[Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite
Alias: fedora-ds

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368





------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com  2008-02-06 21:48 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries
> taking precedence.  Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only
> get the preferred architecture.

Ok.  I guess at that point I can then make fedora-ds noarch?
 
> Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway?  Is there any reason why
> you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64?

Is it multilib?  What makes it multilib?  I don't think there is any reason to
run the 32-bit version on x86_64.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.