[Bug 316141] Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Feb 6 08:22:16 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-02-06 03:22 EST -------
Whole license: SISSL
source/3rdparty/adoc/ GPL+ -> unused
source/3rdparty/fnmatch/ BSD with advertising -> unused
source/3rdparty/openssl/ OpenSSL -> unused
source/3rdparty/qidl/ copyright only -> unused
source/3rdparty/qmake/ GPL+ -> Installed as qmake
source/3rdparty/qmake/alloca.c Public Domain? -> unused
source/3rdparty/qmake/amiga.c GPLv2+ -> Installed as qmake
(and others)
! Note
qmake is not linked or used by other parts
of gridengine
source/3rdparty/qmon/Xbae/ MIT
source/3rdparty/qmon/Xmt310/ BSD
source/3rdparty/qmon/iconlist/ MIT
source/3rdparty/qmon/ltree/ LGPL+
source/3rdparty/qmon/spinbox/ MIT
source/3rdparty/qmon/tab/ MIT
source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ BSD with advertising -> unused
source/3rdparty/qtcsh/ma.setp.c MIT -> unused
source/3rdparty/sge_depend/ MIT
source/3rdparty/snprintf/ the Frontier Artistic License -> unused
source/3rdparty/strptime/ BSD with advertising -> unused
source/scripts/ldAix MIT -> unused
==================================================================================
For -4:
* Licensing
- Seeing "Multiple Licensing Scenarios" and
"Mixed Source Licensing Scenario" of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines,
I propose the following spec file description.
IMO it is better that some file to explain about licensing
should be added into %doc (proposal text attached)
Then the spec file description regarding to license should be:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: gridengine
Version: 6.1u3
Release: 4%{?dist}
Summary: Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
.......
Group: Applications/System
# Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is
# under GPLv2+, which is not used or linked by other parts
# of gridengine.
License: (BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL) and GPLv2+
.......
.......
%package devel
Summary: Gridengine development files
Group: Development/Libraries
License: BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
.......
.......
%files
.......
%{_libdir}/libjgdi.so
%{_libdir}/libjuti.so
# Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is
# under GPLv2+
%{_libexecdir}/gridengine/
.......
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Services with enabled by default
- The two service sgeexecd, sgemaster are enabled by default by
only installing rpm packages, which is usually undesirable.
See the explanation of
$ rpmlint -I service-default-enabled.
* %post -p /sbin/ldconfig
- When /sbin/ldconfig call is written *in one line* like above,
"Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig" is automatically added to
the corresponding binary rpm.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list