[Bug 253741] Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories
Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |panemade at gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2008-01-27 23:59 EST -------
rpmlint reports
perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ArgumentUsingRequests)
perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Requests)
perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdateModifyingResponses)
perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdatingResponses)
perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Responses)

Can we make above versioned?

I don't think adding tests in %doc as blocker. I saw that this is already
proposed in perl packaging draft also.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.