[Bug 249949] Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 13 21:17:05 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: beldi - Belug Linux Distribution Burner


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249949





------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de  2008-07-13 17:17 EST -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> FAIL - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not match the
> actual license: Code is GPLv3+, but License tag is GPLv2+
> FAIL - MUST: License text from source is included in %doc, but the License is
> out of date (GPLv2)

Changed to GPLv3+ in the spec file, sent e-mail to upstream to correct that for 
the next upstream release.

> FAIL - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but
> gtkglextmm-devel is only needed when building with --enable-opengl. The OpenGL
> interface looks really cool and works here and so I suggest to include it. 
> What do you think?

I agree with you, enabled now. Thought, that would be catched up automagically
once the dependency is satified, but it looks not as it would be the case.

> FIX - SHOULD: Please bug upstream to include an updated copy of the license 
> text.

Done, see above and within your mailbox.

> FIX? - SHOULD: Could you include a German translation of description and
> summary?

No not really, this is something for specspo package.

> FIX - SHOULD: Typo in description: less -> least, consist -> consists.
> IMHO the description could be simplified a little:

I've taken your rewrite now, sounds better. Former description was taken from
the Beldi website.

> NEEDSWORK

Done, SRPM: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/beldi-0.9.16-3.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list