[Bug 427699] Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 7 05:50:26 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fprint_demo - Demo of the fprint drivers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427699


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2008-01-07 00:50 EST -------
Packaging looks ok.
except I think you should install icon file /usr/share/pixmaps


Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream.
32e663a938e19801bdd17105d5c4d310  fprint_demo-0.4.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present in separate -doc subpackage.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are honored correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Desktop files handled correctly.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ GUI app.

APPROVED.

SHOULD:
  Change install location of fprint-icon.png to /usr/share/pixmaps



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list