[Bug 403741] Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: OpenEXR_CTL - A simplified OpenEXR interface to CTL


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403741





------- Additional Comments From kwizart at gmail.com  2008-01-16 10:33 EST -------
Thx for your review!

About regenerating autotools. It is related to the automake version used
(automake-1.9 - we don't have it yet as an alternative). using automake-1.10 it
will produce some strange result. So i will probably work with upstream to
improve either configure.in or Makefile.am to be automake-1.10 compliant. 
Until then, patching libtool seems safer to me.

About BR/R OpenEXR: you are right. Only libs are checked at configure and no
binaries are mentioned nor required for the program to run. I will remove them
before import.

Patches have been submitted upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1872980&group_id=184265&atid=908566

I will request EPEL branch but this will not make sense to have it for now...
(only if we decide to have ilmbase and update OpenEXR to 1.6.x later)





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.