem - Color filesystem layout


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431310


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-02-02 20:02 EST -------
The build dependency on gawk isn't needed at all; you might as well get rid of
it. It's needed in the kde-filesystem package because that specfile actually
calls awk.

Packaging-wise, I see nothing wrong with this package.  It only contains three
directories (two empty) and one set of RPM macros, and macro usage, specfile
naming, package naming, permissions, dependencies and directory ownership are
all OK.  On that I'm inclined to approve this.

However, I wonder at the need to make a separate filesystem package for three
directories, and the annoyance at needing something to provide color-filesystem
forever once this gets in even if it turns out it's not a good idea.  Has anyone
talked to the maintainer of the filesystem package to see if these three
directories could be added?  The same goes for the rpm folks and the macros.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list