[Bug 210776] Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: monotools - access to monodoc without using monodevelop


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210776


david at lovesunix.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|jpmahowald at gmail.com        |david at lovesunix.net




------- Additional Comments From david at lovesunix.net  2008-01-14 13:21 EST -------
GOOD:
Builds in mock (fedora-development-x86_64)
Spec is in readable US English, and sexy sed magic
Cleans up after itself
Owns all the good stuff

BAD:
mono-tools.src: W: strange-permission mono-tools.patch 0600
File permissions should be %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Should excludearch ppc64 on account of #241850 - remember to add a note please
(I suspect I forgot this in the previous mono reviews - please apply liberally
to mono specs)

mergh?:
I'm still not liking that whole defining the libdir thing, it seems like a build
system bug which we are hiding but in this case it's even uglier than before.
Please consider removing the define and just invoking %{_libdir} as an argument
to configure.
You might also want to expand the description a bit so it makes more sense for
users such as which tools this package provides.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.