[Bug 226073] Merge Review: libXfont

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: libXfont


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226073


bugzilla at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora
            Version|devel                       |rawhide

panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2008-01-13 02:43 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
+ rpmlint output is ok to accept
libXfont.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-libs
libXfont.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-libs
libXfont.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-libs
libXfont.src:19: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-libs
libXfont.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes XFree86-devel
libXfont.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes xorg-x11-devel
libXfont-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
libXfont-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel
libXfont-devel.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel
+ source match upstream
b2f396b62633819bbdd9748383876e21  libXfont-1.3.1.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags are used correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains contents.
+ no static libraries.
+ xfont.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ ldconfig scriptlets are used.
+ Package libXfont-1.3.1-2.fc9 =>
  Provides: libXfont.so.1
  Requires: libXfont.so.1 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libfontenc.so.1 libfreetype.so.6
libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libz.so.1
+ Package ibXfont-devel-1.3.1-2.fc9 =>
Requires(pre): xorg-x11-filesystem >= 0.99.2-3
Requires: libXfont = 1.3.1-2.fc9 libXfont.so.1 libfontenc-devel pkgconfig
xorg-x11-proto-devel
+ Not a GUI app.

APPROVED.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.