[Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2008-01-15 09:41 EST -------
Thx for your advice Ralf:

Actually the only difference between ppc and x86_64 (for example and expect for
the pkgconfig path for libdir is:
----------------
diff -uNr usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h
--- usr/include/ETL/etl_profile.h	2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100
+++ usr-x86_64/include/ETL/etl_profile.h	2008-01-15 13:49:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
 
 /* Define to 1 if your processor stores words with the most significant byte
    first (like Motorola and SPARC, unlike Intel and VAX). */
-#define WORDS_BIGENDIAN 1
+/* #undef WORDS_BIGENDIAN */
 
 /* define if the vsnprintf function is mangled */
 /* #undef vsnprintf */
----------
But this define isn't used elsewhere than in etl_profile.h. If we can consider
this as a noach package, then we might need to rip out these lines...

Instead of using ETL-config, i was think about having this: (see attachement)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.