[Bug 252257] Review Request: mogilefs-server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jan 24 14:29:55 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mogilefs-server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257
rc040203 at freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi
------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2008-01-24 09:29 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> And I still must disagree. Unless we're going to start renaming projects
> because they're hosted at sourceforge.
That's irrelevant.
This is a CPAN distributed distribution
http://search.cpan.org/dist/mogilefs-server/
=> "cpan update" will pull them in.
=> it is being installed under the perl installation hierarchy.
=> its modules are being searched under the standard perl module directories
=> it can be used by other perl modules.
It's not any different from any other CPAN distributions, it's the same as for
why all perl packages are being named perl-<distro>
It's the same as for why perl's "gettext"
http://search.cpan.org/dist/gettext/
is called perl-gettext (cf. it's review. This particular package had been
renamed for exactly the same rationale)
Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed to add a
"Provides: moglilefs-server = <package-version>"
to the corresponding package.
(In reply to comment #16)
> Hmm, I'm wondering what to do now since my reviewers disagree :-)
> I don't have a strong opinion about this.
I do.
> Maybe the packaging commitee should have a discussion about this?
Tibbs, Spot and I are package committee members. Ville (another FPC member) had
enforced this rule in the past.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list