[Bug 433110] Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-tidy -  Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110


ondrejj at salstar.sk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |ondrejj at salstar.sk
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk  2008-02-17 06:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license
> > for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags.
> 
> Fixed.

Not fixed. Where do you see "BSD" in licenses? There is just one LICENSE file
which contain MIT license.

> The name is correct (as I read this, make most sense too:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d

OK, accepting this.

> > Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3
> 
> fixed

If you are using Requires: python >=2.5, set same version for python-devel

> See the fix, it's normal to have several licenses on a package.

On IRC guys told me, that public domain do not need to be mentioned here.
Just fix the "BSD" to "MIT". You can mention other licenses in comments of .spec
file.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.