From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 00:24:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:24:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427121] New: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grib_api.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grib_api-1.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Command line tools for interactive and batch processing of grib data. The grib_api-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use grib_api. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:40:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010240.m012ecZ3024476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:40 EST ------- any progress here? I see that there are couple of reviews of such type waiting for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 408171] Review Request: perl-QWizard - A portable graphical question and answer wizard API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010253.m012rxvj022267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-QWizard - A portable graphical question and answer wizard API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408171 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:53 EST ------- APPROVED package is already imported in CVS, therefore closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010254.m012s80p025741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:54 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010256.m012uC1k026433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rajeeshknambiar at gm | |ail.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:56 EST ------- Rajneesh, Have you started reviewing to others packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010256.m012upfX023028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:56 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 02:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:55:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010255.m012tI88022786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2007-12-31 21:55 EST ------- I guess time to move this package to rpmfusion. Do you get any progress ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 07:39:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 02:39:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010739.m017dotA024562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 02:39 EST ------- I received help from accounts at fedoraproject.org, solved the gpg problem, have signed the CLA, and received a successful confirmation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 07:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 02:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010748.m017mRmW028962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 02:48 EST ------- Would you check the following page? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem/Contact -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 08:31:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 03:31:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010831.m018V82i001680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-01 03:31 EST ------- There are missing eggs for Fedora>8. Updated spec file and source: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/python-xlrd.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/8/python-xlrd-0.6.1-4.fc8.src.rpm No response from original author more than a month. I am removing my approval to leave somebody else to make another review. After approval I want to be package maintainer in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 08:33:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 03:33:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801010833.m018XsKv030862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ondrejj at salstar.sk |lkundrak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 10:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 05:50:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427096] Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011050.m01AocPe020185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427096 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-01 05:50 EST ------- > I've made it a (private) policy of mine to at least attempt to include all direct dependencies needed for building, even those that are in turn required by other dependencies higher up in the chain. I've noticed :). I do that myself sometimes, especially when the deps chain is not identical on different versions of Fedora > The HTML documentation is in the -devel subpackage in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gtkimageview -- or do you mean something else? 1-0 for you here. I've seen the html folder in the build log but I did not notice it was packaged because of the longer [sub]directory name :) >Thanks for the prompt review My pleasure! > and have a good year 2008! All the best to you too. And to all the others involved in Fedora Collection :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 12:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 07:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011206.m01C6YP9026180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-01 07:06 EST ------- I've a comment about the name of the package. I think the name should be follow other packages names of gnome applet tools. so gnome-applet-sshmenu, should be more appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 12:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 07:13:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011213.m01CDWco030539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-01 07:13 EST ------- i'm talkin' about the summary of the bug as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 12:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 07:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011232.m01CWsQH000327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 07:32 EST ------- - Well, ruby script should not be installed under rubylibdir, it should be moved to sitelibdir. rubylibdir should be used by ruby scripts in ruby rpm (and its subrpms, like ruby-libs, ruby-tcltk,...) Also, for refering to the directories related to ruby, please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby - Also, as the directory where ruby script is installed is version specific, this package should have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 13:40:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:40:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011340.m01DeWqC009181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 08:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24) > Well, okay. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (cppad) is APPROVED by me > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please follow the procedure according to: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies > that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) I am uncertain if the text in parenthesis means that I should write up a new bug report for this project; i.e., restart a project review request ? > Then I will sponsor you. > > ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 13:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011354.m01Ds2wM006877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 08:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #31) > > (at the stage, please also write on > > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) > > I am uncertain if the text in parenthesis means that I should write up a new bug > report for this project; i.e., restart a project review request ? > Please read the section "Get a Fedora Account" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join ------------------------------------------------------------- At the bottom, where it says "Add new membership", put cvsextras in Groupname. Leave Role Type as user, and Role Domain empty. * Once this is submitted, your account will show up as "pending" to all of the Fedora Package Collection sponsors (who will receive an email). ------------------------------------------------------------- At this stage sponsor member should receive a mail that you have requested sponsorship. But I want to make sure with what account name you requested. So when you have done this stage, please also write in this stage that you actually requested sponsorship with your Fedora account name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 13:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011357.m01DvRwE011196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From tuju at iki.fi 2008-01-01 08:57 EST ------- Is there already pkgs available in updates-testing/koji? I've a system waiting for this and could do some testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 14:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011440.m01EeeFu017196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 09:40 EST ------- I think that I know what happened. On the web page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join under Get a Fedora Account the following text appears Once this is submitted, your account will show up as "pending" to all of the Fedora Package Collection sponsors (who will receive an email). Because the word "submitted" was used, I chose the "Submit" button in stead of the "Add" button in the Fedora Account Login window. I will try selecting the "Add" button and see if this works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 15:26:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011526.m01FQwEb023230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 10:26 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 15:27:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011527.m01FRLw5019554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 15:49:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011549.m01Fnsh0022034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-01-01 10:49 EST ------- FYI: %changelog entry from Enrico's clamav commit in CVS yesterday: - ship original sources again; unrar is now licensed correctly (no more stolen code put under GPL) [...] ...so maybe this package could be resurrected after merging the codebase with the clamav sources? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 16:09:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 319831] Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011609.m01G9tPC024911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unrar - RAR archive extractor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319831 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-01 11:09 EST ------- No. The unrar license is itself not-permissable for Fedora, and we cannot even ship the source code, due to clause 6 of the unrar license: "If you don't agree with terms of the license you must remove UnRAR files from your storage devices and cease to use the utility." I would really prefer that upstream clamav pull out libclamunrar*, as there is no possible universe in which it can be enabled and legally redistributed, however, in the interim, we need to remove it ourselves. Enrico, can you do this, or would you like me to handle it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 16:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011628.m01GSJCi030983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 11:28 EST ------- I am working through some of the steps in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and am currently at Add Package to CVS and Set Owner which directs me to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure In these procedures it states: "After your package is approved by the Package Review Process, you may request for a CVS module to be created. Please copy this template into your Bugzilla comment, and set fedora-cvs flag to ?" The problem is that when I select "Requests" near the top of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi there is no field labeled "comment" (to be filled in with the appropriate text). Perhaps one is not supposed to create a new item using the "Requests" tab for this step of the procedures ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 16:39:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 11:39:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011639.m01GdtRV032224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 11:39 EST ------- The CVSAdminProcedure wiki page says that you have to - copy the template into _this_ bug ticket - fill in the blank as Example - and set fedora-cvs flag seen below in _this_ bug to ? . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 17:32:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011732.m01HWfY5003142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 12:32 EST ------- I want to be certain before submitting the a fedora-cvs request with the following field values Package Name: cppad Short Description: A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms Owners: bradbell Cvsextras Commits: yes Perhaps your fedora account name (mtasaka) should be added to the or Owners or InitialCC fields. Perhaps a Branches entry should be added, but the following text from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure seems to indicate that is not necessary: "The devel branch is implicit and always created, so you need not list it." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 17:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011739.m01HdEGV003970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 12:39 EST ------- You don't have to add my FAS name to CC or owners. If you want to do, you can. As written the current valid branches are F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 OLPC-2. For example, if you want to maintain this package on Fedora 8, you have to add "Branches: F-8". Only "devel" branch is automatically created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 17:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011734.m01HYa7I003302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 12:34 EST ------- spot, would you check if the following files are GPLv2 (strict) compatible? --------------------------------------------------------------------- tombupnp/upnp/src/inc/upnp_md5.h tombupnp/upnp/src/uuid/upnp_md5.c --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 17:58:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011758.m01HwO96006395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 12:58 EST ------- Also, how does this application treats MP3? (I am not familiar with this application) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Multimedia/MP3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 18:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:10:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011810.m01IAFUU008379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 bradbell at seanet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-01 13:10 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cppad Short Description: A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms Owners: bradbell Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 18:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] New: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ondrejj at salstar.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/sagator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.salstar.sk/pub/sagator/fedora/testing/8/SRPMS/sagator-1.0.0-0beta31.fc8.src.rpm Description: This program is an email antivirus/antispam gateway. It is an interface to the postfix, sendmail, or any other smtpd, which runs antivirus and/or spamchecker. Its modular architecture can use any combination of antivirus/spamchecker according to configuration. It has some internal checkers (string_scanner and regexp_scanner). Sagator can parse MIME mails and decompress archives, if it is configured so. Features: * modular antivirus/spamchecker support * you don't need any perl modules or any other modules, only python * you can return any quarantined mail to mailq/user mailbox * mailbox/maildir scanning and mailbox cleaning * nice statistics via RRDTOOL or MRTG * web-quarantine access for users * daily reports for users * SQL database logging and configuration * simple chroot support ----------------------------------------------------------- rpmlint displays some errors and warnings, but I think there are not resolvable in this package. I can fix only spurious-executable-perm problems, but with reduced functionality. These are scripts in documentation, which can help user to configure services for sagator and test sagator's functionality. The non-standard-* errors are caused because sagator requires a new user (vscan here), under which runs. This user is created in post script. Version of this package is beta, because I (as author of this program) want to add final fedora spec file in a stable release. This version is perfectly stable for me and there are no known problems now. It fixes some issues found in latest stable and removes obsolete scanners. I don't want to push into fedora current stable, because users can use obsolete functions, which was removed in this release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 19:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 14:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801011923.m01JNGDm021198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-01 14:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: freefem++ Short Description: PDE solving tool Owners: rathann Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 21:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:30:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012130.m01LUaIS002055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-01 16:30 EST ------- OK taking this one: First the rpmlint warnings/errors: ----------------- > libselinux.x86_64: W: invalid-license Public domain > libselinux.x86_64: W: invalid-license uncopyrighted ----------------- The license tag is indeed invalid it should be "Public Domain" See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ----------------- > libselinux.x86_64: W: no-url-tag ----------------- Why? Please add an URL tag pointing to the upstream homepage ----------------- > libselinux-python.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/selinux.py ----------------- As this file is not intended to be executed directly chmod -x it (mode 0644 not 0755) (If it is then please add a shebang) ----------------- libselinux-python.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized python bindings for libselinux ----------------- OK thats an easy one ;) ----------------- libselinux-python.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The libselinux-python package contains the python bindings for developing SELinux ----------------- Please split this into 80 char lines. ----------------- Now general comments to the spec file: >%files devel >%defattr(-,root,root) >%{_libdir}/libselinux.a Please remove this file or if you want to ship it for some reason place it in a -static subpackage. ------ >%files python >%defattr(-,root,root,0755) >%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/_selinux.so >%{_libdir}/python*/site-packages/selinux.py* Instead of {_libdir}/python*/site-packages do this: Add %{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} to the top of the spec file and use %{python_sitelib} instead. ------ >%build >make clean >make CFLAGS="-g %{optflags}" swigify >make CFLAGS="-g %{optflags}" all pywrap Please append %{?_smp_mflags} to the make calls (if it does not break the build). ==== If you want I can attach a patch with the changes mentioned above to help speeding up the review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 21:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:53:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] New: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxx at krakoa.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/textflow.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/8/SRPMS/textflow-0.2.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: TextFlow is a programmers text editor written in Python. Also needed is a new .desktop file which can be found here: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/textflow.desktop rpmlint gives one error: missing documentation. However no documentation is included in the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 22:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012221.m01ML8JQ008528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-01 17:21 EST ------- My understanding is that it only shows the tags listed using id3 whatever codecs you have on your computer is what it plays so technically it would only play Ogg on a default Fedora install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 22:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] New: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman-1.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: If you are looking for a tool for tuning SQL statements, manage tables, views, or triggers, administrate the database space and index statistics then Sqliteman is the perfect choice. If you are looking for a graphical queries creation wizards, user interface designers for your database, or an universal report tool try the applications designed for tasks such this (Kexi, knoda). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 22:33:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012233.m01MXuN8012811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-01 17:33 EST ------- Currently Supported Features *browse and playback your media via UPnP *metadata extraction from mp3, ogg, flac, jpeg, etc. files. That was the word I was looking for metadata extraction it uses the driver's off your system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 23:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 18:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 233975] Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012310.m01NA9JJ017762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freefem++ - PDE solving tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233975 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-01 18:10 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 23:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 18:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012316.m01NG2GX018520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-01 18:16 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 1 23:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 18:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427096] Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801012318.m01NIj5j018668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427096 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-01 18:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 00:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020005.m0205n6T025044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From jafo at tummy.com 2008-01-01 19:05 EST ------- Fair enough. I spent most of November and December out of town at a client site, so I haven't had much time to look at it until today. Thanks for offering to take the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 00:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020027.m020Rq8j024451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(dchen at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-01-01 19:27 EST ------- Just one curious question. If we do need to put source C codes in some convient place, which package should I include these sources? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 00:32:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020032.m020WGWV025080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-01 19:32 EST ------- I would be happy to review this and look at sponsoring you... expect a full review in a bit here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 00:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020056.m020uRWr027984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-01 19:56 EST ------- After looking, I think it might be best to use the upstream docbook source and build subpackages for html, txt, pdf, etc. Would you be willing to take a stab at doing that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 01:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 20:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020131.m021VfjY032606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-01 20:31 EST ------- Yep I'll give that a go I'll speak to stickster or those in the docs project for advice on the docbook and how to go about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 03:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020316.m023GSZI013467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-01-01 22:16 EST ------- Another question about %post and %postun When doing: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig rpm -e libsvm reports: /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `0' used to build cache error: %postun(libsvm-2.84-9.fc8.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 But, it passed when I wrote like: %post /sbin/ldconfig #%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun /sbin/ldconfig What format should I use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 03:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020337.m023bJtT016663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-01 22:37 EST ------- For 0.10.0-1 * Requires - Requires: id3lib, file, sqlite, js" are redundant. rpmbuild examines the dependencies of libraries and adds them to the rebuilt binary rpms automatically. For example, "rpm -q --requires mediatomb" contains libid3-3.8.so.3, which should pull id3lib automatically - And please verify if "mysql" itself is needed. If only "mysql-libs" is needed, "Requires: mysql" should be removed. * Conditional BuildRequires - build.log says: -------------------------------------------------------------- 327 CONFIGURATION SUMMARY ---- 328 329 sqlite3 : yes 330 mysql : yes 331 libjs : yes 332 libmagic : yes 333 inotify : yes 334 libexif : yes 335 id3lib : yes 336 taglib : disabled 337 libextractor : disabled -------------------------------------------------------------- Please explain why you don't want to support taglib or libextrator (both are already in Fedora repo) * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files, please use --------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------- While sometimes this does not work, this method usually works for recent Makefiles. - When using "install" or "cp" commands, please use "-p" option to keep timestamps, for example: ---------------------------------------------------------------- install -p -D -m0755 scripts/mediatomb-service-fedora %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/mediatomb ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Unowned files/directories - $ cat -n /etc/rc.d/init.d/mediatomb returns: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 57 mkdir -p "/$MT_HOME/$MT_CFGDIR" 58 chown nobody "/$MT_HOME/$MT_CFGDIR" ---------------------------------------------------------------- So actually mediatomb service creates /etc/mediatomb/ directory with the owner nobody. However, this directory is not owned by any rpms: ---------------------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C rpm -qf /etc/mediatomb/ file /etc/mediatomb is not owned by any package ---------------------------------------------------------------- * /etc/mediatomb must be owned by mediatomb with owner nobody * Also, IMO all files under /etc/mediatomb must be owned by mediatomb (perhaps by using %ghost) * Usually service should use its unique user/group. You can refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups * scriptlets/Requires for services (post, preun, etc) - scriptlets/Requires for mediatomb service are wrong. Please check the section "Services" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Also, please check the section "Syntax" "Scriptlet Ordering" of the same wiki page. * Documents - The file "INSTALL" is usually needed for people who want to install the software by themselves and is not needed when people installs it using rpm. ! Note: Please make it sure that you change the release number of spec file each time you modify your spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 03:51:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020351.m023pokT019064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-01 22:51 EST ------- There is a choice to use sqlite or mysql I've added both as dependencies depending on which one the user wants to use. I will adjust the other errors and upload a new one shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 04:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] New: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta-0.0.1-0.1.20080102svn755662.fc8.src.rpm Description: This is the replacement for khexedit, which has been dropped from kdeutils for the KDE 4.0 release. The RPM %description follows: Okteta allows the user to load data from any file, view and edit it in either hex or ASCII. Okteta uses the KDE 4 libraries. I tested the package on F8 i386 and it starts up fine and loads all the files I tried correctly. Packaging note: I am not packaging the oktetapart because it conflicts with the version in kdeutils (kdeutils 4.0 only contains the KPart, not the full application, which is scheduled to be merged in 4.1) and because the application doesn't actually use the KPart, only the common libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 04:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020419.m024JDD7026245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-01-01 23:19 EST ------- ping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 04:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426611] Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020459.m024xUE9027696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426611 ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-01-01 23:59 EST ------- wrt license: the README says v2, but the program itself--in the only place it says "copyright" and so forth, says v2+ (see ui.ml). There are no formal copyright headers in the actual source files. I take the latter to be the author's intent. We can ask him. wrt spec file ocaml boilerplate: removed wrt .desktop file: out of my area, never wrote one before; I tried to look at the equivalent gitk package for a model, but it doesn't have one either. Updated packages uploaded, please approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 04:59:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 23:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020459.m024xPUx027630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-01 23:59 EST ------- I've adjusted the numbering because of the changelog that originally came from upstream I have added some patches for the ownership changes. This is a quote from the README Note: you need at least one database in order to compile and run MediaTomb - either sqlite or mysql. I know in Debian you can use || for or but I'm not to sure what it is in Fedora. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-0.10.0-3.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-service.patch http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-conf-fedora.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 05:20:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 00:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020520.m025KhVf001666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 06:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 01:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020637.m026bB2a011164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 01:37 EST ------- As this package contains desktop as separate source, you can modify it to satisfy following mock build warning /var/tmp/textflow-0.2.2-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/textflow.desktop: warning: value "textflow.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 08:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020817.m028HxXN024021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-01-02 03:17 EST ------- > Is there already pkgs available in updates-testing/koji? After a review is approved it is first imported into CVS and then packages are built for rawhide and then releases. You can pick the src.rpm for now and build it yourself which will give testing feedback to the review itself. If you just want a working solution for now you can get binary builds from the above mentioned src.rpm at http://atrpms.net/dist/f8/ivtv-fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 08:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020835.m028Z6gd026200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 03:35 EST ------- 1)But, as said here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e205651a2c97a6857ab748c20d8ea60c25e3a520 its upto you to make changes or not in desktop file. So its not a blocker. 2)Also, packaging guidelines say If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as . So, good to add --vendor = "fedora" 3) I wonder howcome build.log failed to show duplicate files installed for textflow.desktop as I can see textflow.desktop installed twice in buildroot see, copying textflow.desktop -> /var/tmp/textflow-0.2.2-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications and + desktop-file-install --vendor= --dir=/var/tmp/textflow-0.2.2-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications /builddir/build/SOURCES/textflow.desktop Anyway, I will not see this as blocker then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 08:38:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020838.m028ckAM026473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 03:38 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. e3bb217f7e8ea3f8976d013442f41d99 textflow-0.2.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honoured correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files handled correctly. + no scriptlets are used. +GUI app. APPROVED. SHOULD: keep upstream tarball timestamp intact. Add fedora as vendor tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 09:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 04:11:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426929] Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020911.m029Blsf032425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tetex-lineno - Add line numbers on paragraphs in LaTeX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426929 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-02 04:11 EST ------- This is build in EL-4. Jindrich, I propose that you close that bug when you have added the Obsoletes/Provides in EL-5 and fedora texlive. Ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 09:12:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 04:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020912.m029CoLl032526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 04:12 EST ------- I might have had a few issues and the SRPM is significantly bigger because of having to download the common files to compile it which I used to build the xml -> html. I haven't had a chance to speak to stickster as of yet but if I do and can learn of a better way I'll use that or if you can point me in the right direction that would be grat. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython-5.4-3.fc8.src.rpm All the patches are located in the following directory http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 09:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 04:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020946.m029kRqg005106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-02 04:46 EST ------- kde-config isn't missing, it wasn't found. I have something wrong in BR or configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 09:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 04:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801020953.m029rOew005940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-02 04:53 EST ------- New version: * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml-2.3.10-9.fc8.src.rpm * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml.spec dist-f9 build: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=318623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 10:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 05:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021001.m02A13P4004215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 05:01 EST ------- For 0.10.0-3: * Conditional BuildRequires: - Still build.log says: ----------------------------------------------------- 327 CONFIGURATION SUMMARY ---- 328 329 sqlite3 : yes 330 mysql : yes 331 libjs : yes 332 libmagic : yes 333 inotify : yes 334 libexif : yes 335 id3lib : yes 336 taglib : disabled 337 libextractor : disabled ----------------------------------------------------- A. For taglib, configure.ac says: ----------------------------------------------------- 1659 AC_ARG_ENABLE(id3lib, 1660 AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-id3lib], [compile with taglib support (default: yes, preferred over taglib)]), 1677 AC_ARG_ENABLE(taglib, 1678 AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-taglib], [compile with taglib support (default: yes, if id3lib is not available)]), ----------------------------------------------------- So as id3lib is preferred, having taglib disabled can be ignored. B. For libextractor, configure.ac says: ----------------------------------------------------- 1982 AC_ARG_ENABLE(libextractor, 1983 AC_HELP_STRING([--enable-libextractor], [compile with libextractor support (default: no)]), ----------------------------------------------------- So it seems that explicit configure option "--enable-libextractor" is needed. * Patches - Patch0 and Patch1 are not applied?? * Macros - Please use %_sysconfdir for /etc (useradd -r -g mediatomb -d /etc/mediatomb ..... ) %_localstatedir for /var - Also, for consistency please replace with make -> %__make install -> %__install rm -> %__rm * Directory ownership - Still %_sysconfdir/mediatomb/ is not owned by this package and you removed the lines to create/chown the directory %_sysconfdir/mediatomb/ by %PATCH0. Perhaps with this "service mediatomb" won't start. Also, when removing mediatomb rpm, all files under %_sysconfdir/mediatomb are left unremoved as these files are not owned by any package To - Create %_sysconfdir/mediatomb with proper ownership - Make it sure that all files under %_sysconfdir/mediatomb/ are removed properly when removing mediatomb Please add following: ------------------------------------------------------------ %install ........ %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" # make all files under %%_sysconfdir/mediatomb are owned by # this package %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/mediatomb touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/mediatomb/{config.xml,mediatomb.db,mediatomb.html} %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d ...... %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) ...... %attr(-,mediatomb,mediatomb) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/mediatomb.conf %attr(-,mediatomb,mediatomb) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/mediatomb/ %attr(-,mediatomb,mediatomb) %ghost %{_syscondir}/mediatomb/* %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/%{name} ...... ------------------------------------------------------------ (In reply to comment #8) > Note: > > you need at least one database in order to compile and run MediaTomb - > either sqlite or mysql. > > I know in Debian you can use || for or but I'm not to sure > what it is in Fedora. - For this package it is easier to write "Requires: mysql" (as you are doing now) because mediatomb binary is already linked against both sqlite and mysql library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 11:10:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 06:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] New: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython-165-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: DrPython is a highly customizable cross-platform ide to aid programming in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 11:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 06:58:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021158.m02BwSVg020343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-01-02 06:58 EST ------- C source files would belong into the -devel package as either %doc files or in %_datadir. Where exactly to put them depends on how they are integrated with the rest of the package (e.g. m4 scripts). In your case, however, you included the source of the executables built into /usr/bin. That's strange. > /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `0' used to build cache Then you had junk (e.g. '#' comment lines) directly after a scriptlet section in your spec file and it was added as the scriptlet body. > What format should I use? %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 12:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021214.m02CEiZ6026289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 07:14 EST ------- I have uploaded the latest versions of the spec file and actually used the patches this time. I've tested it on my computer the only issue it mediatomb doesn't have access to my home directory. That is not much of an issue since if it had permission it would be a security risk. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-0.10.0-4.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-conf-fedora.patch http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-service.patch Thanks so much for your effort I appreciate it since I'm learning a lot from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 12:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:26:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] New: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Bless is a binary (hex) editor, a program that enables you to edit files as sequences of bytes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 12:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021225.m02CP6GV024700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 07:25 EST ------- Just for a bit of information I have spoken to upstream and he has read this thread and his response to the questions is below. Regarding the md5sum implementation, it comes with libupnp and we were pointed to the license issues by Debian people; we received a patch that replaces this md5sum implementation with a free one, it will be applied shortly. For Fedora it would make sense to compile a version with taglib support (because of their no mp3 policy it would make sense to take a library that is capable of parsing ogg metadata). Only mysql client libraries are needed for compilation, but mysql server is needed to run MediaTomb in mysql mode (however the mysql server can be on a remote system as well; in our binary packages we usually compile with sqlite and mysql support so people can easily switch to whatever they like best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 12:33:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021233.m02CXCKi025545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: bless - |Review Request: bless - |High quality, full featured |High quality, full featured |hex editor |hex editor Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 07:33 EST ------- will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 12:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 07:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 261801] Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021242.m02CgRTD026880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pixel - CL web image gallery generator with JavaScript viewer Alias: px-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=261801 ------- Additional Comments From jkubin at redhat.com 2008-01-02 07:42 EST ------- Now I'm extremely busy, I have hardly time to sleep ... Be patient please, as soon as I find a free weekend I'll fix remaining bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 13:24:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426646] Review Request: perl-XML-Merge - Flexibly merge XML documents In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021324.m02DO1Lh001569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Merge - Flexibly merge XML documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426646 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-02 08:24 EST ------- Thx Kevin. Imported and built in devel. Imported and tagged in F-8, but build failed because perl-XML-Tidy is not available yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 13:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 08:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427096] Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021339.m02DdsS0006213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtkimageview - Simple image viewer widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427096 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2008-01-02 08:39 EST ------- gtkimageview-1.5.0-1 built for Rawhide, F-8, F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 15:19:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021519.m02FJquO020460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 10:19 EST ------- Milan, would you read or comment on the following thread? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-January/msg00002.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 15:33:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:33:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021533.m02FXMie025076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-02 10:33 EST ------- Happy New Year Axel! (In reply to comment #19) > This addresses the following comment further up: > > What is wrong in this package are directory ownership, > > This must be fixed... (even if this is a minor thing) I think you miss me, your package cannot own directories that are targeted to the filesystem, that's why I think it is better to remove them. That way, the package will be good for the next half decade (as i expect). That been said, keeping compat location are fine for RHEL4 and RHEL5, (if this make sense to have them, but i don't think so as your repository have 0.10.6 for RHEL5 and 2.6.18 kernels)... But for the currently supported Fedora version (since Fedora 7 and Rawhide), I don't see any reason for keeping them... since we use kernel 2.6.22 and later... About preventing timestamps, you are right so this is fine as it is... What remain are: - compat location problem. - no Doc are provided (this is mandatory to have them when they are provided within the package: license-oemihvisv.txt and license-end-user.txt - so probably both are needed). All others points raised in this review are acceptable... So to avoid conflict with the compat location problem I will try to ask advices from others reviewers as: - I don't see any reason to keep them as this will be useful only for older version of the ivtv kernel module that I expect not to build against current Fedora kernels. - Fedora version that still use hotplug can have an older ivtv-firmware version (as such I can agree to have a build conditional to provide them with older Fedora version but not with the currently supported Fedora - Or to have different specs in cvs branches for RHEL4/5 and Fedora) - No userland application (in Fedora or elsewhere) really needs theses compat location in currently maintained Fedora versions. - Theses compat locations produce ownership directory problems , as such deprecated location must be cleaned from the package. If you disagree with some of theses points, please explain why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 15:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] New: Package review: tcl-html Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 Summary: Package review: tcl-html Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Please review separated hmtl manual package for tcl. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/tcl-html/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021600.m02G01AH029003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-01-02 11:00 EST ------- It seems Mediatomb uses it's own private copy of libupnp and is not the last one. libupnp is already part of fedora (1.6.2 in stable and 1.6.3 pending) so please patch Mediatomb to use the libupnp provides by fedora. If you have contact upstream i will be please to know why they use a private copy of libupnp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:10:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:10:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021610.m02GANKB031403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From jin at deadlock.dhs.org 2008-01-02 11:10 EST ------- I'm one of the MediaTomb devs; we use a heavily patched version of libupnp, partially bugfixes, partially feature extensions, we branched off long time ago and did quite a few changes so it's very difficult to merge with 1.6.2 or later. We plan to get rid of libupnp soon, we will replace it by our own code, work on that will start after the upcoming 0.11.0 version of MediaTomb is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021620.m02GK8kP031134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wart at kobold.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021620.m02GKPEB031212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr 2008-01-02 11:20 EST ------- Your bugfixes and feature extensions have been submitted to pupnp project which is an active one since 1.6.0 ? Do you know also libdlna (http://libdlna.geexbox.org/) which is dlna extension and is part of livna ? I'm not sure using your own code will be the best solution but it's up to you ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394941] Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021625.m02GPvwW032059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394941 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 11:25 EST ------- Closing for now as this is already in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:29:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394941] Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021629.m02GTDRJ001962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tpm-tools - TPM management utilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394941 Bug 394941 depends on bug 323441, which changed state. Bug 323441 Summary: Review Request: trousers - The open-source TCG software stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323441 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 323441] Review Request: trousers - The open-source TCG software stack In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021629.m02GTCEj001918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trousers - The open-source TCG software stack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=323441 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(yoder1 at us.ibm.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 11:29 EST ------- Closing as this is already in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021636.m02Gafex003285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From jin at deadlock.dhs.org 2008-01-02 11:36 EST ------- The changes we made to libupnp are under LGPLv2 while libupnp itself is under BSD (I checked with the FSF regarding this approach and it's OK). I asked libupnp people if they would like to move to LGPL, however the thread faded away without any results... basically meaning that our code can not be used in their tree. I am aware of libdlna, however it is my understanding that it only adds DLNA extensions, it does not replace libupnp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021636.m02GaoBk003331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-02 11:36 EST ------- >From the the build.log * Use of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS cc -I/builddir/build/BUILD/ivtv-1.0.3/utils/../driver -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -Wall -g ivtv-radio.c -o ivtv-radio This mean that our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS aren't took, there is a problem with the perl patch in %prep. Others dynamic patches in %prep that are related to the driver part could be dropped... * Missing %{?_smp_mflags} when doing make at %build step (if it do not work, you have to tell it within the spec). * Checks if Requirements are sane: Requires: /usr/bin/perl ivtv-firmware libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) perl(Getopt::Long) rtld(GNU_HASH) The above line show the requirement for the ivtv package, it has /usr/bin/perl and perl(Getopt::Long) that are bring by the /usr/share/ivtv/ivtvfwextract.pl * The README.utils state that: ---------------------------------------------------- v4l2-ctl -------- This is a copy of the same utility that is available from the linux v4l-dvb repository (www.linuxtv.org). It can be used to set, list and get almost everything that the v4l2 API offers. ivtvctl ------- Similar to v4l2-ctl, but only contains ivtv-specific features. Eventually all ivtv functionality should be moved into v4l2-ctl, and then this utility will be removed. ---------------------------------------------------- So I wonder if v4l2-ctl will conflict the v4l-dvb tools. For now I think providing v4l2-ctl with ivtv is better, but we might monitor if this package will be replaced by something from http://www.video4linux.org/browser So to sum-up: there is a need to check for $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and add %{?_smp_mflags}. @Juha Tuomala - I would say if you can test it would be fine, but I have no doubt that the package works... What is checked here is about fine tuning the package against the Fedora builsystem and guidelines. Which card do you own for information ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021643.m02Gh0vs002132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 11:42 EST ------- For 0.10.0-4: Well, now for me your spec file is okay except for - upnp_md5.{h.c} license issue - Some cosmetic issues * Well I was a bit just lazy but please put macros in braces for consistency... * And also for consistency please choose $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, not using both. Then as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 16:48:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021648.m02GmJcX004868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-01-02 11:48 EST ------- * The Provides: line is not needed, since this package doesn't actually provide any code. * download urls for sourceforge are best listed as: URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/tcl/tcl%{version}-html.tar.gz ...instead of using a hardcoded mirror. * The RPM group would be more accurate as 'Documentation' * A proper 'index.html' index page would be useful. A simple one can be created in either %prep or %build as a symlink to point to 'contents.htm' ln -s html/contents.htm html/index.html * Minor nitpick: I've been told by others that it's good to have an empty %build and %install section in the spec file instead of leaving them out. Apparently there are some rpm corner cases that will choke if they sections are missing. In these cases, I usually do this: %build # Nothing to build. %install # Nothing to install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021700.m02H0KJt005183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From tuju at iki.fi 2008-01-02 12:00 EST ------- > Which card do you own for information ? I've one Hauppage 500 dual card on CentOS5, but I'm not sure did it break once my environment temperatures got high (or did something change on centos4 back then). Thus I got another Hauppage 150 (wintv) card on f8 box which i can use for whatever testing. Box is old&slow and thus i can't compile on it but it should work as tuner just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:13:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021713.m02HDU2I008813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv - An iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 ------- Additional Comments From tuju at iki.fi 2008-01-02 12:13 EST ------- Single card: WinTV-Express, Multi-PAL, 44809 LF, REV E1A5. Combo card: PAL-B/G-I-,D/K-SECAM 23559 LF REV E491. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:20:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021720.m02HKRF3008712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225696, which changed state. Bug 225696 Summary: Merge Review: diffutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225696 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225696] Merge Review: diffutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021720.m02HKQM3008688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225696 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.8.1-20.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-01-02 12:20 EST ------- All fixed in 2.8.1-20.fc9. I've written to Paul Eggert to ask for clarification of the license for src/side.c. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021723.m02HNfJa009062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-02 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #43) > You should use this URL in the Source-Tag: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 Fixed, updates both RPMS files: (release 3) SPEC: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn.spec RPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.2-3.src.rpm * package builds in mock. * package installs properly. * rpmlint has valid complaints. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021726.m02HQhRa010999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From wilmer at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-02 12:26 EST ------- [ERRATA] Sorry, the correct links of SRPM file is: RPMS: http://mybashburn.sourceforge.net/mybashburn-1.0.2-3.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] New: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jgranado at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit.spec SRPM URL: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A tool that automates simple and common system recovery tasks. feature page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Features/FirstAidKit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021726.m02HQcmY009766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-01-02 12:26 EST ------- http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/jabbin/build.log But I used here this patch above. I don't use any tarball here, because I don't knoow how should it look like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 17:45:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:45:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417111] Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021745.m02HjpKf013795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417111 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-01-02 12:45 EST ------- - Correct install. - Correct documentation. Spec URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/youtube-dl/youtube-dl.spec SRPM URL: http://kurzawa.nonlogic.org/rpm/youtube-dl/youtube-dl-2007.10.12-5.fc8.src.rpm P.S Thanks for comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 18:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427275] New: Review Request: python-tgexpandingformwidget - A repeating form widget for TurboGears Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427275 Summary: Review Request: python-tgexpandingformwidget - A repeating form widget for TurboGears Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rcritten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-tgexpandingformwidget.spec SRPM URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-tgexpandingformwidget-0.1.3-2.fc7.src.rpm Description: TGExpandingFormWidget is a type of repeating form widget for TurboGears. It contains groups of widgets which are repeated on the page. The user is able to dynamically add or remove widget groups as required before submitting the form. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 18:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 13:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418921] Review Request: rubygem-activeresource - Active Record for web resources In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021855.m02ItXIC022750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activeresource - Active Record for web resources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418921 dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2008-01-02 13:55 EST ------- Imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 19:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225735] Merge Review: ethtool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801021923.m02JNgkb029164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ethtool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225735 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-01-02 14:23 EST ------- I [cw]ould maintain ethtool for Fedora - but I think, I can't for RHEL ;-) If somebody from Red Hat comes up for RHEL, please let me know, whether he or she wants or not wants to maintain ethtool in Fedora as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 21:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] New: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rcritten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-kerberos.spec SRPM URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-kerberos-1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: This Python package is a high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations. The goal is to avoid having to build a module that wraps the entire Kerberos.framework, and instead offer a limited set of functions that do what is needed for client/serverKerberos authentication based on . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 21:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022108.m02L8uY0014480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-02 16:08 EST ------- Yep, looks like they did updates. As to the -f parameter, I am using it. :) New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tiresias-fonts-1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/tiresias-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 21:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225696] Merge Review: diffutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022141.m02Lftco019545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225696 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-02 16:41 EST ------- Cool. Thanks for the prompt fixes... Note that for Merge reviews, you should have the reviewer approve before closing the bug. Not that it matters in this case, as everything except the one file's license is fixed. Hopefully that will get cleared up soon. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 21:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:53:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022153.m02Lrqjm019420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag| |fedora-review- ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-02 16:53 EST ------- I'm closing this bug out. Without the license clarification, we cannot ship this package as is. Feel free to reopen if the licensing problems are resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 22:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022219.m02MJvJI023722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-02 17:19 EST ------- Strictly speaking, this would normally be a problem, as those files are licensed BSD with advertising (which is GPL incompatible). However, the RSA MD5 implementation is a special case, where RSA has given everyone permission to use their implementations "without license from RSA", so that is how Fedora will use that code. You should advise upstream to read: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-January/msg00002.html Upstream should also be advised to strongly consider "using" that code without the RSA license, to avoid this sort of licensing confusion. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 22:28:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022228.m02MS7Nf025340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-02 17:28 EST ------- Yeah, if we can't distribute it, we can't distribute it in the SRPM, and we need to pull it out of the tarball. Inform upstream of this problem and see if they will release a new version of the software that doesn't have the troublesome file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 22:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022241.m02MfJwV027384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 17:41 EST ------- Updated Spec file and SRPM. The patches are there for completeness nothing has been altered from previous patches. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-0.10.0-6.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-conf-fedora.patch http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-service.patch I have several review requests main reason they have not been approved is due to upstream. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 22:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251828] Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022253.m02Mr9Ur030552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: quesa - OSS implementation of QuickDraw 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251828 ajax at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(ajax at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From ajax at redhat.com 2008-01-02 17:53 EST ------- Sorry for the delay. New stuff: Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/quesa/quesa.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/quesa/quesa-1.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Fixes all the above concerns, except for %doc ChangeLog, which appears to not have been updated in over three years now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 23:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022321.m02NLlMG002767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 ------- Additional Comments From jeckersb at redhat.com 2008-01-02 18:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > About the above rpmlint complaints: > > The issue with executable documentation is that it has dependencies. > (Non-executable documentation can have dependencies as well, as rpm will > extract dependency information from perl files and such). What you don't want > is for documentation to force a bunch of additional dependencies that the > package wouldn't need at all if it were installed without that documentation. > In this case the only dependency is the Python interpreter, so that's OK, but > if that dependency makes use of modules, then you have to watch out that future > RPM releases don't gain enough Python dependency generation logic to figure > those out. > > Another consideration is that if the script is sufficiently useful that you > expect users will want to run it, you should just package it as you would any > other executable: in /usr/bin, instead of hidden under /usr/share/doc. > > You should drop the manual dependency on python; rpm figures that out for > itself in the form of the python(abi) dependency. > > You also probably want to remove the comment in the %files section as that's > just an instruction to the packager that appears in the specfile template. > > Checklist: > * source files match upstream: > 27b69bf6f1452e8f41577646ddfe78f9528a437409927d5d543bc97d75e27a03 > PyYAML-3.05.tar.gz > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > * summary is OK. > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > * build root is OK. > * license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). > * package installs properly > * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. > X final provides and requires: > PyYAML = 3.05-1.fc9 > = > /usr/bin/python > X python >= 2.3 > python(abi) = 2.5 > > * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. > * owns the directories it creates. > * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no scriptlets present. > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > Thanks Jason, I have set the example to be non-executable, now the package is rpmlint clean. I also removed the explicit python dependency and removed the extra comment. New spec and srpm: http://csee.wvu.edu/~johnny/fedora/PyYAML.spec http://csee.wvu.edu/~johnny/fedora/PyYAML-3.05-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 23:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022330.m02NUtIW001950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-02 18:30 EST ------- I have made the changes to the .desktop file and added fedora as vendor id. The new files can be found here: Spec URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/textflow.spec SRPM URL: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/8/SRPMS/textflow-0.2.2-2.fc8.src.rpm New .desktop file: http://krakoa.dk/fedora/textflow.desktop I will proceed with the CVSAdminProcedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 23:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:40:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022340.m02NeCft005455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-02 18:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: textflow Short Description: TextFlow is a text editor directed toward programmers Owners: maxx Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 2 23:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:52:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801022352.m02Nqntr007051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-02 18:52 EST ------- Well, it builds ok in mock here and rpmlint says only: diveintopython.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/diveintopython/diveintopython.css diveintopython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) I only see the html output though... should it be generating the txt and pdf outputs as well? I can look further later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 00:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:10:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030010.m030APCY007874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 19:10 EST ------- I think it depends on the build.info which only has the html as the default type. The recommendation from stickster was to use yelp to display the xml which I'm trying to get set up and tested at the moment. My personal preference is to stick with html, pdf and txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:08:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030108.m0318ROa017802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:08 EST ------- Well, Please pull "BuildRequires: mysql-libs" back to "BuildRequires: mysql-devel" to make mediatomb binary linked againt mysql library (Note: installing mysql-devel auto installs mysql, so also mysql-libs) Other things are okay (I saw 3 your other review requests quickly) ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (mediatomb) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:09:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:09:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030109.m0319HMC017891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Strictly speaking, this would normally be a problem, as those files are licensed > BSD with advertising (which is GPL incompatible). > > However, the RSA MD5 implementation is a special case, where RSA has given > everyone permission to use their implementations "without license from RSA", so > that is how Fedora will use that code. > > You should advise upstream to read: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-January/msg00002.html > > Upstream should also be advised to strongly consider "using" that code without > the RSA license, to avoid this sort of licensing confusion. > > Lifting FE-Legal. Okay, thank you for clarifying! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030132.m031WAJS021686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 20:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, Please pull "BuildRequires: mysql-libs" back to > "BuildRequires: mysql-devel" to make mediatomb binary linked againt mysql > library > (Note: installing mysql-devel auto installs mysql, so also mysql-libs) > > Other things are okay (I saw 3 your other review requests quickly) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (mediatomb) is APPROVED by me > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Done http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-0.10.0-7.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-conf-fedora.patch http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mediatomb/mediatomb-service.patch > Please follow the procedure according to: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies > that you need a sponsor (at the stage, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship) > Then I will sponsor you. I have done that already. It's listed as unapproved. > > If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). > > If you have questions, please ask me. > > I will look into it thanks again for the help. I also do need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:41:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030141.m031fsST024430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:41 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 426733) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:42:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030142.m031gq3a022762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:42 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 426733) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030141.m031fQjU022467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:41 EST ------- Now I should be sponsoring you. Please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030142.m031gBul022666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-02 20:42 EST ------- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 426733) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 01:51:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426990] Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030151.m031pN9w026755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-02 20:51 EST ------- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 02:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 21:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030218.m032IS2T030752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 mastahnke at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-01-02 21:18 EST ------- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-libgmail-docs-0.3-3.fc9.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-libgmail-docs.spec I have made changes recommended in previous comments. This will stay its own package, as it has a separate upstream download. The py files are marked executable in the %doc directory. It looks like some other packages do this also (subversion for one). Fixed license. Changed group. Removed requires libgmail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 03:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030340.m033eRwI009968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 22:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediatomb Short Description: MediaTomb is an open source (GPL) UPnP MediaServer Owners: mwiriadi Branches: F8 F9 InitialCC: mwiriadi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 03:43:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030343.m033hNix007799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030435.m034ZRC8015020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 23:35 EST ------- Just want to know why this patch is needed bless-0.5.2-buildfix.patch ? rpmlint is not happy with messages bless.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib bless.src:66: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bless/ other rpmlint message is ok as per mono packaging guidelines. bless.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030440.m034eSVL015650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-02 23:40 EST ------- cvs done. I assume you wanted F-8 and devel branches? There isn't a F-9 branch yet, and won't be until much later in this devel cycle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030443.m034hSRs018294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 23:43 EST ------- use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:44:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030444.m034if6O018409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-02 23:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030446.m034kGAA016471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-02 23:46 EST ------- Yep thanks Kevin I'm not to sure about F-7 is there a way apart from doing the build to test whether it functions fine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:48:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030448.m034mWPp016558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-02 23:48 EST ------- Given the second paragraph from https://fedorahosted.org/firstaidkit/browser/firstaidkit, I guess the license tag should be GPLv2+ Unrelated to the spec/rpm: lots of links such as https://fedorahosted.org/firstaidkit/browser/PLUGINS https://fedorahosted.org/firstaidkit/browser/firstaidkit?format=txt https://fedorahosted.org/firstaidkit/browser/firstaidkit?format=raw give as output: Oops? Trac detected an internal error: If you think this really should work and you can reproduce it, you should consider reporting this problem to the Trac team. Go to http://trac.edgewall.org/ and create a new ticket where you describe the problem, how to reproduce it. Don't forget to include the Python traceback found below. TracGuide ? The Trac User and Administration Guide Python Traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line 406, in dispatch_request dispatcher.dispatch(req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/web/main.py", line 237, in dispatch resp = chosen_handler.process_request(req) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/browser.py", line 113, in process_request node = get_existing_node(req, repos, path, rev_or_latest) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/trac/versioncontrol/web_ui/util.py", line 98, in get_existing_node return repos.get_node(path, rev) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gitplugin/git_fs.py", line 59, in get_node return GitNode(self.git, path, rev) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/gitplugin/git_fs.py", line 131, in __init__ [(self.perm,k,self.sha,fn)]=git.tree_ls(rev, p) ValueError: need more than 0 values to unpack -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030455.m034t9ae017606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-02 23:55 EST ------- Please note that despite what the web page says, the included COPYING file (to which all source files point) as well as doc/en/license.html include the following paragraph: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. Therefore I'd say that the license tag in your spec should be GPLv2+ Ref. the desktop file: according to the packaging guidelines, the Icon tag should either use the full path to the icon or the icon name without extension (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e205651a2c97a6857ab748c20d8ea60c25e3a520) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 04:59:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 23:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030459.m034xPhi017856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-02 23:59 EST ------- source verified with upstream 7b076d700ff7b59a3881d8881db4fab7 infofont.zip fde90f52e8601a520e4e5a614604d2f2 keyfont.zip df93252d02952e8b6a4af0d45f9d7244 lpfont.zip b6bec1c6a345090dc4845bb057b25f61 pcfont.zip 9c5df5af4f04abb0a26be1b5c732c6c7 signfont.zip Followed font packaging guidelines. rpmlint is silent. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 05:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030506.m0356G07021813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 dchen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From dchen at redhat.com 2008-01-03 00:06 EST ------- It is because source codes provide better details of actual meanings of parameters. Indeed, the API info is provided in README, but it is not as clear as source code. So for me, it is very convenient to install sources as references. However, if there is rules about RPM packages, well, I can always get these sources from tar.gz. >> What format should I use? > >%post -p /sbin/ldconfig >%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 05:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030513.m035DnUU022535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-03 00:13 EST ------- The version of the GPL in the COPYING file isn't useful in determining the actual version of the GPL which applies to the source code. And if you read before the section you quoted, you'll see that's in the section "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" and is just a sample notice which is supposed to be included in the source code. It doesn't actually apply to the source code; in fact, it isn't actually part of the license at all (because it appears after the "END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS" text). If the source code really does not include any information about the version of the GPL in use, the GPL is explicit: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." Which means GPL+. But please note that I haven't actually looked at the source in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 05:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030519.m035J7TC023172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 00:19 EST ------- I can't see this package owns directory /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail-0.1.8/examples /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail-0.1.8/API I don't think its necessary to mark examples/* as executable that made rpmlint unhappy. I agree some packages installed as executable in %doc but do you have any specific reason if not mark them as non-executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 05:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:24:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030524.m035OfP9021241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 00:24 EST ------- Okay I see that you followed following suggestion >If the *.py are not going to be made executable, I think the dependency on python-libgmail is superfluous and should be dropped - without the executable bits this package is really just a bunch of docs with no dependencies. Then I think its ok for me but take care of ownership /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail-0.1.8/examples /usr/share/doc/python-libgmail-0.1.8/API please provide update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 05:59:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030559.m035xLbI025352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 00:59 EST ------- package is missing BuildRequires: krb5-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030611.m036BcnW030028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 01:11 EST ------- oops. I see that you are not member of cvsextras group. In that case you need apply and seek someone to sponsor you for cvsextras group. are you need Sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030611.m036BrLv030061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rcritten at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030609.m0369fec027120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 01:09 EST ------- when tried to build manually from tarball using python setup.py build I got errors and then I need to replace src/*.c #include to #include and build got successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427330] New: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427330 Summary: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at andrewprice.me.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://andyp.fedorapeople.org/newpkg/python-twyt.spec SRPM URL: http://andyp.fedorapeople.org/newpkg/python-twyt-0.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The twyt python module provides an interface to the remote Twitter API functions and classes to allow easy manipulation of the returned sets of data, such as status messages and user information. This package also provides an example command line Twitter client called twyt which utilises the provided modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030634.m036YPKQ030312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 01:34 EST ------- Sorry for above comment. I missed to see your name in database. You are already there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030638.m036cNqo001150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 01:38 EST ------- You need to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs. From F9, you will see egg-info files generated automatically and you need to add them in %files. This is missing in this package that's why build.log showed => error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/firstaidkit-0.1.0-py2.5.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030644.m036iC7U001956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-03 01:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > The version of the GPL in the COPYING file isn't useful in determining the > actual version of the GPL which applies to the source code. >From main.cpp: For general Sqliteman copyright and licensing information please refer to the COPYING file provided with the program. Following this notice may exist a copyright and/or license notice that predates the release of Sqliteman for which a new license (GPL+exception) is in place. So I guess that's untrue in this case or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:46:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427330] Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030646.m036kKdV032161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427330 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 01:46 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. d22a08622ea3bb4597df44a2f6593f40 twyt-0.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. + generated egg-info successfully. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 06:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 01:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030655.m036tmOc003760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-03 01:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Therefore I'd say that the license tag in your spec should be GPLv2+ Agree, fixed > Ref. the desktop file: according to the packaging guidelines, the Icon tag > should either use the full path to the icon or the icon name without extension Forgot that, fixed. Spec : http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman.spec SRPM : http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman-1.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 07:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 02:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427330] Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030700.m0370qMS004678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427330 andy at andrewprice.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2008-01-03 02:00 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-twyt Short Description: Twitter API interface for Python Owners: andyp Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 07:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 02:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 231911] Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030721.m037LWtG005067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jomolhari-fonts - Jomolhari a Bhutanese style font for Tibetan and Dzongkha https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 07:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 02:21:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218342] Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030721.m037LUpi005037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts - Tibetan Machine Uni font for Tibetan, Dzongkha and Ladakhi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218342 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 07:48:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 02:48:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030748.m037mE18011060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-03 02:48 EST ------- Well, if you don't want to maintain your package on F-7 it is okay. By the way I have only rawhide machine but I maintain my packages on devel, F-8 and F-7 :) Anyway please try to rebuild this rpm by koji on devel, F-8. For F-8, after rebuilding this rpm please also refer to Bodhi-info-DRAFT wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 08:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030824.m038Ohfj016383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 03:24 EST ------- Yep I saw that I'm planning on doing that anyways to test it. Thanks for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 08:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030831.m038VJrF014970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-03 03:31 EST ------- With %build part is rpm failing. The other commands were fine. Thank you for letting me know about it. Check the new rpm for changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 08:43:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030843.m038hrmo019254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 08:43:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030843.m038hW52019216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-03 03:43 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: sqliteman.src: E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 (can be ignored) sqliteman: no output [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1c4ac936174f0f1dbddec479657e1da0dd133d01 sqliteman-1.0.1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [x] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. The spec file tries to pack some icons using # fix icons mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps %files _datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png However the final package has: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 417 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/clear_table_contents.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5684 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/database.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3150 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/database_commit.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5990 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/database_rollback.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 572 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/delete_table_row.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 692 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/document-new.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1001 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/document-open.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1097 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/document-save-as.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1150 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/document-save.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1700 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/index.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 795 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/insert_table_row.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 568 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/key.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2533 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/runexplain.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 809 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/runsql.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27738 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/sqliteman.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2687 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/system.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 966 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/table.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2202 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/trigger.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 989 Jan 3 10:09 /usr/share/sqliteman/icons/view.png In addition to that, - it would be nice if timestamps of all those icon files would be preserved - I think you should include sqliteman/icons/AUTHORS. 2. According to sqliteman/icons/AUTHORS, the icons are released under the LGPL license. Which, if I understand correctly the guidelines from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-5dcaa7704b32aabaddc2e709f328f48eea6c91de make me think that you have to - either use as tag "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" or - separate the icons in another standalone package and use different license tags for the main and the -icons package If I am wrong here, by all means please do correct me, I am fairly new in the licensing field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:28:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030928.m039S5hP024531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 04:28 EST ------- This spec file should be brought up to date, there are many easy items, it would be nice to do this before the review not to waste anyone time. But I have a concern about circular Build dependencies. Indeed, it seems to me that there is a cirular build loop texinfo -> ncurses-devel -> gpm-devel -> gpm -> install-info in texinfo. One way to avoid this loop would be to have a gpm-lib package. This only makes sense if the library are really independent from the executables. It may be, for example, that the library only works if the server is started. Another way could be to have a subpackage for the info files. Or don't care about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:31:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] New: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday.spec.txt SRPM URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday-2.4-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates. Quite useful in timing situations where you need elapsed time between dates. Also useful for astronomy applications. I want to include this in the astronomy spin of fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030933.m039XvBx025233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030952.m039qD4m030685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 04:52 EST ------- 5) Don't include .a and .la files in %files. Fedora packaging guidelines suggests http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 6) usage of make should be as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e 7) This package does not honor compiler flags look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030947.m039lpoe030084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 04:47 EST ------- You need some SPEC cleanups and follow packaging guidelines as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines 1) change source URL from http://jaist.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/jday/jday-2.4.tar.gz to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz check more on it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 2) SHOULD follow macros. READ more on it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e205651a2c97a6857ab748c20d8ea60c25e3a520/mono 3) ldconfig usage should be as per given http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-d0dbcb7eec27622a21df280009c5b089b02f5bef 4) you need to add -devel subpackage which includes header files and .so files provide updated package links, updating release tag and adding correct changelog of what change you did in SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 10:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031001.m03A1TZN032253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 05:01 EST ------- On http://invisible-island.net/ncurses/ncurses.faq.html#using_gpm_lib there is With ncurses 5.5, the recommendation is still the same: build the GPM library without the Gpm_Wgetch interface. ncurses 5.5 can dynamically load the GPM library on Linux, and that eliminates any reason to have the ncurses library built with an explicit dependency upon GPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 09:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 04:58:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226188] Merge Review: ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801030958.m039wqE6031461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 04:58 EST ------- I am looking at the gpm and ncurse cross dependencies, and it looks like something needs a bit of explanation. I don't understand exactly what is happening, but it looks like there are cross-dependencies in the 2 libraries. The issue is mitigated by some workarounds, but overall it looks quite wrong to me. It looks like ncurses dlopens gpm looking at the soname found at build time... which is not right. Moreover this leads to a loop build dependency between the 2 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 10:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031000.m03A0L7P028895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 05:00 EST ------- Also there is a strange cross dependency on ncurses, see Bug 226188#13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 10:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225753] Merge Review: findutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031010.m03AAJMT030710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: findutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225753 ------- Additional Comments From vcrhonek at redhat.com 2008-01-03 05:10 EST ------- Hi, thanks for your review. I fixed all issues in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 10:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 05:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031025.m03APvvN032590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-03 05:25 EST ------- Package now includes eggs. The links are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:03:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225696] Merge Review: diffutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031103.m03B3Ci8008206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: diffutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225696 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-01-03 06:03 EST ------- Thanks. Paul Eggart has replied to confirm that the "GNU General Public License version 2 or (at your option) later" is in fact what is intended in that file, and that it is fixed in upstream CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:07:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:07:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031107.m03B7vIF005674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-03 06:07 EST ------- I have made the required changed to the spec please review the new spec at: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday.spec.txt and SRPM at: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday-2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031129.m03BT297011470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-03 06:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Just want to know why this patch is needed bless-0.5.2-buildfix.patch ? Because the data in the po directory breaks the build and there aren't any translations included anyway (in the tarball). > rpmlint is not happy with messages > bless.src:41: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib > bless.src:66: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bless/ I know but I had to do this because using libdir would result in either /usr/lib64/ or /usr/lib/ depending on the build host. And since this is a noarch package it has to use /usr/lib. > other rpmlint message is ok as per mono packaging guidelines. > bless.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:31:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031131.m03BVXDP008775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-03 06:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Fixed: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:36:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031136.m03BakTN012590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-03 06:36 EST ------- CVS Change Request =================== Package name : mono Initial Owner : Alexll at redhat.com New Branch : EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 11:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031141.m03Bf57i010063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-03 06:41 EST ------- "We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch." So I changed it to not be noarch. http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 12:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 408941] Review Request: Unicornscan - Scalable, Accurate, Flexible, and Efficient Network Probing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031229.m03CTg8J016508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Unicornscan - Scalable, Accurate, Flexible, and Efficient Network Probing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408941 ------- Additional Comments From robert at outpost24.com 2008-01-03 07:29 EST ------- We are currently searching for an x86_64 fedora box to do development on. If you know of such a machine that we may use to solve the compilation issue, it would be much appreciated. We are tracking down all of the other items you've listed. We are now using your modified spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 12:45:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 07:45:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 408941] Review Request: Unicornscan - Scalable, Accurate, Flexible, and Efficient Network Probing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031245.m03Cjqok021604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Unicornscan - Scalable, Accurate, Flexible, and Efficient Network Probing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=408941 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-03 07:45 EST ------- you can use koji scratch build for that. or, if this helps, send me the src.rpm and I can run it in mock and then send you the logs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 13:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031319.m03DJnEI023862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 mschmidt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-01-03 08:19 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jabbim New Branches: F-7 I have installed Fedora 7 in Xen and verified Jabbim works there too. I'd like to make Jabbim available in F-7 when version 0.3 is released in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 13:31:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 08:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226188] Merge Review: ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031331.m03DVUUB028118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-03 08:31 EST ------- Hm, ncurses don't require gpm, libgpm will be used only when installed. What exactly is wrong with dlopening libgpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031405.m03E5Bde000577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 09:05 EST ------- 1.) 38 # add shebang and remove .py file 39 ( 40 echo '#!/usr/bin/env python' 41 cat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/runxlrd.py 42 ) >> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/runxlrd 43 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin/runxlrd.py* \ Please replace "/usr/bin" with %{_bindir} (and eventually with "/usr/bin/env python" with %{__python} in case you consider %{__python} macro to be acceptably usable in specs -- ans you seem to do) 2.) 58 %attr(755,root,root) /usr/bin/* Likewise 3.) The package should contain the text of the license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:08:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:08:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031408.m03E8GPj000911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rcritten at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2008-01-03 09:08 EST ------- Added krb5-devel to BuildRequires, thanks. Spec URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-kerberos.spec SRPM URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-kerberos-1.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Per comment #2 there is a patch included in the src.rpm to fix that: PyKerberos-includes.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031409.m03E9cA8030714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 09:09 EST ------- I have just received an email from upstream who will send me a patch which will fix x86_64 I'm inquiring further about ppc. If the package is fixed for x86_64 do I need to resubmit it for review? Do I just change the spec file and resubmit it to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031425.m03EPKD9004069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-03 09:25 EST ------- New SPEC file uploaded. %changelog * Thu Jan 3 2008 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.6.1-5 - updated /usr/bin/env by bindir macro License is contained in licences.py and mentioned in README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:44:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031444.m03EiIUx003010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 09:44 EST ------- I've got a problem at the moment. In order to build the pdf, html and txt documents I need to go into the build.info and change the default build to pdf, txt or info. %version; ]> &buildcommon; Should I make separate packages completely or can I separate the package out and apply separate packages to patch the pdf, txt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:53:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:53:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031453.m03ErvBn004323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 09:53 EST ------- The choices are htmlflat, html and pdf I have tried doc, txt both of those fail as a build option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031451.m03EpmUL004237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-03 09:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #28) > I have just received an email from upstream who will send me a patch which will > fix x86_64 I'm inquiring further about ppc. > > If the package is fixed for x86_64 do I need to resubmit it for review? Do I > just change the spec file and resubmit it to CVS? You can fix your srpm on koji. Resubmit is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 14:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226188] Merge Review: ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031457.m03EvEDM008108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 09:57 EST ------- It seems to me that it is better to link against other libraries, not dlopen them. Otherwise the applications behaviour will be unreproductible, and without gpm installed functionalities will be missing. Also a gpm soname bump may be missed, with an optional dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 15:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:26:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031526.m03FQ65O012785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 lkundrak at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 10:26 EST ------- Thanks for the package. I believe all outstanding issues to be addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 15:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:51:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] New: Review Request: dbxml - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 Summary: Review Request: dbxml - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mzazrivec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml-perl/dbxml-perl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml-perl/dbxml-perl-2.003-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: Oracle Berkeley DB XML is an open source, embeddable XML database with XQuery-based access to documents stored in containers and indexed based on their content. Oracle Berkeley DB XML is built on top of Oracle Berkeley DB and inherits its rich features and attributes. Like Oracle Berkeley DB, it runs in process with the application with no need for human administration. Oracle Berkeley DB XML adds a document parser, XML indexer and XQuery engine on top of Oracle Berkeley DB to enable the fastest, most efficient retrieval of data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 15:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031553.m03Fr8Tv017189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427373 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 15:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031553.m03Fr8Wl017169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-03 10:53 EST ------- This review request resulted from discussions going on in bz #250093, more specifically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093#c15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 15:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:59:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351711] Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031559.m03FxuhM018354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-03 10:59 EST ------- Built for EL-4 and EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:02:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031602.m03G2KQ8019268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:02 EST ------- I decided to remove perl bindings from the package and make it a new package: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 New spec file and srpm: * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml.spec * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml-2.3.10-9.fc8.src.rpm Koji builds: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=322074 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=322092 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=322091 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031600.m03G0x3L015399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rnorwood at redhat.com |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:00 EST ------- Built for EL-4 and EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:05:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031605.m03G5rsZ020327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:05 EST ------- Builds fine for EL-5/i386 and F-8/x86_64 I rolled a new revision (sunbird-0.7-7) that includes the changes I proposed in comment #23 and comment #22. New and changed SPEC and SOURCES are available here: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/patches/sunbird/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031609.m03G9I1L016823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:09 EST ------- RPMlint: sunbird.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/sunbird.png /usr/lib/sunbird-0.7/icons/mozicon128.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:12:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031612.m03GC87B017513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-03 11:12 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-xlrd Short Description: Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files Owners: ondrejj,jafo Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:20:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031620.m03GKnaJ018976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 11:20 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:21:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226283] Merge Review: perl-URI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031621.m03GL8XW019112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-URI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226283 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226188] Merge Review: ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031630.m03GUe3M020716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:30 EST ------- Well, I think the advantages of dlopening the library outweigh the disadvantages. Most of the users probably don't use gpm in ncurses applications at all, ncurses is a pretty low-level library where I think keeping minimal dependencies is preferred (libgpm would need to be split from gpm package first to avoid circular dependency). Also, the libgpm soname is not likely to change anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:36:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031636.m03GaaG3024954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 11:36 EST ------- There is a all choice which I have patched so it will make all three. I'm currently finalizing the spec file and a new version will be uploaded tomorrow my time. This should have the resulting 3 packages from the source files listed in the spec file currently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031638.m03GcJMC025159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove Alias: perl-XML-Grove https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rnorwood at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:38 EST ------- Sorry for the lack of updates. I haven't figured out why the test is failing yet. It looks like a unicode encoding issue. I'll try to take a look at it soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031637.m03GbxXf025118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:37 EST ------- The language packs don't work for me (It might be as well an upstream issue): 1.) There's no GUI way to configure the language 2.) I can force the language by changing "general.useragent.locale" to the locale name 3.) because of 1.) sunbird should use the system's locale. I believe this is done by setting "intl.locale.matchOS" to true. It doesn't work either. I believe 3.) should be done the way firefox does it -- by supplying the default prefs file: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/rpms/firefox/F-8/firefox-redhat-default-prefs.js Possibly other preferences are interesting (the Vendor string would apply when loading calendars from http/WebDAV). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 16:40:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031640.m03GeoNA022269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-03 11:40 EST ------- Also i see wearnings like this in the error console ("chrome://navigator-region/locale/region.properties" is the default value of "general.useragent.contentlocale"): No chrome package registered for chrome://navigator-region/locale/region.properties . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] New: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/efibootmgr/efibootmgr.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/efibootmgr/efibootmgr-0.5.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: efibootmgr displays and allows the user to edit the Intel Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) Boot Manager variables. Additional information about EFI can be found at http://developer.intel.com/technology/efi/efi.htm and http://uefi.org/. efibootmgr has previously been included in the elilo SRPM, but is being split out into its own package because elilo itself will be going away once grub has that functionality. efibootmgr is ExclusiveArch i386, x86_64, and ia64 because the EFI environment only exists on those architectures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031720.m03HKP44032249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danms at us.ibm.com ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-03 12:20 EST ------- >From rpmlint on the base package: sagator.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/policytest sagator.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/pack/rtest.zip sagator.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/bigtest Putting these scripts in %{_datadir}%{name} instead of %doc will quiet a lot of these complaints. Perhaps an %{datadir}/%{name}/examples/ (or util) directory would be appropriate? sagator.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/sagator/etc/sgconf.py /etc/sagator.conf Why does the version in share link to the version in etc? If it's an example, it should be duplicated in %doc and /etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427391] New: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427391 Summary: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/cl-asdf.spec SRPM URL: cl-asdf-20071110-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Another System Definition Facility (asdf) is a package format for Common Lisp libraries. This package is a prerequisite for this feature proposal: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/CommonLispController -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:28:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031728.m03HSx1n001264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-03 12:28 EST ------- One other thing: your %install should rm -Rf %{buildroot}, per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines (Prepping BuildRoot for %install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031731.m03HVRL4001976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dbxml - Perl|Review Request: dbxml-perl - |bindings for Oracle DB XML |Perl bindings for Oracle DB | |XML -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426915] Review Request: msynctool - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031731.m03HVJnn001928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msynctool - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426915 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-03 12:31 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031734.m03HYwil002404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail.ru 2008-01-03 12:34 EST ------- [2|zap at zap|~]nogravity /usr/bin/nogravity: line 3: [: too many arguments [2|zap at zap|~]glxinfo | grep "direct rendering: " direct rendering: Yes direct rendering: Yes I think something like a 'head -1' would help :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418681] Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031742.m03Hgkx7001243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gem2rpm - Generate rpm specfiles from gems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418681 ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2008-01-03 12:42 EST ------- Thanks for the review. I addressed all your points above: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/spec/rubygem-gem2rpm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/rubygem-gem2rpm-0.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 17:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031741.m03HfGRZ000968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-03 12:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > [2|zap at zap|~]nogravity > /usr/bin/nogravity: line 3: [: too many arguments > > [2|zap at zap|~]glxinfo | grep "direct rendering: " > direct rendering: Yes > direct rendering: Yes > > I think something like a 'head -1' would help :) Thats very strange the same shell code is in opengl-games-utils and thus is quite widely used, why on earth would the output of your glxinfo say that twice, can you attach the full output? Dual head using 2 cards perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427391] Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031802.m03I2TZN007137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427391 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427411 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031802.m03I2RZx007100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427391 Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427411] New: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 Summary: Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: green at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/common-lisp-controller.spec SRPM URL: http://spindazzle.org/Fedora/common-lisp-controller-6.12-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package helps installing Common Lisp sources and compilers. It creates a user-specific cache of compiled objects. When a library or an implementation is upgraded, all compiled objects in the cache are flushed. It also provides tools to recompile all libraries and to generate Fedora packages from asdf-install packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427391] Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031802.m03I2u6j007819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cl-asdf - Another System Definition Facility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427391 green at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031818.m03IIxI4012106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 13:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > On http://invisible-island.net/ncurses/ncurses.faq.html#using_gpm_lib > there is > > With ncurses 5.5, the recommendation is still the same: build the GPM library > without the Gpm_Wgetch interface. ncurses 5.5 can dynamically load the GPM > library on Linux, and that eliminates any reason to have the ncurses library > built with an explicit dependency upon GPM. This seems wrong, however since at least libaa and w3m need the Gpm_Wgetch symbol... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031828.m03ISHIP013615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |danms at us.ibm.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-03 13:28 EST ------- Your spec should require guile and loudmouth, and probably libidn, glib, readline, ncurses, and libstdc++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:55:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225856] Merge Review: gpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031855.m03ItbHA016598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225856 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 13:55 EST ------- After thinking and looking abit more at it, I don't have an idea on how the Build cross dependency could be avoided since gpm needs the ncurses headers, and ncurses needs the gpm headers (and libs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 18:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226188] Merge Review: ncurses In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031853.m03IroMm016077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226188 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-03 13:53 EST ------- gpm is also low level, and I don't think that adding gpm runtime dependency will lead to additional runtime dependencies. Also there shouldn't be any circular dependency since (unless I am missing something) the ncurses symbols are declared weak in gpm, and therefore gpm doesn't depend on ncurses. There is already a circular build dependency since gpm-devel BuildRequires ncurses-devel and ncurses BuildRequires gpm-devel. I don't have any idea how this could be avoided, though. Indeed gpm requires the ncurses headers, and ncurses also requires gpm headers (and libs currently to get soname, though in my opinion it should be linked against gpm...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 19:23:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:23:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031923.m03JN1iN021267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-03 14:23 EST ------- I believe that all your concerns have been addressed in the latest release. SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/libvpd-1.5.0-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 19:25:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307901] Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031925.m03JPpaL023398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lsvpd - A utility to list device Vital Product Data (VPD) information. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307901 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-03 14:25 EST ------- Here is the latest release of lsvpd: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/lsvpd.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/lsvpd-1.5.0-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 19:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031934.m03JYgP4023108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 19:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 293801] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031934.m03JYKO6023063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-avivo - Xorg driver for ATI R500+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293801 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 19:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801031951.m03Jp523026538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-03 14:51 EST ------- > 1. The spec file tries to pack some icons using > # fix icons > mv %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps > %files > %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png My bad here, the comment should be: # fix the desktop icon the mv command is moving just moving /usr/share/icons/sqliteman.png to /usr/share/pixmaps/sqliteman.png so that the menu system can find the icon. Rest of the icons are for the app itself and should not be moved. However I can add a the following: # The entire source code is GPLv2+ except icons which are LGPLv2+ License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 20:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032003.m03K37FD028657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-03 15:03 EST ------- Updated pkg: - fix license again - improve comment about movement of desktop icon spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/sqliteman/sqliteman-1.0.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 20:08:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426990] Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032008.m03K81dX029448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-03 15:08 EST ------- > APPROVED Thanks, Jason! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mytop Short Description: A top clone for MySQL Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 20:10:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226499] Merge Review: tomcat5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032010.m03KAo2h030194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tomcat5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226499 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rafaels at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |patrickm at redhat.com Component|Package Review |distribution Product|Fedora |Red Hat Web Application | |Stack QAContact|fedora-package- |ldimaggi at redhat.com |review at redhat.com | Version|rawhide |v1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 20:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032023.m03KNJxN032006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-03 15:23 EST ------- Thank you for review. (In reply to comment #1) > sagator.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/policytest > sagator.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/pack/rtest.zip > sagator.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/sagator-1.0.0/test/bigtest > > Putting these scripts in %{_datadir}%{name} instead of %doc will quiet a lot of > these complaints. Perhaps an %{datadir}/%{name}/examples/ (or util) directory > would be appropriate? These files are used to test sagator's configuration after installation (configuration). I think an user does not find them in %{datadir}/%{name}/examples/ and therefore they are not useful. I think these warnings are not fatal and can be ignored. I can move whole "test" directory from docs to /usr/share, but with reduced functionality. It is better to remove them like move them to an hidden place. > sagator.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/sagator/etc/sgconf.py > /etc/sagator.conf Symlink updated to relative in next release. > Why does the version in share link to the version in etc? If it's an example, > it should be duplicated in %doc and /etc. Sagator uses python script for configuration. It is an modular system, which defines more scanners with many parameters in an array. To use this file in sagator, it need to be imported into python. That symlink adds sagator's configuration file to it's project, to be easy to include it. (In reply to comment #2) > One other thing: your %install should rm -Rf %{buildroot}, per > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines (Prepping BuildRoot for %install) Thank you, fixed. Last changelog: * Thu Jan 3 2008 Jan ONDREJ (SAL) - 1.0.0-0beta32 - clean buildroot before install - sagator.conf symlink is now relative http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/sagator.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/sagator/fedora/testing/8/SRPMS/sagator-1.0.0-0beta32.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 20:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:39:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032039.m03KduIf001993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 dwalsh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2008-01-03 15:39 EST ------- Fixes are in libselinux-2.0.46-3 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 21:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:08:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032108.m03L8e0J006455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |maxx at krakoa.dk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 21:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427170] Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032111.m03LBw7K008452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: textflow - Programmers text editor written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427170 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-03 16:11 EST ------- closing bug since the build is on its way through the system. Should appear soon in both rawhide and F8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 21:13:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032113.m03LDClN008516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-03 16:13 EST ------- builds cleanly in mock (fedora-8-i386) rpmlint output: drpython.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/drpython-165/History.txt drpython.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/drpython-165/Changelog.txt drpython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 11) The utf-8 issues need not be fixed - but please fix the mixed spaces and tabs in the .spec file. The Icon entry in the .desktop should be without the file extension (ie. drpython instead of drpython.png). It might be nice to include a small shell script called drpython which could be installed in /usr/bin to start drpython. The icon drpython.png must be installed to /usr/share/pixmaps to be found by the .desktop file. So all in all it looks quite good. The issues that must be fixed are: 1) the mixed use of tabs and spaces in the .spec file 2) the icon must be installed so that it shows up in the menus And of course it would be nice if some of the other minor issues could be fixed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 22:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] New: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt at rudeserver.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudecgi.spec SRPM URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudecgi-5.0.0-1.src.rpm Description: Library (C++ API) that allows CGI applications to access form data submitted to a webserver using GET and POST methods. It also extracts path info and cookie data from the environment and supports file uploads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:13:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032313.m03NDMI2025052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-03 18:13 EST ------- Fixed the bad bits and removed the export language bit (it was from another spec file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032323.m03NNVIX027906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-03 18:23 EST ------- #6 thanks! I've uploaded a newer version tonight which addresses much of #1's concerns Timon : thanks for the initial review. Mono packages can be an utter swine to get right as they are somewhat insane! The errors thrown up aren't actually errors in this case, which tends to throw some. As David said, keep it up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] New: Review Request: mono-zeroconf Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mono.Zeroconf is a cross platform Zero Configuration Networking library for Mono and .NET. It provides a unified API for performing the most common zeroconf operations on a variety of platforms and subsystems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:38:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032338.m03NcHd1030471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-03 18:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I should have clarified I'm still waiting for feedback from gnome so I have left > the files as is. I won't put the same docs in the same section when I have the > different docs. > > While the license tag is incorrect I can't change it till gnome gets back to me. > The package I have listed is just waiting for there alterations. Ping? Is it possible make updates to this package now? I'd like to finish up the review so you can get this into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032350.m03No5Xr030354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 18:50 EST ------- I have pinged upstream 2-3 times with the same bug listed above. They have advised be that they will be fixing it however since the first bug request they have not fixed it. So I'm not to sure what else I can do to request upstream to include the licensing information since they are not being to helpful at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040002.m04024uU032350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-03 19:02 EST ------- This seems sane to me.. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 3 23:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801032357.m03Nvkct031504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-03 18:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > So I'm not to sure what else I can do to request upstream to include the > licensing information since they are not being to helpful at the moment. Perhaps just package the theme(s) that do have licenses for the moment (and strip out the packages that don't from the tarball) and you can add them back as upstream confirms licenses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040010.m040Abiv001234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh at redhat.com 2008-01-03 19:10 EST ------- Why does RMagick link to the static library? the above config is to see the static library file name. I don't see the strong reason if it's linking the static library. -- or does it fall back to the shared library if the above config is gone? anyway, the priority should be changed to look for the shared library first, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040008.m0408qPd000739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 19:08 EST ------- All fixed hopefully. I've cleaned up the spec file compared to the previous one using a for loop. I have renamed the patch as well mainly for clarity on my sake for my sources directory. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython-165-2.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython-setup.py.postinst.patch http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython.desktop http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040015.m040Fhe9001911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-03 19:15 EST ------- Excellent. Once you post that, I will do a full review... Depending on the sizes you could subpackage those 3, or just have one package with all 3 formats available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:13:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040013.m040D7S6001395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-03 19:13 EST ------- Excellent give this a proper review tomorrow but: License tag is wrong, GPL/LGPL are not longer valid contains mono-basic patch which needs to go away. Aside it looks rather harmless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040019.m040JtBY003671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-03 19:19 EST ------- Only COPYING files I can find is Gion and Neu so is it ok to remove it after building or do I need to strip it out of the source? If I have to strip it out of Source that would mean I would possibly need to patch the configure script? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040032.m040WSh7003800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-03 19:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Fixes are in libselinux-2.0.46-3 > > Thanks. OK, the rpmlint output is now: "libselinux-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation" which is fine! The only remaining issue is the python site-packages path. Once fixed I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 00:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 19:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226044] Merge Review: libsepol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040042.m040gxU8005099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsepol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226044 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-03 19:42 EST ------- rpmlint output: "libsepol.x86_64: W: no-documentation" looks good ! ------------------ Comments on the spec file: > Provides: libsepol.so Why is this needed? ------------------ >%build >make clean >make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" Please append %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------ >%files devel >%defattr(-,root,root) >%{_libdir}/libsepol.a Either remove this file or create a -static package if it needs to be shipped for some reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 02:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226381] Merge Review: ruby In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040223.m042NYJg020314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226381 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-03 21:23 EST ------- Well, it was not 'have_header' but 'have_library'. The actual example is: When I write TEMP.rb as: -------------------------------------------------------------- require 'mkmf' have_library('z') --------------------------------------------------------------- and try "ruby TEMP.rb", it returns --------------------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C ruby TEMP.rb checking for main() in -lz... no $ cat mkmf.log have_library: checking for main() in -lz... -------------------- no "gcc -o conftest -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -fPIC conftest.c -L"." -L"/usr/lib" -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -lruby-static -lz -lpthread -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc" /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lruby-static collect2: ld returned 1 exit status checked program was: /* begin */ 1: /*top*/ 2: int main() { return 0; } 3: int t() { void ((*volatile p)()); p = (void ((*)()))main; return 0; } /* end */ "gcc -o conftest -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-linux -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -Wall -fPIC conftest.c -L"." -L"/usr/lib" -L. -rdynamic -Wl,-export-dynamic -lruby-static -lz -lpthread -ldl -lcrypt -lm -lc" /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lruby-static collect2: ld returned 1 exit status checked program was: /* begin */ 1: /*top*/ 2: int main() { return 0; } 3: int t() { main(); return 0; } /* end */ -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- I guess some fix is needed on ruby rpm side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-ParseLex.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-ParseLex-2.15-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: Perl lexical analyzer. Required for new documentation-devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParesLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040341.m043fr8X029756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParesLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |analyzer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.10-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Perl arser that builds XML trees. Used for ne documentation-devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:42:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040342.m043gQ2D031582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 jfearn at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |that builds XML trees -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:43:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:43:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] New: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-0.26-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Tool chain to convert DocBook XML in to multiple output formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427483] New: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-JBoss.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-JBoss-0.4-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: JBoss branded theme for docuemntation-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] New: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-Fedora.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-Fedora-0.4-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: Fedora branded theme for docuemntation-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 03:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:47:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427484] New: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfearn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-RedHat.spec SRPM URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devel-RedHat-0.4-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: Red Hat branded theme for docuemntation-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:17:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040417.m044HbL0003102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-03 23:17 EST ------- Alexl: could we get an ack that you want to maintain this in EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040420.m044KSBT005162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-03 23:20 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426990] Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040422.m044MvYZ003819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-03 23:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427330] Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040425.m044PB0x004274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427330 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-03 23:25 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason for not allowing cvsextras commits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040430.m044Ut7v004999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-03 23:30 EST ------- I would have loved to see the timestamps preserved, too All issues that I have pointed were fixed, the program worked OK on my desktop so the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040434.m044YJ2N006569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 23:34 EST ------- missing BR: python-setuptools-devel see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#head-3e899702195642d7d12483e0d73451b70e8d3e9c koji build failed with log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=323739&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040435.m044ZLl1005653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 23:35 EST ------- provide new updated spec and SRPM links by increasing release tag and adding changelog in spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427483] Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040438.m044cngY007240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427484] Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040439.m044d0B8007290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040438.m044coKi007264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427483 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040439.m044d1WF007315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427484 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040437.m044bW5L005756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-03 23:37 EST ------- Some initial comments: You can use %{_datadir} instead of %{_usr}/share. I don't think "BuildRequires: documentation-devel" is necessary. Personally I would prefer lowercase for the branch suffix: ie documentation-devel-fedora. That way it would be easier to find with globbing etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:43:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040443.m044hXFX007947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 23:43 EST ------- I think you also need to add ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ppc ia64 armv4l sparc alpha as BR's of this package includes them. Build failed on koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=323749&name=root.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040446.m044kjOB008512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-03 23:46 EST ------- err, brand suffix, not branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040450.m044oZ0k007429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-03 23:50 EST ------- 1) You need to follow Source URL (macro using) as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) Don't use like this %_bindir/dbd use clean and not confusing and accepted way of writing in spec %{_bindir}/dbd 3)Also, I see your spec file ends with .txt in SPEC url you provides. any reason? SPEC file should end with .spec only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040451.m044p0AK009015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-03 23:50 EST ------- BuildRequires: documentation-devel: po2entity from documentation-devel is used to create translated entity files at build time, so this BuildRequires is correct. Cheers, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040455.m044tjEj008035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-03 23:55 EST ------- No vendor or packager fields needed: please remove. Is there a web page for the package that could go in the url field? Maybe something like http://search.cpan.org/dist/ParseLex? It would be nice to use caps for the rpm fields: eg "Name", "Version", etc. %NVR is unused. make test should be move to a %check section and then %maketest would not be needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040459.m044xTCO008172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427479, 427480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040459.m044xU4F008220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427481 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 04:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040459.m044xTai008196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427481 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040513.m045DZ1g012039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 00:13 EST ------- Cool; looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040523.m045NGuN013178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 00:23 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. ==> License should be GPLv2+ or Artistic + source files match upstream. b038cdb0a419eec3569c15743c1cfd0f geoqo-0.96.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=247, 4 wallclock secs ( 1.79 cusr + 0.37 csys = 2.16 CPU) + Package geoqo-0.96-4.fc9 -> Provides: perl(GeoDB) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::AutoGUI::Values) perl(GeoDB::AutoGUI::Values::Distinct) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::AutoGUI::Values::Sets) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::DB) perl(GeoDB::Display) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Count) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Dump) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Firefox) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Graph) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Graph::Find) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Graph::Placed) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin::Attributes) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin::Rate) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin::Show) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin::Solve) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin::Tag) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::Show) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Help) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::List) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Sets) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Show) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Stats) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Display::Top10) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Everywhere::Mem) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export::Density) perl(GeoDB::Export::Gpx) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export::Html) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export::Kml) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export::Loc) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Export::System) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import) perl(GeoDB::Import::Average) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Create) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Gpx) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Loc) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Project) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::System) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Wigle) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Import::Zip) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Classify) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Delete) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Diff) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Distance) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Drop) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Dropexisting) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Gctodiff) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Limit) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Load) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Makepuzzle) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Only) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Rate) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Rewrite) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Setattr) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Solved) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Sortby) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Symbol) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Tag) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Track) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Modify::Translate) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search) perl(GeoDB::Search::Any) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Attr) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Cache) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Geodining) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Ident) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Log) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Rating) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Set) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Tag) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Track) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Waymark) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Waypoint) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Search::Wigle) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Set) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Utils) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Waypoint) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Geocache) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Geodining) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Waymark) = 0.96 perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Wigle) = 0.96 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Chart::Lines) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(DBI) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Date::Parse) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(GD) perl(GeoDB) perl(GeoDB::AutoGUI::Values) perl(GeoDB::DB) perl(GeoDB::Display) perl(GeoDB::Display::Graph) perl(GeoDB::Display::Gui::List::Plugin) perl(GeoDB::Export) perl(GeoDB::Export::Density) perl(GeoDB::Import) perl(GeoDB::Import::Gpx) perl(GeoDB::Modify) perl(GeoDB::Search) perl(GeoDB::Set) perl(GeoDB::Utils) perl(GeoDB::Waypoint) perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Geocache) perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Geodining) perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Waymark) perl(GeoDB::Waypoint::Wigle) perl(Gtk2) perl(IO::File) perl(QWizard) perl(QWizard) perl(QWizard::API) perl(Text::Balanced) perl(XML::Simple) perl(strict) + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. SHOULD: Change License to GPLv2+ or Artistic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:33:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 351711] Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040533.m045Xllt014437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Inline-Files - Allows for multiple inline files in a single perl file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351711 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040533.m045XB2Y014396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 00:33 EST ------- There's no need that I can see this package to follow "Providing Eggs for non-setuptools packages" If anyone want this package to provide egg-info then file a bug once this gets in Fedora. Review: Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for RPM But not for SRPM python-kerberos.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 19) ==> its cosmetic message. You can fix that using sed. + source files match upstream. e9bc790e51187f3afa13dc2611e5d93a python-kerberos-1.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Package python-kerberos-1.0-2.fc9 -> Provides: kerberos.so Requires: python(abi) = 2.5 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226262] Merge Review: perl-Inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040534.m045Y0FC012746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Inline https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226262 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040537.m045bsGJ015077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 00:37 EST ------- Made the necessary changes as requested. The reason why i am calling the spec file as spec.txt because i am using free yahoo web hosting to upload my files and it does not accept .spec when uploading the files. Again: SPEC File: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday.spec.txt SRPM: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday-2.4-1.f8.srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040539.m045dQ8O015136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 00:39 EST ------- This looks fine to me. I guess there's no real need to separately include a copy of the license text since we have it in the wiki now. One incredibly minor issue: # to obtain some license information have a loot at ZSI/__init__.py file You probably mean "look" instead of "loot". Of course, the license change has elicited a complaint from rpmlint: python-ZSI.noarch: W: invalid-license LBNL BSD but it will take rpmlint a while to catch up. Probably needs a ticket filed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 05:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 00:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427330] Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040545.m045j7IS014380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twyt - An interface to Twitter API functions for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427330 andy at andrewprice.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andy at andrewprice.me.uk 2008-01-04 00:45 EST ------- Ah, it was a thinko, the "no" should have been a "yes". I must have been tired. Thanks anyway, Kevin. The package has successfully built, closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 06:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040642.m046gCQv021621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 01:42 EST ------- [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.10-2.fc9.src.rpm perl-XML-TreeBuilder.src:30: W: setup-not-quiet perl-XML-TreeBuilder.src:33: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS="vendor" PREFIX="%{buildroot}%{_prefix}" perl-XML-TreeBuilder.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/CPAN perl-XML-TreeBuilder.src: W: invalid-license Artistic/GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 06:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040640.m046ek6M023076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 01:40 EST ------- This what rpmlint has to say: [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint documentation-devel-0.26-1.fc9.src.rpm documentation-devel.src: W: invalid-license GPL I feel GPL+ is a better option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 06:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040651.m046pQjc024605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 01:51 EST ------- Here is what would suit this better: 1. setup -q, but i guess this should be ok. 2. %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 3. Group: I would rather choose: Development/Libraries 4. License: GPL+ or Artistic would be more appropriate. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 06:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040655.m046tJSg023583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 01:55 EST ------- Thanks for updates. Will sponsor you after I see enough reviews from you to other people's packages. and then review this officially also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 07:09:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 02:09:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040709.m0479J6Z025377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 02:09 EST ------- I am not a sponsor so i cannot review your package, i can only comment on it. [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint php-suhosin-0.9.22-1.fc8.src.rpm php-suhosin.src: W: invalid-license PHP License See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing Everything else looks ok to me, atleast in the first glance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040921.m049LWPl012294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-04 04:21 EST ------- I feel the name is a bit too generic. How about something like docbook-build-tools? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040922.m049MDZA012345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:22 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:22:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227121] Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040922.m049MPNI012371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx-2.9.3-1jpp - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227121 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:22 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307821] Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040923.m049Nx8r013329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sooperlooper - Realtime software looping sampler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307821 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:23 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040925.m049PXHc013076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:25 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425956] Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040925.m049PjER013113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:25 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040923.m049Ndd8012518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:23 EST ------- Karel, as already said in another review of yours, I'm ready to sponsor you, so go ahead ask for cvsextras membership in the account system and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040925.m049PrfR013152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 04:25 EST ------- Are you are first time contributor? In that case i cannot sponsor you, but only comment. Your spec looks ok and rpmlint is happy with your srpm too. So i guess everything looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:25:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040925.m049P97h013794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anpaza at mail.ru ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-04 04:25 EST ------- Repeating my last comment, this time with Andrew in the CC so he will see it :) (In reply to comment #15) > [2|zap at zap|~]nogravity > /usr/bin/nogravity: line 3: [: too many arguments > > [2|zap at zap|~]glxinfo | grep "direct rendering: " > direct rendering: Yes > direct rendering: Yes > > I think something like a 'head -1' would help :) Thats very strange the same shell code is in opengl-games-utils and thus is quite widely used, why on earth would the output of your glxinfo say that twice, can you attach the full output? Dual head using 2 cards perhaps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 09:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801040952.m049ql31017745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2008-01-04 04:52 EST ------- Updated, http://bart.ulyssis.org/fedora/php-suhosin/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041000.m04A01vC018569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 05:00 EST ------- I can see the newer spec file there, just the new srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041008.m04A8LkB019450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be 2008-01-04 05:08 EST ------- A dirty browser cache? I can see it with two different browsers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:11:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041011.m04AB9p2020057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-04 05:11 EST ------- Added: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:15:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041015.m04AFAXX020643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 05:15 EST ------- Fixed the things above Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf-0.7-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:21:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041021.m04ALHv6021582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 05:21 EST ------- Ah my bad. Spec seems ok now Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041036.m04AaQsr023976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-04 05:36 EST ------- The url for the srpm is http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:33:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041033.m04AXYU0023334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-04 05:33 EST ------- I added the if-else stuff to the spec file addressing the python-setuptool-devel issue. I also modified the spec file to include man pages. Bumped the release tag. I don't think the if-else is needed, being that this package is only going to be in f9 for now, but I'll leave it just in case;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] New: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-bn.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-bn-20050726-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Bengali hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] New: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-hi.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-hi-20050726-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Hindi hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] New: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-pa.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-pa-20050726-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Punjabi hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] New: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ta.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ta-20060222-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Tamil hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] New: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-or.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-or-20050726-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Oriya hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427513] New: Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427513 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ne.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ne-20061217-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Nepali hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 10:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 05:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427511] New: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427511 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-mr.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-mr-20060920-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Marathi hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 11:17:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:17:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041117.m04BHBlr029664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-04 06:17 EST ------- Sorry about the wrong links: Spec URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova-0.12.1-0.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 11:15:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041115.m04BFsci029590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 11:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] New: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova.spec Description: Libnova is a general purpose, double precision, celestial mechanics, astrometry and astrodynamics library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 11:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041128.m04BSA9d031458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-04 06:28 EST ------- Ok done finally. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython-5.4-4.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython.spec I think you will want me to remove a significant amount of stuff. Rpmlint is fairly clean. There are additional html files that shouldn't be there but they were included in the build so I added them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 11:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041147.m04BlUAV000938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 06:47 EST ------- 1) Review guidelines suggests that - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). and as -devel package does not provide any .pc you should drop that. 2) Under %files section of -devel change following line %{_includedir}/libnova/*.h to %{_includedir}/libnova this will ensure that packages owns this directory also. Otherwise it will be owning only %{_includedir}/libnova/*.h files 3)This package contains COPYING which is main file for any package so add it to %doc for libnova and libnova-devel License tag should be here LGPLv2+ 4) good to add examples/*.c to %doc of %files section of -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 12:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041209.m04C93UZ004276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 12:06:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041206.m04C6VsH004184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-01-04 07:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > # to obtain some license information have a loot at ZSI/__init__.py file > You probably mean "look" instead of "loot". You're right. I will fix it when commiting to cvs > APPROVED Thank you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 12:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041208.m04C8SGo004146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-01-04 07:08 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-ZSI Short Description: Zolera SOAP Infrastructure Owners: ecik Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 12:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041237.m04CbVxM008076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 07:37 EST ------- Updated src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-1.fc9.src.rpm spec : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools.spec Quite a lot of fixes included in it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 12:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 07:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041239.m04CdmO3008253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 13:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] New: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/librtfcomp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/librtfcomp-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Library to read compressed RTF files (development files). Can decompress and recompress compressed RTF and convert from UTF8 to RTF for use in things like the AirSync protocols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 13:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041352.m04DqgVA019023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-01-04 08:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Are you are first time contributor? More or less. I have submitted one other spec. > Your spec looks ok and rpmlint is happy with your srpm too. > So i guess everything looks ok. Great. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:16:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041416.m04EG4aJ023020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail | |.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 09:16 EST ------- SHOULD: follow use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets with proper post and postun requires. As per given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch. Follow mono packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:20:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427530] New: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530 Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-2.0-0.24.fc8.src.rpm Description: Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager awesome is a tiling window manager initialy based on a dwm code rewriting. It's extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome. Windows can be managed in several layouts: tiled, maximized and floating. Each layout can be applied on the fly, optimizing the environment for the application in use and the task performed. Managing windows in tiled mode assures that no space will be wasted on your screen. No gaps, no overlap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041421.m04ELDQV023648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041423.m04ENn70023736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 09:23 EST ------- License is GPLv2+ from COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:20:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041420.m04EKb6q023485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 09:20 EST ------- rpmlint is not happy firstaidkit.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/fakplugin.1.gz ==>The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. also, Can't see this package owns /usr/libexec/firstaidkit/plugins is there any other package intended to own this directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226509] Merge Review: tzdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041426.m04EQWVj024423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tzdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226509 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-01-04 09:26 EST ------- Thanks for review. I committed a cleaned up version, and commented on a meaning and source of mysterious tzdata-base-0.tar.bz2 file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041425.m04EPvGs024375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(adel.gadllah at gmail| |.com) | ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-04 09:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > SHOULD: > follow use scrollkeeper scriptlet as given at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets with proper post and > postun requires. Fixed. > As per given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono > We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch. > Follow mono packaging guidelines. Already fixed this see comment 6 ;) New SPEC and SRPM: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/bless-0.5.2-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 14:43:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041443.m04EhFGU026636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 09:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM But Silent for SRPM. bless.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bless.i386: E: no-binary ==> This is ok as per mono packaging guidelines. + source files match upstream. 2f395e0b0c82382c49864947aea894ca bless-0.5.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present in separate -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files handled correctly. + scrollkeeper scriptlets are used. +GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 15:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041515.m04FFMYF031460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-04 10:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > > APPROVED. > thx for the review. ================ New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bless Short Description: High quality, full featured hex editor Owners: drago01 Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 15:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041522.m04FM64h032186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 jeckersb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 15:41:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041541.m04Ff74V002912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail.ru 2008-01-04 10:41 EST ------- Of course dual-head card (most cards are two-head today, you just have to enable the second head). Sorry I haven't mentioned this, I thought it is obvious. I have connected the second head to my TV but it doesn't matter much. glxinfo displays info for both heads (:0.0 and :0.1) successively no matter of the value of the DISPLAY env variable or the -display option. I tried and I can't force it to display the information exactly for :0.0, it always displays info also for :0.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 16:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041658.m04GwN6N014530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-04 11:58 EST ------- ok, rpmlint likes fak :) changed the gpl thing corrected permissions. the link for the srpm is: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-3.fc8.src.rpm Hope this time we pass :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:07:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041707.m04H7fws016364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |danms at us.ibm.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-04 12:07 EST ------- Your license file specifies "or any later version", so your License: tag should be GPLv2+. Scratch build passed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=325164 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041724.m04HOrDb018316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-04 12:24 EST ------- one more thing: >%defattr(-,root,root,0755) should be replaced with >%defattr(-,root,root,0755) (set the correct modes during %install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426990] Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041734.m04HYkw0019638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mytop - A top clone for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426990 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-04 12:34 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Closing, built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:37:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041737.m04HbWO8020245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-04 12:37 EST ------- > All issues that I have pointed were fixed, the program worked OK on my desktop > so the package is APPROVED Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sqliteman Short Description: Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 302261] Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041740.m04HevOL021228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-CSS - Object oriented access to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302261 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-04 12:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > I guess time to move this package to rpmfusion. Do you get any progress ? Nothing from the authors yet. Seems like rpmfusion not is open for business, will hold this ticket open for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 17:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 12:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226509] Merge Review: tzdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041741.m04HfJnv020854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tzdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226509 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 12:41 EST ------- Thanks for the update. One thing that I note from reading the nice comments you've added from the spec: Keep in mind that the License: tag applies only to the final binary package, so if none of the LGPLv2+ stuff makes it into the built package then there's no need to have LGPLv2+ in the License: tag. Otherwise I think this package is fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 18:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041846.m04IkXeK030557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 13:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 18:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041851.m04Ipbvo031319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 13:51 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 18:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041854.m04IsWCo031517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 13:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 19:06:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041906.m04J6p4J001060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 14:06 EST ------- Seems we're missing some procedure here. First you'll need to set up your Fedora account and then apply for sponsorship so I can click the appropriate buttons, and then once that's done you'll need to do a proper CVS request. Everything is detailed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join For now I'll unset fedora-cvs and then you can set it again when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 19:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041919.m04JJR7R003302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 ------- Additional Comments From dwalsh at redhat.com 2008-01-04 14:19 EST ------- adel you are replacing one command with the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 19:59:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427226] Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801041959.m04JxeRv009153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bless - High quality, full featured hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427226 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 20:21:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042021.m04KLgJs013037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-04 15:21 EST ------- And if you could just adjust that license tag :) John owns the review but if he has no time or interest in finishing it I would like to offer to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 20:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042025.m04KPE25013562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik at gmail.com 2008-01-04 15:25 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-ZSI Updated Fedora Owners: ecik,jbowes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 20:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:25:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042025.m04KPXnb013599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 mr.ecik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 20:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361941] Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042040.m04Ke1CW015117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-ZSI - Zolera SOAP Infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361941 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 15:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 20:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042054.m04KsIkU017375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 15:54 EST ------- Finally getting back to this... Builds and installs OK now. I'm fine with LGPLv2+ as the license tag; there was no LGPLv1 and I'd expect them to be explicit if they intended v3. I would still urge you to consider dropping the dist tag, building once for F7 and having later releases inherit this package. It would avoid the need to have to carry several 30MB packages which differ only in name. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 21:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:17:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042117.m04LHIZX021266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 16:17 EST ------- Any chance we could move forward with this now? I agree with Brad that GPLv2 seems more appropriate, and upstream can always clarify later if they can be bothered to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 21:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042119.m04LJ7WV021920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ypbind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 16:19 EST ------- Steve, is there any chance we could move forward with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 21:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] New: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cebbert at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/cebbert/kerneloops.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kerneloops.org/download/kerneloops-0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This package contains the tools to collect kernel crash signatures, and to submit them to the kerneloops.org website where the kernel crash signatures get collected and grouped for presentation to the Linux kernel developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 23:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042332.m04NWODL008545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-04 18:32 EST ------- This looks very nice now. You still have to fix the mixed use of tabs and spaces in the .spec file - it is the last thing keeping rpmlint from being quiet. Fix that and I will approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 23:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042343.m04NhtVo009931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-04 18:43 EST ------- You are right. Source code headers state that. Upgraded the srpm... http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/gimmix-0.4.2-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 4 23:51:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801042351.m04Np75x011100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-04 18:51 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mediatomb New Branches: FC-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 00:03:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050003.m05033dR012544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(jpmahowald at gmail.c | |om) ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-04 19:03 EST ------- Updated src : http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-tools-1.2.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Fixed! Not sure if John has vanished.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 00:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050019.m050JwTb014640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-04 19:19 EST ------- I reviewed it as best I could and didn't find any problems. It is GPL v2, rpmlint only throws one warning about using spaces instead of tabs in the specfile, it meets packaging and naming standards as far as I can tell etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 00:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050029.m050TCxS015747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 19:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 00:33:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050033.m050X9jf016503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-04 19:33 EST ------- Sorry updated it http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/drpython/drpython-165-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 00:47:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426733] Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050047.m050l7SM018383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Mediatomb - UPnP AV Mediaserver for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426733 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 01:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050101.m0511vJv020356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-04 20:01 EST ------- Major issues with this package. All the patches in http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/ This doesn't build. make[2]: Entering directory `/home/marc/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-themes-extras-2.20/icon-themes' make[2]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/marc/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-themes-extras-2.20/icon-themes' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/marc/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-themes-extras-2.20' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.18227 (%build) I didn't adjust any of the makefiles apart from the patches. I did a visual comparison of the two sections for make all and there is no difference apart from what is patched. Any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 01:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248632] Review Request: xalan-c - Xalan XSLT processor for C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050102.m0512tDN020597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xalan-c - Xalan XSLT processor for C Alias: xalan-c-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248632 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-04 20:02 EST ------- Suggestion about CVS dir inclusion and the project name were forwarded upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 01:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225753] Merge Review: findutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050126.m051QZ1w023590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: findutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225753 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 20:26 EST ------- Sorry for the delay here. Everything looks good to me, this package is APPROVED. Feel free to close this RAWHIDE whenever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 01:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050149.m051nFPD026001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu)| ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 20:49 EST ------- Unfortunately when you set tickets to needinfo they drop way down to the bottom of the bugzilla front page, so this ticket managed to escape my notice when I had free time over the holidays. Also unfortunately, the package in comment 24 fails to build: + desktop-file-install --dir /var/tmp/emesene-1.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/builddir/build/SOURCES/emesene.desktop /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97273: line 36: desktop-file-install: command not found error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.97273 (%install) This is because you need a build-time dependency on desktop-file-utils, not a runtime dependency. So change Requires: desktop-file-utils to BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils Now, that gets things building. But we're still left with some issues: emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/desktop.py 0644 emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/Controller.py 0644 > It is intentionally by author which user should run it by the executable > 'emesene'. OK, we'll just ignore those but perhaps you should ask upstream why these are set up as proper scripts to be executed with #! lines but aren't supposed to be executable. emesene.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A platform independent instant messaging client for the Windows Live Messenger (tm) network. emesene.noarch: E: summary-too-long A platform independent instant messaging client for the Windows Live Messenger (tm) network. These seem to be new; summary lines aren't sentences and don't end with periods, and the summary needs to be shorter than 80 characters. Why not just: Instant messaging client for hte Windows Live Messenger (tm) network Platform independence doesn't really matter for a Fedora package, since the package itself obviously isn't. emesene.noarch: E: description-line-too-long emesene is a platform independent instant messaging client for the Windows Live Messenger (tm) network. Lines in %description need to wrap at 80 characters as well. emesene.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/emesene/po/ar/LC_MESSAGES/emesen.mo (and several others) I figured out what the problem is here. It's complaining that you're not doing %lang(ar) %{_datadir}/emesene/po/ar and so on for each of the directories files in your %files section. That seems like a significant pain, but this package doesn't use the regular location for locale files and so can't use the standard %find_lang macro. Unfortunately this does make your %files list quite a bit more complicated since you have to list everything under %{appdir} separately (or construct a glob that doesn't include the po directory, but don't forget to include the po directory itself as %dir %{appdir}/po). Also, note that the Arabic .mo file seems to be missing an 'e' in its name. I don't know if that's a problem. emesene.noarch: W: empty-%post Don't just add %{nil}, which still results in an empty %post. Remove %post altogether. Generally there's no point to empty sections (except for %build, which has in the past caused some oddities when it's missing). Finally, I'm not sure I understand why you have %verify(not md5 size mtime) %{_bindir}/emesene in your %files list. What about that script is expected to change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 01:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050155.m051tX5B027012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-04 20:55 EST ------- Odd... it fails in mock here, but still produces an output file? text: postprocess: BUILD FAILED file:/builddir/build/BUILD/diveintopython-5.4/xml/common/build_common.xml:295: Execute failed: java.io.IOException: java.io.IOException: Permission denied Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 03:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:08:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050308.m0538BV1003882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 03:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:29:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050329.m053T7j7006923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-04 22:29 EST ------- needs some more work. see rpmlint is still not happy firstaidkit.noarch: I: checking firstaidkit.noarch: E: non-standard-uid /usr/share/man/man1/fakplugin.1.gz mockbuild A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody firstaidkit.noarch: E: non-standard-gid /usr/share/man/man1/fakplugin.1.gz mockbuild A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users from comment #8, also, Can't see this package owns /usr/libexec/firstaidkit/plugins is there any other package intended to own this directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 03:46:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050346.m053ku5Q009956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 rcritten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rcritten at redhat.com 2008-01-04 22:46 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kerberos Short Description: A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations Owners: rcritten Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 04:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050401.m0541eiU012195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-04 23:01 EST ------- I've got heaps of issues with my Java and I was surprised it works. Also I have selinux turned off. Same thing happens in eclipse so I'm leaning towards an selinux issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 04:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050409.m05495s7013264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-04 23:09 EST ------- Would someone comment on the following thread? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-January/msg00002.html I questioned about "release of subpackage with version different from main rpm" and the answer was generally this should not occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 04:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050438.m054cG4b016819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-04 23:38 EST ------- Interestingly, the tarball in this srpm and the one upstream are not the same; several files differ, though all seem to differ by comments and whitespace. A few rpmlint complaints: kerneloops.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 53, tab: line 1) Not a big deal. kerneloops.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/dbus-1/system.d/kerneloops.dbus I think this shouldn't be executable; the other files I see there don't seem to be. kerneloops.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/kerneloops-applet.desktop This is OK. kerneloops.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/kerneloops.1.gz This shouldn't be executable either. kerneloops.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/kerneloops Services shouldn't be enabled by default. This usually means the first entry on the chkconfig: line in the initscript should be '-'; I guess Default-Start: should be either not present, empty, or '-' as well, but I'm not sure which it should be, or if we even have anything that pays attention to it. kerneloops.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/kerneloops $prog This is bogus. Other issues: The scriptlets to start and stop the service differ from the recommended ones. For example, the %preun script won't trigger on package removals, so removing the package will leave the service still running. And it looks like a %postun script was intended (given the dependency for it) but it's not actually in the spec. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets I've not seen a Makefile call desktop-file-itself, but don't see anything wrong with the way it's being called so I don't see any reason for the spec to call it explicitly. Checklist: X source files don't match upstream: 2c5b6937983ea046d74359cb470e9002a329192998c7f4e50c1121ae6c381dc9 kerneloops-0.9.tar.gz 600aa09dbeaa439e1268f514b8b4bdcf0c51c2efbb26e23a1925e05387581b71 ../kerneloops-0.9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has some valid complaints * final provides and requires are sane: config(kerneloops) = 0.9-1.fc9 kerneloops = 0.9-1.fc9 = /bin/bash /bin/sh chkconfig config(kerneloops) = 0.9-1.fc9 initscripts libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) * %check is present but disabled; according to comments, the test suite is broken upstream. I have not attempted to test this package. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %find_lang used properly to collect translations. X service management scriptlets are not the recommended ones. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 06:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 01:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050601.m0561WH4027046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 09:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242416] Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801050938.m059cLSQ022846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive - Binaries for the TeX formatting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242416 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-05 04:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #88) > Would someone comment on the following thread? > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-January/msg00002.html > > I questioned about "release of subpackage with version different from main rpm" > and the answer was generally this should not occur. In general, yes, but for texlive it makes sense. Texlive is a bit like perl in that it is more than a single package, but a distribution. I think that some subpackages should be completly out of texlive (see above), but some will anyway stay in texlive, and for the others we are waiting for review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051025.m05AP2WI029373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide roland at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |roland at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:37:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] New: Review Request: translate-toolkit - update to version 1.0.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - update to version 1.0.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/translate-toolkit-1.0.1-2.spec SRPM URL: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/translate-toolkit-1.0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Upgrades translate toolkit to v1.0.1, places documentation correctly, creates manpages for most of the tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051038.m05AcCY3031594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 roland at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-01-05 05:38 EST ------- spec looks fine, builds and works fine for me, all the review checklist items look kosher to me. Upstream now has 1.3, so might as well upgrade. But the packaging for 1.0 looks fine as it is, and 1.0 works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:41:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051041.m05Afmbm032189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 dwayne at translate.org.za changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: translate- |Review Request: translate- |toolkit - update to version |toolkit - Translation tools |1.0.1 |for PO and XLIFF ------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za 2008-01-05 05:41 EST ------- Bug 315021 is the submission of a spec file to upgrade this package. This is my first package, I have had some discussion with the past maintainer who has not had time to upgrade the RPM. So I would need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:51:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051051.m05ApJpQ000925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 maxx at krakoa.dk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From maxx at krakoa.dk 2008-01-05 05:51 EST ------- This looks fine. Accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 10:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 05:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051057.m05AvTwa001439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 mschmidt at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-01-05 05:57 EST ------- Kevin, There must have been a mistake. I requested an F-7 branch, but an EL-5 branch was created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 12:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 07:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051206.m05C6gS0010460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-05 07:06 EST ------- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-0.1.3141svn.fc9.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm.spec This one should resolve the setuid issue. I have been talking to upstream and odccm is now started via init.d. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 13:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 08:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051307.m05D78r8019151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 13:18:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 08:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051318.m05DIOAx020505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From arjan at linux.intel.com 2008-01-05 08:18 EST ------- Thanks for the quick review; The file permission thing was a bug in the upstream package; I've fixed that. I've copied the script templates from your URL into the spec The tar mismatch was a timelag between when I built the rpms and when I ran the tar upload script; will not happen again (script will also have to run an rpmbuild ;) The "service starts by default"... this service really needs to start by default, that's the whole point of it. I've released version 0.10 of the program to fix the upstream package bugs; http://www.kerneloops.org/download/ has the tar, src.rpm and binary rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 14:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] New: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adel.gadllah at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/nvclock.spec SRPM URL: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/nvclock-0.8-0.1.b3.fc8.src.rpm Description: Nvclock allows you to tweak your Nvidia card under Linux. It features overclocking, hardware monitoring, tweaking of OpenGL settings, and much more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 14:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051417.m05EHnaE029655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rpm at timj.co.uk 2008-01-05 09:17 EST ------- Unfortunately no. For the record, summarising some offline discussions with spot: a) some parts of the the package which are GPL'd (hdsploader, mixartloader, pcxhrloader, us2xyloader,vxloader) don't specify a license version for the GPL, containing only "Distributable under GPL". -> see https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=3411 (no response from upstream) b) the "aica" firmware (aica/license.txt) is under a "KOS" license which spot says is the same as BSD, so that's OK. c) One of the firmwares (emi_26_62/license.txt) is clearly not OK for Fedora: "This firmware is for the Emagic EMI 2|6 Audio Interface The firmware contained herein is Copyright (c) 1999-2002 Emagic as an unpublished work. This notice does not imply unrestricted or public access to this firmware which is a trade secret of Emagic, and which may not be reproduced, used, sold or transferred to any third party without Emagic's written consent. All Rights Reserved. This firmware may not be modified and may only be used with the Emagic EMI 2|6 Audio Interface. Distribution and/or Modification of any driver which includes this firmware, in whole or in part, requires the inclusion of this statement." -> see http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-January/005020.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 14:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:39:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217259] Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051439.m05EdNFW031912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-firmware - Firmware for several ALSA-supported sound card https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217259 rpm at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 14:40:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051440.m05Eeue1032409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-05 09:40 EST ------- Taking review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 16:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051604.m05G46uU010407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-05 11:04 EST ------- Almost okay. For 2.3.10-9: * EVR specific Requires between subpackages - Usually the dependency between subpackages must be EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific, not just Version. i.e. dbxml-utils must have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}", for example. * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible, otherwise please comment about not supporting parallel make. * Timestamps - Please try to keep timestamps on installed files when possible. * Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" commands * Defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Undefined non-weak symbol - "$ rpmlint dbxml" returns lots of undefined non-weak symbols ! Note rpmlint can be used for installed rpm. You can also check this by $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libdbxml-2.3.so (on i386) For this package this cannot be ignored because this package provides -devel subpackage and these symbols causes linkage failure. Perhaps libdbxml-2.3.so must be linked agaist some more libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 16:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051632.m05GWJuW013852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-05 11:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drpython Short Description: DrPython is a highly customizable cross-platform ide Owners: mwiriadi Branches: F-8 devel InitialCC: mwiriadi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 16:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051632.m05GWhmI013903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 16:39:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 11:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051639.m05GdMG2014591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051716.m05HGOr0019609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-05 12:16 EST ------- My bad a few more build requires. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython-5.4-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:19:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:19:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] New: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-qvalue/R-qvalue.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-qvalue/R-qvalue-1.12.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: It takes a list of p-values resulting from the simultaneous testing of many hypotheses and estimates their q-values. The q-value of a test measures the proportion of false positives incurred (called the false discovery rate) when that particular test is called significant. Various plots are automatically generated, allowing one to make sensible significance cut-offs. Several mathematical results have recently been shown on the conservative accuracy of the estimated q-values from this software. The software can be applied to problems in genomics, brain imaging, astrophysics, and data mining. This package is a part of the Bioconductor (bioconductor.org) project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:21:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051721.m05HLi25020286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-05 12:21 EST ------- I have uploaded the latest version of the package I put a GPLv2+ license tag as I get no answer to the mail that I sent to the Bioconductor-devel mailing list ( https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioc-devel/2007-December/001441.html maybe after the hollidays...) I also add R-qvalue to the require as this later version suggested it (I create the review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 ) SPEC: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-maanova/R-maanova.spec SRPM: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-maanova/R-maanova-1.8.0-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051729.m05HTpVh020987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051729.m05HTS7K020944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-05 12:29 EST ------- I have uploaded the latest version removing the %dist tag. Could you have a look and let me know if I did it correctly ? What about the CVS ? Do I manage them in the same way ? Thanks for your help, SPEC http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2.spec SRPM http://www.pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2/R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051734.m05HYFUF021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-05 12:34 EST ------- Upstream still has not released a new version would it be better to close this or grab the patches from upstream and release this 0.4 version with the patches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 17:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 12:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051734.m05HYWW8021621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-05 12:34 EST ------- rpmlint output clean: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result nvclock-gtk.i386: W: no-documentation Source md5 matches upstream: eab0a35a79f0165310be759b043deedb nvclock0.8b3.tar.gz Builds in mock: devel/i386, F-7/x86_64 Problems: 1. License field says GPLv2+, but src/libc_wrapper.c has MIT license (GPLv2+ compatible) src/backend/i2c.c and nv40.c have some additional (apart from the GPL) clauses - can you verify that they don't impose any restrictions over GPL terms? 2. This part could use a little more spacing for legibility: [...] %package gtk Summary: Nvclock gtk frontend Group: Applications/System %description gtk This package contains the nvclock gui. [...] 3. make is called without %{?_smp_mflag} and no comment is present explaining why. 4. Since the icon you add is 48x48, why not put it in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ ? Of course, then you need to add %post gtk touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi %postun gtk touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi 5. Why aren't you building the QT interface? AFAICT it builds and works just as well as the GTK interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051805.m05I5BFc026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-05 13:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 Short Description: BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 Owners: pingou Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051812.m05ICcTW026848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-05 13:12 EST ------- Oops. ;( Not sure how I got that confused there... Sorry about that. Would you like me to leave the EL-5 branch? Or would you prefer it be removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051818.m05IIGrV027553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-05 13:18 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051823.m05IN38h028319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-05 13:23 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051836.m05IaCxU030178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-05 13:36 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051838.m05Ic9qh030308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-05 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Problems: > 1. License field says GPLv2+, but > src/libc_wrapper.c has MIT license (GPLv2+ compatible) so should I add GPLv2+ and MIT ? > src/backend/i2c.c and nv40.c have some additional (apart from the GPL) clauses - > can you verify that they don't impose any restrictions over GPL terms? I asked upstream and got this response "it are just some pieces from xfree86, the same stuff that is now in the xorg nv driver" > 2. This part could use a little more spacing for legibility: > [...] > %package gtk > Summary: Nvclock gtk frontend > Group: Applications/System > %description gtk > This package contains the nvclock gui. > [...] ok > 3. make is called without %{?_smp_mflag} and no comment is present explaining why. because the build fails; have not yet investigated why .. will add a comment. > 4. Since the icon you add is 48x48, why not put it in > %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/ > ? > Of course, then you need to add > %post gtk > touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor > if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then > %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : > fi > > %postun gtk > touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor > if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then > %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : > fi OK, will do. > 5. Why aren't you building the QT interface? AFAICT it builds and works just as > well as the GTK interface. > Because its unmaintained and upstream is planning to drop it completly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051841.m05IfLto030899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-05 13:41 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051846.m05IkL2k031631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-05 13:46 EST ------- Fixed SPEC/SRPM: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/nvclock.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/nvclock-0.8-0.2.b3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 18:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 13:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051845.m05IjLh8031528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-05 13:45 EST ------- need fas account names not email addresses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 19:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051923.m05JNZ5Z004126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 19:36:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051936.m05JaHsW005951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-05 14:36 EST ------- Thanks Roland! Yeah, I'll put the latest into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 19:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051938.m05JcCvR006081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-05 14:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_wsgi Short Description: A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache Owners: jbowes Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 19:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 14:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249236] Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801051953.m05JrAHM007904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-style-domino - KDE style with a soft look https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249236 ------- Additional Comments From sereinity at online.fr 2008-01-05 14:53 EST ------- It doesn't build on mock. rpmlint are Ok. Some issues that should be fixed: - No pseudonyms. Use your real name and your personal/fedoraproject email. - Don't use empty file for the doc (NEWS & README) - Put all .la file on a -devel package (I have seen .la on -libs kde-packages, it's better ?) - Use "3" suffix to kde-packages (if possible) - Build require /usr/lib/libkdecorations.la (kdebase-libs) require /usr/include/kde/kcommondecoration.h (kdebase3-devel who require kdebase-libs, and kdelibs3-devel) - call ldconfig in %post & %postun Please note that + items are OK, - items should be fixed or justified, ~ items needs further investigation. * MUST items + Respect naming guidelines. + License: GPLv2 OK + The spec file must be written in American English. + The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + Compile on i386 and x86_64 at least. + locales are properly handled. - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + Not relocatable. + A package must own all directories that it creates. + A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files must be set properly. + Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + The package must contain code, or permissable content. + Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) + If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files must be in a -devel package. + Static libraries must be in a -static package. + Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). + If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ~ In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ~ Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. + Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: + Includes licenses text. + The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. - Builds in mock ~ runs without segmentation faults + The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. + No scriptlets. ~ If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 20:24:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:24:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052024.m05KOB5K011842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 20:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052023.m05KNiix011801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-05 15:23 EST ------- rpmlint has one complaint: hunspell-bn.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-1 20050726-1.fc9 Your changelog says 1.0-1 while the version is a bit different. Also, you should include the Copyright file as %doc. * source files match upstream: ad4f2133f7696a1d545572ab6724f2cc946a526025c6aeb84b67fdb2dd7b1bd5 bn-demo.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-bn = 20050726-1.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I don't know Bengali so I'm afraid I can't test this. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 20:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052042.m05KgTXj014193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 ------- Additional Comments From mschmidt at redhat.com 2008-01-05 15:42 EST ------- Kevin, Jabbim won't work in RHEL5. It does not have the required dependencies. Please remove the EL-5 branch. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 20:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052049.m05Kn8AD014843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 acme at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 20:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 15:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052048.m05KmZ1b014854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 acme at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From acme at redhat.com 2008-01-05 15:48 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dwarves Short Description: DWARF tools Owners: acme Branches: F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 21:47:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:47:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052147.m05LlKhh022167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-05 16:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 21:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 16:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052145.m05LjQMe021939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-05 16:45 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 22:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:10:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052210.m05MAgmT025546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-05 17:10 EST ------- You could spin up a package with the patches for now, and we can get it reviewed and in, and you can update to the new version once it's released? How does that sound? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 22:25:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052225.m05MPDE3027119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 acme at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |acme at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 22:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234667] Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052225.m05MPWbM027288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dwarves - DWARF Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234667 acme at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 22:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052231.m05MVid6028007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-05 17:31 EST ------- As with the other package, you should include the Copyright file as %doc. That's the only issue I see, so I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in. * source files match upstream: 2e78f20096dfa254fe92ea7cf6ec3ed19cdf664e68eea964c56651c8e79e8345 hi-demo.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-hi = 20050726-1.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; I don't know any Hindi so I cannot test this. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 5 23:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801052327.m05NRjB4001975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-05 18:27 EST ------- removing the FE_REVIEW blocker too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 00:04:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:04:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060004.m0604iJ0006900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-05 19:04 EST ------- ping again ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 00:13:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424881] Review Request: fontmatrix - Font manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060013.m060Dsqx008181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fontmatrix - Font manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424881 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-05 19:13 EST ------- fixing the bug resolution -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 00:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060028.m060SA8R009598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 00:42:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 19:42:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060042.m060gipB011539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-05 19:42 EST ------- Well then, everything seems to be in order. No further comments. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 01:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060123.m061NK5U016750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-05 20:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Well then, everything seems to be in order. No further comments. > > APPROVED. Ok, thx for the review! ============== New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nvclock Short Description: Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards Owners: drago01 Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 01:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060134.m061YYMM017926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-05 20:34 EST ------- I have built it for F8 with the patches but when I try to build it using mock this is the error I get. Spec file and SRPM: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/preload/preload.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/preload/preload-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm In file included from /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h:74, from common.h:20, from cmdline.c:23: /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:108: error: expected identifier or '(' before '/' token /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:109: error: expected identifier or '(' before '/' token /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:210: error: expected identifier before '/' token /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gtestutils.h:224: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '/' token make[2]: *** [cmdline.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/preload-0.4/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/preload-0.4' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73504 (%build) I'm not to sure if thats an issue with preload or the devel package itself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 01:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060140.m061eLYk018881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 03:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 22:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060314.m063Ebsn029027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-05 22:14 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-hi Short Description: Hindi hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 04:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:25:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060425.m064P7BN005852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-05 23:25 EST ------- With the help of Kevin, I have completed the cvs-import.sh for F-7, F-8, and devel as per the instructions on page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join under the heading Import Your Package. It appears from the next two headings on the web page mentioned above, Checkout the module and Tag Your Branches, that the next step is to check out a fresh copy of cppad and then execute the command make tag in each of the branch directoies; i.e., F-7, F-8, and devel. But it appears that the branches have already been tagged. To be specific, in response to make tag in the devel branch, I get the message: ERROR: Tag cppad-20071229-1_fc9 has been already created. The following tags have been created so far cppad-20071229-1_fc9:devel:bradbell:1199571942 cppad-20071229-1_fc7:F-7:bradbell:1199572233 cppad-20071229-1_fc8:F-8:bradbell:1199572567 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed P.S. As I understand it, I will need 'koji' install to properly execute the make build command. I am currently using Cygwin and there does not seem to be a version of koji for that system. I am trying to get a version of Fedora up in a virtual environment on my home machine, but I am having some problems doing so. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 04:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:41:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060441.m064fb5b007699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-05 23:41 EST ------- Updated links with adding Copyright file Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-or.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-or-20050726-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 04:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:44:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060444.m064iQhR007797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-05 23:44 EST ------- Updated links with adding Copyright file Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-pa.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-pa-20050726-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 04:44:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060444.m064idRt007857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-05 23:44 EST ------- Updated links with adding Copyright file Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ta.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-ta-20060222-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 05:42:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 00:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801060542.m065g76Z014904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review-, | |needinfo?(danms at us.ibm.com) ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-06 00:42 EST ------- Release: what's extra_release there for? BuildRoot: value acceptable, but two better choices are available. Source: misssing full URL to the file. Why explicit Requires for libxml2 and libvirt versions? README lists libvirt-0.2.3, while spec Requires libvirt >= 0.3.2. typo? somewhere? %pre needs a comment explaining what you're trying to do. It looks like the provider-register call in %pre is trying to unregister (e.g. -d is delete). It took me a while to figure it out, because you are invoking scripts that are part of its own (not yet installed) package (which fails on first install, so you hit the ||true clause). %post: don't automatically restart the service, use cond-restart. You don't want it started on initial install from kickstart, for example. $ rpmlint *.rpm libvirt-cim.src: W: strange-permission libvirt-cim.spec 0600 otherwise file permissions look ok, no other lint warnings. rpaths used, which need to be removed. Drop files in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ adding /usr/lib*/cmpi/. Remove *.so files. Review criteria: rpmlint attached, trivial spec permission fix at checkin time OK package name OK spec file name OK with changes above, should meet packaging guidelines FIX+RECHECK license LGPLv2.1+ OK license field matches OK license included in %doc OK spec is English OK spec mostly legible, modulo comments above. OK can't presently judge source matches upstream, until formal upstream tarball is released. FIX+RECHECK package compiles on at least x86_64 F9(rawhide) in mock. OK spec doesn't use locales OK ldconfig called appropriately OK package not relocatable OK package owns its directories OK no duplicate files OK defaddr line present, permissions sane OK %clean OK macros OK contains code OK no large docs no header files OK no static libs OK no pkgconfig files OK .so files present but not in a -devel package, delete them. FIX+RECHECK no .la files OK no GUI files OK directory ownership OK %install cleans first OK all filesname UTF-8 OK license included OK translated summary & description, not present. SHOULD, but OK package builds in mock on x86_64. OK package not tested. scriptlets sane, if commented. FIX+RECHECK no subpackages OK no .pc files OK no file deps OK Please fix and repost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 11:50:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 06:50:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061150.m06BopMq027196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-06 06:50 EST ------- Source rpm + spec file: * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml-2.3.10-9.fc9.src.rpm * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml/dbxml.spec Scratch builds: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=328170 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=328175 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=328180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 12:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 07:20:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061220.m06CKGhC031040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2008-01-06 07:20 EST ------- rpmlint says : - missing-mandatory-lsb-keyword Provides in /etc/rc.d/init.d/odccm - zero-length /usr/share/doc/odccm-0.11/NEWS (not really a problem IMHO) Odccm listens by default on all interfaces, and is started by default in the init script. Please make it listen on localhost if possible, and if it's not don't start it by default (security risk) Thanks, it's looking good ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 12:29:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 07:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427662] New: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427662 Summary: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/cpipe/cpipe.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/cpipe/cpipe-3.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Cpipe copies its standard input to its standard output while measuring the time it takes to read an input buffer and write an output buffer. Statistics of average throughput and the total amount of bytes copied are printed to the standard error output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 14:28:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:28:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061428.m06EStj0014079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 09:28 EST ------- Well, from next time please change the release number of srpm every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 14:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061440.m06EercB015817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-06 09:40 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mod_wsgi New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 14:44:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061444.m06Eip42015987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 09:44 EST ------- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (dbxml) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 14:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061451.m06EpQO7017095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 09:51 EST ------- Once dbxml is imported into koji dist-f9 branch, I will try to rebuild this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] New: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Xdvik, the kpathsea version of xdvi, is a previewer for DVI files produced e.g. by the TeX or troff typesetting systems. Some background: Jindrich Novy's monumental and impressive texlive packaging effort includes xdvik since it is part of the TeXLive 2007 release. However, TeXLive isn't the upstream for xdvik, and Patrice Dumas posted a request on fedora-devel asking for people to volunteer standalone packages for components of texlive which have their own upstream. xdvik is such a package. This package builds on F8, but still needs a fair bit of work, and is not yet review ready. However, I wanted to get it out in the open early to get feedback. What I have done: * Sun Jan 6 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 22.84.13-1 - Initial package based on the texlive.spec by Jindrich Novy - Updated to latest upstream xdvik and Japanese xdvik - Reviewed all patches relating to xdvi in texlive.spec and cherry picked those that are still needed - Reworked the patch to allow building of xdvik and pxdvik What still needs to be done: Currently this builds against the bundled kpathsea library sources in the tarball. We should be building against the kpathsea(-devel) packages instead. Lots of missing Requires and BuildRequires. Needs building in Mock for devel and rpmlint checking. And testing lots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061523.m06FNgPt021117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:23 EST ------- For 1.5.0-0: * Source tarball - The source tarball in your srpm is different from what I downloaded from the URL written as Source0. ----------------------------------------------------------- $ ls -al *1.5.0*gz *1.5.0*/*gz -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 356056 2008-01-04 04:02 libvpd-1.5.0-0/libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 351239 2007-12-28 16:56 libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz $ md5sum *1.5.0*gz *1.5.0*/*gz 3743138471c729313e5a7482bb2f0f69 libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz 696ebca1f4b11dfee3beee0ae25b09a7 libvpd-1.5.0-0/libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz ----------------------------------------------------------- * pkgconfig dependency - The package which contains pkgconfig .pc files should have "Requires: pkgconfig". This means that libvpd-devel (not libvpd) should have this Requires. * Timestamps - As said in comment 18, please try to use --------------------------------------------------------------- %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" --------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. * Defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Documents - Please add the following files to %doc. --------------------------------------------------------------- AUTHORS --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061527.m06FRJVE022546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:27 EST ------- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received by 2008-01-17. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061542.m06FgD4j024342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.matsuu at gmail.com, | |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:42 EST ------- CC-ing Matsuura-san. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:43:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] New: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/gnome-nds-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files. Nintendo DS files contain an embedded 16 colours, 32x32 icon, which helps identify the ROM files. This application can display the images in Nautilus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061556.m06FuPma025288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:56 EST ------- Please build this package on koji and request to push on bodhi system for F-8/7 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 15:57:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374791] Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061557.m06FvsDS025390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - simple C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374791 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-06 10:57 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received by 2008-01-18. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 16:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://themonospot.googlecode.com/files/themonospot-0.6.5.SPEC SRPM URL: http://themonospot.googlecode.com/files/themonospot-RPMS-0.6.5-1.i386.rpm Description: is a simple application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow: * Video codec used * Frame size * Average video bitrate * File size * Total time * Frame rate * Total frames * Info data * Packet Bitstream * User data (in MOVI chunk) * Audio codec used * Average audio bitrate * Audio channels With themonospot is also possible modify FourCC informations (FourCC code in video chunk and FourCC description in stream header) and also change some problematic UserData values for table players (it set the value to DivX999b000p) Themonospot is multilanguage (from release 0.6.5) using language files in languages folder -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 17:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061702.m06H29Ic001910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-06 12:02 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dbxml Short Description: An embeddable XML database Owners: mzazrive Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 17:32:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:32:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061732.m06HWb2A006084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-06 12:32 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 17:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 313351] Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061733.m06HXhNH006133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_wsgi - A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=313351 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-06 12:33 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 17:35:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061735.m06HZnXv007426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-06 12:35 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason to disallow cvsextras? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 17:39:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:39:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061739.m06Hdesq007723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-06 12:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 18:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061836.m06IavEI015910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 18:38:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:38:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061838.m06IchFr015972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 i at stingr.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(i at stingr.net) | ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-01-06 13:38 EST ------- Sorry for the delay, I'm on a extended family emergency^Wvacation, but I'll be able to access my development environment in next 3 days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 18:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801061858.m06Iwd0R016803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-06 13:58 EST ------- Sorry, too late. Spec URL: http://www.masahase.mydns.jp/SRPMS/pards.spec SRPM URL: http://www.masahase.mydns.jp/SRPMS/pards-0.4-5.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 20:48:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 15:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062048.m06Kmbqf030964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-06 15:48 EST ------- http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/sagator.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/sagator/fedora/testing/8/SRPMS/sagator-1.0.0-0beta33.fc8.src.rpm Changes: - more macros used, I think all which can be used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409011] Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062103.m06L3Avu001690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409011 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-06 16:03 EST ------- done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:22:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062122.m06LMaGQ004308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: themonospot |Review Request: themonospot |- pplication that can be |-application that can be |used to scan an avi file and|used to scan an avi file and |extract some informations |extract some informations |about audio and video data |about audio and video data |flow |flow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:22:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot - pplication that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062122.m06LMBrk004269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot - pplication that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |used to scan an avi file and | |extract some informations | |about audio and video data | |flow ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-06 16:22 EST ------- Needs lots of work. Most obvious errors: - GPL is no longer a valid license tag. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/ for details - Applications/AudioVideo is not one of the standard groups - your %descriptions lacks a subject for the phrase that is included in the first paragraph. I also suggest to use "Using themonospot it is also possible to modify FourCC informations " for the second paragraph. - the %distribution and %vendor tags should not be included in your spec (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) - Please use rpm macros instead of absolute paths (i.e. replace "./configure --prefix=/usr" with "%configure --prefix=%{_prefix}" or even better just with %configure ) - the desktop file should be installed according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755, not using ln;pixmaps should probably be included in %files - the .pc file should probably not be included - the version reported by the most recent entry in the changelog is not identical to the one of the package (0.6.5 versus 0.6.5-1) And last but not least, you should provide access to the src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] New: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/fprint_demo/fprint_demo.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/fprint_demo/fprint_demo-0.4-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: Graphical tool to demonstrate how works for the fprint drivers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:31:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062131.m06LVkFw004888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-06 16:31 EST ------- Uhm, you should also take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 21:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 16:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241588] qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062157.m06LvJpI008771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: qfaxreader - a monochrome/color multipage .TIFF files visualisation utility designed for viewing faxes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241588 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 22:16:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062216.m06MG0Mi011403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-06 17:15 EST ------- If Alex doesn't want to maintain this (or any other mono based packages in EPEL), I'm more than happy to step up to the plate... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 22:24:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062224.m06MOwOU012297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 22:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062236.m06Ma0pB014266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-06 17:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) I've updated all of these in the spec file and checked it in. The SRPM hasn't been updated yet/ > No vendor or packager fields needed: please remove. > > Is there a web page for the package that could go in the url field? > Maybe something like http://search.cpan.org/dist/ParseLex? > > It would be nice to use caps for the rpm fields: eg "Name", "Version", etc. > > %NVR is unused. > > make test should be move to a %check section and then %maketest would not be needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 22:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062237.m06MblvS013131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-06 17:37 EST ------- David - you up for reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 22:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062240.m06Me1Q1013224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-06 17:40 EST ------- John - you out there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 23:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062312.m06NCkwQ017681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-06 18:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This what rpmlint has to say: > [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint documentation-devel-0.26-1.fc9.src.rpm > documentation-devel.src: W: invalid-license GPL > > I feel GPL+ is a better option. Spec file updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 23:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254048] Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062316.m06NGfFB018425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: biosdevname - udev helper for naming devices per BIOS names https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254048 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 23:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189093] Review Request: mono-debugger In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062316.m06NGdT5018373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189093 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 23:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] New: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nsheridan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Hi there. This is my first package and I'm looking for a sponsor. Spec URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/python-urwid.spec SRPM URL: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/python-urwid-0.9.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Urwid is a console user interface library for Python. It includes many features useful for text console application developers: - Fluid interface resizing (xterm window resizing / fbset on Linux console) - Web application display mode using Apache and CGI - Support for UTF-8, simple 8-bit and CJK encodings - Multiple text alignment and wrapping modes built-in - Ability create user-defined text layout classes - Simple markup for setting text attributes - Powerful list box that handles scrolling between different widget types - List box contents may be managed with a user-defined class - Flexible edit box for editing many different types of text - Buttons, check boxes and radio boxes - Customizable layout for all widgets - Easy interface for creating HTML screen shots -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 6 23:44:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801062344.m06NiMmx022611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-06 18:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) All these changes have been made to the spec file. > Here is what would suit this better: > > 1. setup -q, but i guess this should be ok. > > 2. %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > 3. Group: I would rather choose: Development/Libraries > > 4. License: GPL+ or Artistic would be more appropriate. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070114.m071Ehkg001498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:14 EST ------- moodbar-0.1.2-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409011] Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070112.m071CjaW001095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409011 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:12 EST ------- pam_fprint-0.2-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pam_fprint' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070117.m071HLFZ002590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:17 EST ------- python-xlrd-0.6.1-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-xlrd' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070113.m071DkWu001353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:13 EST ------- R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-5 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070117.m071H24C002599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:17 EST ------- python-xlrd-0.6.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-xlrd' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:17:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070117.m071Hi5i002817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:17 EST ------- libsvm-2.84-9.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsvm' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:17:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254091] Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070117.m071HKYI002679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsvm - A Library for Support Vector Machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254091 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:17 EST ------- libsvm-2.84-9.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libsvm' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070119.m071Jire003653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-06 20:19 EST ------- moodbar-0.1.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:26:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:26:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070126.m071QGZZ005863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: fprint_demo |Review Request: fprint_demo |- Demo of the fprint drivers|- Demo of the fprint drivers Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 01:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070140.m071efLV009042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 nsheridan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070234.m072YQ42015640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-06 21:34 EST ------- Looks good to me. * source files match upstream: 079e450c3920d3a94c83b08fd90eb7b365a4fbb87b4ece1935f414a02a442502 or-demo.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-or = 20050726-2.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. I have not tested this package as I do not speak Oriya. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070251.m072pWKv018034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ssalevan at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070249.m072ngGT017497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-06 21:49 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 8cfb064f130688a668ec431ea22def9561fccc07968611b8f2de2f92a9e025b7 pa-demo.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-pa = 20050726-2.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I could not test this package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070250.m072oYIl017860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070249.m072nm7I017458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] New: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssalevan at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thekobayashimaru.org/mzx/megazeux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thekobayashimaru.org/mzx/megazeux-2.8.1-h.src.rpm Description: Megazeux is a text-character driven game creation system with support for sound and music, and an object-oriented programming language known as Robotic. Due to the unique flexibilities of this language, a vast array of games utilizing the Megazeux engine have been created. This is my first submission (and I'm still a little fresh at composing RPMs), so I'm seeking a sponsor to review my work. Many thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427511] Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070254.m072sgSP018169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427511 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-06 21:54 EST ------- * source files match upstream: 57e7fd9de77a128e582c5bd0d9be3876827219b02de2331ee8085dabeef3651f mr_IN.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-mr = 20060920-1.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427513] Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070259.m072xVvS018928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427513 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 02:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070259.m072xJ7X018891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-06 21:59 EST ------- I don't see any mention of the GPL version in use; how did you determine that the file is under GPLv2+? It seems that without any explicit mention, GPL+ is appropriate. Otherwise this package is fine. The issue is pretty minor; I'll go ahead and approve this package and you can double check the GPL version when you check in. * source files match upstream: c3ff9fe4f17dc204c983ee62add444342be5d6b1ff306ab2c6e47711b707b3b8 ta-demo.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-ta = 20060222-2.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070306.m07362u9020445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:06 EST ------- Thanks a lot for reviewing, Changes made: Spec File: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova.spec.txt SRPM: http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/libnova-0.12.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070312.m073Cnha020884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:12 EST ------- tibbs, I determined version based on COPYING file. I got confused on 2 license files and took COPYING as main license file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070313.m073Dwsl020947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu) ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:13 EST ------- updated package Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-bn.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hunspell/hunspell-bn-20050726-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070335.m073Zo7g023753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:35 EST ------- make it yes. I have no problem in making cvsextras commit to yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070336.m073avGF023964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:36 EST ------- Thanks tibbs for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-or Short Description: Oriya hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070337.m073bmbn024023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:37 EST ------- Thanks tibbs for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-pa Short Description: Punjabi hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:38:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427722] New: Review Request: xsettings-kde - XSettings Daemon for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427722 Summary: Review Request: xsettings-kde - XSettings Daemon for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/xsettings-kde/xsettings-kde.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/xsettings-kde/xsettings-kde-0.6-2.src.rpm Description: This package provides a XSettings daemon for KDE Desktop Environment. It allows XSettings aware applications (all GTK+ 2 and GNOME 2 applications) to be informed instantly of changes in KDE configuration, such as theme name, default font and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427511] Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070338.m073c7cP024055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427511 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:38 EST ------- Thanks tibbs for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mr Short Description: Marathi hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:39:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070339.m073dEgx024112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:39 EST ------- Thanks tibbs for review. Will make License tag to GPL+ while cvs import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ta Short Description: Tamil hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:42:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427722] Review Request: xsettings-kde - XSettings Daemon for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070342.m073gnll024732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsettings-kde - XSettings Daemon for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427722 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-06 22:42 EST ------- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=329974 rpmlint clean. Tested only in a KDE3 envionment (so far). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 03:46:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070346.m073kC8G025284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu)| ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-06 22:46 EST ------- tibbs, I am really sorry to make this bugzilla to needinfo on you. I thought may be this got removed from your priority review radar list. and thought if you are reviewed other packages then I thought better not to loose it and build it together with other reviews. once again sorry to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 04:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070421.m074Lxp4029657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-06 23:21 EST ------- Hi, I cannot sponsor you, i am just doing a first review of your package. [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint megazeux-2.8.1-h.src.rpm megazeux.src:35: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT megazeux.src:37: W: setup-not-quiet megazeux.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install megazeux.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 3) megazeux.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games megazeux.src: W: invalid-license GPL Some hints for the non very obvious ones: 1. Replace setup with setup -q 2. For %install, it is advised that you start with a clean build root. 3. Licensing: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 04:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070418.m074I9lY029117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-06 23:18 EST ------- Please make yourself familiar with the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines Needswork: - Package is noarch => remove OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from main make call - Remove the %doc from the mans in %files mans are automatically %doc'ed by rpm - This construct is unnecessarily complex: %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Parse %{perl_vendorlib}/Parse/*.pm %{perl_vendorlib}/Parse would suffice - The chmod -R u+w %{_builddir}/%{pkgname}-%{version} in %prep is superfluous, remove it. - The construct as being used in %clean is being frowned upon in fedora. Use %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} instead. - Your %buildroot doesn't comply to the packaging guidelines. - The %defines at the beginning of the spec are unused. Remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 04:36:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:36:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070436.m074a2Xa031387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-06 23:36 EST ------- 4. What i meant is GPL+ "OR" Artistic not "GPL+ or Artistic" Also have you rebuild the srpm with the new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070503.m0753IuZ002531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From ssalevan at redhat.com 2008-01-07 00:03 EST ------- Thanks very much for the heads-up. I fixed these issues, and now rpmlint runs cleanly through the new src RPM, available from the original link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 04:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:59:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070459.m074xfgq001557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-06 23:59 EST ------- Shouldn't the license be LGPLv2+? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:29:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070529.m075TP0X005020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-07 00:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #23) > * Timestamps > - As said in comment 18, please try to use > --------------------------------------------------------------- > %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="%{__install} -p" > --------------------------------------------------------------- > to keep timestamps on installed files. Mamoru, which clue stick does it take to hit you with until you finally comprehend that you are enforcing a personal preference of yours for NO TECHNICAL reasons? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:33:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070533.m075Xnv9006096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-07 00:33 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:51:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070551.m075pxRq007850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-07 00:51 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070551.m075pqU1007791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-07 00:51 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427511] Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070551.m075puiM008315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427511 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-07 00:51 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427513] Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070552.m075qFm7008367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427513 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 00:52 EST ------- rpmlint complains: hunspell-ne.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL A version is mandatory these days. I can't see one indicated anywhere in this package, though, and I'm not sure it's safe to just assume LGPLv2+. * source files match upstream: b19a287970de63d246b4710f15ff6a039527a394e88b17be1d0ffc90753ece72 ne_NP_dict.zip * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has a valid complaint * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell-ne = 20061217-1.fc9 = hunspell * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * acceptable content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 05:50:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070550.m075oQvw008113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 00:50 EST ------- Packaging looks ok. except I think you should install icon file /usr/share/pixmaps Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 32e663a938e19801bdd17105d5c4d310 fprint_demo-0.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present in separate -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop files handled correctly. + no scriptlets are used. + GUI app. APPROVED. SHOULD: Change install location of fprint-icon.png to /usr/share/pixmaps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 06:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070603.m0763mFU010001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 01:03 EST ------- No need to apologize; it's bugzilla that makes it difficult as anything set to needinfo from me should show up at the very top of the bugzilla front page, not down near the bottom. I guess I should write up an enhancement request. In any case, this package looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 06:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070611.m076B578011191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 01:11 EST ------- Thanks. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-bn Short Description: Bengali hunspell dictionaries Owners: pnemade Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 06:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070617.m076HpuW011313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-07 01:17 EST ------- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 06:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 01:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070621.m076L9aW012399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 01:21 EST ------- Looks much better. A new rpmlint warning has appeared: kerneloops.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/kerneloops.dbus Looking at whether other packages have these files marked %config, it seems that many packages do, although several like NetworkManager, ConsoleKit, cups and gdm don't. However, all package I have installed on my system actually call the files *.conf. We really don't have any guidelines here as far as I can tell so honestly I'm not going to complain. Everything now matches upstream: ea3bb4779ec74e2af5556d8551dbde6460c41930d61d0f5ef9924dfb42229deb kerneloops-0.10.tar.gz The permission issues are fixed. About enabling the service by default, you could make the argument that the whole point of httpd is to serve web pages, and yet it's not started by default. However, this service isn't network-facing and so I can't really make a security argument. And my personal preferences aside, we don't have any specific guideline regarding the issue, so I won't block on it. So, it seems that all the complaints I had are either addressed or moot. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:14:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427507] Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070714.m077E0kw019011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-bn - Bengali hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427507 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:14 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070711.m077BTtW018882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 Bug 240497 depends on bug 240500, which changed state. Bug 240500 Summary: Review Request: R-Biobase 1.16.1 - Functions that are needed by many other packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240500 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-07 02:11 EST ------- There are the corrected files SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest.spec SRPM http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.18.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070714.m077EcDb019085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:14 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070714.m077EN2D019024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:14 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427511] Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070715.m077F25R019524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mr - Marathi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427511 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:15 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427510] Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070714.m077EoEq019148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-pa - Punjabi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427510 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:14 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427512] Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070715.m077FING019440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ta - Tamil hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427512 pnemade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pnemade at redhat.com 2008-01-07 02:15 EST ------- Built for devel and F-8 successfully. Thanks to tibbs and Jens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 07:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 02:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070750.m077o6OZ024066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-07 02:50 EST ------- Full review: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Spec file matches base package name. - Spec has consistant macro usage. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. x License - License field in spec matches x License file is not included in package - Spec in American English - Spec is legible. - Sources match upstream md5sum: 2a09d139ef362f0675c99e2e6d5ebe30 multtest_1.18.0.tar.gz - Package does not need ExcludeArch x BuildRequires: Should have R-devel, not just R for arch-specific R packages - Spec handles locales/find_lang (N/A) - Package is not relocatable - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - Package has a correct %clean section. - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content. - Doc subpackage needed/used. - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - .so files in -devel subpackage. - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - .la files are removed. - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - Package owns all the directories it creates. - rpmlint output (can be ignored according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R): R-multtest.i386: W: one-line-command-in-%post /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh R-multtest.i386: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh - final provides and requires are sane: - Has dist tag Issues: 1. Does not build OK on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=330245 2. Does this package actually need R-Biobase at build-time? i.e. does the install script actually check for it, or does it just need it at install time 3. BR: R-devel 4. Might be good to include something about this being part of Bioconductor in %summary These two can be dealt with after import: 3. It isn't clear what version of LGPL is meant from http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.1/bioc/html/multtest.html please ask upstream to clarify 4. Ask upstream to include LGPL license in package and/or in source code itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:01:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245561] Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070801.m078106H025167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ht - File editor/viewer/analyzer for executables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245561 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 03:01 EST ------- Here is an updated version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/ht-2.0.10-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070805.m0785Jc9025993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 03:05 EST ------- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-0.2.3141svn.fc9.src.rpm This should do the trick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070807.m0787uSM026533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 03:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimmix Short Description: Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client Owners: awjb Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070814.m078Ep3S026755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-07 03:14 EST ------- 1- has to found out indeed 2- Yes since it runs the %{_bindir}/R CMD check %{packname} command, this check whether Biobase is present or not 3- corrected 4- corrected 5- They should since R-2.6.0 but they did not... and on BioC 2.2 it is not clearer (it is one of the biggest problem with bioconductor) New files SPEC http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest.spec SRPM http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-multtest/R-multtest-1.18.0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070829.m078T1MF028610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-07 03:29 EST ------- Thanks, on the assumption that we can fix in rawhide and that you pester upstream again on license issues, this package is: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 08:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 03:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070837.m078bBdP030266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 03:37 EST ------- This package does not follow compiler flags as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 ==> use make command in spec as make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 09:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:05:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801070905.m0795dL4002383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 04:05 EST ------- Changes made, same place for the spec and SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 10:27:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 05:27:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071027.m07ARiHr014966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 05:27 EST ------- Review for initial SRPM posted in comment 1)Not needed following in SPEC %define perl_vendorlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo $installvendorlib) %define perl_vendorarch %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorarch`"; echo $installvendorarch) 2) use simple way instead to use like this %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/XML/ %{perl_vendorlib}/XML/Element.pm %{perl_vendorlib}/XML/TreeBuilder.pm use following %{perl_vendorlib}/XML 3) License should be GPL+ or Artistic 4) use setup -q 5) remove META.yml, MANIFEST and MANIFEST.SKIP from %doc 6) make Group to Development/Libraries 7) missing BR and requires. Add following to SPEC BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Element) BuildRequires: perl(HTML::Tagset) BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) Requires: perl(HTML::Element) perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(XML::Parser) 8)%install should use following %{__make} pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Always keep habit of updating SPEC and SRPM links with updateing release tag and adding what changes you did in SPEC. Provide updated SPEC and SRPM links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 10:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 05:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071042.m07AgTcl017552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 05:42 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 8f4c6860aa627c5d0694b8bb5699fe7f libnova-0.12.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package libnova-0.12.1-1.fc9 -> Provides: libnova-0.12.so.1 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libnova-0.12.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libnova-devel-0.12.1-1.fc9 -> Requires: libnova = 0.12.1-1.fc9 libnova-0.12.so.1 + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. I have sponsored you. Follow CVSAdminProcedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 10:57:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 05:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071057.m07Avb8K019821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 05:57 EST ------- SRPM:http://www.geocities.com/fatema_mhs/jday-2.4-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] New: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: buytenh at wantstofly.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/fedora-packages/dropbear.spec SRPM URL: http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/fedora-packages/dropbear-0.50-1.src.rpm Description: Dropbear is a relatively small SSH 2 server and client. Dropbear is particularly useful for "embedded"-type Linux (or other Unix) systems, such as wireless routers. This is my first package. I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071106.m07B6KvD021609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 buytenh at wantstofly.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071118.m07BIV6r023114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071118.m07BIcAf023157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 06:18 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for RPM But NOT for RPM. jday.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) ==>cosmetic message. + source files match upstream url 817af56005d1346677271ed2fab63ef5 jday-2.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + jday.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package jday-2.4-1.fc9 -> Provides: libjday.so.2 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libjday.so.2 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package jday-devel-2.4-1.fc9 -> Requires: jday = 2.4-1.fc9 libjday.so.2 + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071148.m07BmgTN027403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 06:48 EST ------- jfearn, Can you make package name to docbook-build-tools? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 11:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071157.m07BvCv2028811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-07 06:57 EST ------- I'm not sure. This URL suggests GPLv2 : http://www.t2-project.org/packages/mono-basic.html, as does http://dsrg.mff.cuni.cz/projects/mono/diffs/showdiff.php?old=2005-11-05&new=2005-11-06&diffIndex=14&bench=. However, I've seen it also listed as LGPL. I'll see what upstream has to say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 12:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071201.m07C1NDX029437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 07:01 EST ------- ok, i working on all this points, i will add a comment on this thread after uploaded new files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 12:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 07:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071233.m07CX68Q001393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-07 07:33 EST ------- Here is the SRPM without the patches, as discussed sadly it doesn't build with the patches. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/gnome-themes-extras-2.20-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071306.m07D6aak007031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-07 08:06 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: drpython New Branches: FC-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071326.m07DQu4p009906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-07 08:26 EST ------- I think this should be now closed as "NEXTRELEASE". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:28:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251950] Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071328.m07DS0cl010060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodbar - Identifies the "mood" of your music files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251950 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071329.m07DTMbT010133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-01-07 08:29 EST ------- Hi Jason, Apologies for setting NEEDINFO flag. I didn't expect to have an opposite result. Fixed all of them, with a little flaw -- files listed trice warning during build. I'll contact upstream about the Arabic po file incorrect filename and the permission of file permission issues. http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packaging/emesene/emesene.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packaging/emesene/emesene-1.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Thank you very much. Best Regards, Caius. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071336.m07DaoE8011201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2008-01-07 08:36 EST ------- Yes, this bug can be closed. BTW: I am glad, that we still have esd and arts support in SDL. Esd support is currently needed because of problems with pulseaudio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 13:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071348.m07DmZb1012951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-07 08:48 EST ------- Upstream update: Spec URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kmplayer/kmplayer.spec SRPM URL: http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/SOURCES/kmplayer/kmplayer-0.10.0c-1.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=330742 (using x86_64 rpms): rpmlint kmplayer-*.rpm kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/ru/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/es/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkmplayercommon.so libkmplayercommon.so kmplayer.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkdeinit_kmplayer.so libkdeinit_kmplayer.so These are all expected/harmless wrt kde apps/packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:00:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071500.m07F0BOq023728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 10:00 EST ------- I writing new SPEC file with follow modify, if is ok for you i wait a comment to this thread to upload new files, thanks. CHANGED: > GPL is no longer a valid license tag. Changed to GPLv2 > Applications/AudioVideo is not one of the standard groups Changed to Audiovideo;AudioVideoEditing > your %descriptions lacks a subject for the phrase that is included in the > first paragraph. I also suggest to use "Using themonospot it is also possible > to modify FourCC informations " for the second paragraph. Inserted subject in the first paragraph and "Using Themonospot it is..." in second > the %distribution and %vendor tags should not be included in your spec deleted %distribution and %vendor > Please use rpm macros instead of absolute paths (i.e. replace "./configure > --prefix=/usr" with "%configure --prefix=%{_prefix}" or even better just with > %configure ) changed with %configure > the desktop file should be installed according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755, > not using ln;pixmaps should probably be included in %files changed in [%post] section from ln to mv -f so the files will be moved in right path. > the .pc file should probably not be included deleted .pc file from %files list > the version reported by the most recent entry in the changelog is not > identical to the one of the package (0.6.5 versus 0.6.5-1) modified changelog version to 0.6.5-2 (as release number) and adjust date (delete time in according to Packaging Guidelines) > And last but not least, you should provide access to the src.rpm. I will generate with ... rpmbuild -ba --sign themonospot-0.6.5.SPEC so i will upload also src.rpm file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071513.m07FDl0g025914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-07 10:13 EST ------- Well, this package is okay ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (pards) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------------- So would you contact with accounts at fedoraproject.org as written in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem/Contact about GPG key problem if you still have the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071520.m07FKoYM027160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-07 10:20 EST ------- Urm.. I quickly tried to use external libjingle but it seems rather difficult... So for now would you use internal libjingle and rewrite (reupload) the new srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:23:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071523.m07FNY55027524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 10:23 EST ------- Please verify your work using rpmlint before uploading the new version. And by the way there is nothing wrong in signing the src.rpm, but this is not required for packages that are submitted for review. As a recommendation, please try to use the exact capitalization of the name of the application, mixing "Themonospot" and "themonospot" (as you seem to plan to do in the %description tag ) is not really a good idea. The most preferred variant is all lowercase, unless there is a valid reason to use something else (for instance if upstream uses something different). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071532.m07FWtOp029299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:30:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071530.m07FU1md028907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 ------- Additional Comments From jeckersb at redhat.com 2008-01-07 10:30 EST ------- I have my Fedora account set up. I have pending requests for the cvsextras and fedorabugs groups, the folks on #fedora-devel seemed to think that's all I need. If not, let me know what you need to get this through. (The docs located at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored doesn't have any details) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:32:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:32:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071532.m07FWVQB029257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-07 10:32 EST ------- Reopening to reassign to myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071532.m07FWiLg029329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618 rpm at greysector.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071534.m07FYdHf029601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-07 10:34 EST ------- Taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:37:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226509] Merge Review: tzdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071537.m07FbYpR030163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tzdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226509 ------- Additional Comments From pmachata at redhat.com 2008-01-07 10:37 EST ------- Great, in that case I'm dropping the LGPL part of the License. All the files (both the java part and the zoneinfo part) are built from the same set of public domain sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:36:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071536.m07FaT68030058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 10:36 EST ------- > try to use the exact capitalization of the name of > the application, mixing "Themonospot" and "themonospot" set themonospot lower case also in %description i'm going to use rpmlint... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071541.m07FfRSN031076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226509, which changed state. Bug 226509 Summary: Merge Review: tzdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226509 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226509] Merge Review: tzdata In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071541.m07FfQVX031040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tzdata https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226509 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 10:41 EST ------- Let's call this done, then. Thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:37:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071537.m07FbsYA030365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-07 10:37 EST ------- SRPM from comment #10 works fine in koji now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=330931 The problem was that "R CMD INSTALL" was moved to R-devel in rawhide, so the BR: R-devel fixed it (which should always be present as per review guidelines in any case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:42:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071542.m07FgOXk031160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-07 10:42 EST ------- Well, * Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" commands to keep timestamps * Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc * What file indicates the license of this software? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:51:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426064] Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071551.m07Fp613000665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wipe - secure file erasing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426064 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-07 10:51 EST ------- xx - rpmlint is unclean on RPM and installed package [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ rpmlint /devel/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/wipe-0.20-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm wipe.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/wipe-0.20/wswap.pl wipe.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/wipe-0.20/wipefd0 wipe.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/wipe-0.20/wswap.pl /usr/bin/perl [rishi at ginger SPECS]$ Remove the executable bits from the example scripts in %doc. Here is a patch to fix this issues: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/wipe.spec.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 15:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071557.m07FvS3W001090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-07 10:57 EST ------- Only problems that I see: - Please put the full URL path to the Sources (where possible). - dropbear.src: W: strange-permission dropbear.init 0755 Should be easy enough to fix, just make sure the perms are -x on that file before making the SRPM. - dropbear.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dropbear-0.50/CHANGES Just add these lines in %setup: # convert to UTF-8 iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 -o CHANGES{.utf8,} mv CHANGES{.utf8,} - dropbear.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/dropbear dropbear.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/dropbear Do you intend for this service to be enabled by default? Also, since the init file is custom, please add the reload function. It can be as simple as calling "stop, start". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:06:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071606.m07G6wbe003469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-07 11:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Your spec should require guile and loudmouth, and probably libidn, glib, > readline, ncurses, and libstdc++. They all seem to be taken care of, already: [rishi at ginger ~]$ rpm --requires -q freetalk /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh /sbin/install-info /sbin/install-info libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libguile.so.17()(64bit) libidn.so.11()(64bit) libloudmouth-1.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libncurses.so.5()(64bit) libreadline.so.5()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [rishi at ginger ~]$ rpm -q freetalk freetalk-3.0-1.fc8 [rishi at ginger ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:05:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071605.m07G5sTa003097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-07 11:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Yes, this bug can be closed. > No it can't I just checked SDL.spec in devel CVS and the following items from the review still hold true: Must Fix ======== * From rpmlint: * Drop the . at the end of the -devel package summary * Drop "rm -rf %{buildroot}" from %prep (already done at the begin of %install) * change %build in %changelog to %%build * Drop the static library from -devel * Add "Requires: pkgcconfig" to -devel subpackage for proper ownership of the /usr/%{_lib}/pkgconfig directory * Add "Requires: automake" to -devel subpackage for proper ownership of the /usr/share/aclocal directory Should Fix ========== * remove this line: "CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" \", this is Superfluous, as %configure already does this itself * remove "README-SDL.txt COPYING CREDITS BUGS" from %files devel's %doc, they are already included in the main %doc, which is required by -devel Or basicly, you didn't fix a _single_ thing from my review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426535] Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071612.m07GCUhf004242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freetalk - A console based Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426535 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-07 11:12 EST ------- Hmm, yeah, for some reason that didn't seem to happen on my machine the first time I looked, but I just rebuilt and it does now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225753] Merge Review: findutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071627.m07GRC8V006588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: findutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225753 vcrhonek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071627.m07GRD6a006616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 225753, which changed state. Bug 225753 Summary: Merge Review: findutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225753 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071625.m07GPAhM006398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 jeckersb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jeckersb at redhat.com 2008-01-07 11:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PyYAML Short Description: YAML is a data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages. PyYAML is a YAML parser and emitter for Python. Owners: jeckersb Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 16:32:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427508] Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071632.m07GWDqV007468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hi - Hindi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427508 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 11:32 EST ------- ok. Done. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 17:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071711.m07HBMD9015178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-01-07 12:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > ping? pong, I was on vacation (In reply to comment #18) > Must Fix > -------- > * Add BuildRequires: freealut-devel libXxf86vm-devel libXxf86dga-devel > * "Encoding=UTF-8" in the .desktop file is deprecated please remove it > * rpmlint: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ufoai-2.1.1/CONTRIBUTORS all done I've also added a fix for rpmlint complaints about: ufoai.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/ufoai/base/i18n/cs/LC_MESSAGES/ufoai.mo ... Spec URL: http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/ufoai/ufoai.spec.2.1.1-3 SRPM URL: http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/ufoai/ufoai-2.1.1-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 17:25:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071725.m07HPWB2017447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 12:25 EST ------- I'll go ahead and take this since nobody else has claimed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 17:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:24:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425956] Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071724.m07HOcWk017098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-01-07 12:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > ping? pong, I was on vacation (In reply to comment #2) > Full review done: > Must Fix: > --------- > * Include an empty %build section, not having a build section can cause > problems in certain cases (or so I have been told) it is there, didn't you look at the old revision? - please check: http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/ufoai/ufoai-data.spec.2.1.1-2 > * Not all content is licensed under the GPL, I'm afraid this means that ufoai > atm cannot be included in Fedora, see: I guess we have to wait (until the next release) ... let's turn to livna (rpmfusion) meanwhile > Should Fix: > ----------- > * Passing "-n %{name}-%{version}" to %setup is redundant. somehow it did not work for me without it, now it works ... I made a new spec revision, but I won't repack the data (srpm) for now; see http://www.hajnet.cz/soubory/ufoai/ufoai-data.spec.2.1.1-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 17:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071731.m07HV5G7018373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-01-07 12:31 EST ------- Thanks Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts Short Description: Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts Owners: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Branches: F-7, F-8, devel InitialCC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 17:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 12:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071740.m07HeJj4019884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071802.m07I2PPW023292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(danms at us.ibm.com) | ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-07 13:02 EST ------- - Removed extra_release - Source URL will be updated when the upstream release is made - Removed explicit Requires - Commented %pre. Following convention here. - Changed to cond-restart - chrpath reports no rpath set on my .so's. CIM providers *are* .so files and must remain as such. See sblim-cmpi-base (et al) for other examples. These are not development libraries, they are plugin-type libraries. SPEC: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim.spec SRPM: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim-0.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:07:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071807.m07I7N7I024355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-07 13:07 EST ------- there is no CVS request here. please follow the directions at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:04:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:04:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071804.m07I4WFP024197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-07 13:04 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071809.m07I95Lo025149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-07 13:09 EST ------- you cvs request must use fas account names not email addresses as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure please correct and rerequest -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071808.m07I80Xu024513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2008-01-07 13:07 EST ------- Oups, I am sorry - I misread your comment from above. Fixed version will be in rawhide in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:17:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:17:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071817.m07IHhvF026750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-07 13:17 EST ------- I have addressed all the issues. Inclusion of this package is important to my management so I was wondering if you could get back to me with all of the spec file changes in one comment because I need to provide an estimate to my team lead for how much work I will need to put it. Thanks for your comments. The new SPEC file and SRPM are here: SPEC: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/libvpd.spec SRPM: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/linux-diag/libvpd-1.5.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071819.m07IJve2026145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-07 13:19 EST ------- I've send a mail to accounts at fedoraproject.org, and recived mail from Mike McGrath . But it has not solved yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427824] New: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427824 Summary: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko.spec SRPM URL: http://vpv.fedorapeople.org/packages/tmispell-voikko-0.6.3-0.1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Tmispell is an Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules. To do the actual spell-checking for Finnish language it uses the spell-checking system Voikko. I've left some comments and some commented-out parts into the SPEC file. They will hopefully help KDE (etc.) integration later on, if someone modifies /usr/bin/ispell to call tmispell when needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427218] Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071823.m07INrk3027726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: drpython - a python IDE channel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427218 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-07 13:23 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071820.m07IK4fi027287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-07 13:20 EST ------- short description is too long ive used "YAML parser and emitter for Python" CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071827.m07IRCM8027695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-07 13:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-basic Short Description: VB.NET support for mono Owners: pfj Branches: FC7, FC8 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:26:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071826.m07IQfMD027644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-07 13:26 EST ------- Okay, I just checked SDL.spec in CVS again, much better now, thanks! Closing. I see that you've also updated to upstream 1.2.13, good! And that by doing that you've fixed bug 310841 and bug 426475. And for good measure you've also fixed bug 426579, good work! Shouldn't those be closed then too? Shall I or will you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071842.m07IgHve030185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 ------- Additional Comments From twoerner at redhat.com 2008-01-07 13:42 EST ------- These are bugs for F-8. The F-8 update package will make it into testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:44:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226402] Merge Review: SDL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071844.m07IiYHi030374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226402 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-07 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > These are bugs for F-8. The F-8 update package will make it into testing. Ah right, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071846.m07IkfgR031877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net 2008-01-07 13:46 EST ------- FYI: there's a patch to add libdc1394-2 support to ffmpeg floating around ffmpeg-devel with good chances to be accepted. What applications still don't support libdc1394-2? Maybe we could get this into livna/rpmfusion first while we wait for the legal review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 18:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071856.m07IuM6T001060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-07 13:56 EST ------- Thanks for the quick turn. Building on x86_64, I do see RPATHs being used. $ find . -name \*.so | xargs -n 1 chrpath -l | grep RPATH ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_HostedDependency.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_AllocationCapabilities.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_VSMigrationService.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_VirtualSystemManagementService.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ComputerSystemIndication.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ElementCapabilities.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ResourcePoolConfigurationService.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_SettingsDefineState.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ElementConformsToProfile.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_VSSDComponent.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_SystemDevice.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_HostedService.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_HostedResourcePool.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_VirtualSystemManagementCapabilities.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_SettingsDefineCapabilities.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ElementAllocatedFromPool.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ResourceAllocationFromPool.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi ./usr/lib64/cmpi/libVirt_ElementSettingData.so: RPATH=/usr/lib64/cmpi other trivial things: rpmlint warning: libvirt-cim.x86_64: W: percent-in-%pre. This comes from %pre's comment header mentioning %post. Just drop the %. Be sure spec file permissions are 644 when you cvs checkin to get rid of the other rpmlint warning. A comment about .so files being plugins would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425956] Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071921.m07JLMuV004818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071919.m07JJiIZ004867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 Bug 412001 depends on bug 425956, which changed state. Bug 425956 Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425957] Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071921.m07JLGj4005564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-music - UFO: Alien Invasion additional music https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425957 Bug 425957 depends on bug 412001, which changed state. Bug 412001 Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071921.m07JLFTF005536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-07 14:21 EST ------- As discussed in bug 425956, the needed data unfortunately is not properly licensed for Fedora atm. Thus I'm also closing this review as the guidelines do not allow for a "useless" package to be packaged, basicly the rule is that if a package needs some content to function and is completely not functional without that content it cannot be part of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:19:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425956] Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071919.m07JJhBF004842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-07 14:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I guess we have to wait (until the next release) ... let's turn to livna > (rpmfusion) meanwhile > Okay, closing this as a dead review then, feel free to reopen or file a new one once the license issues are fixed. I'll also be closing the review for the engine as the guidelines do not allow for a "useless" package to be packaged, basicly the rule is that if a package needs some content to function and is completely not functional without that content it cannot be part of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 19:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801071937.m07Jbbep007761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson at redhat.com 2008-01-07 14:37 EST ------- Also note that libdc1394 2.0.0 was officially released a few days ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 20:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072006.m07K6DUY013676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 20:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:34:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072034.m07KYiaD017789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-07 15:34 EST ------- I'm running rpmlint in my box and did not see the standard User/Group stuff. I'm basically running `rpmlint firstaidkit.srpm firstaidkit.rpm and firstaidkit (when installed)`. what am I missing? I fixed the issue anyway. Regarding comment 1. I have created a ticket for the trac in fedorahosted. Regarding the /usr/libexec/firstaidkit/plugins. Don't know what to do here. The idea is to have firsaidkit-PLUGINNAME packages install into a given directory that firstaidkit knows about. I saw the way yum did it but the yum.spec file did not use macros. instead it defined "/usr/lib/" and put the "yum-plugins" directory in there. If I do that in firstaidkit, rpmlint screams. I try to use bindir but it uses "/usr/lib64" in 64 bit archs. Yum also screams in this case because it says that there are non binary files in /usr/lib64. I would really prefer to have it in /usr/lib, but don't know what macro to use. What macro to use to install the files in /usr/lib ? With all this discussion (REALLY GOOD BTW!!!!) I realized that the firstaidkit packaging stuff would need a little change to be more .... logical :). The idea is to add a dummy package that brings all the other firstaidkit packages in. The plugin system will be in a package called firstaidkit-pluginsystem and the dummy package would be called firstaidkit. The main idea is for the user to do a yum install firstaidkit and get all the default plugin packages. And for the plugin developer to just install the firstaidkit-devel and get the firstaidkit-pluginsystem with the examples, and develop with that. I'll but up all the material and post it on fedorapeople. FYI rpmlint will scream because of the /usr/lib64 stuff. Please advise. Links : srpm : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm spec : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 20:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072042.m07KgI3K018756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 15:42 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: x86_64 local + all arch supported by koji scratch build [x] Rpmlint output: source rpm: E: unknown-key GPG#ff6382fa (ignorable) binary rpm: kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/ru/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/et/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/it/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/es/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/fr/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/da/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/nl/kmplayer/common ../common kmplayer.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkdeinit_kmplayer.so libkdeinit_kmplayer.so kmplayer.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkmplayercommon.so libkmplayercommon.so KDE specific, ignorable [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: in %tag: GPLv2+ source files' licenses: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 52bfa017e1360fdc60c10445090c867039da4830 kmplayer-0.10.0c.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: ppc/ppc64/x86/x86_64 (koji scratch build) [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. The license tag and the licenses from the source files do not coincid. Some of the licenses used by the source files are GPLv2+ but others are LGPLv2+ (see kmplayer_def.h, kmplayer_koffice_part*, viewarea.cpp, xineplayer.h and maybe others ). Because of this I think that the correct license tag should be " GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+". If I am wrong, please correct me. 2. The desktop file (kmplayer.desktop) has a small error. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-254ddf07aae20a23ced8cecc219d8f73926e9755 the icon tag can be specified either as a full path to specific icon file or a short name without file extension. You have used a short name WITH extension 3. Minor: there is a duplicate BR:cairo-devel (by gtk2-devel) I'll trust you to fix these issues before uploading to CVS. === Final Notes === 1. The package does contain .la files but they are needed for runtime (KDE specific requirement). 2. I had not yet the opportunity to test the program and I cannot do it now. I will do it in a couple of hours and come back with the final of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 20:46:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 179988] Review Request: freealut - Implementation of OpenAL's ALUT standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072046.m07KkqSd019898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freealut - Implementation of OpenAL's ALUT standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179988 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list at redhat.com |review at redhat.com Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 15:46 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: freealut New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 20:48:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 15:48:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072048.m07KmV3q020145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-07 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > * What file indicates the license of this software? /usr/share/doc/dbxml-perl-2.003/README says: "Copyright (c) 2003-5 Paul Marquess. All rights reserved. This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." I'm not quite sure whether that's sufficient, but that's the only place where the source package actually makes some statement about the licensing :-) Source rpm + spec file: * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml-perl/dbxml-perl-2.003-1.fc8.src.rpm * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/dbxml-perl/dbxml-perl.spec dist-f9 scratch build: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=331937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072100.m07L0ntq022343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 16:00 EST ------- To tell the truth, I was not thinking about relicensing the files (because they are compatible with GPL) but of the tag to be used in the spec. I am not sure which one is correct: "GPLv2+ and zlib" or simply "GPLv2+" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072100.m07L0Jup022284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-07 16:00 EST ------- vlc still isn't compatible with libdc1394-2 I will try to see if this can be patched... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072101.m07L1S9D022528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 16:01 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:01:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072101.m07L1wU4022616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 16:01 EST ------- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072127.m07LRAw1026558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 16:27 EST ------- As discussed on IRC, there's no upstream for this package. So the various rpmlint complaints like: libuser.x86_64: W: no-url-tag are OK. Following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL this needs a comment in the spec, which I'll commit shortly. This shows up when you run rpmlint on the installed package: libuser.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libuser.so.1.1.10 /lib64/libdl.so.2 I don't think it's a big issue but perhaps you know what causes it. It just looks like libuser.so is linked against libdl.so but doesn't actually call any symbols from it. I've seen the "WITH_SELINUX" stuff in other formerly core packages and I have to say I'm not quite sure what utility it has these days where everything is always built with selinux support. I think the bit at the end of %install really should be in a %check section instead, but that's not the kind of change I want to commit without consulting you. This file in the -devel package looks a bit odd: /usr/include/libuser/default.-c Any idea if that's a typo? Checklist: * No upstream source to compare against. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libuser-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm config(libuser) = 0.56.6-4 libuser.so.1()(64bit) libuser_files.so()(64bit) libuser_ldap.so()(64bit) libuser_shadow.so()(64bit) libuser = 0.56.6-4 = /sbin/ldconfig config(libuser) = 0.56.6-4 libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libldap-2.4.so.2()(64bit) libpam.so.0()(64bit) libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit) libpam_misc.so.0()(64bit) libpam_misc.so.0(LIBPAM_MISC_1.0)(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0(LIBPOPT_0)(64bit) libselinux.so.1()(64bit) libuser.so.1()(64bit) libuser-devel-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm libuser-devel = 0.56.6-4 = glib2-devel libuser = 0.56.6-4 libuser.so.1()(64bit) libuser-python-0.56.6-4.x86_64.rpm libusermodule.so()(64bit) libuser-python = 0.56.6-4 = libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpam.so.0()(64bit) libpam.so.0(LIBPAM_1.0)(64bit) libpam_misc.so.0()(64bit) libpam_misc.so.0(LIBPAM_MISC_1.0)(64bit) libselinux.so.1()(64bit) libuser = 0.56.6-4 libuser.so.1()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.5 * ldconfig called properly * unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets look OK (ldconfig) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package and are in a subdirectory to avoid conflicts. * pkgconfig file is in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426103] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072129.m07LTWtp026759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:35:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072135.m07LZCnS028011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-01-07 16:35 EST ------- Drat, out of date again New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts Short Description: Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts Owners: nim Branches: F-7, F-8, devel InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394871] Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072137.m07Lb8fp028216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: automaton - a Java finite state automata/regular expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394871 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-01-07 16:37 EST ------- I don't know what upstream will do with the version. Thank you for the suggestion. I am going to take it. Here are the new URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/automaton/automaton-1.10r3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072137.m07LbLKu028136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-01-07 16:37 EST ------- Just FYI: license is not GPLv2+, as the copyright headers in the code do not say "or later". Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:38:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:38:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072138.m07LcUa9028227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 wjhns174 at hardakers.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From wjhns174 at hardakers.net 2008-01-07 16:38 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: geoqo Short Description: Geocaching and General Geographical Waypoint Database Owners: hardaker Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252115] Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072152.m07Lq7KS030284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jfreechart - Charts Generation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252115 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-01-07 16:52 EST ------- I'm still willing to review. I'm also willing to help with getting the latest version (now 1.0.9) packaged up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 21:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252114] Review Request: jcommon - Common library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072150.m07LoT67030094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jcommon - Common library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252114 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From loganjerry at gmail.com 2008-01-07 16:50 EST ------- Vivek, I have now done a couple of reviews and I'm still willing to review jcommon and jfreechart. I have a use for both packages myself, so I would really like to seem them in Fedora. Version 1.0.12 is now available. Can you get to it, or would you like some help getting the latest version packaged? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072205.m07M5AFG032630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-07 17:05 EST ------- Simply GPLv2+ if the files are linked together. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072221.m07MLpG6002502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 17:21 EST ------- Package Review for boxes-1.1-3 ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: none [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: %tag GPLv2; correct tag: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 1fd6e875e9b3c84f2a71f6df73d9eddb37d11c93 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:Devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:devel/x86_64 and i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1. the correct license tag is GPLv2+ instead of GPLv2 ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ Please fix the license tag before uploading to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072223.m07MNA7a003014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 17:23 EST ------- Thanks Thomas for pre-review and Patrice and Mamoru for license guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:22:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072222.m07MMJV1002929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 17:22 EST ------- when i try to rpmbuild with SPEC file without .pc file from %files list, i had an error at the end of script. So i tryed to lunch rpmlint on an rpm generated within .pc file and this is result: themonospot.i386: W: no-documentation themonospot.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pkgconfig/themonospot-base.pc themonospot.i386: E: no-binary themonospot.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib themonospot.i386: E: unknown-key GPG#c8fa4777 themonospot.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv themonospot.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%postun rm i could think not so bad :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:36:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250909] Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072236.m07Mav9U004916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gkrellm-timestamp - UNIX timestamp clock plugin for GKrellM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250909 ------- Additional Comments From nikolay at vladimiroff.com 2008-01-07 17:36 EST ------- Sorry, about the delay. I completely forgot about this. I'll make the necessary changes tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072235.m07MZm7A004823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-07 17:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072233.m07MX48a004203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-07 17:33 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tiresias-fonts Short Description: Low-vision fonts Owners: spot Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:37:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072237.m07Mbw8B005058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 17:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > jfearn, > Can you make package name to docbook-build-tools? This system is being used in production systems within Red Hat and has been for some time. It would take a very well presented argument to get me to consider renaming this package. Cheers, Jeff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072245.m07MjnLx006428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-07 17:45 EST ------- What kind of argument? It is much too generic. The package name space has to be shared by all the packages and there are a lot of packages that could have that name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427033] Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072245.m07MjkTu006470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimmix - Graphical music player daemon (MPD) client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427033 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 17:45 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 22:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072249.m07MnAXa006704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-01-07 17:49 EST ------- We are using libdc1394-2 now for quite a while now internally and I'm maintaining RPMs thereof (based initially on atrpms packages). I have put builds with the official 2.0.0 release to http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/libdc1394. They replace the old version though. We use them on robots where we don't care about other media software that depends on version 1 libs. Just if you want to use it until legal questions have been answered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:07:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072307.m07N712S009884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-07 18:07 EST ------- Small fix to start the service later in the init cycle. Also the right fix for non default starting. http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-0.3.3141svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:08:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072308.m07N8MKp009944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-07 18:08 EST ------- Hmm, RPATH is only on some of them. How weird. I added the code to "fix" libtool, and now they're gone. Fixed the comment issue (that was dumb of me). For reference, the fixed version: SRPM: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim-0.1-3.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://static.danplanet.com/pkg/fedora-9/libvirt-cim.spec Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072309.m07N9Iaq010061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From danms at us.ibm.com 2008-01-07 18:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libvirt-cim Short Description: A CIM provider for libvirt Owners: danms Branches: F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: No -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072309.m07N9eWW010231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 18:09 EST ------- modifing my makefile.in i obtain from rpmlint: themonospot.i386: W: no-documentation themonospot.i386: E: no-binary themonospot.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib themonospot.i386: E: unknown-key GPG#c8fa4777 themonospot.i386: W: empty-%post themonospot.i386: W: empty-%postun now i think it's ok ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072318.m07NIUo3011357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhideo at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-07 18:18 EST ------- Jeff/Patrice, Any way to tell if anyone else is using that name? - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072320.m07NK0V0012043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-07 18:19 EST ------- great, thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:24:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072324.m07NO05M012107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-07 18:23 EST ------- waiting, i uploaded this file: http://themonospot.googlecode.com/files/themonospot-0.6.5.SPEC http://themonospot.googlecode.com/files/themonospot-0.6.5-2.i386.rpm http://themonospot.googlecode.com/files/themonospot-0.6.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072328.m07NSYLj012803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-07 18:28 EST ------- No way. But it isn't a reason to begin to use too generic names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:44:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072344.m07NiLoW014977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-07 18:44 EST ------- WRT your suggested method to recreate the tarball: I see no real need to include the .svn folder. You need to add libtool as a BR, otherwise mock build fails. running rpmlint over your src.rpm gives: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpmlint xsel-0.9.6-1.svn20071212.fc8.src.rpm xsel.src:36: E: configure-without-libdir-spec xsel.src:37: E: configure-without-libdir-spec xsel.src: W: non-standard-group Miscellaneous command line tools In this case we can probably ignore the first two (I'll check tomorrow if this is true) but the last one should be fixed by picking a proper group. I'll try to do tomorrow a more thorough verification -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 7 23:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 18:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801072351.m07NpsHT016942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 ------- Additional Comments From stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de 2008-01-07 18:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291027) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291027&action=view) Patch to allow building with FORTIFY_SOURCE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 00:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421921] Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080005.m08055ZG018604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: argyllcms - ICC compatible color management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421921 stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug| |http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Tracker URL| |show_bug.cgi?id=34710 ------- Additional Comments From stefan.bruens at rwth-aachen.de 2008-01-07 19:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Many thanks for the patches. As I wrote in my mail, there are probably several > such problems in upstream's codebase, since it has not been widely built > (Mandriva hid them by disabling FORTIFY_SOURCE), and I'm probably not the best > qualified to fix them. I have created a patch to allow using FORTIFY_SOURCE. According to gcc bug 34710, printf may be a macro, so usage of printf as a function name is risky at least. I have changed the fn name to icc_fprintf(), this fixes the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 00:09:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080009.m0809cj2019081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From foolish at guezz.net 2008-01-07 19:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: httptunnel Short Description: Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests Owners: foolish at guezz.net Branches: F-7, F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 00:33:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080033.m080X3to023455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-01-07 19:33 EST ------- Interesting. It builds on my mock without libtool but I am on x86_64 (shouldn't make a difference) there is a new version of mock out today for me to try out also. It doesn't seem to hurt to add libtool so I'll go ahead and add that. I went ahead and changed the group to "User Interface/X" which is where other useful tools are, such as xrandr. The author has said version 0.9.7 will be out soon but until then svn should work fine. SVN updated to 20080107 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 00:43:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 19:43:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080043.m080hxOR024984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-07 19:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-multtest Short Description: Multiple hypothesis testing library from Bioconductor Owners: pingou, alexlan Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: alexlan Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:21:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080121.m081LRKC030679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:21 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-ParseLex.spec http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-ParseLex-2.15-7.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080121.m081LnMs030539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:21 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.10-3.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:43:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080143.m081hdl9001033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:43 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-ParseLex-2.15-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080143.m081hM0C000983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:43 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.10-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080147.m081lLXc002022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:47 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jday Short Description: A Simple command to convert calendar dates to Julian dates Owners: huzaifas Branches: F-8 InitialCC: huzaifsa Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 01:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080149.m081nmK3001444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 20:49 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnova Short Description: Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library Owners: huzaifas Branches: F-8 InitialCC: huzaifas Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 02:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427824] Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080232.m082W1EM010884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tmispell-voikko - An Ispell compatible front-end for spell-checking modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427824 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-07 21:32 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291031) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291031&action=view) Patch to support Voikko (tmispell) in legacy KSpell Here's a patch to add support for Voikko to kdelibs3 (legacy KSpell interface). This patch applies on top of my kspell-hunspell patch (as they touch the same pieces of code). KDE 4 doesn't need patching because it uses Enchant. The KSpell2 interface in kdelibs3 should be handled by the kspell2-enchant patch already. I can apply this patch to our kdelibs3 if you think it's the best solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 02:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 179988] Review Request: freealut - Implementation of OpenAL's ALUT standard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080259.m082xjgM032493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: freealut - Implementation of OpenAL's ALUT standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179988 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 21:59 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:02:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080302.m0832fOl015325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:02 EST ------- Please use fedora account system names instead of email addresses. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080307.m0837ll4016136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 22:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Just FYI: license is not GPLv2+, as the copyright headers in the code do not > say "or later". > > Thanks for the review! > Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:07:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080307.m0837HiT016089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:11:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:11:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426350] Review Request: mono-basic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080311.m083BY1J002354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-basic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426350 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:11 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:15:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080315.m083Ferq003218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:15 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080318.m083ITnA017763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 22:18 EST ------- Again, Please provide updated SPEC and SRPM links fixing above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080317.m083HuLl017705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 22:17 EST ------- 1)Any reason for not following point 7 from comment #5? build.log from mock build showed me Warning: prerequisite HTML::Element 3.08 not found. Warning: prerequisite HTML::Tagset 3.02 not found. Warning: prerequisite XML::Parser 0 not found. 2)Wrong group Development/Languages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080318.m083IGiH003548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:18 EST ------- cvs done. Any reason to now allow cvsextras commits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080321.m083LV8J004252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:21 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason to not allow cvsextras commits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080326.m083QAll005159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 22:26 EST ------- No, Sorry i copy pasted this from somewhere else and this is an oversight Can you do this please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:26:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:26:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080326.m083Q8hk005124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-07 22:26 EST ------- No, Sorry i copy pasted this from somewhere else and this is an oversight Can you do this please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080328.m083SkNk019499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-07 22:28 EST ------- with updated SRPM I got rpmlint to say odccm.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/odccm.conf A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here odccm.i386: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/odccm The package contains an init script but doesn't contain a %post with a call to chkconfig. odccm.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/odccm The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080327.m083ReRN005302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:27 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason to disallow cvsextras commits? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080328.m083S2fw005344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug| |http://bugzilla.gnome.org/sh Tracker URL| |ow_bug.cgi?id=496096 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-07 22:28 EST ------- Here's the upstream license clarification request bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496096 It looks like we are go tentatively for GPLv2, but I'd like to like to check whether they mean GPLv2+ (i.e. or later version), which is the most likely. Judging from some of the comments it seems that upstream doesn't really understand the meaning of GPL versions very well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080337.m083bPx3007168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:37 EST ------- cvsextras added. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080337.m083b8nX007113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:37 EST ------- cvsextras added. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080334.m083YGMQ006419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-07 22:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 03:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080341.m083f0Jt021557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-07 22:40 EST ------- http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder-3.10-4.fc9.src.rpm http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/perl-XML-TreeBuilder.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 04:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080442.m084gPKM016665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-07 23:42 EST ------- This does build but I get a huge number of errors building the documentation: pdfTeX warning: pdflatex (file /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map): ambiguous entry for `ebbx10': font file present but not included, will be treated as font file not present and so on. The resulting document is obviously not correct; compare http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/qvalue.pdf to http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.1/bioc/vignettes/qvalue/inst/doc/qvalue.pdf I'm really not sure what the problem is, or what to do with this review. Is that problem significant enough to block this package? This is really the only thing I see that's problematic, but if it's a texlive problem and not a problem with this package then I'm inclined to approve it, as texlive is breaking other things in various ways. What do you think? I think we've established in the past that they mean LGPLv2+ for the license, and that upstream is never going to pull their heads out and make even the simplest of clarifications to the licensing information in their packages or on their web pages. So I'm not even going to complain about it. * source files match upstream: 90012885da8bc630e146a569da0d46549af6d230a9f852074b2e0f713b1e99e6 qvalue_1.12.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint has only the two expected complaints for R packages. * final provides and requires are sane: R-qvalue = 1.12.0-1.fc9 = /bin/sh R * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 05:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080512.m085CqUD020433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|201449 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-08 00:12 EST ------- This fails to build for me: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/info/dir The usual way to deal with this is to remove $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_infodir}/dir at the end of %install. install-info will properly manage the info catalog in your scriptlets. After doing that, I can build and check this; rpmlint has some complaints: unuran.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 1) Not a big deal; fix it if you like. unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unuran_urng_prng.h unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unuran_urng_rngstreams.h unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unuran.h unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/unuran_urng_gsl.h These must go in a -devel package. unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libunuran.so The unversioned .so file must be in a -devel package. The pdf documentation should probably be in the -devel package as well, since it's not of much use at runtime and it's half the size of the package. Fortunately the include files have sufficiently distinct names that they don't need to be relocated to a subdirectory of %{_includedir}. It really looks to me like the license is GPLv2+, not just GPLv2; running grep -r -B1 'any later version' . in the unpacked source directory shows plenty of hits. The scriptlets need a couple of tweaks. First, you need to do install-info in %preun, not %postun, and you need to conditionalize it for uninstalls only: %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/unuran.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir || : fi %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig And unfortunately rpm doesn't generate dependencies for multi-line scriptlets, so you will need some dependencies: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig, /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info Otherwise I think things look OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 06:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080600.m0860LAF026703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 rainwoodman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: -|Review Request: - | | ------- Additional Comments From rainwoodman at gmail.com 2008-01-08 01:00 EST ------- This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 05:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rainwoodman at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gtk2-aqd-svn221.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gtk2-aqd-0.3.221.2.12.3-3.fc8.src.rpm Description: patched gtk2 version to allow global menu for gnome applications Project host: http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/ Related package: gnome2-globalmenu-applet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 06:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:06:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080606.m08666w5009240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 rainwoodman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427955 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 06:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080606.m08665uN009215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 rainwoodman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427954 Summary|Review Request: - - |gtk2-aqd> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 06:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rainwoodman at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gnome2-globalmenu-applet-0.3.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gnome2-globalmenu-applet-0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: A panel applet, if the user has installed gtk2-aqd, the menubar of current activated window will be shown in the applet instead of the window; the menubar of unactivated window will disappear. This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 07:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:21:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080721.m087LtPn005678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-08 02:21 EST ------- ok I think I have fixed it. I do not like the idea that the documentation is not working properly... Spec URL: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-qvalue/R-qvalue.spec SRPM URL: http://pingoured.fr/public/RPM/R-qvalue/R-qvalue-1.12.0-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 07:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421231] Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080744.m087ixb4022233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421231 kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-08 02:44 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-l10n Short Description: Internationalization support for KDE Owners: than,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 07:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080754.m087s2HN023443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-08 02:54 EST ------- Sorry my bad. Here is a version which finally fixes all the init stuff. Regarding the dbus file: As with other packages the dbus config files should not be marked noreplace... so this warning from rpmlint can be ignored. http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-0.4.3141svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 08:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080810.m088A9LB012725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 08:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257781] Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080853.m088rEWU019607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cnvgrib - GRIB1 <--> GRIB2 conversion utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257781 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 08:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080853.m088rCTT019545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |373861 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 03:53 EST ------- I'd like to have rpm macros accepted before proceeding, be it only to have consistent names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 08:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 257701] Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080854.m088sb4c032403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: w3lib - GRIB1 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257701 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 03:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Unfortunately what I'm not understanding now is why the debuginfo package comes > up empty. I guess it is Bug 209316? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 09:01:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226671] Merge Review: zlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080901.m08917uh001328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: zlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226671 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 04:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #25) > Is anyone actually reviewing this? fedora-review is set to '?' but I dont' see > anyone assigned to the package. I'm happy to review this if nobody else is > doing so. I did some comments, but I disagree to much on the use of autotools without upstream consent. Especially when this is not really necessary and the tests aren't run anymore. > I don't have any particular opinion on the minizip executables. I don't see why > it would be mandatory to ship them if the maintainer doesn't want to, however. > They're just source in the contrib directory of upstream's tarball, and it's not > really common for that kind of thing to be shipped as part of our packages > unless the maintainer feels some need to include it. I don't think it is mandatory, but I haven't seen a good reason not to ship them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 09:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:36:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080936.m089aSUD007884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 04:36 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package functions as described. === APPROVED === but please do not forget about the first two issues mentioned in comment #2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 09:41:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425956] Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080941.m089fvRr008813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai-data - UFO: Alien Invasion data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425956 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-01-08 04:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Okay, closing this as a dead review then, feel free to reopen or file a new one > once the license issues are fixed. ok, we'll see ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 09:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 04:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801080946.m089kEe9009616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-08 04:46 EST ------- I saw the posts I appreciate your input on this. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/gnome-themes-extras.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/gnome-themes-extras-2.20-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 10:41:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 05:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081041.m08AfMF9005231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 05:41 EST ------- - recommended fix: unless there is a very good reason, the spec file name should be identical to the name of the package (without the version) (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-625ebbc8678382beca8d0b02504d30e7b6f23791) and the suffix must be lowercase (mock does not identify the file to be used as spec as you can see here: ERROR: Exception(/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-2.src.rpm) Config(fedora-development-x86_64) 0 minutes 36 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-x86_64/result ERROR: No Spec file found in srpm: themonospot-0.6.5-2.src.rpm - MUSTFIX: sha1sum of the included tarball does not coincide with upstream - MUSTFIX: there is a typo in %install, the buildroot is cleaned with _rm_ -fR not with _rpm_ - (minor) please change "Using themonospot it is also possible modify " to "Using themonospot it is also possible to modify" - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 10:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 05:40:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081040.m08AewSW018939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 05:40 EST ------- I am building on x86_64, too, using [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ repoquery --envra mock 0:mock-0.8.19-1.fc7.x86_64 Could you please provide the links for the new src.rpm/spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 10:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 05:50:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081050.m08Ao4h5020263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 05:50 EST ------- log for the failed build: checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for pkg-config... no configure: error: You need to install pkg-config error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5623 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:11:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081111.m08BBt2r009746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |gtk2-aqd ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 06:11 EST ------- Don't you need a sponsor? If you do, please add bug 177841 as blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081112.m08BCcED023644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 06:12 EST ------- on my fedora i installed src.rmp + spec file correctly, but i have already pkg-config, i have mono 1.2.6 and monodevelop 0.18 installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081110.m08BATXa023431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: -|Review Request: gtk2-aqd - | |Global Menu Patch for GTK ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 06:10 EST ------- Don't you need a sponsor ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081127.m08BRQvC011652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-08 06:27 EST ------- Just a couple of thoughts: 1. You need to follow Source URL (macro using) as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz check more on it http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 2. Usage of make should be as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8b14098227aebff1cf6188939e9d0877295ac448 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:24:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:24:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081124.m08BOEDM011036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 06:24 EST ------- Even more missing BR: - mono-core - gtk-sharp2-devel With these packages added, compilation is successful but the %files section does not match what is build: Processing files: themonospot-0.6.5-3 error: File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/English.lf error: File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf Processing files: themonospot-debuginfo-0.6.5-3 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/English.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/themonospot-base.dll Note that your package MUST be able to be built in mock. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-351b11771f3898e032fcd70896ff21b8b82505c7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:25:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081125.m08BPbSE025472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-01-08 06:25 EST ------- This is nothing but devel. If the headers, objects and pdf are moved to a devel package, that leaves really nothing. Are you sure that's a good idea? Here's the result of that suggestion: rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/unuran-1.1.0-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0 /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/COPYING /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/KNOWN-PROBLEMS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/NEWS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/README /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/THANKS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/UPGRADE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 11:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 06:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081146.m08BkIHW014292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2008-01-08 06:46 EST ------- Konrad, Sorry for the late answer! (In reply to comment #54) > Per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: > > 1). > Please release upstream the newer version (0.14-2) and as well in the .spec file > reference the %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.tar.bz2 Fixed. Actually, didn't use the release tag in the source name: only the release number is referenced (%{release} contains the dist tag and I'd like the source.tar.bz2 to be independant from the distro name). > > 2). MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = > %{version}-%{release} > > Currently the .spec file has: > Requires: %{name} = %{version} > > That should be: > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > Fixed. (In reply to comment #55) > There is also an inconsistent usage of spaces. Fixed. (In reply to comment #56) > Please also add this for the main package and -devel package > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > > As you are using ldconfig in the post and postun section. Only added this Requires: to the post section for the devel package: in the other cases, rpmbuild generates it automatically (checked through the rpmbuild traces), so I thought it was not necessary. > > Furthermore for the -devel, also add: > Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(postun): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(post): /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd > Requires(postun): /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd > > As you are using /sbin/chkconfig and /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd in post, and > postun sections. Well, only added the chkconfig Requires: install/remove_initd is called only if present on the system we are installing on/deinstalling from, i.e. if the system is LSB compliant. If it is not, chkconfig is called. So chkconfig is THE one we need. (In reply to comment #57) > You also need to update your %post, %preun and %postun to take advantage of a > user updating the package. Good catch: actually, I had never tested the upgrade part of it and it was not correct! Fixed. New links: SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-14-3/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.14-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 12:43:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:43:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081243.m08ChWaZ003479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 07:43 EST ------- The object files should remain in the main package. But the .so link should be in the devel package. I personally think that static libraries, in a subpackage, could be useful, I have put the reasons on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PatriceDumas but you may disagree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 12:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:51:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081251.m08CpJNE023600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 07:51 EST ------- Also I would suggest passing INSTALL='install -p' or similar to make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT to keep header files timestamps, and I would also suggest dropping the .gz suffixes in the install-info scriptlets, install-info should figure them out automatically. What about the library unuran optionally depends on? (gsl, rngstream and prng). Is it useful to have them used during the build? I also think that it could be nice to have %check make check Also maybe you could ship the examples directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 13:00:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:00:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081300.m08D0lGO006288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-01-08 08:00 EST ------- Thanks for the review! (In reply to comment #5) > This shows up when you run rpmlint on the installed package: > libuser.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libuser.so.1.1.10 /lib64/libdl.so.2 > I don't think it's a big issue but perhaps you know what causes it. It just > looks like libuser.so is linked against libdl.so but doesn't actually call any > symbols from it. The -ldl is added by libgmodule's pkgconfig files. I'm not happy about it but I don't think this should be hacked around in libuser. > I've seen the "WITH_SELINUX" stuff in other formerly core packages and I have > to say I'm not quite sure what utility it has these days where everything is > always built with selinux support. Yes, it only encourages bug reports when !WITH_SELINUX breaks. I'll remove it. > I think the bit at the end of %install really should be in a %check section > instead, but that's not the kind of change I want to commit without consulting > you. Probably, I'll try that. > This file in the -devel package looks a bit odd: > /usr/include/libuser/default.-c > Any idea if that's a typo? That's not a typo. I should really get rid of this file... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 13:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081338.m08Dcd7q030706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-08 08:38 EST ------- Thanks Manuel! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kmplayer Short Description: Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend Owners: rdieter Branches: EL-5 F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 13:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081358.m08DwN0t014972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-08 08:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > * What file indicates the license of this software? > > /usr/share/doc/dbxml-perl-2.003/README says: > "Copyright (c) 2003-5 Paul Marquess. All rights reserved. This > program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > it under the same terms as Perl itself." Oh!! I didn't notice this! ------------------------------------------------------- This package (dbxml-perl) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081400.m08E00E1001434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-08 08:59 EST ------- Closing as this is on devel repo and request on bodhi is already done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:00:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081400.m08E02oh001813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 Bug 427373 depends on bug 250093, which changed state. Bug 250093 Summary: Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:05:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081405.m08E5lig016903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-08 09:05 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dbxml-perl Short Description: Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML Owners: mzazrive Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:15:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:15:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081415.m08EFDFM004668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-08 09:15 EST ------- I spoke to Mathias and he said that was a glib2 error and that it should be fixed for devel this week or next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:27:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:27:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081427.m08ERVHm020282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-08 09:27 EST ------- Well, still the tarball in your srpm does not match with what is written as Source0?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:39:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081439.m08Ed5hS022204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 09:39 EST ------- in my makefile.in i have mkdir "$(DESTDIR)$(programfilesdir)/languages" mv -f "$(DESTDIR)$(programfilesdir)/English.lf" "$(DESTDIR)$(programfilesdir)/languages" mv -f "$(DESTDIR)$(programfilesdir)/Italiano.lf" "$(DESTDIR)$(programfilesdir)/languages" so $(programfilesdir) should be different on different platforms... > MUSTFIX: there is a typo in %install, the buildroot is cleaned with _rm_ -fR > not with _rpm_ FIXED, i changed > sha1sum of the included tarball does not coincide with upstream I will upload a specific version for fedora distro, so there aren't update problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081439.m08Edm1H008244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 09:39 EST ------- i trying mock with mock rebuild -r fedora-8-i386 themonospot-0.6.5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 14:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081445.m08EjPJi009618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-08 09:45 EST ------- > so $(programfilesdir) should be different on different platforms... I can post my buildlog if it is useful to you. And please test building using fedora-development as target >> sha1sum of the included tarball does not coincide with upstream >I will upload a specific version for fedora distro, so there aren't update problems There is no need to do that. You can apply selective patches for fedora from within the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 15:46:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081546.m08FkZvb001364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-01-08 10:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > This fails to build for me: > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/share/info/dir > I can't duplicate this. Can you recheck this with the latest srpm? > The usual way to deal with this is to remove $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_infodir}/dir at > the end of %install. install-info will properly manage the info catalog in your > scriptlets. > > After doing that, I can build and check this; rpmlint has some complaints: > unuran.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 25, tab: line 1) > Not a big deal; fix it if you like. > > unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/include/unuran_urng_prng.h > unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/include/unuran_urng_rngstreams.h > unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/include/unuran.h > unuran.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/include/unuran_urng_gsl.h > These must go in a -devel package. > I moved to devel package, this is all that would be left: rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/unuran-1.1.0-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0 /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/COPYING /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/KNOWN-PROBLEMS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/NEWS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/README /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/THANKS /usr/share/doc/unuran-1.1.0/UPGRADE /usr/share/info/unuran.info.gz This is devel package: rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/unuran-devel-1.1.0-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm /usr/include/unuran.h /usr/include/unuran_urng_gsl.h /usr/include/unuran_urng_prng.h /usr/include/unuran_urng_rngstreams.h /usr/lib64/libunuran.so /usr/lib64/libunuran.so.7 /usr/lib64/libunuran.so.7.1.0 /usr/share/doc/unuran-devel-1.1.0 /usr/share/doc/unuran-devel-1.1.0/unuran.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 15:58:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:58:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] New: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mzazrivec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/xqilla/xqilla.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/xqilla/xqilla-2.0.0-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 implementation written in C++ and based on Xerces-C. It implements the DOM 3 XPath API, as well as having it's own more powerful API. It conforms to the W3C proposed recomendation of XQuery and XPath 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 15:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081559.m08FxWF6003202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xqilla - |Review Request: xqilla - |XQilla is an XQuery and |XQilla is an XQuery and |XPath 2.0 library, built on |XPath 2.0 library, built on |top of Xerces-C |top of Xerces-C ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-08 10:59 EST ------- scratch builds: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=334390 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=334400 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=334403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081617.m08GHEKD025203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 danms at us.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081621.m08GLvFJ025950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-08 11:21 EST ------- spoke to rvokal and he suggested a solution. to put the firstaidkit-pluginsystem in the firstaidkit package, make firstaidkit-devel require firstaidkit and make the plugins require firstaidkit. The only question left is how to get the proper behavior. That is: when user installs firstaidkit, firstaidkit and all its plugins install. and when plugin developer installs firstaidkit-devel, firstaidkit and firstaidkit-devel installs. rvokal told me that it can be done with groups. Any ideas on what needs to be done for this to happen? Please advise. I'll change the package structure for it to reflect what is suggested in this comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081635.m08GZZWv009809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 11:35 EST ------- i upload rel 4 of files here http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.i386.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.spec http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.src.rpm with this rpmlint... themonospot.i386: W: no-documentation themonospot.i386: E: no-binary themonospot.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib themonospot.i386: E: unknown-key GPG#c8fa4777 themonospot.i386: W: empty-%post themonospot.i386: W: empty-%postun and now i lunch # mock rebuild -r fedora-devel-i386 themonospot-0.6.5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081641.m08GfrQk029408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 11:41 EST ------- ERROR: No Spec file found in srpm.... why ? i verified and there is spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081641.m08Gfr41010775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 11:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081648.m08GmAQP011694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 11:48 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:44:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 421231] Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081644.m08GiqPB011040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde-l10n - Internationalization support for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421231 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 11:44 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason for the cvsextras: no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:47:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428000] New: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428000 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D- Bus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-dbus-0.03-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: D-Bus is a project that permits programs to communicate with each other, using a simple IPC protocol. This is an OCaml binding for D-Bus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 16:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 11:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428000] Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081654.m08Gs1tb031315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-dbus - OCaml library for using D-Bus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428000 ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-01-08 11:54 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-dbus-0.03-2.fc8.src.rpm Ooops - changed it to BuildRequire dbus-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081706.m08H6YWj001731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 12:06 EST ------- ok. Just let me know when that update is in, and I will get this formally reviewed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:13:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] New: Package review: vixie-cron-ng Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Please review this package. Bugzilla for old package review of vixie-cron #226529. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:17:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081717.m08HHm2x017742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-08 12:17 EST ------- What happens next? I don't see kerneloops in the PackageDB yet... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081719.m08HJncV018121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-08 12:19 EST ------- Just judging by the name - ew. fcron? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081727.m08HROGE019485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-08 12:27 EST ------- Actually it does, please make sure that you have downloaded the 1.5.0-1 srpm and pul the latest tarball from sf. emunson at grover:~/upload$ ls -lsa total 360 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 emunson emunson 4096 2008-01-08 09:23 . 4 drwxr-xr-x 50 emunson emunson 4096 2008-01-08 09:24 .. 352 -rw-r--r-- 1 emunson emunson 356118 2008-01-07 10:05 libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz emunson at grover:~/upload$ md5sum libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz 00e1cfb4f9197112c9779522d18bef9e libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz emunson at grover:/usr/src/rpm/SOURCES$ ls -lsa total 468 112 drwxrwsr-x 2 root src 110592 2008-01-08 09:25 . 4 drwxrwsr-x 7 root src 4096 2007-11-13 10:58 .. 352 -rw-r--r-- 1 root src 356118 2008-01-07 09:59 libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz emunson at grover:/usr/src/rpm/SOURCES$ md5sum libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz 00e1cfb4f9197112c9779522d18bef9e libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz The first was pulled from sf using wget and the second was retrieved by installing the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:30:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:30:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081730.m08HUsvc006429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-08 12:30 EST ------- I forgot. Package could be found here: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/vixie-cron-ng/ [1] My fork hasn't anything common with fcron. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:29:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081729.m08HTj59005894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 cebbert at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-08 12:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kerneloops Short Description: Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures Owners: cebbert Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081737.m08HbLtQ021219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-08 12:37 EST ------- The point is - why bother forking the ancient cruft of vixie-cron when there are other upstream projects with more features, etc.? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 17:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 12:43:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081743.m08HhVWj008148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-08 12:43 EST ------- I'll patch the .desktop file, you're right on there. Re: licensing. LGPL linked with GPL stuff -> GPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081806.m08I6joh012231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 13:06 EST ------- yeah.... success i renamed file .SPEC as .spec and... # mock rebuild -r fedora-devel-i386 themonospot-0.6.5-4.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.5 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(themonospot-0.6.5-4.src.rpm) Config(fedora-development-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(themonospot-0.6.5-4.src.rpm) Config(fedora-devel-i386) 5 minutes 23 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226891] Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081809.m08I9ZBO012390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226891 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-08 13:09 EST ------- Mind for an EL-5 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226891] Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081816.m08IGdhb013677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226891 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-08 13:16 EST ------- oops, this should be better: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dbus-qt New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: ausil,rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226891] Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081815.m08IFkdV013601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226891 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-08 13:15 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dbus-qt New Branches: EL-5 Updated EPEL Owners: dgilmore,rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:13:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081813.m08IDqAT013037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-08 13:13 EST ------- this is spec file and 2 output files of mock: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.spec http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-4.i386.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 18:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081858.m08IwwhT020296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-08 13:58 EST ------- made the respective changes given in comment 13. There is still the matter of the /usr/lib64 rpmlint warning ( please advise) Links : srpm : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm spec : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 19:24:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:24:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081924.m08JOKms006102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From rainwoodman at gmail.com 2008-01-08 14:24 EST ------- Yes, I need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 19:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:24:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081924.m08JOkKU024700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 rainwoodman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 19:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081925.m08JPGR8006627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 rainwoodman at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 19:46:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081946.m08JkO9I010186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-08 14:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/OpenEXR_CTL.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/OpenEXR_CTL-1.0.1-2.kwizart.fc8.src.rpm Description: A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL Fixed rpath and gcc43 ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 19:51:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:51:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801081951.m08JpJIk029566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-08 14:51 EST ------- there still seems to be some problematic issues to me. The release is broken since the autotools generated files don't seem to be there. Also in the release, a proper changelog should be there. If the changelog is in git commit messages, you should use the proper tool to generate a changelog file from the VCS. The upstream tarball cannot be found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 20:21:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239435] Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082021.m08KLDAR002124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Gnome Network Monitor - A Network Monitor for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239435 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-01-08 15:21 EST ------- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 20:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082021.m08KLn5o016278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2008-01-08 15:21 EST ------- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 20:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082028.m08KSkik003249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2008-01-08 15:28 EST ------- Guys, I'm very sorry but due to a policy change at work, I won't be able to maintain sunbird for Fedora in the long run. So I'd better stop now. But please feel free to reuse my srpm for future improvements if you feel like it. Sorry again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 21:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082123.m08LNLaF026697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-08 16:23 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291089) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291089&action=view) Wrapper script fixed for dual head usage Andrew Zabolotny, Can you give this slightly modified (using head -n 1 as suggested) nogravity.sh a try, I can't test this myself. Thanks, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 22:04:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 17:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239471] Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082204.m08M41rQ018865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: httptunnel - Tunnels a data stream in HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239471 foolish at guezz.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 23:32:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239043] Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082332.m08NWKNY031498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From tim at niemueller.de 2008-01-08 18:32 EST ------- The packages have been removed for the time being because of the possible patent problems. The issue has been discussed on the libdc1394-devel mailing list and a patch was proposed to remove the problematic piece of code. I'm currently waiting for a reply from the Fedora Board if that is a sufficient solution (freetype1 package is a precedence). If that is the case I will upload the packages with the patch again. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 23:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:35:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082335.m08NZaj8032192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-08 18:35 EST ------- Hmmm, it looks like kdeutils-4.0.0 contains some oktetapart sources, but the directory is missing a CMakeLists.txt and thus not actually being built. I guess I'll just reenable the oktetapart in this package, it's newer anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 8 23:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801082352.m08Nqtp7002116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-08 18:52 EST ------- Guys, What is the precedence for renaming a community package and the naming guidelines? - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:03:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:03:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226891] Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090003.m0903ZZx018648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbus-qt - dbus bindings for qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226891 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 19:03 EST ------- cvs done. I think there was already a EL-5 branch... updated owners -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:07:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090007.m0907G9s004429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 19:07 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090024.m090OH9k006686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-08 19:24 EST ------- Can we close this now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:27:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090027.m090ROpU007236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-08 19:27 EST ------- I updated my CVS tree but don't see any updates; please do let me know when you commit your changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090032.m090WhgA007945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-08 19:32 EST ------- **** Access denied: cebbert is not in ACL for rpms/kerneloops/devel Isn't the owner allowed to update the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:42:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090042.m090gdWv023939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-08 19:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > **** Access denied: cebbert is not in ACL for rpms/kerneloops/devel > > > Isn't the owner allowed to update the package? > I added myself to the committers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090046.m090kRl1010018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 19:46 EST ------- Package acls are generated twice an hour... It sounds like you tried a commit after I added it, but before the :31 acl generating job ran. Try again and it should work fine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 00:48:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090048.m090mc5n024791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-08 19:48 EST ------- a job runs at the top of the hour that updates the acls in CVS you need to wait for that to happen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 01:09:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090109.m0919IvT028283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-08 20:09 EST ------- Should fedora_requires_release_note be set now that the package has built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 01:17:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090117.m091HVhg029615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 20:17 EST ------- Yep. Anytime you like. You might also add a note about what kind of info you would like them to add for the release note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 01:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090116.m091G2iH029357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-08 20:16 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GFDL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 09247597b21c6253b810f081053e56b5 diveintopython-html-5.4.zip 09247597b21c6253b810f081053e56b5 diveintopython-html-5.4.zip.sav OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. See below - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The html subpackage should own: /usr/share/diveintopython-html/ The pdf should own: /usr/share/diveintopython-pdf etc. ie, they are missing ownership of the top level datadir/name dir. 2. rpmlint says: diveintopython.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 30) Suggest: Might use only spaces or only tabs. Not a blocker. diveintopython-html.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/diveintopython-html/diveintopython.css/diveintopython.css diveintopython-single-html.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/diveintopython-single-html/diveintopython.css/diveintopython.css diveintopython-txt.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/diveintopython-single-html/diveintopython.css/diveintopython.css The css file is CR/LF... I don't think this matters as long as it's properly read. Suggest: Ignore, unless you see problems loading it. Issue #1 is pretty minor, provided you fix that before importing this package, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 01:39:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090139.m091dvx4032267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-08 20:39 EST ------- fedora-ds-admin.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ds-admin-cvs.sh 0775 fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/ASDialogs.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/AdminUtil.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/ConfigDSDialogs.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv-admin fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/RegDSDialogs.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/AdminServer.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/AdminMigration.pm fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/dirsrv-admin fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin fix the file permissions on the perl modules and /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv-admin they should be 644 not 755 /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv-admin should be marked as config noreplace fix the use of subsys in the initscript source matches upstream [dennis at bratac SPECS]$ sha1sum fedora-ds-admin-1.1.1.tar.bz2 b06576c65f7b649472229d2435a1275442f0d8ec fedora-ds-admin-1.1.1.tar.bz2 [dennis at bratac SPECS]$ sha1sum ../SOURCES/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.1.tar.bz2 b06576c65f7b649472229d2435a1275442f0d8ec ../SOURCES/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.1.tar.bz2 Then it will be in pretty good shape -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 01:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090150.m091okIT019093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-08 20:50 EST ------- I also wanted to save the info about fixing the subsys-not-used error. (06:26:08 PM) richm: What does "subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/dirsrv-admin" mean? (06:26:45 PM) dgilmore: it means we are not putting a lock file in /var/lock/subsys (06:28:35 PM) richm: What is a lock file used for? (06:29:44 PM) dgilmore: supposed to let you know if its running or not (06:31:03 PM) dgilmore: in start at the end add [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && touch /var/lock/subsys/$servicename(06:31:34 PM) dgilmore: in the end of stop add a chekc for retvalue and cleanup the file (06:31:57 PM) richm: And if it's started without using the init script, then stopped with the init script, or vice versa? (06:32:20 PM) richm: Just ignore the missing file (or presence of the unexpected file)? (06:32:53 PM) dgilmore: pretty much yeah (06:33:22 PM) dgilmore: the condrestart should checkfor the lockfile and restart only if it exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 02:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416471] Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090205.m0925VfW021440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xsel -- manipulate the X selection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416471 ------- Additional Comments From nospam at thenerdshow.com 2008-01-08 21:05 EST ------- Same location. File date should reflect changes. My rpm junk bin: http://thenerdshow.com/rpm/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 02:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 21:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090228.m092SnRw006730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-01-08 21:28 EST ------- Bumped to jruby 1.1rc1. New URLs: Spec: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/jruby.spec SRPM: http://konrad.sobertillnoon.com/fedora/jruby-1.1-0.3.20080108svn.fc8.src.rpm Would very much appreciate a review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:06:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090406.m0946P9O007180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-08 23:06 EST ------- Would you consider using "-fedora" for the suffix instead of "-Fedora"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:04:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090404.m0944vY2021695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090404.m0944w5n021721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427482 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:29:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090429.m094T3bD024736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-08 23:29 EST ------- I guess docbook-build-tools wouldn't be an good name anyway... Having thought a little more about it and looked at the package more here are my thoughts on the naming: - first I think the initial reaction to the name from the Fedora point of view is that there are problems with both words in the name: - "documentation" is vague: it can refer to many different things ranging from readme files under %doc, to manpages, to info or html included in the source (which might one day be generated using this package if they care for docbook), or manuals in docbook which I think is the main target of this package: we have lacked good documentation in Fedora to date. :) - the "devel" suffix is usually not used for tools but subpackages of libraries with development files associated with C libraries, etc. - I looked at our package naming guidelines and they were vague on this case. But to give an extreme example it is a little like starting a new project for a browser (or an editor) and calling it "browser" (or "editor"). "documentation-devel" is better than that of course, but naively it seems it could be made a bit less generic without loosing its generality. I understand the Red Hat Docs team have been using this package name internally for several years and are pretty comfortable with it, and that you want to keep this package generic (in the sense of commodity) to encourage others in the community outside Fedora to use it for their international documentation needs. If renaming the newly open-sourced project upstream is not an option I might suggest at least adding some suffix, eg documentation-devel-tools, to make the name slightly less generic. I think it would be ok for the package to obsolete or provide documentation-devel for backward compatibility if necessary. It might help also to see an example package that shows how it would be used to get a better idea about it. And to hear of about any plans to push documentation to fedora, etc to get a bigger picture. :) If this package is positioned as the cornerstone of our documentation infrastructure it might still be reasonable to keep a pretty general name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090438.m094c953025922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-08 23:38 EST ------- If the license is actually "GPL 2 or later", the license tag should be "GPLv2+". docbook-xsl is big and it should really be in a separate package IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 04:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090457.m094vpKY013424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(panemade at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-08 23:57 EST ------- your packaging should work like this. firstaidkit developer when installs firstaidkit-devel, he will get firstaidkit and firstaidkit-devel gets installed on his system. Any specific reason to let user install all plugins when he try to install only firstaidkit rpm? when a developer creates new plugins he will create new firstaidkit-plugins- package and submit it. Newly developed plugin should go to %{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/pluginNAME/ Now you can either create a empty firstaidkit-plugins-all which will pull all newly added plugins packages. (See nagios-plugins SPEC) Or let end user install it separately only with no -all subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 05:01:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090501.m0951OgG029289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 00:01 EST ------- make requires in -devel as Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} install or cp commands should use -p option. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 05:09:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090509.m0959CYo030269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 00:09 EST ------- As, -devel only provides examples. I will suggest to create examples directory under %{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins and install example files there. so you just need to change following line in %install %{__cp} -rf plugins/ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins to %{__install} -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/examples %{__cp} -rf plugins/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/examples I think good example for you is to look in libextractor SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 06:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 01:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426460] Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090647.m096l0Nh011109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbim - Jabber client for mere mortals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426460 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-01-09 01:46 EST ------- Done. The branch has been removed from cvs and marked removed in the pkgdb. It will still shows up on the jabbim page (with status Removed) until I fix the pkgdb to not display removed branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090806.m0986OBW006528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2008-01-09 03:06 EST ------- Thanks for all the work done on this review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090807.m0987iAG006730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2008-01-09 03:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: boxes Short Description: Draw any kind of box around some given text Owners: jhrozek Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090826.m098Qxn0009056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-09 03:26 EST ------- The upstream name is not right to begin with. I don't know about a precedent, but I myself ask upstream to change their name when it is to short or too generic (I did that for g2lib, so far they haven't acted, but I did what I could). I also made that recommendation for ht. But here it is easily done since you are also upstream. The name of the package is part of the 'quality' of the package and having a name too generic seems to be to me a good enough reason not to include it in fedora. There are no precise guidelines about what makes a package unsuitable for inclusion in fedora (except for license guidelines), but having a package that abuses the shared namespaces (package name, library name, binary in /usr/bin name) is in my opinion a reason sufficient to block a release if upstream is under the fedora umbrella. In any case please try to think at your software name from the perspective of free software community (other developers and users) and ask yourself, is my package rightly named? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090833.m098XQPI025676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] New: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/powertop.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/powertop-1.9-0.fc8.src.rpm Description: Computer programs can make your computer use more power. PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:41:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090841.m098ftDb027141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 03:41 EST ------- Suggestions 1) change Source URL look like to http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/powertop/download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 2) rpmlint gave me powertop.i386: E: description-line-too-long PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. ==> Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. 3) you don't need find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:42:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090842.m098gjSG011176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:47:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090847.m098lgwI027907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 03:47 EST ------- I did some SPEC modifications. I am attaching modified SPEC below. I have not added plugins subpackage yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:48:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:48:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090848.m098mODt027950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 03:48 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291123) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291123&action=view) Modified SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:49:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090849.m098nPLZ028036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 03:49 EST ------- All the changes have been mode as required. Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/powertop.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/powertop-1.9-0.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 08:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090853.m098rXGF028863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-09 03:53 EST ------- to [3] because I can't say selinux and pam in fcron is ok. I didn't test many other features and the main reason is the vixie-cron-ng will support inotify, which is needed for battery saving. I don't see anything ancient on using inotify ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090901.m0991rgN014265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - PowerTOP is a Linux tool that helps you find those programs that are misbehaving while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 04:01 EST ------- Make the habit of increasing release tag for each newly posted SRPM otherwise it may confuse reviewer. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 7e2cd799941350a45586edac43760ac9 powertop-1.9.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090906.m0996DtB031975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: powertop - |Review Request: powertop - |PowerTOP is a Linux tool |tool that helps you find |that helps you find those |misbehaving programs while |programs that are |your computer is idle. |misbehaving while your | |computer is idle. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090921.m099LV57018166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-09 04:21 EST ------- Why is powertop being reviewed? powertop is already in Fedora http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090927.m099RqHx002794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 04:27 EST ------- damn! How come I miss this to check? Thanks for replying here before cvs request placed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:30:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090930.m099Uk0D003383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 04:30 EST ------- Sorry for the trouble, i seem to have missed it to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 09:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426827] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801090955.m099tJ4S007187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426827 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 04:55 EST ------- yup, this is rather confusing. I can't find anything about license for this code anywhere. I've submitted a bug upstream : http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32186 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091004.m09A4Tj0024892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-09 05:04 EST ------- to [4] I'm sorry that takes so long. I was thought about auto tools and I've finally attached ./configure into source code. Also CHANGES were generated from git-log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:03:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:03:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091003.m09A3qAT024824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-09 05:03 EST ------- I am glad to help. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091012.m09ACX4c010026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 05:12 EST ------- Not sure what you call 'Author/Developer tests'. Anyway, I'm asking some perl devs here to take a look at the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091018.m09AIXlc027101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 05:18 EST ------- Thanks Parag, I've fixed the URL. Thanks for your comments Ville. I've added the more strict BR on xerces-c-devel. Changing LANG doesn't change the tests results, though. I'm asking some perl devs here to look at the issues. New version : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-XML-Xerces.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091019.m09AJmUN027178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 huzaifas at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 05:19 EST ------- Hi, I cannot sponsor your package, I can just review it: [root at dhcp1-17 ~]# rpmlint python-urwid-0.9.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for python python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Also tmpl_tutorial.html should have gone to doc i guess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091023.m09AN6YE028090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 05:23 EST ------- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:35:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091035.m09AZPkT013577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 05:35 EST ------- Also this package does not build for me, using rpmbuild: running build_ext error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56412 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428103] Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091050.m09Aoe2E032450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: powertop - tool that helps you find misbehaving programs while your computer is idle. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428103 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 05:50 EST ------- Thanks for that. I wish someone please write a script and/or add it to commit button on new package process submission that will check newly introducing package name on koji build server and in existing bugzilla review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:52:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] New: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-User.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-User-1.8-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This module allows applications to retrieve per-user characteristics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:51:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter-0.03-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: HTML::PrettyPrinter produces nicely formatted HTML code from a HTML syntax tree. It is especially useful if the produced HTML file shall be read or edited manually afterwards. Various parameters let you adapt the output to different styles and requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-WWW-Search.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-WWW-Search-2.496-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: This class is the parent for all access methods supported by the WWW::Search library. This library implements a Perl API to web-based search engines. See README for a list of search engines currently supported, and for a lot of interesting high-level information about this distribution. Search results can be limited, and there is a pause between each request to avoid overloading either the client or the server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091051.m09ApXht015904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 05:51 EST ------- I guess this means you add python-devel as BuildRoot if i am not wrong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] New: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Net-eBay.spec SRPM URL: http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Net-eBay-0.45-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This module helps user to easily execute queries against eBay's XML API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:49:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091049.m09Anivo015292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 05:49 EST ------- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - Spec file matches base package name. - Spec has consistant macro usage. - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - License: (GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+) - License field in spec matches - License file included in package Only GPL included, LGPL also needed? - Spec in American English - Spec is legible. - Sources match upstream md5sum: yes - Package needs ExcludeArch - BuildRequires correct - Spec handles locales/find_lang - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - Package has a correct %clean section. - Package has correct buildroot - Package is code or permissible content. - Doc subpackage not needed - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - .so files in -devel subpackage. - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - .la files are removed. - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - Package owns all the directories it creates. - No rpmlint output. - final provides and requires are sane - Obsoletes seem sane: Provides: anjuta-gdl = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: anjuta-gdl < 0.7.7-1 Provides: anjuta-gdl-devel = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: anjuta-gdl-devel < 0.7.7-1 SHOULD Items: - Builds in koji using rawhide tag on all supported archs - Sane scriptlets. - Subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - Has dist tag Issues: 1. Minor: add: "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig" 2. Minor: Only GPL included, LGPL also needed? Outstanding issues are minor, can be fixed after import: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091054.m09AsL73000388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |428114 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:55:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091055.m09AtlRN000936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426827, 428112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:57:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091057.m09AvSQJ001042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-09 05:57 EST ------- Fixed. The CSS file is not an issue it still functions fine. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/diveintopython/diveintopython-5.4-6.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091054.m09AsMCc000409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428115 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091055.m09AtmbR000957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428113 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426827] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091055.m09AtmdK000977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426827 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428113 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 10:58:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 05:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091058.m09AwUjT016717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 05:58 EST ------- It also occurred to me that perhaps gnome-gdl might also work as a name, to make it clear that it is for GNOME related build tools. libgdl might be confused as a library that gdl is dependent on, but I'm happy to be persuaded otherwise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091106.m09B6sSq018460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-09 06:06 EST ------- Just one small thing i saw that is: i would replace %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor with %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" I am also not sure if we need " || :" after check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091121.m09BLn8W020382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 06:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Just one small thing i saw that is: > i would replace > %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor > with > %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > This is a noarch package, so OPTIMIZE is not needed. > I am also not sure if we need " || :" after check You're right, it is not in the template, I'll remove it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:40:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091140.m09BeLVW022792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-09 06:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > It also occurred to me that perhaps gnome-gdl might also work as a name, to make > it clear that it is for GNOME related build tools. I chose libgdl since that is what Debian and Ubuntu calls it, and I thought it would be a good idea to have consistent naming across distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091149.m09Bn3A0023657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091154.m09Bs12n008694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-09 06:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Issues: > > 1. Minor: add: "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig" The following notation automatically mentions the "Requires(post): ...": %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > 2. Minor: Only GPL included, LGPL also needed? The upstream tarball does not provide the text of the LGPL. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-90d644ce2c5db60bad3ba8773fe11653c7629dc3 we should only include a license file as documentation if upstream provided it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091156.m09BunRR009224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 06:56 EST ------- I don't think you need %check ||: make it %check only. Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b8b2c677dc4ef08e84b5b4f8cb021540 User-1.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..3 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Wed Jan 9 06:21:40 2008 # Current time GMT: Wed Jan 9 11:21:40 2008 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 + Package perl-User-1.8-1.fc9 -> Provides: perl(User) = 1.8 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091157.m09Bv5Yj024872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091158.m09BwsUu024948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 06:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > 1. Minor: add: "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig" > The following notation automatically mentions the "Requires(post): ...": > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig OK, didn't know that, great. > > 2. Minor: Only GPL included, LGPL also needed? > > The upstream tarball does not provide the text of the LGPL. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#head-90d644ce2c5db60bad3ba8773fe11653c7629dc3 > we should only include a license file as documentation if upstream provided it. sure, but we are supposed to pester upstream to ask them to include it. Anyway, none of these are blockers, so go ahead and import... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:58:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091158.m09Bwk2Y009385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 debarshi.ray at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 11:58:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 06:58:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091158.m09BwUIj009333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-09 06:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgdl Short Description: Components and library for GNOME development tools Owners: rishi Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes NB: I inherited anjuta-gdl and renaming it to libgdl. So anjuta-gdl should be deleted from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091207.m09C7bIO026731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 07:07 EST ------- As this package is not compiling anything in build stage no need of OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" I don't think you need to set -x and set +x Don't think you need %check ||: Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4d3f84ba4e35cb7fac863b828b7f2b68 HTML-PrettyPrinter-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-Iblib/lib" "-Iblib/arch" test.pl 1..3 # Running under perl version 5.008008 for linux # Current time local: Wed Jan 9 06:55:34 2008 # Current time GMT: Wed Jan 9 11:55:34 2008 # Using Test.pm version 1.25 ok 1 ok 1 ok 2 ok 3 exit 0 + Package perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter-0.03-1.fc9 -> Provides: perl(HTML::PrettyPrinter) = 0.03 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:11:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426827] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091211.m09CBeio012038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Precise - Perform common time and date operations with additional GPS operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426827 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 07:11 EST ------- thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:09:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:09:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091209.m09C9kh4026901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 07:09 EST ------- will review this once its dependent packages will be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091218.m09CITHi028570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 07:18 EST ------- Also put a link to the upstream GNOME bugzilla link in a comment in the spec file with a note saying upstream clarified the license on the bug and are (hopefully) working to include it in the next release. Please keep checking to see whether they mean GPLv2+ (which they probably do) rather than GPLv2 and update spec accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:16:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091216.m09CGk0j028438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 07:16 EST ------- MUST FIX items: 1) OK, I think that we should go back to the monolithic package for the moment, to avoid duplication of docs and to make sure upgrades from the old gnome-themes-extras goes smoothly. The good news is that I did a koji build on rawhide that worked: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=336678 Also there are some (mostly) small issues with running rpmlint on the packages $ rpmlint *.rpm gnome-themes-extras.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 20) gnome-themes-extras-darklooks.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized darklooks theme gnome-themes-extras-darklooks.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Darklooks is a meta-theme that is part of the gnome-themes-extras package. This package gnome-themes-extras-foxtrot.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Foxtrot is a meta-theme that is part of the gnome-themes-extras package. This package gnome-themes-extras-gion.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Gion is a meta-theme that is part of the gnome-themes-extras package. This package gnome-themes-extras-neu.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description pacakge package gnome-themes-extras-neu.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Neu is a meta-theme that is part of the gnome-themes-extras pacakge. This package 2) Remember, Description lines should be no longer than 80 chars, and that Summary should start with a capital letter. 3) You are also mixing tabs and spaces in the spec file which makes the spec file look odd in different editors, for example in Emacs it looks like this: %package foxtrot Requires: gnome-icon-theme, gnome-themes Group: User Interface/Desktops Summary: Foxtrot metatheme %description foxtrot Foxtrot is a meta-theme that is part of the gnome-themes-extras package. This package requires that you use a Gnome 2.2 release or newer. 4) * Mon Jan 7 2008 Marc Wiriadisastra - 2.20-3 - Added patches to remove non-licensed themes isn't true any more, so should be removed/updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091223.m09CNsw4013638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-09 07:23 EST ------- You watch to see they actually update SVN here: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-themes-extras/trunk/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 12:31:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191492] Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091231.m09CV6vh030826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unuran-0.7.2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191492 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at gmail.com 2008-01-09 07:31 EST ------- OK I have: * split into devel package * install -p * add examples * fix pre,post stuff I don't think adding the gsl, etc stuff is useful (at least not for me). Does anyone want it? rpmlint is (almost) silent - only complaint is: rpmlint RPM/RPMS/x86_64/unuran-devel-1.1.0-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm unuran-devel.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/unuran-devel-1.1.0/examples/.deps unuran-devel.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/unuran-devel-1.1.0/examples/.deps I think this is ignorable - I suspect the examples are not too useful without this. Please try: https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/unuran.spec https://nbecker.dyndns.org/RPM/unuran-1.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 13:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091307.m09D78tg020469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 08:07 EST ------- Thanks Parag. Btw, please note this one have a missing BR: on perl(Test::Pod::Coverage). Some functions are not documented, thus the test fails. I've filled a bug upstream http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32184 and documented this in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 13:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091338.m09Dc5Su024731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 08:38 EST ------- Thx Parag. %make check fixed in : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-User.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-User-1.8-2.fc8.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-User Short Description: API for locating user information regardless of OS Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 13:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091345.m09DjLKc009703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 08:45 EST ------- Thx Parag. %check and set -x/set +x fixed in : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter-0.03-2.fc8.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter Short Description: Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 14:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] New: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary-0.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: A simple "About this computer" screen that summarizes your system's hardware and software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 14:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091425.m09EPqaI017042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 09:25 EST ------- Please close this bug when rebuild and request on koji is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 14:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378791] Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091435.m09EZJ3o002190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netdump-server - netdump crash recovery capture server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378791 nhorman at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From nhorman at redhat.com 2008-01-09 09:35 EST ------- yep, all done. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 14:48:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091448.m09EmmcX020441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 14:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091447.m09ElQ4u020306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|clumens at redhat.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |clumens at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From clumens at redhat.com 2008-01-09 09:47 EST ------- rpmlint runs cleanly. > URL: http://linux.dell.com/%{name}/ I don't see efibootmgr-0.5.4 (the version out of %{version}) available so I can't check that the sources in the package match the upstream source. > Conflicts: elilo < 3.6-5 > Obsoletes: elilo < 3.6-5 I believe the Obsoletes should be enough to make sure that elilo gets replaced. > touch -r src/man/man8/%{name}.8 src/man/man8/%{name}.8.gz Not sure what the point of that in the %install section is, unless you need to fake out install somehow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:00:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091500.m09F0RHI006520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 10:00 EST ------- 1)If direct download link of tarball is not available then add some text in comments on how tarball can be created? 2)for desktop file installation you should use desktop-file-install command. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 here, you may like to add --vendor="fedora" 3) rpmlint output on srpm gave me system-summary.src: W: strange-permission system-summary.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091503.m09F3KxP007239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-09 10:03 EST ------- I'd highly recommend leaving out the capitalization, stick with openexr_ctl here. In a perfect world, I'd also rename OpenEXR -> openexr , but I've been to lazy to do that (yet). Hmm... I thought there was some non-free license issue (non commercial?) with this, but that's only going off of foggy/vague recollection from past openexr mailing list dicussions. ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307891] Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091514.m09FELYM025271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 10:14 EST ------- Well: ---------------------------------------------------------------- $ ls -al old/*gz *gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 356118 2008-01-08 03:05 libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 351239 2007-12-28 16:56 old/libvpd-1.5.0.tar.gz ---------------------------------------------------------------- The tarball in sourceforge.net changed.... What happened?? It seems that you are one of the upstream developers so: Please don't change the tarball which is once formally released. It surely confuses people who want to use the tarball (and actually did...) So would you retrieve the original 1.5.0 tarball and "release the new tarball" if you want to modify the original tarball itself? Anyway: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091520.m09FKgtj010405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-09 10:20 EST ------- ok, nevermind, I think it was only gpl-incompatible, but still free (enough). :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:20:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 291741] Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091520.m09FKtEX010455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-hearts - Game of Hearts implementation for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291741 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 10:20 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091520.m09FK8RD026428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 10:20 EST ------- Would you try to rebuild cppad on koji? If some troubles still exist, please tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:26:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091526.m09FQQgQ011482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-09 10:26 EST ------- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm Final version + I removed synce-gnome. I will submit it as a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091527.m09FRq5a011649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(devrim at commandprom | |pt.com) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 10:27 EST ------- Would you check the spec file attached on comment 22? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:31:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091531.m09FVBp9028374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-09 10:31 EST ------- About the Capitalization problem, I would say it's strange but it have some sense... I think the real package names are OpenEXR but because it can also be compiled on win32 they left the capitalization... Actually i'm close to have OpenEXR_Viewers ready for review and the package name (defined in configure.ac) is OpenEXR_Viewers which means they install doc in %{_datadir}/doc/OpenEXR_Viewers-%{version}. same are the pkgconfig files that are named OpenEXR.pc CTL.pc and OpenEXR_CTL.pc here. About the pkgconfig problem (do you have the pkgconfig patch I've added later?): Because not all libs are used when linking there is lot of unused-direct-shlib-dependencies (rpmlint OpenEXR-libs on installed files ). I would say it would be interesting to clean them. There were also a undefined-non-weak symbol (fixed by the pkgconfig patch) that prevent it to be linked from OpenEXR_Viewers...(CTL libs was missing). I first thought it was due to the CTL 1.4.1 been used with OpenEXR 1.6.0 (instead of 1.6.1). But it seems to work. So I wonder if it worth the case to have OpenEXR updated to 1.6.1 in F-8 (seems bugfixes), What do you think about updating OpenEXR for F-8 ?! The FE-LEGAL has been discussed in http://bugzilla.redhat.com/357461 Tom said it was "Free, but GPL incompatible". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091544.m09FiCx8030369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-09 10:44 EST ------- good point about the pkg name vs pkgconfig, I hadn't considered that. either way works. your pkgconfig patch here looks like a very good start, send that upstream. :) re: unused-direct-shlib-dependencies : good point, I could/should hack in -Wl,-unused like you did here. Re: OpenEXR-1.6.x for F-8, I'm definitely ok with that, just need to be careful about the soname changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 15:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091552.m09Fq3aC032004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-09 10:52 EST ------- My trouble is related to my DSL modem at home. It seems to connect fine through Windows, but I am having trouble connecting through Fedora. I think I have found someone I know who may be capable of solving the problem. In the meantime, I am using cygwin to access Fedora's cvs repository and Kevin has been helping me by submitting my builds and reporting back the results; see the changelog in http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/cppad/devel/cppad.spec?rev=1.3&view=auto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:00:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:00:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091600.m09G0v0E017680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-09 11:00 EST ------- Rebuilt failed in mock at the OpenEXR test (with gcc43 but went fine with gcc 4.1.2)... I Will investigate this: I can disable the OpenEXR test (like i did for fixing OpenEXR_CTL for gcc43) or fix the test, but maybe that's related to OpenEXR-devel not fixed for gcc43... I will have a look... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091603.m09G3jdn001500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:02:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091602.m09G2wRW017970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091607.m09G76mj018787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:07 EST ------- > Any specific reason to let user install all plugins when he try to install only > firstaidkit rpm? > I want to be friendly to our end user. I would hate the user to have to hunt down the plugins that he needs. A more automated approach would be the install all relevant plugins. The idea of the firstaidkit-plugins-all is excellent, This would look at the system for stuff and according to what it finds it will install the relative plugin. (For example, if the system is using lvm, the install-all script would install the firstaidkit-plugin-lvm) So this package would not bring all the plugins but the relative ones. I would run some test scripts at install time that return true/false and make the decision from there. Any comments, maybe you know an simpler way of achieving this? thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091614.m09GEOOY019884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |427660 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:14:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091614.m09GEbhu019946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091613.m09GDTdj019776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:13 EST ------- Sorry for the double reply. just wanted to address that install-all issue separately. (In reply to comment #15) > your packaging should work like this. > > firstaidkit developer when installs firstaidkit-devel, he will get firstaidkit > and firstaidkit-devel gets installed on his system. > Yep thats the way I left it :) > > when a developer creates new plugins he will create new > firstaidkit-plugins- package and submit it. Newly developed plugin > should go to %{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/pluginNAME/ yes this is correct, but the plugin doesn't necessarily have to be a dir. > > Now you can either create a empty firstaidkit-plugins-all which will pull all > newly added plugins packages. > (See nagios-plugins SPEC) I'll take a peak. > Or let end user install it separately only with no -all subpackage. I would maybe like the liberty to do both. The user might want to just install one plugin, so he will use `yum install firstaidkit-plugin-lvm` but if he wants a system wide rescue/check he will do a `yum install firstaidkit-plugin-all`. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:24:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091624.m09GORCD004676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > to [3] because I can't say selinux and pam in fcron is ok. I didn't test many > other features and the main reason is the vixie-cron-ng will support inotify, > which is needed for battery saving. I don't see anything ancient on using > inotify ;-) Sure, but I think it might be better to work with an existing upstream project on these features if possible (akin to using/extending rsyslog rather than forking ourselves.) Do we have other distros interested in picking up our fork? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:24:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091624.m09GOsxQ021532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(devrim at commandprom| |pt.com) | ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-01-09 11:24 EST ------- Oh yes. Thanks for that -- it works on my test servers, too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091625.m09GP2S9021899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(matt_domsch at dell.c| |om) | ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-09 11:25 EST ------- Chris, thanks for the quick review. I'll post 0.5.4 as soon as this passes review, I just wanted to wait to roll any critical found changes from this review into the release. I was told on IRC that the Conflicts is necessary too. notting, advice? the touch statement is just to get the timestamp to match the file from the tarball, so that it doesn't get set to a newer timestamp unnecessarily just because it got compressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091625.m09GPAG4005129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-09 11:25 EST ------- Ok that's fixed with a configure test fix conftest.cc:32: error: 'system' was not declared in this scope added %patch2 (without bumping release)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091626.m09GQPU3005344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:26 EST ------- Available now; or get libuser-0.56.7-1 from rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:36:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:36:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378951] Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091636.m09Gax4a023858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378951 ------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra at gmail.com 2008-01-09 11:36 EST ------- Any plans of building for F-8 and F-7? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:36:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091636.m09GaVOT006903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:36 EST ------- [7] I hope that they will. I was looking in other distribution, which cron they are using and they have some fork of vixie-cron. I think on the servers everyone is using some vixie-cron with patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091634.m09GYaac006266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:34 EST ------- Thinking... the conflicts might help ensure the right thing happens if someone just does 'yum install efibootmgr' on a system that already has elilo. But I don't think it's absolutely necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:50:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 378951] Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091650.m09GoOgT009026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-photran - Eclipse Fortran Development Tools (Photran) plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378951 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2008-01-09 11:50 EST ------- Well, I was waiting for the final release of 4.0.0 before releasing for F-8. Can't release for F-7 because photran requires CDT 4.0.1. I'm building photran for F-8 now and will push to updates-testing if it succeeds. I think I'll still wait for 4.0.0 final before pushing to updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 16:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091654.m09GsrCc026420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-09 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > As, -devel only provides examples. I will suggest to create examples directory > under %{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins and install example files there. > so you just need to change following line in %install > %{__cp} -rf plugins/ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins > to > %{__install} -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/examples > %{__cp} -rf plugins/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/examples Was looking through your posted spec file, and you change this issue slightly by putting the examples in %{_datadir} instead of %{_libdir}. I would want them in libdir and for sample3plugin/plugin to be executable so the plugin developer can run the examples by calling firstaidkit `-execute=example1`. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091725.m09HPRMF032285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 12:25 EST ------- Thanks. I will check this package again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:26:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091726.m09HQO9t015553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-09 12:26 EST ------- Thanks Bill. Seeing as how elilo will hopefully be disapperaing in favor of grub w/ EFI capability, the comps file will list efibootmgr but not elilo. So upgrades from a distro version which used the combo elilo package, to a distro version that doesn't, needs that line in the efibootmgr package (as efibootmgr will be listed in comps). Chris, with this addressed, any remaining concerns? Thanks, Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:28:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091728.m09HSA9K015719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 12:28 EST ------- Before checking this package, would you confirm the license of the following file(s) to upstream developer? I guess the upstream forgot to change the license. ------------------------------------------------------------------- src/mapm/mapm_mt.cpp ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091731.m09HV58B001019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 12:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > would you confirm the license of > the following file(s) to upstream developer? Umm.. I used a strange English... Anyway please ask the license of the files above to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091739.m09Hdmci017812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-09 12:39 EST ------- For 2.0.0-0: * Source - XQilla 2.0.0 source coincides, however for xerces_c source file, the tarball in your srpm is different from what I downloaded from the URL written as Source0: ---------------------------------------------------------- 7760004 2005-09-08 23:14 xerces-c-src_2_7_0.tar.gz 8031146 2007-11-11 06:03 xqilla-2.0.0-0.fc9/xerces-c-src_2_7_0.tar.gz ---------------------------------------------------------- * Parallel make - If this is parallel make unsafe, please write a comment on the spec file. Other things are okay, except for license issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 17:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:47:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091747.m09Hlktc003542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 clumens at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From clumens at redhat.com 2008-01-09 12:47 EST ------- Nope, looks fine to me. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:10:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091810.m09IACXp023251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-09 13:10 EST ------- Please include the description given here in your spec file under the Description section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:13:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091813.m09IDMrM023612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 13:13 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091822.m09IMG7p009148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 13:22 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091818.m09IIW5F008428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 13:18 EST ------- cvs done. For anjuta-gdl, please follow the package end of life page at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091825.m09IP8gW025736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 13:25 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:30:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091830.m09IUE9j010654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-09 13:30 EST ------- I generated new spec and srpm. I included most of the changes to the spec file. comments: currently rpmling has two issues: firstaidkit-devel.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib firstaidkit-plugin-all.noarch: W: no-documentation FYI, these issues are also present in nagios-plugins packages. srpm : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit-0.1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm spec : http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/firstaidkit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091830.m09IUStv026504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 ------- Additional Comments From rainwoodman at gmail.com 2008-01-09 13:30 EST ------- Hi, thank you. After doing that, should I submit a new URL or just attach modified file here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091834.m09IYjhR026819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-09 13:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291181&action=view) diffs to fix rpmlint items With these fixes, the only complaint I get is the W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin Is this OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091835.m09IZgLt027313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-09 13:35 EST ------- Hi: Updated spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary-0.0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > 1)If direct download link of tarball is not available then add some text in > comments on how tarball can be created? > > 2)for desktop file installation you should use desktop-file-install command. > see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 > here, you may like to add --vendor="fedora" > > 3) rpmlint output on srpm gave me > system-summary.src: W: strange-permission system-summary.spec 0600 > A file that you listed to include in your package has strange > permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. I've fixed 1. (created a download location for the tarball) and 2., 3. is an artifact of how I made the srpm (rpmbuild -ts), and will go away once everything is in distcvs. Thanks for taking a look! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091848.m09Im7rh013330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-09 13:48 EST ------- I'd wager that most reviewers are going to be waiting for some Java packaging guidelines first. Hopefully something will happen there soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091851.m09Ipje1030544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #291181|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-09 13:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291184) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291184&action=view) the real patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 18:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091858.m09IwN7T031952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-09 13:58 EST ------- Updates based on patch: Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/fedora-ds-admin.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/fedora-ds-admin-1.1.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 19:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091905.m09J57Z7017197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 ------- Additional Comments From ebmunson at us.ibm.com 2008-01-09 14:05 EST ------- Please submit a new URL with the new spec file and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 19:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801091939.m09JdF6o023166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 matt_domsch at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt_domsch at dell.com 2008-01-09 14:39 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: efibootmgr Short Description: EFI Boot Manager Owners: mdomsch,notting,clumens Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 20:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 15:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427662] Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092059.m09KxanZ003488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427662 ondrejj at salstar.sk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-09 15:59 EST ------- Why you are using group Development/Tools ? It has nothing with development. I think better group is defined upstream: Applications/Archiving, or may be Applications/System. %{__chmod} 0644 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}* - it is not necessary, just add %attr(0644, root, root) before this file in %files section. Some developers does not like macros like "%{__rm}" or "%{__make}". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427662] Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092103.m09L3YQW004611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427662 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj at salstar.sk 2008-01-09 16:03 EST ------- Why cpipe is better like program "pv" already included in Fedora? Do we need both of them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428112] Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092113.m09LDPUo021832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 16:13 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Imported and built for devel and F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428113] Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092113.m09LDQNv021856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-eBay - Perl Interface to XML based eBay API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428113 Bug 428113 depends on bug 428112, which changed state. Bug 428112 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-PrettyPrinter - Generate nice HTML files from HTML syntax trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428112 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428114] Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092113.m09LD3I3006015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-09 16:13 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Imported and built for devel and F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:13:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092113.m09LD44H006039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 Bug 428115 depends on bug 428114, which changed state. Bug 428114 Summary: Review Request: perl-User - API for locating user information regardless of OS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428114 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427380] Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092142.m09LgSoa026221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: efibootmgr - EFI Boot Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427380 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 16:42 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 21:45:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092145.m09Lj5dZ026801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-09 16:45 EST ------- Done all of that I added the link to the gnome bug in the changelog thats the only visual place that it is. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/gnome-themes-extras-2.20-4.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-themes-extras/gnome-themes-extras.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 22:02:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092202.m09M2n1Y013614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-09 17:02 EST ------- The package from comment #22 looks good to me... request cvs when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 22:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:32:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427586] Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092232.m09MWteC019146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kerneloops - Tool to automatically collect and submit kernel crash signatures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427586 cebbert at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_note | |? ------- Additional Comments From cebbert at redhat.com 2008-01-09 17:32 EST ------- This should do for a release note: This package contains the tools to collect kernel crash signatures, and to submit them to the kerneloops.org website where the kernel crash signatures get collected and grouped for presentation to the Linux kernel developers. The information will be used to debug kernel crashes and to see how common they are, allowing kernel developers to concentrate on more severe and common bugs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 9 22:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 17:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427662] Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801092252.m09MqpYO022632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427662 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-09 17:52 EST ------- If the contributor is willing to package cpipe it is fine. It is still useful to point that it is redundant with another package since the contributor may change his mind then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 01:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100101.m0A11JWl010666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-01-09 20:01 EST ------- I've contacted upstream about the: emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/desktop.py 0644 emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/Controller.py 0644 Author said that the Controller.py should be 755 and 644 for desktop.py. About the excessive use of !# line on desktop.py, I've supplied extra info to him for clarification. ----- %lang(ar) %{_datadir}/emesene/po/ar Author told me he'll correct the filename of Arabic l10n files at HEAD. For the location of such files, I'll look into it after the review approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 01:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] New: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/idm-console-framework.spec SRPM URL: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/idm-console-framework-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: A Java management console framework used with Fedora Directory Server and other related identity management projects. rpmlint says "no-documentation" - online help is included with the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100223.m0A2Nbfo003412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-09 21:23 EST ------- [dennis at bratac SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-8-x86_64/result/*rpm fedora-ds-admin.src: W: strange-permission fedora-ds-admin-cvs.sh 0775 fedora-ds-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin looks good owns all its own files and dirs provides and requires looks ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428228] New: Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428228 Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/OpenEXR_Viewers.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/OpenEXR_Viewers-1.0.1-1.kwizart.fc8.src.rpm Description: Viewers programs for OpenEXR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428228] Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100227.m0A2Rpms004054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_Viewers - Viewers programs for OpenEXR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428228 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |403741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100227.m0A2Rpl5004074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428228 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:31:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100231.m0A2V7P2024646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-09 21:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > The upstream name is not right to begin with. I don't know about > a precedent, but I myself ask upstream to change their name when it is > to short or too generic (I did that for g2lib, so far they haven't > acted, but I did what I could). I also made that recommendation for ht. > > But here it is easily done since you are also upstream. The name > of the package is part of the 'quality' of the package and having > a name too generic seems to be to me a good enough reason not to > include it in fedora. There are no precise guidelines about what > makes a package unsuitable for inclusion in fedora (except for license > guidelines), but having a package that abuses the shared > namespaces (package name, library name, binary in /usr/bin name) > is in my opinion a reason sufficient to block a release if upstream is > under the fedora umbrella. > > In any case please try to think at your software name from the > perspective of free software community (other developers and > users) and ask yourself, is my package rightly named? Hi Patrice/Jens, Currently the documentation-devel project is #2 in google's pageranking. Additionally, as requested, here is a link to the project page: https://fedorahosted.org/documentation-devel Based on the google page ranking metric and the provision of additional project documentation for your review, we formally request the preservation of the documentation-devel name for this project. Best regards, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:46:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100246.m0A2k2tp026908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-09 21:46 EST ------- It would be fine to have this fixed for the alpha for F-9... I mean before 15/01/2008 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:46:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100246.m0A2ka2x007070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(axel.thimm at atrpms. | |net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 02:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100251.m0A2pDFD007933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-09 21:51 EST ------- manuel i wait your sign... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100314.m0A3EBKv031383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 22:14 EST ------- I am not sure what will be license for this package. Also some .pm files under Search directory does not seem to use open source license usage allowed. koji build for this package looks good. make test also resulted successful output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:18:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100318.m0A3IjnI011988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-09 22:18 EST ------- I apologize, lots of shit going on so I kinda dropped the ball on this.. BAD: mono-addins.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 7) mono-addins-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized development files for mono-addins mono-addins-devel.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Applications mono-addins-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package Fails to build in mock (fedora-8-i386) due to missing dependency fulfilling autoreconf GOOD: Owns all it's files SPEC is in clean US English MERGH?: Are the --prefix/libdir configure arguments really needed? It's good form to name patches after it's function instead of just the package name (so in this case mono-addins-libdir.patch would be good I suppose). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100342.m0A3gU9A003448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 22:42 EST ------- abd don't forget to remove duplicate line in SPEC %{__install} -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/firstaidkit-plugins/examples -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100343.m0A3hQYf015844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 22:43 EST ------- SRPM please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100341.m0A3fEid015668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 22:41 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. But not for RPM. firstaidkit-devel.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ==>this is ok here. + source files match upstream. 7a4e783e4c95d875cb8b15d2d119dfc6 firstaidkit-0.1.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel and -plugins-all subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: Add some lines of text in SPEC in comments on how to create tarball. Upstream does not provide any direct download links. I am approving this with assuming you will add above comment. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:47:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:47:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100347.m0A3lEqH016593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100346.m0A3kfrE016539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-09 22:46 EST ------- Okay, and now that I'm delirious from fever I feel able to review specs again. BAD: mono-zeroconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized mono-zeroconf namespace mono-zeroconf.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized mono-zeroconf namespace GOOD: SPEC is in clean readable US English Owns all it's files Correct macro use cleans the buildroot in all the right places Builds in mock (fedora-devel-x86_64) Just fix the summaries before checking this in, I'll call it APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100354.m0A3s2NR017527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 22:54 EST ------- 1) You are missing BuildRequires: python-devel 2) use --vendor="Fedora" like --vendor="fedora" 3) you added fedora tag to desktop file that mean your file name will be changed from system-summary.desktop to fedora-system-summary.desktop so correct it under %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 03:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 22:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100354.m0A3sIlG005092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:07:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:07:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100407.m0A47EOk020413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:07 EST ------- also, Change Source URL as provided URL in SPEC is not working. correct one is http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/S/SB/SBURKE/XML-TreeBuilder-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100404.m0A44Ukg019654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:04 EST ------- This package is ready for official review. But as you need sponsor, I can sponsor and review this and other packages from you provided you also review few other new packages waiting for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100408.m0A48bTP007841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 ------- Additional Comments From rainwoodman at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:08 EST ------- I added it to the spec. SPEC URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gnome2-globalmenu-applet-0.3-3.spec SRPM URL: http://gnome2-globalmenu.googlecode.com/files/gnome2-globalmenu-applet-0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427480] Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100412.m0A4C2lc008486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TreeBuilder - Perl parser that builds XML trees https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427480 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:12 EST ------- I see that you have not added %check make test Add above section. But when added "make test" failed. It should not fail and should execute all tests successfully. build.log gave me + make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00about....ok t/10main.....# Failed test 2 in t/10main.t at line 33 # t/10main.t line 33 is: ok $x->same_as($y); FAILED test 2 Failed 1/3 tests, 66.67% okay Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/10main.t 3 1 33.33% 2 Failed 1/2 test scripts, 50.00% okay. 1/6 subtests failed, 83.33% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100437.m0A4bFUD024384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From konrad at tylerc.org 2008-01-09 23:37 EST ------- Many of Fedora's Java packages come either straight or slightly modified from the JPackage RPMs. JPackage had an *extremely* outdated jruby package, which I have borrowed bits from to make this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100434.m0A4YWh9023775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-09 23:34 EST ------- Looks good, you should include the LICENSE file from the tarball as documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100455.m0A4tnmY013938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:55 EST ------- Is this also built for EL-4 and EL-5? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 04:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100456.m0A4upUF014053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-09 23:56 EST ------- Is this built for requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 06:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226236] Merge Review: pciutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100658.m0A6wjEE010610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pciutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226236 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 01:58 EST ------- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 07:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100746.m0A7kUjh005213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 02:46 EST ------- uh sorry c&p error http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/odccm-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 07:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100757.m0A7vXpS006558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-10 02:57 EST ------- Aurelien: I am very sorry to heard that. Unless anyone else wants to, I will take over the package and also try to build the xulrunner version for Fedora 9, though it might take me some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100810.m0A8AxMl008885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From huzaifas at redhat.com 2008-01-10 03:10 EST ------- Lubomir, We are maintaining lightning extension internally in Red Hat, This package is really interesting, Can we take this package over jointly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100816.m0A8GVws021422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100816.m0A8GW8D021446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428237 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:16:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] New: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-gnome-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Display libnotify messages for odccm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100828.m0A8SprF011057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-01-10 03:28 EST ------- Not yet, I've a bumpy week and may not have the time to touch it before the week end. I'm sorry :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100843.m0A8hs1A024932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 03:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. But NOT for RPM. odccm.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/dbus-1/system.d/odccm.conf =>Ok for this package + source files match upstream. ed830920a91573215d2497c09bd5a310 odccm-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + chkconfig scriptlets are used. + Package odccm-0.11-1.fc9 => Provides: config(odccm) = 0.11-1.fc9 Requires: /bin/bash config(odccm) = 0.11-1.fc9 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libdbus-glib-1.so.2 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgnet-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libhal.so.1 libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) librt.so.1 libsynce.so.0 + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100846.m0A8k7Sv013581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 03:46 EST ------- koji build showed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=339002&name=build.log ==> /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:45:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100845.m0A8jaw6025442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:48:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 357661] Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100848.m0A8mu8n025747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sunbird - Mozilla Sunbird Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357661 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak at redhat.com 2008-01-10 03:48 EST ------- Huziafa, yes, I kind of knew that, but this did not come to my mind as I do not use Thunderbird at all. I'd take the formal responsibility to roll srpms for review, apply for cvs and import it, and will gladly accept all improvements, especially in the lightning part and also results of testing. With pkgdb package can have multiple people being in initial bugzilla cc and receiving cvs notifications, and there's no reason for not having cvsextras commits allowed. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 08:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:53:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100853.m0A8rT8I014533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-10 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Currently the documentation-devel project is #2 in google's pageranking. So what? It is not relevant to the shared named space issue. It may mean that, fortunately nobody else did a package with such a generic name. I'd say what I said above since you didn't really took it into account: In any case please try to think at your software name from the perspective of free software community (other developers and users) and ask yourself, is my package rightly named? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100913.m0A9DnTi018623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 04:13 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: odccm Short Description: Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:22:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100922.m0A9MFOx020135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100937.m0A9bga4002045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 04:37 EST ------- Forgot the the minimal build env does not contain python... http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-gnome-0.11-2.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=339072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427162] Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100934.m0A9YbWN001403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sagator - antivir/antispam gateway for smtp server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427162 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-01-10 04:34 EST ------- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100943.m0A9hZl5002931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-10 04:43 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: diveintopython Short Description: A python programming guide Owners: mwiriadi Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: mwiriadi Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100956.m0A9uUTN025385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail.ru 2008-01-10 04:56 EST ------- Yes, it is same as my changed script except that I've used "-1" instead of "-n 1" :) Otherwise, it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 09:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801100954.m0A9srFe024792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 04:54 EST ------- Packaging looks ok. rpmlint is silent. koji build successful. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 10:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:03:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101003.m0AA3Ljr026722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 05:03 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synce-gnome Short Description: Display libnotify messages for odccm Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 10:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101020.m0AAKZEf010047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 ------- Additional Comments From tuju at iki.fi 2008-01-10 05:20 EST ------- Speaking of targets, hopefully this will see daylight in f8 too as f9 is still quite far away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 10:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101025.m0AAPfcE010991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 10:25:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101025.m0AAPQgN010951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-01-10 05:25 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291261) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291261&action=view) patch to compile with g++ 4.3.0 $ rpmlint rudecgi-5.0.0-1.src.rpm rudecgi.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 67) rudecgi.src: W: invalid-license GPL GPLv2+ is the licence according to your source code. Minor issues => EasyFix. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 11:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:09:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101109.m0AB9Ynj004475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 06:09 EST ------- any timeline for releasing bouncycastle >= 1.38? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 11:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101110.m0ABATAd004959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 06:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > any timeline for releasing bouncycastle >= 1.38? sorry its already in rawhide. I checked on F-8 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 11:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101108.m0AB8db8004415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 06:08 EST ------- Should add gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlet http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda Any reason for not adding doc directory to %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 11:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101145.m0ABjSan022256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-01-10 06:45 EST ------- I'm doing an unofficial review of your package: 1. License 'GPL' is obsolete. Please refer http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing 2. Group 'Sound and Video' is non standard 3. Please build the SRPM as root, it complains 'user hellork' doesn't exists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 11:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] New: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview-0.1.7-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Gpicview is an image viewer that is: Extremely lightweight and fast with low memory usage Very suitable for default image viewer of desktop system Simple and intuitive interface Minimal lib dependency: Only pure GTK+ is used Desktop independent: Doesn't require any specific desktop environment RPM Lint: On RPM file [marc at Strike-Lap i386]$ rpmlint gpicview-0.1.7-1.fc8.i386.rpm gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/README gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/NEWS gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/TODO gpicview.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gpicview-0.1.7/ChangeLog gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo gpicview.i386: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/gpicview.mo On SRPM: Nothing Only issue I have thats severe is the *.mo files and I'm not to sure how to fix it. I can compile it in F-8 yet mock building it in devel doesn't build claiming that the *mo files do not exist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 12:00:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226236] Merge Review: pciutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101200.m0AC0drF024460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pciutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226236 harald at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(harald at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From harald at redhat.com 2008-01-10 07:00 EST ------- fixed in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 12:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:09:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101209.m0AC9iLj025645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 07:09 EST ------- 1) You are not using http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-8c605ebf8330f6d505f384e671986fa99a8f72ee 2) remove .mo from %files 3) add gettext as BR 4) you don't need pkgconfig as BR 5) remove empty files README NEWS TODO Changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 12:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101224.m0ACO4lQ027579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-01-10 07:24 EST ------- Here's another one - Build failure with "Checking for xmms-config...no" I guess you need to add xmms-devel to the 'BuildRequires' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 12:48:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101248.m0ACmDN5019173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-10 07:48 EST ------- Fixed. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview-0.1.7-2.fc8.src.rpm Thanks for the link I had read it but missed that part I've bookmarked it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 12:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101257.m0ACv0H6000455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-10 07:56 EST ------- The problem with src/mapm/mapm_mt.cpp is a little more complicated. It is a wrapper around MAPM library originally written by Martin Pfingstl. XQilla uses MAPM library version 4.6.1, which did not include mapm_mt.cpp (it was distributed separately). At some point mapm_mt.cpp got included into MAPM library and now the new MAPM license applies to mapm_mt.cpp too. I have a written permission of the MAPM library author to distribute mapm version 4.6.1 under a new license, but I don't think it applies to mapm_mt.cpp (the one that is part of xqilla sources). I removed src/mapm/mapm_mt.cpp from the original xqilla source tarball and included mapm_mt.c (modified) from last upstream version of mapm into the source rpm. I can try to iron this problem out with the xqilla upstream, but hopefully my solution could work in the meantime. Source rpm + spec file: * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/xqilla/xqilla-2.0.0-1.fc8.src.rpm * http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xzazriv/xqilla/xqilla.spec Scratch builds: * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=339227 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=339228 * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=339229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 13:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:14:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101314.m0ADEYtW003254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-10 08:14 EST ------- Yes, its built for all active branches. Closing out ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 13:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226319] Merge Review: procps In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101335.m0ADZhhW026669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: procps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226319 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2008-01-10 08:35 EST ------- * The files in the source tarball use the LGPLv2+ not just the GPLv2+. * There's no reason why the %post scriptlet is not simply %post -p /sbin/ldconfig * From the build.log: /usr/bin/strip: unable to copy file '/home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/procps-3.2.7-17.fc8-root-qa/lib/libproc-3.2.7.so' reason: Permission denied That is because the lib is installed u-w and only later gets attr(0755,...). Easy to fix at end of %install section. * When you use "install" in the spec or modify the install options, prefer "install -p ..." to preserve file timestamps. Users appreciate it when the age of files in packages can be seen, and e.g. documentation from several years ago does not get a fresh timestamp as if it were new. This is easy to fix in the make install line. * All these can be fixed in CVS. Hence: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 13:55:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101355.m0ADt4tV029330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 08:55 EST ------- Couple of issues: 1. minor, but unpleasant for reviewers: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ wget http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.spec --15:24:14-- http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/4-fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.spec => `themonospot-0.6.5.spec' Resolving www.integrazioneweb.com... 151.13.66.154, 83.103.22.154 Connecting to www.integrazioneweb.com|151.13.66.154|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 15:24:25 ERROR 404: Not Found. 2. mock build problems: build fails with Processing files: themonospot-0.6.5-4 error: File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/English.lf error: File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf Processing files: themonospot-debuginfo-0.6.5-4 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/English.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/themonospot-base.dll RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/English.lf File not found: /var/tmp/themonospot-0.6.5-buildroot/usr/lib64/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/English.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/languages/Italiano.lf /usr/lib/themonospot/themonospot-base.dll 3. src.rpm issues: Needs work: * Source themonospot-0.6.5.tar.gz is different from upstream (and this usually is a show stoppper) * BuildRoot should be one of those listed in the wiki at Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot. The difference is minor compared to an accepted one, so please change it. * Specfile should be in the format %{name}.spec (see Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) Incidentally, are you already sponsored? I could not find you in FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 13:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 08:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416461] Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101358.m0ADw8bB029613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmms-pulse - XMMS output plugin for the PulseAudio sound server. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 08:58 EST ------- The user which builds the srpm has no importance at all. mock builds as the user running it. Using root for rpmbuild-ing is strongly discouraged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 14:06:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101406.m0AE64F3031388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-10 09:06 EST ------- - i must adjust files on repository - i must upload tarball in same web dir and change in spec file the link - i must change BuildRoot it's right ? What is FAS ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 14:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101417.m0AEH10N000445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 09:17 EST ------- You have to include in the src.rpm the exact same tarball as available upstream. The BuildRoot should be one of the three values recommended in the wiki page. The .spec included in src.rpm (note that it could be different from the one included in the tar! ) must be named themonosport.spec FAS == Fedora Account System ( https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 14:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101451.m0AEpPaK005404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-10 09:51 EST ------- All looks good, so this package is: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101509.m0AF9Nqo008273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-10 10:09 EST ------- FAS == Fedora Account System Registred as hman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101514.m0AFEU73009274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-10 10:14 EST ------- Please replace ---------------------------------------------------- make -j ---------------------------------------------------- with ---------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} ---------------------------------------------------- (per packaging guidelines). Other things are okay. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (xqilla) is APPROVED by me ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101519.m0AFJaLF010166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jwulf at redhat.com 2008-01-10 10:19 EST ------- Hey guys, I've been following the conversation on this package. I've been using it on Fedora for the past year and a half. A couple of things: 1) Open sourcing this package and contributing it to Fedora will be of great benefit for the state of Fedora documentation. Basically this is the toolchain that is used to produce RHEL and JBoss documentation. It is a mature project with a significant existing community of users, who have it embedded in their enterprise infrastructure. Changing the name is not a trivial exercise - the impact is quite high, and open source projects, even commercial ones, are not known for having resources to spare. This isn't in itself a reason to retain the name in Fedora, but it gives some context to jfearn's concern. 2) In terms of the suitability of the name for the package - I agree that what we're looking at here is a canonical name - like "kernel" or "NetworkManager". I think that we can make a case for this package to have the canonical name. There is a missing infrastructure piece for development of documentation for open source software. The fact that this name space is vacant apart from this package indicates the necessity of such a piece. It also indicates that this package speaks strongly to this need, perhaps sufficiently now to answer it, perhaps with some further work. At the very least it is a significant starting point. The package brings together an end-to-end opensource toolchain that allows open source projects to produce professional documentation, taking several forms of input and outputting html, pdf, manpages, xml, and several other formats. It produces branded documentation using templates. It handles multiple language translations. It's been developed over a number of years and is used in an enterprise setting. Basically it provides the whole kit and caboodle for professional open source documentation production from source. In terms of Fedora it provides a missing infrastructure piece for documentation production and translations. In terms of the wider scene it provides a missing infrastructure piece, and so I think that a canonical name is not out of place. Red Hat / Fedora have a history of providing significant plumbing pieces to the community (like NetworkManager). I think we have a good case for retaining the canonical name, because with this package we have a good, clear shot at the title. Take a look at what it can do, how extensible it is, and where it fits into an existing gap in the infrastructure scene, and see what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101523.m0AFNh9d010915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 mzazrivec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mzazrivec at redhat.com 2008-01-10 10:23 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xqilla Short Description: XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C Owners: mzazrive Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:31:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101531.m0AFVCjO012579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 10:31 EST ------- Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:30:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101530.m0AFU2NB024970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-10 10:30 EST ------- In the buildlog http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=337551&name=build.log the following line appears: + ./configure --build=ppc-redhat-linux-gnu --host=ppc-redhat-linux-gnu ... Does this mean that the tests are being run on a Power PC. The cppad test suite assume that DPL_EPSILON is about 1e-14 or smaller, but perhaps this is not the case. I am considering writing a spec files change with the purpose of printing out the value of DBL_EPSILON on the target machine. Is this how people normally proceed in a case like this (because one cannot expect to log into the machine and run the code in the debugger) ? P.S. I think that I have to access koji from one of my personal machines; I plan to try it with this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:37:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101537.m0AFbVtY013830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101540.m0AFeRs5014769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 10:40 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-ds-admin Short Description: Management server for Fedora Directory Server Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:39:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101539.m0AFd3of014113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-10 10:39 EST ------- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (postgresql-plruby) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101546.m0AFkfXc015740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 10:46 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291293) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291293&action=view) fixed spec the release was bumped by adding a digit after the %dist tag, so that you can go own with your own numbering scheme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:48:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101548.m0AFmHYc015881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 10:48 EST ------- s/go own/go on/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 15:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:54:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101554.m0AFswut016667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-10 10:54 EST ------- No problem, if you find a reviewer who accepts this name, then fine. I still find that it is a bad name. Saying that there are other names that are badly chosen won't change that. This one especially badly chosen, moreover, in the context of fedora since -devel is consistently used for sub packages headers and .so files used for linking. But, hey that's just my advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:07:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101607.m0AG7MFf031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 ------- Additional Comments From buytenh at wantstofly.org 2008-01-10 11:07 EST ------- Thank you for the review. I have uploaded 0.50-2 (which incorporates all your review comments) to: http://www.wantstofly.org/~buytenh/fedora-packages/dropbear-0.50-2.src.rpm I hope I've fixed everything in this version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:06:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101606.m0AG6ggN031624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:06 EST ------- Yes, that means a ppc machine was picked out of the build pool to build this (since it's noarch). Is it really noarch though? I see it calling g++? I have a ppc32 machine here running rawhide you are welcome to use to test... just drop me a ssh key in an email and I will add you an account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101611.m0AGBcxm032496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 11:11 EST ------- Good to have this discussed on fedora-devel then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: vixie-cron-ng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101624.m0AGOJIK001518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: vixie-cron-ng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2008-01-10 11:24 EST ------- CHECK: - pkg name possibly in conflict with 3rd clause of BSD license (no promotion or endorsement with contributor names) -- search for alternative name is in progress - rpmlint checks return: vixie-cron-ng.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides vixie-cron --> Possibly change that to "Provides: vixie-cron = 4:4.3" (or whatever else vixie-cron version this package replaces, just be sure to list the epoch as well) vixie-cron-ng.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 80, tab: line 92) --> use either spaces or tabs consistently for indentation, not both - license text not in %doc, possibly add AUTHORS, CHANGES, README as well - source matches upstream, but the URL is incorrect. Because the tarball is attached to a Trac wiki page, "?format=raw" is needed to actually download the tarball. Perhaps add a comment with points to the real URL (as changing the "Source: ..." line won't work with koji, it can't handle CGI parameters) - possibly unnecessary "BR: automake", you don't use it anywhere in the spec file - macro use inconsistent: use '%{_initrddir}' instead of '%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d' in the spec file - what purpose does "make ... RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DLINT -Dlint" have? - %postun mustn't fail (append " || :" like in %preun) - "make install" does much too few which you workaround in the spec file by creating directories, copying/moving stuff to the directories, I can help with automake/autofoo if you wish so "make install" just works (possibly followup issues of the last one: - no need to use %attr() for all the files if "make install" just does "the right thing" - don't move files out of the source/build directory as it breaks "rpm -bi --short-circuit", just copy them, or better let them be installed with "make install" - instead of renaming %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/crond.pam to .../crond, just let "make install" do the right thing (i.e. install the file as "crond", not "crond.pam") ) GOOD: - package meets Fedora naming guidelines - license (BSD and MIT) OK, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101638.m0AGcWJO003839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:38 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:35:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101635.m0AGZkXX003544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:35 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101640.m0AGeqFk024107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:40 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101640.m0AGeYCa024035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 11:40 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/idm-console-framework.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/idm-console-framework-1.1.1-1.src.rpm This version builds with mock, and rpmlint reports nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101641.m0AGfQU4004667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-01-10 11:41 EST ------- Please could I have an EPEL branch for emacs-nxml-mode? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:47:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101647.m0AGlSTJ025002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:46:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:46:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101646.m0AGkFrK005483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:46 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 16:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101649.m0AGnQJc005700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-10 11:49 EST ------- For EL-4? EL-5? or both? Please use the template at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Please reset the fedora-cvs flag when you answer... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 17:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:20:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101720.m0AHKUXK013829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 twaugh at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From twaugh at redhat.com 2008-01-10 12:20 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: emacs-nxml-mode New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 17:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101732.m0AHWqel032433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-10 12:32 EST ------- cppad is a library of C++ include files. The rpmbuild command is set to run a set of the tests. These tests are intended to make sure that cppad is functioning properly on the target machine. While the rpm and distributed files do not depend on the architecture, the test results do. I thought that, in the noarch case, koji ran the rpmbuild on multiple machines to see that all the tests passed. Perhaps I was mistaken in this. I plan to add printing of DBL_EPSILON during the first test, just to make sure of its value. If the test fails, and the value of DBL_EPSILON does not explain it, I will try Kevin's offer in comment #45. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 17:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101748.m0AHmkeE018476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-10 12:48 EST ------- builds in mock Looks good to me approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 17:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101753.m0AHrp7s003018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 12:53 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: idm-console-framework Short Description: Core Java console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi mharmsen Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 18:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101820.m0AIKg4r007885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-10 13:20 EST ------- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 18:30:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101830.m0AIU1Gw009006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-10 13:30 EST ------- had an issue with cvs Packages which had errors: idm-console-framework: Unable to save all information for idm-console-framework: mharmsen must be in one of these groups: ('cvsextras', 'packager', 'cvsadmin') to hold the approveacls acl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 18:36:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101836.m0AIafs5010133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 13:36 EST ------- Ok. Just omit mharmsen from the list for now. I will add him later. I think he's still getting all of his Fedora accounts stuff set up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 18:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428226] Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101837.m0AIbNJu010193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idm-console-framework: Core console package used by Fedora Directory Server and other IDM projects Alias: idm-console-frmwrk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428226 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 13:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291309) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291309&action=view) cvs commit log for dirsec console -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 18:35:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:35:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249548] Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801101835.m0AIZGLI026792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-admin - Administration server used by Fedora Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249548 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 13:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291308) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291308&action=view) cvs commit log for dirsec adminserver -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 20:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102048.m0AKmsbd016842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-10 15:48 EST ------- This package is in Fedora but ownership has been dropped I submitted this as a new review originally because of the time and version numbers. Should I just add myself as a maintainer and just do an update? Do I have to fill out the cvs form to add myself as a maintainer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 20:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102053.m0AKrAcF017694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-10 15:53 EST ------- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-themes-extras Updated Fedora Owners: mwiriadi New Branches: F-8 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102118.m0ALIqtm005224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-01-10 16:18 EST ------- http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/portecle.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/portecle-1.3-2.fc8.src.rpm * Thu Jan 10 2008 Ville Skytt? - 1.3-2 - Update GTK icon cache in post(un)install scriptlets (#425834). Good catch, thanks. Stuff in doc/ is not included as %doc because practically all of it is online help which is already packaged inside the jar and accessible through Portecle's "Help" menu. I don't have that strong opinions about it though; if you think it's better to include a second copy of the whole docs set as %doc, I can add it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102126.m0ALQXHM006582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-10 16:26 EST ------- I am upstream, so I would have preferred not to be the maintainer, but since nobody submit it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:25:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] New: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/halevt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpm/halevt-0.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Halevt (HAL events manager) is a daemon that executes arbitrary commands when a device with certain properties is added to the system and when device properties change. Halevt uses HAL to monitor the state of your system's hardware. With the default config file, it can handle the mounting of media as they are inserted/attached to the system. Halevt comes with halevt-mount a program able to use HAL to mount, umount devices and keep a list of devices handled by halevt-mount. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102133.m0ALXauq024143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-10 16:33 EST ------- The update is in and building it using mock is fine for devel now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:42:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 209522] Review Request: libsmi - A library to access SMI MIB information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102142.m0ALgtAW009093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libsmi - A library to access SMI MIB information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209522 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide skasal at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From skasal at redhat.com 2008-01-10 16:42 EST ------- I believe this should have fedora-review flag set to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 21:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102155.m0ALtYCa011192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 16:55 EST ------- Sometimes (many times actually) I prefer to read the docs from a browser or using less without starting the application. Maybe a portecle-docs including just the docs, which can be installed by those like me who want the docs and don't care about the space on disk would be suited here? Plus a short polite note (in %desc for instance) "the docs are also available in a separate package, use yum install blablah to install them". And I would not impose any requires between the base and the -docs package, since they would be quite independent of each other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 22:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426885] Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102216.m0AMGeHD031313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 17:16 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 22:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102216.m0AMGebk031341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 Bug 428237 depends on bug 426885, which changed state. Bug 426885 Summary: Review Request: odccm - Connection daemon for Pocket PC devices for Windows Mobile 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426885 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 22:35:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:35:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102235.m0AMZ0tq017434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net 2008-01-10 17:34 EST ------- Care to add an entry to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/Pipeline#packaged so people see Tiresias is done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:07:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428237] Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102307.m0AN799D022490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnome - Display libnotify messages for odccm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428237 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-10 18:07 EST ------- Also thanks for this review :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:34:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102334.m0ANYFXP026494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crobinso at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2008-01-10 18:34 EST ------- Cole, could you take care of the above spec changes so we can get the review finished ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102334.m0ANYl6Y026543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide dlutter at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |crobinso at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From dlutter at redhat.com 2008-01-10 18:34 EST ------- Cole, could you take care of the above spec changes so we can get the review finished ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428352] Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102351.m0ANp5hg029729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-idm-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 rmeggins at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: fedora-idm- |Review Request: fedora-idm- |console: |console: Fedora branded Java | |console for Fedora Directory | |Server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:50:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428352] New: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-idm-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: This provides the Fedora branded console for use with idm-console-framework for Fedora Directory Server. Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64. rpmlint says "E: no-binary". This will require a bit of explanation: There appears to be a bug in Java. The default Java java.library.path uses /usr/lib even on 64bit systems. This means that if the app uses JNI, it will not find the 64-bit libs by default. The argument -Djava.library.path=%{_libdir} must be passed to the JRE. This means the package becomes an arch specific package, even though there are no arch specific binaries in the package. This appears to be a bug in Sun Java, IBM Java, and in IcedTea Java. So I would like to propose that this particular rpmlint error be waived for the fedora package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:00:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428352] Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110000.m0B00Sds031299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-idm-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins at redhat.com 2008-01-10 19:00 EST ------- e.g. see http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6312057 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 10 23:59:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801102359.m0ANxUbp030718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-10 18:59 EST ------- There is a typo in the src.rpm link above (fc-srpm instead of fc-srpms)... Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on:devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: no output Binary halevt: halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/run/halevt halevt halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /var/run/halevt halevt halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/halevt 0750 halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/halevt halevt halevt.x86_64: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/halevt halevt --> all are normal given that it runs under its own user + security restrictions [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, co ntaining the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: a51618512edaa8dd1e3cf347c6376c5ddbda86e6 halevt-0.0.7.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions sectio n of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. I wonder if the file named ChangeLog should not be packaged, too ? I'll trust your judgement, since you are also upstream. I'll try to test the program tomorrow and come back with the rest of the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:12:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428357] New: Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428357 Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for Managing Fedora Directory Server. Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64. rpmlint says nothing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110033.m0B0XVMQ019450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-10 19:33 EST ------- As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay this review. It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] New: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-sync-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-sync-engine-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Synce synchronization engine for use with libopensync. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:35:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] New: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/pywbxml.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/pywbxml-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Python wrapper for wbxml2 Needs latest wbxml2 (0.9.2-10.fc9) with synce patches to build (should be in next rawhide push or see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=340408) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110036.m0B0abJR020037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427526, 428360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110036.m0B0ac21020079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428361 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 00:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110036.m0B0abfl020059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428361 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 01:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110114.m0B1E3e8024954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-10 20:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for > docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay > this review. This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than many source packages currently in Fedora. see: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/ > It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list. I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of time. I'll see if I can convince the manager in question to reconsider this push. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 01:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428364] New: Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 Summary: Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-admin-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-admin-console-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for Managing Fedora Directory Server. Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64. rpmlint says nothing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 01:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110155.m0B1tpCU014583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 01:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110155.m0B1t9cE014436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-10 20:55 EST ------- > This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than > many source packages currently in Fedora. I see, ok - I think I overestimated the size going by its inflated size (36MB). Generally it would be better to use a system package rather than carrying your own copy of it, but if it is really necessary perhaps an exception can be made for now since at least it is not a binary library. > I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of > time. Well it may seem so to people outside the fedora packaging project, but making an OS is a serious business. With over 5000 packages currently in the distro we need some rules and conventions to prevent pollution of the namespaces. Learning and accepting those conventions is a requisite to joining and working with the project. However I point out that no final decision on the name has been made yet, it is still under discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 01:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110158.m0B1w86p014743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 02:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110204.m0B24Mh1015937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 21:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for > > docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay > > this review. > > This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than > many source packages currently in Fedora. > > see: > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/ > > > It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list. > > I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of > time. I'll see if I can convince the manager in question to reconsider this push. > I don't think so. If people will start thinking and implementing their own packaging guidelines then we don't need any policies/committees to discuss any issues in fedora. Saying so I think question has been raised on fedora's work, its policies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 02:06:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110206.m0B26fFV032211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: virt-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226528 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-01-10 21:06 EST ------- These fixes will be in the new rawhide build virt-manager-0_5_3-1_fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 02:06:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226348] Merge Review: python-virtinst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110206.m0B26CTQ032167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226348 berrange at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From berrange at redhat.com 2008-01-10 21:06 EST ------- These fixes will be in the new rawhide build python-virtinst-0_300_2-1_fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 02:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110248.m0B2mBXi021568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-10 21:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > As per comment 11, I strongly recommend creating a separate package for > > docbook-xsl and making this review depend on it so as not to further delay > > this review. > > This package is dependent on this exact version of the xsl and is smaller than > many source packages currently in Fedora. > > see: > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/ > > > It may be worth raising the naming issue on fedora-packaging list. > > I think that whole discussion is ridiculous, pointless and a complete waste of > time. I'll see if I can convince the manager in question to reconsider this push. > Hey, Jeff. It's cool. We'll get it sorted out. I really appreciate everything you have done for open-source in the last 3 years. You have created a toolchain that has enabled the 48 folks using it to generate more open-source content than any other project in the history of open-source. You have done things that no-one else has done and you did so without ever drawing attention to yourself and your immense contributions. There are a 179 make files that need to be edited and 4117 documentation sets in 23 languages that need to be recompiled. I know it is non-trivial and a world of work to re-do 2 years worth of work in 2 days. Let me check the community of use around the documentation-devel package and see what their thougths are on taking this burden completely on themselves to redo. Thank you again, Jeff and apologies to the Jens/Patrice/Parang for the distraction. Honestly had no idea the impact this name would have on fedora. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 03:18:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:18:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110318.m0B3IbUH009636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mmcallis at redhat.com 2008-01-10 22:18 EST ------- I think this is a tribute to how great Jeff's package actually is. No one is complaining that 'the package does not do this', or 'if I run this command it breaks everything', no, people are just complaining about the name. If this happens everytime someone wants to push a package into Fedora, then it's a good thing Red Hat does not, and never will, control open source, otherwise nothing would ever be released, and everyone would debate package names all day :( Not that it matters what I think, but I think if it was pushed into Fedora, then a few people would start using it and see how great it is, the word would spread, and no one could care what the name is. If documentation-devel is such a horrible name, run "rpm -qa" and see what else is allowed. Thanks, Murray. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 03:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110323.m0B3NJWK026843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 afitzsim at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |afitzsim at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From afitzsim at redhat.com 2008-01-10 22:23 EST ------- I do not find the naming dilemma to be an issue. Given the google juice the phrase documentation devel already has and the specialized nature of the package, any name will work. This is a tool Intended for technical documentation developers (not first time FOSS users) so we really have no blocking need to specify a brandable project name. That said, I would have supported renaming had it been a trivial move, but I see it will not cause great enough a confusion to warrant its non-inclusion from F9 on this grounds. What would greatly disappoint, is not getting this package into Fedora 9. documentation-devel could greatly serve the content community by bringing a quality publishing tool to books for many free software projects. I know both inkscape and gimp documentation certainly need the improvements this package can offer. The name space is free, the tool is useful lets get this innovation to the fedora community ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 03:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110338.m0B3c7Il029039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From irooskov at redhat.com 2008-01-10 22:38 EST ------- Personally I, like everyone else here, believes that this package will be a great asset to the open-source community and that in the end the name (though I understand and respect convention) probably isn't going to be the largest concern. It's a tool for creating and developing professional documentation and if the name at the moment isn't considered fitting then I propose that the name should be simple and clearly relate to the product. DocCommander, DocTools, something simple and easy to remember. The most important thing I can see though is to actaully release the package into the open source community so as long as it gets there, sooner rather than later, the name doesn't seem that important to me personally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 03:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110353.m0B3rEu3015139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-10 22:53 EST ------- > If this happens everytime someone wants to push a package into Fedora, This is a gross misrepresentation of reality. The vast majority of package reviews go through without the need to consult a committee for clarification or advice. > What would greatly disappoint, is not getting this package into Fedora 9. Nobody is disputing this fact. Furthermore, it would likely be easy to get it into F8 immediately after review approval too. Have you considered the possibility that this desired name really is problematic for the global community namespace? It especially feels wrong to me because it clashes with the long established convention of *-devel for library header packages. We have always tried to avoid requiring any *-devel package for non-development (usually meaning building binaries) operation. I understand the desire to keep the name used internally for years, but is it really such a huge burden to choose a different name? My personal opinion: *anything* that isn't *-devel is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 03:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110358.m0B3wscp032366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From daobrien at redhat.com 2008-01-10 22:58 EST ------- I don't see the name as a huge issue either. Admittedly I've been bitten by oddly named packages in the past, but I just learn and continue. Given the traction that this package has already, and the effort required to rename it, I suggest leaving it as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110409.m0B49DGh001894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From ccheng at redhat.com 2008-01-10 23:09 EST ------- As long as it works, the name is not an issue to me at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:14:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:14:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110414.m0B4E0di002585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-10 23:13 EST ------- As discussed on IRC with Warren, good to name this package as DocumentationKit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428369] New: Review Request: nec2c - a translation of the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC2) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428369 Summary: Review Request: nec2c - a translation of the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC2) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sconklin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://hams.bobjensen.com/SPECS/nec2c.spec SRPM URL: http://hams.bobjensen.com/SRPMS/nec2c-0.6-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: nec2c is a translation of the Numerical Electromagnetics Code (NEC2) from FORTRAN to C. Operationally nec2c differs from NEC2 by being a command line non-interactive program, taking as arguments the input file name and optionally the output file name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] New: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dennis at ausil.us,fedora-package- review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/fedora-ds-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Builds in mock, both f-8 i386 and x86_64. rpmlint says E: no-binary. This is a meta-package, the purpose of which is to simply provide Requires to pull in the other components (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin, console packages) of the Fedora Directory Server. It only contains the LICENSE file, in the %doc directory. The reason why it has an arch is so that it will pull in the correct architecture of the other packages such as fedora-ds-base which are architecture specific. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110437.m0B4bJta021440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-10 23:37 EST ------- *-devel is treated special in a few ways: - It is *wrong* for runtime packages to depend on *-devel packages. *-devel packages are for We fix bugs like that in the distro all the time. - rpmdev-rmdevelrpms attempts to remove *-devel for this purpose. - *-devel is special in that it is assumed to be multilib by the repository creation tools. Is it really a huge amount of effort to rename it? Is simple string search and replace to a new name really such a huge burden? I suggested DocumentationKit as a possible good name. It satisfies both the *-devel problem and "documentation" genericness namespace issue, and it goes along with the other StudyCaps names ending in *Kit. Perhaps you could think of a better name. But PLEASE don't use *-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:43:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110443.m0B4hC9x022247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From lbrindle at redhat.com 2008-01-10 23:43 EST ------- The main arguments against documentation-devel seem to be that it is "too generic" and doesn't fit existing convention. Being "too generic" is not, in this case, necessarily a bad thing. Documentation-devel is a very broad tool. Not only is it broad now, but it has the capacity to become even broader. The name is certainly canonical, as jwulf stated, but so it should be - no other tool exists that is like it (afaik). Convention is rather a loose term - particularly in FOSS. The existing documentation on what is considered 'conventional' varies greatly from project to project and, as mentioned by jens peterson in comment #10 "our package naming guidelines ... were vague on this case." With that in mind, documentation-devel is a set of tools for the development of documentation - this seems logical to me. Add to this the fact that the name is not being used, the fact that the name is commonly known in the society (evidenced by the Google ranking) and the fact that it has been used under this name for a lengthy period of time. Having a 'too generic' name could impact some users, most though would search on the term 'Documentation' and, through great Google rankings, will find the tool they're after. Changing the name at this stage *will* negatively impact a large body of users. From a cost/benefit perspective, having a 'too generic' name is a small price to pay. Perhaps we should be concentrating on the tool and not the name. It is a fantastic tool that I have been using for nearly six months now, and from the feedback I have had there is a definite need for it to be released to the wider community. We all owe a debt of gratitude to jfearn, not the injustice of squabbling over the name of the thing. The principal of FOSS is that we all get to take part in the development and use of tools that simply wouldn't be available otherwise. Why are we getting hung up because a name is "too generic"? The tool works, and the community want it. Let's concentrate on getting it out there and we can bicker over it later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 04:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110456.m0B4u70L007777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-10 23:56 EST ------- Convention to me is even a bigger reason than genericness. As described above there are REAL technical reasons why the *-devel convention makes this a very poor package name. I personally don't care about the genericness part. I do care about the *-devel convention. Please choose anything else. Furthermore, I have yet to see a legitimate reason why renaming this package would be such a burden beyond the emotional desire to keep it only because it was named such internally in the past. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110500.m0B50HTA024419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-11 00:00 EST ------- Honestly I don't understand why the changes you made would have fixed the documentation, but although I still see a load of latex errors during the build, the resulting pdf files look better to me. So everything looks good to me now, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:15:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426103] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110515.m0B5FiWn010582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wiimote - Xorg input driver for the Wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426103 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-11 00:15 EST ------- For some reason I couldn't convince mock to pull the fixed libwiimote package from my local repo so I just took the lazy way out and waited until it hit rawhide. Builds fine and rpmlint only says xorg-x11-drv-wiimote.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 10) which I don't particularly care about. * source files match upstream: 40237e4539af81ab9c18e967454bf72e797b30264541e79116220d120d7ed09a xf86-input-wiimote-0.0.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: wiimote_drv.so()(64bit) xorg-x11-drv-wiimote = 0.0.1-1.fc9 = libcwiimote.so.0()(64bit) xorg-x11-server-Xorg * %check is not present; I can't really test this, as I have the wiimote but not the bluetooth. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * doesn't create or own any directories * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 223023] Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110529.m0B5TqaU027971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nxml-mode - Emacs package for editing XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=223023 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 00:29 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110533.m0B5X2NJ028616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226054, which changed state. Bug 226054 Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226054] Merge Review: libuser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110533.m0B5X1IW028583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libuser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226054 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-11 00:33 EST ------- Looks quite clean now. I'd say we're done. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:32:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:32:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110532.m0B5Wl7o028553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 00:32 EST ------- Looks like it's still owned in devel... You can go to: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gnome-themes-extras and take ownership of the F-8 branch and ask for ownership of the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 403911] Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110544.m0B5ikXI013799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(rajeeshknambiar at gm| |ail.com) | ------- Additional Comments From rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com 2008-01-11 00:44 EST ------- Parag, I've started unofficially reviewing packages, here goes the first one : #416461 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416461 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110551.m0B5pMTc014865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-11 00:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #29) > Looks like it's still owned in devel... > > You can go to: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gnome-themes-extras > > and take ownership of the F-8 branch and ask for ownership of the devel branch. But there isn't an F-8 branch there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 05:51:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:51:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110551.m0B5pfQk031213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110606.m0B66L8A017175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-11 01:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #30) > *-devel is treated special in a few ways: > > - It is *wrong* for runtime packages to depend on *-devel packages. *-devel > packages are for We fix bugs like that in the distro all the time. I think I understand the point of view. This documentation-devel package is used to development documentation rpms. In that sense, documentation-devel is not the runtime, but contains the files needed for you to develop the resulting runtime (documentation). Whether it is developing code or words, it is all poetry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110619.m0B6J5t4018554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From irooskov at redhat.com 2008-01-11 01:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) >Whether it is developing code or words, it is all poetry. > Ah poetry, is there anything more beautiful? Anyway, I understand the POV that you're coming from and in that sense it is nice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110618.m0B6IGf4018494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 01:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291354) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291354&action=view) Some Cleanups to SPEC I did some changes to description, desktop-file-install command. Use this SPEC and provide new update for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110648.m0B6miiu022795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |412081 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110651.m0B6pXci023356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 alexl at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-11 01:51 EST ------- Matthias: would you be willing to orphan the devel branch so that Marc can maintain the entire package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 06:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110648.m0B6mSPX022752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-11 01:48 EST ------- I had sed on the pdf file... I think that was the difference. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-qvalue Short Description: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control Owners: pingou Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 07:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110735.m0B7ZLNG029896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-01-11 02:35 EST ------- Even if packages are used for development, they cannot end with "-devel". It is called gcc and not gcc-devel for example. Besides they are numerous occasions where a package that ends with "-devel" is excluded. A few examples http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/8/FinalTreeTesting "Make sure default install doesn't include -devel packages" Look at the default kickstart files that are used to generate the GNOME and KDE live images. They automatically exclude *-devel. In short any package that ends with -devel is assumed to contain development files (headers et all) and not development tools in various places throughout Fedora and making an exception just for this package is unwieldy. You just have to call it something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 08:57:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 03:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292121] Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110857.m0B8vV2V008990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boxes - Draw any kind of box around some given text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292121 jhrozek at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jhrozek at redhat.com 2008-01-11 03:57 EST ------- Built for rawhide - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=30902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110914.m0B9EL8Z027658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 04:14 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b7f70dc41687d920ec9f47c01f56d6ce librtfcomp-1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel,-python subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package librtfcomp-1.1-1.fc9 -> Provides: librtfcomp.so.0 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) librtfcomp.so.0 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package librtfcomp-devel-1.1-1.fc9 -> Requires: Pyrex librtfcomp = 1.1-1.fc9 librtfcomp.so.0 python-devel + Package librtfcomp-python-1.1-1.fc9 -> Provides: pyrtfcomp.so + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. SHOULD: License is LGPLv2+ from LICENSE file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:21:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:21:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110921.m0B9Lg53029142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-11 04:21 EST ------- Done http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gpicview/gpicview-0.1.7-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110926.m0B9QICA014494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 04:26 EST ------- This is merge-review where maintainer should be assumed to be capable of solving simple packaging issues and not required to ask reviewer to give patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226080] Merge Review: libXmu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110926.m0B9QNSI014514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXmu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226080 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 04:26 EST ------- This is merge-review where maintainer should be assumed to be capable of solving simple packaging issues and not required to ask reviewer to give patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110925.m0B9Pnjo029782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 04:25 EST ------- This is merge-review where maintainer should be assumed to be capable of solving simple packaging issues and not required to ask reviewer to give patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110926.m0B9QSkC029925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 04:26 EST ------- This is merge-review where maintainer should be assumed to be capable of solving simple packaging issues and not required to ask reviewer to give patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 09:54:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 04:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801110954.m0B9sen1001333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From opensource at till.name 2008-01-11 04:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #33) > I think I understand the point of view. This documentation-devel package is used > to development documentation rpms. In that sense, documentation-devel is not the > runtime, but contains the files needed for you to develop the resulting runtime > (documentation). Whether it is developing code or words, it is all poetry. Hoy about rpmdev-doctools as a new name? There is also a rpmdev-tools package in Fedora, which is afaik developed by Fedora maintainers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111029.m0BATV6i007220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-11 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #35) > Even if packages are used for development, they cannot end with "-devel". It is > called gcc and not gcc-devel for example. Besides they are numerous occasions > where a package that ends with "-devel" is excluded. A few examples > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/8/FinalTreeTesting > > "Make sure default install doesn't include -devel packages" > > Look at the default kickstart files that are used to generate the GNOME and KDE > live images. They automatically exclude *-devel. In short any package that ends > with -devel is assumed to contain development files (headers et all) and not > development tools in various places throughout Fedora and making an exception > just for this package is unwieldy. You just have to call it something else. Thank you Rahul, Excellent read and I understand that now. It is okay not to include this in the default install. That being the case, is it okay to keep the name -devel? Cheers, Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:30:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] New: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: timc at inf.ed.ac.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SPECS/LADR.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SRPMS/LADR-200712-1.src.rpm Description: Prover9 is an automated theorem prover for first-order and equational logic, and Mace4 searches for finite models and counterexamples. Prover9 is the successor of the Otter prover. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:47:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:47:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111047.m0BAl3ao026875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrb at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 05:47 EST ------- sandmann, As you asked me to provide patch here it is --- libXi.spec 2007-09-24 23:55:47.000000000 +0530 +++ libXi-new.spec 2008-01-11 15:49:43.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXi runtime library Name: libXi Version: 1.1.3 -Release: 1%{?dist} -License: MIT/X11 +Release: 2%{?dist} +License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog +%doc COPYING ChangeLog %{_libdir}/libXi.so.6 %{_libdir}/libXi.so.6.0.0 @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/*.3* %changelog +* Fri Jan 11 2008 parag 1.1.3-2 +- Merge-review #226076 + * Mon Sep 24 2007 Adam Jackson 1.1.3-1 - libXi 1.1.3 Review this patch and open ACL for this package if you are not have enough time to resolve this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111049.m0BAnSxw009947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 ------- Additional Comments From timc at inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-01-11 05:49 EST ------- This is my first package, and you am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111048.m0BAmRLr026976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 timc at inf.ed.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:52:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226080] Merge Review: libXmu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111052.m0BAq1lG027545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXmu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226080 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrb at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 05:52 EST ------- sandmann, As you asked me to provide patch here it is --- libXmu.spec 2007-08-22 02:15:49.000000000 +0530 +++ libXmu-new.spec 2008-01-11 16:17:51.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXmu/libXmuu runtime libraries Name: libXmu Version: 1.0.3 -Release: 3%{?dist} -License: MIT/X11 +Release: 4%{?dist} +License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -BuildRequires: pkgconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-util-macros BuildRequires: libX11-devel BuildRequires: libXext-devel @@ -107,6 +106,9 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xmuu.pc %changelog +* Fri Jan 11 2008 parag 1.0.3-4 +- Merge-review #226076 + * Tue Aug 21 2007 Adam Jackson - 1.0.3-3 - Rebuild for build id Review this patch and open ACL for this package if you are not have enough time to resolve this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 10:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111056.m0BAuUMc011050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrb at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 05:56 EST ------- sandmann, As you asked me to provide patch here it is --- libXft.spec 2007-08-22 02:05:45.000000000 +0530 +++ libXft-new.spec 2008-01-11 16:22:25.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libXft runtime library Name: libXft Version: 2.1.12 -Release: 3%{?dist} -License: MIT/X11 +Release: 4%{?dist} +License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/lib/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -BuildRequires: pkgconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: libX11-devel BuildRequires: libXrender-devel @@ -74,7 +73,7 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog NEWS +%doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog %{_libdir}/libXft.so.2 %{_libdir}/libXft.so.2.1.2 @@ -95,6 +94,9 @@ %{_mandir}/man3/Xft.3* %changelog +* Fri Jan 11 2008 parag 2.1.12-4 +- Merge-review #226074 + * Tue Aug 21 2007 Adam Jackson - 2.1.12-3 - Rebuild for build id Review this patch and open ACL for this package if you are not have enough time to resolve this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:00:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111100.m0BB0ZpI028832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jrb at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 06:00 EST ------- sandmann, As you asked me to provide patch here it is --- libxkbfile.spec 2007-08-22 02:13:38.000000000 +0530 +++ libxkbfile-new.spec 2008-01-11 16:26:54.000000000 +0530 @@ -1,15 +1,14 @@ Summary: X.Org X11 libxkbfile runtime library Name: libxkbfile Version: 1.0.4 -Release: 3%{?dist} -License: MIT/X11 +Release: 4%{?dist} +License: MIT Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.x.org BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Source0: ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/individual/lib/libxkbfile/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -BuildRequires: pkgconfig BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel BuildRequires: libX11-devel @@ -64,7 +63,7 @@ %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS COPYING README ChangeLog +%doc COPYING ChangeLog %{_libdir}/libxkbfile.so.1 %{_libdir}/libxkbfile.so.1.0.2 @@ -85,6 +84,9 @@ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/xkbfile.pc %changelog +* Fri Jan 11 2008 parag 1.0.4-4 +- Merge-review #226077 + * Tue Aug 21 2007 Adam Jackson - 1.0.4-3 - Rebuild for build id Review this patch and open ACL for this package if you are not have enough time to resolve this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:06:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] New: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: leamas at bredband.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: /home/mk/src/rpms/srpms/freemind-0.9.0-0.Beta_15_icon_butterfly.1.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind-0.9.0-0.Beta_15_icon_butterfly.1.src.rpm Description: FreeMind is an open source mind mapping software that enables you to visualize ideas, projects, concepts, brainstorming, research or any other task that can benefit from a structured overview. The software consists of a desktop java program to create mindmaps, and a java applet for publishing mindmaps on the net. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111109.m0BB9Nwm030056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 06:09 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a1e70f726dbdb4c2aa456a50a3f535fd gpicview-0.1.7.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + desktop file installed correctly. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file handled correctly. + GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:12:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111112.m0BBCQKv013363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-01-11 06:12 EST ------- "Default install" is a a fuzzy concept in the bright new world of Fedora spins. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CustomSpins If I do a Fedora Documentation Spin, I might very well want to include this software out of the box as the functionality it brings is much needed in the documentation team which I am part of. I would suggest that naming not be dependent on whether it is currently the default in one of the spins we release. Again, the software is good and we would very much want it to be part of the Fedora 9 release. We only need to agree on a better naming convention to suit our guidelines. May I suggest DocsKit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:17:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111117.m0BBHL0Z031296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 leamas at bredband.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-11 06:17 EST ------- This is my first attempt to provide a package for Fedora... Also, it's a java application. There is an obvious need for guidelines for java apps, hav'nt found any. OTOH, this app was one of twenty good OS apps picked by a Swedish newspaper for general use, so it might make sense to include it. The spec URL is (obviously) wrong. Should be: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 11:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111157.m0BBvoas004214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:00:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111200.m0BC0HPO004885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-11 07:00 EST ------- i uploaded new tested files: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-5.i386.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-5.src.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.spec http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.tar.gz :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111214.m0BCEiwY006798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226529, which changed state. Bug 226529 Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226529] Merge Review: vixie-cron In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111214.m0BCEhqc006774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: vixie-cron https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226529 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:14 EST ------- I'd like to close it, because of new package review with new name of package #428007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:20:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111220.m0BCKE23007948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 07:20 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111219.m0BCJEGl007469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 07:19 EST ------- Do anyone care to provide updates here? I see so many co-owners for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:18:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111218.m0BCINLP007422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Summary|Package review: vixie-cron- |Package review: cronie |ng | Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:18 EST ------- I've fixed some of mentioned problems. I'm working on better Makefile. The package was renamed on cronie (successor of cron) and I didn't find any problems with this name. git and page on fedorahosted will be renamed, I've already create a ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111220.m0BCKgbD022793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #38) > "Default install" is a a fuzzy concept in the bright new world of Fedora spins. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CustomSpins > That's the one! Our target is to create a custom spin for documentation writers, publishers and syndicators with a series of tools. I am most excited about the docbot project which is another top level package of -devel. But i need more time for that one. The command line environment that -devel sets up will suffice for now. > If I do a Fedora Documentation Spin, I might very well want to include this > software out of the box as the functionality it brings is much needed in the > documentation team which I am part of. I would suggest that naming not be > dependent on whether it is currently the default in one of the spins we release. > > Again, the software is good and we would very much want it to be part of the > Fedora 9 release. We only need to agree on a better naming convention to suit > our guidelines. May I suggest DocsKit? > What I am trying to avoid is a respin of the top level packages that -devel has created for us in the past. There are 179 top-level projects that reference -devel in their makefiles for their development. There are 48 owners of these top level packages we are servicing. Not impossible, but expensive to do. It will cost about $9k per day and we project a 2 day shutdown for the respin if everything goes right. But i know something will go wrong, things always do. I want to minimize risk. There are a lot of names we could use, I suggest Jeff Fearn's birth-city of Liverpool to honour his commitment. When we polled the top level package owners, all hell broke loose and the names kept coming and coming and coming. The community of use around this -devel package can be very creative and some times too much creativity can be bad thing. So Jeff, if you are reading this, will not call it "pants". - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:30:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:30:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111230.m0BCUTqU009368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:30 EST ------- And the new source is here: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/cronie/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226236] Merge Review: pciutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111231.m0BCVfZp024219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pciutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226236 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(harald at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 07:31 EST ------- here is new review now 1) Should follow packaging guideline for timestamp http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab 2) Do pciutils really need to install static library. Can we stop providing static library /usr/lib/libpci.a http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-2302ec1e1f44202c9cc4bcce24cb711266557ad7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111235.m0BCZoPA010234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:35 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: firstaidkit Short Description: A tool that automates simple and common system recovery tasks. Owners: joelGranados, martinSivak Branches: f8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:35:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 361701] Package review: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111235.m0BCZk2G010196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl.e | |du) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:42:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:42:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111242.m0BCgOlJ011129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #32) > Furthermore, I have yet to see a legitimate reason why renaming this package > would be such a burden beyond the emotional desire to keep it only because it > was named such internally in the past. Hi Warren, Remember the Library of Alexandria project that I talked about 2 years ago? Well this is it and you know we're crazy enough to pull it off with the custom spins. This wombat has a purpose and a direct intention. Jim is right, what long term value is Ubuntu generating for open source by their violation of the law. Power and privledge cannot move a people *if* they stand in the law. Whatever it takes, get us on the battlefield! - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 12:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111258.m0BCwF51013767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 07:58 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=341480 Ha I've fixed it. The spec was missing kdelibs3, kdelibs3-devel wasn't enough. Please check it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:01:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:01:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111301.m0BD1pfJ028973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-11 08:01 EST ------- I've given a try today. It seems to work, my var/log/messages is full of stuff generated by halevt. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:03:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111303.m0BD3Gv4014845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 08:03 EST ------- I like the name. I have some comments on upstream. * I think it would be better to isolate crond.pam, crond.sysconfig vixie-cron.init (renamed cronie.init) in something like a contrib directory and not install them, they are platform specific. * you should not use AC_TRY_RUN, but AC_TRY_LINK (or similar) otherwise cross compilation is impossible. * you should use sysconfdir instead of etcdir * There are some strange unconditional AC_DEFINE. * The following shouldn't be useful: crond_LDFLAGS = \ $(LDFLAGS) * cp in man/Makefile.am are wrong. automake should be able to figure out what to do with these files, and if it cannot there are better way to handle them. * The fact that vixie-cron.init and crond.sysconfig appear in the distribution is complete magic to me * You should copy the automake/autoconf files, not link them. Like automake -c or simply autoreconf * there are many things in src/pathnames.h that should be set from configure values. * there is an url missing in the README I can make patches for the things for which patches make sense. Is there a version control somewhere for cronie? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111308.m0BD8WjW015619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 08:08 EST ------- I haven't looked at the details, but having to BuildRequires kdelibs3 seems wrong. Also you should post an url for the new srpm and spec file each time you make changes, the one I see seems old. There is not Source in this one, but maybe it is fixed in later ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:21:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111321.m0BDLWTe031831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 08:21 EST ------- I can make a F-7 branch if somebody asks for it, but given that I had to submit it I guess that nobody will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111320.m0BDKdKM031626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 08:20 EST ------- Manuel, thanks for the quick review. Filling /var/log/messages is not necessarily the proof of a great software, but currently it is on purpose because there hasn't been a lot of testing and these messages also help to understand what event halevt sees. Maybe I'll try to do a less verbose release or have a configurable verbosity someday. As for the ChangeLog, I try to have everything relevant for users in NEWS, ChangeLog is for developers only. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: halevt Short Description: Generic handler for HAL events Owners: pertusus Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111324.m0BDOM68017808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-11 08:24 EST ------- For a start, you still do have a wrong name for the .spec: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpmlint themonospot-0.6.5*rpm themonospot.src: E: invalid-spec-name themonospot-0.6.5.spec In addition, permissions of the files that you have included in the spec are not those expected by rpmlint: error checking signature of themonospot-0.6.5-5.src.rpm themonospot.src: W: strange-permission themonospot-0.6.5.spec 0666 themonospot.src: W: strange-permission themonospot-0.6.5.tar.gz 0666 And nothing was fixed with respect to building in mock, it fails with the same error as before (comments 13 and 22). Please test your src.rpm in x86_64 environment, this is the context where it fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111329.m0BDTsr9018579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-11 08:29 EST ------- FWIW: My testing was performed on a F-7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:34:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:34:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111334.m0BDYHEM001075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 13:41:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111341.m0BDfhhJ002362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 kvolny at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-01-11 08:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qmmp Short Description: Qt-based multimedia player Owners: kvolny Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: jwrdegoede Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111405.m0BE5c73024677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-11 09:05 EST ------- This is just an informal review, you still need a sponsor. But here it is: Naming: Since you are the upstream maintainer, I guess you are free to use LADR instead of ladr. However, if there are no particular reasons to use capital letters, uing lowercase would fit better into the Fedora naming scheme. Licensing: GPL file included, GPL preamnble in all C files. No overall GPLL statement for the complete package, no GPL header inn python scripts. Don't know what to think about this, I'm a rookie. testing. This package install ~35 files into /usr/bin. The docs are somewhat hard to find - the reference to the manual in README.first is wrong, and the programs don't understand standard '-h'/'..help' options. It's possible to invoke some tools without segfaulting. The website URL is fine. Once again, don't know what to think OK Rpmlint is silent OK Spec file name. OK Licensing. OK License: field matches sw. OK License included in doc. OK Spec file in American English: I'm from Sweden, but to ny understanding... OK Spec file legible OK Source MD5sum: 6e2896ed4cce4556bfcc321778df5dfe upstream and in src.rpm OK Builds on i386 OK See no reason to exclude architecture(s) OK All build dependencies listed (mock test OK) OK Locales management - this package is not localized. OK Libraries (no libraries in this package) OK Not relocateble. OK Owns it's directories. OK No %file duplicates OK File permissions OK %clean target OK Consistent macro usage OK Code/permissive content (this is just code). OK No large documentation OK Doc's don't affect runtime. OK No header files OK No static libraries OK No pkgconfig file(s) OK No libraries OK No devel package OK Not a GUI application OK Does not own other package's file/dirs. OK rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install OK Valid filenames (just ASCII) OK No scriplets OK No subpackages OK No pkgconfig files OK No file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111412.m0BECnue007333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From svenkate at redhat.com 2008-01-11 09:12 EST ------- As pnemade suggested, I too feel some thing like DocumentationKit suits well for this. *-devel sounds quite raw to me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111430.m0BEUqpw010123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-11 09:30 EST ------- Ok, all three are fixed up. And I actually tested the changes this time ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111440.m0BEev9Y029670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 09:40 EST ------- and where can I find new SRPM link? I mean where should I look for review of this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:45:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111445.m0BEjrcS012154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-11 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > and where can I find new SRPM link? I mean where should I look for review of > this package :) haha, oops. Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/system-summary-0.0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 14:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427996] Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111455.m0BEtOss013927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xqilla - XQilla is an XQuery and XPath 2.0 library, built on top of Xerces-C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427996 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 09:55 EST ------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428435] New: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: timc at inf.ed.ac.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SPECS/shezhu.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timc/repos/fedora8/SRPMS/shezhu-1.19-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Shezhu Resource Sharing System (pronounced Says-Who) is an application for scheduling and booking shared resources such as rooms and equipment. Note that this is my second package (for review) and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111501.m0BF1QCI014925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 timc at inf.ed.ac.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:05:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111505.m0BF5ZFf001534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-11 10:05 EST ------- time to close the bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111504.m0BF4UMm000963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 10:04 EST ------- To make it sure, did Roozbeh say to you that you can take over the maintainership of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111508.m0BF8mfD001890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 ------- Additional Comments From timc at inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-01-11 10:08 EST ------- Thanks for your comments. I am not the upstream maintainer and the name LADR is an acronym so keeping the uppercase seemed more appropriate - no problem to change it if that is the preferred option. Not sure about the GPL stuff - could I just apply a patch to add the missing GPL statements and then inform upstream to add them? Regarding "The docs are somewhat hard to find - the reference to the manual in README.first is wrong, and the programs don't understand standard '-h'/'..help' options." - I am not sure to what extent I should be modifying an upstream package (and the code in the case of adding help options) in order to get a package accepted as the guidelines make no mention of this - were I the actual maintainer of the package I could see that this would be good of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:12:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:12:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111512.m0BFCpqj017044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 10:12 EST ------- When I rpmbuild above SPEC on F8 and installed it and tried to start it from console, I got fatal: unable to import system_summary No module named system_summary.main What should be problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111516.m0BFGqZq017713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 10:16 EST ------- definitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 405161] Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111524.m0BFO42p004016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405161 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 10:24 EST ------- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111528.m0BFSSws019245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 nphilipp at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2008-01-11 10:28 EST ------- CHECK: - Summary and description contain bad English, summary is too long, I'd use: Summary: Cron daemon for executing programs at set times %description Cronie contains the standard UNIX daemon crond that runs specified programs at scheduled times and related tools. It is a fork of the original vixie-cron and has security and configuration enhancements like the ability to use pam and SELinux. - URL in the spec file doesn't match new name (needs action from Fedora infrastructure) - Add the epoch to "Obsoletes: vixie-cron <= 4.3" otherwise upgrading won't work (a missing epoch has the same effect as a zero epoch) - Unnecessary build requirement on automake (you don't use it in the spec file, if the Makefiles try to rebuild themselves, there's something wrong) - %preun mustn't fail, add ' || :' to the chkconfig command as well (it's always the last command that defines the exit code of a %pre/%post/un scriptlet) - Get rid of the %triggerpostun, the vixie-cron version where it would trigger is older than RHEL2.1 Likely not harmful, but odd: - I don't know why you have this in %build: CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"; export CFLAGS [...] %configure \ [...] If you use %configure, it already evaluates $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. - what purpose does "make ... RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -DLINT -Dlint" have? Does the Makefile make use of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (which wouldn't be good IMHO)? I take it your working on the following issues in the course of you Makefile fixes: - "make install" does much too few which you workaround in the spec file by creating directories, copying/moving stuff to the directories, I can help with automake/autofoo if you wish so "make install" just works (possibly followup issues of the last one: - no need to use %attr() for all the files if "make install" just does "the right thing" - don't move files out of the source/build directory as it breaks "rpm -bi --short-circuit", just copy them, or better let them be installed with "make install" - instead of renaming %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/crond.pam to .../crond, just let "make install" do the right thing (i.e. install the file as "crond", not "crond.pam") ) GOOD: - pkg name issue fixed - rpmlint checks return nothing - license text and other documentation in %doc - consistent use of macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111537.m0BFbqoC020683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 10:37 EST ------- Just tried to rebuild but it failed on dist-f9. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=341768 (especially please check build.log. For F-9+, egg-info file is created). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111534.m0BFYhOW020048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2008-01-11 10:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > I have some comments on upstream. > * I think it would be better to isolate crond.pam, crond.sysconfig > vixie-cron.init (renamed cronie.init) in something like a contrib > directory and not install them, they are platform specific. IMO contrib/ directories are usually for stuff contributors submit but upstream doesn't plan to support (which clearly is not the case here). I'd add e.g. --with-pam and --with-sysvinit to configure.ac and install the files if the user wants it. Marcela, shout if you want help with that. > * The fact that vixie-cron.init and crond.sysconfig appear in the > distribution is complete magic to me What do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111541.m0BFfUbe021410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: rdesktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-11 10:41 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111540.m0BFeeFR021279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-11 10:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > When I rpmbuild above SPEC on F8 and installed it and tried to start it from > console, I got > fatal: unable to import system_summary > No module named system_summary.main > > What should be problem? Kind of odd. Is that just running 'system-summary'? I've had no problems on my F8 machine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111541.m0BFfcDp021442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 10:41 EST ------- [12] Thanks, the git archive could be found on https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/vixie-cron [9] source could be also from my page http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/cronie/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:42:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111542.m0BFgUxd021485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-11 10:42 EST ------- - spec name corrected (same of other output) - permission problem solved, at my workhouse i use VirtualBox with shared folders and somethimes i need to give all privilege to move files - solved online repository application problem (sources difference problem) - mock with x86 work fine - rpmlint say: themonospot.i386: W: no-documentation themonospot.i386: E: no-binary themonospot.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib themonospot.i386: E: unknown-key GPG#c8fa4777 themonospot.i386: W: empty-%post themonospot.i386: W: empty-%postun NEW FILES... http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-6.spec http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-6.src.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5-6.i386.rpm http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/packages/fedora/themonospot-0.6.5.tar.gz With x86_64 test i had: Error: Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package fedora-release-notes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111553.m0BFrEhp023036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-11 10:53 EST ------- ======================= Package Name: gpicview Short Description: A simple fast image viewer Owners: mwiriad Branches: F-7 F-8 devel InitialCC: mwiriad Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426740] Review Request: mucommander - Lightweight cross-platform file manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111557.m0BFvDCT008853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mucommander - Lightweight cross-platform file manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426740 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(kurzawax at gmail.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 10:57 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 15:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111554.m0BFsq5A023375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 10:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > I have some comments on upstream. > > * I think it would be better to isolate crond.pam, crond.sysconfig > > vixie-cron.init (renamed cronie.init) in something like a contrib > > directory and not install them, they are platform specific. > > IMO contrib/ directories are usually for stuff contributors submit but upstream > doesn't plan to support (which clearly is not the case here). I'd add e.g. > --with-pam and --with-sysvinit to configure.ac and install the files if the user > wants it. Marcela, shout if you want help with that. Yes, that would be another possibility. And indeed contrib is a bad name for a directory holding those files. Maybe data or utils? In any case they shouldn't be installed in the default case since they are too platform dependent. > > * The fact that vixie-cron.init and crond.sysconfig appear in the > > distribution is complete magic to me > > What do you mean? I may have missed something but they are not in any variable in Makefile.am nor in EXTRA_DIST... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:03:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111603.m0BG3t12025111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-11 11:03 EST ------- I love pain. Love love love. Taking this one out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:06:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225806] Merge Review: glibc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111606.m0BG6N3w010655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glibc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225806 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226504] Merge Review: tsclient In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111603.m0BG3mBl010024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tsclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226504 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226504] Merge Review: tsclient In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111606.m0BG6GdK025803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tsclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226504 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111607.m0BG7KQL025870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 11:07 EST ------- I'll go ahead and review this... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111607.m0BG7XHK010736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmz at pobox.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111612.m0BGCJD0026654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-11 11:12 EST ------- sorry its working fine. I had a tarball installation in /usr/local and rpm installation in /usr. rpmlint is silent. verified upstream source 29adfb43cb8c00771d7d69271b8c7594 system-summary-0.0.3.tar.bz2 Desktop files handled correctly. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111612.m0BGCisJ026691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 11:12 EST ------- For general packaging guidelines, please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines For 0.2.1-2: * disttag - Please consider to use %{?dist} tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * URL - Perhaps URL contains some typo :) * Seemingly unneeded Provides - Why do you want to make -plugins subpackage have "Provides: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" or so? - Also, "Obsoletes: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" seems unneeded as perhaps Fedora has never had nntpgrab-plugin-nntp rpm. * Dependency between subpackage - -devel subpackage should have "Requires: %{name}-core = %{version}-%{release}" * %configure - %configure should be moved to %build. * Vendor name of desktop file - Usually the vendor id of desktop file should be "fedora". Do you want to have desktop file named "NNTPGrab-nntpgrab.desktop"? * libtool .la file <-> .so symlink - libtool .la file should be removed unless needed. Instead the symlink %{_libdir}/libnntpgrab.so should _not_ be removed and this symlink should be included in -devel subpackage. * defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Directory ownership issue - %{_includedir}/nntpgrab is not owned by any packages. * Dependency for -devel pacakage - %_libdir/pkgconfig/nntpgrab.pc contains the line: -------------------------------------------------------- 9 Requires: glib-2.0 -------------------------------------------------------- Also %_includedir/nntpgrab/nntpgrab.h contains -------------------------------------------------------- 22 #include -------------------------------------------------------- This means that -devel subpackage should have "Requires: glib2-devel". ? plugins - By the way, if all files in -plugins package under %_libdir directory are only used as plugins called by only dlopen, is it possible - to move all plugins to some unique directory only used by nntpgrab, for example %_libdir/nntpgrab - and "rename" (not symlink) libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so.0.0.0 to libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so, for example (as dlopen'ed file name is libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so) (not a blocker) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111613.m0BGDdVA011625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rnorwood at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111619.m0BGJ4Sn027498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-11 11:19 EST ------- Great! Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:18:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:18:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111618.m0BGIT6N027448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, | |mclasen at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 11:18 EST ------- Umm.. gtk2 maintainers, would you watch this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:22:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:22:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417111] Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111622.m0BGMKJm012947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417111 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-11 11:22 EST ------- Does someone reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:41:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:41:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111641.m0BGfpKx015677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-11 11:41 EST ------- [14] with-pam is defined, I can add with-sysvinit. [15] I can move these files into some /data. I think you mean installing crond.pam etc. with Makefile.am. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111648.m0BGmv6Q031404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 matt at rudeserver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |panelfm Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From matt at rudeserver.com 2008-01-11 11:48 EST ------- Thanks for the review and the patch, I have made the requested changes. Spec URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudecgi.spec SRPM URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudecgi-5.1.0-1.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rudecgi Short Description: Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data Owners: homeless Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:57:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111657.m0BGvk7i032740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-11 11:57 EST ------- I do not want to sound harsh and I will try to assist you if you want to follow my advice, but I think it's time to start learning a bit more. Programming is one avenue, packaging is another one and they do not necessarily overlap completely. As long as the src.rpm does not properly build on all architectures (or at least a valid reason to not build is provided) we are not going anywhere. The output of rpmlint for the .i386 binary is relevant, but not sufficient. The final aim is to have no output, i.e. no warning/no error (the unknown-key is a false alarm, can be ignored) AND to have the application built on all architectures supported by Fedora, including ppc and 64 bits. Try to fix your x86_64 environment, come to #fedora/#fedora-devel or use the appropriate mailing lists if you need assistance, but you should first prove that you know the packaging guidelines before getting accepted as contributor. So far you have proven that there is lot of room for improvement. For instance you have to convince your build -- either by modifying the source _in_ the tarball _or_ by patching in %prep -- that the language files should go in the same folder with the binary (if they are architecture dependent). Or maybe somewhere else in the opposite case. Either case, for the moment there is an error which must be solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 16:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111659.m0BGxJfh018051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-11 11:59 EST ------- I don't think we'll ship any patched gtk versions in parallel to gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 17:06:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111706.m0BH6BjZ019756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 ------- Additional Comments From radford at blackbean.org 2008-01-11 12:06 EST ------- Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/dot2tex-2.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/dot2tex-2.7.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Fixed fc9 build by adding the newly generated python egg-info file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 17:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111729.m0BHTMIk023093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 jbowes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-11 12:29 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-summary Short Description: A quick summary of system hardware Owners: jbowes Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 17:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111747.m0BHlI90026244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 12:47 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (LGPLv2+, GPLv2+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 53ede8c7422cb251d01d06c7a5e3027b audit-1.6.5.tar.gz 53ede8c7422cb251d01d06c7a5e3027b audit-1.6.5.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. See below - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. See below - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - check for outstanding bugs on package. Issues: 1. You should not call rpm from inside a spec file. Just use the hard coded version of selinux-policy thats available? 2. The Source0 url should be: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/audit-1.6.5.tar.gz 3. Why is the check section commented? Not working? Perhaps add a comment why it's not working and when it's expected to be added. 4. Do you need to ship static libs here? 5. The postun for libs can be simplified from: %postun libs /sbin/ldconfig 2>/dev/null to: %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig 6. Please use desktop-file-install to install the desktop file... see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-d559ee7363418a5840ce63090c608c991cd39ce6 7. You can probibly remove Prereq: coreutils 8. rpmlint says: The following seem ignorable: audispd-plugins.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/audispd-zos-remote 0750 audispd-plugins.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/audispd-zos-remote 0750 audispd-plugins.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audisp/plugins.d/audispd-zos-remote.conf 0640 audispd-plugins.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audisp/zos-remote.conf 0640 audispd-plugins.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audisp/plugins.d/syslog.conf 0640 audispd-plugins.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/audisp/plugins.d/syslog.conf audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/audisp/plugins.d 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audit/audit.rules 0640 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib64/audit 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/aulastlog 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/aulastlog 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/audit 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/autrace 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/autrace 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/auditctl 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/auditctl 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/auditd 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/auditd 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audisp/audispd.conf 0640 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/audispd 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/audispd 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audit/auditd.conf 0640 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/audisp 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/audisp/plugins.d/af_unix.conf 0640 audit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/audit 0750 audit.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/auditd 0640 audit-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation audit-libs.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/libaudit.conf 0640 audit-libs-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation audit-libs-python.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/auparse.so 0775 audit.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/auditd audit.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/auditd These seem like they should be addressed: audit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/audisp/plugins.d/af_unix.conf Make it a config? audit.src:21: W: prereq-use coreutils Remove it? audit.src:232: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/python?.?/site-packages/audit.py* Are these arch independent? Then this can be ignored. audit.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/audit Add a logrotate file? audit.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv Do you need those upgrade commands in post anymore? Perhaps remove them or comment on what version is migrated here so it can be removed down the road. system-config-audit.x86_64: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/libexec/system-config-audit-server /usr/bin/consolehelper Make this a relative link? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:04:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:04:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111804.m0BI47nK010649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-01-11 13:04 EST ------- Looks good. rpmlint is happy, the sources match upstream, and most of the other packaging guidelines don't apply to this documentation-only package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 17:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111759.m0BHxlJC009597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-11 12:59 EST ------- Well, I'm a rookie as you, but as see it: - The Packaging/NamingGuidelines has a separate header "Case Sensitivity". I suggest you read it and interpret the upstream requirements in that context. - To my understanding, this situation is covered by Licensing/FAQ, the first entry. Basically, this boils down to "contact upstream". - Things like the bad filename could be fixed by a patch (preferably taking the installations directory /usr/share/LADR into account). The rest of the comments are, as you have noticed, aimed for the upstream maintainer. And this is not you... sorry I got it wrong. Sorry (embarrassed!) for all typos. I lost what I had written, and had to rewrite it being all but happy :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111803.m0BI39P5029018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 13:03 EST ------- Can you post an updated spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111808.m0BI8jGo030040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 13:08 EST ------- F-8 branch added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:21:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226504] Merge Review: tsclient In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111821.m0BIL1vY031921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tsclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226504 ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-11 13:21 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. FIX - Spec has consistant macro usage. - Do not use %makeinstall macro OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. FIX - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - Vendor should be set to fedora instead of tsclient - remove the " --add-category Utility " entry OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. FIX - No rpmlint output. SRPM: tsclient.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 50, tab: line 53) RPM: tsclient.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.150.5 0.150-5.fc8 tsclient.i386: E: incorrect-locale-el /usr/share/locale/gr/LC_MESSAGES/tsclient.mo - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version FIX - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) 242315 - remove the Utility category (see above) Issues: 1. Do not use %makeinstall macro 2. Fix vendor in desktop file, should be fedora 3. Fix bug 242315 4. rpmlint not quiet rpm: Changelog should use - instead of . to denote release Need to notify upstream that the Greek local has changed from el to gr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226650] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111834.m0BIYaol001147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226650 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr BugsThisDependsOn| |237621 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 13:34 EST ------- I think that almost many of the files in /etc/X11/xdm/ should be %config and even %config(noreplace). Having the pam files %config and not %config(noreplace) seems a bit dubious to me. It seems to me that xdm lacks proper integration in fedora for 2 things, it doesn't use consolekit or /usr/share/xsessions. To help with that, I created little package that add: * Support for a session chooser using xsessions/*.desktop files * ConsoleKit session at http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/xdm-ck-xsessions.html I think that it should be nice to use it in some way in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226650] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111839.m0BIdKJI001837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-xdm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226650 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 13:39 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291409) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291409&action=view) spec file patch with cleanups remove old cruft, keep timestamps, version obsoletes and provides. %{_datadir}/X11/app-defaults/Chooser is not to be edited by the user,and hopefully there is a place where user customization should go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:49:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111849.m0BIn64x016880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 13:49 EST ------- I can review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111845.m0BIjDig016645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-11 13:45 EST ------- This is not a review, just a rookie skimming through the spec file... Style: CAPITAL letters in Summary: and Description looks odd. %files: You should probably use %{_var} instead of /var %files: /usr/lib should probably be %{_libdir}, taking possible 64-bit issues into account. but then also the Makefile must do the Right Thing. %files: Use %{_sbindir} instead of /usr/sbin IMHO. Is it important that the file(s) installed under /usr/sbin is owned by apache/apache? Don't know if/where this is regulated, but normally executables are owned by root. Since you seem to install with default 755 permission, I don't get the point... OTOH, I'm used to that feeling ;-) BTW. this also introduces a dependency on the 'apache' user... How is that handled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 18:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111853.m0BIr9o6003910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 13:53 EST ------- Scratch build submitted: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=342895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111908.m0BJ8sQX006318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 14:08 EST ------- Hrm, seems to be a problem using it (the scratch build anyway), systemsettings crashes with: systemsettings: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/kde4/kwin3_quarticurve.so: undefined symbol: _ZN7QPixmapC2ERK5QSizeNS_4TypeE ?? I'll continue to the review on other items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111911.m0BJBQAg020620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 14:11 EST ------- rpmlint: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided bluecurve-kwin-theme kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin-0.0-0.1.beta3.fc9.x86_64.rpm The name *is* kinda long, why include "decoration-native'? (or maybe that's from the proposed kde naming spec)? speaking of names, including 'kde3' in the name seems a bit confusing too. ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:13:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111913.m0BJDjqG006984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 14:13 EST ------- Packaging-wise, the spec looks simple, clean enough. Address/respond-to the "not working" and "naming" issues (worksforme, forget it, respectfully, are acceptable. :) ), and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111915.m0BJFHUc007584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jwilson at redhat.com | |) ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-01-11 14:15 EST ------- Jarod, here's a review. Things look mostly sane. The few minor issues are noted below. I'll attach a patch that makes these changes. Feel free to use some or all of it, with or without attribution. ;) * source files match upstream: b3cb316c652b09ec66f93f4ea98a93a7a1001678 sysfsutils-2.1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) X license field matches the actual license. The main package license should be GPLv2 (cmd/systool.c specifies v2 and has no "or any later version clause") The libsysfs subpackage should be LGPLv2+ * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none are needed). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (fedora-devel-x86_64,). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. (not quite, but these warnings should be okay to ignore): sysfsutils.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.0-2 2.1.0-1.fc9 libsysfs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation * final provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X scriptlets are properly run for libs ldconfig needs to be run for the libsysfs subpackage * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226447] Merge Review: sysfsutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111916.m0BJGTCT021349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sysfsutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226447 ------- Additional Comments From tmz at pobox.com 2008-01-11 14:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291411) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291411&action=view) patch to fix minor issues for merge review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:15:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226228] Merge Review: pam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111915.m0BJFfBQ021189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226228 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 14:15 EST ------- I'd be happy to review this... look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226495] Merge Review: tmpwatch In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111917.m0BJH4CE021388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tmpwatch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226495 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbwillia at math.vt.edu, docs- | |list at fedoralinks.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-11 14:17 EST ------- I took a further look and have a couple of additional issues. To sumarize: I there's really no upstream, please make a note of that in the spec. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL If it's hosted internally to Red Hat, please consider transferring it to some externally visible site such as fedorahosted.org. Parallel make: there's only one source file so there's really no point, but if you're fixin things you might as well future-proof thins. Then there's this rpmlint complaint: %{_sysconfdir} is generally preferred to /etc. tmpwatch.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/tmpwatch This one is interesting. I'm guessing that this was marked as %config in the past because someone was annoyed that a package update wiped out their changes. However: A shell script is a really poor configuration interface. If we end up having to protect an additional directory in /tmp from cleanup, there will be issues because we can't update that script. Would it be at all possible to move the bits that people might want to configure into a file in /etc/sysconfig? It doesn't look like it should be difficult at all. The only licensing information I can see is in tmpwatch.c, which says only "under the terms of the GPL". Isn't Red Hat developed code supposed to be GPLv2 only? I'm told it's corporate policy. BuildRoot: is not correct; it needs to have at least %release, but would be better if it were it were one of the recommended values. Checklist: ? can't compare sources with upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written. X should use %{_sysconfdir} * summary is OK. * description is OK. X build root is improper. ? license field matches the actual license. ? not sure if the license is correct. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: config(tmpwatch) = 2.9.12-2 tmpwatch = 2.9.12-2 = /bin/sh config(tmpwatch) = 2.9.12-2 psmisc * %check is not present. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * neither creates nor owns any directories. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:21:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111921.m0BJL2B5008624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2008-01-11 14:21 EST ------- > This is merge-review where maintainer should be assumed to be capable of solving simple packaging issues and not required to ask reviewer to give patch. This is an open source project where whoever wants something done, gets to do the work. This patch looks fine. Please commit. The ACL's for this package are already open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226080] Merge Review: libXmu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111922.m0BJM0Pf022248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXmu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226080 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2008-01-11 14:21 EST ------- Looks fine, please commit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:24:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111924.m0BJOMHW022397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|xgl-maint at redhat.com | Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2008-01-11 14:24 EST ------- Why was AUTHORS and README removed from %doc in libXi, but not here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:24:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111924.m0BJOpoV022583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 14:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This is an open source project where whoever wants something done, gets to do > the work. That's partly true, but we also have guidelines and packages that don't follow guidelines cannot enter the distribution. Here the package is already in, but the idea remains the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:25:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111925.m0BJPM0M022988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 sandmann at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(sandmann at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From sandmann at redhat.com 2008-01-11 14:25 EST ------- Same question: Do AUTHORS and README belong in %doc, or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:52:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111952.m0BJq8lV012999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #291414|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111951.m0BJp4OC027029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-01-11 14:51 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291414) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291414&action=view) spec file for NNTPGrab, with feedback from comment #1 New srpm can be found at http://www.nntpgrab.nl/fedora/nntpgrab-0.2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > * disttag > - Please consider to use %{?dist} tag. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag Added in the Release field > * URL > - Perhaps URL contains some typo :) Fixed > * Seemingly unneeded Provides > - Why do you want to make -plugins subpackage have > "Provides: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" or so? > > - Also, "Obsoletes: nntpgrab-plugin-nntp" seems unneeded > as perhaps Fedora has never had nntpgrab-plugin-nntp > rpm. This is because in a previous version of the .spec file, there were sub-packages for each individual plugin. There already are several users which have installed this previous version. Before proposing this package into Fedora, I decided to merge those sub-packages to one -plugins sub-package. So to provide the old users a seamless upgrade once this package hits Fedora, I had to use the provides/obsoletes trick. > * Dependency between subpackage > - -devel subpackage should have > "Requires: %{name}-core = %{version}-%{release}" Fixed > * %configure > - %configure should be moved to %build. Fixed > * Vendor name of desktop file > - Usually the vendor id of desktop file should be "fedora". > Do you want to have desktop file named "NNTPGrab-nntpgrab.desktop"? Vendor for the desktop file changed to 'fedora' > * libtool .la file <-> .so symlink > - libtool .la file should be removed unless needed. Instead > the symlink %{_libdir}/libnntpgrab.so should _not_ be removed > and this symlink should be included in -devel subpackage. Added the file %{_libdir}/libnntpgrab.so to the -devel subpackage. > * defattr > - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Fixed > * Directory ownership issue > - %{_includedir}/nntpgrab is not owned by any packages. Fixed (I hope, couldn't find any good documentation about directory ownerships) > * Dependency for -devel pacakage > - %_libdir/pkgconfig/nntpgrab.pc contains the line: > -------------------------------------------------------- > 9 Requires: glib-2.0 > -------------------------------------------------------- > Also %_includedir/nntpgrab/nntpgrab.h contains > -------------------------------------------------------- > 22 #include > -------------------------------------------------------- > This means that -devel subpackage should have > "Requires: glib2-devel". Fixed > ? plugins > - By the way, if all files in -plugins package under %_libdir > directory are only used as plugins called by only dlopen, is > it possible > - to move all plugins to some unique directory only used > by nntpgrab, for example %_libdir/nntpgrab > - and "rename" (not symlink) libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so.0.0.0 to > libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so, for example (as dlopen'ed > file name is libnntpgrab_plugin_nntp.so) > (not a blocker) ? For now, I've removed all the symlinks for the plugins and renamed them to name_of_plugin.so. For the next version of NNTPGrab I will put the plugins in a seperate directory (/usr/lib/nntpgrab) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 19:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226119] Merge Review: MAKEDEV In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801111958.m0BJw2U4013913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: MAKEDEV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226119 tmz at pobox.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmz at pobox.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:23:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:23:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112023.m0BKN0ip018006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl AssignedTo|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-11 15:22 EST ------- Okay, a new version with the dual head fix in is here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/nogravity.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/nogravity-2.00-4.fc9.src.rpm Now can someone please review this? To be clear I've taken over as review submitter, so I'm no longer reviewing this. I'm updating the bug status to reflect this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:35:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:35:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112035.m0BKZZxb020006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From pkennedy at redhat.com 2008-01-11 15:35 EST ------- Personally, I don't care what it is called as long as it works properly. If we must rename it to avoid the -devel connotation, then lets keep it simple. For example "DocKit", if it does not infringe on another product or project name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:34:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112034.m0BKYV0S019486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From konradr at redhat.com 2008-01-11 15:34 EST ------- 1). English Summary: Library that Standardizes the Access to Kernel Tunables Why not say: Summary: Library that standardizes the access to Kernel tunables ? 2). In http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines, section titled: "Using %{buildroot} and %{optflags} vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS" it mentions that you should use RPM_OPT_FLAGS instead of "optflags". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409401] Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112037.m0BKbqLc001995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: extragear-plasma - Additional plasmoids for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409401 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 15:37 EST ------- closing, in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 393041] Review Request: libzip - C library for reading, creating, and modifying zip archives In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112040.m0BKeBpr002700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libzip - C library for reading, creating, and modifying zip archives https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393041 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 15:40 EST ------- In rawhide now, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:46:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112046.m0BKkJMI021616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From sgrubb at redhat.com 2008-01-11 15:46 EST ------- BTW, I use essentially the same spec file for upstream, RHEL, and Fedora. I don't like making changes for one that affects another since the audit system is under heavy development. If it were an older stable package, I wouldn't care so much. #1 fixed, #2 fixed but I like the shorter version better...why else have an url? #3 its a reminder to get it working at some point - added a comment, #4 sometimes people like to make a utility that runs early or from busybox. I'd rather delete it in a few more weeks. #5 it already was that way, #6 will look into it another day, patches are welcome, #7 that was put there because it was required. There was a bz opened that this was the fix for so I can't get rid of it, #8 a) af_unix must be that way due to a mistake that must be overwritten. I'll change that another time. b) coreutils has to be there. c) I don't know a better way to do this patches welcome please test on x86_64, though. d) logrotate is the enemy of audit. Audit must do its own rotation for security purposes. e) those upgrade commands are for audit 1.0.x systems. f) where is this done in the spec file? I don't see any symlinking of consolehelper. Then again, consolehelper had better be in /usr/bin and not some relative directory. audit-1.6.5-3 has the changes from this review in it. When you see if finish going through koji successfully, please feel free to look it over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 20:50:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:50:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112050.m0BKofWk022250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-01-11 15:50 EST ------- Hans, please file a new bug so I can close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112106.m0BL6RnH006766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-11 16:06 EST ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Hans, please file a new bug so I can close this one. Why exactly, I don'y see any reason for closing this one, if you want it closed you can review it then I'll import and close :) Or we can swap roles again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226491] Merge Review: time In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112111.m0BLBOAV025545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226491 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide laroche at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From laroche at redhat.com 2008-01-11 16:11 EST ------- Seems current rpmlint is ok with the rpm package, so I am closing this bz. Thanks a lot for the review, Florian La Roche -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112113.m0BLDYcq025778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226143, which changed state. Bug 226143 Summary: Merge Review: mingetty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226143 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:13:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226143] Merge Review: mingetty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112113.m0BLDYXm025758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mingetty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226143 laroche at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From laroche at redhat.com 2008-01-11 16:13 EST ------- Current rpm package has the above patch applied plus also an url is now added. Thanks a lot for the review, Florian La Roche -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226228] Merge Review: pam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112116.m0BLGmrb026403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226228 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:16 EST ------- See below - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines See below - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a6472db4afe13850cb401922211bba4e ./Linux-PAM-0.99.8.1.tar.bz2 a6472db4afe13850cb401922211bba4e ./Linux-PAM-0.99.8.1.tar.bz2.1 6b5fc356fdbb0b7cdbbdc80419043cac ./Linux-PAM-0.99.8.1.tar.bz2.sign 6b5fc356fdbb0b7cdbbdc80419043cac ./Linux-PAM-0.99.8.1.tar.bz2.sign.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun OK - .so files in -devel subpackage. OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - .la files are removed. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 15 open bugs - check for outstanding bugs on package. Issues: 1. I see that upstream is named Linux-PAM. Perhaps consider re-naming it? 2. Might add a comment about why this package needs it's own private copy of the db package. 3. shouldn't the license of pam_tty_audit.c be GPLv2 per RedHat guidelines? 4. Can some of the tests and such be moved from the install section to a %test section? like the dlopen tests and so forth. 5. Might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL COPYING file too. 6. Why strip the binaries? # Forcibly strip binaries. strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/* ||: debuginfo should pull that out. 7. Might note that we can depreciate the pre/post hacks for USEMD5 after a while. 8. No need to require 'coreutils'. 9. 15 open bugs You might look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218063 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428444 in particular. 10. rpmlint says: pam.src:212: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR You should be able to remove the following lines from prep: cp %{SOURCE5} . cp %{SOURCE6} . cp %{SOURCE7} . Just refer to the sources directly when installing. Ignore: pam.src:246: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/security pam.src:327: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security pam.src: W: strange-permission dlopen.sh 0755 pam.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/pam_timestamp_check root 04755 pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/pam_timestamp_check 04755 pam.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/security/namespace.init pam.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/unix_update 0700 pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/unix_update 0700 pam.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/unix_chkpwd root 04755 pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/unix_chkpwd 04755 pam.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/security/opasswd 0600 pam.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/faillog pam.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.perms pam.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.perms.d/50-default.perms pam.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm pam.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/security/opasswd Fix if you like: pam.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 130, tab: line 137) 11. Might add a %{?_smp_mflags} to make? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:21:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112121.m0BLLOVt009122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From slevine at redhat.com 2008-01-11 16:21 EST ------- The name of the package does not affect what I need to do, so the there are no immediate ramifications to me if the name changes or stays the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112128.m0BLS6fH010084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112140.m0BLejsr030531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-11 16:40 EST ------- Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo) discussed this during the FUDCon Friday, Jan 11th 2008 meeting. FESCo strongly suggests changing the name due to the *-devel reason. Additionally, packaging guidelines will soon more explicitly spell out the rules regarding -devel. After a name change, it will be fairly easy to get this review done. There is broad agreement that this needs to be included in Fedora 9. Will this easily work on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 as well? What about RHEL5? (It could be added to EPEL5.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112144.m0BLi0ZU012842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:43 EST ------- Hans: Can you approve this package before cvs is completed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112146.m0BLkRkV031344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-11 16:46 EST ------- Done, I kept setting the approved flag bet because of sponsorship, but thats taken care of now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112149.m0BLnHDZ013640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 ------- Additional Comments From mcepl at redhat.com 2008-01-11 16:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Same question: Do AUTHORS and README belong in %doc, or not? Yes, they do. All those ALL-CAPS files should end up in %doc (except for INSTALL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:45:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112145.m0BLjbhZ013358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:45 EST ------- Please use Fedora Account System names? Reset fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112150.m0BLoIgE032081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:50 EST ------- Thanks. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112149.m0BLnWFA031602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112154.m0BLsFWl014348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:54 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:56:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428138] Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112156.m0BLudrB000362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: system-summary - A quick summary of system hardware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428138 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:56 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112159.m0BLxN8F015076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.4-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112159.m0BLxMYS015039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 16:59 EST ------- adanaxisgpl-1.2.4-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 21:59:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112159.m0BLx9oI000533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 16:59 EST ------- cvs done. (with corrected owner account name) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112202.m0BM2H7S001567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:02 EST ------- flawfinder-1.27-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112200.m0BM0pDT001323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.10.0c-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:00:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112200.m0BM0nkV015867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:00 EST ------- kmplayer-0.10.0c-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:02:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112202.m0BM271r016251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-11 17:02 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:02:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 330991] Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112202.m0BM2IYV016362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flawfinder - Examines C/C++ source code for security flaws https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=330991 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.27-3.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:05:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112205.m0BM5A2L002738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |20061120-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112205.m0BM59iM017883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:05 EST ------- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112208.m0BM8jsX018328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:08 EST ------- R-multtest-1.18.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-multtest' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:10:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226143] Merge Review: mingetty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112210.m0BMAVO2004104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mingetty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226143 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 17:10 EST ------- You should not close the review before the reviewer has set the fedora review flag to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:09:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426862] Review Request: scanmem - Simple interactive debugging utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112209.m0BM9LFj003394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scanmem - Simple interactive debugging utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426862 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:09 EST ------- scanmem-0.07-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update scanmem' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 400521] Review Request: qemu-launcher - A graphical front-end to Qemu virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112212.m0BMCSuv019481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qemu-launcher - A graphical front-end to Qemu virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400521 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:12 EST ------- qemu-launcher-1.7.4-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:10:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:10:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112210.m0BMA0CE018787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:09 EST ------- kmplayer-0.10.0c-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 309061] Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112216.m0BMGOIf006058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: adanaxisgpl - FPS game in 4 spatial dimensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309061 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:16 EST ------- adanaxisgpl-1.2.4-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:14:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226125] Merge Review: man-pages-it In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112214.m0BMEhCh005273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226125 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:14 EST ------- man-pages-it-2.65-7.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update man-pages-it' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 400911] Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112217.m0BMH4M2020801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400911 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:17 EST ------- libtheora-1.0beta2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:17:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 400911] Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112217.m0BMH6U9020834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pioneers - Turnbased board strategy game (colonize an island) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400911 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0beta2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112220.m0BMKFrY007285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-11 17:20 EST ------- The following build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=340117&name=build.log contains the text: + speed/example/example correct 123 Ok: det_of_minor Ok: det_by_minor Ok: det_by_lu Error: speed_test 1 tests failed. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.40577 (%check) These are correctness tests (not speed tests), but speed_test checks that speed tests results will be correct (hence in a way it is a speed test). It probably failed because the build system is busy doing lots of things. I am going to change the cppad.spec file so that it execludes speed_test. I have a question of a general nature about version numbers: I am currently debugging the build on one branch, F-8. When I get done, I expect to copy the changes over to the other branches and run them there. Should I use the same version number for all the branches, or should each branch use the lowest possible version number for that branch ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 400521] Review Request: qemu-launcher - A graphical front-end to Qemu virtual machines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112220.m0BMK2hU021705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qemu-launcher - A graphical front-end to Qemu virtual machines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400521 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:20 EST ------- qemu-launcher-1.7.4-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:23:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226125] Merge Review: man-pages-it In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112223.m0BMNxD3022820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: man-pages-it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226125 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:23 EST ------- man-pages-it-2.65-7.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update man-pages-it' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112221.m0BMLuGu022428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:21 EST ------- R-multtest-1.18.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-multtest' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:27:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112227.m0BMR828009743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:27 EST ------- tiresias-fonts-1.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:25:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 398341] Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112225.m0BMPGcw009202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts - Yanone Kaffeesatz decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398341 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:25 EST ------- yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts-20061120-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112226.m0BMQN27024135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-11 17:26 EST ------- tiresias-fonts-1.0-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:27:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:27:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 399881] Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112227.m0BMR9Ni024287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tiresias-fonts - Low-vision fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399881 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:34:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:34:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112234.m0BMYqow025748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 17:34 EST ------- I don't understand exactly why the __spec_install_post is redefined. It seems to me that brp-compress leaves dir as is. I have tried to remove the %define and things seems to be right. Prereq should be Requires(.). At least I think so, although this is not obvious with trigger/Requires(.) interactions. The manual gzip are bad. Of course they could be there for the comment above, that is avoiding gziping the dir file, but couldn't it be done more cleanly? Why are the xsl and dtd files removed? in the install-info scriptlets, install-info should figure out whether .gz is needed or not. Having the dir file %config is not very nice, given that it is not in sysconfdir. However I can't see any other way. I suggest using %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) There is a build dependency loop texinfo -> ncurses-devel -> gpm-devel -> install-info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:44:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112244.m0BMieVR027217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 17:44 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291429) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291429&action=view) fixes for the spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:46:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112246.m0BMkP6I027753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 17:46 EST ------- I have set the license to GPLv3+ in the spec file diff since it seems to me that everything is under this license. Also why not install the texinfo.tex and associated files from texinfo? They should always be more up to date than what comes from texlive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 22:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112249.m0BMnClm013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-11 17:49 EST ------- rpmlint warning that could be fixed texinfo.src:36: W: prereq-use bash texinfo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 90, tab: line 99) texinfo.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/texinfo-4.11/ChangeLog ignorable: info.i386: E: info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir info.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/share/info/dir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 23:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112341.m0BNfRjB020852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload-0.4 - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-11 18:41 EST ------- http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/preload/preload-0.4-4.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/preload/preload.spec It's the same spec and SRPM as previously since the glib2 error had nothing to do with preload in the sense that it wasn't preload's fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 23:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112345.m0BNjPE7021424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-11 18:45 EST ------- I have added myself as part of the group members but Matthias automatically has gotten ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 23:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112348.m0BNmSwM021580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew.| |edu) | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-11 18:48 EST ------- DBD::SQLite >= 1.13 is definitely needed by the test suite but won't be in Fedora anytime soon (see bug 245699). I've patched Makefile.PL to not insist on 1.13, as well as the test suite to skip those tests which fail under 1.12 (but not 1.13+). I've also patched DBIx::Class::StartupCheck to not complain unless perl is older than 5.8.9 AND the overload bug is present, as (AFAIK) this bug is no longer present in Fedora perl. Additional eyeballs on this are invited and welcome. SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class-0.08008-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBIx-Class.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 11 23:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:49:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801112349.m0BNnXbL003410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|245699 | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-11 18:49 EST ------- Also removing bug 245699 (update DBD::SQLite) as a blocker given the patches above, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 00:16:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:16:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427458] Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120016.m0C0G10I025320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudecgi - Library (C++ API) for reading CGI form data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427458 matt at rudeserver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 00:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:40:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120040.m0C0evp4010204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mmcallis at redhat.com 2008-01-11 19:40 EST ------- To demonstrate how naive and ignorant I am: what would happen if we kept using the name "documentation-devel" internally, but respun the package with a new name for Fedora (that would not get used internally)? - Murray. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 01:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120157.m0C1vYbF004905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-11 20:57 EST ------- Will change upon import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: librtfcomp Short Description: Library for reading of compressed RTF files Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 02:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120226.m0C2QH0J022867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-11 21:26 EST ------- The name is from the naming spec (with the additional proposal of specifying "kde4" to make it clear), it's ridiculously long indeed. Any better suggestion? (If so, we should fix the spec.) The unresolved symbol is definitely a bug, I'll need some time to debug it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 02:33:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120233.m0C2XYNt023560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-11 21:33 EST ------- Oh and for the .so name, KWin 4.0 uses kwin3_*.so plugin names for its own plugins too. I know it's silly, but I'm just doing what upstream does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 02:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:36:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120236.m0C2auau024095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-11 21:36 EST ------- Ick, I guess that explains why I'm seeing double entries in systemsettings (kde-4.0) with kdebase3 installed. doh. Looks like one more thing to omit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120319.m0C3J71v029464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428493 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:19:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] New: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Spreadsheet-ParseExcel- Simple/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple-1.04-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple.spec Description: This library provides a simple abstraction of the Spreadsheet::ParseExcel module, for a kinder, gentler interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:18:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] New: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Spreadsheet-WriteExcel- Simple/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple-1.04-1.fc8.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple.spec Description: This library provides a simple abstraction of the Spreadsheet::WriteExcel module, for a kinder, gentler method of creating simple single-sheet Excel documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:34:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120334.m0C3YJQn031625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:34 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291445) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291445&action=view) patch to specfile to fix some package review issues this patch to the specfile fixes some of the package review issues, and enables make check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:30:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120330.m0C3UtgY031328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:30 EST ------- Package review: - rpmlint checks return: sqlite-3.5.4-2.fc9.src.rpm - sqlite.src:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes sqlite3 sqlite.src:14: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes sqlite3-devel sqlite3 last appeared (AFAICT) in FC-3's extras. Since it's more than 3 releases old, we can drop this obsoletes. Also, the matching 'provides' are missing. sqlite.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 57, tab: line 11) Easy to fix. sqlite-devel-3.5.4-2.fc9.i386.rpm - sqlite-devel.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Development tools for the sqlite3 embeddable SQL database engine. * both of the above are fixed in the attached patch to the spec file. * sqlite-tcl-3.5.4-2.fc9.i386.rpm - sqlite-tcl.i386: W: no-documentation * Can probably be ignored sqlite-tcl.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tcl module for the sqlite3 embeddable SQL database engine. * fixed in attached patch sqlite-tcl.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/tcl8.5/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so sqlite-tcl.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/share/tcl8.5/sqlite3/libtclsqlite3.so * This is obviously wrong, they should be in /usr/lib - I'm not sure what to do to fix this properly, however. - package meets naming guidelines - Ok - license ( ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - Ok - Public Domain - spec file legible, in am. english - Ok - source matches upstream - Ok - package compiles on devel (x86) - Ok - no missing BR - Ok - no unnecessary BR - Ok - no locales - Ok - not relocatable - Ok - owns all directories that it creates - Ok - no duplicate files - Ok - permissions ok - Ok - %clean - Ok - macro use consistent - Ok - code, not content - Ok - no need for -docs - Ok - nothing in %doc affects runtime - Ok - no need for .desktop file - Ok - devel package ok - Ok - no .la files - removed in %install section - post/postun ldconfig ok - Ok - devel requires base package n-v-r - Ok - Tests are not run by default. * This is probably because several tests fail. I've enabled tests in the attached specfile patch, and included patches which fix or comment out the tests that fail. Someone needs to check to see why the failing tests are failing, and either fix the tests upstream, fix the bug upstream, or figure out why the tests fail for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120336.m0C3aI3d017598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:36 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291447) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291447&action=view) fix the bind test - NaN doesn't seem to be valid for a double column -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120337.m0C3bNV5017697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:37 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291448) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291448&action=view) fix io test - but I don't know why it was broken to begin with, so investigation is warrented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120335.m0C3ZKUn032090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:35 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291446) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291446&action=view) use .so instead of .la files when running tests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120342.m0C3gLi9000597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:42 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291449) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291449&action=view) printf formatting is broken for some reason -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120346.m0C3kbHv019187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120346.m0C3kLgg019121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-11 22:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > To demonstrate how naive and ignorant I am: what would happen if we kept using > the name "documentation-devel" internally, but respun the package with a new > name for Fedora (that would not get used internally)? Your RH-internal business is not of any importance and irrelevant to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:45:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120345.m0C3j1o5000783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-11 22:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291450) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291450&action=view) the format of this tcl error message changed. the test should be fixed, but I don't know tcl syntax enough to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120355.m0C3toI8002869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wart at kobold.org ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-01-11 22:55 EST ------- *** Bug 228782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 03:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 228782] Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120355.m0C3tolk002847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcl-html - HTML documentation for Tcl/Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228782 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-01-11 22:55 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 427264 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 05:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226074] Merge Review: libXft In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120525.m0C5P6FQ000523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226074 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 00:25 EST ------- I think you really really need to either give up your package maintainance or look how reviewing of other packages done. Are you not aware of rpmlint command? Haven't you seen rpmlint output I posted in comment #1? That really says packaging zero length files is packaging error. This is the reason Merge-review tickets got open as core packages never gone through any reviews and also packaging guidelines formed in recent years. Why should we make packages to install zero-length files on fedora system and increase unnecessary file listing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 05:25:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226077] Merge Review: libxkbfile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120525.m0C5PcYo015293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libxkbfile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226077 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 00:25 EST ------- I think you really really need to either give up your package maintainance or look how reviewing of other packages done. Are you not aware of rpmlint command? Haven't you seen rpmlint output I posted in comment #1? That really says packaging zero length files is packaging error. This is the reason Merge-review tickets got open as core packages never gone through any reviews and also packaging guidelines formed in recent years. Why should we make packages to install zero-length files on fedora system and increase unnecessary file listing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 05:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120533.m0C5Xbd5016194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 00:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #47) > I have a question of a general nature about version numbers: I am currently > debugging the build on one branch, F-8. When I get done, I expect to copy the > changes over to the other branches and run them there. Should I use the same > version number for all the branches, or should each branch use the lowest > possible version number for that branch ? > Well, the EVR (Epoch:Version:Release) must be kept in order that devel > F-8 > F-7. If current F-8 EVR is 20071229-5.fc8, then F-7 EVR must be smaller than 20071229-5.fc8 (20071229-5.fc7 is okay), and devel EVR must be larger than 20071229-5.fc8 (20071229-5.fc9 is okay). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 05:52:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120552.m0C5qlnR003916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-12 00:52 EST ------- This test is OK. It is checking the runtime environment for a specific pthread model and skips some subtests if it doesn't find the pthread model this it wants to test the behavior of. What is not OK with this package's spec (MUSTFIX): 1. %check ||: We want to see breakdowns in testsuites => remove the ||: 2. the "BuildRequires:" BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) seems sufficient. All others seem superfluous to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120602.m0C6249x019853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-12 01:02 EST ------- %check ||: is a no-go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120624.m0C6OPk4007889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 01:24 EST ------- thanks Ralf. Xavier, Can you please provide new updates SRPM that fix issues in above comment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120630.m0C6UJvj023742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120646.m0C6kjrn010831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 01:46 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url d70d682572f56a869046aeae32c5c650 Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/01..............ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=16, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.62 cusr + 0.05 csys = 0.67 CPU) exit 0 + Package perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple-1.04-1.fc9 => Provides: perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel::Simple) = 1.04 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(IO::Scalar) >= 1.126 perl(Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) >= 0.31 perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120648.m0C6mvRC025648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 07:01:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:01:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120701.m0C71tOb012840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 07:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120701.m0C71r8s012804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-12 02:01 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple Short Description: Simple single-sheet Excel document creator Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 06:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120659.m0C6xG4T012053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 01:59 EST ------- For 0.2.1-3: - If all plugins in -plugins subpackage are only dlopened, calling /sbin/ldconfig in %post(un) scriptlets (in -plugins subpackage) should not be needed. - README file has 0 size, which should usually be removed. - Would you have any reason to ship libtool .la file? (please check the section "Exclusion of Static Libraries" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines) Anyway, almost okay. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 09:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 389971] Review Request: diveintopython - The html book In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120907.m0C97hmD011241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: diveintopython - The html book https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=389971 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 09:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428250] Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120908.m0C980em011291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gpicview - A simple fast image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428250 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 09:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:45:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425872] Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120945.m0C9jkeR016989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kde4-decoration-native-quarticurve-kwin - Unofficial port of the Bluecurve KWin decoration to KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425872 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-12 04:45 EST ------- It turns out the "undefined symbol: _ZN7QPixmapC2ERK5QSizeNS_4TypeE" error actually came from building against Qt 4.3.3 and running with 4.4 TP1 (something which is supposed to work, I filed an issue report at Trolltech about the binary compatibility breakage), when running with Qt 4.3.3, this is not an issue (we discussed this on IRC). This leaves the issue of the package name: I'm OK with renaming the package to whatever it should be named, but what should I rename it to? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 09:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801120947.m0C9llrd002218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-12 04:47 EST ------- Seems that the sponsors hesitates to handle java applications in the absence of guidelines for these apps. And I, being a rookie as you, need to show some skills to get a sponsor. Make an informal review, that is. Licensing: The documentation refers to a "BSD-like" license defined in the file docs/LICENSE. It seems to be a specific scala license, not one of the "good" ones in wiki/Licensing. Missing build dependencies: update-mime-database shared-mime-info (post/postun) pkg-config pkgconfig svn subversion mock test fails on missing svn (subversion). After adding subversion it fails with: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96363: line 77: clean: command not found The placement of the post/postun scriptlets at the very end is unusual. Normal place is after the %install, why not stick to this? The package includes not only the upstream source tarball, but also the binary distribution tarball scala-2.6.1-final. This contains generated stuff (e. g., jar files) and raises issues whether all source is included according to wiki/Packaging/Guidelines. It definitely breaks wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java Package contains a devel subpackage, makes no sense in a java context and breaks wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java. devel contains a configuration file, belongs to another (sub) package? Discussion: seems that java packages requires a whole lot of copying in %install. Is this the right place, would it be better to use ant or make to clean up the spec file, to make it look more like a normal make-based spec-file? Is there any (other) good example of a packaged java-app out there? OK Rpmlint is silent OK Package name OK Spec file name. OK Licensing: BSD is OK (but see above). - License: tag matches Licensing in code - see above OK License included in doc - see above - Meets Packaging guidelines - see above. OK Spec file in American English: I'm from Sweden, but to my understanding... OK Spec file legible OK Source MD5sum: 34851e6b001955b169529397d499f17f upstream and in src.rpm OK Builds on i386 OK This is platform-independent java code. - Build dependencies - see above OK Locales management - n/a, this is java code OK Libraries - n/a OK Not relocateble - n/a OK Owns it's directories. OK No %file duplicates OK File permissions OK %clean target OK Consistent macro usage OK Code/permissive content (this is just code). OK Documentation is in separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 10:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121007.m0CA7RAu005471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-12 05:07 EST ------- Fixed in : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-Linux-Pid.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Linux-Pid-0.04-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 10:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121008.m0CA8fBj020305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-12 05:08 EST ------- Fixed in : http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SPECS/perl-XML-Xerces.spec http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 10:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 05:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121009.m0CA9lkI020405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-01-12 05:09 EST ------- I don't like the -docs subpackage idea. BTW, all the docs are available also on the portecle.sf.net website. I'm thinking about looking into what kind of patchwork would it be to install the docs to /usr/share/doc/$name-$version-$release and to have the Portecle online help system use them from there instead of from inside the jar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 12:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121239.m0CCdVxM007751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 07:39 EST ------- koji build failed with log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=344201&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 12:44:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121244.m0CCikfq008445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 07:44 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 130c4d299f827abf1f2285fddf03fccb Linux-Pid-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/basic.......ok t/import......ok t/threaded....ok 2/9 skipped: thread model is NPTL 2.7.90 All tests successful, 2 subtests skipped. Files=3, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.11 CPU) + Package perl-Linux-Pid-0.04-3.fc9 => Provides: Pid.so perl(Linux::Pid) = 0.04 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 12:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121253.m0CCroQ6027522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-12 07:53 EST ------- Thx Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Linux-Pid Short Description: Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 13:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121325.m0CDPAox014349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 08:25 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e5bd871026bee1b291c5634e6e4daf35 XML-Xerces-2.7.0-0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs All tests successful, 5 subtests skipped. Files=43, Tests=35542, 15 wallclock secs (11.82 cusr + 2.04 csys = 13.86 CPU) ==>Not sure about how to resolve skipped test. So I will approve this and if anyone feels these tests should not be skipped then once package gets inside CVS file bug against it. + Package perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.fc9 => Provides: Xerces.so perl(XML::Xerces) = 260.2 perl(XML::Xerces::AbstractDOMParser) perl(XML::Xerces::AttributeList) perl(XML::Xerces::Attributes) perl(XML::Xerces::ContentHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMAttr) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMBuilder) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMCDATASection) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMCharacterData) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMComment) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMDocument) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMDocumentFragment) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMDocumentRange) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMDocumentTraversal) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMDocumentType) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMElement) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMEntity) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMEntityReference) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMEntityResolver) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMErrorHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMException) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMImplementation) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMImplementationLS) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMImplementationRegistry) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMImplementationSource) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMLocator) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNamedNodeMap) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNode) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNodeFilter) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNodeIterator) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNodeList) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMNotation) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMProcessingInstruction) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMRange) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMRangeException) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMText) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMTreeWalker) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMWriter) perl(XML::Xerces::DOMWriterFilter) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDAttDef) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDAttDefList) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDElementDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDElementDeclEnumerator) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDEntityDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDEntityDeclEnumerator) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDGrammar) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::DTDValidator) perl(XML::Xerces::DeclHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::DefaultHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::DocumentHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::EntityResolver) perl(XML::Xerces::ErrorHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::Grammar) perl(XML::Xerces::HandlerBase) perl(XML::Xerces::InputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::LexicalHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::LocalFileFormatTarget) perl(XML::Xerces::LocalFileInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::Locator) perl(XML::Xerces::MemBufFormatTarget) perl(XML::Xerces::MemBufInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::PSVIHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::Parser) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlCallbackHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlContentCallbackHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlContentHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlDocumentCallbackHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlDocumentHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlEntityResolver) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlEntityResolverHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlErrorCallbackHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlErrorHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlNodeFilter) perl(XML::Xerces::PerlNodeFilterCallbackHandler) perl(XML::Xerces::QName) perl(XML::Xerces::SAX2XMLReader) perl(XML::Xerces::SAXException) perl(XML::Xerces::SAXNotRecognizedException) perl(XML::Xerces::SAXNotSupportedException) perl(XML::Xerces::SAXParseException) perl(XML::Xerces::SAXParser) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaAttDef) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaAttDefList) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaElementDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaElementDeclEnumerator) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaGrammar) perl(XML::Xerces::SchemaValidator) perl(XML::Xerces::StdInInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::StdOutFormatTarget) perl(XML::Xerces::URLInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::Wrapper4DOMInputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::Wrapper4InputSource) perl(XML::Xerces::Writer) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLAttDef) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLAttDefList) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLCatalogResolver) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLDTDDescription) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLDeleter) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLElementDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLEntityDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLException) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLExcepts) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLGrammarDescription) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLNotationDecl) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLPScanToken) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLPlatformUtils) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLReaderFactory) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLSchemaDescription) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLSimple) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLURL) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLUni) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLUri) perl(XML::Xerces::XMLValidator) perl(XML::Xerces::XercesDOMParser) perl(XML::Xercesc) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libxerces-c.so.27 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 13:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121353.m0CDrCNK003146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-12 08:53 EST ------- Trying to do my homework. Reviewed #428410, made some remarks on #428435, reviewed #426867. Learned a few things, updated the spec file. And now I really need a sponsor :-) New URL:s! SRPM: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind-0.9.0-2.fc8.src.rpm Spec: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:14:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121414.m0CEEHhs020943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: poppler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |428509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121418.m0CEIfsb021660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121418.m0CEI93F021608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-12 09:18 EST ------- Thx Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Xerces Short Description: Perl API to Xerces XML parser Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:18:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121418.m0CEIEVn006952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 09:18 EST ------- Add missing BR: libxml2-devel expat-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121434.m0CEYADQ008846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-01-12 09:34 EST ------- (Please note I can only do pre-reviews, so someone else needs to approve this package) Feedback for gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2-1: MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint gnome-nds-thumbnailer.spec $ rpmlint gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm gnome-nds-thumbnailer.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-nds-thumbnailer.schemas This warning can be ignored for gconf schemas OK! - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK! - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK! - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. %config(noreplace) should be used instead on plain %config. However, I don't know for sure if this rule also applies to GConf schemas. Unknown - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK! - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Negative, spec file has license 'GPLv2' while the files COPYING and gnome-nds-thumbnailer.c from the tarball are 'GPLv2+' - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK! - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK! - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK! - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2.tar.bz2 316e43eb66828addae64038372c59ab9 gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2.tar.bz2 $ curl --silent http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnome-nds-thumbnailer/1.0/gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2.md5sum | grep gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2.tar.bz2 316e43eb66828addae64038372c59ab9 gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2.tar.bz2 OK! - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on Rawhide/Fedora 9 i386 and mock/Fedora 8 i386 OK! - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Unable to test on other arches - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Building in mock returns this error: checking for gconftool-2... no configure: error: gconftool-2 is needed See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.58503 (%build) Negative, BuildRequires: GConf2 needs to be added to the spec file - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Package doesn't use locales OK! - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. Package doesn't contain shared libraries OK! - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Not applicable OK! - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. Not applicable OK! - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK! - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK! - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK! - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Negative, Please use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. Package contains only code, no further content OK! - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Not applicable OK! - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK! - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Not applicable OK! - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. Not applicable OK! - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Not applicable OK! - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Not applicable OK! - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Not applicable OK! - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. Not applicable OK! - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Package is a console only package, so there is no .desktop file OK! - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK! - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK! - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK! SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Source package contains COPYING file containing the license OK! - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Description and summary contain only English text OK! - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. Negative, see the MUST: BuildRequires - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Unable to test - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. $ gnome-nds-thumbnailer Expects an input and an output file $ gnome-nds-thumbnailer --help Usage: gnome-nds-thumbnailer [OPTION...] [FILE...] Thumbnail Nintendo DS ROMs Help Options: -?, --help Show help options Application Options: -s, --size Size of the thumbnail in pixels --g-fatal-warnings Make all warnings fatal OK! - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Scriplets are used to install the GConf schemas. This all looks sane OK! - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Package doesn't contain any subpackages OK! - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. Package doesn't contain pkgconfig files OK! - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. Not applicable OK! ----- Conclusion: - License tag needs to be changed to GPLv2+ - BuildRequires: GConf2 needs to be added - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT needs to be changed to %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 14:59:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121459.m0CEx2Wt026930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-12 09:59 EST ------- Actually these should be pulled in by wbxml2-devel... I fixed it. wbxml2-0.9.2-12.fc9 currently building for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=344368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426561] Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121507.m0CF76On028763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoqo - GeoCaching and General Waypoint Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426561 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:07 EST ------- Closing this Review ticket as this package is successfully built on koji for requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:07:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427342] Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121507.m0CF7mtT028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jday - A simple command to convert calendar dates to julian dates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427342 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:07 EST ------- Closing this Review ticket as this package is successfully built on koji for requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121509.m0CF9M0u028879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #291414|0 |1 is obsolete| | ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-01-12 10:09 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291466) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291466&action=view) spec file for NNTPGrab, with feedback from comment #3 0.2.1-4: - Removed the %post{,un} scriptlets for the -plugins subpackage - Removed README file from %doc as it is a zero-byte file - Removed the .la file from the -devel subpackage New srpm at http://www.nntpgrab.nl/fedora/nntpgrab-0.2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- I've also just reviewed #427669, created a Fedora account (username 'epienbro'), signed the CLA and added myself to the roles 'cvsextras' and 'fedorabugs'. Is there anything else I need to do now or do I need to wait for your approval? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121507.m0CF7anX013506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 Bug 427482 depends on bug 427481, which changed state. Bug 427481 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:08:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427514] Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121508.m0CF8IEF013555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libnova - Libnova is a general purpose astronomy & astrodynamics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427514 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:08 EST ------- Closing this Review ticket as this package is successfully built on koji for requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:07:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121507.m0CF7ZL8013445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 mhideo at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-12 10:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #46) > Your RH-internal business is not of any importance and irrelevant to Fedora. I understand. Many apologies to all for the distraction. - Mike ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121514.m0CFE7dK029573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:14 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427300] Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121513.m0CFDP8E014281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-kerberos - A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427300 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:13 EST ------- Closing this Review ticket as this package is successfully built on koji for requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:17:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 420161] Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121517.m0CFHkO1014898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-bugzilla - A python library for interacting with Bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420161 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:17 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225704] Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121520.m0CFK8AL030609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: docbook-style-xsl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225704 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121526.m0CFQPZs016359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-12 10:26 EST ------- > Your RH-internal business is not of any importance and irrelevant to Fedora. While this is technically true, this could have been written in a more tactful and sensitive way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121525.m0CFPKMH016262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-12 10:25 EST ------- The builds of cppad-20071229-6 appears to have been successful on all the branches; i.e., F-7, F-8, and devel; see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=344386 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=344323 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=344366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:23:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427482] Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121523.m0CFN38t015668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-Fedora - Fedora Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 Bug 427482 depends on bug 427481, which changed state. Bug 427481 Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121523.m0CFN2Nv015608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|CANTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-12 10:23 EST ------- WAIT!!! This doesn't mean CANTFIX. Simply rename the package. This is important to get into Fedora 9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121528.m0CFSSEr016604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:28 EST ------- Michael, Any reason to CLOSE this as CANTFIX? You just need to come up with some good name that will not contain -devel and simply rename Summary here and submit package for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 15:51:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:51:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121551.m0CFpnhR002101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 10:51 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6a1181b7be09ba69fe6768a0f6156416 pywbxml-0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package pywbxml-0.1-1.fc9 => Provides: pywbxml.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libwbxml2.so.0 libxml2.so.2 python(abi) = 2.5 SHOULD: Change source URL to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/synce/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 16:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:04:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121604.m0CG4UwQ003964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-12 11:04 EST ------- Will change upon import. Thanks yet again for another review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pywbxml Short Description: Python wrapper for wbxml2 Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 16:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121646.m0CGkbGE027030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4 at yahoo.fr 2008-01-12 11:46 EST ------- pong, sorry about that I have been busy the past days New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fprint_demo Short Description: Demo of the fprint drivers Owners: pingou Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 16:58:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:58:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121658.m0CGwDS7028303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 11:58 EST ------- Okay. - This package itself is okay - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (nntpgrab) is APPROVED by me -------------------------------------------------------------------- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow the procedure according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 17:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121728.m0CHSpbw014921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 12:28 EST ------- Okay. Then for F-7 and F-8 please request to push cppad to stable or testing repository using bodhi system and close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 17:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427060] Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121746.m0CHkXpE002318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dot2tex - A Graphviz to LaTeX converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427060 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 12:46 EST ------- Well, for 2.7.0-2: * non-executable-script rpmlint -------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint dot2tex dot2tex.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/dot2tex/dot2tex.py 0644 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -I non-executable-script non-executable-script : This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. -------------------------------------------------------------- - This file (dot2tex.py) has shebangs but does not have executable permission. For this file it seems that shebangs should be removed. * Documents - Are files under doc/ directory or examples/ directory not useful for documents? Please consider to add them as %doc. Then as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 18:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121801.m0CI1MK3004522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 13:01 EST ------- How about create a new GPG key for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 17:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121757.m0CHvwH6003790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(pablo.martin- | |gomez at laposte.net) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 12:57 EST ------- Build seems okay. For F-8 and F-7 branches, please request to push kitsune to stable or testing repository using bodhi system, then close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 19:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121926.m0CJQBBb030979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-01-12 14:26 EST ------- I'll review this package. Some quick remarks - you should drop #ifdefs for FC-6 since its no longer supported. Another one note - I think we should update hostapd up to 0.6.2 (latest devel release). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 19:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121929.m0CJT15U016362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at gmail.com 2008-01-12 14:29 EST ------- Also you should drop mac80211 and wpa_supplicant from package - I think they no longer needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 19:38:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121938.m0CJckgk032345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 lemenkov at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 19:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801121942.m0CJglFB018259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-12 14:42 EST ------- please don't start review... It is aimed for coordination of efforts and testing use only... The last attempt was here: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/testing/8/SRPMS/hostapd-0.6.1-1.kwizart.fc8.src.rpm This package isn't ready since the mac80211 part for master mode will not be stabilized until 2.6.25 kernels (at least, as said linville). As such there is still missings headers. Maybe we could ask linville to have a testing kernel for such attemps (because there is also a need to test some special patches for master mode.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122034.m0CKYe1b025477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:39:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122039.m0CKdVcM008127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:39 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:36:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122036.m0CKa7IP007901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:36 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122037.m0CKbmYX008009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:37 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:41:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122041.m0CKfIJQ026671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:41 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:42:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122042.m0CKgroO008764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-12 15:42 EST ------- Can we use the name "Excel" here? It's a registered trademark I think... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:52:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428352] Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122052.m0CKqOss028084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-idm-console: Fedora branded Java console for Fedora Directory Server Alias: fedora-idm-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428352 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-12 15:52 EST ------- ill take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122053.m0CKr9ua010168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-admin-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-12 15:53 EST ------- ill take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122053.m0CKraX5028308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-12 15:53 EST ------- ill take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:52:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428357] Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122052.m0CKqixP028219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428357 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-12 15:52 EST ------- ill take this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 20:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428357] Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122058.m0CKwwVt011009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds-console: Fedora Directory Server Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428357 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-12 15:58 EST ------- Looks good to me Approved builds cleanly in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 21:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122118.m0CLIwcb014121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From mastahnke at gmail.com 2008-01-12 16:18 EST ------- http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-libgmail-docs.spec http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-libgmail-docs-0.3-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 22:40:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122240.m0CMePGQ024943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-12 17:40 EST ------- Robin, the Fedora-review flag should be set to "-" only if a package has fundamental flaws and the review should deny it. As long as a package is under review, the flag should be "?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:02:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:02:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122302.m0CN24SC027761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-12 18:02 EST ------- Um... That is last way, I think. But I'll try it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:18:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122318.m0CNIVaI015140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-01-12 18:18 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nntpgrab Short Description: Usenet download program Owners: epienbro Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: epienbro Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122342.m0CNguvP018344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-12 18:42 EST ------- Missing dependency of Mock for my x86_64 environment are caused from this other error of Mock ...Metadata file does not match checksum. Trying other mirror... I added also a dev repository in fedora-development-x86_64 mock config file, but same problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427526] Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122348.m0CNmZTr000902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:48:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122348.m0CNmawc000927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 Bug 428361 depends on bug 427526, which changed state. Bug 427526 Summary: Review Request: librtfcomp - Library for reading of compressed RTF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427526 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 12 23:55:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801122355.m0CNt2s8001949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-12 18:55 EST ------- I succeeded!! Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 00:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:04:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428360] Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130004.m0D04w4Z003309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 00:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:04:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130004.m0D04xtn003333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 Bug 428361 depends on bug 428360, which changed state. Bug 428360 Summary: Review Request: pywbxml - Python wrapper for wbxml2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428360 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 00:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130018.m0D0IAEL022925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-12 19:18 EST ------- maybe there is a problem with the mirror which is configured in your /etc/mock/fedora-devel-x86_64.cfg try to replace mirrorlist with a direct URL to a known godd mirror, similar to my config below (search for a mirror close to you! ): [fedora] name=fedora #mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide&arch=x86_64 baseurl=ftp://ftp.gts.lug.ro/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 00:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130024.m0D0OgDL023562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-12 19:24 EST ------- known *good* mirror (of course) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 01:03:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130103.m0D139WY028528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-12 20:03 EST ------- koji build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=344975&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 01:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426599] Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130133.m0D1XAJ0014474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libgdl - Components and library for GNOME development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426599 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-12 20:33 EST ------- Debarshi: Once you've EOLed anjuta-gdl as per comment #9, can you please close this bug as NEXTRELEASE? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 01:30:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130130.m0D1Ucfx014291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2008-01-12 20:30 EST ------- Just sent Matthias a private e-mail (which I Cc'ed you on) to ask him to release the package. Hopefully he'll be more likely to read that than bugzilla/packagedb spam -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 01:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 20:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426611] Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130158.m0D1wVgD017493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426611 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-01-12 20:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > wrt .desktop file: out of my area, never wrote one before; I tried to > look at the equivalent gitk package for a model, but it doesn't have > one either. Other packages not following the Packaging Guidelines is not an excuse imho. In fact, adding a .desktop file isn't that complicated, attaching a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426611] Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130200.m0D200iP002780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426611 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny at gmx.de 2008-01-12 20:59 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291485) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291485&action=view) Add an icon and a .desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426611] Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130217.m0D2HUPv005481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotone-viz - gtk visualizer for monotone revision graphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426611 ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-01-12 21:17 EST ------- Thanks! I've integrated the .desktop file into the srpm and uploaded a new version to the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130218.m0D2IpcR005547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-12 21:18 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Jan 13 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 22.84.13-2 - Add patch to build against system kpathsea rather than the one in the tarball - Same patch also removes all includes to the t1lib headers shipped in the tarball to prevent conflicts with system t1lib-devel - Spefile cleanups Builds fine in mock, doesn't seem to give rpmlint errors or warnings. Therefore, it's ready for review. One thing a reviewer might check is where I've put the documentation - it's unclear if docs should go in /usr/share/doc or /usr/share/texmf/doc. I favour the former, since that's where docs for all other packages go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130219.m0D2Jmi0020289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-12 21:19 EST ------- Oh, I should also say, I don't actually have a rawhide installation to check this runs on, so any testing of the built packages would be much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:44:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130244.m0D2iZe0008684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 21:44 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please proceed following "Join" wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:45:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130245.m0D2jCRA023613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 21:45 EST ------- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please proceed following "Join" wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 02:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 21:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428545] New: Review Request: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CDs and DVDs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428545 Summary: Review Request: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CDs and DVDs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog-0.3.2.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Catalog your dvds/cds and files in your hard disk. Generate thumbnails of the video files and image files via nautilus (gnome file manager), and saves it in the database files. Save the metadata of the files, then you can search in the metatada of music and images. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 03:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130301.m0D31c6W011263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-12 22:01 EST ------- I have created an update for F-7 using the bodhi web interface; see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/pending/cppad-20071229-6.fc7 I think that the next step is to push to stable, but I do not see how that is done using the web interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 03:22:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130322.m0D3MHRT028372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-12 22:22 EST ------- You can "edit" the bodhi request to make cppad pushed to stable. Also, please request also for F-8 bodhi on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 04:09:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:09:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428549] New: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roland at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/roland/tmp/trac-monotone-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/roland/tmp/trac-monotone-plugin-0.0.11-1.20080112mtn.fc9.src.rpm Description: This Trac plugin provides support for the Monotone SCM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 04:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130450.m0D4oRFZ024850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-01-12 23:50 EST ------- Thanks for taking a look at my package, it looks like you might not have tried the latest release (5) since I fixed some of the issues you pointed out in that release. > skills to get a sponsor. Make an informal review, that is. Yeah, I know I've got to do that but my day job has been keeping me too busy lately. > Licensing: The documentation refers to a "BSD-like" license defined in the file > docs/LICENSE. It seems to be a specific scala license, not one of the "good" > ones in wiki/Licensing. I checked on fedora-legal about this (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2007- December/msg00012.html) and got confirmation that the license is OK and to use BSD for the license tag. > > Missing build dependencies: > update-mime-database shared-mime-info (post/postun) I took the post/postun directly from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head- 5f93ed83c968bb73b052c06ba0d7139e28f35d93 The script is such that it will not fail if shared-mime- info is not installed > pkg-config pkgconfig > svn subversion > > mock test fails on missing svn (subversion). After adding subversion it fails > with: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96363: line 77: clean: command not found These should be fixed in release 5 > The placement of the post/postun scriptlets at the very end is unusual. Normal > place is after the %install, why not stick to this? That's a good idea. I'm not sure how/why they ended up down there > The package includes not only the upstream source tarball, but also the binary > distribution tarball scala-2.6.1-final. This contains generated stuff (e. g., > jar files) and raises issues whether all source is included according to > wiki/Packaging/Guidelines. It definitely breaks wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java It is kind of an akward situation. As far as I can figure that is the only way to get some things (documentation, scripts, etc) for a specific release. Would you recommend to erase the binary components of the unpacked binary tarball as part of the prep to make sure that the binary components don't end up installed by the RPM? > Package contains a devel subpackage, makes no sense in a java context and breaks > wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java. devel contains a configuration file, belongs to > another (sub) package? I think that this package is a little different since it is actually a language compiler and runtime not just a library. The devel package contains the configuration to allow using scala from ant and the runtime source code (which I'm not sure about packaging, but it is included in a standard scala distribution) > Discussion: seems that java packages requires a whole lot of copying in > %install. Is this the right place, would it be better to use ant or make to > clean up the spec file, to make it look more like a normal make-based spec-file? > Is there any (other) good example of a packaged java-app out there? I think the big problem here is that most java applications/libraries do not concern themselves with installation and even if they do don't match up with the jpackage conventions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 07:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130728.m0D7SgVf026469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From gc at pps.jussieu.fr 2008-01-13 02:28 EST ------- Any progress on this bug? It blocks bug #241487 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 07:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226073] Merge Review: libXfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130743.m0D7hqep013973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226073 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 02:43 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is ok to accept libXfont.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs libXfont.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs libXfont.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs libXfont.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs libXfont.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel libXfont.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel libXfont-devel.i386: W: no-documentation libXfont-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel libXfont-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel + source match upstream b2f396b62633819bbdd9748383876e21 libXfont-1.3.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xfont.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Package libXfont-1.3.1-2.fc9 => Provides: libXfont.so.1 Requires: libXfont.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfontenc.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libz.so.1 + Package ibXfont-devel-1.3.1-2.fc9 => Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem >= 0.99.2-3 Requires: libXfont = 1.3.1-2.fc9 libXfont.so.1 libfontenc-devel pkgconfig xorg-x11-proto-devel + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 07:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226072] Merge Review: libXfontcache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130749.m0D7nWuU014563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXfontcache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226072 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 02:49 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is ok to accept libXfontcache.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs libXfontcache.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs libXfontcache.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs libXfontcache.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs libXfontcache.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel libXfontcache.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel libXfontcache-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel libXfontcache-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel + source match upstream 1adca018aa7bf2d215f20a69c10828ad libXfontcache-1.0.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xfontcache.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Package libXfontcache-1.0.4-4.fc9 => Provides: libXfontcache.so.1 Requires: libX11.so.6 libXext.so.6 libXfontcache.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package libXfontcache-devel-1.0.4-4.fc9 => Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem >= 0.99.2-3 Requires: libXfontcache = 1.0.4-4.fc9 libXfontcache.so.1 pkgconfig xorg-x11-proto-devel + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 08:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 425834] Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130844.m0D8ix8k003376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: portecle - Multipurpose keystore and certificate tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425834 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2008-01-13 03:44 EST ------- I meant to say that I'll look into the patchwork mentioned in comment 6 if you think it's necessary to get the package approved - personally I think this is fine as is. Let me know if you consider it a blocker; I'm leaving the package as is until then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 08:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:53:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130853.m0D8rON9022875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From hmandevteam at gmail.com 2008-01-13 03:53 EST ------- i have always this response :( Error: Missing Dependency: mktemp is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/perl is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/bash is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Getopt::Long) is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package redhat-rpm-config Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/sh is needed by package fedora-release-notes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 09:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:16:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130916.m0D9GM5d027260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 sundaram at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From sundaram at redhat.com 2008-01-13 04:16 EST ------- Is it the plan to replace vixie cron with this by default in Fedora 9? If so, following the feature process would be appropriate http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 09:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130925.m0D9P0gA006916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-13 04:25 EST ------- Sorry for the inconvenience. Missing BR python-setuptools http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-sync-engine-0.11-2.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=345108 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 09:48:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130948.m0D9mm4R010083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 axel.thimm at atrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm at atrpms.net 2008-01-13 04:48 EST ------- The resolve is that these (small) libs were never intended to be shared (and used by anything else but myildrop itself) - autotooling the project just popped out the --enable-shared option. There are two ways to fix it: o patch up the sources to really allow shared libs - but upstream is not interested in doing so - they might actually even shut down shared libs in general. o go static I think I prefer the latter, would you agree? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 09:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 04:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241596] Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801130952.m0D9q367010767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u- | |tokyo.ac.jp) | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 04:52 EST ------- I prefer to go static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 10:26:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131026.m0DAQsTw015875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-13 05:26 EST ------- OK. Some responses - Yes, I used the "old" version :-(. The new one is OK for svn and pkg-config - Even though the post/postun scriptlets does not fail if update-mime-database is missing, I don't see any reason not to add a dependency for them to ensure that installation works as intended. - I don't really have the competence to give advice on this. But it feels strange, is there really stuff in the binaries which is not generated from the source? If so, I think the way to go is to strip down this binary to a very minimun before it's shipped. This should also clarify the situation upstream, where it ought to be handled. - If this subpackage with a configuration file is needed, maybe it should be renamed? - Good point on installation issues! Cheers! --ALec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 10:30:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131030.m0DAUhu6002489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 05:30 EST ------- rpmlint gave me synce-sync-engine.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency librtfcomp-python You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. synce-sync-engine.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. synce-sync-engine.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxslt-python You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. synce-sync-engine.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.11.-2 0.11-2.fc9 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. synce-sync-engine.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided libopensync-plugin-synce If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. synce-sync-engine.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 10:34:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131034.m0DAYMob002713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-13 05:34 EST ------- PS: Perhaps it would be an idea to include a short comment about your license check w fedora-legal in the spec file? After all, someone else might start to wonder about this.. DS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 10:49:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 05:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131049.m0DAn0Ik018666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-13 05:48 EST ------- The first three errors can be ignored because rpmlint just looks at the lib* prefix. In this case the packages are -python bindings which are runtime only dependencies and thus the explicit require is what is needed. Changelog entry is a typo. I can fix it now or after the review whatever you like. The obsolete is ok imho. As the last warning sentence from rpmlint says: "If it is not compatible...". In this case it provides some of the same capabilities (namely the opensync plugin) but is in itself a much bigger package providing the whole engine and a completely different versioning etc so this imho is ok. /usr/lib vs. /usr/share error is irrelevant because opensync plugins are placed there... Hope this clears up the situation. Really some corner cases here which screw up 'normal' rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 11:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:02:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131102.m0DB21bu020661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail.ru 2008-01-13 06:02 EST ------- nogravity-2.00-4.fc9.src.rpm does not contain the fix. [3|zap at zap|~/rpm]cat SOURCES/nogravity.sh #!/bin/bash if [ `glxinfo | grep "direct rendering: " | cut -d " " -f 3` != Yes ]; then exec nogravity-software "$@" else exec nogravity-opengl "$@" fi P.S. Tried intuitively http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/nogravity-2.00-5.fc9.src.rpm and it's the one with the fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 11:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 06:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131128.m0DBSIZT024171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl 2008-01-13 06:28 EST ------- Bah, copy and paste error, indeed the last version and the one to review is: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/nogravity.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/nogravity-2.00-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 12:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:05:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] New: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint-0.5.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Mypaint is a fast and easy/simple painter app focused on the painter, so you can only focus on the art and not the program itself. Currently MyPaint does not have a layer system, also mypaint is using pygtk with C extensions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 13:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131309.m0DD9Gr7004857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 masahase at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-13 08:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pards Short Description: A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization Owners: masahase Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 13:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131307.m0DD7bcg022942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 masahase at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-13 08:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: linux-igd Short Description: The Linux UPNP Internet GATEWAY DEVICE Owners: masahase Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 13:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131352.m0DDqbWs010300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 08:52 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 13:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:56:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131356.m0DDuChV010913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-13 08:56 EST ------- When I select Edit from the web page https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/pending/cppad-20071229-6.fc7 I do not see a way to select "push", the fields I see are listed below. In addition, I am uncertain as to the meaning of the "Close Bugs when update is stable" check box, does this mean it will close the cppad review request bug ? Package: a one line text entry field. Add another build: a button type field. Release: a select from a list field. Type: a select from a list field. Request: a select from a list field. Bugs: a one line text entry field. Close Bugs when update is stable: a check box. Notes: a multiple line text entry field. Suggest Reboot: a check box. Save Update: a push button. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] New: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at deadbabylon.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/dragonplayer/dragonplayer.spec SRPM URL: http://svahl.fedorapeople.org/dragonplayer/dragonplayer-2.0-0.1.beta1.fc8.src.rpm Description: A simple video player for KDE 4. Features: * Simple interface that does not get in the way * Resumes where you left off when replaying a video * Support for subtitles Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=345354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] New: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: debarshi.ray at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-build.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/gnome-build-0.2.0-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: GNOME build framework provides the project management components of the development environment. This includes management of source-code resources, generation of makefiles, and build management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:09:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:09:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131409.m0DE9jD3012865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 09:09 EST ------- Thanks. I will not go with detailed review here But do have suggestions SHOULD: 1) Source URL should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/synce/sync-engine-%{version}.tar.gz 2) License is GPLv2+ 3) I don't think you need => CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" in %build APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131419.m0DEJQA7014087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |428567 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:19:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131419.m0DEJRep014107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428568 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:14:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] New: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/ETL/ETL.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/ETL/ETL-devel-0.04.10-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: ETL is a multi-platform class and template library designed to add new datatypes and functions which combine well with the existing types and functions from the C++ Standard Template Library (STL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:15:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428566] Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131415.m0DEFnMN013904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build - GNOME build framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428566 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray at gmail.com 2008-01-13 09:15 EST ------- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=345255 I inherited this package from Paul F. Johnson, and need help with some of the Perl specific portions of this package. My knowledge of Perl is very rudimentary, so any help in this regard will be appreciated. I find that the Spec file (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/gnome-build/devel/gnome-build.spec?view=markup) contains: Provides: perl(GBF::Make) [...] cat << \EOF > %{name}-prov #!/bin/sh %{__perl_provides} $* |\ sed -e '/perl(Make)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Target)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Rule::Vars)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Rule)/d' EOF %define __perl_provides %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-prov chmod +x %{__perl_provides} cat << \EOF > %{name}-req #!/bin/sh %{__perl_requires} $* |\ sed -e '/perl(Make)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Target)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Rule::Vars)/d' \ -e '/perl(Make::Rule)/d' EOF %define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-req chmod +x %{__perl_requires} However, in the %files section does not put anything in /usr/lib/perl5. So what is the use of these lines? There are some rpmlint grumblings due to this portion, which I will fix in due course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:18:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428568] New: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: marc at mwiriadi.id.au QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/synfig/synfig.spec SRPM URL: http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/synfig/synfig-0.61.07-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: It is designed to be capable of producing feature-film quality animation. It eliminates the need for tweening, preventing the need to hand-draw each frame. synfig features spatial and temporal resolution independence (sharp and smoothat any resolution or framerate), high dynamic range images, and a flexible plugin system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131440.m0DEe0l0001809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 09:39 EST ------- "Close bugs when update is stable" is used when the requested rpms resolves the issues reported on the corresponding bugs. For example, see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-0517 As far as I see your cppad F-7 request it is correct. So please request for F-8 cppad also and close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 14:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:53:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225793] Merge Review: gftp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131453.m0DErINO018162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gftp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225793 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-13 09:53 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. FIX - Spec has consistant macro usage. Don't use %makeinstall macro OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 44b19442d06f6dc68c7211d66029d826 gftp-2.0.18.tar.bz2 44b19442d06f6dc68c7211d66029d826 gftp-2.0.18.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file should change vendor to fedora OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. FIX - No rpmlint output. see issue #1 SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. SRPM: gftp.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/gftp-2.0.18-1.fc9.src.rpm.7432/gftp.spec - The character encoding of the spec file is not UTF-8. Convert it for example using iconv(1). gftp.src:142: W: macro-in-%changelog prefix - in changelog entries use %% instead of % gftp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 55, tab: line 57) - Fix if you like gftp.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog - The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8. RPM: gftp.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1:2.0.18-1 2:2.0.18-1.fc9 - The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. - Since this package has the history it does it is not possible to fix this gftp.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog - The character encoding of the value of this tag is not UTF-8. 2. Do not use %makeinstall macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 15:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131508.m0DF8CZP020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 bradbell at seanet.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From bradbell at seanet.com 2008-01-13 10:08 EST ------- The web page for the F-8 update is https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/pending/cppad-20071229-6.fc8 I am closing this bug as NEXTRELEASE. Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 15:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131515.m0DFFQ0k006660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2008-01-13 10:15 EST ------- Thanks I will change the shoulds on import as usual. Thanks to your patience fedora users will now be able to enjoy synce related things again so THANKS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: synce-sync-engine Short Description: Synce synchronization engine Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 15:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131541.m0DFfc1K024223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-13 10:41 EST ------- It looks like this has been built for rawhide and F8. Did you intend to build for F7 as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 15:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131539.m0DFdhkX023710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 10:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > The package includes not only the upstream source tarball, but also the binary > > distribution tarball scala-2.6.1-final. This contains generated stuff (e. g., > > jar files) and raises issues whether all source is included according to > > wiki/Packaging/Guidelines. It definitely breaks wiki/PackagingDrafts/Java > > It is kind of an akward situation. As far as I can figure that is the only way to get some things > (documentation, scripts, etc) for a specific release. Would you recommend to erase the binary > components of the unpacked binary tarball as part of the prep to make sure that the binary > components don't end up installed by the RPM? We surely request to do so. For example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/xml-commons-which/xml-commons-which.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 15:52:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427674] Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131552.m0DFqUC6010669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: themonospot -application that can be used to scan an avi file and extract some informations about audio and video data flow https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427674 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-13 10:52 EST ------- Let's take it off bugzilla, we are fading away of the review (which I cannot do formally anyway because you need a sponsor). However I am willing to help you , so please get in touch in me either on IRC/freenode.net (I am wolfy over there) or send me by email your yum and mock configurations (the descriptions of Base and Updates from /etc/yum.repos.d/ and also /etc/mock/fedora-devel-x86_64.cfg) and I'll take a look. And speaking of sponsorship, did you read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131607.m0DG7bWX012817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-13 11:07 EST ------- I was typing up a review but didn't get to finish before the we had to leave the hackfest. I have it saved, but if Patrice would like to review this then I'm more than happy to step aside and work on something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:25:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226488] Merge Review: texinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131625.m0DGPgdg015124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: texinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226488 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-13 11:25 EST ------- Tibbs, when I saw that you assigned yourself to the review, since I am interested in texinfo and I guess that you have already plenty other things to do I decided to take the time to do as much as possible of the review, such that you can do other reviews if you want to. Still if you have other comments, feel free to share... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131628.m0DGSP99029981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 11:28 EST ------- Also, would you explain in detail why SOURCE3 is needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 331731] OLD CANCELED ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131628.m0DGSsFV030030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: OLD CANCELED ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Summary|Review Request: ltsp-server |OLD CANCELED ltsp-server - |- LTSP5 server-side |LTSP5 server-side |configurations and setup |configurations and setup |scripts |scripts ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-13 11:28 EST ------- This package is being thrown out, a new package is being made based upon upstream. Keeping this on the tracker only because it contains many notes that might be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 336911] OLD CANCELED ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131629.m0DGTcgf015287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: OLD CANCELED ltsp-client - Linux Terminal Server Project client programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=336911 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Summary|Review Request: ltsp-client |OLD CANCELED ltsp-client - |- Linux Terminal Server |Linux Terminal Server |Project client programs |Project client programs ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2008-01-13 11:29 EST ------- This package is being thrown out, a new package is being made based upon upstream. Keeping this on the tracker only because it contains many notes that might be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:35:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131635.m0DGZDx5031110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: sqlite Alias: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 rnorwood at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From rnorwood at redhat.com 2008-01-13 11:35 EST ------- Yes, you're right, of course - I fail at following the process. :-) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:40:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131640.m0DGeJTq016999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 11:40 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't think we'll ship any patched gtk versions in parallel to gtk2. Well, I don't think either so I cc-ed to gtk2 maintainers. Feng, how do you think? IMO if you want to add some functions to GTK you should ask GTK upstream directly to import your patch sets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 16:43:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 11:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 405161] Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131643.m0DGhXYT017128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405161 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 11:43 EST ------- I will close this bug if no response from the reporter is received by 2008-01-25. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426728] Review Request: glpi-data-injection - Plugin for importing data into GLPI In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131713.m0DHDD4Z003633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glpi-data-injection - Plugin for importing data into GLPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426728 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at famillecollet.com 2008-01-13 12:13 EST ------- New version Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-data-injection.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/glpi-data-injection-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:32:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:32:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428576] Review Request: mkelfimage - Utility to create ELF boot images from Linux kernel images In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131732.m0DHWhOf005980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkelfimage - Utility to create ELF boot images from Linux kernel images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428576 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428576] New: Review Request: mkelfimage - Utility to create ELF boot images from Linux kernel images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428576 Summary: Review Request: mkelfimage - Utility to create ELF boot images from Linux kernel images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tibbs at math.uh.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/mkelfimage/mkelfimage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/rpms/mkelfimage/mkelfimage-2.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: mkelfImage is a program that makes a elf boot image for linux kernel images. The image should work with any i386 multiboot compliant boot loader, an ELF boot loader that passes no options, a loader compliant with the linuxBIOS elf booting spec or with the linux kexec kernel patch. A key feature here is that nothing relies upon BIOS calls, but they are made when necessary. This is useful for systems running linuxbios. I've worked with Warren to make this package for LTSP; I'll help it throuh review but he will end up being the primary maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131745.m0DHj3GA007707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 ------- Additional Comments From i at stingr.net 2008-01-13 12:45 EST ------- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=31178 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:48:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:48:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426830] Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131748.m0DHmtDB007917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Xerces - Perl API to Xerces XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426830 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-13 12:48 EST ------- Imported and built for devel and F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 17:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:48:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426643] Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131748.m0DHmN1B024972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Pid - Get the native PID and the PPID on Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426643 xavier at bachelot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-13 12:48 EST ------- Imported and built for devel and F-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:00:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131800.m0DI06f0026557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 13:00 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131801.m0DI1Xc0026847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-13 13:01 EST ------- I don't see why not -- it's part of the package name, and there's certainly precedent for it (e.g. perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel, -ParseExcel). Just referring to something using a trademarked name doesn't create infringement and we are talking about Excel here, not using it as a generic equivalent to "spreadsheet". ..and it's a heck of a lot shorter than Spreadsheet::WriteThatWhichMustNotBeNamed::Simple ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:07:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:07:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131807.m0DI73Lk010756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 13:07 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:11:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131811.m0DIBh1N028282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 13:11 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason to disallow cvsextras commits? That will make it harder for people to assist you or fix your package in the event you are not available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:14:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131814.m0DIEVYY028391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 13:14 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:16:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131816.m0DIGv21011966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 13:16 EST ------- Konstantin, any chance of an updated package to review soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:18:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:18:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 294001] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131818.m0DIIMsW029145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 13:18 EST ------- Martin, any chance of having some updated packages soon? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131819.m0DIJYIi012196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 13:19 EST ------- Richard, any chance you could update the package soon? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:41:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 294001] Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131841.m0DIfF9C015404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mumble - low-latency, high quality voice chat software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=294001 ------- Additional Comments From martin at gamesplace.info 2008-01-13 13:41 EST ------- I received the following mail: :::: Is there any chance you would like some assistance in building this setup? I currently am working on a spec file that fully installs the mumble server and client on fedora 8. This is a pulse audio setup with a working festival txt-to-speech implementation. Slicer mentioned that it would be a good idea if I work with you guys if you can use the help. I posted my builds in the forums for now just to get people going using it, but my end destination is to put out a virtual server build, qemu and vmware. I am a 15 year Unix Server Architect, with lots of experience scripting/admin/building things. I'd really like to get some input building murmur for redhat/fedora. Thanks David McKeon ::: As I am very busy currently, I told him that a review request is here and that it would be great if he could carry on with packaging mumble (may be that you have received that mail, also). I sadly do not know what the status on his side is, but I will compose a mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 18:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 405161] Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131856.m0DIujg8017573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405161 kdekorte at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(kdekorte at gmail.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From kdekorte at gmail.com 2008-01-13 13:56 EST ------- Close it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 19:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225614] Merge Review: bind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131920.m0DJKLBV021388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225614 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-13 14:20 EST ------- Adam, I'm CCing you because you're showing up as the package owner in pkgdb. Sorry if you're not really the owner of this package, but I'd really hate to make a bunch of review comments only to have them go to someone who has nothing to do with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 19:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428579] New: Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428579 Summary: Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Source repository and tarball release tool Currently supports only bzr, but more VCS tools are planned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 19:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801131944.m0DJiRvF008620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl 2008-01-13 14:44 EST ------- There isn't any particular reason to disallow cvsextras commits. This is just my first Fedora package, so I didn't know what the default value of that option is. Apparently you advise me to allow cvsextras commits. I don't have any problems with it being enabled, so here's a change request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: nntpgrab Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132001.m0DK1Ck0026744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 ------- Additional Comments From jeckersb at redhat.com 2008-01-13 15:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > It looks like this has been built for rawhide and F8. Did you intend to build > for F7 as well? I just went ahead and build it for F7 too. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=31361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:14:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132014.m0DKEerN028580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2008-01-13 15:14 EST ------- Yeah, sorry it took so long. Quite a number of changes in this release, so the spec has been modified heavily. http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux.spec http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/twitux-0.60-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:28:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428579] Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132028.m0DKSuja030369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428579 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-13 15:28 EST ------- The only nitpick I can find is that the first line of %description isn't grammatically a sentence. But honestly, there's nothing worth complaining about. * source files match upstream: 6ea7d6db3fd86b2dc3eaf6c00012ebf5fd0fe81963b10e51d3b45d9578aa1629 mkdst-0.1.tar.bz2 (downloaded manually since there is no permanent location yet) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64. * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mkdst = 0.1-1.fc9 = /bin/sh * %check is not present; no test suite upstream * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132049.m0DKn3iO017016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-13 15:49 EST ------- The kpathsea directory was still necessary because of dependencies. I have sort of fixed it by redoing the dependencies without the kpathsea directory, then rerunning configure to use the new depend.mk file and last removing the kpathsea directory. I also made a patch for xdg-open, could you please submit it upstream? Also I made other little fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132050.m0DKowwu017596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-13 15:50 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291514) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291514&action=view) add xdg-open to the browsers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 20:49:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132049.m0DKnvUr000398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-13 15:49 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291513) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291513&action=view) remove kpathsea directory + minor fcleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:12:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132112.m0DLCH63020603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-13 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) Thanks for looking it over, Patrice. > The kpathsea directory was still necessary because of dependencies. > I have sort of fixed it by redoing the dependencies without > the kpathsea directory, then rerunning configure to use the new > depend.mk file and last removing the kpathsea directory. > Ah, yes, well spotted, ingenious fix. Don't you love this crufty code :) > I also made a patch for xdg-open, could you please submit it > upstream? > Yeah - I'd just fixed that by replaing htmlview with xdg-open, but it's better to have both there, I agree. Once we've got it all sorted out I plan to send an email with all of the issues listed - I'll hold off for now to see if we find more. > Also I made other little fixes. ok, will check, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:09:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 366841] Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132109.m0DL9mAt003375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NoGravity - 3D 'Wing Commander'-like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366841 ------- Additional Comments From anpaza at mail.ru 2008-01-13 16:09 EST ------- Sorry if I haven't made it evident, the version nogravity-2.00-5.fc9.src.rpm works fine for me (two-head config). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:18:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428586] Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132118.m0DLIvLL004513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428586 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428586] New: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428586 Summary: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ldm.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ldm-0.1-0.20080113.fc8.src.rpm Description: LTSP Display Manager (exhausted... I will add a better description later) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:45:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132145.m0DLjXlm024815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-13 16:45 EST ------- I've given up permitting to use system kpathsea upstream. The dependencies are computed statically before the build including and it is too complicated to have it changed in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417711] Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132151.m0DLpY0D025459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: flam3 - Programs to generate and render cosmic recursive fractal flames https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417711 ianweller at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(ianweller at gmail.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From ianweller at gmail.com 2008-01-13 16:51 EST ------- pong. sorry, i've been distracted with school and whatnot. however, i'm still not understanding what exactly i need to do to get pkgconfig right. i've searched for docs everywhere, and google-fu'd to the best of my ability, and i still don't have anything new. in other words, help would be appreciated so i can this small problem fixed. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 21:51:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428361] Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132151.m0DLp9Ta008587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-sync-engine - Synce synchronization engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428361 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 22:18:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132218.m0DMI84h011938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at gmail.com 2008-01-13 17:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Yeah, sorry it took so long. Quite a number of changes in this release, so the > spec has been modified heavily. Couple of quick items: 1. the post & postun update-desktop-database scriptlets are unnecessary, since the desktopfile doesn't contain any Mimetype keys. 2. Missing BR for aspell-devel, iso-codes-devel, gnome-keyring-devel, & dbus-devel, which will enable spell-checking support, basic NM support, and gnome-keyring support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 22:23:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:23:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132223.m0DMN6Oc029370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-13 17:23 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Jan 13 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 22.84.13-3 - Added xdg-open patch (Patrice Dumas) - Avoid dependency generation implicating the bundled kpathsea files (Patrice Dumas) - Added Requires for Xaw3d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 22:24:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132224.m0DMOemt012611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-13 17:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I've given up permitting to use system kpathsea upstream. > The dependencies are computed statically before the build > including and it is too complicated to have it changed in my > opinion. Yes, I can quite understand that - I gave up too. I will however describe the issues we had to deal with to upstream in the hope that will provoke them to revisit their autotoolery. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 23:07:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:07:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428549] Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132307.m0DN7KlR002639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 ------- Additional Comments From roland at redhat.com 2008-01-13 18:07 EST ------- New SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/roland/tmp/trac-monotone-plugin-0.0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 23:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:06:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132306.m0DN65f6018257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From mricon at gmail.com 2008-01-13 18:06 EST ------- Many of these BRs were pulled in by others, but I did add iso-codes-devel (why?) and aspell-devel, which enabled spellchecking. Do we need to specifically require iso-codes, then? http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/twitux.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~icon/f/twitux-0.60-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 23:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 307791] Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132323.m0DNNiFC020090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: twitux - a Twitter client for the Gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307791 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 18:23 EST ------- You do need iso-codes-devel, otherwise configure reports: checking whether iso-codes exists and has iso-639 domain... no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 13 23:37:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801132337.m0DNbrNZ006366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From rainwoodman at gmail.com 2008-01-13 18:37 EST ------- Yes, you're right shipping two gtk in one distribution tends to confuse users. i thought the benefit is if we can install gtk2 by default, and if we leave gtk2-aqd in package list, then when people want mac-like menubar they can choose to install gtk2-aqd. anyway, thank you still. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 00:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140027.m0E0RCui012659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-01-13 19:27 EST ------- > [...] of the Mac-workaline global menu bar. [...] That should be "workalike." Sorry for the typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 00:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140025.m0E0Pj0Q012599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 peter at thecodergeek.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter at thecodergeek.com ------- Additional Comments From peter at thecodergeek.com 2008-01-13 19:25 EST ------- Personally, I'm a fan of the Mac-workaline global menu bar. However, I would also dislike shipping two different GTK+ versions with that as the only change since it would effectively double (or more) the work required to keep them updated and in sync with one another. My thinking is similar to that of the Freeworld FreeType build included in Livna/RPMfusion (http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1473). Could we add an ld.so config for the patched GTK+, then have it in its own %_libdir subdirectory or similar? Alternatively, and mostly for the sake of my own curiosity: GTK+ maintainers, would it possible to add this patch to the mainline gtk2 spec file, so we could easily rebuild it "--with global_menu" or similar (though it would be disabled by default)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 01:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140122.m0E1MjjM019908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-13 20:22 EST ------- I'm trying to request builds. Then, I got a question. Koji told me to need ".fedora-upload-ca.cert". But I don't have. The file is same ".fedora.cert"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 01:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140125.m0E1PfAs020501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-13 20:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #50) > Michael, > Any reason to CLOSE this as CANTFIX? You just need to come up with some good > name that will not contain -devel and simply rename Summary here and submit > package for review. 1. Can someone 'own' this bug? 2. Can you put a pointer to the package naming guidelines? Naming is out in the community, early leads are: Endoculator Documentation-Devil DocumentationDevel Although we have the ability to support 4711 packages, we have actually only compiled 2838 rpms with the devel package. We're going to need more time to get the show on the road. We should still be good for F9. We'll re-open this bug then. - Mike -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 01:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140143.m0E1hHL5005225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-13 20:43 EST ------- > 1. Can someone 'own' this bug? Someone will take the bug when they agree to review the package, that is the usual procedure. Anyway don't worry plenty of people are watching this bug now. :) > 2. Can you put a pointer to the package naming guidelines? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > Naming is out in the community Cool. You can continue using this bug for the review (that is normal procedure for submitted packages that get renamed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 01:51:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:51:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140151.m0E1p2tD023741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-13 20:51 EST ------- Perhaps you have not yet executed fedora-packager-setup.sh. The setup procedure for koji is written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 01:50:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226144] Merge Review: minicom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140150.m0E1oCDL006279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: minicom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226144 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tyler.l.owen at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-13 20:50 EST ------- I will review this package, please look for a full review in a bit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 423631] Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140208.m0E28nBq008834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sugar-evince - evince package for OLPC, library for embedding https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423631 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 21:08 EST ------- Closing bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:11:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140211.m0E2BTcd009356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 21:11 EST ------- Could you list the requirements for testing this on F8? I've only seen KDE4 packages for Rawhide so far, and when I tried installing kdebase from Rawhide it's pulling too many updates that I don't feel comfortable installing on my main machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427954] Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140211.m0E2BpOd009398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gtk2-aqd - Global Menu Patch for GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427954 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-13 21:11 EST ------- > My thinking is similar to that of the Freeworld FreeType build included in > Livna/RPMfusion (http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1473). Could we add > an ld.so config for the patched GTK+, then have it in its own %_libdir > subdirectory or similar? All kinds of odd hacks are possible, and I am not looking forward to the bugs that result from any such scenario. > Alternatively, and mostly for the sake of my own curiosity: GTK+ maintainers, > would it possible to add this patch to the mainline gtk2 spec file, so we > could > easily rebuild it "--with global_menu" or similar (though it would be > disabled by default)? I don't see any benefit of that, honestly. People who absolutely cannot live without this can just patch the srpm and rebuild. The difference between "add config option to spec file, rebuild" and "add patch to spec file, rebuild" is really marginal. For any further discussion of global menubar patches, please refer to the upstream bug on this patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140216.m0E2GtxA027088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-13 21:16 EST ------- Build-time: kdelibs4-devel Run-time: kdelibs4, kdebase-runtime (It may sort-of run without kdebase-runtime, but it'll definitely be missing icons and such, so installing kdebase-runtime is recommended.) These can be found in F8 updates (currently the old 3.96.2 version) or updates-testing (4.0.0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226144] Merge Review: minicom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140228.m0E2SBAJ011206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: minicom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226144 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-13 21:28 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 13933c8777839f00e3730df23599dc93 minicom-2.2.tar.gz 13933c8777839f00e3730df23599dc93 minicom-2.2.tar.gz1 OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. SRPM silent. See note 1. Not silent, but OK. Can be fixed with iconv OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should package latest version Notes: 1. Rpmlint output RPM: minicom.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/minicom-2.2/ChangeLog.old minicom.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/minicom-2.2/AUTHORS minicom.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/minicom-2.2/pl-translation.txt minicom.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/minicom-2.2/suomeksi minicom.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/minicom-2.2/portugues-brasil APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:51:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426650] Review Request: Linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140251.m0E2p1RW031566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Linux-igd - Daemon that emulates Microsoft's Internet Connection Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426650 masahase at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Summary|Review Request: linux-igd - |Review Request: Linux-igd - |Daemon that emulates |Daemon that emulates |Microsoft's Internet |Microsoft's Internet |Connection Service |Connection Service ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-13 21:51 EST ------- Oh, Right! All builds succeeded. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426738] Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140252.m0E2qdts014412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pards - A library for PARallel programs with Dataflow Synchronization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426738 masahase at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From masahase at gmail.com 2008-01-13 21:52 EST ------- All builds succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 02:58:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:58:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428549] Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140258.m0E2wLna015058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-01-13 21:58 EST ------- This is my first review attempt so I'm probably going to miss something but I'm trying to get some experience with the fedora procedures. ok MUST: rpmlint output trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/basic_io.py 0644 trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/automate.py 0644 trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/cache.py 0644 trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/backend.py 0644 trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/util.py 0644 trac-monotone-plugin.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site- packages/tracmtn/__init__.py 0644 Seems silly to patch these out, I would consider asking upstream to remove the shebangs since it doesn't look like these are inteded to be executed. ok MUST: name follows naming guidelines ok MUST: spec file matches package name ok MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ok MUST: license is acceptable ok MUST: license is correct ok MUST: license file included in doc ok MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. ok MUST: spec file is readable NO MUST: source matches upstream The instructions for retrieving the source from the upstream vcs does not specify a specific tag or revision. This makes it impossible to verify the source. ok MUST: package builds successfully NO MUST: BuildRequires is complete trac is required at build because it is imported (indirectly) from setup.py ok MUST: owns created directories ok MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. ok MUST: permssions are correct ok MUST: clean removes buildroot ok MUST: macros used consistently ok MUST: package contains code or permissable content ok MUST: package does not depend on %doc files ok MUST: doesn't own other package's files ok MUST: install preps buildroot ok MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: NO SHOULD: builds in mock See above regarding buildrequires ok SHOULD: package works properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140305.m0E358LB016481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-13 22:05 EST ------- rpmlint complains about library files that are not ldconfig-ed, though it does not seem to affect the package's running. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/okteta-0.0.1-0.1.20080102svn755662.fc8.x86_64.rpm okteta.x86_64: W: no-documentation okteta.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/liboktetacore_b.so.4.0.0 okteta.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/liboktetacore_b.so.4.0.0 okteta.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/liboktetagui_b.so.4.0.0 okteta.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/liboktetagui_b.so.4.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:12:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:12:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140312.m0E3CGDi017255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-13 22:12 EST ------- Oops, good catch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:16:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140316.m0E3G3vC002504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-01-13 22:16 EST ------- > - Even though the post/postun scriptlets does not fail if update-mime-database > is missing, I don't see any reason not to add a dependency for them to ensure > that installation works as intended. The section in ScriptletSnippets regarding mimeinfo specifically instruct to not add a requires for shared-mime-info because when shared-mime-info is installed it will update the mime database itself. I've also got another update that I hope addresses the concern about the SRPM including the upstream binary release. I included further information about what I am using from the binary distribution and modified %prep to only extract those files from the archive. http://programmer-monk.net/fedora/packages/scala/scala-2.6.1-6.src.rpm * Sun Jan 13 2008 Geoff Reedy - 2.6.1-6 - Include further information about inclusion of binary distribution - Unpack only those files needed from the binary distribution - Include note about license approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140328.m0E3S6IU003820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:27:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140327.m0E3RfNa003776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 03:46:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140346.m0E3knIQ021263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-13 22:46 EST ------- Note that it would be nice to test this with package_kpart set back to 1 as this will probably be how it'll end up when actually imported (see comment #1). (I can respin a new SRPM if needed.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140403.m0E43Yhj023736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 23:03 EST ------- 1)missing BR: pygtk2-devel and remove pygtk2 from BR. 2)drop static package. Any reason you packaged it? 3) rpmlint output is mypaint.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mypaint-0.5.0/html/prev-template.xcf.gz The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> I think ok to accepet here. mypaint.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/mypaint-0.5.0/html/generate.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. ==> Can you drop executable permissions here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:01:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428603] New: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428603 Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gc at falconpl.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.7/falcon.spec SRPM URL: http://www.falconpl.org/downloads/0.8.7/Falcon-0.8.7-1.src.rpm Description: Falcon aims to be the next generation scripting language, providing a wide set of programming paradigms, template file processing for web development and document based applications, radical internationalization and application extension support. The package includes the main Falcon core system and the "feather" modules, that are the main modules considered part of the language, as the reflexive compiler, the regex module, the zlib binding and others. Although we've been releasing RPMs for some version now, this is the first try at an official SRPM; please, lend us a hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:13:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140413.m0E4D81a009677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 23:13 EST ------- Yeah, I guess this is "Nominative fair use" from what I can see, so should be fine. Sorry for the sidetracking... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:18:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140418.m0E4Ig4s010291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-13 23:18 EST ------- Yeah, I think having cvsextras commits yes is the way to go... I have changed this package. Thanks for your understanding. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140422.m0E4M6Iq026083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 04:56:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:56:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140456.m0E4uKKw014671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-13 23:56 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. 8fffeb9fa14e2d86a4ad539b392496d3 dragonplayer-2.0_beta1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text COPYING is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + scriptlets are used. + GUI app. SHOULD: remove mkdir %{buildroot} from %install. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 07:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140733.m0E7XECb005373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-14 02:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > > 1. Can someone 'own' this bug? > > Someone will take the bug when they agree to review the package, > that is the usual procedure. Anyway don't worry plenty of people > are watching this bug now. :) > 10-4 > > 2. Can you put a pointer to the package naming guidelines? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines > You need to document the implications of the reserve word "-devel" so others do not make the same mistake I did. This law is not written above. I will stand in the law so that those with the power and privilege can protect me. > > Naming is out in the community > > Cool. > > You can continue using this bug for the review (that is > normal procedure for submitted packages that get renamed). > Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 07:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140737.m0E7bqeI020137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From ariszlo at gmail.com 2008-01-14 02:37 EST ------- Release 0.7 no longer overwrites /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu at the expense of requiring more user interaction: http://gtk-apps.org/content/show.php?content=73513 In this release, each user may individually modify the menu by clicking on System/Preferences/Add KDE Menu, which pops up a terminal and, if the user agrees, it copies /usr/share/gnome-menu-extended/replace-fedora.menu into ~/.config/menus/applications.menu (after backing up user's Alacarte-modified menu if there is any). It also replaces "Add KDE Menu" with "Restore Applications Menu" in System/Preferences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 07:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140753.m0E7rwqT007969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 ------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za 2008-01-14 02:53 EST ------- No he didn't say that I can take over maintainership, the following is what he did say and why I opened bug 315021. The delay in that bug was why I tried my hand at fixing the .spec file for the new release and once that was done the further delay was why I opened this. I was hoping that the .spec would make it easier for Roozbeh to quickly upgrade, I'd prefer that to still be the case as I don't think I have time or experience to be the maintainer: ----------------- Hi Dwayne, I am currently in a very busy transition period, moving from Tehran to San Jose, California. That's been the reason things have been going very slow on my Fedora front. Still, to make sure I don't forget to update the package in Fedora, feel free to open a bug for updating translate-toolkit at http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Make sure it's assigned to me. Cheers, Roozbeh ------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:25:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140825.m0E8PvKs026615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-14 03:25 EST ------- Joel Andres Granados: Fedora Name: joelGranados Fedora Account : jgranado Martin Sivak: Fedora Name: martinSivak Fedora Account: msivak Guess you are refering to what fedora system calls account (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoelGranados). right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140835.m0E8ZcSZ013864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-14 03:35 EST ------- >The section in ScriptletSnippets regarding mimeinfo specifically instruct to not >add a requires [snip] Indeed. At least I learn a lot in this bug... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140837.m0E8b2hP028083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-14 03:37 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-html Short Description: html manual for Tcl/Tk Owners: mmaslano Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:43:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:43:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226082] Merge Review: libXp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140843.m0E8ha0d029038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226082 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:42:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140842.m0E8gcwc014835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From nphilipp at redhat.com 2008-01-14 03:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > Is it the plan to replace vixie cron with this by default in Fedora 9? If so, > following the feature process would be appropriate > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy As we already had this forked version (albeit under the old name vixie-cron) in F-8, this is merely a re-packaged version of that with the most user-visible change being the change of the package name. I don't think that counts as a new feature (but I may be wrong). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 08:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226081] Merge Review: libXpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140843.m0E8hPJ3014947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226081 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 413321] Review Request: inotail - An inotify-enabled tail replacement In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140901.m0E911kf032425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: inotail - An inotify-enabled tail replacement Alias: inotail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413321 moritz at barsnick.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moritz at barsnick.net ------- Additional Comments From moritz at barsnick.net 2008-01-14 04:01 EST ------- Can I re-open or append for improval? (If not, I'll file a new ticket.) The SPEC file has such a line in the %install section: chmod 0755 %{buildroot}/usr/bin/inotail a) Permissions can (or should?) be forced in the %files section using %attr. b) %{buildroot}/usr/bin must comply with the %files's %{_bindir}. One of the two is wrong. Assuming this tool has a very hand-crafted Makefile, and it is built using "prefix=%{buildroot}/usr", "/usr/bin" may (or may not) be the correct choice. Thanks for the tool, by the way. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140906.m0E96WEV019719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428581 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140933.m0E9XB7G005988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 04:33 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291577) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291577&action=view) spec file patch fix japanese and minor cleanups Use bcond for japanese, and fix it. fix license. Use update-desktop-database scriptlets everywhere from the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140935.m0E9Z7gZ006483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Use bcond for japanese, and fix it. > fix license. > Use update-desktop-database scriptlets everywhere from the > guidelines. Also removed the unneeded Requires that are brought in automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:41:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:41:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140941.m0E9fppc025675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-14 04:41 EST ------- I have left prev-template.xcf.gz since it is gzip'ed. Here is the updated package. http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint-0.5.0-2.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 09:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801140940.m0E9e0Bw025109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 04:39 EST ------- rpmlint still says: xdvik.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xdvi xdvik.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xdvi xdvik.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 43, tab: line 5) Regarding the unversionned obsolete and requires I don't know if it is right or not, given that the package name may change in the future and become xdvi. Unless somebody else disagrees, and with the patch applied, this is APPROVED I'd like to be comaintainer. Jindrich, don't you want too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:14:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141014.m0EAEZnY013988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:49:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141049.m0EAncnN019988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-01-14 05:49 EST ------- I finally took the time to release the devel branch. Sorry about that, I was really planning on reviving that package... but if someone else can do it *now*, then that's even better :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:57:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:57:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141057.m0EAvCRr021453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-14 05:57 EST ------- It's ready now yes I can upload it now and release it for Fedora 8 and devel though it's up to you whether you want to do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:59:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428642] Review Request: remctl - GSSAPI secured remote command execution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141059.m0EAxLWe021585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: remctl - GSSAPI secured remote command execution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428642 simon at sxw.org.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 405161] Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141056.m0EAuZ8o021387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - X virtual Keyboard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=405161 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 05:56 EST ------- Okay. Once closing. Thank you anyway! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 10:58:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428642] New: Review Request: remctl - GSSAPI secured remote command execution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428642 Summary: Review Request: remctl - GSSAPI secured remote command execution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: simon at sxw.org.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/sxw/remctl.spec SRPM URL: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/sxw/remctl-2.11-1.src.rpm Description: remctl (the client) and remctld (the server) implement a client/server protocol for running single commands on a remote host using Kerberos v5 authentication and returning the output. They use a very simple GSS-API-authenticated network protocol, combined with server-side ACL support and a server configuration file that maps remctl commands to programs that should be run when that command is called by an authorised user. This is my first package, and I'm in need of a sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141111.m0EBBF7e010038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge reviews to be completed for F9 Alias: F9MergeReviewTarget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226143, which changed state. Bug 226143 Summary: Merge Review: mingetty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226143 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226143] Merge Review: mingetty In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141111.m0EBBEKG010013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mingetty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226143 limb at jcomserv.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | ------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2008-01-14 06:11 EST ------- Indeed. I've just now finished the rest of the review, and there's another change to be made. The Source tag must include a URL, a la: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Fix that and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:26:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141126.m0EBQuAC012201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:26:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141126.m0EBQUwI012140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-01-14 06:26 EST ------- > SHOULD: > remove mkdir %{buildroot} from %install. Just to understand this: This should be removed because the directory is also created by "make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}"? > APPROVED. Thx. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dragonplayer Short Description: A simple video player for KDE 4 Owners: svahl,rdieter,kkofler,ltinkl,than Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141157.m0EBvUK7016678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 06:57 EST ------- oops I mean BR: python and Requires: python-libgmail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:56:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 422841] Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141156.m0EBuVQ0030584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-libgmail-docs - Documents and examples for python-libgmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=422841 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 06:56 EST ------- build.log showed /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found you still have missing BR: python python-libgmail also, drop executable bits from README and COPYING. I think its ok to have other rpmlint output as here we want those .py examples to be installed as executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141156.m0EBuTFr030546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-01-14 06:56 EST ------- Thanks for these comments! I had never packaged a ruby application for Fedora before, and completely missed the ruby specific packaging Wiki page. I'll fix this ASAP. About the package name, I'm actually all for "gnome-applet-sshmenu", but the thing is that this program doesn't necessarily require a GNOME panel to run, as it includes both a simple program, and the gnome applet. Maybe it would be possible to split it into "sshmenu" which would be the simple non-applet application (still possibly requiring some ruby-gnome stuff), and "gnome-applet-sshmenu" which would require "sshmenu" but also provide the panel/bonobo/etc. stuff which is GNOME applet specific. Further thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 11:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 06:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141159.m0EBxlaN016865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 06:59 EST ------- Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-addins.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-addins-1.2.6-3.fc9.src.rpm Fixed all but MERGH?: I've found that with some mono packages, exporting the --prefix/libdir stuff solves more problems than fixing the makefiles, so I do it now just as a belt and braces sort of thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:03:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426149] Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141203.m0EC3BaN031867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sshmenu - GNOME panel applet to organize SSH connection information in a menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426149 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2008-01-14 07:03 EST ------- I've updated the package to 3.15-2. http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/sshmenu/ * Mon Jan 14 2008 Matthias Saou 3.15-2 - Follow ruby guidelines : Put ruby files in ruby_sitelib. - Add required hardcoded ruby abi version requirement. I'll wait for further comments regarding the name change and/or applet split. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210007] Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141206.m0EC6Wsq018705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From nadia.derbey at bull.net 2008-01-14 07:06 EST ------- fixed both issues New links: SPEC URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/specfiles/FE/FE-14-4/libtune.spec SRPM URL: http://libtune.sourceforge.net/srpms/FE/libtune-0.14-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141203.m0EC3sbw017983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 07:03 EST ------- Fixed Spec URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf.spec SRPM URL: http://pfj.fedorapeople.org/mono-zeroconf-0.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 372161] Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141202.m0EC2qX8017864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-themes-extras - extra themes for gnome https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372161 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-14 07:02 EST ------- Thanks heaps for all the help it's been uploaded and release for F-8 stable since it's a 'new' package. Marking this as next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141205.m0EC5gKQ018603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 07:05 EST ------- 1)drop .la using find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' in %install 2) I think I have not seen such case which installs libraries in python packages. /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint/mydrawwidget.so /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint/mydrawwidget.so.0 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint/mydrawwidget.so.0.0.0 But I can see that .so is generated using .c code so as per review guideline MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428115] Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141206.m0EC6KH0032700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Search - Virtual base class for WWW searches https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428115 ------- Additional Comments From xavier at bachelot.org 2008-01-14 07:06 EST ------- Yes, the license is definitely not GPL+ or Artistic. The main license from the README file : Copyright (c) 1996 University of Southern California. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are duplicated in all such forms and that any documentation, advertising materials, and other materials related to such distribution and use acknowledge that the software was developed by the University of Southern California, Information Sciences Institute. The name of the University may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. The other copyright notice from lib/WWW/Search/{Simple,Null}.pm : Copyright (c) 1997,98 by the United Nations Administrative Committee on Coordination (ACC) All rights reserved. Spot, what do you think ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:17:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141217.m0ECHMHt020234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-14 07:17 EST ------- http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint-0.5.0-3.fc8.src.rpm http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/mypaint/mypaint.spec I saw that but I thought for one file it was pointless but oh well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141225.m0ECPVL6003054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(karsten at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2008-01-14 07:25 EST ------- diff -r1.27 libcap.spec 3c3 < Release: 30 --- > Release: 31 65c65 < cp %{SOURCE1} doc/ --- > cp -p %{SOURCE1} doc/ 76c76 < %doc doc/capability.notes doc/capfaq-0.2.txt --- > %doc doc/capability.notes doc/capfaq-0.2.txt License -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:30:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426026] Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141230.m0ECUlkv003938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-menu-extended - Gnome Menu with KDE directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426026 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 07:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) Well, this seems to be accepted. I want to try 0.7 to check it in detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428559] Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141236.m0ECa0VD023067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mypaint - A simple and easy paint program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428559 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 07:35 EST ------- mypaint-devel.i386: W: no-dependency-on mypaint mypaint-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized mypaint devel files Summary doesn't begin with a capital letter. I am still not sure about these install locations /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint/mydrawwidget.so.0 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mypaint/mydrawwidget.so.0.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 12:51:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226228] Merge Review: pam In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141251.m0ECpUWL025383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226228 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2008-01-14 07:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. I see that upstream is named Linux-PAM. Perhaps consider re-naming it? I don't think it's worth the hassle - on the administrative side and on the users' confusion side as well. > 2. Might add a comment about why this package needs it's own private copy > of the db package. OK, I've extended the comment on line 76. > 3. shouldn't the license of pam_tty_audit.c be GPLv2 per RedHat guidelines? No, this module will be upstreamed in the next upstream release, so it should keep the preferred upstream licence. > 4. Can some of the tests and such be moved from the install section to a %test > section? > like the dlopen tests and so forth. What is the %test section good for? I cannot find any mention of %test anywhere. I'd prefer to have these simple tests run as part of the build/install process, they are pretty simple and fast. > 5. Might ask upstream to include a copy of the GPL COPYING file too. Will do. > 6. Why strip the binaries? > # Forcibly strip binaries. > strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/* ||: > > debuginfo should pull that out. That is a workaround hack for an old problem with rpmbuild where it didn't strip setuid binaries. Removed. > 7. Might note that we can depreciate the pre/post hacks for USEMD5 after a while. They are not too useful anymore and even can break things. Removed. > 8. No need to require 'coreutils'. Why not? I need 'install' in %post > 9. 15 open bugs > You might look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218063 WONTFIXed - current rpm shouldn't complain anymore > and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428444 in particular. NOTABUG - there is already BuildRequires: libtool > 10. rpmlint says: > > pam.src:212: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR > > You should be able to remove the following lines from prep: > cp %{SOURCE5} . > cp %{SOURCE6} . > cp %{SOURCE7} . > > Just refer to the sources directly when installing. Both changes done. > Ignore: > > pam.src:246: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/security > pam.src:327: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security > pam.src: W: strange-permission dlopen.sh 0755 > pam.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/pam_timestamp_check root 04755 > pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/pam_timestamp_check 04755 > pam.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/security/namespace.init > pam.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/unix_update 0700 > pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/unix_update 0700 > pam.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/unix_chkpwd root 04755 > pam.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/unix_chkpwd 04755 > pam.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/security/opasswd 0600 > pam.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/faillog > pam.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.perms > pam.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/security/console.perms.d/50-default.perms > pam.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > pam.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/security/opasswd > > Fix if you like: > > pam.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 130, tab: line 137) > > 11. Might add a %{?_smp_mflags} to make? Unfortunately pam doesn't build with it yet. I'll fix the Makefiles in future and add this then. Fixes are in pam-0.99.8.1-15.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 13:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 374611] Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141315.m0EDFd89030576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_mysql - PAM module for auth UNIX users using MySQL data base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374611 wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-14 08:15 EST ------- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: all arch supported by koji scratch build [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: none Binary RPM: pam_mysql.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pam_mysql-0.7/CREDITS pam_mysql.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7-0.1.rc1.1 1:0.7-0.3.rc1.fc9 [see issue 1] [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [see also issue 2] [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: a139c4b4bf1a2e591a016069405428eb862f7690 pam_mysql-0.7RC1.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [see also issue 2] [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [x] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. There is a .so file, but it is NOT used for devel [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English la nguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64, Centos 5/i386, Centos 4/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: all archs supported by koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English la nguages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on:devel/x86_64, Centos 5/i386, Centos 4/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: all archs supported by koji scratch build [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1.rpmlint gives - pam_mysql.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pam_mysql-0.7/CREDITS Using iconv would fix that - pam_mysql.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7-0.1.rc1.1 1:0.7-0.3.rc1.fc9 The last one is triggered by the presence of a changelog entry inserted by rel-eng. Please correct the newest changelog entry (it is not in sync with the release tag anyway) before commit. 2. Although technically the value you have chosen for BuildRoot is correct, please consider replacing it with one of the variants listed at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef08363613 19ab962473 3. There is a Duplicate BuildRequires: openssl-devel (by mysql-devel), zlib-devel (by openssl-devel). Current fedora style packaging calls for removing the duplicates but I see it as a minor problem. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ If you do not mind, please ask for EPEL branches and add me as co-maintainer for them (or for the whole package, whatever you seem fit). I am using it on several servers, so I am directly interested in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141414.m0EEELn0009887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 09:14 EST ------- OK, thanks Patrice, I'll integrate your patch later when I am home. I didn't know about bcond, that's very useful. I'll add Patrice and Jindrich as co-maintainers, unless Jindrich tells me not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:31:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226538] Merge Review: wget In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141431.m0EEVXcC012798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: wget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226538 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2008-01-14 09:31 EST ------- closing now as review is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:39:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427530] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141439.m0EEdKIs028461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427530 rhbugs at n-dimensional.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |427529 ------- Additional Comments From rhbugs at n-dimensional.de 2008-01-14 09:39 EST ------- awesome 2.1 will probably be released before this review request has been approved. awesome 2.1 depends on libconfuse >= 2.6 which is not in Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141439.m0EEd4i8028412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 09:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > No he didn't say that I can take over maintainership, > I'd prefer that to still be the case as I > don't think I have time or experience to be the maintainer: Well, I have to understand the current situation correctly. - Do you want to co-maintain translate-toolkit with Roozbeh? (and is Roozbeh willing to accept it? If unsuer, would you contact him/her?) - Or you don't want to even co-maintain translate-toolkit with Roozbah? Note: Currently translate-toolkit is open to cvsextras members, which means that every person who maintains at least one package on Fedora (including me) can make changes on translate-toolkit . So if you want I can update translate-toolkit to the latest version. However I don't want to do so because I don't know what translate-toolkit is at all and so I don't know how to check if the latest version works well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141443.m0EEhs7w014535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 09:43 EST ------- Thou CVS request lacks the proper magic incantations oh mighty one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 14:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:59:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428603] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141459.m0EEx1Ww032030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428603 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: Falcon - The|Review Request: Falcon - The |Falcon Programming Language |Falcon Programming Language Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-14 09:59 EST ------- Will do full review in a bit, but here's the result of running rpmlint on the package, as well as suggested changes. Falcon.src: E: invalid-spec-name falcon.spec -- should be Falcon.spec Falcon.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/Falcon-0.8.7-1.src.rpm.31479/falcon.spec -- just re-save the spec file with UTF8 character encoding Falcon.src:31: W: hardcoded-prefix-tag %{prefix} Falcon.src:37: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Giancarlo Falcon.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name} -- Please remove these. Also, release number should be followed by %{?dist} so that when your package is built on the build server, it is tagged with the distribution name (.f8, .f9, etc) Falcon.src:40: W: hardcoded-path-in-buildroot-tag /tmp/%{name}-%{version} -- see this document: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 Falcon.src:64: W: setup-not-quiet -- add -q to %setup Falcon.src:65: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -- rm -rf should only be in %install and %clean Falcon.src:72: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build ./build.sh -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr -f /usr -- use %{_prefix} instead of /usr . I guess $RPM_BUILD_ROOT can't be avoided here because of the way build.sh is written Falcon.src:118: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib -- in %files, use %{_bindir}, %{_includedir}, %{_datadir} and %{_libdir} Falcon.src: E: no-changelogname-tag -- add a %changelog section at bottom with entries in this format: * Mon Jan 14 2008 Giancarlo Niccolai -- 0.8.7-1 - Initial Fedora package Falcon.src: W: invalid-license Falcon License -- Might have to clear this on the fedora-legal mailing list; it is not a pre-approved license. How different is it from the Apache 2.0 license? See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 15:06:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 245720] Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141506.m0EF6Brp001663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: prcsys - Parallel rc with LSB dependency resolver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245720 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2008-01-14 10:06 EST ------- closing as review and CVS stuff is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 15:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:12:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141512.m0EFCJRI002510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 10:12 EST ------- The thing is.. we already export those as part of the rpm build system, that shouldn't be needed. If it makes a difference then I think it's a bug with our build magic not your spec and should be handled as such. BAD: mono-addins.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 3) However it now builds in mock and I have no further complains, fix that tabs spaces thing before checking it though. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 15:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428603] Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141521.m0EFLLYm004049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Falcon - The Falcon Programming Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428603 ------- Additional Comments From gc at falconpl.org 2008-01-14 10:21 EST ------- Thank you very much. Just to give you a short insight; the rationale of the license is here. http://www.falconpl.org/?page_id=license_comment It differs from Apache in the sense that it is tailored on a "compiler" instead than on a "server". The idea is that to grant freedom of usage in any application while still protecting the openness of true derivative works, as i.e. revisions of the language itself. We are willing (actually glad) to submit the license to any certification authority; we have also started OSI process (I am getting a legal compliance analisys). We'll post it to the suggested list; thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 15:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141541.m0EFfB20007083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 mnagy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(mnagy at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com 2008-01-14 10:41 EST ------- Updated in CVS. rpmlint now gives me: iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping6 root 04755 iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping6 04755 iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping root 04755 iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping 04755 - these are okay, we need root privileges iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath /bin/tracepath iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/ping6 /bin/ping6 iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/arping /sbin/arping iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath6 /bin/tracepath6 - won't fix, because if i would change these to relative it would be dangerous iputils.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name rdisc - this is alright (this package is a collection of utilities, which rdisc is part of) I also changed the character encoding for RELNOTES to utf8, and few symlinks. I was also talking to Martin Bacovsky (previous maintainer) and he said that he did query upstream for license files, but didn't receive no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 16:06:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:06:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] New: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jamatos at fc.up.pt QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/tex-simplecv.spec SRPM URL: http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/tex-simplecv-1.6-1.src.rpm Description: The simplecv document class is intended to provide a simple yet elegant way to write your curriculum vitae (resume). This is a repackaging of the |cv| class that has been available with LyX for a long time. The change of name has been made necessary by the existence of another |cv| class on CTAN. This package is needed since lyx no longer carries this package and users of previous versions of lyx may use documents that require it (bug #428526). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 16:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141611.m0EGBOP1012880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 mmaslano at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-14 11:11 EST ------- [18] Fork is already in rawhide, but now is renaming of package needed. I have to also in this case go through Features/Policy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 16:15:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141615.m0EGFZ1x031187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-01-14 11:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) ... some questions and points. I look forward to finally being able to see this toolchain, and I'm sure many of us will review it for use or replacement of existing parts of the Fedora Docs tools/infrastructure. Major kudos to Jeff, whose work I've long admired and benefited from. This package arrives at a good time for tech review as we revamp parts of documentation production with the help of Fedora Infrastructure. My comments here have the caveat that I have not done a full feature review of the toolchain, so I am plainly curious what it provides that is missing in the existing toolchain and infrastructure. Especially, what is provided that the community has been asking for. If we can answer these questions here, we can save others from having to do the deep research themselves. :) > It is a mature project with a significant existing community of users, who have > it embedded in their enterprise infrastructure. Is this community entirely internal to Red Hat? That may explain why no one had access to the Fedora collective consciousness about *-devel for namespaces, which is one of those things no one wrote down because, "Everyone knows it." :) > The package brings together an end-to-end opensource toolchain that > allows open source projects to produce professional documentation, > taking several forms of input and outputting html, pdf, manpages, > xml, and several other formats. > > It produces branded documentation using templates. > > It handles multiple language translations. > > It's been developed over a number of years and is used in an enterprise setting. > > Basically it provides the whole kit and caboodle for professional open source > documentation production from source. Sounds like the existing Fedora Docs Project toolchain. It does all those things. One difference, it was developed by volunteer contributors working from the Fedora community, so I reckon it hasn't nearly the same amount of features. For example, I'm sure it outputs better PDFs since I know Jeff has done a lot of work at making passivetex and FOP spin and hum. > In terms of Fedora it provides a missing > infrastructure piece for documentation production and translations. > > In terms of the wider scene it provides a missing infrastructure > piece, Confused here -- we've an existing toolchain that does all this, all built and hosted within Fedora over many years. What is missing? Fedora Infrastructure hasn't come forward yet and said they are missing any of these functions. Nor has anyone else from the Fedora community, with the exception of prettier/unbroken PDFs. > think that a canonical name is not out of place. Red Hat / Fedora have a history > of providing significant plumbing pieces to the community (like NetworkManager). The exception is, those pieces were developed initially in the open, which is one way to avoid unfortunate namespace problems. Ironically, we often point to NetworkManager as a lost marketing opportunity, since common credit for "first use" went to other distributions. If this doc toolchain package is going to so significantly change the landscape for free documentation, we have missed the chance to publicize its development. Let's not miss any further opportunities. Finally, big +1 to the idea of a content development spin. Huzzah! Let us know on fedora-docs-list if you want any community contributors and testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 16:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141620.m0EGKF1b014227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-01-14 11:20 EST ------- Not a problem with comaintenance. Thanks Jonathan for packaging xdvi separately! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 16:59:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141659.m0EGxI6q005583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 kvolny at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427484] Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141700.m0EH0Yx5020400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-RedHat - Red Hat theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427484 ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-01-14 12:00 EST ------- I didn't run rpmlint to see if it dinged the license, but the license in the spec file (OPL + restrictions) is not allowed in Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing For what reason are you using the optional restrictions? All the Red Hat branding is already protected by trademark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427483] Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141710.m0EHARVf007967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483 kwade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-01-14 12:10 EST ------- The license used is the "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike". There are some troublesome aspects to this license. * This particular license is marked as "bad" on this page; the no-commercial clause is a restriction of freedoms: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing * The CC provides no warranty protection, which is why Red Hat Legal has blocked Fedora from using it for formal content that is about specific products; we can use the CC for "generic computer education" Why are you using the NC clause? The JBoss logos are strongly protected by trademark already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:12:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141712.m0EHCbBs008096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 12:12 EST ------- I think it's safe to say John has vanished. Dave, do you want to take this over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141734.m0EHYEjP011075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: tcl-html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 12:34 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:38:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141738.m0EHcnw1011897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 12:38 EST ------- yes, we need the fedora account names for adding a package to the package database, not wiki names or the like. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141741.m0EHfdRn012533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 12:41 EST ------- cvs done. Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141739.m0EHdh4h026593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 12:39 EST ------- indeed. Please use a cvs request template from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure Otherwise we have no idea what branches, etc you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:44:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141744.m0EHiBdj012778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 12:44 EST ------- For 2.6.1-6: A. General packaging issues on spec file. A-1: Description stage: * Disttag - Please consider to use %?_dist tag. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag ? Some questions for Requires - For vim-scala, is it sufficient to require only vim-common? - For XXX-scala subpackages (like emacs-scala), don' they need scala package? A-2: %prep, %build, %install stage * Timestamps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, please add "-p" option to keep timestamps. A-3: %files * Directory ownership issue - There are many directories which are not owned by any packages. -------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/scala/lib/scala-compiler.jar scala-2.6.1-6 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/scala/lib/ file /usr/share/scala/lib is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing scala related packages are correctly owned by scala related packages. Note: When you write -------------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{_datadir}/scala/lib/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- This contains the directory %_datadir/scala/lib itself and all files/directories/etc under %_datadir/scala/lib. * gtksourceview2-scala - For what purpose does this subpackage exist? This subpackage contains no files. B. rpmlint -------------------------------------------------------------------- emacs-scala-el.noarch: W: no-documentation enscript-scala.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/enscript-scala-2.6.1/README gtksourceview2-scala.noarch: W: no-documentation scala.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/scala/lib/scala-compiler.jar /usr/share/java/scala/scala-compiler.jar scala.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/scala/lib/scala-partest.jar /usr/share/java/scala/scala-partest.jar scala.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/scala/lib/scala-dbc.jar /usr/share/java/scala/scala-dbc.jar scala.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/scala/lib/scala-library.jar /usr/share/java/scala/scala-library.jar scala.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/scala/scala-partest-2.6.1.jar scala.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/scala/scala-dbc-2.6.1.jar scala.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/scala/scala-compiler-2.6.1.jar scala-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation scala-devel.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ant.d/scala scala-examples.noarch: W: no-documentation -------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: * wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/enscript-scala-2.6.1/README contains Window-type end-of-line encoding. Please fix this by "sed -i 's|\r||'" or dos2unix. * symlink-should-be-relative Due to chroot issue and so, we request all symlinks should be relative, not absolute. * class-path-in-manifest --------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpmlint -I class-path-in-manifest class-path-in-manifest : The META-INF/MANIFEST file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path. These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work, they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, I am not familiar with Java and I am not sure if you should fix this warning.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 17:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:49:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141749.m0EHnEhI027940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-14 12:49 EST ------- The package seems to have been built sucessfully and pushed (at least in rawhide). Any reason to not close this bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428492] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141814.m0EIE7K1017698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-14 13:14 EST ------- Imported and building... Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:14:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141814.m0EIE8HZ017726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 Bug 428493 depends on bug 428492, which changed state. Bug 428492 Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-WriteExcel-Simple - Simple single-sheet Excel document creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428492 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141821.m0EILuJs019565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com |david at lovesunix.net ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 13:21 EST ------- GOOD: Builds in mock (fedora-development-x86_64) Spec is in readable US English, and sexy sed magic Cleans up after itself Owns all the good stuff BAD: mono-tools.src: W: strange-permission mono-tools.patch 0600 File permissions should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) Should excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - remember to add a note please (I suspect I forgot this in the previous mono reviews - please apply liberally to mono specs) mergh?: I'm still not liking that whole defining the libdir thing, it seems like a build system bug which we are hiding but in this case it's even uglier than before. Please consider removing the define and just invoking %{_libdir} as an argument to configure. You might also want to expand the description a bit so it makes more sense for users such as which tools this package provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:29:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141829.m0EIT2qq002476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:29 EST ------- Would you take a CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:28:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141828.m0EIScFt002411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:28 EST ------- Closing as now kitsune is rebuilt on devel/F-8/F-7 and requests for F-8/F-7 are done on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141833.m0EIXdLg003409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 13:33 EST ------- I'll fix the W before import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:32:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427373] Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141832.m0EIWuXD021381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dbxml-perl - Perl bindings for Oracle DB XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427373 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:32 EST ------- Closing for now. Please adjust EVR between branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:32:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141832.m0EIWpoF021346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 13:32 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-zeroconf Short Description: Mono.Zeroconf is a cross platform Zero Configuration Networking library for Mono and .NET Owners: pfj Branches: f8, fc7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits:yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427034] Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141835.m0EIZ7of003912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NNTPGrab - Usenet download program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427034 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:35 EST ------- Closing as rebuilds are done on all branches and requests for F-8/7 are already done on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141839.m0EIdXMl022542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 13:39 EST ------- oh and excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - forgot that one before because I don't have ppc hardware but if you don't do that koji will give you the seal of epic fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141845.m0EIjdrs023949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-14 13:45 EST ------- Also before you build this remember to excludearch ppc64.. my bad entirely for forgetting that during the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141845.m0EIj718023792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 13:45 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-addins Short Description: mono-addins is required for monodevelop and is currently expected to take over infrastructure aspects of mono Owners: pfj Branches: f8, f7 InitialCC: pfj Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:48:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141848.m0EIm1mj024114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:48 EST ------- It may be that I will check this package later. But before that would you fix release number and Requires(post,postun)? - If this is release candidate (i.e. pre-release), the rpm release number "2%{?dist}" is not proper. Please check the section "Package Release" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines - For Requires(post/postun), please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets - "env JAVA_HOME=%{java_home} ant" can be substituted with %ant macro (defined in %_sysconfdir/rpm/macros.jpackage in jpacakage-utils package, which is required by java-1.7.0-icedtea and so on) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141850.m0EIob7B006179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-14 13:50 EST ------- I'll email him. I need some mono and other mono based packages in epel branch in order to build some mine. So, Paul, if you want to co-maintain too, you're welcome ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141853.m0EIrJmQ006507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-14 13:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - "env JAVA_HOME=%{java_home} ant" can be substituted with s|can be substituted with|can be replaced by| > %ant macro ( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:00:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:00:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141900.m0EJ0rY7026373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-01-14 14:00 EST ------- No, not yet. I applied a one line fix to the spec, and I'm testing it on my buildfarm. Will finish soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 18:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141859.m0EIxwOC007418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-14 13:59 EST ------- Which packages are needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141916.m0EJGS7P029246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jwulf at redhat.com 2008-01-14 14:16 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291615) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291615&action=view) proposed documentation-devil logo from teh community -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:16:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:16:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141916.m0EJG4lr010787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jwulf at redhat.com 2008-01-14 14:16 EST ------- I knew about the *-devel namespace thing, since I've been a Fedora user since 1.92, and I knew that this hurdle would come up. Of course, my opinion didn't carry much weight because it's an undocumented convention, and they were doing things by the book. It's a good point that it isn't written down anywhere. Warren made some nice technical observations that could serve as a basis for making this into an explicit policy. I'd imagine that since this package already has a significant community around it once it gets included in Fedora we'll find a lot of those people more active in Fedora. Being "internal" to Red Hat doesn't make you any less of a community member. I was a Fedora user before I joined Red Hat, and I'll be one after I'm gone. As far as the name for the package goes, when considering a package name, as seasoned hands know, the overriding consideration, beyond all technical concerns, and especially when you're talking community, is "how will it look on a t-shirt?" I'd definitely wear a t-shirt with "Endoculator" on it, and someone sent me a logo proposal for "Documentation-devil", which I'll attach to the bug. I've already ordered a t-shirt from Cafe Press. Even it doesn't end up as the package name, it can be a momento of this bug. :-) Get yours here: http://www.cafepress.com/cp/customize/product.aspx?clear=true&number=%20213953185 So I'm +1 on Endoculator or documentation-devil for a package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141926.m0EJQSC0031254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-14 14:26 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint checks return: dropbear.src:81: W: macro-in-%changelog setup dropbear.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 82, tab: line 1) Both of these are trivial, but you really shouldn't use macros in %changelog, because rpm will try to evaluate them. Safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (97f31bbe1d36f156ec895de97ecc1d400da5f0e5) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. Go ahead and request sponsorship, as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#head-a601c13b0950a89568deafa65f505b4b58ee869b -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141931.m0EJVgLS032107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 14:31 EST ------- No reason, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:45:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141945.m0EJju7C002125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 14:45 EST ------- README should be in %doc. Also the source may change while the source name remains the same. I don't think this is an issue, but you may want to rename it anyway to avoid ambiguities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:53:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:53:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141953.m0EJrwrF017586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at deadbabylon.de 2008-01-14 14:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > cvs done. Thx > Any particular reason for the cvsextras commits: no? Out of habit. I don't want every new maintainer to be able to make changes to this package (see the discussion on fedora-devel-list some time ago). In my opinion the kde-sig should be sufficent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141956.m0EJuxUF004004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 14:56 EST ------- Also, and more importantly, the build is missing... The .dtx and .ins are installed, but not the .cls... A simple latex simplecv.ins should do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:54:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428565] Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801141954.m0EJsKs4003350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dragonplayer - A simple video player for KDE 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428565 fedora at deadbabylon.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 19:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428718] New: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718 Summary: Review Request: python-svn - Python bindings for Subversion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: timothy.selivanow at virtualxistenz.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn.spec SRPM URL: http://yum.virtualxistenz.com/python-svn/python-svn-1.5.2-3.f8.src.rpm Description: Pythonic style bindings for Subversion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 20:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:08:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142008.m0EK8AxU020771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 kwade at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com 2008-01-14 15:08 EST ------- Lightweight reply while I'm adding myself to the Cc:; ignore if you wish. :) (In reply to comment #55) > I knew about the *-devel namespace thing, since I've been a Fedora user since > 1.92, and I knew that this hurdle would come up. Of course, my opinion didn't > carry much weight because it's an undocumented convention, and they were doing > things by the book. > > It's a good point that it isn't written down anywhere. Warren made some nice > technical observations that could serve as a basis for making this into an > explicit policy. We started work on the Fedora Get Involved Guide (GIG) this week: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/GetInvolvedGuide ... which is what Paul's (Frields) "Developer Guide" hackfest session turned in to. One shakeout from this should be finding similar holes and assumptions in the packaging process, which comprises a majority of the GIG content. I'm certain the missing content about the *-devel convention is going to get fixed now. :) > I'd imagine that since this package already has a significant community around > it once it gets included in Fedora we'll find a lot of those people more active > in Fedora. Being "internal" to Red Hat doesn't make you any less of a community > member. I was a Fedora user before I joined Red Hat, and I'll be one after I'm gone. Agreed; I didn't meant to imply anything else or to assign different values to different communities. It was an observation that explained the disconnection up to this point. > As far as the name for the package goes, when considering a package name, as > seasoned hands know, the overriding consideration, beyond all technical > concerns, and especially when you're talking community, is "how will it look on > a t-shirt?" Darn tootin'! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 20:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:28:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427662] Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142028.m0EKSJgb010102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpipe - Counting pipe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427662 ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-14 15:28 EST ------- > Why you are using group Development/Tools ? It has nothing with development. > I think better group is defined upstream: Applications/Archiving, or may be > Applications/System. I don't know, Applications/Archiving was too strange andnarrow, Applications/System is possible. > %{__chmod} 0644 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}* > - it is not necessary, just add %attr(0644, root, root) before this file in > %files section. I like it this way, as it clearly signal that something is wrong. > Some developers does not like macros like "%{__rm}" or "%{__make}". I prefer to use macros in my packages. > Why cpipe is better like program "pv" already included in Fedora? > Do we need both of them? I see no harm in including cpipe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 20:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427171] Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142033.m0EKXU7l011016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sqliteman - Manager for sqlite - Sqlite Databases Made Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427171 terjeros at phys.ntnu.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-14 15:33 EST ------- Pushed for rawhide, F-8 and F-7. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 20:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225669] Merge Review: ctags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142036.m0EKaAXl025543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: ctags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225669 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From terjeros at phys.ntnu.no 2008-01-14 15:36 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 20:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] New: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: agospoda at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/wiggle/wiggle.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/wiggle/wiggle-0.6-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: Wiggle is a program for applying patches that 'patch' cannot apply due to conflicting changes in the original. Wiggle will always apply all changes in the patch to the original. If it cannot find a way to cleanly apply a patch, it inserts it in the original in a manner similar to 'merge', and report an unresolvable conflict. This is the first package I've submitted for inclusion in Fedora. Additional i686 versions for rhel4 and rhel5 are available here: http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/#wiggle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:12:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:12:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142112.m0ELCmD9017482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-14 16:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #44) > Will this easily work on Fedora 7 and Fedora 8 as well? > What about RHEL5? (It could be added to EPEL5.) We currently have this building in brew for RHEL 4 & 5. Some people who use Fedora hook up to our noarch repo for RHEL5 and run those packages on Fedora 7, 8 and Raw Hide. No issues have been reported by those users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:22:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142122.m0ELMPl1019001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at redhat.com 2008-01-14 16:22 EST ------- I don't have time to do any mono work for EPEL, its fine for Xavier and Paul to take these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142117.m0ELHnM5018271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 buytenh at wantstofly.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From buytenh at wantstofly.org 2008-01-14 16:17 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dropbear Short Description: SSH2 server and client Owners: buytenh Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] New: libgweather - A library for weather information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Description: libgweather is a library to access weather information from online services for numerous locations. It was previously part of the gnome-applets package, but is now being moved out to avoid a circular dependency between gnome-panel and gnome-applets. Spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/libgweather.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/libgweather-2.21.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142131.m0ELVhEN020510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From agospoda at redhat.com 2008-01-14 16:31 EST ------- I got the licensing wrong, so I just updated wiggle.spec with this change: --- wiggle.spec.orig 2008-01-14 16:18:54.000000000 -0500 +++ wiggle.spec 2008-01-14 16:19:00.000000000 -0500 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: A tool for applying patches with conflicts Group: Development/Tools -License: GPL +License: GPLv2+ URL: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/wiggle/ Source0: http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/wiggle/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Patch0: wiggle-various-changes.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:47:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:47:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427464] Review Request: mono-zeroconf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142147.m0ELlUon023121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-zeroconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427464 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 16:47 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426349] Review Request: mono-addins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142145.m0ELj3tq004558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mono-addins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426349 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 16:45 EST ------- Is that short description right? Typically you would want to use the Summary from the package spec, in this case "Addins for mono"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142149.m0ELnfTj004981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 16:49 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:50:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142150.m0ELoil9005429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 16:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Regarding the unversionned obsolete and requires I don't know > if it is right or not, given that the package name may change > in the future and become xdvi. > I am inclined to simply change it to Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release} Obsoloetes: xdvi < 22.84.12 Objections? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 21:57:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142157.m0ELv0as024664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From mhideo at redhat.com 2008-01-14 16:56 EST ------- (In reply to comment #56) > Created an attachment (id=291615) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291615&action=view) [edit] > proposed documentation-devil logo from teh community > lol, you JBoss guys crack me up! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142214.m0EMEwHQ027517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 17:14 EST ------- A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should be obsoleted (if xdvi is). The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why somebody would want to package it. In fact it may have been unfortunate that I (I think it was me in a patch fro texlive.spec) called it xdvi and not xdvik. However it is not that obvious since it certainly makes sense to have yum install xdvi installs xdvik. Maybe one possibility could be to drop completely the Obsoletes: xdvi and leave Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release} This will hurt the rawhide texlive users but maybe it would be better. Another possiblity could be Obsoloetes: xdvi = 22.84.12 That way the xdvi in rawhide is obsoleted without much side-effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:19:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428748] Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142219.m0EMJKjm009917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |188611 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428748] New: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428748 Summary: Review Request: ltspfs - LTSP filesystem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs.spec http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/ltspfs-0.4.2-0.20080114.fc8.src.rpm Description: Fuse based remote filesystem for LTSP thin clients LtspFS is a remote filesystem consisting of two parts: 1) A network server daemon that runs on the LTSP terminal. 2) A FUSE module that runs in userspace on the server, that connects with the daemon on the client. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:24:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:24:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142224.m0EMObFb028890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-14 17:24 EST ------- Andy, are you already sponsored? If not, you have to follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored and also make this review block bug 177841 ( FE-NEEDSPONSOR ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142239.m0EMdPER012971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 17:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should > be obsoleted (if xdvi is). > Yes, sorry, I meant Obsoletes: xdvi <=22.84.12 > The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it > is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why > somebody would want to package it. Yes.. but it's dead upstream ... no release since 2004... xdvik is essentially upstream now. > In fact it may have been > unfortunate that I (I think it was me in a patch fro > texlive.spec) called it xdvi and not xdvik. However it is > not that obvious since it certainly makes sense to have > yum install xdvi installs xdvik. > Yes, we definately want yum install xdvi to do the right thing. > Maybe one possibility could be to drop completely the > Obsoletes: xdvi > > and leave > Provides: xdvi = %{version}-%{release} > I am happy with that... > This will hurt the rawhide texlive users but maybe it would be > better. I don't think it will, since the xdvi in rawhide is at version 22.84.12-8.fc9, so rawhide users will just see an updated package. Did I miss something? On balance i think the last choice is probably best -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:43:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142243.m0EMhhCm013673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > A first note is that it seems to me that 22.84.12 should > > be obsoleted (if xdvi is). > > > > Yes, sorry, I meant Obsoletes: xdvi <=22.84.12 > > > The issue I see is that the xdvi package exists and it > > is a different upstream. However I can't see a reason why > > somebody would want to package it. > > Yes.. but it's dead upstream ... no release since 2004... xdvik is essentially > upstream now. > Ooops, I meant xdvi is dead upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:00:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:00:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142300.m0EN0qM6002464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package > names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even > when the virtual provides is higher. > Hm, ok, that looks like a bug to me. > Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes, > rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm > doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of > conflicts. > > So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that > Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12 > is the cleanest. OK, we'll go with that, simple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142258.m0EMwjPV001755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-14 17:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > I don't think it will, since the xdvi in rawhide is at version 22.84.12-8.fc9, > so rawhide users will just see an updated package. Did I miss something? Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even when the virtual provides is higher. Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes, rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of conflicts. So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12 is the cleanest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 22:59:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:59:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142259.m0EMxlS8016619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-14 17:59 EST ------- I've fixed some initial comments: license field is GPL+ now, and tabs have been exterminated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142309.m0EN911v018579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:09 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xdvik Short Description: An X viewer for DVI files Owners: jgu,pertusus,jnovy Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142307.m0EN7AWD018468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:07 EST ------- Spec URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik.spec SRPM URL: http://jgu.fedorapeople.org/xdvik-22.84.13-4.fc9.src.rpm * Mon Jan 14 2008 Jonathan G. Underwood - 22.84.13-4 - Use bcond for Japanese conditional stuff (Patrice Dumas) - Fix license (Patrice Dumas) - Make desktop file scriplets conform to packaging guidelines (Patrice Dumas) - Remove unneeded Requires (Patrice Dumas) - Adjust Provides and Obsoletes of xdvi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142327.m0ENRUCU021249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-14 18:27 EST ------- You are right, of course, on both accounts. :-) I have uploaded a new release (2) to http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/ with these issues fixed. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:52:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801142352.m0ENqxwY010028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 agospoda at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From agospoda at redhat.com 2008-01-14 18:52 EST ------- Thanks, Manuel. I forgot to add the blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 14 23:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428761] New: Review Request: amora - a mobile remote assistant Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428761 Summary: Review Request: amora - a mobile remote assistant Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/amora/amora.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/amora/amora-0.9-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Amora is an application that enables you to control your PC desktop using a cellphone. It uses bluetooth to send mouse and keyboard events to the graphical session. With it you can control your slides in OpenOffice.org, movies or any other application. Amora also has a screenshot feature, where you can see a thumbnail in the cellphone screen of the currently focused window in your desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 00:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150002.m0F02tA2011697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From bforte at redhat.com 2008-01-14 19:02 EST ------- A Printer's Devil was an assistant or apprentice to a Printer. They mixed inks, fetched supplies, re-filled type trays, carried paper and generally did all the scut work the Printer didn't want to do anymore. The term's origins are uncertain with the assistants to William Caxton (who was named Deville) and Aldus Manutius (who was a Moor) both being credited by different sources. OTOH, printing was also seen as akin to the Black Arts in its early days in Europe (not surprising given the Church's desire to remain the sole source of Truth). Throw in the tendency of printers and apprentice printers to get covered in black ink and the idea they might be devils wasn't a massive leap to mediaeval folk, raised to believe black = bad. Consequently, the Printer's Devil was sometimes something other than a put-upon worker. It has also referred to an imp which supposedly came out at night and indulged in mischief, re-arranging type trays, moving letters around on already set type and so on. Both these uses make documentation-devil (or 'Docs devil', to use what I suspect would quickly become the use-name) almost perfect as a package name. Docs devil is an assistant to a writer, doing scut work we don't want to do (and shouldn't have to do) and it's a convenient scapegoat for those magic typos that only appear after the book has gone public. That this name also preserves, forever, the argument that erupted about the package's name adds appropriate Linux-specific lore. This lore is eminently suitable for adding colour and interest to the introductory chapters of future books documenting Docs devil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 00:16:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150016.m0F0GaXp013589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-14 19:16 EST ------- Thanks Alexander. Paul, we'll talk about it on ML or somewhere else if you don't mind. CVS Change Request =================== Package name : mono Owners : alexl, laxathom New branch : EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 00:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150045.m0F0jcbF031824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-14 19:45 EST ------- A few comments: The URL given in the spec is 403 (no permission) for me. The package fails to build: nroff -man wiggle.1 > wiggle.man /bin/sh: nroff: command not found make: *** [wiggle.man] Error 127 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44906 (%build) Looks like you need BuildRequires: groff The package seems to have a test suite; it should be called in a %check section. Unfortunately it looks like the makefile calls it as part of the build process, but you could just call the wiggle and wiggle.man targets manually. The package doesn't build with the proper compiler flags, because the makefile tkes the ill-advised step of overriding CFLAGS. That will need to be patched out or worked around so the compiler is called with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 00:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:51:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150051.m0F0pXS7017802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-14 19:51 EST ------- Made these fixes (+ some others) New URLs: Spec: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind.spec SRPM: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind-0.9.0-0.1.Beta_15_icon_butterfly.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 00:52:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:52:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150052.m0F0qFwq032568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From lbrindle at redhat.com 2008-01-14 19:52 EST ------- > That this name also preserves, forever, the argument that erupted about the package's name adds > appropriate Linux-specific lore. This lore is eminently suitable for adding colour and interest to the > introductory chapters of future books documenting Docs devil. ... and will form a suitable wikipedia entry in years to come ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:07:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150107.m0F17CcW002858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:07 EST ------- Hi, Jason. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:04:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150104.m0F14cn5002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jwulf at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:04 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291662) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291662&action=view) One does not simply "name a package in Fedora", just as... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150104.m0F14YN6001966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ccurran at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ccurran at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ccurran at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:04 EST ------- +1 to Loremaster Brian's input. As for any opposition to devil being in the title there are already plenty of open source projects with the word devil in the title. A quick goole will reveal that or just check this link, http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&type_of_search=soft&words=devil The horse on that issue has long bolted from the gate. I've got no issues with the name. We could even append Brain Forte's brief history of printing in Europe to the man for the package. Can someone just take ownership of this bug so it can get in fedora? Christoph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:11:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150111.m0F1BjFS003610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From afitzsim at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:11 EST ------- one does not simply rock into mordor! http://farm1.static.flickr.com/43/87366880_1b05bf99e2.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:18:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150118.m0F1IUN6021532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From afitzsim at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291664) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291664&action=view) project image endoculator are belong to us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150127.m0F1R1fU022984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-01-14 20:27 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postgresql-plruby Short Description: PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language Owners: devrim Branches: F-7 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: devrim Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150126.m0F1Qhdm005806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-01-14 20:26 EST ------- New Spec: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby.spec New SRPM: http://developer.postgresql.org/~devrim/rpms/other/plruby/postgresql-plruby-0.5.1-5.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 01:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150141.m0F1fgbP009128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From ccurran at redhat.com 2008-01-14 20:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291667) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291667&action=view) sparta Just to carry on with the humourous vein of previous posts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 02:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150206.m0F26ngv028842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 21:06 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 02:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150208.m0F28lAN013304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 21:08 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 02:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150204.m0F24bEI012498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-14 21:04 EST ------- cvs done. Any reason for the cvsextras commits no? This will make it harder for people to assist you with this package if you aren't available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 02:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150231.m0F2VMlr017018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2008-01-14 21:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #62) > Can someone just take ownership of this bug so it can get in fedora? Please see comment 52. I think the review is currently waiting the submission of an updated package. Good to see all the openness about the new name. I am not going to express any opinions - though I would recommend something reasonably short and maybe without a hyphen since that would give a stronger identity to the project I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 02:39:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150239.m0F2dTf9017767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-14 21:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #67) > (In reply to comment #62) > > Can someone just take ownership of this bug so it can get in fedora? > > Please see comment 52. I think the review is currently waiting the submission > of an updated package. Can people please be patient, getting approval to tool around with your production environment takes time. > Good to see all the openness about the new name. > I am not going to express any opinions - though I would recommend > something reasonably short and maybe without a hyphen since that would give > a stronger identity to the project I believe. I told them Pants was a damn fine name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:12:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:12:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226504] Merge Review: tsclient In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150312.m0F3CtmL005805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: tsclient https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226504 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davidz at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-14 22:12 EST ------- Adding davidz to this ticket I am doing this b/c he is listed as the owner in the pkgdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150327.m0F3RFMg008242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 22:27 EST ------- SHOULD: 1)Though not mandatory you can add disttag. 2)Remove following Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig 3) Good to have defattr used as now %defattr(-,root,root,-) 4) Correct changelog version. Sorry that I should I asked this previously before you built new release. Can you please do that again. Once above issues fixed in CVS. This package will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150334.m0F3Ye4B008972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(karsten at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:35:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150335.m0F3ZHDI009443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:45:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150345.m0F3jZ7M010654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mnagy at redhat.com) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 22:45 EST ------- 1)MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. 2) Follow initscript scriptlet as given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-b638e19c644263af59762a3154a60554a8303bb3 missing Requires(preun): /sbin/service and Requires(postun): /sbin/service 3)Wherever applicable please keep timestamp from files being copied from upstream tarball. see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab 4)Also, good to follow parallel make as given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-525c7d76890cb22df33b759c65c35c82bf434d2e SHOULD: 1)If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246793] Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150352.m0F3q357011395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: postgresql-plruby - PostgreSQL Ruby Procedural Language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246793 devrim at commandprompt.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From devrim at commandprompt.com 2008-01-14 22:52 EST ------- I'm always open to co-maintainers -- and this package is not updated frequently, so I don't expect a problem. Mamoru: Thanks for the review and patience. Kevin: Thanks for the CVS. Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:59:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411551] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150359.m0F3xXW1028153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class - Extensible and flexible object <-> relational mapper Alias: perl-DBIx-Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411551 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(cweyl at alumni.drew. | |edu) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 22:59 EST ------- I think you can still add some more BR to let make test pass like Test::Pod::Coverage http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=349282&name=build.log Can you please check that and make modification in SPEC? Also, I see rpmlint output as perl-DBIx-Class.src:54: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(DBIx::Class::ClassResolver::PassThrough) The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 03:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:58:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150358.m0F3wB1L012127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From agospoda at redhat.com 2008-01-14 22:58 EST ------- Thanks for the tips, Jason. It's interesting that the link for the specfile didn't work. Here's a new one and a new srpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/wiggle/wiggle.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/wiggle/wiggle-0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm I made the suggested changes to the Makefile and included groff as a build requirement in the specfile. You should always be able to find the latest versions from my people page (at least until wiggle makes it into rawhide): http://people.redhat.com/agospoda/#wiggle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:03:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150403.m0F43j4h013157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 23:03 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a5725525d32d37a07d57cbac6315d6aa Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs t/01..............ok t/02..............ok t/pod-coverage....ok t/pod.............ok All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=15, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.87 cusr + 0.07 csys = 0.94 CPU) exit 0 + Package perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple-1.04-1.fc9 => Provides: perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Simple) = 1.04 perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel::Simple::_Sheet) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226072] Merge Review: libXfontcache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150428.m0F4SrDJ032058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXfontcache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226072 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:29:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226073] Merge Review: libXfont In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150429.m0F4T1W5016360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226073 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226084] Merge Review: libXrender In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150432.m0F4WJse017029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXrender https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226084 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 23:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream dc266e850c51368f964e0d67bf5fb5e6 libXrender-0.9.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xrender.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:32:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226083] Merge Review: libXrandr In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150432.m0F4WMPB032679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXrandr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226083 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-14 23:32 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream 1b244b5d19f0ccab01d7083436cd3558 libXrandr-1.2.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xrandr.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 04:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150445.m0F4jgU9018814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 ------- Additional Comments From cchance at redhat.com 2008-01-14 23:45 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291676) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291676&action=view) srpm 20070116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:06:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226082] Merge Review: libXp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150506.m0F562iV021659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226082 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXp-1.0.0-10.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 00:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is ok to accept libXp.src:63: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}" as this is side effect of patch + source match upstream 0f4ac39108c1ae8c443cdfac259b58fa libXp-1.0.0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xp.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:06:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226081] Merge Review: libXpm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150506.m0F564vR004913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226081 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXpm-3.5.7-3.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 00:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream cd15ee542d9f515538b4462a6f79d977 libXpm-3.5.7.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xpm.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:15:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:15:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428776] New: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 Summary: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gouldwp at auburn.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SPECS/perl-SNMP-Info.spec SRPM URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SRPMS/perl-SNMP-Info-1.04-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: SNMP::Info gives an object oriented interface to information obtained through SNMP. This is my first fedora extras package and therefore, I will be needing a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module FE-NEEDSPONSOR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150522.m0F5Mfl8023580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module FE-NEEDSPONSOR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: perl-SNMP- |Review Request: perl-SNMP- |Info - SNMP::Info perl |Info - SNMP::Info perl |module |module FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428777] Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150538.m0F5cTFR008536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428777 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: perl-Net- |Review Request: perl-Net- |NBName - Net::NBName perl |NBName - Net::NBName perl |module |module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150537.m0F5bLas008475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: perl-SNMP- |Review Request: perl-SNMP- |Info - SNMP::Info perl |Info - SNMP::Info perl |module FE-NEEDSPONSOR |module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428777] New: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428777 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gouldwp at auburn.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SPECS/perl-Net-NBName.spec SRPM URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SRPMS/perl-Net-NBName-0.26-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: Net::NBName is a class that allows you to perform simple NetBIOS Name Service Requests in your Perl code. It performs these NetBIOS operations over TCP/IP using Perl's built-in socket support. This is my first fedora extras package and therefore, I need a sponsor. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428779] Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150546.m0F5kBBB009663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428779 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: perl- |Review Request: perl- |Storable - Storable perl |Storable - Storable perl |module |module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:45:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:45:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428779] New: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428779 Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gouldwp at auburn.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SPECS/perl-Storable.spec SRPM URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SRPMS/perl-Storable-2.18-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The Storable package brings persistence to your Perl data structures containing SCALAR, ARRAY, HASH or REF objects, i.e. anything that can be conveniently stored to disk and retrieved at a later time. This is my first fedora extras package and therefore, I am looking for a sponsor. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428780] New: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gouldwp at auburn.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SPECS/perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession.spec SRPM URL: http://niscripts.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/rpms/SRPMS/perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: This module integrates Apache::Session into Mason by adding methods to the Mason Request object available in all Mason components. This is my first fedora extras package and therefore, I am needing a sponsor. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 05:53:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150553.m0F5rQPk026983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | Summary|Review Request: perl-MasonX-|Review Request: perl-MasonX- |Request-WithApacheSession - |Request-WithApacheSession - |Integrates Apache::Session |Integrates Apache::Session |into Mason |into Mason -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 06:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150614.m0F6E1Ba030023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-15 01:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) Rebuild failed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=349310 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=349310&name=root.log This root.log shows that your srpm itself is corrupted. Also for me "rpm -ivh " caused "error: unpacking of archive failed". Would you recheck your srpm itself and reupload the new one? BTW IMO the "0.X.Beta15%{?dist}" is enough for release number (please consider to use dist tag: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 06:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 01:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428779] Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150639.m0F6dl1t001043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428779 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel- | |list at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-15 01:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > This is my first fedora extras package and therefore, I am looking for > a sponsor. A very unfortunate choice of a package to get involved into Fedora ;) perl(Storable) is one of the dual-lifed perl modules, which upstream perl ships as part of the main perl package as well as an independent module. As such, perl(Storable) is part of the main perl package in Fedora, which means it can not easily be replaced by a perl-add-on package. I.e. I regret, but this package can't be added to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 07:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226093] Merge Review: libXv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150702.m0F72ZBt004504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226093 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 02:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream f1c4109fa804aeaf7188b66c5cdd9f57 libXv-1.0.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xv.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 07:02:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226070] Merge Review: libXext In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150702.m0F72XqV019891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXext https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226070 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 02:02 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream d7f3f752d291865108689c889d160ea0 libXext-1.0.1.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xext.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 07:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226090] Merge Review: libXt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150706.m0F76ndp005282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226090 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 02:06 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream 937735f342c046db239852fec0413f6c libXt-1.0.4.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xt.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 07:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226091] Merge Review: libXtst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150705.m0F75HQu005237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXtst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226091 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 02:05 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). + rpmlint output is Silent. + source match upstream 090c1ad04e34982eada5cf3b1a0792fd libXtst-1.0.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains contents. + no static libraries. + xtst.pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + ldconfig scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 07:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150712.m0F7CvjC005968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-15 02:12 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta-0.0.1-0.1.20080115svn761510.fc8.src.rpm - Update to revision 761510 - Enable package_kpart - Add missing ldconfig scriptlets for the shared libraries The only rpmlint complaint left is the no-documentation one which is basically upstream's fault for not including a COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 08:47:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:47:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150847.m0F8lbRn001361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 03:47 EST ------- 1)rpmlint on binary RPM gave me pinfo.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pinforc ==>from SPEC its clear that its purposefully done. SHOULD: Can you follow scriptlet guidelines for install-info as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-47896da5fb2662d75deefeb9ba75145a398515db Do you want to build new version for this or you want to fix scriptlet next time you release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 08:47:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150847.m0F8loYD018422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 08:53:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 03:53:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150853.m0F8rETI002221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mbacovsk at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 03:53 EST ------- 1) use macros. replace /usr/bin with %{_bindir}and /usr/lib with %{_libdir} 2)you can even write defattr as defattr(-,root,root,-) 3)buildroot is wrong make it similar to given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-b4fdd45fa76cbf54c885ef0836361319ab962473 4)rpmlint gave me psutils.i386: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog psutils.i386: W: invalid-license distributable psutils.i386: W: no-url-tag psutils.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib psutils.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file /tmp/psutils-1.17-27.fc9.src.rpm.4019/psutils.spec psutils.src:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/psutils psutils.src:141: W: macro-in-%changelog attr psutils.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog psutils.src: W: invalid-license distributable psutils.src: W: no-url-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150902.m0F92WiT004511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: psutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 04:02 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291696) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291696&action=view) Modified SPEC Only you need to add correct License tag here which I think is "Freely redistributable without restriction" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427273] Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150900.m0F90VvF003579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: firstaidkit - System Rescue Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427273 jgranado at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jgranado at redhat.com 2008-01-15 04:00 EST ------- firstaidkit successfully built. closing :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150904.m0F94YAf021680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-15 04:04 EST ------- I have added a postun script line without the corresponding Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils >= %{desktop_file_utils_version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:05:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150905.m0F95Dg2005209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Flag|needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-15 04:05 EST ------- What's wrong with the scriptlet? It seems to follow the guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:00:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:00:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150900.m0F90Dtv020460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-15 04:00 EST ------- The .cls should be the only installed file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:18:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150918.m0F9IpIr024122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-15 04:18 EST ------- I know that, although there are precedents. :-) See /usr/share/texmf/ptex/platex/base/ as an example. Initially I thought about creating a subpackage that would require tetex-doc (or texlive-doc) and would install the processed dtx file in the same hierarchy under tetex-doc directories, in this case: /usr/share/texmf/doc/latex/simplecv/ What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:31:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:31:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150931.m0F9VR7G026484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 04:31 EST ------- If you think its ok then I don't mind. I just want to make sure it follows exactly whats written on packaging guidelines page. In SPEC its, %post /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/pinfo.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir : %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/pinfo.info.gz %{_infodir}/dir fi : suggested one is %post /sbin/install-info %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : %preun if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete %{_infodir}/%{name}.info %{_infodir}/dir || : fi I think rest packaging looks Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:42:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150942.m0F9gRoi028178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 karsten at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(karsten at redhat.com| |) | ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2008-01-15 04:42 EST ------- - I've added disttag - Why should I remove the requirements ? The package runs ldconfig in post and postun and needs to require them. Or is there any new guideline that I'm not aware of ? If so, can you give me a pointer to it ? - defattr changed to -,root,root,- new package is libcap-1.10-32.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150943.m0F9hZLe028369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-15 04:43 EST ------- I usually prefer ":" as separate command. It's mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-ac070867bcfda441b0ae7690be90ac16b43894e8 Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:43:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 253588] Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150943.m0F9hlt7028410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-cil - CIL - Infrastructure for C Program Analysis and Transformation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253588 rjones at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From rjones at redhat.com 2008-01-15 04:43 EST ------- Probably won't be this week, but it's still on my list ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226297] Merge Review: pinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150945.m0F9jsq4028990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: pinfo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226297 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 04:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I usually prefer ":" as separate command. It's mentioned in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-ac070867bcfda441b0ae7690be90ac16b43894e8 > No issues. I just tried to make sure following "The "|| :" in this case prevents failures that would typically affect systems that have been configured not to install any %doc files, or have read-only mounted, %_netsharedpath /usr/share." > Thanks for the review. Welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 09:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801150949.m0F9nhMY029274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 04:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > - I've added disttag > - Why should I remove the requirements ? The package runs ldconfig in post and > postun and needs to require them. Or is there any new guideline that I'm not > aware of ? If so, can you give me a pointer to it ? > - defattr changed to -,root,root,- > > new package is libcap-1.10-32.fc9 Thanks. I saw http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#head-d0dbcb7eec27622a21df280009c5b089b02f5bef requirements are not mentioned there and even newer packages that got reviewed are not using that syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151006.m0FA69nt015964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-15 05:06 EST ------- I don't think it is right. The installed file should be the pdf or dvi file. So indeed you need to do something along latex simplecv.dtx or pdflatex simplecv.dtx Then there is the issue about what to do with the .pdf and/or .dvi file generated, put them in %doc or in /usr/share/texmf/doc/latex/simplecv/ I don't have an answer for that. Maybe worth asking on the packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:11:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151011.m0FABkST000732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 ------- Additional Comments From karsten at redhat.com 2008-01-15 05:11 EST ------- You're right, the '%post -p' syntax will get parsed by find-requires and it isn't necessary to add that requirement manually (although it doesn't do any harm either) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:10:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427611] Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151010.m0FAAUWs016563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: translate-toolkit - Translation tools for PO and XLIFF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427611 ------- Additional Comments From dwayne at translate.org.za 2008-01-15 05:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > No he didn't say that I can take over maintainership, > > > I'd prefer that to still be the case as I > > don't think I have time or experience to be the maintainer: > > Well, I have to understand the current situation correctly. > - Do you want to co-maintain translate-toolkit with Roozbeh? > (and is Roozbeh willing to accept it? If unsuer, would you > contact him/her?) I'd be happy to co-maintain, although I would most likely shift the responsibility onto someone within my organisation in due course. I'll contact Roosbeh and point to this bug for him to participate in this discussion. > - Or you don't want to even co-maintain translate-toolkit with > Roozbah? > > Note: > Currently translate-toolkit is open to cvsextras members, > which means that every person who maintains at least one package > on Fedora (including me) can make changes on translate-toolkit . > > So if you want I can update translate-toolkit to the latest version. > However I don't want to do so because I don't know what translate-toolkit > is at all and so I don't know how to check if the latest version > works well... I know what it does since I code on it, so am fully able to check the operation and validate dependencies, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:17:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151017.m0FAH7IE001496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2008-01-15 05:17 EST ------- Should I not be down as an owner on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151028.m0FASBCU019088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-15 05:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > I don't think it is right. The installed file should be the > pdf or dvi file. My fault for not explaining this but believe it, or not, what I wrote above meant exactly this. :-) >So indeed you need to do something along > > latex simplecv.dtx > or > pdflatex simplecv.dtx > > Then there is the issue about what to do with the .pdf and/or > .dvi file generated, put them in %doc or in > > /usr/share/texmf/doc/latex/simplecv/ > > I don't have an answer for that. Maybe worth asking on the > packaging list. That was my question. :-) Also sooner or later we need to develop some guidelines for (la)tex packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226318] Merge Review: procmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151027.m0FARqBa019037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: procmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226318 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 05:27 EST ------- rpmlint on binary rpm reported=> procmail.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/lockfile mail 02755 procmail.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/lockfile 02755 For this package above looks ok. License tag is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428793] New: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is my first package and I need a sponsor. Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/xhtml2fo-style-xsl.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/xhtml2fo-style-xsl-20050106-1.src.rpm Description: These XSL stylesheets allow you to transform any XHTML document to FO. With a XSL:FO processor you could create PDF versions of XHTML documents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151056.m0FAujXR007379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 ------- Additional Comments From ismael at olea.org 2008-01-15 05:56 EST ------- FYI: I've have another new request on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 10:56:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428798] New: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Summary: Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com This is my first package and I need a sponsor. FYI: I've have another new request on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/omegat.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/OmegaT-1.7.3-2olea.src.rpm Description: OmegaT is a free translation memory application written in Java. It is a tool intended for professional translators. It does not translate for you! OmegaT has the following features: * Fuzzy matching * Match propagation * Simultaneous processing of multiple-file projects * Simultaneous use of multiple translation memories * External glossaries * Document file formats: XHTML and HTML Microsoft Office 2007 XML OpenOffice.org/StarOffice XLIFF (Okapi) MediaWiki (Wikipedia) Plain text * Unicode (UTF-8) support: can be used with non-Latin alphabets * Support for right-to-left languages * Compatible with other translation memory applications (TMX) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226047] Merge Review: libtermcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151102.m0FB2CmF008342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtermcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226047 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co | |m) ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:02 EST ------- is this package still part of Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:03:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:03:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226485] Merge Review: termcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151103.m0FB3Rlr024813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: termcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226485 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:03 EST ------- is this package still part of Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:02:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226485] Merge Review: termcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151102.m0FB2aCs024685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: termcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226485 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:10:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151110.m0FBAcAc026093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-15 06:10 EST ------- Not my day :-( - The file seems have been corrupted during transfer, new url below. - Added %{?dist}. Keeping long version for time beeing, there has been another plain 'Beta_15' floating around upstream until recently. This should and will be fixed before checking in. - Problems with mock. On a clean mock environment, build fails with "Bad build req: No Package Found for java-sdk-icedtea". However, "yum whatprovides java-sdk-icedtea" returns "java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel.x86_64 : IcedTea Development Environment" Don't know how to handle this. Builds in mock environment with icedtea devel package installed builds without problem. URL:s of today: Spec: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind.spec SRPM: http://hem.bredband.net/miko22/freemind-0.9.0-0.1.Beta_15_icon_butterfly.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:19:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:19:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226047] Merge Review: libtermcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151119.m0FBJASP027135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtermcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226047 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-15 06:19 EST ------- No, it was recently obsoleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226485] Merge Review: termcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151119.m0FBJPE1027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: termcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226485 mlichvar at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mlichvar at redhat.co| |m) | ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-15 06:19 EST ------- No, it was recently obsoleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:23:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226485] Merge Review: termcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151123.m0FBNwZW011458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: termcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226485 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:23 EST ------- I prefer to close this for now. If someone picks this and unorphans this reopen this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:23:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226047] Merge Review: libtermcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151123.m0FBNpoE011441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libtermcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226047 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:23 EST ------- I prefer to close this for now. If someone picks this and unorphans this reopen this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:32:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151132.m0FBWYPE029520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 kwizart at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:32 EST ------- starting review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:38:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151138.m0FBcXjb030397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 buytenh at wantstofly.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:51:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151151.m0FBpjga015871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 jonathan.underwood at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-15 06:51 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. Package imported into CVS and successfully built, closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 11:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151155.m0FBtKar016657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-15 06:55 EST ------- [7] I have to run configure and then create tar ball. Then I don't need kdelibs3, but my source differs from source on the web page. So what's the correct solution? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:09:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:09:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428545] Review Request: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CDs and DVDs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151209.m0FC9uAP018822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnomecatalog - Cataloging software for CDs and DVDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428545 marc at mwiriadi.id.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnomecatalog|Review Request: gnomecatalog |- Cataloging software for |- Cataloging software for |CDs and DVDs |CDs and DVDs ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-15 07:09 EST ------- New version released http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog.spec http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnomecatalog/gnomecatalog-0.3.3-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151212.m0FCCiXr019524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From leamas at bredband.net 2008-01-15 07:12 EST ------- Forget the mock issue, resolved after upgrading Alec to 0.2. Note: Alec is still in a pre-release state... ( I used wrong version argument to mock...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:14:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226144] Merge Review: minicom In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151214.m0FCEmDX019650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: minicom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226144 tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151227.m0FCR0GQ005430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 mmahut at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com)| ------- Additional Comments From mmahut at redhat.com 2008-01-15 07:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > [7] I have to run configure and then create tar ball. Then I don't need > kdelibs3, but my source differs from source on the web page. So what's the > correct solution? Why do you need first run configure and then create a tar archive? Can resolved it with a patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226422] Merge Review: slrn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151234.m0FCYKY8006321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: slrn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226422 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 07:34 EST ------- 1)good to have requires for -pull in following format - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} rest packaging looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151232.m0FCW6Ma006191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 07:32 EST ------- * You need to download the sources with wget -N in order to prevent timestamps changes -rw-rw-r-- 1 builder builder 335182 jan 11 16:37 ETL-0.04.10.tar.gz instead of -rw-rw-r-- 1 builder builder 335182 oct 10 04:37 ETL-0.04.10.tar.gz * if the package name is ETL-devel, the spec file have to be ETL-devel.spec * License is GPLv2+ - good * The package do not seems to be arch independent but only because it has ETL.pc in /usr/lib64 on lib64 system - seems strange * you need to use: make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -rw-r--r-- 1 builder builder 1249 jan 15 12:39 value instead of -rw-r--r-- 1 builder builder 1249 mar 16 2007 value * etl_profile.h is a config.h kind of file. usually it shouldn't be installed. same as etl_config.h - If upstream claims they are really needed, then it might be interesting to keep a timestamps reference from a file to avoid multiarches conflict (but only if they are the same on i386 and x86_64, and also ppc and ppc64 at least). Might be safe to remove ETL-config then. (and to patch dependant apps to use pkg-config if needed). see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks * The package bundle no library - as such it is not needed to have /sbin/ldconfig in post and postun. * pkg-config file: ETL.pc - it Requires only But includedir remains includedir=/usr/include instead of includedir=/usr/include/ETL as such they is a need to check if headers of dependent packages have ETL/spline or only spline (for example). Might need to test package that links against it... specially if others libs are missing. * As the package isn't marked as noarch (might evaluate if it could be with a tweak for pkg-config) a debuginfo is generated. If the package remains arch dependant, we might consider to use %define debug_package %{nil}. If the package could be noarch, then it might need to work on x86 x86_64 ppc ppc64 (and maybe others arch). then no debuginfo package will be created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:36:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151236.m0FCa1KX006794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-01-15 07:36 EST ------- Jonathan, would you mind if I commit some texlive <-> xdvi adjustments to the newly imported xdvi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:39:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151239.m0FCd7Rc023132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 07:39 EST ------- should be read: * pkg-config file: ETL.pc - it Requires only -lpthread koji scratch build request at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=350044 Looking at the headers looks differents or same for each arches... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428586] Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151254.m0FCssSJ025246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428586 a.badger at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-01-15 07:54 EST ------- Good: * spec matches the base package. * License is GPLv2+ * License is included with package. * Spec is coherent American English * Package builds and installs on i386 * Not a library Needswork: * Is this a pre-release snapshot? If so the release should be 0.1.20080114. [Fix attached] * Source needs to have instructions for retrieving from upstream (since it's a snapshot) [Fix attached] * Not all BuildRequires are listed: Needs gtk2-devel, does not need libtool [Fix attached] * Needs to own %{_datadir}/ldm [Fix attached] * rpmlint output:: ldm.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/ldm/ldm-script 0644 This looks like a script that is intended to start and stop services when a user logs into the box. Does it need to be executable? [Not fixed] Notes: * When upstream releases a tarball of this package it will likely be named ldm2 (judging from the tarball that make dist creates). Since the main binary is named ldm and we're not likely to package ldm1 ever, I think naming this package ldm is fine. * No locales are currently installed but there are some translations available. When those are installed, be sure to include them using %{find_lang} so that they are properly marked as language files. * Although this is a graphical application, it does not need a .desktop file because it does not run from a desktop session. Instead it is used to start a desktop session. I'll attach a new spec file in a moment that addresses most of the issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 12:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:58:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428586] Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151258.m0FCw56D009850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldm - LTSP Display Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428586 ------- Additional Comments From a.badger at gmail.com 2008-01-15 07:58 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291708) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291708&action=view) spec file solving most review issues This solves all review issues except whether /usr/share/ldm/ldm-script schould be executable and if so, whether it belongs in /usr/share/ or somewhere else like /usr/libexec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 13:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:03:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 411881] Package review: sim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151303.m0FD3HfM011127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: sim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411881 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-15 08:03 EST ------- Well yes, I can run configure and add to the patch created files ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 13:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:04:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151304.m0FD4qTQ011352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-15 08:04 EST ------- Sure, go ahead. I did go through the texlive xdvi patches and have included the ones that still seemed relevant - did I miss some? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 13:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412001] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151343.m0FDhbtH017319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412001 ------- Additional Comments From kvolny at redhat.com 2008-01-15 08:43 EST ------- as for the license issues, we'll have to wait at least until the number of "UNKNOWN" drops to zero: http://phidev.org/~dino/ufo/html/index.html ... a long run case I guess :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 13:54:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151354.m0FDsMgZ002550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-15 08:54 EST ------- Blocker: /usr/bin/ETL-config is not multilib ready. I recommend to re-write it as a wrapper around pkg-config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:13:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151413.m0FEDlOC006552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jnovy at redhat.com 2008-01-15 09:13 EST ------- The only I added is the fix for temporary files creation in xdvizilla. I haven't built it yet, so feel free to build it as soon as you think it's ready :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:21:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151421.m0FELEk2024826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: elinks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225725 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tyler.l.owen at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen at gmail.com 2008-01-15 09:21 EST ------- I accidently did the review on F8 not devel. The issues noted above are not in devel branch. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] New: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pvrabec at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/rpms/sectool/sectool-0.1.0-1.fc7.src.rpm Description: sectool is a security tool that can be used both as a security audit and intrusion detection system. It consists of set of tests, library and command line inerface tool. Tests are sorted into groups and security levels. Admins can run certain tests, groups or whole security levels. The library and the tools are implemented in python and tests are language independent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151426.m0FEQYKt025892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 mnagy at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mnagy at redhat.com) | ------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com 2008-01-15 09:26 EST ------- Updated in CVS. The missing require was added. Timestamps are now preserved. Make is now using %{?_smp_mflags} macro. I also fixed rdisc's init script (it didn't remove the lock file on stopping the service). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:33:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:33:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428007] Package review: cronie In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151433.m0FEX0B2026907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: cronie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428007 ------- Additional Comments From mmaslano at redhat.com 2008-01-15 09:32 EST ------- I think the upstream notes should move on upstream page https://fedorahosted.org/cronie/ and here should be discussed only packaging, rpmlint output and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:41:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151441.m0FEfxWO013836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 09:41 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291713) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291713&action=view) workaround for the pkgconfig on lib64 system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151441.m0FEf5iD028666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 09:41 EST ------- Thx for your advice Ralf: Actually the only difference between ppc and x86_64 (for example and expect for the pkgconfig path for libdir is: ---------------- diff -uNr usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h --- usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 +++ usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ /* Define to 1 if your processor stores words with the most significant byte first (like Motorola and SPARC, unlike Intel and VAX). */ -#define WORDS_BIGENDIAN 1 +/* #undef WORDS_BIGENDIAN */ /* define if the vsnprintf function is mangled */ /* #undef vsnprintf */ ---------- But this define isn't used elsewhere than in etl_profile.h. If we can consider this as a noach package, then we might need to rip out these lines... Instead of using ETL-config, i was think about having this: (see attachement) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:58:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:58:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428830] New: Review Request: python-pyasn1 - ASN.1 tools for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428830 Summary: Review Request: python-pyasn1 - ASN.1 tools for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rcritten at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-pyasn1.spec SRPM URL: http://rcritten.fedorapeople.org/python-pyasn1-0.0.7a-3.fc7.src.rpm Description: This project is dedicated to implementation of ASN.1 types (concrete syntax) and codecs (transfer syntaxes) for Python programming environment. ASN.1 compiler is planned for implementation in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 14:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:58:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151458.m0FEwfmk031359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From marc at mwiriadi.id.au 2008-01-15 09:58 EST ------- I have sent an email upstream to get some further information. I think it is prudent to talk to upstream to see where they view the current situation and what the best method is to go about sorting it out. If nothing comes of it I'll start working on patching what I can and trying to fix things. Thanks Nic for the updated Spec file that will come in handy. What I might do to get further information is to actually scan the source files of synfig to see what else is needed from in here as per one of your points then go from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 302271] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151501.m0FF1m6H018505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|panemade at gmail.com | Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 10:01 EST ------- Sorry I am leaving this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:05:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151505.m0FF5nwu001360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server Alias: perl-Net-FTPServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 10:05 EST ------- I prefer to move away from this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] New: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/bnocera/gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-settings-daemon-2.21.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A daemon to share settings from GNOME to other applications. It also handles global keybindings, as well as a number of desktop-wide settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:26:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151526.m0FFQWYb004853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 ------- Additional Comments From timc at inf.ed.ac.uk 2008-01-15 10:26 EST ------- > Style: CAPITAL letters in Summary: and Description looks odd. Can change this easily enough. Regards using %{_var|_libdir|_sbindir}. This is trickier since they would then need to be embedded/referenced in the makefile and other configuration data of the source itself - I could however hardcode a branch of the specfile and source configuration just for FC8. Will look into doing this. You are correct about ownership of /usr/sbin files - there is no need for them to be owned by apache:apache - it was just that way for simplicity. Will change this. I believe that "apache" is a standard user in /etc/passwd (owned by the "setup" rpm) however that is not listed as one of the exceptions for dependencies so I guess "setup" ought to be explicitly listed as a requirement? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151532.m0FFWggK024131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:38:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428779] Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151538.m0FFceZW024956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428779 gouldwp at auburn.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From gouldwp at auburn.edu 2008-01-15 10:38 EST ------- Ralf, Thanks for your above reply/comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:44:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:44:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151544.m0FFiJ1P007776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-15 10:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Thx for your advice Ralf: The killer is this: -- i386/bin/ETL-config 2008-01-15 13:39:03.000000000 +0100 +++ x86_64/bin/ETL-config 2008-01-15 13:38:56.000000000 +0100 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ sysconfdir=/etc sharedstatedir=/usr/com localstatedir=/var -libdir=/usr/lib +libdir=/usr/lib64 infodir=/usr/share/info mandir=/usr/share/man includedir=/usr/include This is a blocker, because it prevent you from installing 386 and the x86_64 packages in parallel. > Actually the only difference between ppc and x86_64 (for example and expect for the pkgconfig path for libdir is: > ---------------- > diff -uNr usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h > --- usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 > +++ usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h 2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100 > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ > > /* Define to 1 if your processor stores words with the most significant byte > first (like Motorola and SPARC, unlike Intel and VAX). */ > -#define WORDS_BIGENDIAN 1 > +/* #undef WORDS_BIGENDIAN */ Bummer. This is yet another blocker. They are exporting a define which clashes with autoconf's autoheaders. This will render this package unusable with any autoconf based package using AC_BIG_ENDIAN (cf. info autoconf) and gcc43. Worse. Your remark had caused me to have a closer look into the headers. They are scattered with autoheader defines which all will trigger the same issue as outlined above. IMO, this package is not in a shape to be added. I recommend to withdraw it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151555.m0FFtk70027974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-15 10:55 EST ------- First of all: ========================================================================= >From spec file - GPLv2+ accessories/marktree.js - MPLv1.1 (not dual with GPL) accessories/mm2oowriter.xsl - GPLv2 (only) accessories/tohtml.xsl - MPLv1.1 (not dual with GPL) accessories/toxhtml.xsl - plugins/latex/Readme.txt GPLv3+ ========================================================================== MPLv1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible (perhaps also GPLv3 incompatible) Also, files under plugins/latex seems GPLv3+. Setting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 15:58:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:58:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151558.m0FFw7SV028211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-15 10:58 EST ------- And it seems GPLv2"only" and GPLv3+ is incompatible -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:01:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 239936] Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151601.m0FG1Q5m029170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: oyranos - The Oyranos Colour Management System (CMS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239936 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:00:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426302] Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151600.m0FG0Fg0028905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: openuniverse - OpenGL space simulator focused on the Solar System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426302 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:00:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151600.m0FG0ouC029057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:02:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 285351] Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151602.m0FG2dIg011472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcalib - Tiny monitor calibration loader for X.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285351 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: xcalib - |Review Request: xcalib - |Tiny monitor calibration |Tiny monitor calibration |loader for X.org Review |loader for X.org |Request: xcalib - Tiny | |monitor calibration loader | |for X.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151613.m0FGDvUN013641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-01-15 11:13 EST ------- > License: GPL+ Should be GPLv2+ as per the COPYING file, no? > - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/packages/RPMS/x86_64/libgweather-2.21.2-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libgweather.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gweather.schemas $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/packages/RPMS/x86_64/libgweather-devel-2.21.2-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm libgweather-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/packages/SRPMS/libgweather-2.21.2-1.fc8.src.rpm $ No problems. The schemas warning is usual. > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. See above. > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Maybe the COPYING should be in the devel as well? > - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ sha1sum libgweather-2.21.2.tar.bz2 480e7789d99e1ed872c757034954da08fdab828f libgweather-2.21.2.tar.bz2 $ sha1sum ../SOURCES/libgweather-2.21.2.tar.bz2 480e7789d99e1ed872c757034954da08fdab828f ../SOURCES/libgweather-2.21.2.tar.bz2 OK. > - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, OK. > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. > - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. OK. > - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK. > - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. > - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). XXX Not pkg-config, but pkgconfig. > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. > - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file N/A. > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. N/A > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. With the exception of the license and pkg-config problem, review is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:20:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428686] Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151620.m0FGKNl2000841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tex-simplecv - latex class for writing curricula vitae https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428686 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2008-01-15 11:20 EST ------- OK, I have created a documentation subpackage. The new release (3) has a new doc subpackage where the documentation is. See http://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151628.m0FGS2X2016585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-15 11:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > License: GPL+ > Should be GPLv2+ as per the COPYING file, no? No, the comments in the source files count, not the COPYING file. And it just says GPL without any version so its GPL+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151633.m0FGXgRH017644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-15 11:33 EST ------- All of the source files just say "GPL", except for one: gweather-gconf.c, which says "GPLv2+". This means that the compiled work is GPLv2+, although, we really should contact upstream and get them to clean up the inconsistency in their code headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151639.m0FGdmqa003490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-15 11:39 EST ------- Rex, you've added a changelog entry mentioning patching the desktop file but you forgot to actually patch it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151649.m0FGnnJl005227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151655.m0FGtpO9006521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 11:55 EST ------- Ok, I'll fix the pkgconfig requires and change the license back -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:56:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151656.m0FGuli4006610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2008-01-15 11:56 EST ------- doh! thx, will fix that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:58:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226422] Merge Review: slrn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151658.m0FGwem4021650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: slrn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226422 ------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com 2008-01-15 11:58 EST ------- Ok, slrn-pull-0.9.8.1pl1-6.20070716cvs.fc9 has %{version}-%{release} in the requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226044] Merge Review: libsepol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151655.m0FGtDJR021261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libsepol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226044 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-15 11:55 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226042] Merge Review: libselinux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151654.m0FGscIm020837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libselinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226042 adel.gadllah at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From adel.gadllah at gmail.com 2008-01-15 11:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > adel you are replacing one command with the same. ... stupid copy and paste sorry; I meant "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 16:57:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151657.m0FGvVlu021581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 11:57 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgweather Short Description: A library for weather information Owners: mclasen at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 394751] Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151705.m0FH5g2G023401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kmplayer - Video plugin for Konqueror and basic Gstreamer/Xine frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=394751 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro 2008-01-15 12:05 EST ------- BTW, I know it is not 100% kosher but in my opinion this minor change is not worth a rebuild. I suggest uploading the corrected spec to CVS and make tag/build only when it's time will come (i.e. more serious modifications / next release / etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:25:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151725.m0FHPOnv011698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2008-01-15 12:25 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple Short Description: Simple interface to Excel data Owners: cweyl Branches: F-7, F-8, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:25:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151725.m0FHPPCt011726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:27:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151727.m0FHRuxG026677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-15 12:27 EST ------- Almost done -- one question about desktop-file-utils, and another about macros. Also, on a system without KDE4 installed, the application menu does not show any icon (khexedit icon is not on the system), and the application itself does not have any icons (presumably because oxygen theme is not installed). MUST Passed: ? rpmlint ? package name ? spec file name ? package guideline-compliant ? license complies with guidelines ? license field accurate ? license file not deleted ? spec in US English ? spec legible ? source matches upstream ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded ? build dependencies complete ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale ? library -> ldconfig ? own all directories ? no dupes in %files ? permission ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT ? Package contains code ? clean buildroot before install ? filenames UTF-8 N/A: ? large docs => -doc ? doc not runtime dependent ? headers in -devel ? static in -static ? if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig ? if libfiles are suffixed, the non-suffixed goes to devel ? devel requires versioned base package Unknown: ? macros used consistently Question: are those _kde4_* macros going to be present for the foreseeable future? FAILED: ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151735.m0FHZos7027944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-15 12:35 EST ------- The _kde4_* macros will be present forever, they allow us to define e.g. _kde4_includedir to %{_includedir}/kde4. For desktop-file-install, unfortunately KDE has always had its own ways of installing .desktop files, we'd have to reinstall the already installed one. :-( It will also lead to the .desktop file landing in a different place as upstream (they use kde4/*.desktop rather than kde4-*.desktop as you get with desktop-file-install --vendor). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:46:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:46:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151746.m0FHkXxS014600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |182235 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-15 12:46 EST ------- Once setting FE-Legal. The license of sendmail doesn't seem to be listed on Fedora's license list. If it is okay, would you add sendmail license to Fedora's license list, spot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 17:52:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151752.m0FHqqKg015804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-15 12:52 EST ------- Actually it turns out it's easy to run desktop-file-install on the installed .desktop file to validate it (thanks to Rex Dieter for clearing that up). This does the trick: desktop-file-install %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde4/okteta.desktop --vendor "" --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/kde4 So I'm fixing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:07:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151807.m0FI7IBM000916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 13:07 EST ------- I updated to 2.21.5.1, but it turned out that it doesn't build. Waiting for a fixes upstream release before attaching a mock-proof spec... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428725] Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151807.m0FI7A10000863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wiggle - help apply patches when 'patch' can't https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428725 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 13:07 EST ------- OK, that gets further but also fails to build due to a missing dependency on the "time" package. Adding that gets things going OK. I still didn't see the proper flags being passed to the compiler, but changing the make line to: make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %{?_smp_mflags} gets that done and fixes the empty debuginfo package as well. You might change "report" to "reports" in %description. There's a COPYING file in the tarball; you need to include that as %doc in your %files list. You should also include ANNOUNCE and TODO; there's no point in including INSTALL ad I'm not sure about DOC/diff.ps. So still a few things to fix before I can approve this package. Checklist: * source files match upstream: 639f8bd48c58b1fa4f24a65bc8aa3e53219e7d48726e63e7c40f0701d1d89b9c wiggle-0.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (one minor typo; no big deal) * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text is in the tarball but not included in the package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires are proper (still needs 'time' to build; assuming it's there so that I can complete this review) X compiler flags are not proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64) (after adding BR: time) * package installs properly X debuginfo package is incomplete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: wiggle = 0.6-2.fc9 = (nothing) * %check is present and all tests pass (after adding BR: time): 50 succeeded and 0 failed * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:27:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225804] Merge Review: glib2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151827.m0FIRHol022473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: glib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225804 bnocera at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2008-01-15 13:27 EST ------- > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/Fedora/glib2/devel/glib2-2.15.2-1.fc9.src.rpm $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/Fedora/glib2/devel/i686/glib2-2.15.2-1.fc9.i686.rpm glib2.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/glib2.csh glib2.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/glib2.sh $ rpmlint /home/hadess/Projects/Fedora/glib2/devel/i686/glib2-static-2.15.2-1.fc9.i686.rpm glib2-static.i686: W: no-documentation $ The few errors are fine. > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. > - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ sha1sum glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 8f2868834deab0ca1e73d647607e2808c2a75a48 glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 $ wget -q -O glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/glib/2.15/glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 $ sha1sum glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 8f2868834deab0ca1e73d647607e2808c2a75a48 glib-2.15.2.tar.bz2 OK. > - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture OK. > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. > - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. > - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. OK. > - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. OK. > - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Not done. I think it makes sense to keep it in devel, as it allows for easy integration in devhelp. > - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. > - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK. > - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK. > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK. > - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK. > - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. > - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK. > - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A. > - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. OK. > - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK. > - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK. > - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK. > - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK. > - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK. > - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. N/A. Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:25:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151825.m0FIPixI003876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org 2008-01-15 13:25 EST ------- Updated: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f9/okteta-0.0.1-0.2.20080115svn761510.fc8.src.rpm - Use desktop-file-install to ensure the .desktop file is valid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:33:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:33:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151833.m0FIXjUC023546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-15 13:33 EST ------- The sendmail license is pending review from the FSF. Accordingly, this package will have to hold as well. I'll see if I can get it bumped to the top of the queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 18:49:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151849.m0FInhrI007615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-15 13:49 EST ------- Yeah, you are going to need to get upstream to resolve these license issues. The MPL 1.1 is not GPLv2 or v3 compatible. Files which are GPLv2 only are not GPLv3 compatible. As is, this package is not OK for Fedora due to license issues. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 19:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244234] Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151914.m0FJEqAx012701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-maanova - Analysis of N-dye Micro Array using mixed model effect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244234 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 14:14 EST ------- Looks like R-qvalue made it all the way through the process, so I can look at this again. But it fails to build: + R CMD INSTALL maanova -l /var/tmp/R-maanova-1.8.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/R/library /var/tmp/R-maanova-1.8.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/R/library * Installing *source* package 'maanova' ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R -I/usr/include/R -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c makeratio.c -o makeratio.o makeratio.c:16:15: error: R.h: No such file or directory makeratio.c:17:19: error: Rmath.h: No such file or directory makeratio.c:18:27: error: R_ext/PrtUtil.h: No such file or directory makeratio.c:19:26: error: R_ext/Applic.h: No such file or directory makeratio.c:20:26: error: R_ext/Random.h: No such file or directory makeratio.c: In function 'makeratio': makeratio.c:31: warning: implicit declaration of function 'R_alloc' makeratio.c:31: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size make: *** [makeratio.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'maanova' ** Removing '/var/tmp/R-maanova-1.8.0-1.fc9-root-mockbuild/usr/lib64/R/library/maanova' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.10911 (%install) I added R-devel to the build dependencies and things build OK. Aside from the usual rpmlint warnings, I get: R-maanova.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib64/R/library/maanova/doc/abf1.tex I'm not really sure it's worth fixing, but if you want to do so it should be trivial. I can't fetch the upstream source; the Souce0: URL is 404 for me. I guess they've moved on to 1.9.0 now. Should I just go ahead and review this or would you like to update again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 19:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226639] Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151936.m0FJapDl016832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: xorg-x11-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226639 Bug 226639 depends on bug 317641, which changed state. Bug 317641 Summary: xorg-x11 fonts with bad licenses need to be fixed or removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=317641 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 19:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:41:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151941.m0FJf5cj003114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 14:41 EST ------- Updated spec and srpm here: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-settings-daemon.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-settings-daemon-2.21.5.2-1.src.rpm These build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 19:38:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 252950] Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801151938.m0FJclSh002492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: othello - Classic board game with ai plugins and network support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252950 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2008-01-15 14:38 EST ------- Just a reminder: You cannot use the othello trademark without permission. Either remove the "Othello" mark from all user visible locations, or drop this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:14:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:14:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152014.m0FKE2mS023406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 15:14 EST ------- rpmlint output: [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/gnome-settings-daemon-2.21.5.2-1.fc9.i386.rpm gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_font_rendering.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_screensaver.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-settings-daemon.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_keybindings.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_default_editor.schemas [mclasen at localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/gnome-settings-daemon-*.rpm gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_font_rendering.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_screensaver.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-settings-daemon.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_keybindings.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/apps_gnome_settings_daemon_default_editor.schemas gnome-settings-daemon.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 37, tab: line 1) gnome-settings-daemon-devel.i386: W: no-documentation I'll fix the spaces/tabs thing, the rest are ignorable package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file readable: yes upstream sources: ok buildable: yes excludearch: n/a buildrequires: ok locale handling: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: need to own /usr/include/gnome-settings-daemon-2.0 %file list: ok permissions: need to add %defattr to devel file list %clean: ok macro use: consistent content: code large docs: n/a %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: ok libraries: n/a devel deps: ok .la files: n/a gui app: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250943] Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152016.m0FKGjDD024120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250943 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ovasik at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2008-01-15 15:16 EST ------- (just adding myself to CC as because of future xmlto X3D support) One thing I see is missing Requires(post,postun) for libxml2 (usage of /usr/bin/xmlcatalog) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:33:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:33:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238379] Package review: emesene In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152033.m0FKXcHj026759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Package review: emesene Alias: emesene https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238379 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 15:33 EST ------- FYI, Monday was the 14th, not the 16th. I'm removing the NEEDSPONSOR blocker because you already have cvsextras access. Because you have "%{appdir}" in your files list, it recursively includes everything below it, which means that everything else you explicitly include under %{appdir} is a duplicate. You should use %dir %{apprdir} instead, which includes the directory but doesn't automatically pull in everything beneath it. This reveals some other issues: You list %{podir}/sv twice You don't include any of the files which live directly under %{appdir} A COPYING file is installed into %{appdir}. I guess it's not a big problem but you already included a copy as %doc. My recommendation for the %files list: The %doc and %lang stuff you already have (minus the duplicate sv directory) %dir %{appdir} %dir %{podir} %{appdir}/[A-Za-oq-z]* %{appdir}/plugins_base %{_bindir}/emesene %{menudir}/emesene.desktop %{icondir}/emesene.png This gets us down to the following three rpmlint complaints: emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/desktop.py 0644 emesene.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/emesene/Controller.py 0644 Honestly I don't really have an issue either way, but according to comment 26 you should chmod 0755 Controller.py. emesene.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized instant messaging client for Windows Live Messenger (tm) network An easy fix. Almost done! Since I'm now reviewing a completely different package from the one I started out reviewing, I'll run through my checklist again: * source files match upstream: 89cbfc144393d5e7aa6766cd429d70891379234c212f477531c1a67ef17dd803 emesene-r806.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary is OK (except for capitalization issue) * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: emesene = 0.99-1.fc9 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env gnome-python2-extras gtk2 python * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I installed this package and went through the menus and such; everything seemed to work fine, although I have no instant messaging accounts to log into. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X many duplicates in %files. X file permissions need a tweak (Controller.py according to upstream). * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * desktop file installed properly and without desktop-file-install complaints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:50:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152050.m0FKotVb029917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 15:50 EST ------- All fixed in http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-settings-daemon.spec http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gnome-settings-daemon-2.21.5.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152053.m0FKrxKD016296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 15:53 EST ------- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250943] Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152056.m0FKueCW030921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x3d-xsl - Web3D Consortium stylesheets for X3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250943 ------- Additional Comments From braden at endoframe.com 2008-01-15 15:56 EST ------- Thanks; and sorry for the delay following up on this. I'll have updated packages for x3d-dtd-schema (bug 251282) available soon; and I'll follow up with updates to this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 20:58:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152058.m0FKwIUZ017023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 15:58 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-settings-daemon Short Description: A daemon to share settings from GNOME to other applications Owners: bnocera at redhat.com Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:16:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226539] Merge Review: which In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152116.m0FLGw2F002187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: which https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226539 ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:15:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152115.m0FLFCSe001976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mitr at redhat.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:29:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 281281] Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152129.m0FLTQTs022646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: netpipe - A network performance measurement tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281281 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide ruben at rubenkerkhof.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |201449 nThis| | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From ruben at rubenkerkhof.com 2008-01-15 16:29 EST ------- Hmm, upstream seems to be less active than I thought. I haven't received a reply from them, nor could I subscribe to the mailing list. Getting this package in Fedora is probably not a good idea, so I'll close the ticket. Thanks for the effort Till. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:36:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152136.m0FLaauW006074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 16:36 EST ------- The spec link seems to be invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428777] Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152141.m0FLfDwV006984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428777 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152140.m0FLex01006840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 16:40 EST ------- I'll take a look at your packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:41:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152141.m0FLfPWl007052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428894] New: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt at rudeserver.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudesocket/rudesocket.spec SRPM URL: http://homeless.fedorapeople.org/rudesocket/rudesocket-1.1.0-3.src.rpm Description: rudecgi provides client socket services to an application. In addition to normal and SSL TCP connections, it supports proxies, SOCK4 and SOCKS5 servers that you can chain together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 21:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 241476] Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152150.m0FLoLGI026613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pxp - Validating XML parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241476 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-15 16:50 EST ------- Build failed on rawhide. Some packages are missing on this one : --------------------------------- DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml-ulex-devel DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml-findlib-devel DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml-ocamldoc DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml-ocamlnet-devel DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml -------------------------------- And on f-8, this following is missing : -------------------------------- DEBUG util.py:261: No Package Found for ocaml-ocamlnet-devel -------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:00:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426492] Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152200.m0FM056P028036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jabbin - Instant messaging and VoIP Jabber client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426492 ------- Additional Comments From kurzawax at gmail.com 2008-01-15 17:00 EST ------- Sorry, but I have got problem with my Fedora and I will try to repair this for a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 304391] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152206.m0FM6X4m029359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - xFire protocol plug-in for Pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304391 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:07:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427738] Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152207.m0FM7Zt5012526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dropbear - SSH2 server and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427738 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 414791] Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152204.m0FM4nQD011670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414791 ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-01-15 17:04 EST ------- Oh geez, didn't notice you had approved it until now. Sure, I'll add you as co-maintainer once the packages are in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314911] Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152206.m0FM6sAX012300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuncfg - Userspace TUN/TAP configuration utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314911 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365931] Review Request: getmail - POP3, IMAP4 and SDPS mail retriever with Maildir delivery In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152207.m0FM7L3m012425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: getmail - POP3, IMAP4 and SDPS mail retriever with Maildir delivery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365931 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152205.m0FM5tgT012096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:07:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 321351] Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152207.m0FM76xj012363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: vdr-skinsoppalusikka - The "Soppalusikka" skin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=321351 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:07:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428779] Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152207.m0FM7xtO029658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Storable - Storable perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428779 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247983] Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152211.m0FMBQtw030386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247984] Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152211.m0FMBOF2030337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Etoys - Squeak-based learning environment for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247984 bugzilla at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841, 182235 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841, 182235 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:07:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 414791] Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152207.m0FM7urL029629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414791 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-01-15 17:07 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: evolution-zimbra Short Description: Allows Evolution to connect to the Zimbra Collaboration Suite Owners: mbarnes at redhat.com,mmahut at redhat.com Branches: FC-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:11:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427955] Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152211.m0FMBn4s013548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome2-globalmenu-applet - Menu Server panel applet for gtk2-aqd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427955 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|177841 | OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427669] Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152219.m0FMJNAa031347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-nds-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for Nintendo DS ROM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427669 ------- Additional Comments From jbowes at redhat.com 2008-01-15 17:19 EST ------- Hi Erik, thanks for taking a look Updated: Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/gnome-nds-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/tmp/gnome-nds-thumbnailer-1.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Conclusion: > > - License tag needs to be changed to GPLv2+ > - BuildRequires: GConf2 needs to be added I've updated these. > - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT needs to be changed to %{buildroot} IIRC, the guidelines state that neither is better than the other, so long as one is used consistantly, so i've left it as RPM_BUILD_ROOT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:20:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 217197] Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152220.m0FMKAnI014859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: MyBashBurn - burn data and songs. Alias: MyBashBurn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217197 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 17:20 EST ------- It seems to me that the tarball in the srpm is not the same as the upstream tarball. Looking at the MyBashBurn.sh file, it's clear that the license should be GPLv2+ as they allow "any later version". I believe those are the only issues remaining. To refresh my memory, let me run through my checklist again: X source files do not match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. description is OK. dist tag is present. build root is OK. X license field matches the actual license (should be GPLv2+) * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none) * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mybashburn = 1.0.2-3.fc9 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/env cdda2wav cdrdao cdrecord coreutils dialog >= 1.0 dvd+rw-tools eject flac mkisofs vorbis-tools * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I did some light testing (over the network so I didn't actually try to burn anything) and it seems to work OK. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:23:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152223.m0FMNHs3015154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-01-15 17:23 EST ------- * rpmlint output: > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/scheduler.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/actions.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/__init__.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/i18n.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/output.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/__init__.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/tuierrors.py 0644 > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/errors.py 0644 Need fixing (by removing the #!... line) > sectool.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/scheduler/selftest.py 0644 Needs fixing (make it executable, or don't ship it) > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/netserv.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/home_dirs.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/selftest.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/disc_usage.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/suid.py 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/sectool.py 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/path.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/home_files.sh 0744 > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/passwd.sh 0744 Need fixing - use 0755 > sectool.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/sectool /usr/share/sectool/sectool.py Fixing this is not quite necessary IMHO, but it can't hurt. > sectool.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/tests/python_defs.py 0744 Needs fixing - use 0644 > sectool.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0 0.1.0-1.fc8 Use "0.1.0-1" in the %changelog version number > sectool.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm > sectool.noarch: W: bogus-variable-use-in-%post $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Definitely needs fixing: * $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is no longer relevant in %post * Why does that script remove the .py[co] files anyway? > sectool-gui.noarch: W: no-documentation OK > sectool-gui.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /etc/security/console.apps/sectool-gui > sectool-gui.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /etc/pam.d/sectool-gui These files should not be executable. > sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/guiOutput.py 0644 > sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sectool/guiRender.py 0644 Remove the #!... line. > sectool-gui.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/sectool/sectool-gui.py 0744 Use 0755 > sectool-gui.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode Needs fixing > sectool-gui.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description extention extension Needs fixing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428894] Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152227.m0FMRTMZ032583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rudesocket - Library (C++ API) for creating client sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428894 matt at rudeserver.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: rudesocket -|Review Request: rudesocket - |Library (C++ API) for |Library (C++ API) for |creating client sockets |creating client sockets ------- Additional Comments From matt at rudeserver.com 2008-01-15 17:27 EST ------- Updated Description: rudesocket provides client socket services to an application. In addition to normal and SSL TCP connections, it supports proxies, SOCK4 and SOCKS5 servers that you can chain together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 417111] Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152232.m0FMW5im000761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: youtube-dl - Download videos from YouTube.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417111 lxtnow at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow at gmail.com 2008-01-15 17:32 EST ------- yep, do you have a comment on this package mamoru ? Krzysztof, follow this procedure : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR block, i'll sponsor him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152241.m0FMfJe5002394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2008-01-15 17:41 EST ------- Unless I am wrong, in your patch you also obsolete every previous release of xdvi, although we agreed to obsolete only the version that went into rawhide... Is it on purpose? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:51:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152251.m0FMpTqm003883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 17:51 EST ------- R-qvalue-1.12.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-qvalue' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152254.m0FMs0I3004455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 17:53 EST ------- R-multtest-1.18.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152257.m0FMvU3H005553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 17:57 EST ------- kitsune-2.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kitsune' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:54:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152254.m0FMs1EJ004480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.18.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:54:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:54:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152254.m0FMsL7n004572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 17:54 EST ------- qmmp-0.1.5-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qmmp' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 22:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428332] Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152259.m0FMx27p006253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: halevt - Generic handler for HAL events https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428332 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 17:59 EST ------- halevt-0.0.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update halevt' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:01:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427624] Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152301.m0FN1lVh007243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-qvalue - Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427624 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:01 EST ------- R-qvalue-1.12.0-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-qvalue' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:00:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:00:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152300.m0FN05mr006725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2008-01-15 18:00 EST ------- * The source0: URL does not point to the tarball, the real URL is https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/sectool/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/sectool-0.1.0.tar.bz2?format=raw Perhaps use only "%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2" and put the full URL in a comment. FIXME: source0: content in this case * The uploaded tarball does not match the tarball in src.rpm!! * License: GPL+ is probably correct, but do you _want_ it to be GPL+? (RH copyright guidelines say something else) * ExclusiveOS: useless, just drop it * Two source0 lines! * sectool-gui should probably Requires: sectool = %{version}-%{release} * Requires: gtk2 - You probably want pygtk2. * desktop file: "HardwareSettings" isn't true * Drop the (cat %{name}.lang) * Add "%doc README: * Use one of the recommended BuildRoot: values * sectool.desktop should be shipped in sectool-gui * sectool.desktop: Remove .png from Icon= * Add --vendor=fedora to desktop-file-install * A %defattr directive is missing in %files gui * URL: perhaps use https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/sectool/wiki/WikiStart to avoid a certificate mismatch warning * Consider using macros for paths; at least you can (make PREFIX=%{_prefix} ...and so on for other variables), perhaps add more variables to the Makefile to remove other hard-coded directory paths like /etc, /usr/bin and /var/lib/sectool and /usr/share * Can you use (make %{?_smp_mflags}) ? * %description: s/inerface/interface * %description gui: To me this reads like "sectool provides a GUI"; perhaps just "sectool-gui provides a GTK-based graphical user interface to sectool."? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:04:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152304.m0FN4PpO023533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:04 EST ------- cppad-20071229-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409011] Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152301.m0FN1cY4022977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409011 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:01 EST ------- pam_fprint-0.2-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 409011] Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152303.m0FN3YIP023265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_fprint - Integrate libfprint with existing applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409011 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:03 EST ------- pam_fprint-0.2-2.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:05:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152305.m0FN5o9v008423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:05 EST ------- R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2-1.2.0-5 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152304.m0FN4RhA007736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |20071229-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248677] Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152305.m0FN5pi8008456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 - BSgenome.Celegans.UCSC.ce2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248677 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152309.m0FN9MAD024589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:09 EST ------- kitsune-2.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kitsune' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:10:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:10:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240497] Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152310.m0FNA7P8009614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-multtest 1.18.0 - Resampling-based multiple hypothesis testing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240497 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:10 EST ------- R-multtest-1.18.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:11:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152311.m0FNBHJo009857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:11 EST ------- python-xlrd-0.6.1-5.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:12:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152312.m0FNCCQf010177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:12 EST ------- qmmp-0.1.5-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qmmp' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:12:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 416761] Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152312.m0FNCuiK025751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:12 EST ------- cppad-20071229-6.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:11:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152311.m0FNBIjv025347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 updates at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Fixed In Version| |0.6.1-5.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243955] Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152313.m0FNDAPR010923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-xlrd - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel (tm) spreadsheet files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243955 ------- Additional Comments From updates at fedoraproject.org 2008-01-15 18:13 EST ------- python-xlrd-0.6.1-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:46:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:46:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152346.m0FNkefI015580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 ------- Additional Comments From ismael at olea.org 2008-01-15 18:46 EST ------- spec link fixed, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:48:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152348.m0FNmY9L015806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 18:48 EST ------- OK, this one fails to build due to a missing dependency on perl(Test::More). Adding that gets a bit further, then: t/prereq.... Net-SNMP not found. Net-SNMP installs the perl modules [...] Plus there's nice insult to "Redhat" (whatever that is) in the output. Adding another build dependency on perl(Net::SNMP) still results in the same error. On a lark I added a build dependency on net-snmp and that didn't work. However, a dependency on perl(SNMP) did. Please be kind to your reviewer and try make sure that your packages build properly. I know that's hard to do because you can't do scratch builds in koji until you're sponsored, but you can still install mock to do proper build testing on a minimal system. After getting a clean build, rpmlint has the following to say: perl-SNMP-Info.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-SNMP-Info-1.04/README perl-SNMP-Info.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/man3/SNMP::Info.3pm.gz These can be fixed by calling iconv; see the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues page for an example. Finally, the test suite says: Make sure you download and install the MIBS needed for SNMP::Info. See Man page or perldoc for SNMP::Info. and I wonder if there's anything extra that needs to be added. Checklist: * source files match upstream: 1e23225ee98205b36dc58fa45548a0b99ea795003d8cc002c27506e072bf3592 SNMP-Info-1.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. X BuildRequires missing perl(Test::More) perl(SNMP). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64) (after adding missing build deps) * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(SNMP::Info) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Airespace) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Bridge) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CDP) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoImage) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoQOS) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoRTT) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoStack) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoStats) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoVTP) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Entity) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::EtherLike) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::FDP) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1::Allied) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1::Asante) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1::Bayhub) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1::S3000) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Aironet) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Allied) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Aruba) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Baystack) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::C1900) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::C2900) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Catalyst) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Centillion) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Cisco) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Foundry) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::HP) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::N2270) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::NAP222x) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Orinoco) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::ZyXEL_DSLAM) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Aironet) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::AlteonAD) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::BayRS) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::C3550) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::C4000) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::C6500) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Cisco) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Contivity) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Extreme) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Foundry) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Juniper) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::N1600) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3::Passport) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::MAU) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::NortelStack) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::RapidCity) = 1.04 perl(SNMP::Info::SONMP) = 1.04 perl-SNMP-Info = 1.04-1.fc9 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Math::BigInt) perl(SNMP) perl(SNMP::Info) perl(SNMP::Info::Airespace) perl(SNMP::Info::Bridge) perl(SNMP::Info::CDP) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoImage) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoQOS) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoRTT) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoStack) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoStats) perl(SNMP::Info::CiscoVTP) perl(SNMP::Info::Entity) perl(SNMP::Info::EtherLike) perl(SNMP::Info::FDP) perl(SNMP::Info::Layer1) perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2) perl(SNMP::Info::Layer3) perl(SNMP::Info::MAU) perl(SNMP::Info::NortelStack) perl(SNMP::Info::RapidCity) perl(SNMP::Info::SONMP) perl(strict) perl(vars) %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.03 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:52:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152352.m0FNqZGB031492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-15 18:52 EST ------- Actually, we also still have a broken upgrade path as well: # yum --nogpgcheck localinstall xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm Loading "dellsysidplugin" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Setting up Local Package Process Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: rpm.livna.org * dell-software: linux.dell.com * fedora: ftp.linux.org.uk * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com * fwupdate: linux.dell.com * updates: ftp.linux.org.uk Examining xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm: xdvik - 22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64 Marking xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package tetex-xdvi.x86_64 0:3.0-44.3.fc8 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: tetex-xdvi x86_64 3.0-44.3.fc8 updates 906 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 906 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/1): tetex-xdvi-3.0-44. 100% |=========================| 906 kB 00:07 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/pxdvi-xaw3d.bin from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/bin/pxdvizilla from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/bin/xdvi-xaw3d.bin from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/bin/xdvizilla from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/applications/tetex-xdvi.desktop from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/man/man1/xdvi.1.gz from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/texmf/pxdvi/vfontmap from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 file /usr/share/texmf/pxdvi/vfontmap.sample from install of tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package xdvi-22.84.12-5.fc9.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- It seems the obsoloetes for tetex-xdvi are not working, for reasons that I don't understand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 15 23:54:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:54:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801152354.m0FNsKBK016498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-15 18:54 EST ------- Ah, ok, ignore that, I had accidentally disabled the development repo, and had the F8 repo enabled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 00:06:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:06:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428777] Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160006.m0G06ajp018916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428777 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 19:06 EST ------- This one build OK; rpmlint says: perl-Net-NBName.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-NBName-0.26/README perl-Net-NBName.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-NBName-0.26/Changes perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/nodescan.pl perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/nodestat.pl perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/bin/namequery.pl All of these can be fixed with a quick pass through sed; see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/nodescan.pl perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/nodestat.pl perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/namequery.pl These scripts are executable, but the first line of each doesn't contain the '#!' line that would enable the kernel to know how to run them. As a result these scripts do nothing except spew shell errors. You will need to add #!/usr/bin/perl to each. Checklist: * source files match upstream: 947cf41234f88779086f851748a86b04bf6f851f0d84b8950c8e3fbdbf20cd2e Net-NBName-0.26.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly X rpmlint has valid complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Net::NBName) = 0.26 perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery) = 0.26 perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery::RR) = 0.26 perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus) = 0.26 perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus::RR) = 0.26 perl(Net::NBName::Request) perl-Net-NBName = 0.26-1.fc9 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery) perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery::RR) perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus) perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus::RR) perl(Socket) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=23, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 00:04:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427667] Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160004.m0G04lps001026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com 2008-01-15 19:04 EST ------- yum --nogpgcheck --enablerepo=development localinstall xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm Loading "dellsysidplugin" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * livna: rpm.livna.org * dell-software: linux.dell.com * fedora: ftp.linux.org.uk * adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com * development: ftp.heanet.ie * fwupdate: linux.dell.com * updates: ftp.linux.org.uk Setting up Local Package Process Examining xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm: xdvik - 22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64 Marking xdvik-22.84.13-6.fc9.x86_64.rpm to be installed Package xdvi - 22.84.12-9.fc9.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do So, we still aren't obsoleting the old version of xdvi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 00:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160032.m0G0WJpL022305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 19:32 EST ------- This one build OK and rpmlint is silent. I find it odd that there's no %check section even though there are tests. Did you remove it, or did cpanspec not include it for some reason? I added %check ./Build test verbose=1 and dependencies on perl(File::Find::Rule) and perl(Test::Pod) and the tests failed: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/01-basic.t 1 256 12 1 8.33% 11 t/03-multi.t 1 256 7 1 14.29% 4 Failed 2/3 test scripts, 33.33% okay. 2/21 subtests failed, 90.48% okay. You should investigate why these tests are failing and try to understand the impact of the failures. I looked at the CPAN testing report and see that other testers have seen the same test failures. Checklist: * source files match upstream: 30b0e6acb71ec790a8adbbec065f96093a7537233fb8c401491ac2e86df4484c MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession) = 0.30 perl(MasonX::Request::WithMultiSession) perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession = 0.30-1.fc9 = perl >= 0:5.005 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Apache::Session::Wrapper) >= 0.13 perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(HTML::Mason) >= 1.16 perl(HTML::Mason::Exceptions) perl(HTML::Mason::Request) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) X %check is not present even though a test suite is in the tarball. You need to run upstream test suites whenever possible. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 00:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:45:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428916] New: Review Request: gimp-liquidrescale - Gimp plug-in for content-aware resizing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428916 Summary: Review Request: gimp-liquidrescale - Gimp plug-in for content-aware resizing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ewan at macmahon.me.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SPECS/gimp-liquidrescale.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macmahon.me.uk/linux/fedora/SRPMS/gimp-liquidrescale-0.3.0.6-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Liquid Rescale GIMP plugin is an implementation of a 'seam carving' algorithm. It aims at resizing pictures non uniformly while preserving their features, i.e. avoiding distortion of the important parts. It supports manual feature selection, and can also be used to remove portions of the picture in a consistent way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 00:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 314871] Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160057.m0G0vU2L008436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gimp-lqr-plugin - GIMP LiquidRescale Plug-In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314871 ewan at macmahon.me.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ewan at macmahon.me.uk ------- Additional Comments From ewan at macmahon.me.uk 2008-01-15 19:57 EST ------- I've had a completely independent (and slightly different) package of this plugin sat around for a while pending some tidy ups. I've got it into a presentable state and submitted a review request as bug #428916; if the OP of this package doesn't reappear it may be worth considering that as an alternative. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 01:07:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:07:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160107.m0G17epY027562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com 2008-01-15 20:07 EST ------- Well Ralf raise a real problem... And i would give a chance to have an answear from upstream...But indeed, I won't approve anything that isn't gcc43 compliant. There is also the question to add some headers without any libs... I wonder if this make sense, specially if only one package use it. Does theses headers could be merged with another package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 01:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428549] Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160132.m0G1Wn1m013807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 tibbs at math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 20:32 EST ------- Interesting that this build for Geoff, because it doesn't build for me. Geoff, did you do a mock build? Against which version of Fedora did you build? In mock, building against current rawhide repositories, I get: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 28, in from tracmtn import __version__ as VERSION File "/builddir/build/BUILD/TracMonotone-0.0.12/tracmtn/__init__.py", line 6, in import backend File "/builddir/build/BUILD/TracMonotone-0.0.12/tracmtn/backend.py", line 28, in from trac.versioncontrol.api import Repository, Node, Changeset, \ ImportError: No module named trac.versioncontrol.api error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54163 (%build) I added a build-time depenency on trac and the package builds. I'll concurr with Geoff about the non-executable-script rpmlint complaints. Python programmers do this for some unknown reason and I'm long past blocking packages because of it. Wow, this is significantly broken; you can't even use setup.py to create the tarball without having trac installed. Really suboptimal. I did the checkout as instructed in the spec and the content I get differs. I think it's important to specify a date or a tag or whatever monotone supports to ensure that we can get a consistent checkout in the absense of an actual release tarball. On the plus side, it looks like many of the shebang lines are gone in the checkout I made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:30:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] New: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at lovesunix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review at redhat.com,notting at redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/bongo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lovesunix.net/fedora/bongo-0.2.93-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Bongo is an easy-to-use mail and calendar system, offering a simple yet powerful user interface. The goal is to make sharing, organization, and communication simpler, quicker, and more useful. Note: This still needs to be grokked to build against system libical and clucene (x86_64 bug - supposedly fixed in SVN, will investigate possibility of patching). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:30:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428925] Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160230.m0G2UXwp022123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bongo - An easy-to-use mail and calendar system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428925 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160230.m0G2UW0K022095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 david at lovesunix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |428925 nThis| | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at lovesunix.net Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net 2008-01-15 21:30 EST ------- This would make my in progress bongo spec a bit nicer so I'll take the review. I successfully built this in mock (fedora-devel-x86_64) However rpmlint complains: libical.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libical.so libical.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libicalss.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 414791] Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160240.m0G2edtt008636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414791 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 21:40 EST ------- Please use fedora account names in the Owners field. I assume you mean F-8, as there is no FC-8? :) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:44:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428493] Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160244.m0G2idUH008865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-Simple - Simple interface to Excel data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428493 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 21:44 EST ------- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428739] libgweather - A library for weather information In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160248.m0G2m3RC009628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: libgweather - A library for weather information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428739 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 21:48 EST ------- please use fedora account system names for the Owners field. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226158] Merge Review: mono In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160301.m0G31rC3012242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226158 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 22:01 EST ------- Paul: Sorry, I didn't see you in the request. Can you use the pkgdb web interface to request it, or put another cvs request here if you prefer a cvsadmin to do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160259.m0G2xFjv011412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 21:59 EST ------- Humm... this review looks very strange. No comments at all from the submitter, and the reviewer fixing and approving the package. Bastien: are you going to maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 02:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427479] Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160258.m0G2wWxh011352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-ParseLex - Perl lexical analyzer. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427479 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-15 21:58 EST ------- Some additional comments: This package doesn't build in mock against rawhide; it is missing a build dependency on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker). The tarball includes a test suite, but the spec doesn't call it. And unfortunately, when I add a check section to call it, test4 fails. I think the test is has simply been broken by some perl update over the past nine years; the difference in the tests is: < can't analyze: "this is an invalid string with a "" in it"" at examples/ctokenizer.pl line 17, line 4. --- > can't analyze: "this is an invalid string with a "" in it"" at examples/ctokenizer.pl line 17, chunk 4. So s/chunk/line/ in the expected data from the test and it should pass. rpmlint says the following: perl-ParseLex.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-ParseLex-2.15/Changes This should be passed through iconv; see the example in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues perl-ParseLex.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(Parse::Token) This is more interesting; rpm extracts the following two dependencies (in addition to several others, of course): perl(Parse::Token) perl(Parse::Token) = 2.15 This comes from the "package Parse::Token;" lines in Token.pm and Token-t.pm. Unfortunately rpm screws up sometimes and these errant dependencies need to be filtered. If you were using cpanspec to generate your specfile then this comes for free with --filter-provides but since you've rolled your own, take a look at the examples at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:07:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226093] Merge Review: libXv In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160307.m0G37ANm027512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXv https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226093 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXv-1.0.3-4.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:09:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:09:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226091] Merge Review: libXtst In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160309.m0G39Gh5027742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXtst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226091 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXtst-1.0.3-2.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:10:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226090] Merge Review: libXt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160310.m0G3AJWg028236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226090 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXt-1.0.4-4.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160315.m0G3FJV4014768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-15 22:15 EST ------- looks good and is clean approved. builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226076] Merge Review: libXi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160316.m0G3GOvY029267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226076 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXi-1.1.3-3.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 22:16 EST ------- Thanks to bpepple for correcting pkgconfig. As package build with above fixes. CLOSING. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226070] Merge Review: libXext In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160318.m0G3ILo4015254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libXext https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226070 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |libXext-1.0.1-5.fc9 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160322.m0G3MbTx016034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-admin-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2008-01-15 22:22 EST ------- source does not match upstream [dennis at bratac ~]$ sha1sum fedora-admin-console-1.1.1.tar.bz2 36fd62edfcba7838ff7e066046147a8f5d032376 fedora-admin-console-1.1.1.tar.bz2 [dennis at bratac ~]$ sha1sum fedora/SOURCES/fedora-admin-console-1.1.1.tar.bz2 a7c8d5fdf4406a107227cddc18e04931a8e6de56 fedora/SOURCES/fedora-admin-a7c8d5fdf4406a107227cddc18e04931a8e6de56 fedora/SOURCES/fedora-admin-console-1.1.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160331.m0G3ViVA032195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-15 22:31 EST ------- sectool seems to be a fairly popular name for a tool, judging by google. Not that I have a better one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428823] Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160334.m0G3Ym4m032419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sectool - A security audit system and intrusion detection system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428823 ------- Additional Comments From notting at redhat.com 2008-01-15 22:34 EST ------- For example, http://sectool.sourceforge.net/, http://sectool-db.sourceforge.net/, https://sectool.dev.java.net/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428549] Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160349.m0G3nbO7020571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac-monotone-plugin - Monotone version control plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428549 ------- Additional Comments From geoff at programmer-monk.net 2008-01-15 22:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Interesting that this build for Geoff, because it doesn't build for me. Geoff, > did you do a mock build? Against which version of Fedora did you build? I thought it was clear from my comment but I guess not. It did not build for me in mock, but it did build outside of mock since I already had trac installed. I probably should have pasted the failure from mock. All part of the learning experience. > Wow, this is significantly broken; you can't even use setup.py to create the > tarball without having trac installed. Really suboptimal. It seems that they import the main module in setup.py so they only have to specify the version number in one place. I can see why this is attractive but I would think there is a less irritating way to do it. > I did the checkout as instructed in the spec and the content I get differs. I > think it's important to specify a date or a tag or whatever monotone supports to > ensure that we can get a consistent checkout in the absense of an actual release > tarball. I really don't understand why upstream doesn't seem to have tagged any revisions, bizarre. > On the plus side, it looks like many of the shebang lines are gone in the > checkout I made. Well that's one good thing I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427185] Review Request: okteta - Binary editor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160353.m0G3rAqc003196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: okteta - Binary editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427185 michel.sylvan at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan at gmail.com 2008-01-15 22:53 EST ------- Changes look fine - APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:54:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160354.m0G3s4wC003266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: iputils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 22:54 EST ------- 1)You need to add following as you are calling service from %preun Requires(preun): /sbin/service 2) Please add macros. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Still I can see SPEC have following lines which does not follow macros install -cp rdisc ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/sbin/ install -cp ping6 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/bin/ install -cp tracepath ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/bin/ install -cp tracepath6 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/bin/ Also, No macro uses in %files. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 03:59:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428364] Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160359.m0G3xHun022139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-admin-console: Fedora Directory Administration Server Management Console Alias: fedora-admin-console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428364 yaneti at declera.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com ------- Additional Comments From yaneti at declera.com 2008-01-15 22:59 EST ------- IMHO fedora-admin-console is a little too grand a name. fedora-ds-admin-console ? Same goes for the other too generally named packages at directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:02:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226422] Merge Review: slrn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160402.m0G42Aaj023047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: slrn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226422 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 23:02 EST ------- Packaging looks ok now. rpmlint gave me slrn.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/slrn-0.9.8.1pl1/changes.txt The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). ==> This must be fixed. You can do this in next release. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/slrnpull 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/slrnpull Your logrotate file should be named /etc/logrotate.d/. slrn-pull.i386: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/slrnpull news 02750 The file is setgid. Usually this is a packaging bug. If this is a game, then, you should use the proper rpm group, or location. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/slrnpull 02750 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/slrnpull 02750 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. slrn-pull.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/slrnpull/out.going 03777 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. ==> are those needed for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:03:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:03:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225992] Merge Review: libcap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160403.m0G43bDJ023446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: libcap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225992 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 23:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > You're right, the '%post -p' syntax will get parsed by find-requires and it > isn't necessary to add that requirement manually (although it doesn't do any > harm either) Ok. But I still want you to remove it next time you build this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160418.m0G4Iq02007536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 23:18 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=291797) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=291797&action=view) patch for spec Here's the patch. Let me know what you think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:22:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226318] Merge Review: procmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160422.m0G4MXPa026256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: procmail https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226318 panemade at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 414791] Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160421.m0G4LYmY026204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-zimbra - An Evolution extension for the Zimbra Collaboration Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=414791 mbarnes at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes at redhat.com 2008-01-15 23:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I assume you mean F-8, as there is no FC-8? :) Yes, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225292] Merge Review: audit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160417.m0G4Hvrf025560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: audit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225292 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 23:17 EST ------- >BTW, I use essentially the same spec file for upstream, RHEL, and Fedora. I >don't like making changes for one that affects another since the audit system is >under heavy development. If it were an older stable package, I wouldn't care so >much. Totally understood. >#1 fixed, Thanks. Looks good. >#2 fixed but I like the shorter version better...why else have an url? The Source url can be very different from the URL field. Tools like spectool -g and so forth look for the Source at a absolute URL. So, it's best to specify the entire thing. >#3 its a reminder to get it working at some point - added a comment, ok, sounds good. >#4 sometimes people like to make a utility that runs early or from busybox. I'd >rather delete it in a few more weeks. ok. Possibly you could split them out into a -static subpackage? >#5 it already was that way, Doese't seem to be. It's not a big deal, but doing the %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig means it just calls ldconfig, where if it's not using the -p it will spawn a shell and pass the contents (ldconfig) to it. Just a fork of a bash different I guess. >#6 will look into it another day, patches are welcome, Ok. Will attach a patch here. >#7 that was put there because it was required. > There was a bz opened that this was the fix for so I can't get rid of it, Odd. Do you know the bug number? The guidelines forbid this now: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=(prereq)#head-c81b037a3a0d08f98eb9cb50594f5de73d1e461d >#8 a) af_unix must be that way due to a mistake that must be overwritten. >I'll change that another time. ok. Might also make a note in the spec about it in case someone wonders. > b) coreutils has to be there. coreutils is in the base buildroot, and will always be there. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions > c) I don't know a better way to do this patches welcome > please test on x86_64, though. Yeah, I guess the python bits are arch independent, but the package is arch, so it complains. Nothing I can think of to do unless the python audit bits split out into their own noarch package. ;( > d) logrotate is the enemy of audit. Audit must do its own rotation for security >purposes. Hum. I guess that makes some sense. > e) those upgrade commands are for audit 1.0.x systems. Yeah, and we should keep supporting the last 3 releases for upgrades. If audit1.0.x is newer than that, keep it. > f) where is this done in the spec file? I don't see any > symlinking of consolehelper. Then again, consolehelper had better > be in /usr/bin and not some relative directory. It's not in the spec, it's part of the 'make install', ie upstream. /usr/libexec/system-config-audit-server -> /usr/bin/consolehelper >audit-1.6.5-3 has the changes from this review in it. When you see if finish >going through koji successfully, please feel free to look it over. Excellent. Thanks for the quick response here... Will attach a patch for items 5, 6, 7... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:24:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:24:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225611] Merge Review: bc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160424.m0G4O9bb026476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225611 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 23:24 EST ------- Patrice, Please feel free to review this officially as I got involved with some other reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160439.m0G4d1Vj010601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-15 23:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #69) > Rrepackage everything before considering a new name is onerous and could quickly Repackaging ... shut up! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:36:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 428833] Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160436.m0G4a7YQ010399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-settings-daemon - the daemon sharing settings from GNOME to GTK+/KDE applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428833 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2008-01-15 23:36 EST ------- I did the work on both sides of the review here, since Bastian was already gone, and I wanted this finished... it is not a big deal anyway, this is just a part of the control-center package that Bastian already maintains, broken out as a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:37:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:37:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160437.m0G4bi3V028637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From jfearn at redhat.com 2008-01-15 23:37 EST ------- I note that although a few people have commented on this name being unacceptable, none of those people felt strongly enough to actually update the wiki with the new rules. Updated rules would have been nice to have before considering new names. Rrepackage everything before considering a new name is onerous and could quickly become a very annoying experience. Having said that, here are links to the new spec file and srpm. http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devil.spec http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devil-0.26-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160453.m0G4rAus013314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com 2008-01-15 23:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #69) > I note that although a few people have commented on this name being > unacceptable, none of those people felt strongly enough to actually update the > wiki with the new rules. Updated rules would have been nice to have before > considering new names. Those packaging guidelines wiki pages have ACLs set on them. I think only Fedora Packaging Committee members can commit there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 16 04:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 23:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 333491] Review Request: preload - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200801160459.m0G4xxMD014251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: preload - Preload is an adaptive readahead daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=333491 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: preload-0.4 |Review Request: preload - |- Preload is an adaptive |Preload is an adaptive |readahead daemon |readahead daemon Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2008-01-15 23:59 EST ------- a few issues: 1. You don't seem to be applying all the patches, just patch0? Any reason for that? 2. You seem to have