[Bug 428777] Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 16 00:06:36 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-NBName - Net::NBName perl module


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428777





------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu  2008-01-15 19:06 EST -------
This one build OK; rpmlint says:
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-NBName-0.26/README
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/share/doc/perl-Net-NBName-0.26/Changes
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/bin/nodescan.pl
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/bin/nodestat.pl
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
   /usr/bin/namequery.pl
All of these can be fixed with a quick pass through sed; see 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CommonRpmlintIssues

  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/nodescan.pl
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/nodestat.pl
  perl-Net-NBName.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/namequery.pl
These scripts are executable, but the first line of each doesn't contain the
'#!' line that would enable the kernel to know how to run them.  As a result
these scripts do nothing except spew shell errors.  You will need to add
  #!/usr/bin/perl
to each.

Checklist:
* source files match upstream:
   947cf41234f88779086f851748a86b04bf6f851f0d84b8950c8e3fbdbf20cd2e
   Net-NBName-0.26.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
X rpmlint has valid complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Net::NBName) = 0.26
   perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery) = 0.26
   perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery::RR) = 0.26
   perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus) = 0.26
   perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus::RR) = 0.26
   perl(Net::NBName::Request)
   perl-Net-NBName = 0.26-1.fc9
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery)
   perl(Net::NBName::NameQuery::RR)
   perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus)
   perl(Net::NBName::NodeStatus::RR)
   perl(Socket)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=2, Tests=23,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr +  0.01 csys =  0.09 CPU)

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list