[Bug 427264] Package review: tcl-html
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 2 16:48:19 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Package review: tcl-html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427264
------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2008-01-02 11:48 EST -------
* The Provides: line is not needed, since this package doesn't actually provide
any code.
* download urls for sourceforge are best listed as:
URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/tcl/tcl%{version}-html.tar.gz
...instead of using a hardcoded mirror.
* The RPM group would be more accurate as 'Documentation'
* A proper 'index.html' index page would be useful. A simple one can
be created in either %prep or %build as a symlink to point to 'contents.htm'
ln -s html/contents.htm html/index.html
* Minor nitpick: I've been told by others that it's good to have
an empty %build and %install section in the spec file instead
of leaving them out. Apparently there are some rpm corner cases that
will choke if they sections are missing. In these cases, I usually do
this:
%build
# Nothing to build.
%install
# Nothing to install.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list