[Bug 225909] Merge Review: iputils

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: iputils


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225909


mnagy at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW
               Flag|needinfo?(mnagy at redhat.com) |




------- Additional Comments From mnagy at redhat.com  2008-01-14 10:41 EST -------
Updated in CVS. rpmlint now gives me:
iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping6 root 04755
iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping6 04755
iputils.i686: E: setuid-binary /bin/ping root 04755
iputils.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /bin/ping 04755
- these are okay, we need root privileges
iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath /bin/tracepath
iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/ping6 /bin/ping6
iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/arping /sbin/arping
iputils.i686: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/sbin/tracepath6 /bin/tracepath6
- won't fix, because if i would change these to relative it would be dangerous
iputils.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name rdisc
- this is alright (this package is a collection of utilities, which rdisc is
part of)

I also changed the character encoding for RELNOTES to utf8, and few symlinks.
I was also talking to Martin Bacovsky (previous maintainer) and he said that he
did query upstream for license files, but didn't receive no response.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.