[Bug 433292] Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 19 05:18:50 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lpsolve - OpenOffice.org 3.0 dependency Linear Programming (MILP) solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433292
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-02-19 00:18 EST -------
This builds cleanly and elicits only this from rpmlint:
lpsolve-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
which is OK.
Did you find somewhere any information on which versions of the LGPL are
permitted? I couldn't find anything besides LGPL (and the standard GPL notice
in the bison output, which doesn't matter). I believe that LGPLv2+ is
acceptable in this situation, but it would be good to clarify this with the
upstream developers if possible.
The compiler is called with just "-O3" when it should be called with the full
set of %{optflags}. This has the result of the debuginfo package being broken.
It looks like the ccc script will need to be patched to set "opts" to something
other than "-O3".
Actually the whole build thing is a bit weird. Does the Makefile that's there
not work? (It looks like it would still need patching anyway.)
* source files match upstream:
842d6c0fb72c8912c8747f096d07c01c1ecab137b8e5b90e41f94ddf2e5cd543
lp_solve_5.5.0.11_source.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
X compiler flags are not the required set.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X debuginfo package is not complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
lpsolve-5.5.0.11-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
liblpsolve55.so()(64bit)
lpsolve = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9
=
/sbin/ldconfig
lpsolve-devel-5.5.0.11-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
lpsolve-devel = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9
=
lpsolve = 5.5.0.11-1.fc9
* a shared library is installed; ldconfig is called properly. There are no
versioned .so files, so the unversioned one is properly in the main package.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (ldconfig)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list