[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Feb 28 16:17:41 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250
------- Additional Comments From michal at harddata.com 2008-02-28 11:17 EST -------
> "... and nothing has broken since ..."
That is a good hint but a pretty weak argument, appearences to the contrary.
If those files were used mostly for i386 and x86_64 then there are many
similarities here, including endianess. Checking in sources that a byte
compiler is indeed arch-independent would be a different matter.
I looked through installed "noarch" packages on one system and peeked
at such few which could be a subpackage; like 'gimp-help', for example.
They all appear to build separately; so this seems to support what
I said in comment #7. OTOH is there really any good reason for somebody
to try to install sawfish.i386 and sawfish.x86_64 at the same time
which would require two variants of librep and would cause conflicts
on files from "common"? I do not see any but possibly I miss something.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list