[Bug 427483] Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: documentation-devel-JBoss - JBoss Theme


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427483


kwade at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kwade at redhat.com




------- Additional Comments From kwade at redhat.com  2008-01-17 23:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)

> The main goal here is to allow JBoss writers, developers, and the _extensive_
> JBoss community to use Fedora as their main work environment for documentation.

I'm not sure what you mean by this point?  They can choose to use a non-free
license if they wish, although I'm don't initially see how the NC helps when it
comes to taking community content into formal, Red Hat-produced JBoss (i.e.,
commercial) documentation.

> The JBoss documentation uses the above license. The xml & images in this package
> is embedded in the books at build time.

Potentially, content from a fully-free usage of a CC license might be blendable
with non-free CC licenses.

Regardless, the copyright owner can choose to dual-license.  Is that Red Hat?

> I need a license that allows the xml and images to be used in Creative Commons
> Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike books.

As in bz #427483, the original copyright holder can choose to dual-license.  The
NC clause is a restriction of a freedom, making that particular CC license
non-free, and therefore not allowed in Fedora.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.