[Bug 252457] Review Request: prtconf - SPARC OpenPROM dump utility
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 18 20:48:30 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: prtconf - SPARC OpenPROM dump utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252457
bugzilla at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|devel |rawhide
tibbs at math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From tibbs at math.uh.edu 2008-01-18 15:48 EST -------
Completely forgot to make it back to this.
It's kind of tough to do a review on an arch you don't have, but:
prtconf.sparc: W: non-standard-group Utilities/System
Not a problem.
prtconf-debuginfo.sparc: E: empty-debuginfo-package
Nothing at all there. The compiler isn't being called with the proper set of
flags, and CFLAGS is overridden in the Makefile.
prtconf.sparc: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.3-7 1.3-6.al3
Maybe Release: didn't get updated with the last change to the package?
prtconf.sparc: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultrabook
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/cp1500
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra450
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/e10000#2
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/e3000
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra5
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss1000
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra2
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra1
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultraAX
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss2000
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra30
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss20
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss4
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss5
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss2
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultra250
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/e5000
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ultrabook
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/je1
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ipx
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/s3gx
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/e10000#1
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss10
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/e4000
prtconf.sparc: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/prtconf/examples/ss1000e
I'm not sure what these are about. I'm pretty sure they shouldn't be
executable, and they're probably only useful as documentation. (I'd just drop
the "install examples/*" bit from %install and just stick "%doc examples" in
the %files list. And the untrabook example might as well have a pass through
sed.
Some other bits:
I'm not sure URL is useful; it just points me at the sunsite main page.
The COPYING file needs to be included as %doc.
I can't install or test this package so here's as much review as I can do:
* source files match upstream:
28a9b9d0a680050e33b5ea54aede0f8fcedd51568cd23cd5f3d225fdb608c112
prtconf-1.3.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
X license text included in upstream tarball but is not in the package..
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none)
X compiler flags are not the recommended ones.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in koji (scratch build provided)
X debuginfo package is not complete.
X rpmlint has valid complaints
* final dependencies are sane.
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions odd (executable examples)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list