[Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Feb 11 20:24:26 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181


tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review?,             |fedora-review+
                   |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu)|




------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-02-11 15:24 EST -------
Aargh, setting needinfo made this drop out of my TODO list and I missed it when
I was going over my tickets this weekend.  I really wish needinfo worked better.

Anyway, the new package looks better, but there's a problem with the avoidance
of autoconf.

First off, if you're going to provide a built configure file, please just supply
it as Souce1: instead of patching it in.  A patch that does nothing more than
add a source file is rather strange.

But honestly, I'm not really sure that patching in the configure file is any
better than just generating it.  It has the benefit of not requiring the
autotools and not being dependent on the specific autotools versions that might
be installed on each release you're building on, so I guess it's no worse. 
Frankly I'm not really sure which is the right thing to do, but I've held this
ticket up long enough thinking about the issue.

So I'll go ahead and approve this, but please move the new configure file to a
source file instead of a patch before you check things in.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list