[Bug 457060] Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060





------- Additional Comments From sahartsu at xs4all.nl  2008-07-29 13:09 EST -------
RPM Lint: no %build warning
Package name: ok
Spec file: ok
License: GPLv2
Actual License: GPLv2 (source tarball carries license.txt)
%doc License: ok
Spec file language: ok
Spec file readable: ok
Upstream source vs. used tarball: matches, noted that upstream doesn't version
their releases very well ;-)
Compile and Build:
 - F-7: builds
 - F-8: builds
 - rawhide: builds
 - EL-5: builds

Applicable Package Guidelines: 
 
Locales: not applicable
Shared libs: not applicable

Relocatable: no
Directory and file ownership: ok
No duplicate files in %files: ok
File Permissions: ok
Macro usage: ok
Code vs. Content: ok
(Large) Documentation: ok
%doc affecting runtime: ok
Header files in -devel package: not applicable
Static Libraries in -static package: not applicable
pkgconfig Requires: not applicable
Library files: not applicable
Devel requires base package: not applicable
.la libtool archives: not applicable
Duplicate ownership of files/directories: no
Remove BuildRoot: yes
UTF-8 filenames: no 

If the %build section (which can be empty) is added back to the spec, I can
approve the package

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.