[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 6 07:52:50 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108





------- Additional Comments From oded at geek.co.il  2008-07-06 03:52 EST -------
Thanks for the feedback.

Regarding the %{?fedora} conditional - it is required if I want to support
Fedora versions older then 8 (do I?), and Fedora 9 at least seems to still
support it. I would be very surprised if it would be dropped from future Fedora
versions.

I'll contact upstream and see if I can get them to add a license file.

Regarding the rpmlint output: 
  * I didn't understand the %doc output from rpmlint - I'm using %doc because I
want to package the README and examples, I don't see how it relates to headers
or static libraries. BTW - my rpmlint doesn't report that.
  * The uncompressed zip file is an issue with upstream - I decided not to
repack upstream for obvious reasons. The new 0.11.1 version seems to fix this.

I've repacked and published a new version of the SPEC and package for a new
upstream version, and for Fedora 9 (which I'm currently running):
SRPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-1.fc9.src.rpm
SPEC: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib.spec
RPM: http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc9/python-html5lib-0.11.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm

The new SPEC file work seamlessly for Fedora 8 and an update package will be
available at http://rpms.geek.co.il/fc8 shortly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list