[Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 2 16:48:19 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package review: tcl-html


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264





------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org  2008-01-02 11:48 EST -------
* The Provides: line is not needed, since this package doesn't actually provide
  any code.
* download urls for sourceforge are best listed as:
  URL:  http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/tcl/tcl%{version}-html.tar.gz
  ...instead of using a hardcoded mirror.
* The RPM group would be more accurate as 'Documentation'
* A proper 'index.html' index page would be useful.  A simple one can 
  be created in either %prep or %build as a symlink to point to 'contents.htm'
  ln -s html/contents.htm html/index.html
* Minor nitpick:  I've been told by others that it's good to have
  an empty %build and %install section in the spec file instead
  of leaving them out.  Apparently there are some rpm corner cases that
  will choke if they sections are missing.  In these cases, I usually do
  this:

%build
# Nothing to build.

%install
# Nothing to install.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list