[Bug 453944] Review Request: ruby-taglib - Ruby library wrapping the Taglib library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ruby-taglib - Ruby library wrapping the Taglib library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453944


goyal.hemant at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |goyal.hemant at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From goyal.hemant at gmail.com  2008-07-18 04:18 EST -------
[X]   - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review. 
-SILENT

[X]   MUST: spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
      format %{name}.spec

[X]   MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.

[X] - MUST: Fedora approved license - MIT License

[X] - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
      license.

    - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
      license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
      the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.

[X] - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.

[X] - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 

[X] - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
      as provided in the spec URL. 

================================================================================
md5sum ruby-taglib-1.1.tar.bz2 
462d2717c912251b6d9693e0ac40c08f  ruby-taglib-1.1.tar.bz2
md5sum ruby-taglib-1.1_upstream.tar.bz2 
462d2717c912251b6d9693e0ac40c08f  ruby-taglib-1.1_upstream.tar.bz2
================================================================================

[X] - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms
	    on at least one supported architecture.

[X] - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.

[X] - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly - No localized files.

[X] - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files 
	    (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
	    must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
	    - It just a library package

[X] - MUST: Not a relocatable Package.

[X] - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
	    If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should
            require a package which does create that directory.
            Refer to the Guidelines for examples.'
           - BuildRequires:	ruby specified for ruby_libdir directory

[X] - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.

[X] - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.

[X] - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains
      rm -rf %{buildroot}
      - %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT specified in Clean Section

[Please Check]- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.

===============================================================================
Perhaps you might want to use %{name}-%{version} in the names of the patches as
well? Just a suggestion..
===============================================================================

[X]-  MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.

[X]-  MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.

[X] - MUST: To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
      properly if it is not present.

[X] - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.

[X] - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.

[X] - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
      (for directory ownership and usability).

[X] - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
      then library files that end in .so (without suffix)
      must go in a -devel package.

[X] - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
      package using a fully versioned dependency:
      Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

[X] - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be
  removed in the spec.

[X] - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a
  %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with
  desktop-file-install in the %install section. 

[X] - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed
  should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. T

[X] - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} 
 

[X] - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

SHOULD Items:

[X] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - Tested
            on Koji.

[X] - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all     
                    supported architectures - noarch package

==============================================================================
The package looks fine to me after checking against the Review Guidelines.

APPROVED BY ME.
==============================================================================

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.