[Bug 427513] Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ne - Nepali hunspell dictionaries


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427513





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-01-07 00:52 EST -------
rpmlint complains:
  hunspell-ne.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL
A version is mandatory these days.  I can't see one indicated anywhere in this
package, though, and I'm not sure it's safe to just assume LGPLv2+.

* source files match upstream:
   b19a287970de63d246b4710f15ff6a039527a394e88b17be1d0ffc90753ece72  
   ne_NP_dict.zip
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
? license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X rpmlint has a valid complaint
* final provides and requires are sane:
   hunspell-ne = 20061217-1.fc9
  =
   hunspell
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* acceptable content
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.