[Bug 427481] Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 16 07:47:36 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel - Documentation tool chain


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481


petersen at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |petersen at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com  2008-01-16 02:47 EST -------
Thanks for the update. :)  Taking this review.

Commenting below on
http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/documentation-devel/trunk/Files/documentation-devil.spec
since spec file in srpm appears to be slightly older.

Just a few comments for upstream on the tarball:
- Are all "Common_Content/common/*/images/*.png" the same?  It would save quite
a bit of space sharing the images (just a comment though).
- It would be nice to preserve timestamps when generating the tarball if possible.
- Upstream's docbook-xsl-1.72.0/doc/ is empty.
- The latest upstream docbook-xsl is 1.73.2 any plans to update to it at some
point?  (docbook-style-xsl-1.73.2 is already in fedora)
- There is po2xliff in translate-toolkit: dunno how it compares with po2xlf

(these are not blockers - just things to consider upstream)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list