[Bug 427618] Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jan 5 17:34:32 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nvclock - Utility that allows users to overclock NVIDIA based video cards


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427618





------- Additional Comments From rpm at greysector.net  2008-01-05 12:34 EST -------
rpmlint output clean:
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result
nvclock-gtk.i386: W: no-documentation

Source md5 matches upstream:
eab0a35a79f0165310be759b043deedb  nvclock0.8b3.tar.gz

Builds in mock: devel/i386, F-7/x86_64

Problems:
1. License field says GPLv2+, but
src/libc_wrapper.c has MIT license (GPLv2+ compatible)
src/backend/i2c.c and nv40.c have some additional (apart from the GPL) clauses -
can you verify that they don't impose any restrictions over GPL terms?

2. This part could use a little more spacing for legibility:
[...]
%package gtk
Summary: Nvclock gtk frontend
Group: Applications/System
%description gtk
This package contains the nvclock gui.
[...]

3. make is called without %{?_smp_mflag} and no comment is present explaining why.

4. Since the icon you add is 48x48, why not put it in
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/
?
Of course, then you need to add
%post gtk
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
  %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
fi

%postun gtk
touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ]; then
  %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || :
fi

5. Why aren't you building the QT interface? AFAICT it builds and works just as
well as the GTK interface.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list