[Bug 226147] Merge Review: mktemp
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jan 29 14:40:42 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: mktemp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226147
------- Additional Comments From ovasik at redhat.com 2008-01-29 09:40 EST -------
Sorry, but coreutils 6.10 mktemp DOES provide -p option. This option is
depricated, but still usable ... Or do I miss something? On upstream pages is "A
different, but compatible, implementation of mktemp is available as part of GNU
coreutils." . Please provide me an example where the BSD mktemp is doing
something what GNU mktemp can't.
BSD mktemp options:
Usage: mktemp [-V] | [-dqtu] [-p prefix] [template]
GNU mktemp options:
Usage: /bin/mktemp [OPTION]... [TEMPLATE]
Create a temporary file or directory, safely, and print its name.
If TEMPLATE is not specified, use tmp.XXXXXXXXXX.
-d, --directory create a directory, not a file
-q, --quiet suppress diagnostics about file/dir-creation failure
-u, --dry-run do not create anything; merely print a name (unsafe)
--tmpdir[=DIR] interpret TEMPLATE relative to DIR. If DIR is
not specified, use $TMPDIR if set, else /tmp.
With this option, TEMPLATE must not be an absolute name.
Unlike with -t, TEMPLATE may contain slashes, but even
here, mktemp still creates only the final component.
-p DIR use DIR as a prefix; implies -t [deprecated]
-t interpret TEMPLATE as a single file name component,
relative to a directory: $TMPDIR, if set; else the
directory specified via -p; else /tmp [deprecated]
--help display this help and exit
--version output version information and exit
So the only option I see as unavailable in GNU version is -V (and even that
option is in fact usable)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list