[Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: sox


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2008-02-16 09:10 EST -------
Hi Jirka,

I was thinking about using pkgconfig with sox-devel (and Requiring the related
libs there.) For what i've seen in devel, it only uses pkg-config at library
detection.

Well, see the attached patch.(which i don't expect to use unless approved by the
upstream project). There is maybe a better way to do this (i meant to use
AM_LDFLAGS to avoid_version seems a little hacky). Also it would be good to
provide a pkg-config detection for packages that need sox-devel (Work in
progress, but it will depend on the used scheme, either with or without libltdl,
which change a lot).

As a third part packager; I would provide a sox-libs-freeworld for the libmad
and others libs. Maybe that would need to define a more accurate %file section
for {_libdir}/sox/*.so .

For the amr part , as this is nonfree but also non-redistributable, I cannot
hold any sox-libs-nonfree package and that would be cared at end-users rebuild
of the freeworld package.
for info i've made a nosrc package for amr{nv,wb}, you can see here:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/nosrc/



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.