[Bug 435370] Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Feb 29 10:55:49 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435370





------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com  2008-02-29 05:55 EST -------
+ rpmlint output
  no output from rpmlint
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
  BSD
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
  there is no license file included
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  md5: 4f9d132f5a81d3f38b53267ae7af24a8
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  i386
? ExcludeArch bugs filed
  Please file ExcludeArch bugs if necessary, and post the bug numbers here.
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
+ binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
+ large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
  N/A
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
+ static libraries should be in -static
+ packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
+ libfoo.so must go in -devel
+ -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
+ packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
+ translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available
? reviewer should build the package in mock
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
? review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
+ pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin

--------

Please file those ExcludeArch bugs if necessary and put the
bug numbers here, and then I can approve this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list