[Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 23 15:47:41 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221
mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-01-23 10:47 EST -------
! Note
For general packaging guidelines you can refer to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
I just did a quick glance at your spec file and just tried to rebuild
your srpm.
* Rebuild failed.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=362863
It seems that at least texinfo is missing from BuildRequires.
* Fix SourceURL (see "Sourceforge.net" of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL )
* Don't use Epoch unless needed.
* BuildRoot does not match Fedora guidelines.
* Please make it sure that fedora specific compilation flags are
honored correctly ("Compiler flags" of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines )
* Compilation flag "-O3" is not allowed for Fedora because this
makes debugging difficult.
* Also "-fomit-frame-pointer" is forbidden
* And please consider to remove "-ffast-math" as this relaxes
calculation precision and may cause debugging difficult.
* We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-)
* Please write the %files entry more verbosely so that we can grasp
what files are installed easily.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list