[Bug 453119] Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libvirt-java: Java bindings for the libvirt library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453119





------- Additional Comments From veillard at redhat.com  2008-07-01 10:21 EST -------
Okay, finding the right include paths for JNI stuff is fairly messy,
and well gcj-devel has a bug plugging them by default in gcc include
path (fun see #453572).
I think I have ironed out the problems, regenerated a new 0.1.1 release

SRPMS: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/java/libvirt-java-0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm
spec: ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/java/libvirt-java.spec

wei:~/libvirt-java -> rpmlint
/u/veillard/rpms/SRPMS/libvirt-java-0.1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
libvirt-java.src: E: unknown-key GPG#de95bc1f
libvirt-java.src: W: strange-permission libvirt-java.spec 0600
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
wei:~/libvirt-java -> 

  I think if one ignore the fact that rpmlint doesn't know my PGP key
this looks decent.

  For the spec file I used the following:

%define java	java
and
Requires:	%{java} >= 1.5.0
BuildRequires:	%{java}-devel >= 1.5.0

because some users may want to define more precisely which java environment
they want for development. Ideally this should remain that flexible (the src
RPM rebuit even on a RHEL4 with Java SDK in /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-ibm-1.5.0.7)

I hope it's okay now,

Daniel

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.