[Bug 250093] Review Request: dbxml - An embeddable XML database

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jan 5 16:04:06 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dbxml -  An embeddable XML database


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250093


mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-01-05 11:04 EST -------
Almost okay.

For 2.3.10-9:

* EVR specific Requires between subpackages
  - Usually the dependency between subpackages must be EVR
    (Epoch-Version-Release) specific, not just Version.
    i.e. dbxml-utils must have "Requires: %{name} =
         %{version}-%{release}", for example.

* Parallel make
  - Support parallel make if possible, otherwise please comment
    about not supporting parallel make.

* Timestamps
  - Please try to keep timestamps on installed files when possible.
    * Please use "-p" option when using "cp" or "install" commands

* Defattr
  - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)

* Undefined non-weak symbol
  - "$ rpmlint dbxml" returns lots of undefined non-weak symbols
    ! Note
      rpmlint can be used for installed rpm.
     You can also check this by
     $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libdbxml-2.3.so (on i386)

    For this package this cannot be ignored because this package provides
    -devel subpackage and these symbols causes linkage failure.
    Perhaps libdbxml-2.3.so must be linked agaist some more libraries.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list