[Bug 226353] Merge Review: quota

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: quota


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353


limb at jcomserv.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net  2008-01-25 15:24 EST -------
I get the impression that if quota-devel is made a virtual package, the real
package will never happen.  Of course, the real quota-devel would require the
main package anyway, so anyone installing -devel wouldn't notice.

How would we move this header to the glibc package?  Unless I misunderstand,
that sounds unnecessarily awkward.  I'm more in favor of the virtual package route.

I'd be ok with the virtual package, but my preference is still the -devel
subpackage.  I guess I'm having a hard time understanding your objection to
that.  Sure, it's an extra package, but it's the same SRPM, and no real extra
maintenance.  It would reduce bloat for end users, and have negligible effect on
developers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.