[Bug 456583] Review Request: calamaris - Squid native log format (NLF) analyzer and report generator
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 25 18:57:02 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: calamaris - Squid native log format (NLF) analyzer and report generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456583
redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de 2008-07-25 14:57 EST -------
Regarding "cvsextras: no": I think, our talk in IRC explains it, it's just the
old thing regarding changes which are done to help/improve but cause damages on
the package, because the changing person hasn't enough knowledge about the pkg
or didn't check all points for a version change which maybe introduces new bugs
or even regressions caused by upstream. And as of the moment, I'm able to walk
through all of my (30?) packages, I've usually open less than 5 open bug reports
assigned to me which are handled in most cases < 24 hrs - even if I'm abroad.
On the other hand, there are co-maintainers as well, but I still think, that I
am maintaining also many packages just for myself such as php-idn, beecrypt,
perl-Net-LibIDN, digitemp, libopm, perl-ccom, tcpick, bind-libbind and others.
Note, that even some of my packages have "cvsextras: yes" and I'll re-think it
and maybe change it for one or another non-critical, but more active package via
the pkgdb.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list