[Bug 427509] Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 02:34:26 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-or - Oriya hunspell dictionaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427509
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-06 21:34 EST -------
Looks good to me.
* source files match upstream:
079e450c3920d3a94c83b08fd90eb7b365a4fbb87b4ece1935f414a02a442502
or-demo.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
hunspell-or = 20050726-2.fc9
=
hunspell
* %check is not present; not test suite upstream. I have not tested this
package as I do not speak Oriya.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list