[Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324


mlichvar at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From mlichvar at redhat.com  2008-07-03 13:35 EST -------
The spec file is cleanly written, everything seems good.

- rpmlint is silent
- the package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
- the spec file name matches the base package %{name}
- the package meets the Packaging Guidelines
- the package is licensed with a Fedora approved license
- the License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+)
- the package includes the text of the license in %doc
- the spec file is written in American English
- the spec file for the package is legible
- the sources used to build the package matches the upstream source
- the package successfully builds in x86_64 and ppc rawhide
- all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
- the spec file handles locales properly
- the package owns all directories that it creates
- the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing
- permissions on files are set properly
- the package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- the package consistently uses macros
- the package contains code, or permissible content
- files included as %doc don't affect the runtime of the application
- desktop file is installed with desktop-file-install
- the package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages
- at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- all filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8
- the package functions as described (tested only on x86_64)

Approved.

The sed line in %prep can be removed, the typo was fixed in 0.1.3.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.