[Bug 452663] Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 13 16:22:24 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: andika-fonts - Andika SIL fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452663





------- Additional Comments From mnowak at redhat.com  2008-07-13 12:22 EST -------
MUST Items:

PASS - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. 
PASS - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
PASS - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format 
PASS - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
PASS - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
PASS - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
PASS - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) ...
PASS - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
PASS - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is
unable to read 
PASS - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. 
- did sha1sum; sources matches
 NA - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
 NA - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, 
 NA - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
 NA - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. 
 NA - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files
 NA - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state 
PASS - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
PASS - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
PASS - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with 
PASS - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot}
PASS - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the 
PASS - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
 NA - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. 
PASS - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. 
 NA - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
 NA - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
 NA - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files 
 NA - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix 
 NA - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require 
 NA - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
removed in the spec.
 NA - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file
PASS - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 
PASS - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
PASS - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
- UTF8 + ASCII (sub-set of UTF*)

SHOULD Items:

 NA - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) 
 NA - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain 
 NA - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. 
- no deps - no mock
PASS - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
PASS - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. 
- took a look via gnome-font-viewer
PASS - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. 
 NA - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
 NA - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) 
 NA - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, 

Overall:

PASS

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list